East Midtown Rezoning Area January 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Midtown Rezoning Area January 2013 Pre-War Commerical/Office Buildings NYC Landmark Recommendations J East Midtown Rezoning Area 1 2 January 2013 L K 16.39 1 2 3 4 9 American Encaustic 18-20 E 41st St. 22-24 E 41st St. 299 Madison Ave. Residential Tile Company George & Edward Blum, George & Edward Blum, Hill & Stout, 1912-13 8 Showroom 1912 1912-14 Built FAR:13.18 (21.6) 16 E 41st St. Built FAR: 18.78 (21.6) Built FAR: 2.93 (21.6) 1 Rich & Mathesius, 1922 18.0 Built FAR: 3.73 (21.6) 3 1 2 3 Minnie Young Residence Martin Erdmann 39 E 51st St. 19 E 54th St. Residence York & Sawyer, 1902-3 Hiss & Weekes, 1899 (now Friar’s Club) Built FAR: 3.64 (14.4) 14.4 5 6 7 8 Built FAR: 6.18 (18.0) 57 E 55th St. 18.0 Taylor & Levi, 1908-09 Pershing Square Building Graybar Building Postum Building 400 Madison Ave. Built FAR: 4.38 (14.4) 100 E 42nd St. 420 Lexington Ave. 250 Park Ave. H. Craig Severance, 2 14.4 York & Sawyer, 1914-23 Sloan & Cross & Cross, 1923 1929 Hotels Built FAR: 20.92 (21.6) Robertson,1927 Built FAR: 17.81 Built FAR: 16.27 (21.6) Built FAR: 18.2 (24.0) (21.6) 8 7 14.4 1 13.44 5 Post-War Commercial/Office Buildings 6 2 5 10.39 14.4 7 21.6 3 1 2 3 4 6 17.81 Hotel Beverly Montclair Hotel Shelton Hotel Lexington Hotel 125 E 50th St. 541 Lexington Ave. 525 Lexington Ave. 509 Lexington Ave. 1 2 3 4 Emery Roth & Sylvan Emery Roth, 1927-28 Arthur Loomis Harmon, Schultze & Weaver, 4 Bien, 1926-27 Built FAR:12.84 (18.0) 1922-23 1928-29 3 The American Distillers 355 Lexington Lord Memorial Bldg, 711 Third Avenue Built FAR: 18.48 (18.0) Built FAR:18.12 (18.0) Built FAR:17.95 (21.6) Building Emery Roth & Sons, Children’s Aid Society William Lescaze & 99 Park Ave. 1955 150 E 45th St. Gibbons Associates,1956 Emery Roth & Sons, 1952 Built FAR: 16.02 (21.6) Heidtmann & Salvador, Built FAR: 14.07 (18.0) Built FAR: 20.68 (21.6) 1950; 4 floors added 24.0 1967 Built FAR: 4.32 (21.6) 6 18.0 2 3 1 3 4 4 5 6 Barclay Hotel Roosevelt Hotel 5 111 E 48th St. 45 E 45th St. 4 5 6 7 8 Cross & Cross, 1926 George B. Post, 1925 (Former) Girl Scouts of Union Carbide, Banker’s Trust 400 Park Ave. Built FAR: 10.39 (21.6) Built FAR: 13.81(24.0) America HQ, 830 3rd 270 Park Ave. Skidmore 280 Park Ave. Emery Roth & Sons, 14.4 Ave. Skidmore, Owings Owings & Merrill, Emery Roth & Sons, 1955 & Merrill: Roy O. Allen & Gordon Bunshaft 1960-63 Built FAR: 17.08 (21.6) Institutional William T. Meyer, 1957 & Natalie de Blois, Built FAR: 15.34 (21.6) 1 Built FAR: 13.44 (18.0) designed 1955; built 1957-60 2 Built FAR: 16.82 (21.6) Residential Hotel Institutional Pre-War Commercial/Office 1 2 3 4 Post-War Commerical/Office The Brook The Bible House Yale Club Chemists’ Club Existing Landmark 9 J K L 111-113 E 54th St. 5 E 48th St. 50 Vanderbilt Ave. 50-52 E 41st St. Chase Manhattan Universal Pictures 532 Madison Ave. INTERIOR: Hoffman Delano & Aldrich, 1925 Wilfred E. Anthony, James Gamble Rogers, York & Sawyer, 1910 Bank, 410 Park Ave. Building Horace Ginsbern & Auto Display Room, Built FAR: 4.09 1921 1915 Built FAR: 11.2 (21.6) Emery Roth & Sons 445 Park Ave. Associates, 1957-58 430 Park Ave., Frank (14.4 or 21.6) Built FAR: 3.99 (14.4) Built FAR: 19.21 (24.0) with Skidmore Owings Kahn & Jacobs, 1946- Built FAR: 8.17 (18.0) Lloyd Wright, 1954 & Merrill, 1956-59 47 Built FAR: 16.39 (21.6) Data: DCP Map PLUTO v. 10.2; Landmark Data Accurate as of 2010. Map & Layout by Kerri Culhane; Photos by Nadezdha Williams, Francoise Bollack & Barbara Zay. Bollack & Barbara Francoise Williams, Nadezdha Photos by Kerri Map & Layout by Culhane; as of 2010. Accurate Landmark Data 10.2; v. DCP Map PLUTO Data: Built FAR: 20.2 (21.6) Built FAR: 17.5 (21.6) 0 .25 mi.
Recommended publications
  • Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -200 8-4978 -HCM HEARING DATE: January 15, 2009 Location: 701 South Hill St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 9 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Central City 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Downtown Los Angeles 90012 Legal Description: FR4 of Mueller Subdivision of the North ½ of Block 26 Ord’s Survey PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/ Kyung Ku Cho c/o Young Ju Kwon APPLICANT: 3200 Wilshire Blvd. #1100 Los Angeles, CA 90010 OWNER’S Robert Chattel REPRESENTATIVE: Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation 13417 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 94123 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10(c)4 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal may warrant further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: November, 2008 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 701 S. Hill Street. CHC-2008-4978-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1929 and located in the downtown area, this 13-story commercial building exhibits character-defining features of Art Deco-Gothic architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • A – SMOKE and MIRRORS (The United Nations Building to Grand
    SMOKE AND MIRRORS (The United Nations to Grand Central Station) ____________________________________________ At the edge of the world sits a Tower. And this Tower is no structure of brick and mortar, but a kind of illusion; a trick of the light, flickering electric blue in and out of sight; a coalescing of vapors; of misplaced goodwill. The kings and queens of the world attend here, pronouncing PEACE, while raining armaments on those of their own, or those of their own they believe to be not. But still the pilgrims come in the thousands from the Terminal seeking an audience, uninformed or disregarding of this Congregation’s inadequacy. Through miles of devastated landscape they come with their fragile appeals in their hands, towards the Tower shimmering like a mirage in the distance; and the mediaeval brick city-fortress that guards its flanks. Around them, light and shadow play upon pillars of glass and steel, reflected one upon the other so reality is indiscernible from reflection; so the pilgrim, his eyes confused and diverted, does not realise that there is in fact, nothing behind the smoke and mirrors; that this entire landscape of grandiose ideals is insubstantial. Ting 8 1 – The United Nations Secretariat Tower, completed in 1952 and designed by an international committee of architects, including Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer, amongst others. Ting 9 2 – Isaiah 2:4, on the Scharansky steps, named after a Soviet dissident, and part of the Ralphe Bunche Park. This park is across from the UN complex. 3 – Channelling Hampton Court: Tudor City, a luxury residential project built between 1925-28, by the Fred F.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Year Book, University of Illinois
    B RARY OF the: UNIVERSITY or ILLINOIS v.\4 -\5 ^HITECTURE GS YEAR =- i VMIVER OF - ILL r7 r^> \^ P.-^^-.p-vi I7V\ ytrrfv T/ f1 T? r? w i V :"!^^ ^mmM^^^I PORTAL OF SAINT TROPHIME Plym Envoi 2] RfCKTR LIEItARY ARCHITECTURE Urli^'tuSlTY OF ILLli\01S V, I 4 '/b University of Illinois DAVID KlNLEY, Ph.D.. LL.D., President College of Engineering MiLO S. KETCHUM. B.S., C.E. Dean Harvey Herbert Jordan, B.S. Assistant Dean Department of Architecture 1926-1927 LORING HARVEY Provine. B.S.. A.E.. A. I. A Processor of Architectural Engineering and Head of the Department James McLaren White. B.S.. A.!. A. ...... Professor of Architectural Engineering. Supervising Architect REXFORD NEWCOMB. A.m., M.Arch., A. I. A. Professor of History of Architecture Lemuel Cross Dillenback, A.M., A. LA. Associate Professor of Architectural Design Cyrus Edmund Palmer. B.S., M.S. Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering La Force Bailey, B.S., M.S.. B.P.. A. LA. Assistant Professor of Architectural Design Thomas Edward O'Dgnnell, B.S., M.S.,. M.Arch., A. LA. Assistant Professor of Architecture William Arthur Foster, B.S..B.Arch.. Assistant Professor of Rural Architecture Newlin Dolby Morgan. B.S.. C.E. Assistant Professor of Architectural Engineering DANIEL Donald McGervey, B.A. Associate in Architectural Design Frank Mills Lescher. B.S. Instructor m Architecture James Howard Chance, B.S. Instructor in Architecture Rodney Eugene Spangler, B.S., Instructor in Architecture Gerald Vivian Davis, Ecole des Beaux Arts Instructor in Freehand Drawing Phillmore Jacobson, B.S. Instructor m Architecture John William Kennedy, A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • M Grand Central Post Office Annex Southwest Corner 45Th Street and -. Lexington Avenue New York City New York HABS No. NY-6302 I
    Grand Central Post Office Annex HABS No. NY-6302 m Southwest corner 45th Street and -. Lexington Avenue New York City New York C ip ; PHOTOGRAPHS • WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY MID-ATLANTIC REGION, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106 *" HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY GRAND CENTRAL POST OFFICE ANNEX HABS No. NY-6302 Location: The block bounded by 45th Street, Lexington Avenue, Depew Place, and the Graybar Building (the southwest corner of 45th Street and Lexington Avenue), New York City, New York. USGS Central Park Quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: 18 .586450 .441166 Present Owner: United States Government Present Occupant: United States Post Office Significance The Grand Central Post Office Annex was envisioned as a key element of the Grand Central Station complex, one of the most important examples of monumental urban planning in the United States. Designed by the nationally significant architectural firm of Warren and Wetmore, in collaboration with the firm of Reed and Stem, the complex was built between 1903 and 1914 for a railroad cartel headed by the mighty New York Central Railroad. It included the massive Terminal itself, surrounded by raised traffic viaduct, the Post Office Annex, railroad offices on 45th Street, and a vast underground network of tracks and platforms. The breadth of the project and the richness of its execution documents not only the tremen- dous wealth of the railroads during the period, but also their influence in shaping the image of American cities. The Annex was constructed as part of the complex to provide railroad-related office space on the upper floors while the lower stories were leased as a postal facility.
    [Show full text]
  • FRED F. FRENCH BUILDING, 551 Fifth Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 18, 1986; Designation List 184 LP-1415 FRED F. FRENCH BUILDING, 551 Fifth Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1926-27; architects: H. Douglas Ives and Sloan & Robertson. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1281, Lot 1 On January 11, 1983, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Fred F. French Building ann the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 10). The hearing was continued to February 8, 1983 (Item No. 5) Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. A total of seven witnesses spoke in favor of designation. The Commission has received several letters ann other expressions of support in favor of this designation. One letter was written in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located on the northeast corner of 45th Street and Fifth Avenue, the Fred F. French Building was constructed in 1926-27 as corporate headquarters for the prominent real estate firm of the same name. A proto­ Art Deco design, with strong Near Eastern influences, it represents the stylistic compromise between lingering historicism and the modernistic trends that typified the architecture of the late 1920s. The Near Eastern allusion is enhanced by a dramatic series of setbacks. Although mandated by the Building Code of 1916, these wedding cake-like tiers found a romantic corollary in Assyrian ziggurats. The setbacks taper off to a lofty terraced tower which enriches the midtown skyline with iconographic bas-reliefs, Mesopota~ian in both their imagery and execution in richly colored faience.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 8 – Neighborhood Character
    East Midtown Rezoning and Related Actions FEIS Appendix 8 – Neighborhood Character East Midtown Rezoning and Related Actions FEIS HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT AROUND GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL Development of the area around Grand Central Terminal was a key component of the original Grand Central project and the character of the neighborhood surrounding Grand Central, while changing significantly over time, has continued to be strongly defined by its relation to the Terminal building. In 1902, the New York Central Railroad proposed a novel plan to raise revenues for construction of the new train depot—by selling and leasing the air rights over the tracks between Madison and Lexington Avenue from East 42nd to East 50th Streets (and including the west blockfronts of Park Avenue between East 50th and East 52nd Streets) to allow for construction of revenue-producing office, hotel and apartment buildings. The area was developed in two general phases. First, the area directly around the Terminal was developed in the 1910s, while the area further north along Park Avenue was developed in the 1920s. The 1910 generation of buildings—all built before the introduction of the 1916 New York City Zoning Resolution— were generally characterized by high street walls unattainable under the new regulations. The 1920 phase buildings were built pursuant to the 1916 zoning regulations and were configured with lower street walls, building setbacks and towers, best exemplified by the Waldorf-Astoria. Development of the area was rapid, such that three of the buildings built during the first phase were replaced by new, larger developments in the second—including the Graybar Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural
    MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Environmental Assessment Supplemental Section 106 Review for the Expansion of New Rochelle Yard on the Metro North New Haven Line New Rochelle, Westchester County, NY MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Westchester, Queens & Bronx Counties, New York August 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Lynn Drobbin & Associates and WSP MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Contents 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. CONSULTING PARTIES AND RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ...................................................................4 2.1 CONSULTING PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT .................................................................................................................6 3.1 DEFINITION OF THE PSA PROJECT AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT................................................................................... 6 3.2 DEFINITION OF THE APE FOR EXPANSION OF THE NEW ROCHELLE YARD ON
    [Show full text]
  • We Have Grand Central Covered
    WE HAVE GRAND CENTRAL COVERED 230 237 340 450 PARK PARK MADISON LEXINGTON THE HELMSLEY BUILDING AKA 460 LEXINGTON COMMITMENT TO RXR REALTY + THE MARKET CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RXR has made a tremendous commitment ARE PLEASED TO PRESENT to the GCT sub-market and believes in the longevity of arguably the most centrally RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES located sub-markets of Manhattan. WITHIN THE RXR With 21.6 million tourists visiting Grand GRAND CENTRAL Central every year and 45 million annual subway riders from one of 5 lines going TERMINAL PORTFOLIO through Grand Central, the retail stands to benefit from a tremendous amount of traffic throughout the year at all times of the day. CURATING THE THE GCT PORTFOLIO CONSISTS OF: PERFECT MIX RXR is committed to partnering with the right 230 PARK 237 PARK retailers and curating the perfect tenant mix THE HELMSLEY BUILDING AKA 460 LEXINGTON to service the RXR office population while 3,000 Daily Workers 4,500 Daily Workers benefiting from the tremendous footfall from commuters and tourists. RXR retail tenants will benefit from cross 340 MADISON 450 LEXINGTON marketing efforts through the different 1,500 Daily Workers 2,600 Daily Workers buildings in the GCT portfolio as well as activation opportunities throughout the year. 4,340,809 SF OF 67,315 SF OF TOTAL OFFICE SPACE TOTAL RETAIL SPACE 48TH ST FIFTH AVE MADISON AVE AVE PARK AVE LEXINGTON THIRD AVE CITIBANK STARBUCKS JPMORGAN JPMORGAN BLUESTONE LANE CHASE & CO CHASE & CO 47TH ST VANDERBILT AVE VANDERBILT FINANCIER PATISSERIE DUANE READE JPMORGAN AT&T PEOPLE’S PRET A MANGER CHASE & CO 230 PARK RECEIVES 237 PARK RECEIVES UNITED BANK GREGORY’S CHARLES 3,500 DAILY 4,500 DAILY COFFEE TYRWHITT SOUL HSBC BANK WORKERS & VISITORS WORKERS & VISITORS DR SMOOD CYCLE 46TH ST JOS.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Journey
    LUNCH & LEARN ADVOCACY ADVOCACY GREEN & EMERGING GREEN & PINNACLE Updating Fire Technical response opposing Serve on DOB WELLNESS LEADERS WELLNESS AWARDS Alarm Systems the proposed mercury testing Management Local Laws 95 One Vanderbilt WELL Deep Dive and abatement bill Committee & 97 Building Tour regarding ongoing IN THE NEWS LUNCH & LEARN Building Code BOMA FACTS BOMA Magazine ADVOCACY 55 Water Street THE 2020 15 PropTech ADVOCACY updates Q&A with Carolina Winter Business Building Tour Trends That Will Initial and ongoing meeting Ramos, Rockhill JANUARY Meeting & National FEBRUARY Management Impact CRE with OEM and the DOH about Issues Conference JOURNEY the emerging Coronavirus FROM ADVERSITY TO GREATNESS LIGHT OF HOPE CORONAVIRUS COLAB WEBINAR CORONAVIRUS MEMBER ALERT GUEST SPEAKER ADVOCACY ADVOCACY NYC buildings UPDATE PART I UPDATE COVID-19 Polly Trottenberg, Initiated on going Initiated on going illuminate DOB – Resolve DOB Coronavirus and Governor Cuomo - Preparedness Commissioner calls with OEM and calls with OEM and exteriors using Violations, Stop Work the Building All non-essential Checklist NYC DOT Public/Private Public/Private We roared into 2020 after a red, white and Orders, Vacate Orders, Workplace: Are businesses and Partners, as well as Partners, as well as blue Submit Full Demolition You Prepared? workplaces in NY CORONAVIRUS GREEN & with OEC with OEC record-breaking year of member and Site Safety Plans - will be required to UPDATE WELLNESS MEMBER ALERT MEMBER ALERT All without visiting have 75% of their MARCH programming, healthy occupancy levels, DOB - Minimize LEED Green How to Prepare How to Prepare DOB oces employees WFH strong employment numbers, and Walk-In Trac Associate Exam Your Tenants and Your Tenants and unprecedented economic growth.
    [Show full text]