1 Phase 1 Hia Report for Proposed Prospecting On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Phase 1 Hia Report for Proposed Prospecting On Comprehensive and Professional Solutions for all Heritage Related Matters CK 2006/014630/23 VAT NO.: 4360226270 PHASE 1 HIA REPORT FOR PROPOSED PROSPECTING ON THE FARM BOERDRAAI 228 NEAR HOTAZEL IN THE JOE MOROLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE For: SLR CONSULTING (PTY) LTD P.O.Box 1596 Cramerview 2060 REPORT: APAC019/119 by: A.J. Pelser Accredited member of ASAPA December 2019 P.O.BOX 73703 LYNNWOOD RIDGE 0040 Tel: 083 459 3091 Fax: 086 695 7247 Email: [email protected] Member: AJ Pelser BA (UNISA), BA (Hons) (Archaeology), MA (Archaeology) [WITS] 1 I hereby declare that I, Anton Johan Pelser, am an Independent Consultant with no vested interest in the Proposed Development other than being an Appointed Heritage Specialist to undertake a Specialist Assessment for the proposed development. Signed at Pretoria on this 1st day of December 2019 Anton Pelser ID Number: 711223 5283 088 2 ©Copyright APELSER ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTING The information contained in this report is the sole intellectual property of APELSER Archaeological Consulting. It may only be used for the purposes it was commissioned for by the client. DISCLAIMER: Although all efforts are made to identify all sites of cultural heritage (archaeological and historical) significance during an assessment of study areas, the nature of archaeological and historical sites are as such that it is always possible that hidden or subterranean sites, features or objects could be overlooked during the study. APELSER Archaeological Consulting can’t be held liable for such oversights or for costs incurred as a result thereof. Clients & Developers should not continue with any development actions until SAHRA or one of its subsidiary bodies has provided final comments on this report. Submitting the report to SAHRA is the responsibility of the Client unless required of the Heritage Specialist as part of their appointment and Terms of Reference 3 SUMMARY A Pelser Archaeological Consulting (APAC) was appointed by SLR Consulting (Pty) Ltd to conduct a Phase 1 HIA for Khwara Manganese (Pty) Ltd’s proposed Iron Ore and Manganese prospecting on the farm Boerdraai 228. The prospecting and study area is located in the Joe Morolong Local Municipality, John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality of the Northern Cape Province. The area is situated approximately 27km north-west of the town of Hotazel. The prospecting activities will include non-invasive and invasive activities. Non-invasive activities will comprise analyzing existing core, ground penetrating radar and hand held ground magnetic mapping. Invasive activities would comprise drilling of four prospecting boreholes on the Boerdraai farm. Background research indicates that there are some cultural heritage sites and features in the larger geographical area within which the study area falls, while no known sites are known for the specific study area. The assessment of the specific study area identified some sites, features or material of cultural heritage (archaeological and/or historical) origin and significance including some Stone Age and recent historical sites. This report discusses the results of both the background research and physical assessment and provides recommendations on the way forward at the end. From a Cultural Heritage point of view it is recommended that the proposed prospecting activities be allowed to continue once the recommended mitigation measures put forward at the end of the report have been implemented. 4 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................. 6 3. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS................................................................................... 6 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 9 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA ..................................................................................... 10 6. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 16 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 30 8. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 32 APPENDIX A: DEFINITION OF TERMS:............................................................................ 35 APPENDIX B: DEFINITION/ STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE................ 36 APPENDIX C: SIGNIFICANCE AND FIELD RATING: ..................................................... 37 APPENDIX D: PROTECTION OF HERITAGE RESOURCES:........................................... 38 APPENDIX E: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PHASES .......................................... 39 5 1. INTRODUCTION A Pelser Archaeological Consulting (APAC) was appointed by SLR Consulting (Pty) Ltd to conduct a Phase 1 HIA for Khwara Manganese (Pty) Ltd’s proposed Iron Ore and Manganese prospecting on the farm Boerdraai 228. The prospecting and study area is located in the Joe Morolong Local Municipality, John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality of the Northern Cape Province. The area is situated approximately 27km north-west of the town of Hotazel. The prospecting activities will include non-invasive and invasive activities. Non-invasive activities will comprise analyzing existing core, ground penetrating radar and hand held ground magnetic mapping. Invasive activities would comprise drilling of four prospecting boreholes on the Boerdraai farm. Background research indicates that there are some cultural heritage sites and features in the larger geographical area within which the study area falls, while no known sites are known for the specific study area. The assessment of the specific study area identified some sites, features or material of cultural heritage (archaeological and/or historical) origin and significance including some Stone Age and recent historical sites. The client indicated the location and boundaries of the study area and the assessment concentrated on this portion. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The Terms of Reference for the study was to: 1. Identify all objects, sites, occurrences and structures of an archaeological or historical nature (cultural heritage sites) located on the portion of land that will be impacted upon by the proposed development; 2. Assess the significance of the cultural resources in terms of their archaeological, historical, scientific, social, religious, aesthetic and tourism value; 3. Describe the possible impact of the proposed development on these cultural remains, according to a standard set of conventions; 4. Propose suitable mitigation measures to minimize possible negative impacts on the cultural resources; 5. Review applicable legislative requirements; 3. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS Aspects concerning the conservation of cultural resources are dealt with mainly in two acts. These are the National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999) and the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998). 6 3.1. The National Heritage Resources Act According to the above-mentioned act the following is protected as cultural heritage resources: a. Archaeological artifacts, structures and sites older than 100 years b. Ethnographic art objects (e.g. prehistoric rock art) and ethnography c. Objects of decorative and visual arts d. Military objects, structures and sites older than 75 years e. Historical objects, structures and sites older than 60 years f. Proclaimed heritage sites g. Grave yards and graves older than 60 years h. Meteorites and fossils i. Objects, structures and sites of scientific or technological value. The National Estate includes the following: a. Places, buildings, structures and equipment of cultural significance b. Places to which oral traditions are attached or which are associated with living heritage c. Historical settlements and townscapes d. Landscapes and features of cultural significance e. Geological sites of scientific or cultural importance f. Sites of Archaeological and palaeontological importance g. Graves and burial grounds h. Sites of significance relating to the history of slavery i. Movable objects (e.g. archaeological, palaeontological, meteorites, geological specimens, military, ethnographic, books etc.) A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is the process to be followed in order to determine whether any heritage resources are located within the area to be developed as well as the possible impact of the proposed development thereon. An Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) only looks at archaeological resources. An HIA must be done under the following circumstances: a. The construction of a linear development (road, wall, power line, canal etc.) exceeding 300m in length b. The construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50m in length c. Any development or other activity that will change the character of a site and exceed 5 000m2 or involve three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof d. Re-zoning of a site exceeding 10 000 m2 e. Any other category provided for in the regulations of SAHRA or a provincial heritage authority 7 Structures Section 34 (1) of the mentioned act states that no person may demolish any structure or part thereof which is older than 60 years without a permit issued by the relevant provincial heritage resources authority. A structure means any building, works,
Recommended publications
  • Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations
    SCOPING REPORT FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATIONS UMK Mine, near Hotazel APRIL 2021 SUBMITTED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 107 OF 1998, AS AMENDED) AND THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WASTE ACT (ACT 59 OF 2008, AS AMENDED) IN RESPECT OF LISTED ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE BEEN TRIGGERED BY APPLICATIONS IN TERMS OF THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT (ACT 28 OF 2002) (AS AMENDED) Name of applicant: United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd Tel no: (011) 217 2800 Fax no: (011) 217 2801 Postal address: Postnet Suite 902, Private Bag X9, Benmore, 2010 Physical address: 44 Melrose Boulevard, Melrose Arch, 2196 File reference number SAMRAD: NC-00182-MR/102 SLR Project No.: 710.21002.00055 Report No.: 01 Revision No.: A April 2021 United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd SLR Project No: 710.21002.00055 Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations April 2021 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title Scoping Report for the Amendment of the Environmental Management Programme and Related Environmental Authorisations Project Manager Sharon Meyer Project Manager Email [email protected] Author Sharon Meyer, Reinett Mogotshi Reviewer Ed Perry Keywords Keywords; Status Draft Scoping Report for public review DEA Reference DEA Ref: N/A DMRE Reference NC-00182-MR/102 DWS Reference DWS Ref: N/A Report No. 01 SLR Company SLR Consulting (Africa)(Pty)Ltd DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD Rev Issue Date Description Issued By No. A April 2021 Draft Scoping Report issued for public review SM BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by an SLR Group company with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Review Idp 2016-2017
    ; FINAL APPROVED FOURTHFF REVIEWED IDP IDP DOCUMENT 2016-2017 i | Page: Final Approved Fourth Reviewed IDP 2016 - 2017 Table of Contents Foreword by the Mayor .......................................................................................................... v Foreword by the Municipal Manager ................................................................................ vii Executive summary ................................................................................................................ ix Acronyms ................................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1.................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ...…………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Guiding Principles……………………………………………………………………………...1 1.2.1 National Government’s outcomes based on delivery .................................... 2 1.2.2 National Development Plan ................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 CoGTA- National KPA's for municipalities .......................................................... 2 1.2.4. New Growth Path………………………………………………………………………..2 1.2.5 Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development framework(2012)…………….3 1.2.6 Northern Cape Growth and Development Strategy……………………………...3
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Northern Cape Province
    Section B:Section Profile B:Northern District HealthCape Province Profiles 14 Northern Cape Province John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality (DC45) Overview of the district The John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipalitya (previously Kgalagadi) is a Category C municipality located in the north of the Northern Cape Province, bordering Botswana in the west. It comprises the three local municipalities of Gamagara, Ga- Segonyana and Joe Morolong, and 186 towns and settlements, of which the majority (80%) are villages. The boundaries of this district were demarcated in 2006 to include the once north-western part of Joe Morolong and Olifantshoek, along with its surrounds, into the Gamagara Local Municipality. It has an established rail network from Sishen South and between Black Rock and Dibeng. It is characterised by a mixture of land uses, of which agriculture and mining are dominant. The district holds potential as a viable tourist destination and has numerous growth opportunities in the industrial sector. Area: 27 322km² Population (2016)b: 238 306 Population density (2016): 8.7 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 14.5% Cities/Towns: Bankhara-Bodulong, Deben, Hotazel, Kathu, Kuruman, Mothibistad, Olifantshoek, Santoy, Van Zylsrus. Main Economic Sectors: Agriculture, mining, retail. Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Process and Public Participation Process
    SITE NOTICES HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 PROOF OF SITE NOTICES (Date placed: 03 October 2018) Figure 1: Site notice placed on a boundary fence at the start point of Access Road Alternative 2 along the existing T25 gravel road (27°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 1 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 2: Site notice placed at the T-junction between the existing T26 gravel road and the N14 national route (25°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 2 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 3: Site notice placed on the boundary fence of the Remaining Extent of the Farm Lyndoch 423 (i.e. the project site) (27°34'12.09"S; 23°05'58.56"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 3 ADVERTISEMENTS ANNOUNCEMENT OF EIARs AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 1 AND 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Project Name: Applicant: DEA Reference Number Hyperion Solar Development 1 Hyperion Solar Development 1 (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1109 Hyperion Solar Development 2 Cyraguard (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1110 Proposed Activity: The construction of two (2) separate photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities (SEFs) each with a contracted capacity of up to 75MW.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL and LABOUR PLAN for SOUTH32 Hotazel Manganese Mines
    SOCIAL AND LABOUR PLAN FOR SOUTH32 Hotazel Manganese Mines July 2018 Mining Right Reference Number: NC 253 MR & NC 252 MR TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. INTRODUCTION AND PREAMBLE ........................................................................................... 8 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Preamble Information ............................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Mining Methodology .............................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Current and Expected Workforce ........................................................................................... 9 1.5 Local Recruitment ................................................................................................................... 9 2. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................ 12 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Skills Development Plan ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Education and Training ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 Draft Idp Gasegonyana Local
    2019/2020 DRAFT IDP GASEGONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality 2019/2020 Draft IDP Page 1 Table of Contents Section A .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Vision of Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Vision.................................................................................................................................8 1.1.2 Mission ..............................................................................................................................9 1.1.3 Values .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.4 Strategy Map ................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Who Are We? ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.2.1 The Strategic Perspective.................................................................................................. 15 1.3 Demographic Profile of the Municipality ................................................................................ 17 1.4 Powers and Functions of the Municipality .............................................................................. 27 1.5 Process followed to develop the IDP .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MANGANESE MATTERS a Metal of Consequence for Women and Communities in South Africa Affected by Mining and the Global Energy Transition
    MANGANESE MATTERS A metal of consequence for women and communities in South Africa affected by mining and the global energy transition June 2021 Y MININ MUNIT B G U OM IES ED N C U T IT D N C E E IT E D T C E F D I E F N F A I N A F N A C A E C T G I M T O N I I O O N N I N W M WAMUA MACUA NOTHING ABOUT US NOTHING ABOUT US WITHOUT US WITHOUT US MANGANESE MATTERS A metal of consequence for women and communities in South Africa affected by mining and the global energy transition MANGANESE MATTERS ActionAid Netherlands is part of the global ActionAid federation. ActionAid is a leading international human rights organisation working in over 45 countries with communities and local organisations, supporting them to claim their rights and build a life without poverty and injustice. With our grassroots experience, we demand progress from those in power at local, national and international levels to build lasting change. The Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) is a critical, independent, not-for-profit knowledge centre on multinationals. Since 1973 we have investigated multinational corporations and the impact of their activities on people and the environment. Manganese Matters, ActionAid Netherlands Published | 16 June Authors | Alejandro González, Joseph Wilde-Ramsing (SOMO), Phyllia Ngoatje, Nicola Soekoe, Fatima Vally (MACUA/WAMUA), Sophie Kwizera, Sifiso Dladla (ActionAid) Editing | Iris Maher Design | Diewertje van Wering Vuyiswa Nombesi looks through the window of her two-bedroom house built with materials that contain asbestos.
    [Show full text]
  • Weak Hydrothermal Carbonation of the Ongeluk Volcanics
    Shibuya et al. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2017) 4:31 Progress in Earth and DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0145-6 Planetary Science RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Weak hydrothermal carbonation of the Ongeluk volcanics: evidence for low CO2 concentrations in seawater and atmosphere during the Paleoproterozoic global glaciation Takazo Shibuya1,2,3*, Tsuyoshi Komiya4, Ken Takai1,2,3, Shigenori Maruyama5,7 and Michael J. Russell6 Abstract It was previously revealed that the total CO2 concentration in seawater decreased during the Late Archean. In this paper, to assess the secular change of total CO2 concentration in seawater, we focused on the Paleoproterozoic era when the Earth experienced its first recorded global glaciation. The 2.4 Ga Ongeluk Formation outcrops in the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. The formation consists mainly of submarine volcanic rocks that have erupted during the global glaciation. The undeformed lavas are mostly carbonate-free but contain rare disseminated calcites. The 13 carbon isotope ratio of the disseminated calcite (δ Ccc vs. VPDB) ranges from − 31.9 to − 13.2 ‰. The relatively low 13 13 δ Ccc values clearly indicate that the carbonation was partially contributed by C-depleted CO2 derived from 13 decomposition of organic matter beneath the seafloor. The absence of δ Ccc higher than − 13.2‰ is consistent 13 with the exceptionally C-depleted CO2 in the Ongeluk seawater during glaciation. The results suggest that carbonation occurred during subseafloor hydrothermal circulation just after the eruption of the lavas. Previously, it was reported that the carbonate content in the uppermost subseafloor crust decreased from 3.2 to 2.6 Ga, indicating a decrease in total CO2 concentration in seawater during that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Assessment Report and Enviromental Mangement
    SECTION 24G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE MAMATWAN MINE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW SUBMITTED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 107 OF 1998), AS AMENDED IN RESPECT OF A SECTION 24G RECTIFICATION PROCESS FOR LISTED ACTIVITIES THAT COMMENCED WITHOUT ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION NAME OF APPLICANT: HOTAZEL MANGANESE MINES (PTY) LTD TEL NO: 053 742 2300 FAX NO: 086 664 8458 POSTAL ADDRESS: PO BOX 61820, MARSHALLTOWN, 2107 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 1 PEPERBOOM AVENUE, HOTAZEL, 8490 FILE REFERENCE NUMBER SAMRAD: NC00170MR102 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.000002 Report No.: 1 Revision No.: 1 August 2020 South32 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.00002 Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Mamatwan Mine August 2020 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Mamatwan Mine Project Manager Natasha Smyth Project Manager Email [email protected] Author Natasha Smyth Reviewer Rob Hounsome Keywords MMT, Manganese, South32, Section 24G Status Final for review and comment DEA Reference N/A DMR Reference To be provided DWS Reference N/A Report No. 1 SLR Company SLR Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd REPORT COMPILATION REPORT COMPILED BY: Natasha Smyth REPORT REVIEWED BY: Rob Hounsome ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… Natasha Smyth Rob Hounsome Environmental Assessment Practitioner Reviewer One REPORT REVIEWED BY: Alex Pheiffer ………………………………………………… Alex Pheiffer Reviewer Two 2020-07-31-S24G-Mamatwan-Final for public review South32 SLR Project No.: 720.19136.00002 Section 24G Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Mamatwan Mine August 2020 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by an SLR Group company with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with South32 for part or all of the services it has been appointed by South32 to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socio-Economic Wellbeing of Small Mining Towns in the Northern Cape
    THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC WELLBEING OF SMALL MINING TOWNS IN THE NORTHERN CAPE by Avril Edward Mathew Gardiner Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Professor SE Donaldson Department of Geography and Environmental Studies March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii DECLARATION By submitting this report electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained herein is my own original work, that I am the sole author (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication hereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights, and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za iii ABSTRACT With South Africa being a developing country in many respects, the management of natural resources is of high importance. It should therefore be determined how these resources are managed and what happens to the capital generated by the extraction of these resources. The resource curse hypothesis will be used as a base to understand why there are so many underdeveloped communities in places where these resources are extracted. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature and extent of the economic and social conditions of the communities of small mining towns in the Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan Gamagara Local Municipality
    Year: 2017-2022 Integrated Development Plan Gamagara Local Municipality i | Page: DRAFT IDP 2017 - 2022 Table of Contents Foreword by the Mayor ......................................................................................................... v Foreword by the Municipal Manager ................................................................................ vii Executive summary ................................................................................................................ ix Acronyms .................................................................................................................................xii Chapter 1.................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Legislative Framework…….…………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Legislative Frameworks..……………………………………………………………………...1 1.2.1 Constitution of Republic Of South Africa (1996) ........................................................ 1 1.2.2 White Paper on Local Government (1998) ................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Municipal Systems Act ................................................................................................... 2 1.2.4. National Development Plan..……………………………………………………………..2 1.2.5 National Outcomes…………………………………………………………...…………….3 1.2.6 Provincial Spatial Development plan…………………………………………………...3
    [Show full text]
  • John Taolo Gaetsewe Disrict Integrated Human Settlement Sector Plan
    Choose a building block. || JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECTOR PLAN FINAL REPORT 2019/20 JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECTOR PLAN 2019-2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over the past decades South Africa has embarked on building a better life for all by providing and basic services as constitutional requirements. In terms of Section 9 (1)(f) of the Housing Act, 1997 (Act No. 107 of 1997) “Every municipality must, as part of the municipality’s process of integrated development planning, take all reasonable and necessary steps within the framework of national and provincial housing legislation and policy to initiate, plan, co-ordinate, facilitate, promote and enable appropriate housing development in its area of jurisdiction”. Municipalities are expected to prepare and adopt Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) as the basis for planning and coordinating service delivery. Within the IDP certain sector plans also need to be prepared, and the Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan, is one of these. The Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan is part of the IDP process and stands as a chapter within a municipality’s IDP; it is not a stand-alone plan resulting from a separate planning process. The Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan aims to provide the strategic direction for transforming human settlements in the John Taolo Gaetsewe District aligned to the Provincial Department. This transformation relate to accelerating human settlement delivery on well-located land, that provide opportunities to beneficiaries to access the property market and have sufficient access to social amenities and economic opportunities. This transformation will further support the integration of communities and the spatial restructuring of the towns and villages in the Municipal area.
    [Show full text]