Review of Mine Water Reports in the Hotazel, Kathu and Postmasburg Areas, Northern Cape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Mine Water Reports in the Hotazel, Kathu and Postmasburg Areas, Northern Cape Review of mine water reports in the Hotazel, Kathu and Postmasburg areas, Northern Cape Dr. Kevin Pietersen with contributions from Zaheed Gaffoor Reviewer: Dr. Hans Beekman Client: Agri Northern Cape November 2017 Final Report Review of mine water reports in the Hotazel, Kathu and Postmasburg areas, Northern Cape EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since the 1930s there have been numerous investigations to better understand the hydrogeology of the Hotazel, Kathu (Sishen) and Postmasburg areas in the Northern Cape. There have been concerns about the dewatering operations of the Sishen Iron Mine but there has been limited consideration in the studies of the cumulative dewatering impact of all water users: agriculture, mining, (proposed) solar power generation facilities and water supply, in the region – so called cumulative management. This has led to concerns about the sustainability of groundwater abstractions in the region. This study was a desk-top review of groundwater literature with the aim to understand the issues in more detail. The most significant impact of the mines in the region has been the dewatering of the aquifers. The sources of water for dewatering are the banded iron formations (BIF) and dolomites of the Ghaap Group. To predict changes in hydrogeological conditions resulting from mine dewatering, the mines have constructed groundwater models at a local scale with limited consideration of a broader perspective, i.e. a regional and holistic approach. A regional and holistic approach allows for the assessment and evaluation of the combined effect of abstractions of all stakeholders on the groundwater resources and ultimately allows for appropriate groundwater management interventions. Note that the groundwater modelling studies in the area were commissioned by the mines and are not easily available in the public domain. The extent of the dewatering zones of the Sishen Iron Ore Mine has been investigated extensively, whilst for the other mines in the region there were no such detailed investigations accessible. Groundwater discharge processes include evaporation and transpiration of groundwater, and groundwater flow to the surface (seepage), including discharge to wetlands and rivers and subsurface drainage. In semi-arid areas with relatively low rainfall, quantification of groundwater recharge is complex because its rate is only a very small fraction of the water balance (usually less than 5% of the average annual rainfall). Recharge events in such environments are predominantly episodic or intermittent. This means that rainfall is percolating to the water table only during extreme (surplus) rainfall events. The dewatering of the aquifer systems means that flowing springs disappear and i baseflow is absent, giving rise to dry river beds (e.g. the Gamagara River). There seems to be no major visible discharge areas in the aquifer systems except for possible discharge zones in the Skeifontein Spruit. The natural groundwater drainage is from the eastern catchment boundary (recharge area) in the east (Kuruman Hills) towards the outflow area at Dibeng. Recharge can be local and indirect and is also induced as a result of the dewatering activities. The Gamagara River is a gaining river outside the zone of dewatering. Inside the dewatered zone (Moria to Demaneng and Demaneng to Mokaning), the Gamagara River is a losing stream (recharging the aquifer). The aquifer is over-exploited (abstraction from the aquifer exceeds sustainable rates). Discharge areas are difficult to identify as the compartments are dewatered so the open pits are sinks to groundwater flow in the region. The absence of a holistic and integrated regional study makes it difficult to evaluate the implications of large-scale groundwater abstraction on competing users. There are concerns from stakeholders that water use licenses are issued without due regard of the cumulative impact of these abstractions on the groundwater resources. The catchments are water stressed (see reserve determinations). The water (consumption) footprint is dominated by demand from the mining sector, followed by Local Municipalities, agricultural sector and power generation. The challenge remains not only the provision of adequate volumes of water for local economic development but also taking into account spatial and temporal requirements. Only few studies have been conducted to understand the cumulative implications of mine dewatering and large-scale abstraction on competing groundwater users. The decision-making framework developed by Seyler et al. [1] together with the groundwater governance frameworks developed by Pietersen et al. [2,3] was used as a basis for analysis of the sustainability of the resource. The analysis revealed the following: The current use of groundwater is unsustainable. In the catchments there are competing demands for groundwater consumption, i.e. water supply for domestic and industrial use and for agricultural purposes. Inspections and investigations by Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) indicated that a number of mines in the region are operating without the needed water use authorizations. The management of the groundwater resources must take into consideration not only technical issues but also social and environmental aspects. The framework categories identified in the table below were adapted to the local situation to analyse the sustainability provisions for groundwater management in the region. In undertaking the analysis, any areas where parts of the sustainability provisions are not addressed represent a ‘gap’. The analysis reflected in the table is based on ii numerous sources of information being provided and which were compiled, reviewed, and mined using a framework analysis. Each of the identified gaps was categorised and colour-coded to reflect the magnitude of the gap: (a) green (3) – criteria are met; (b) amber (2) – criteria partially met; (c) red (1) – significant gap or absent. Table: Framework for analysis of sustainability provisions. Capacity Criterion Context Gap Technical Basic hydrogeological maps For identification of groundwater 3 resources Groundwater body/aquifer delineation With classification of typology 3 Availability of aquifer numerical At least preliminary for strategic critical 3 ‘management models’ aquifers Change in natural discharge Detection of change in water table 2 towards discharge point Assessment of discharge 2 Flow in discharge-receiving 2 environment Chemical composition of discharge- 1 receiving environment Change in pre-abstraction recharge Detection of change in water table 2 towards recharge zone Direct detection of change in water 2 table in recharge zone Indirect detection of change in water 1 table in recharge zone Assessment of surface water flows in 2 recharge zone Chemical tracer for recharge source 1 Increased recharge 2 Change in storage Detection of change in water table 2 Response time/status of aquifer Age of water 1 towards new dynamic equilibrium Quantification of the relationship The shape, gradient and scales of the between increasing abstraction and curves will vary for each system 2 reducing discharge and other aquifer flows Recovery assessment If this is very long, then the flows at a reasonable water supply planning and 1 environmental timescale should be determined Legal and Water well drilling permits & For large users, with interests of small 2 institutional groundwater use rights users noted Instruments to reduce groundwater Water well closure/constraint in critical 1 abstraction areas Instruments to prevent water well In overexploited or polluted areas 1 construction Sanction for illegal water well Penalizing excessive pumping above 1 operation permit Groundwater abstraction & use ‘Resource charge’ on larger users 1 charging Land use control on potentially Prohibition or restriction since 2 polluting activities groundwater hazard Levies on generation/discharge of Providing incentives for pollution 1 potential pollutants prevention Government agency as ‘groundwater Empowered to act on cross-sectoral 2 resource guardian’ basis Community aquifer management Mobilising and formalising community 2 organisations participation Cross-Sector Coordination with agricultural, mineral Ensuring ‘real water saving’ and 2 Policy and social development pollution control Coordination Groundwater based urban/industrial To conserve and protect groundwater 2 planning resources Compensation for groundwater Related to constraints on land-use 2 protection activities iii Capacity Criterion Context Gap Operational Public participation in groundwater Effective in control of exploitation and 1 management pollution Existence of groundwater With measures and instruments 2 management action plan agreed This analysis has highlighted gaps that need to be addressed to support sustainable development of groundwater resources in the region. The indicators which are not met focus on priority interventions. An approach similar to a strategic environmental assessment is required to analyse the cumulative impact of large-scale groundwater dewatering and abstraction on groundwater users and environment. The groundwater resources and particularly the dolomite aquifers are at risk of being dewatered unless regulations are enforced. Based on the evaluation of numerous reports and the gap analysis, I would recommend to: Establish a groundwater monitoring network that takes into account monitoring of recharge and discharge areas; Establish a standardised regional digital relational database that combines data from all water
Recommended publications
  • Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations
    SCOPING REPORT FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATIONS UMK Mine, near Hotazel APRIL 2021 SUBMITTED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 107 OF 1998, AS AMENDED) AND THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WASTE ACT (ACT 59 OF 2008, AS AMENDED) IN RESPECT OF LISTED ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE BEEN TRIGGERED BY APPLICATIONS IN TERMS OF THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT (ACT 28 OF 2002) (AS AMENDED) Name of applicant: United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd Tel no: (011) 217 2800 Fax no: (011) 217 2801 Postal address: Postnet Suite 902, Private Bag X9, Benmore, 2010 Physical address: 44 Melrose Boulevard, Melrose Arch, 2196 File reference number SAMRAD: NC-00182-MR/102 SLR Project No.: 710.21002.00055 Report No.: 01 Revision No.: A April 2021 United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd SLR Project No: 710.21002.00055 Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations April 2021 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations Project Manager Sharon Meyer Project Manager Email [email protected] Author Sharon Meyer, Reinett Mogotshi Reviewer Ed Perry Keywords Keywords; Status Draft Scoping Report for public review DEA Reference DEA Ref: N/A DMRE Reference NC-00182-MR/102 DWS Reference DWS Ref: N/A Report No. 01 SLR Company SLR Consulting (Africa)(Pty)Ltd DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD Rev Issue Date Description Issued By No. A April 2021 Draft Scoping Report issued for public review SM BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by an SLR Group company with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Review Idp 2016-2017
    ; FINAL APPROVED FOURTHFF REVIEWED IDP IDP DOCUMENT 2016-2017 i | Page: Final Approved Fourth Reviewed IDP 2016 - 2017 Table of Contents Foreword by the Mayor .......................................................................................................... v Foreword by the Municipal Manager ................................................................................ vii Executive summary ................................................................................................................ ix Acronyms ................................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1.................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ...…………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Guiding Principles……………………………………………………………………………...1 1.2.1 National Government’s outcomes based on delivery .................................... 2 1.2.2 National Development Plan ................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 CoGTA- National KPA's for municipalities .......................................................... 2 1.2.4. New Growth Path………………………………………………………………………..2 1.2.5 Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development framework(2012)…………….3 1.2.6 Northern Cape Growth and Development Strategy……………………………...3
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Northern Cape Province
    Section B:Section Profile B:Northern District HealthCape Province Profiles 14 Northern Cape Province John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality (DC45) Overview of the district The John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipalitya (previously Kgalagadi) is a Category C municipality located in the north of the Northern Cape Province, bordering Botswana in the west. It comprises the three local municipalities of Gamagara, Ga- Segonyana and Joe Morolong, and 186 towns and settlements, of which the majority (80%) are villages. The boundaries of this district were demarcated in 2006 to include the once north-western part of Joe Morolong and Olifantshoek, along with its surrounds, into the Gamagara Local Municipality. It has an established rail network from Sishen South and between Black Rock and Dibeng. It is characterised by a mixture of land uses, of which agriculture and mining are dominant. The district holds potential as a viable tourist destination and has numerous growth opportunities in the industrial sector. Area: 27 322km² Population (2016)b: 238 306 Population density (2016): 8.7 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 14.5% Cities/Towns: Bankhara-Bodulong, Deben, Hotazel, Kathu, Kuruman, Mothibistad, Olifantshoek, Santoy, Van Zylsrus. Main Economic Sectors: Agriculture, mining, retail. Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Process and Public Participation Process
    SITE NOTICES HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 PROOF OF SITE NOTICES (Date placed: 03 October 2018) Figure 1: Site notice placed on a boundary fence at the start point of Access Road Alternative 2 along the existing T25 gravel road (27°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 1 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 2: Site notice placed at the T-junction between the existing T26 gravel road and the N14 national route (25°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 2 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 3: Site notice placed on the boundary fence of the Remaining Extent of the Farm Lyndoch 423 (i.e. the project site) (27°34'12.09"S; 23°05'58.56"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 3 ADVERTISEMENTS ANNOUNCEMENT OF EIARs AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 1 AND 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Project Name: Applicant: DEA Reference Number Hyperion Solar Development 1 Hyperion Solar Development 1 (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1109 Hyperion Solar Development 2 Cyraguard (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1110 Proposed Activity: The construction of two (2) separate photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities (SEFs) each with a contracted capacity of up to 75MW.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL and LABOUR PLAN for SOUTH32 Hotazel Manganese Mines
    SOCIAL AND LABOUR PLAN FOR SOUTH32 Hotazel Manganese Mines July 2018 Mining Right Reference Number: NC 253 MR & NC 252 MR TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. INTRODUCTION AND PREAMBLE ........................................................................................... 8 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Preamble Information ............................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Mining Methodology .............................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Current and Expected Workforce ........................................................................................... 9 1.5 Local Recruitment ................................................................................................................... 9 2. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................ 12 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Skills Development Plan ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Education and Training ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 Draft Idp Gasegonyana Local
    2019/2020 DRAFT IDP GASEGONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality 2019/2020 Draft IDP Page 1 Table of Contents Section A .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Vision of Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Vision.................................................................................................................................8 1.1.2 Mission ..............................................................................................................................9 1.1.3 Values .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.4 Strategy Map ................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Who Are We? ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.2.1 The Strategic Perspective.................................................................................................. 15 1.3 Demographic Profile of the Municipality ................................................................................ 17 1.4 Powers and Functions of the Municipality .............................................................................. 27 1.5 Process followed to develop the IDP .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MANGANESE MATTERS a Metal of Consequence for Women and Communities in South Africa Affected by Mining and the Global Energy Transition
    MANGANESE MATTERS A metal of consequence for women and communities in South Africa affected by mining and the global energy transition June 2021 Y MININ MUNIT B G U OM IES ED N C U T IT D N C E E IT E D T C E F D I E F N F A I N A F N A C A E C T G I M T O N I I O O N N I N W M WAMUA MACUA NOTHING ABOUT US NOTHING ABOUT US WITHOUT US WITHOUT US MANGANESE MATTERS A metal of consequence for women and communities in South Africa affected by mining and the global energy transition MANGANESE MATTERS ActionAid Netherlands is part of the global ActionAid federation. ActionAid is a leading international human rights organisation working in over 45 countries with communities and local organisations, supporting them to claim their rights and build a life without poverty and injustice. With our grassroots experience, we demand progress from those in power at local, national and international levels to build lasting change. The Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) is a critical, independent, not-for-profit knowledge centre on multinationals. Since 1973 we have investigated multinational corporations and the impact of their activities on people and the environment. Manganese Matters, ActionAid Netherlands Published | 16 June Authors | Alejandro González, Joseph Wilde-Ramsing (SOMO), Phyllia Ngoatje, Nicola Soekoe, Fatima Vally (MACUA/WAMUA), Sophie Kwizera, Sifiso Dladla (ActionAid) Editing | Iris Maher Design | Diewertje van Wering Vuyiswa Nombesi looks through the window of her two-bedroom house built with materials that contain asbestos.
    [Show full text]
  • Weak Hydrothermal Carbonation of the Ongeluk Volcanics
    Shibuya et al. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2017) 4:31 Progress in Earth and DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0145-6 Planetary Science RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Weak hydrothermal carbonation of the Ongeluk volcanics: evidence for low CO2 concentrations in seawater and atmosphere during the Paleoproterozoic global glaciation Takazo Shibuya1,2,3*, Tsuyoshi Komiya4, Ken Takai1,2,3, Shigenori Maruyama5,7 and Michael J. Russell6 Abstract It was previously revealed that the total CO2 concentration in seawater decreased during the Late Archean. In this paper, to assess the secular change of total CO2 concentration in seawater, we focused on the Paleoproterozoic era when the Earth experienced its first recorded global glaciation. The 2.4 Ga Ongeluk Formation outcrops in the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. The formation consists mainly of submarine volcanic rocks that have erupted during the global glaciation. The undeformed lavas are mostly carbonate-free but contain rare disseminated calcites. The 13 carbon isotope ratio of the disseminated calcite (δ Ccc vs. VPDB) ranges from − 31.9 to − 13.2 ‰. The relatively low 13 13 δ Ccc values clearly indicate that the carbonation was partially contributed by C-depleted CO2 derived from 13 decomposition of organic matter beneath the seafloor. The absence of δ Ccc higher than − 13.2‰ is consistent 13 with the exceptionally C-depleted CO2 in the Ongeluk seawater during glaciation. The results suggest that carbonation occurred during subseafloor hydrothermal circulation just after the eruption of the lavas. Previously, it was reported that the carbonate content in the uppermost subseafloor crust decreased from 3.2 to 2.6 Ga, indicating a decrease in total CO2 concentration in seawater during that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Assessment Report and Enviromental Mangement
    SECTION 24G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE MAMATWAN MINE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW SUBMITTED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 107 OF 1998), AS AMENDED IN RESPECT OF A SECTION 24G RECTIFICATION PROCESS FOR LISTED ACTIVITIES THAT COMMENCED WITHOUT ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION NAME OF APPLICANT: HOTAZEL MANGANESE MINES (PTY) LTD TEL NO: 053 742 2300 FAX NO: 086 664 8458 POSTAL ADDRESS: PO BOX 61820, MARSHALLTOWN, 2107 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 1 PEPERBOOM AVENUE, HOTAZEL, 8490 FILE REFERENCE NUMBER SAMRAD: NC00170MR102 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.000002 Report No.: 1 Revision No.: 1 August 2020 South32 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.00002 Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Mamatwan Mine August 2020 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Mamatwan Mine Project Manager Natasha Smyth Project Manager Email [email protected] Author Natasha Smyth Reviewer Rob Hounsome Keywords MMT, Manganese, South32, Section 24G Status Final for review and comment DEA Reference N/A DMR Reference To be provided DWS Reference N/A Report No. 1 SLR Company SLR Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd REPORT COMPILATION REPORT COMPILED BY: Natasha Smyth REPORT REVIEWED BY: Rob Hounsome ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… Natasha Smyth Rob Hounsome Environmental Assessment Practitioner Reviewer One REPORT REVIEWED BY: Alex Pheiffer ………………………………………………… Alex Pheiffer Reviewer Two 2020-07-31-S24G-Mamatwan-Final for public review South32 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.00002 Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Mamatwan Mine August 2020 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by an SLR Group company with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with South32 for part or all of the services it has been appointed by South32 to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socio-Economic Wellbeing of Small Mining Towns in the Northern Cape
    THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC WELLBEING OF SMALL MINING TOWNS IN THE NORTHERN CAPE by Avril Edward Mathew Gardiner Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Professor SE Donaldson Department of Geography and Environmental Studies March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii DECLARATION By submitting this report electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained herein is my own original work, that I am the sole author (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication hereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights, and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za iii ABSTRACT With South Africa being a developing country in many respects, the management of natural resources is of high importance. It should therefore be determined how these resources are managed and what happens to the capital generated by the extraction of these resources. The resource curse hypothesis will be used as a base to understand why there are so many underdeveloped communities in places where these resources are extracted. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature and extent of the economic and social conditions of the communities of small mining towns in the Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan Gamagara Local Municipality
    Year: 2017-2022 Integrated Development Plan Gamagara Local Municipality i | Page: DRAFT IDP 2017 - 2022 Table of Contents Foreword by the Mayor ......................................................................................................... v Foreword by the Municipal Manager ................................................................................ vii Executive summary ................................................................................................................ ix Acronyms .................................................................................................................................xii Chapter 1.................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Legislative Framework…….…………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Legislative Frameworks..……………………………………………………………………...1 1.2.1 Constitution of Republic Of South Africa (1996) ........................................................ 1 1.2.2 White Paper on Local Government (1998) ................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Municipal Systems Act ................................................................................................... 2 1.2.4. National Development Plan..……………………………………………………………..2 1.2.5 National Outcomes…………………………………………………………...…………….3 1.2.6 Provincial Spatial Development plan…………………………………………………...3
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phase 1 Hia Report for Proposed Prospecting On
    Comprehensive and Professional Solutions for all Heritage Related Matters CK 2006/014630/23 VAT NO.: 4360226270 PHASE 1 HIA REPORT FOR PROPOSED PROSPECTING ON THE FARM BOERDRAAI 228 NEAR HOTAZEL IN THE JOE MOROLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE For: SLR CONSULTING (PTY) LTD P.O.Box 1596 Cramerview 2060 REPORT: APAC019/119 by: A.J. Pelser Accredited member of ASAPA December 2019 P.O.BOX 73703 LYNNWOOD RIDGE 0040 Tel: 083 459 3091 Fax: 086 695 7247 Email: [email protected] Member: AJ Pelser BA (UNISA), BA (Hons) (Archaeology), MA (Archaeology) [WITS] 1 I hereby declare that I, Anton Johan Pelser, am an Independent Consultant with no vested interest in the Proposed Development other than being an Appointed Heritage Specialist to undertake a Specialist Assessment for the proposed development. Signed at Pretoria on this 1st day of December 2019 Anton Pelser ID Number: 711223 5283 088 2 ©Copyright APELSER ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTING The information contained in this report is the sole intellectual property of APELSER Archaeological Consulting. It may only be used for the purposes it was commissioned for by the client. DISCLAIMER: Although all efforts are made to identify all sites of cultural heritage (archaeological and historical) significance during an assessment of study areas, the nature of archaeological and historical sites are as such that it is always possible that hidden or subterranean sites, features or objects could be overlooked during the study. APELSER Archaeological Consulting can’t be held liable for such oversights or for costs incurred as a result thereof. Clients & Developers should not continue with any development actions until SAHRA or one of its subsidiary bodies has provided final comments on this report.
    [Show full text]