DOCSLIB.ORG

STATE HIGHWAY PATROL PROMOTIONS PROMOTIONS/TRANSFERS : EFFECTIVE Monday, 22 February 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STATE HIGHWAY PATROL PROMOTIONS PROMOTIONS/TRANSFERS : EFFECTIVE Monday, 22 February 2021 STATE HIGHWAY PATROL PROMOTIONS CODE RANK / NAME PRESENT STATION NEW RANK NEW DUTY STATION DUTY STATION CITY NO. PROMOTIONS/TRANSFERS : EFFECTIVE Monday, 22 February 2021 Captains Lieutenant T. T. Daniels B-X, Troop B Headquarters Captain A-X, Troop A Headquarters Greenville Lieutenant B. K. Sharpe X-4, Professional Standards Captain G-X, Troop G Headquarters Asheville Lieutenant R. W. Elkins X-3, Field Operations Captain X-3, Field Operations Raleigh Lieutenant J. A. Memory, IV X-3, Field Operation (MCE) Captain X-3, Field Operations (MCE) Raleigh Lieutenant K. G. Brown H-X, Troop H Headquarters Captain X-4, Professional Standards Raleigh Lieutenant S. M. Comer X-7, Logistics Unit Captain X-7, Logistics Unit Raleigh Lieuteant D. K. Owens X-X, Technical Services Unit Captain X-X, Technical Services Unit Raleigh Lieutenants First Sergeant J. L. Miller X-4, Professional Standards Lieutenant B-X, Troop B Headquarters Fayetteville First Sergeant J. E. Dowdle G-1, Yancey County Lieutenant H-X, Troop H Headquarters Monroe First Sergeant C. R. Jones F-4, Iredell County Lieutenant H-X, Troop H Headquarters Monroe First Sergeant D. L. Clifton A-8, Carteret County Lieutenant H-X, Troop H Headquarters Monroe First Sergeant T. W. Peterson X-3, Field Operations (MCE) Lieutenant X-3, Field Operations (MCE) Raleigh First Sergeant P. Marshall X-4, Professional Standards (IA) Lieutenant X-4, Professional Standards (IA) Raleigh First Sergeant D. L. Cavanaugh X-4, Professional Standards Lieutenant X-4, Professional Standards Raleigh First Sergeant M. L. Emmert X-7, Logistics Unit Lieutenant X-7, Logistics Unit Raleigh First Sergeant B. D. Smith B-2, Sampson County Lieutenant X-X, Technical Services Unit Raleigh First Sergeants Sergeant L. M Hill A-4, Washington County First Sergeant A-2, Hertford County Ahoskie Sergeant J. M. Thomas D-9, Guilford County (MCSAP) First Sergeant A-6, Craven County New Bern Sergeant D. T. Sloop E-1, Davidson County First Sergeant A-8, Carteret County Morehead City Sergeant E. T. Brown X-3, MCE (MCSAP) First Sergeant A-9, Pitt County Greenville Sergeant J. E. Stahl, II B-8, Harnett County First Sergeant B-2, Sampson County Clinton Sergeant M. P. Cape C-3, Wake County First Sergeant C-3, Wake County Raleigh Sergeant B. D. Sudduth D-6, Randolph County First Sergeant D-6, Randolph County Asheboro Sergeant B. L. Baucom H-3, Union County First Sergeant E-2, Stanley County Albermarle Sergeant G. R. Reynolds G-4, Buncombe County First Sergeant F-1, Burke County Morganton Sergeant C. D. Hall E-5, Surry County First Sergeant F-4, Iredell County Statesville Sergeant J. L. Crabb G-4, Buncombe County First Sergeant G-1, Yancey County Burnsville Sergeant M. A. Coyle I-2, Mecklenburg County First Sergeant I-2, Forsyth County Winston-Salem Sergeant C. M. Garner C-1, Nash County First Sergeant I-3, Wake County Raleigh Sergeant B. E. Pulliam, III C-5, Greene County First Sergeant X-X, Technical Services Unit Raleigh Sergeants Trooper D. W. Weaver A-1, Dare County Sergeant A-1, Currituck County Currituck Trooper J. G. Williams A-2, Gates County Sergeant A-4, Washington County Plymouth STATE HIGHWAY PATROL PROMOTIONS Trooper D. M. Rich B-4, Duplin County Sergeant B-3, Onslow County Jacksonville Trooper H. P. Locklear B-7, Robeson County Sergeant B-7, Robeson County Lumberton Trooper J. P. Page E-3, Rowan County Sergeant B-8, Harnett County Lillington Trooper J. J. Scott C-1, Edgecombe County Sergeant C-1, Nash County Rocky Mount Trooper F. J. Beam F-3, Caldwell County Sergeant C-3, Wake County Raleigh Trooper B. A. Taylor A-5, Pitt County Sergeant C-5, Greene County Snow Hill Trooper E. J. Williams H-9, Mecklenburg County Sergeant C-6, Johnston County Smithfield Trooper G. N. Gentieu F-1, Burke County Sergeant D-6, Randolph County Asheboro Trooper H. E. Hall D-9, Guilford County (S&W) Sergeant D-9, Guilford County (MCSAP) Greensboro Trooper J. R. Anderson E-7, Davie County Sergeant E-1, Davidson County Lexington Trooper A. C. Ammons G-6, Swain County Sergeant G-3, Polk County Tryon Trooper B. A. Crawford G-5, Jackson County Sergeant G-3, Henderson County Hendersonville Trooper A. K. Johnson F-1, Burke County Sergeant G-4, Buncombe County Asheville Trooper M. A. Goldsmith X-6, Training Academy Sergeant G-4, Buncombe County Asheville Trooper R. R. Hall H-4, Cleveland County Sergeant H-2, Scotland County Laurinburg Trooper C. A. Smith H-6, Moore County Sergeant H-6, Hoke County Raeford Trooper S. L. Williamson I-1, Forsyth County (CIU) Sergeant I-1, Buncombe County (CIU) Asheville Trooper J. F. Bauguess I-3, Forsyth County (Recon) Sergeant I-3, Pitt County (Recon) Greenville Trooper D. S. Gould B-6, New Hanover County Sergeant X-6, Training Academy (TS) Raleigh Civilian Promotions Michael R. Wheeler Network Analyst I Hector E. Betancourt Food Services Supervisor I John R. Hoyle Telecommunications Shift Supervisor Adam C. Lentz Network Analyst I David W. Hewett Telecommunications Shift Supervisor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida
    Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida 18,801,000 8.473 1593 2 Georgia 9,688,000 8.237 798 3 Delaware 898,000 7.272 653 4 Alaska 710,000 5.451 387 5 Vermont 626,000 5.224 327 6 West Virginia 1,853,000 3.756 696 7 Wyoming 564,000 3.475 196 8 Pennsylvania 12,702,000 3.458 4392 9 Massachusetts 6,548,000 3.129 2049 10 New Jersey 8,792,000 3.11 2734 11 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 12 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 13 Montana 989,000 2.568 254 14 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 15 New Hampshire 1,316,000 2.492 328 16 Maryland 5,774,000 2.473 1428 17 Maine 1,328,000 2.402 319 18 New York 19,378,000 2.333 4521 19 Virginia 8,001,000 2.307 1846 20 North Dakota 673,000 2.199 148 21 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 22 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 23 California 37,254,000 2.086 7773 24 Rhode Island 1,053,000 2.061 217 25 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 26 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 27 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 28 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 29 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 30 Indiana 6,484,000 1.883 1221 31 Michigan 9,884,000 1.817 1796 32 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 33 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 34 North Carolina 9,535,000 1.769 1687 35 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 36 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 37 Idaho 1,568,000 1.665 261 38 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 39 Washington 6,725,000 1.573 1058 40 Arizona 6,392,000 1.492 954 41 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 42 Colorado 5,029,000 1.469 739 43 Alabama 4,780,000 1.391 665 44 Texas 25,146,000 1.375 3457 45 Ohio 11,537,000 1.252 1445 46 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 47 Tennessee 6,346,000
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • Jsp 800 Defence Movements and Transportation Regulations
    JSP 800 DEFENCE MOVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS VOLUME 2 PASSENGER TRAVEL INSTRUCTIONS Third Edition By Command of the Defence Council MINISTRY OF DEFENCE January 2010 FOREWORD This document outlines the Joint Service Policy for movement of passengers and provides guidance to formations and units. This volume of JSP 800 is a ‘live’ publication and will be subject to amendment in order to keep it relevant. The travel instructions in this manual replace those formally published in the following areas: a. The previous edition of JSP 800 which should now be destroyed. b. Instructions previously covered in Defence Council Instructions (DCIs) and those DINs which expire on issue of this edition. Personal contact details of junior staff redacted under section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act The Sponsor of JSP 800 Volume 2 is the Deputy Head, SCM. Each Chapter of this volume has a Chapter Sponsor, identified in the contents list, and who is responsible for the maintenance of and update of the content via the process undertaken by the Defence Passenger Policy Committee and associated Working Groups . Chapter Sponsors should review their chapters, to ensure accuracy and relevance, and pass proposed amendments to the Technical Author who will aim to publish amendments to the intranet as a minimum on an annual basis. This volume will contain some reference to DCIs and DINs. It must be noted that these were the latest edition at the time of printing and may have been superseded. Some duplication necessarily exists between these instructions and those contained in other volumes of JSP 800 although this has been minimised.
    [Show full text]
  • 'School of the Trooper' Fills New U.S. Army Europe Stryker Soldier with Information, Pride
    RELEASE #2007-12-04-02 Dec. 4, 2007 ‘SCHOOL OF THE TROOPER’ FILLS NEW U.S. ARMY EUROPE STRYKER SOLDIER WITH INFORMATION, PRIDE By Sgt. Mark B. Matthews 27th Public Affairs Detachment CAMP LIBERTY, Iraq -- A new Soldier arrives with bags in hand and waits patiently for a representative from his unit come integrate him into a new unit and a new home away from home here. Hours go by and he begins to wonder if anyone even knows he's here. The doubtful first impression of a unit left in the mind of such a Soldier is one U.S. Army Europe's 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment -- an organization with a history of welcoming Soldiers with open arms -- works hard to avoid. The 2nd SCR “Dragoons” take pride in a long- standing tradition known as the “School of the Trooper” aimed at properly greeting and integrating new Soldiers. The program dates back more than 170 years -- to 1836 -- and continues in Iraq. “Once (new Soldiers) get here everyone is a ‘Dragoon,’” said Lt. Col. Bryan Denny, 2nd SCR deputy commander. “This is just our way of integrating new troops into the regiment. SGT 1ST CLASS KAP KIM While the Soldiers come from different places -- Spc. Jenny Etheridge, a medic with U.S. geographically and career-wise -- but everyone is Army Europe's 6th Squadron, 2nd Stryker given the same hardy welcome and introduction. Cavalry Regiment, demonstrates the proper way to insert a nasopharyngeal airway with the help of new “Dragoon” Spc. David Bailey “Most Soldiers come straight out of (Advanced of the 2nd's 4th Squadron, at Camp Liberty, Individual Training) and a lot of NCOs have never Iraq during the unit's "School of the Trooper" been in a Stryker regiment before,” said Denny.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Officer Career Path Proposed November 13, 2018
    South Carolina Department of Public Safety Law Enforcement Officer Career Path Proposed November 13, 2018 As SCDPS strives to ensure the safety of South Carolina citizens and visitors, its law enforcement personnel resources are diminishing in terms of trained, experienced troopers and officers accepting more lucrative offers from the private sector and other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. While the Department has made great strides in retaining law enforcement officers, its best efforts have resulted in merely attempting to maintain its workforce rather than growing it. Each time the department loses a seasoned trooper or officer, it loses years of quantifiable experience, and tens of thousands of dollars in training. The department, state government, and South Carolina citizens all benefit from retention and maintenance of SCDPS’ current qualified and well-trained law enforcement officers. It is important to place as many troopers and officers as possible on South Carolina roadways and other assigned locations; however, it is even more significant for these troopers and officers to be competent, experienced, and knowledgeable. It is the priority of the South Carolina Department of Public Safety (SCDPS, Department, or DPS) to retain its current knowledge and experience base by providing a career path and retention plan for its law enforcement officers. In 2004, the South Carolina Highway Patrol proposed its 2004 budget to the governor with a priority of funding the “Highway Patrol Pay Realignment Plan.” The plan would have re-aligned salaries throughout all ranks and provided a career path for supervisors and non-supervisors. However instead of realigning salaries, the final budget contained a 3% across-the-board increase for all state employees and a legislative mandate requiring the (then) Budget and Control Board to convene a study of the southeastern average pay for all law enforcement officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 55 Issue 1
    FLYING WHEEL Vol. 55 No. 1 January - March 2017 4. NEWS Canine graduation, recognition awards and a technology upgrade. 6. DRUM & BUGLE CORPS The Drum and Bugle Corps celebrates its 50th Anniversary this year. 8. FEATURE PROGRAM 4 Operation T.R.I.A.D.D. seeks to deter aggressive and dangerous driving through a concentrated effort in Ohio's largest urban areas. 10. LEADERSHIP AWARDS At a ceremony that honored many individuals for their hard work over the past year, the 2016 Ohio State Highway Patrol Leadership Awards concluded with Trooper Juan "Ray" Santiago’s selection as State Trooper of the Year. 20. AROUND THE STATE 6 8 Traffic safety partnerships, charitable activities, speech details, special events, retiree gatherings and more – see what’s happening in your area of the state. 10 20 ON THE COVER Trooper Juan "Ray" Santiago is the 2016 State Trooper of the Year. Please see story on page 10 to see everyone recognized at the 2016 Leadership Awards. OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL Colonel’s Letter I recently told the commanders 2017 would be fast paced, and it has been! When I think about what we have accomplished so far this year and what we have planned through December, one theme comes to mind: we have to “stay in the gas!” Last year was a great year to reflect on, especially with those who separated themselves from their peers and helped the Division accomplish our goals. Those individuals were recognized at this year’s Leadership Awards (see feature story, page 10). Look to them for examples of hard work and excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of State Police Rules & Regulations
    Department of State Police Rules & Regulations Effective Date Number January 31, 2001 Article 1 Subject REGULATIONS FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF THE STATE POLICE 1.0 REGULATIONS FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF THE STATE POLICE 1.1 AUTHORIZATION AND SEVERABILITY For the purpose of these Rules and Regulations the Massachusetts Department of State Police shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Massachusetts State Police". Uniformed members shall hereinafter be referred to as "members". The Massachusetts State Police's Rules and Regulations are issued pursuant to Massachusetts General Law Chapter 22C. These Rules and Regulations cancel and supersede all previous Massachusetts State Police Rules and Regulations. Causes of actions arising from events transpiring prior to March 19, 1997, shall be governed by Rules and Regulations then in effect. If any article, section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Rules and Regulations is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, contrary to law, or otherwise inoperative, such decision shall not affect the validity of any other part of these Rules and Regulations. 1.2 INTRODUCTION In the United States it is essential that the Criminal Justice System, upon which public safety depends, be administered in a manner which promotes public respect, confidence and acceptance. The problems associated with the delivery of police services are many, as they reflect the complex interactions and changes of modern society. Accordingly, rules cannot be drafted that shall prescribe, in specific detail, the manner in which all duties of Massachusetts State Police officers are to be performed. Consequently, all members should be guided in their decision making processes by subscribing to certain fundamental principles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Washington State Patrol Compensation Survey
    2020 Washington State Patrol Compensation Survey State law requires the Office of Financial Management to create this report (Revised Code of Washington 41.06.167, 41.56.475 and 43.43.380) State Human Resources Office of Financial Management April 2020 To accommodate persons with disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats by calling the Office of Financial Management at 360-902-0599. TTY/TDD users should contact OFM via the Washington Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-833-6388. Visit our website at www.ofm.wa.gov. WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 2020 COMPENSATION SURVEY Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Who participated .....................................................................................................................3 What jobs we compared ..........................................................................................................3 What market data we used ......................................................................................................3 How we compared base pay ...................................................................................................4 How agencies use an education incentive ............................................................................... 5 Longevity Premiums ................................................................................................................5 Premium pay ...........................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Army Abbreviations
    Army Abbreviations Abbreviation Rank Descripiton 1LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1SG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST BGLR FIRST BUGLER 1ST COOK FIRST COOK 1ST CORP FIRST CORPORAL 1ST LEADER FIRST LEADER 1ST LIEUT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST LIEUT ADC FIRST LIEUTENANT AIDE-DE-CAMP 1ST LIEUT ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT ASST SURG FIRST LIEUTENANT ASSISTANT SURGEON 1ST LIEUT BN ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT BATTALION ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT REGTL QTR FIRST LIEUTENANT REGIMENTAL QUARTERMASTER 1ST LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST MUS FIRST MUSICIAN 1ST OFFICER FIRST OFFICER 1ST SERG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST SGT FIRST SERGEANT 2 CL PVT SECOND CLASS PRIVATE 2 CL SPEC SECOND CLASS SPECIALIST 2D CORP SECOND CORPORAL 2D LIEUT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2D SERG SECOND SERGEANT 2LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2ND LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 3 CL SPEC THIRD CLASS SPECIALIST 3D CORP THIRD CORPORAL 3D LIEUT THIRD LIEUTENANT 3D SERG THIRD SERGEANT 3RD OFFICER THIRD OFFICER 4 CL SPEC FOURTH CLASS SPECIALIST 4 CORP FOURTH CORPORAL 5 CL SPEC FIFTH CLASS SPECIALIST 6 CL SPEC SIXTH CLASS SPECIALIST ACTG HOSP STEW ACTING HOSPITAL STEWARD ADC AIDE-DE-CAMP ADJT ADJUTANT ARMORER ARMORER ART ARTIF ARTILLERY ARTIFICER ARTIF ARTIFICER ASST BAND LDR ASSISTANT BAND LEADER ASST ENGR CAC ASSISTANT ENGINEER ASST QTR MR ASSISTANT QUARTERMASTER ASST STEWARD ASSISTANT STEWARD ASST SURG ASSISTANT SURGEON AUX 1 CL SPEC AUXILARY 1ST CLASS SPECIALIST AVN CADET AVIATION CADET BAND CORP BAND CORPORAL BAND LDR BAND LEADER BAND SERG BAND SERGEANT BG BRIGADIER GENERAL BGLR BUGLER BGLR 1 CL BUGLER 1ST CLASS BLKSMITH BLACKSMITH BN COOK BATTALION COOK BN
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER NO. 59 SUBJECT: Chaplain Corps TO
    ORDER NO. 59 SUBJECT: Chaplain Corps TO: Members of the Department This Order establishes department policy and member responsibilities for the following: Section 59.1 CHAPLAIN CORPS 1 59.1.1. Qualifications and Appointment 1 59.1.2. Chaplain Corps Organization 3 59.1.3. Chaplains’ Duties and Responsibilities 4 59.1.4. Uniforms 4 59.1.5. Ride-Along Policy 5 59.1.6. Department Command Liaisons’ Responsibilities 6 Section 59.2 REVISION RESPONSIBILITY 6 59.1 CHAPLAIN CORPS This Order establishes a Chaplain Corps and outlines the organizational structure of the Corps, as well as the functions and services provided. The Chaplain Corps is comprised of chaplains who provide pastoral services to members of the department (enlisted and civilian) and their families, participate in department ceremonies and meetings, accompany enforcement members on duty, and perform other related services. When requested, they may also counsel members and their families, visit sick or injured members, perform wedding ceremonies, and officiate at department funerals. Chaplains are available to assist members at any time, during any tragedy or emergency. 59.1.1. QUALIFICATIONS AND APPOINTMENT A. Chaplains are volunteers appointed at the discretion of, and serving at the pleasure of, the Director. Selections shall be made from interested clergy recommended and endorsed by work unit commanders followed by an application process which shall include the following: 2 Official Order No. 59 (1) Experience and Education Questionnaire (PD-100) (2) Criminal history and traffic history check (3) Background investigation consistent with the enlisted member pre-employment process (4) Approval of Chaplain Corps Executive Board (5) Appointment by the Director (6) Attendance at Spring or Fall Chaplains Conference (7) Official swearing in at a Recognition Ceremony B.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 49 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2010 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice8President Air 2arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KC3 C3E AFC Committee Chairman Air 7ice82arshal N 3 3aldwin C3 C3E 7ice8Chairman -roup Captain 9 D Heron O3E Secretary -roup Captain K 9 Dearman FRAeS 2embership Secretary Dr 9ack Dunham PhD CPsychol A2RAeS Treasurer 9 3oyes TD CA 2embers Air Commodore - R Pitchfork 23E 3A FRAes ,in Commander C Cummin s :9 S Cox Esq 3A 2A :A72 P Dye O3E 3Sc(En ) CEn AC-I 2RAeS :-roup Captain 2 I Hart 2A 2A 2Phil RAF :,in Commander C Hunter 22DS RAF Editor & Publications ,in Commander C - 9efford 23E 3A 2ana er :Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS THE PRE8,AR DE7E.OP2ENT OF DO2INION AIR 7 FORCES by Sebastian Cox ANS,ERIN- THE @O.D COUNTRABSB CA.. by , Cdr 11 Colin Cummin s ‘REPEAT, PLEASE!’ PO.ES AND CCECHOS.O7AKS IN 35 THE 3ATT.E OF 3RITAIN by Peter Devitt A..IES AT ,ARE THE RAF AND THE ,ESTERN 51 EUROPEAN AIR FORCES, 1940845 by Stuart Hadaway 2ORNIN- G&A 76 INTERNATIONA.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Public Safety T R O O P E R
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY T R O O P E R QUALIFICATIONS Applicants must be of good moral character, a citizen of the United States and must be 21 upon graduating from the training academy (no maximum age limit). Vision and color blindness will be evaluated and can be a disqualifier. Education: Sixty (60) earned college credit hours or an Associates Degree from a regional accredited college/university, or 24 months of US Military active duty experience, or equivalent police/federal law enforcement experience. College hours can be waived with US Military active duty experience, or equivalent police/federal law enforcement experience. EMPLOYMENT Contact a Regional Recruiter for application information or go to www.joindps.com. Successfully tested and polygraphed applicants will have a thorough character investigation and an oral interview. A physical examination, vision test and psychological test will be arranged for those who are given a conditional job offer. TRAINING Cadets will be assigned to Austin for a 21 to 26 week Licensed Peace Officer training school at the DPS Law Enforcement Academy. The length of the recruit school will vary depending on the size of the class. The training is designed to equip cadets to handle any of the various situations they may encounter as a State Trooper which will start them on a rewarding career in law enforcement. All cadets successfully completing the DPS Academy will be required to pass a written licensing test administered by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (if applicable) and the Department’s physical readiness test. BENEFITS State troopers receive additional hazardous duty pay for each year of service.
    [Show full text]