Afghanistan Review, 05 June 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Investment-Opportuni
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN AFGHANISTAN'S AGRICULTURE SECTOR 2012 - 2013 Private Sector Development Directorate November 2012 Apples on a farm in Kabul province This brochure was published on the occasion of the Kabul International Agfair, which was held on November 7-9, 2012. Its purpose is to provide a brief overview of investment opportunities to AgFair participants, as well as to all other interested investors. For additional information, please contact the Private Sector Development Directorate at: [email protected] Table of Contents Introductory Words - H.E. Minister Rahimi 3 Welcome to Investors - Abdul Qayoom Bassam, Private Sector Development Directorate Directo 5 Arazi - Afghanistan Land Authority 7 AISA - Afghanistan Investment Support Agency 9 Irrigation Sector 11 Rice Mill Processing and Marketing East/Northern Regions 14 Fresh Fruit Processing - Eastern Region 15 Farm Machinery Manufacturing 16 Saffron Processing and Marketing in Herat 17 Automated Packaging Plant in Kabul 18 Livestock By-Products 19 Cashmere Production 20 Fruit Juice Processing in Kabul 21 Tomato Paste Processing and Marketing in the Northern Region 23 Cold Storage Facility in Kabul 24 Edible Oil Processing and Packaging in Balkh Province 25 AgFairs as a Networking Opportunity 26 2 Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock Introductory Words of H.E. Minister Mohammad Asif Rahimi Respected Readers and Visitors to the Kabul International AgFair, it is a pleasure to present you with this brochure which provides up-to-date information on investment opportunities in Afghanistan's agricultural sector. Being one of the fastest growing sectors of the Afghan economy, there is no doubt that agriculture provides almost inexhaustible opportunities for investment. -
Special Report No
SPECIAL REPORT NO. 444 | MARCH 2019 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org How Peace Was Made: An Inside Account of Talks between the Afghan Government and Hezb-e Islami By Qaseem Ludin Contents Background ...................................3 Talks Begin ................................... 5 Internal Consensus and Divisions .................................7 Components of the Peace Deal ....................................8 Sealing the Deal ......................... 12 Implementation of the Agreement ............................ 13 Lessons for Negotiations with the Taliban ........................... 14 Gulbuddin Hekmatyar addresses supporters in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, in March 2018. (Photo by Ghulamullah Habibi/EPA-EFE/ Shutterstock) Summary • For more than four decades, Afghan- • Peacemaking is a difficult process, the challenges and divisions that istan has been in a state of war and but often the most difficult part is had to be overcome in order to violent conflict that has destroyed how to start peace talks. Thus, the make the September 2016 peace much of the country’s physical and experience of negotiating peace agreement possible. social infrastructure and prevent- between the Afghan government • After the peace accord with ed the formation of a state stable and the Hezb-e Islami insurgent Hezb-e Islami, Afghans have an- enough to establish law and order. group offers unique insights on other historic chance to bring an • Although several internal and exter- peacemaking in the modern era. end to years of conflict with the nal factors contributed to the conflict • This report, based on the author’s Taliban. The Afghan government’s and its current political and security experience working as a negoti- negotiations with Hezb-e Islami environment, a key factor has been ator during talks between the Af- provide important lessons that can weak Afghan leadership, exacerbat- ghan government and Hezb-e Isla- be applied to future peace negoti- ed by political frictions among elites. -
National Institution Building Project (NIBP)
United Nations Development Programme Afghanistan Afghanistan National Institution Building Project (NIBP) Third Quarter Project Progress Report – July to September, 2011 HE Mohammad Asif Rahimi, Minister of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (MAIL) is speaking to the stakeholders during the presentation workshop of Capacity Development Plan of MAIL organized by NIBP Project ID: 00073380 Project Period: January 2010 to December 2013 Strategic Plan Component: National ownership, Capacity Development, South-South Cooperation, Democratic Governance CPAP Component: Strengthening Democratic Governance ANDS Component: Governance, Rule of Law and Human Rights Total Budget: USD 115, 019, 355 Responsible Agency: UNDP and IARCSC National Institution Building Project, Project ID: 00073380 2 | P a g e NIBP DONORS Quarterly Progress Report, July – September 2011 National Institution Building Project, Project ID: 00073380 3 | P a g e Table of Contents List of Acronyms ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 I. Context ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 8 II. Results and Impact ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……… 10 III. Implementation Arrangements ……………………………………………………………………………………. 25 IV. Challenges/Risks/Issue ……………………………………………………………………………..………….…....…. 25 V. Lessons Learnt ……………………………………………………………………..…………………………..…………… 26 VI. Future Plans ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………. 27 VII. Financial Information ………………………………………………………………………………….………..………. 29 Annexes -
EVALUATION Final Performance Evaluation Accelerating Sustainable Agriculture Program (ASAP)
USAID Afghanistan EVALUATION Final Performance Evaluation Accelerating Sustainable Agriculture Program (ASAP) April 2012 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared under contract with Checchi and Company Consulting, Inc. for USAID’s Afghanistan “Services under Program and Project Offices for Results Tracking” (SUPPORT) project. Final Performance Evaluation Accelerating Sustainable Agriculture Program (ASAP) April , 2012 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared under contract with Checchi and Company Consulting, Inc. for USAID’s Afghanistan “Services under Program and Project Offices for Results Tracking” (SUPPORT) project. i ii ASAP ACTIVITY LOCATIONS Regional Command North (RC-North) Kunduz Jawzjan Balkh Badakhshan Takhar Regional Command West (RC-West) Samangan Baghlan Regional Command Faryab Sari Pul East (RC-East) Bamyan Cashmere Ghor Herat Wardak Nangarhar VFU Dai Kundi Ghazni AgDepot Urea Treatment Paktika Farah Alfalfa Zabul Trellising Kandahar Pomegranate Helmand Nimruz Regional Command Agribusiness South (RC-South) Gender iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ASAP ACTIVITY LOCATIONS ............................................................................................ iii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................ vi I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... -
Afghanisches Kabinett Komplett Parlamentsabstimmung Bestätigt Alle 25 Minister
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Hauptabteilung INT Team Asien e.V. Politischer Bericht / Kurzbericht Thema: Afghanisches Kabinett komplett Parlamentsabstimmung bestätigt alle 25 Minister Autor: Dr. Babak Khalatbari Ort/Datum: Kabul, 25.09.2006 Länder- / Regionalprogramm: AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISCHES KABINETT KOMPLETT Afghanisches Kabinett komplett Parlamentsabstimmung bestätigt alle 25 Minister INHALT 1. Abstimmungsverlauf 2. Lebensläufe der Minister 3. Kabinettsübersicht 4. Abstimmungsergebnisse 1 AFGHANISCHES KABINETT KOMPLETT Abstimmungsverlauf Das Kabinett von Präsident Karzai, das Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2006 und am Montag, aus insgesamt 25 den 7. August 2006 stellten sich die von Präsident Ministerien besteht, ist Karzai vorgeschlagenen Minister für die neue nun komplett. Regierung dem Parlament zur Vertrauens- abstimmung. Vorangegangen waren Anhörungen, in denen die Ziele, aber auch professionelle Erfahrung derzeit im Gespräch. Am 23.04.2006 wurde und die Nationalität der Kandidaten thematisiert unserem Büro von einem Parlamentarier mitgeteilt, worden waren. Die Presse in Afghanistan dass im Parlament zwischenzeitlich eine nicht kommentierte den Ausgang der Vertrauens- öffentliche Verfahrensabstimmung (87 Ja- abstimmung im April als Überraschung, da von den Stimmen/53 Nein-Stimmen) die Bestätigung der 25 von Präsident Karzai vorgeschlagenen drei in Frage gestellten Kandidaten ergeben habe. Kandidaten 20 angenommen und fünf abgelehnt Der Kandidat für das Amt des Kulturministers, Dr. wurden. Es mussten demnach fünf Kandidaten Sayed Makhdum -
Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs May 12, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The capacity, transparency, and legitimacy of Afghan governance are considered crucial to Afghan stability as U.S.-led NATO forces turn over the security mission to Afghan leadership. The size and capability of the Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but the government remains weak and rife with corruption. The government has slowly widened its writ, even though substantial powers are concentrated in the elected presidency through powers of appointment at all levels. President Hamid Karzai has served as president since late 2001; he is constitutionally term-limited and will leave office after the conclusion of presidential and provincial elections the first round of which took place on April 5, 2014. Several major figures registered to run for president, and many of their slates included faction leaders long accused of human rights abuses. Karzai appeared to tilt toward his longtime confidant and former Foreign Minister, Zalmay Rasoul, but the final, uncertified vote count showed Northern Alliance “opposition” leader Dr. Abdullah Abdullah with nearly 45% of the vote and former Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani with about 31.5%. Abdullah’s total, if certified, is close to but still short of the 50%+ needed for victory. A runoff round is tentatively scheduled for June 7. There are discussions among the major candidates, President Karzai, and other senior figures on a settlement that might avoid the runoff. -
Weekly Analysis / 285
Weekly Analysis / 285 www.csrskabul.com Center for Strategic & Regional Studies Kabul Weekly Analysis-Issue Number 285 (Jan 19-26, 2019) Weekly Analysis is one of CSRS’ publications, which significantly analyses weekly economic and political events in Afghanistan and the region. The prime motive behind this is to provide strategic insights and policy solutions to decision-making institutions and individuals in order to help them to design best policies. Weekly Analysis is published in local languages (Pashto and Dari) and international languages (English and Arabic). ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ In this issue: Candidates and the fate of Afghan presidential elections Elections Late Experiences ......................................................................... 3 Current Election Teams .............................................................................. 4 Strong Candidates teams ........................................................................... 5 1-Mohammad Ashraf Ghani and his team ................................... 5 2-Dr. Abdullah Abdullah and His Team ......................................... 6 3-Mohammad Hanif Atmar and his team...................................... 7 4-Gulbadin Hekmatyar and his team ............................................ 8 The Electoral System and the Election Commission ................................... 8 The Future of Elections ............................................................................. -
The Dissipation of Political Capital Among Afghanistan's Hazaras
Working Paper no. 51 THE DISSIPATION OF POLITICAL CAPITAL AMONG AFGHANISTAN’S HAZARAS : 2001-2009 Niamatullah Ibrahimi Crisis States Research Centre June 2009 Crisis States Working Papers Series No.2 ISSN 1749-1797 (print) ISSN 1749-1800 (online) Copyright © N. Ibrahimi, 2009 24 Crisis States Research Centre The Dissipation of Political Capital among Afghanistan’s Hazaras: 2001-2009 Niamatullah Ibrahimi Crisis States Research Centre Introduction Since its establishment in 1989 Hizb-e Wahdat-e Islami Afghanistan (The Islamic Unity Party of Afghanistan) has been an important political and military player in Afghanistan. Like most contemporary major political parties in Afghanistan, Hizb-e Wahdat is rooted in the turbulent period of the anti-Soviet resistance movements in Afghanistan in the 1980s. It was formed to bring together nine separate and mostly inimical military and ideological groups into a single entity. During the period of the civil war in the early 1990s, it emerged as one of the major actors in Kabul and some other parts of the country. Political Islamism was the ideology of most of its key leaders but it gradually tilted towards its Hazara ethnic support base and became the key vehicle of the community’s political demands and aspirations. Its ideological background and ethnic support base has continuously shaped its character and political agenda. Through the jihad and the civil war, Wahdat accumulated significant political capital among Afghanistan’s Hazaras, which arguably could have been spent in the establishment of long-lasting political institutions in Afghanistan. By 2009, however, Wahdat was so fragmented and divided that the political weight it carried in the country bore little resemblance to what it had once been. -
Integrity-Forum-2018-Highlights.Pdf
PLANET INTEGRITY: BUILDING A FAIRER SOCIETY 27-28 March 2018 - Paris, France HIGHLIGHTS With over 1800 participants from 120 countries representing relevant policy communities, sectors and professions, the OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum is leading the policy debate on integrity and anti-corruption worldwide. A truly multi-stakeholder event, the OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum uniquely brings together government, business and civil society leaders and experts on an equal footing, on the broadest possible range of issues related to integrity and anti- corruption, such as trade, foreign bribery, infrastructure, local governance, sports, education, behavioural insights, revenue collection, competition, and development co-operation. GLOBAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIVE 18 Research poster 120 countries 1/3 government presentations 1 800 participants 1/3 business Launch of latest findings 122 leaders & 24 thematic sessions expert speakers Angel Gurría - OECD Secretary-General Planet Integrity is not a distant dream, it‘s an urgent necessity. Our citizens are losing faith, a Under the theme “Planet Integrity: Building a Fairer Society”, the Forum promoted integrated situation which worsened with the crisis. anti-corruption strategies and practices to ensure @OECD‘Angel Gurría #OECDintegrity inclusive growth, strengthen sustainable development, and address the backlash to globalisation. Leaders and participants advocated for integrity and anti-corruption as a precondition to levelling the Trust is fundamental for the -
Petersberg Papers on Afghanistan and the Region
Liechtenstein Colloquium Report Petersberg Papers on Afghanistan and the Region Wolfgang Danspeckgruber Editor Volume IV 2009 Petersberg Papers on Afghanistan and the Region Wolfgang Danspeckgruber Editor Liechtenstein Colloquium Report Volume IV © 2009 The Trustees of Princeton University Produced and published by the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination This report was made possible in part by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The statements made and the views expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the contributing authors. Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 08544 USA Telephone: 609.258.6200 Facsimile: 609.258.5196 Electronic Mail: [email protected] Website: www.princeton.edu/lisd CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword Wolfgang Danspeckgruber .................................................................................................................. 6 Special Statements Opening Address Rangin Dadfar Spanta .................................................................................................................. 7 An Exit Strategy for Afghanistan Volker Stanzel .............................................................................................................................. 10 Special Statement Rita Kieber-Beck ........................................................................................................................ -
The a to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009
The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009 AFGHANISTAN RESEARCH AND EVALUATION UNIT Improving Afghan Lives Through Research The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009 Seventh Edition AFGHANISTAN RESEARCH AND EVALUATION UNIT Improving Afghan Lives Through Research IMPORTANT NOTE: The information presented in this Guide relies on the voluntary contributions of ministries and agencies of the Afghan government, embassies, development agencies and other organisations representing donor countries, national and international NGOs, and other institutions. While AREU undertakes with each edition of this Guide to provide the most accurate and current information possible, details evolve and change continuously. Users of this guide are encouraged to submit updates, additions, corrections and suggestions to [email protected]. © Copyright Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, January 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing areu@ areu.org.af or by calling +93 799 608 548. Coordinating Editor: Cynthia Lee Contacts Section: Sheela Rabani and Noorullah Elham Contributors: Ahmadullah Amarkhil, Amanullah Atel, Chris Bassett, Mia Bonarski, Colin Deschamps, Noorullah Elham, Susan Fakhri, Paula Kantor, Anna Larson, Sheela Rabani, Rebecca Roberts, Syed Mohammad Shah, -
CBCMPCBCMP -- Capcapacityacity Buildingbuilding Andand Changechange Managementmanagement Prprogramogram 20102010 -- 20122012
CBCMPCBCMP -- CapCapacityacity BuildingBuilding andand ChangeChange ManagementManagement PrProgramogram 20102010 -- 20122012 November 2012 This publication was produced for review by the United States Department of Agriculture. It was prepared by the International Executive Service Corps under the Cooperative Agreement 58-3148-1-042. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Agriculture of the United States Government. CAPACITY BUILDING AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CBCMP) 2010-2012 CBCMP’S ASSISTANCE - OVERALL CONTEXT A sustainable, thriving agricultural economy through improved delivery of agricultural related public services CBCMP's assistance objective is firmly planted in the 2009 USG Agriculture Assistance Strategy for Afghanistan, whose primary goal is to increase confidence of Afghans in their government. The explicit means identified is to increase the capacity of CBCMP's principal partner, Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (MAIL), to deliver services to rural farmers and herders and promote the private sector and farmer associations. This is to be done through a US Government “Unity of Effort through a Whole-of-Government” provision of technical assistance and direct ministerial budget assistance through USDA and USAID. CBCMP is the linchpin in this effort with MAIL to increase and improve its delivery of agricultural-related public services. The USG agriculture assistance strategy calls for CBCMP to implement Change Management and improve capability of the DAILs (MAIL subunits at the provincial level) to plan budgets and implement projects or programs. In addition to that, the USDA AAEP and USAID AGRED projects are tasked with properly training, equiping, and deploying extension workers. How CBCMP complements other important donors’ approaches? As part of the post 2014 transition strategy for Afghanistan, the World Bank has called for donors to help the GIRoA finance the development budget, including public investment and operations and maintenance (O&M).