DOCSLIB.ORG

Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Review Report 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Review Report 2009 Report of the Review of the Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research JUNE 2009 CENTRE FOR PLANT BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH REVIEW REPORT 2009 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Findings: 2 Recommendations: 4 Role and function of the Centre: Future directions Partnership and governance arrangements Operational Matters Outreach/Extension INTRODUCTION 7 Terms of Reference 7 BACKGROUND TO THE CENTRE 8 History of the Centre 8 Previous reviews 8 Responses to the reviews 9 Summary of current operations 9 REVIEW APPROACH 10 Briefing materials 10 Staff survey 11 Call for submissions 11 Review Meetings and consultation 12 ISSUES ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 13 ROLE AND FUNCTION OF THE CENTRE 13 PARTNERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS 28 OPERATIONAL MATTERS 33 OUTREACH 35 i Executive Summary The Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research was formed in November 1993 as a joint venture between CSIRO and Environment Australia (now the Department of the Environment, Water Heritage and the Arts) thereby providing a national focus for advancing knowledge fundamental to sustainable management of Australia’s plant biodiversity. The Centre incorporates the native plant research activities and the combined herbaria of CSIRO Plant Industry and the Australian National Botanic Gardens. The formation of the Centre created major opportunities for bringing together the databases and networks of the ANBG and CSIRO and for providing a seamless view of the Centre’s and the Commonwealth’s botanical information. The arrangement has been formalised through the signing of an Agreement between the two parties. Detailed information about the Centre and its activities can be found at the following web address http://www.anbg.gov.au/cpbr/. The Objectives of the Centre are: (a) to be a National Centre of research excellence in the fields of plant systematics and conservation biology, as a basis for conservation and sustainable management and use of Australian vegetation. (b) to develop and manage scientific collections of Australian and related floras as the Australian National Herbarium, a permanent record of Australian plant diversity, and as a source for research on these floras, and to provide the scientific authenticity of the ANBG. (c) to provide a national focus for and play a role in national botanical database management, and to represent and promote Australia internationally within the botanical database management field. (d) to pursue research, education and training relevant to Centre programs and objectives. (e) to ensure that the two parties add value to each other and the Centre, through their differing backgrounds and disciplines, and, through the Centre, serve the Parent Bodies and stakeholders, including the Living Collections of the Parties; and (f) to maximise the benefits flowing from applications of Centre Intellectual property. The Centre was reviewed in 1998 followed by the renewal of the Agreement until 31 December 2009. Both parties agreed that a formal review occur before the expiry of the current agreement. The finding and recommendations below arise from a review of the Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research carried out in May 2009 by an external review panel. The Review has clearly confirmed the valuable role performed by the taxonomic and related research undertaken by the Centre, supporting nationally critical decision making on biodiversity conservation. 1 Detailed findings and recommendations point to specific instances of the value of the Centre and identify areas for improvement in its operation over time. Findings: A. The fundamental rationale for the Centre as a strategic collaboration between the CSIRO and the Department centred on the consolidation of research collections and associated activities remains valid. B. The joint venture partnership on which the Centre is based itself adds value to the activities and character of the Centre delivering significant benefits back to the partner organisations with the total benefits representing value significantly greater than the sum of the inputs. C. Outcomes of the taxonomic and related research by the Centre are often critical inputs to decision making on complex biodiversity conservation issues. D. The role and scope of activities at the Centre have narrowed in recent years from the original Mission, with a marked reduction in conservation genetics and population ecology work. E. There is a lack of clarity in the identity and current scope of the Centre’s activities. The absence of an Annual Report and confusion relating to the physical location of the Centre and its relationship with the Australian National Botanic Gardens contributes to this. F. The Draft Strategic Plan 2005 - 2009 documents activities in a very general way, rather than providing strategic guidance and identifying flagship projects. G. The Centre has a strong international reputation for excellent scientific research, particularly in the fields of systematics and botanical information management. H. However, there is a need to increase the number of specialist research staff to build the research science capability required to address biodiversity science issues of national importance, particularly: • systematics and its applications; • population genetics and ecology; • biodiversity information analysis; • restoration ecology; and • innovative taxonomy protocols and practice. I. The Centre is an exemplar for how collections can be managed and made available to the community through Australia’s Virtual Herbarium and other electronic media and the integral connection between research and collections. J. The Australian National Herbarium Collection has high national and international value and there is a need to maintain the high standard of curation currently in place. Concerns about the availability of long term storage and appropriate infrastructure for the Collection need to be addressed. K. As well as state-of-the-art curation, it remains important that core high quality science capacity resides with the research collection to facilitate its use and contemporary curation, so that its economic and other value is fully appreciated 2 and enhanced. L. While there has been an extended period of concentration on water and climate change issues, there is now renewed recognition of the importance of biodiversity within partner organisations, as evidenced by the recent establishment of a biodiversity theme in the CSIRO and in the internal review of biodiversity programs in the Department. M. The Centre is a leader in projects such as the Taxonomy & Research Information Network and Australia’s Virtual Herbarium. The Centre has an excellent relationship with State and Territory Herbaria. These relationships and the Centre’s collaborative international leadership role are pivotal to its future. N. Volunteers and Honorary Associates play an important role in the activities of the Centre and add significant value to the nature and effectiveness of the organisation. O. The involvement of graduate students and the student internship program provide a valuable introduction to plant biodiversity research for interested students and represent a valuable source of specialist expertise to support future scientific effort both in the field generally and also potentially enhancing Centre staff capability. P. Successful collaborations using the resources of the Centre include the wide use of the photographic collection as an educational resource and source of images to illustrate publications as well as the recent ‘Art and the Bryophyte’ venture which culminated in a very successful exhibition at the Australian National Botanic Gardens. Q. After reviewing the provisions of the current Agreement and 2008 Board papers as well as meeting with the Board Chair, Board members and Director of the Australian National Botanic Gardens the panel felt that the effectiveness of the Centre could be enhanced by strengthened governance arrangements particularly: more external input to Board deliberations; more frequent and strategically focused meetings and clearer links with the ANBG. R. While considerable effort has gone into addressing the issues raised and recommendations from the previous review of the Centre, some matters raised remain outstanding. S. Greater recognition should be provided within the Centre for scientists who contribute to policy development. T. The Centre should continue to develop and encourage application of its research, through mechanisms such as Taxon profiles and related outreach. 3 Recommendations: R1. The Director of National Parks and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation should negotiate renewal of the joint venture for a period of ten years, with financial support maintained at a minimum of 1999 levels, in real terms. R2. An Annual Report for the Centre should be prepared and consideration given to joint publication with the Australian National Botanic Gardens. R3. The Board and management of the Centre should review the scope and clarify the strategic direction of the Centre activities. R4. That any unresolved issues arising from the staff survey should be considered and if possible resolved by the management team at the Centre. R5. The Centre should increase the critical mass of specialist scientific research staff by at least the equivalent of two new ongoing salaried positions to secure capabilities for the medium to long term. R6. The Centre should explore longer-term opportunities to integrate the Herbarium with other relevant research collections. R7. The Centre should be clearly identified
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Release of the Leaf-Feeding Moth, Hypena Opulenta (Christoph)
    United States Department of Field release of the leaf-feeding Agriculture moth, Hypena opulenta Marketing and Regulatory (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Programs Noctuidae), for classical Animal and Plant Health Inspection biological control of swallow- Service worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Field release of the leaf-feeding moth, Hypena opulenta (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), for classical biological control of swallow-worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Lamington National Park Management Plan 2011
    South East Queensland Bioregion Prepared by: Planning Services Unit Department of Environment and Resource Management © State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2011 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Resource Management. Enquiries should be addressed to Department of Environment and Resource Management, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Qld 4001. Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. This management plan has been prepared in accordance with the Nature Conservation Act 1992. This management plan does not intend to affect, diminish or extinguish native title or associated rights. Note that implementing some management strategies might need to be phased in according to resource availability. For information on protected area management plans, visit <www.derm.qld.gov.au>. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3224 8412. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (including large print and audiotape) on request for people with a vision impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Potential Use of Phytophagous Mites As Biological Control Agent of Weeds
    Chapter 5 Current and Potential Use of Phytophagous Mites as Biological Control Agent of Weeds Carlos Vásquez, Yelitza Colmenárez, José Morales-Sánchez, Neicy Valera, María F. Sandoval and Diego Balza Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59953 1. Introduction Biological control of weeds by using phytophagous mites may help to contain infestations and reduce their spread in time. Although, eradication is not the goal due to the vastness of the areas, the most desirable scenario is achieved when weeds are no longer a concern and no other control is necessary. However, biological control should not be considered the unique strategy to face weed problems, thus commonly; other methods are still required to attain the desired level of control. There is an increasingly interest in using mites for biological control of weeds, primarily those belonging to Eriophyidae because of they are host-specific and often weaken the host plant affecting plant growth and reproduction. Although eriophyid mite species impact the fitness of their host plant, it is not clear how much they have contributed to reduction of the population of the target weed. In some cases, natural enemies, resistant plant genotypes, and adverse abiotic conditions have reduced the ability of eriophyid mites to control target weed popula‐ tions. Besides, susceptibility of eriophyids to predators and pathogens may also prevent them from achieving population densities necessary to reduce host plant populations. In addition to eriophyid mites, tetranychid mites are also being considered as an alternative for weed control. The gorse spider mite, Tetranychus lintearius Dufour, has shown to reduce shoot growth on gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) by around 36% in impact studies conducted over 2.5 years in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Declaration of Lantana Species in New South Wales Review of the Declaration of Lantana Species in New South Wales
    NSW DPI Review of the declaration of Lantana species in New South Wales Review of the declaration of Lantana species in New South Wales New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Orange NSW 2800 Frontispiece. A flowering and fruiting branch of the common pink variety of Lantana camara, near Copmanhurst (NSW north coast, October 2005) (Source: S. Johnson, NSW DPI). © State of New South Wales through NSW Department of Primary Industries 2007. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. ISBN 978 0 7347 1889 1 Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (December 2007). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of New South Wales Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser. Job number 7262 This document was prepared by Dr Stephen Johnson Weed Ecologist Weeds Unit Biosecurity, Compliance and Mine Safety Telephone: 02 6391 3146 Facsimile: 02 6391 3206 Locked Bag 21 ORANGE NSW 2800 Figure 1. White and purple flowering varieties of the ornamental Lantana montevidensis planted in a median strip, Griffith (south western NSW, September 2005) (Source: S. Johnson, NSW DPI). iv REVIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF LANTANA SPECIES IN NSW CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SCOPE OF THIS REVIEW 3 REVIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF LANTANA SPECIES IN NSW 5 NOMENCLATURE 5 Lantana camara 5 Lantana montevidensis 5 SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS 5 Lantana camara 5 Lantana montevidensis 7 TAXONOMY 9 Family Verbenaceae 9 Lantana genus 9 The Lantana camara species aggregate 9 Varieties of L.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Results
    FLORA AND FAUNA TECHNICAL REPORT Gold Coast Quarry EIS ATTACHMENT A – EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Results April 2013 Cardno Chenoweth 71 EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information about the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details can be found at http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/assessmentsapprovals/index.html Report created: 01/06/12 14:33:07 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 6.0Km Summary Matters of National Environment Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance - see http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/assessmentsapprovals/guidelines/index.html World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International 1 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Areas: None Threatened Ecological Communities: 1 Threatened Species: 57 Migratory Species: 27 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter-Central Rivers, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Director of National Parks Annual Report 2007-08
    Director of National Parks Annual Report 2007–08 Australian National Botanic Gardens www.anbg.gov.au Special features 0 Kilometres 3 The Australian National Botanic Gardens ACT (ANBG) is a major scientific, educational NSW and recreational resource. It was one of the first botanic gardens in the world AUSTRALIAN to adopt the study and display of a NATIONAL Canberra nation’s native species as a principal goal. BOTANIC CBD GARDENS Approximately one-third of the known flowering plant species that occur in Australia and about half the known Lake Burley Griffin eucalypt species are represented in its living collection. The ANBG is a national showcase for the horticultural use of Australia’s native plants. The ANBG contributes to meeting Australia’s obligations under international environment conventions to which Australia is a signatory. In particular, the Convention on Biological Diversity recognises the importance of botanic gardens in ex situ and in situ conservation, research, training, plant identification and monitoring, raising public awareness, providing access to genetic resources, and global cooperation in the sustainable use of plant biodiversity. Location Latitude 35°16’ South, Longitude 149°06’ East 6 Area 85 hectares Proclamation date 17 September 1991 IUCN category Category IV Biogeographic context Displays plants from a diverse range of climatic and biogeographic regions—alpine to tropical, coastal to central desert Management plan Second plan of management expires 9 January 2009 Other significant Management Plan Implementation Schedule;
    [Show full text]
  • Lantana Camara (Verbenaceae) in South Africa
    Past and present initiatives on the biological control of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) in South Africa J-R. Baars & S. Neser ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Lantana camara, a highly invasive weed in many countries, has been targeted for biological control in South Africa since the early 1960s. An earlier review in 1991 indicated that, despite the establishment of several natural enemy species, the programme has largely been unsuccessful. In this paper we review initiatives undertaken during the 1990s and discuss (i) the status of the natural enemies established on the weed, (ii) factors that have limited the impact of these agents, (iii) the potential of eleven new biocontrol candidates currently under evaluation for re- lease and (iv) the problem of expanded host ranges of imported natural enemies under labora- tory conditions. Ultimately, the success of the programme will depend on the establishment of a suite of natural enemies, attacking several parts of the weed, which are able to cope with the ex- treme variability and wide distribution of L. camara in South Africa. Despite the problems associ- ated with the programme, L. camara remains a candidate for biological control in South Africa. Key words: Lantana camara, varieties, biological weed control, natural enemies, host-specificity testing, Lippia. Lantana camara sensu lato (Verbenaceae; Fig. 1), a compounds, notably the pentacyclic triterpenes floriferous, prickly, thicket-forming shrub, which (Kellerman et al. 1996), lantadene A and B (Morton is commonly known as lantana, originates from 1994), which if consumed can cause photosensiti- tropical and subtropical South and Central Amer- zation, liver and kidney damage, paralysis of the ica (Stirton 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations to Irene & Ian Chalmers Who Were Awarded AM
    JULY 2020 MID-MONTHLY BULLETIN Issue 823.5 Patron The Mayor of Willoughby Published by The North Shore Orchid Society Inc. ABN 23 037 753 968 Cr. Gail Giles-Gidney Correspondence & membership enquiries to: The Hon. Secretary, P.O. Box 212, Forestville, NSW 2087, Australia. [email protected] President Website https://northshoreorchidsociety.org/ Gloria Cushway (02) 9971 0296 This is our second mid-monthly bulletin which we will be sending out until [email protected] our monthly meetings are allowed to resume. Photos are from the members so, if you have anything in flower please send your photos to Hon. Secretary me at [email protected] Thanks Lesley Clover Bradley (02) 9489 3861 [email protected] Dear Members we are pleased to inform you that our th Winter Show at Gordon on 8 of July is still on, as Covid Show Marshal 19 cases in New South Wales remain low with very few Garrie Bromley community transmitted cases being reported. For our (02) 9452 3202 helpers at the show we will have masks, hand sanitizer, [email protected] gloves and disinfection wipes. This show is the first of four society shows which are on this month. Hope to see you and your plants there. NSOS Committee Congratulations to Irene & Ian Chalmers who were awarded AM/AOC/OSNSW for Den. Sally Koh Siew Aye ‘Port Hacking’ If you have a plant which you think is worthy of an award please contact Garrie Bromley as awards are still being granted. These are a selection of orchids that members would have benched this month, thank you to the members for sending them to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Issues for the Vascular Flora of Lord Howe Island
    490 Cunninghamia 8(4): 2004 Auld & Hutton, Plant conservation on Lord Howe Island Conservation issues for the vascular flora of Lord Howe Island Tony D. Auld1 and Ian Hutton2 1Biodiversity and Conservation Science Section, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) PO Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220, AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] 2PO Box 157 Lord Howe Island, NSW 2898 AUSTRALIA Abstract: The flora of the Lord Howe Island Group (31°30’S, 159°05’E) comprises a unique mix of elements of Australian, New Zealand and New Caledonian floras. It is significant for its high degree of endemism and for its structural and biological (leaves, flowers, fruit) role in supporting a diverse array of fauna. Conservation of this flora is dependant upon: reducing current habitat degradation (mostly the result of exotic weeds); minimising any future impacts, in particular the effects of climate change on the unique cloud forests of the southern mountains and the continued introduction and spread of weeds and the pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. We provide a description of the nature of the major threats to the flora and suggest an area-based scheme, focussed on the relative conservation significance of remaining vegetation, as a mechanism for developing priorities for threat mitigation activities. While a number of threat control works are in place, eg. weed control, some re-emphasis is needed. In addition, some new initiatives are required including: reducing the rate of introductions of new exotics; a system to remove potential environmental weeds from the settlement area; phytosanitary guidelines; pathogen quarantine measures; search and removal of environmental weeds from remote areas; and ex situ initiatives for plant species restricted to the cloud forests of the southern mountains.
    [Show full text]