DOCSLIB.ORG

City Council Staff Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City Council Staff Report City Council Staff Report DATE: November 5,2014 AGENDA ITEM NO: Public Hearing Agenda Item 4-A. TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Smith, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 8 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code in its entirety regarding the regulation of animals within the City's jurisdiction and incorporation of Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Open a public hearing; take testimonial and documentary evidence; close the public hearing; 2. After considering the evidence, adopt an ordinance amending Title 8 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code. 3. Take such additional, related, action that may be desirable. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Monterey Park contracts with the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control (LACDACC) for supplemental Animal Control services. In order for LACDACC personnel to issue citations and take other regulatory actions, the City needs to amend Title 8 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code and Adopt Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code regarding the regulation of Animals. At the October 1, 2014 City Council meeting, the Council approved the introduction and waived first reading of the ordinance. The public hearing was set for November 5, 2014. The City complied with regulatory notice requirements by posting notice of the public hearing on October 16, 2014 and October 23, 2014 in the Monterey Park Progress newspaper. BACKGROUND: The City of Monterey Park has contracted with the LACDACC since 2012 for supplemental Animal Control services. However, LACDACC personnel who respond to Monterey Park for services requested that the City adopt, by reference, Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code to facilitate enforcement efforts. Adopting Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code will not enact certain regulations that the City previously rejected as undesirable such as mandatory cat licensing and mandatory spaying/neutering of all pets. Staff Report Page 2 The draft ordinance (Attachment 1), if adopted, would incorporate LA County Code Title 10 as indicated and would amend MPMC Title 8. FISCAL IMPACT: It is unknown at this time if there would be any fiscal impact. There may be additional fines levied or because of increased licensing enforcement and canvassing there could be an increase in the collection of licensing fees. Prepared by: ~~?-/ Steve C Clay Police Lieutenant APprorzLC£ ~ Paul L. Talbot City Manager ATTACHMMENTS 1. Proposed Ordinance ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY REGARDING THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION. The Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: A new Chapter 8.14 is added to Title 8 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code ("MPMC"), entitled County Regulations, to read as follows: "Chapter 8.14 INCORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS 8.14.010 INCORPORATION OF TITLE 10, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE: Pursuant to Government Code § 50022.9, the City Council incorporates Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code entitled Animals, subject to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth below, into this Code. The provisions of this Code take precedence over any conflicting provisions in Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code. 8.14.020 DELETIONS FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE. The following provisions of Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code are deleted: A. Chapter 10.04 entitled General Provisions; B. Section 10.08.155 in Chapter 10.08 entitled Definitions; C. Sections 10.20.030; 10.20.038; 10.20.045; 10.20.110; 10.20.185; 10.20.211 to 10.20.215; 10.20.262; 10.20.270; 10.20.350 to 10.20.385 in Chapter 10.20 entitled Dogs and Cats; and D. Section 10.36.340 to 10.36.380 in Chapter 10.36 entitled Impoundment. 8.14.030 AMENDMENTS TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE. The following provisions of Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code are amended to read as follows: 8.01 .10. Section 10.08.100. "Department" means the Monterey Park Police Department, or designee, or designee as determined by the Police Chief. 8.01.20. Section 10.08.110. "Director" means the police chief, or designee. 8.14.040 ADDITIONS TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE. The following sections are added to Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code: 8.01.10. Section 10.08.260. "Director of health services" means the police chief, or designee. 8.01.20. Section 10.08.270. "Sheriff," "sheriff deputy," and "sheriff officer" means police officer, or designee. 8.01.30. Section 10.08.280. "Tax collector" means the finance director, or designee. 8.14.050 GENERAL PENALTY: Any person violating any provision of this title is guilty of a misdemeanor unless otherwise provided in this title." SECTION 2: Title 8 of the MPMC, entitled Animals, is amended in its entirety to read as set forth in Exhibit "A," which is incorporated in its entirety as if fully set forth. SECTION 3: This Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) in that it is not a "project" for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by CEQA Guidelines § 15378. Specifically, this Ordinance constitutes creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. In addition, this Ordinance is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. Further, even if this Ordinance was deemed a "project" and therefore subject to CEQA, the Ordinance would be exempt as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3). SECTION 4: Repeal or amendment of any provision of the MPMC will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 6: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Monterey Park's book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 7: This Ordinance will become effective thirty days following its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of ____ 2014. Hans Liang, Mayor Attest: Vincent D. Chang, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney By: Karl H. Berger, Assistant City Attorney Exhibit A Title 8 Animals Chapter 8.01 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS 8.01.010. Purpose. This Title 8 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code is adopted pursuant to the City's police powers, and applicable provisions of the California Code, for the purpose of protecting public health and safety; the health and safety of animals kept within the City's jurisdiction; and ensuring that the requirements of this Title 8 are enforced. 8.01.020. Definitions. Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions, in addition to those set forth in chapter 8.14 of this title, govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this title: A. "At large" means whenever a dog is elsewhere than on the premises of the owner or other person having the custody or control of such dog and is not restrained by a leash less than ten (10') feet in length, under the control of a person capable of controlling such dog. B. "Dog" means both male and female dogs over four months old . C. "Dog kennel" means any place where three or more canine animals are kept or permitted to remain. D. "Own" includes the terms keep, maintain, control, harbor, or possess. E. "Owner" means any natural or artificial person who owns an animal for more than fifteen (15) days. F. "Police Chief" means the police chief, or designee. G. "Potentially Dangerous Dog" means any of the following: i. Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions within the prior thirty six (36) month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. ii. Any dog which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in Food and Agricultural Code § 31604. iii. Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions within the prior thirty six (36) month period, has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. H. "Vicious or dangerous animal" means any animal which has bitten a person or other animal without provocation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bishop Barron Blazon Texts
    THE FORMAL BLAZON OF THE EPISCOPAL COAT OF ARMS OF ROBERT E. BARRON, S.T.D. D.D. K.H.S. TITULAR BISHOP OF MACRIANA IN MAURETANIA AUXILIARY TO THE METROPOLITAN OF LOS ANGELES PER PALE OR AND MURREY AN OPEN BOOK PROPER SURMOUNTED OF A CHI RHO OR AND ENFLAMED COUNTERCHANGED, ON A CHIEF WAVY AZURE A PAIR OF WINGS ELEVATED, DISPLAYED AND CONJOINED IN BASE OR CHARGED WITH A FLEUR-DE-LIS ARGENT AND FOR A MOTTO « NON NISI TE DOMINE » THE OFFICE OF AUXILIARY BISHOP The Office of Auxiliary, or Assistant, Bishop came into the Church around the sixth century. Before that time, only one bishop served within an ecclesial province as sole spiritual leader of that region. Those clerics who hold this dignity are properly entitled “Titular Bishops” whom the Holy See has simultaneously assigned to assist a local Ordinary in the exercise of his episcopal responsibilities. The term ‘Auxiliary’ refers to the supporting role that the titular bishop provides a residential bishop but in every way, auxiliaries embody the fullness of the episcopal dignity. Although the Church considers both Linus and Cletus to be the first auxiliary bishops, as Assistants to St. Peter in the See of Rome, the first mention of the actual term “auxiliary bishop” was made in a decree by Pope Leo X (1513‐1521) entitled de Cardinalibus Lateranses (sess. IX). In this decree, Leo confirms the need for clerics who enjoy the fullness of Holy Orders to assist the Cardinal‐Bishops of the Suburbicarian Sees of Ostia, Velletri‐Segni, Sabina‐Poggia‐ Mirteto, Albano, Palestrina, Porto‐Santo Rufina, and Frascati, all of which surround the Roman Diocese.
    [Show full text]
  • Hark the Heraldry Angels Sing
    The UK Linguistics Olympiad 2018 Round 2 Problem 1 Hark the Heraldry Angels Sing Heraldry is the study of rank and heraldic arms, and there is a part which looks particularly at the way that coats-of-arms and shields are put together. The language for describing arms is known as blazon and derives many of its terms from French. The aim of blazon is to describe heraldic arms unambiguously and as concisely as possible. On the next page are some blazon descriptions that correspond to the shields (escutcheons) A-L. However, the descriptions and the shields are not in the same order. 1. Quarterly 1 & 4 checky vert and argent 2 & 3 argent three gouttes gules two one 2. Azure a bend sinister argent in dexter chief four roundels sable 3. Per pale azure and gules on a chevron sable four roses argent a chief or 4. Per fess checky or and sable and azure overall a roundel counterchanged a bordure gules 5. Per chevron azure and vert overall a lozenge counterchanged in sinister chief a rose or 6. Quarterly azure and gules overall an escutcheon checky sable and argent 7. Vert on a fess sable three lozenges argent 8. Gules three annulets or one two impaling sable on a fess indented azure a rose argent 9. Argent a bend embattled between two lozenges sable 10. Per bend or and argent in sinister chief a cross crosslet sable 11. Gules a cross argent between four cross crosslets or on a chief sable three roses argent 12. Or three chevrons gules impaling or a cross gules on a bordure sable gouttes or On your answer sheet: (a) Match up the escutcheons A-L with their blazon descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • 140130 Selectboard Minutes.Pdf
    1 Shutesbury Board of Selectmen Meeting Minutes January 30, 2014 Members present: Chairwoman Elaine Puleo and members Al Springer and April Stein. Members Absent: None. Remote participation: None. Staff present: Town Administrator Rebecca Torres, Administrative Secretary Leslie Bracebridge. Press present: None. Chairman Puleo opened the meeting at 6:30 P.M. at the Shutesbury Town Hall. Appointments Police Chief Harding: 1. February Staffing. 2. Chief Harding has talked with the Finance Committee and will also speak with Personnel Board members about using funds in his payroll line that he previously used to fund Quinn Bill obligations to fund educational incentives. Three considerations were brought up: One: What is written in the union contract. The union contract is up for review next year. Two: What precedence is set for the future. Three: If Shutesbury hires an officer eligible for Quinn benefits, the officer would receive the Quinn match because the town is still bound by the Quinn Bill even though the state match no longer exists. 3. In the presence of Chief Harding and Dog Officer Nancy Long Town Administrator Rebecca Torres briefed the Select Board on dog hearing procedures. 4. At 7:01 PM Chairman Puleo opened the dog hearing and administered the following oath: Do you solemnly state that the testimony that you give in the case now pending before this Board shall be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?: James McNaughton – “yes”, Gail Huntress –“Yes”, Ronald Meck – “Yes”, Dog Officer Nancy Long “Yes”, and Chief Harding “Yes”. Elaine invited anyone to speak on current complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • Audiocodes AGM Proxy Statement 2021
    Exhibit 99.1 August 10, 2021 Dear Shareholder, You are cordially invited to attend the 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of AudioCodes Ltd. (the “Company” or “AudioCodes”), to be held on September 14, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., local time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the enclosed Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. The Meeting will be held at the offices of the Company located at 1 Hayarden Street, Airport City, Lod 7019900, Israel. The telephone number at that address is +972-3-976-4000. The health and well-being of our employees and shareholders are paramount, and we are closely monitoring developments related to the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19. Although we intend to hold the Meeting in person, we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that governments may impose. We reserve the right to convert to a virtual only meeting format should meeting in person become unsafe as a result of COVID-19. If we convert to a virtual only online meeting, we will announce the decision to do so in advance and provide instructions for shareholder participation in the virtual meeting in a Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Meeting. At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on the matters listed in the enclosed Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. AudioCodes’ Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR all of the proposals listed in the Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGINS of the “Mccrackens”
    THE ORIGINS OF THE “McCrackens” By Philip D. Smith, Jr. PhD, FSTS, GTS, FSA Scot “B’e a’Ghaidhlig an canan na h’Albanaich” – “Gaelic was the language of the Scottish people.” The McCrackens are originally Scottish and speakers of the Scottish Gaelic language, a cousin to Irish Gaelic. While today, Gaelic is only spoken by a few thousands, it was the language of most of the people of the north and west of Scotland until after 1900. The McCracken history comes from a long tradition passed from generation to generation by the “seannachies”, the oral historians, of the Gaelic speaking peoples. According to tradition, the family is named for Nachten, Lord of Moray, a district in the northeast of Scotland. Nachten supposedly lived in the 9th century. In the course of time a number of his descendants moved southwest across Scotland and settled in Argyll. The family multiplied and prospered. The Gaelic word for “son” is “mac” and that for “children” is “clann” The descendants of Nachten were called by their neighbors, the Campbells, MacDougalls, and others the “Children of the Son of Nachten”, in Gaelic “Cloinne MacNachtain”, “Clan MacNachtan”. Spelling was not regularized in either Scotland or America until well after 1800. Two spellings alternate for the guttural /k/-like sound common in many Gaelic words, -ch and –gh. /ch/ is the most common Scottish spelling but the sound may be spelled –gh. The Scottish word for “lake” is “loch” while in Northern England and Ireland the same word is spelled “lough”. “MacLachlan” and “Mac Loughlin” are the same name as are “Docherty” and “Dougherty”.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldic Arms and Badges
    the baronies of Duffus, Petty, Balvenie, Clan Heraldic Arms and Aberdour in the northeast of Murray Clan On 15 May 1990 the Court of Lord Scotland, as well as the lordships of Lyon granted The Murray Clan Society Bothwell and Drumsargard and a our armorial ensign or heraldic arms. An Society number of other baronies in lower armorial ensign is the design carried on Clydesdale. Sir Archibald, per the a flag or shield. English property law of jure uxoris, Latin for "by right of (his) wife" became the The Society arms are described on th th Clan Badges legal possessor of her lands. the 14 page of the 75 Volume of Our Public Register of All Arms and Bearings and Heraldic Which Crest Badge to Wear in Scotland, VIDELICT as: Azure, five Although Murrays were permitted to annulets conjoined in fess Argent wear either the mermaid or demi-man between three mullets of the Last. Above Arms crest badges, sometime in the late the Shield is placed an Helm suitable to Clan Badges 1960’s or early 1970’s, the Lord Lyon an incorporation (VIDELICET: a Sallet Prior to the advent of heraldry, King of Arms declared the demi-man Proper lined Scottish clansmen and clanswomen crest badge inappropriate. Since his Gules) with a wore badges to identify themselves. decisions on heraldic matters have the Clan badges were devices with family or force of law in Scotland, all the personal associations which identified manufacturers of clan badges, etc., the possessor, not unlike our modern ceased producing the demi-man. There class rings, military insignias, union pins, was a considerable amount of feeling on etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Brennan Blazon Texts
    THE FORMAL BLAZON OF THE EPISCOPAL COAT OF ARMS OF JOSEPH V. BRENNAN, D.D. TITULAR BISHOP OF TROFIMIANA AUXILIARY TO THE METROPOLITAN OF LOS ANGELES PER CHEVRON EMBOWED ARGENT AND BARRY OF EIGHT AZURE AND ARGENT IN CHIEF TWO ROSES GULES BARBED AND SEEDED OR AND IN BASE A SCALLOP SHELL ALSO OR. ON A CHIEF AZURE A FLEUR-DE-LIS OR BETWEEN TWO WINGS DISPLAYED ARGENT AND FOR A MOTTO « CARITAS CHRISTI URGET NOS » THE OFFICE OF AUXILIARY BISHOP The Office of Auxiliary, or Assistant, Bishop came into the Church around the sixth century. Before that time, only one bishop served within an ecclesial province as sole spiritual leader of that region. Those clerics who hold this dignity are properly entitled “Titular Bishops” whom the Holy See has simultaneously assigned to assist a local Ordinary in the exercise of his episcopal responsibilities. The term ‘Auxiliary’ refers to the supporting role that the titular bishop provides a residential bishop but in every way, auxiliaries embody the fullness of the episcopal dignity. Although the Church considers both Linus and Cletus to be the first auxiliary bishops, as Assistants to St. Peter in the See of Rome, the first mention of the actual term “auxiliary bishop” was made in a decree by Pope Leo X (1513‐1521) entitled de Cardinalibus Lateranses (sess. IX). In this decree, Leo confirms the need for clerics who enjoy the fullness of Holy Orders to assist the Cardinal‐Bishops of the Suburbicarian Sees of Ostia, Velletri‐Segni, Sabina‐Poggia‐ Mirteto, Albano, Palestrina, Porto‐Santo Rufina, and Frascati, all of which surround the Roman Diocese.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry in Ireland
    Heraldry in Ireland Celebrating 75 years of the Office of the Chief Herald at the NLI Sir John Ainsworth Shield Vert, a chevron between three battle-axes argent Crest A falcon rising proper, beaked, legged and belled gules Motto Surgo et resurgam Did you know? Sir John Ainsworth was the NLI's Surveyor of Records in Private Keeping in the 1940s and 1950s. Roderick More OFerrall Shield Quarterly: 1st, Vert, a lion rampant or (for O Ferrall); 2nd, Vert a lion rampant in chief three estoiles or (for O More); 3rd, Argent, upon a mount vert two lions rampant combatant gules supporting the trunk of an oak tree entwined with a serpent descending proper, (for O Reilly); 4th, Azure, a bend cotised or between six escallops argent (for Cruise) Crest On a ducal coronet or a greyhound springing sable; A dexter hand lying fess-ways proper cuffed or holding a sword in pale hilted of the second pierced through three gory heads of the first Motto Cú re bu; Spes mea Deus Did you know? This four designs on the shield represent four families. Heiress Leticia More of Balyna, county Kildare married Richard Ferrall in 1751. Their grandson Charles Edward More O'Ferrall married Susan O'Reilly in 1849. Susan was the daughter of Dominic O'Reilly of Kildangan Castle, county Kildare who had married heiress Susanna Cruise in 1818. Dublin Stock Exchange Shield Quarterly: 1st, Sable, a tower or; 2nd, Vert, three swords points upwards two and one proper pommelled and hilted or; 3rd, Vert, three anchors erect two and one argent; 4th, Chequy, sable and argent, on a chief argent an escroll proper, inscribed thereon the words Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • Knllhtsj^ARMOR
    School Picture Sei Number 10 KNllHTSj^ARMOR THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART KNIGHTS IN ARMOR The knight was a warrior on horseback. He and his men had to fight for their liege lord when­ ever their services were demanded. In return the knight received a grant of land or special privi­ leges to provide for the cost of his armor, the care of his horse, and the upkeep of his household and retinue. He was considered a member of the nobility and obeyed the code of ethics which we call chivalry. Thus a knight should be loyal, courageous, and courteous as well as skilled in all the arts of war. His obligations to his lord and his own sense of honor brought him into many conflicts. He fought in major wars and countless minor ones. As a Crusader he "took the cross" and journeyed to the Holy Land to fight the infidels. As a champion of the wronged or to settle a point of honor, he challenged another knight in single combat. In quest of adventure he wandered about strange lands as a knight errant. When times were peace­ ful, he kept in training by fighting in jousts and tournaments. In these enclosed pictures you will see the vari­ ous activities of the knight, as well as some of his weapons and the armor that provided the pro­ tection he needed. THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART 1. NORMAN CONQUEST Detail, Bayeux embroidery French, Late 11th Century Bayeux THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART In the time of William the Conqueror, knights seem to have worn armor of rings sewed on heavily padded garments, conical helmets, and carried javelins, swords, and kite-shaped shields.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry for Beginners
    The Heraldry Society Educational Charity No: 241456 HERALDRY Beasts, Banners & Badges FOR BEGINNERS Heraldry is a noble science and a fascinating hobby – but essentially it is FUN! J. P. Brooke-Little, Richmond Herald, 1970 www.theheraldrysociety.com The Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society are indebted to all those who have made this publication possible October 2016 About Us he Heraldry Society was founded in 1947 by John P. Brooke-Little, CVO, KStJ, FSA, FSH, the Tthen Bluemantle Pursuivant of Arms and ultimately, in 1995, Clarenceux King of Arms. In 1956 the Society was incorporated under the Companies Act (1948). By Letters Patent dated 10th August 1957 the Society was granted Armorial Bearings. e Society is both a registered non-prot making company and an educational charity. Our aims The To promote and encourage the study and knowledge of, and to foster and extend interest in, the Heraldry Society science of heraldry, armory, chivalry, precedence, ceremonial, genealogy, family history and all kindred subjects and disciplines. Our activities include Seasonal monthly meetings and lectures Organising a bookstall at all our meetings Publishing a popular newsletter, The Heraldry Gazette, and a more scholarly journal, The Coat of Arms In alternate years, oering a residential Congress with speakers and conducted visits Building and maintaining a heraldry archive Hosting an informative website Supporting regional Societies’ initiatives Our Membership Is inclusive and open to all A prior knowledge of heraldry is not a prerequisite to membership, John Brooke-Little nor is it necessary for members to possess their own arms. e Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society The Society gratefully acknowledges the owners and holders of copyright in the graphics and images included in this publication which may be reproduced solely for educational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • NORDEFCO Annual Report 2015
    NOR DEF CO NORDEFCO Annual Report 2015 “By 2020 we envision an enchanced political and military dialogue on security and defence issues and where we actively seek for possibilities for cooperation. We create efficent and cost-effective solutions based on shared understanding of our mutual potential and challenges. We are committed to enhanced cooperation and coordination in capability development and armaments cooperation. We coordinate activities in international operations and capacity building, human resources, education, training and exercises. We seek to increase the pooling of capabilities and to deepen cooperation in the area of life-cycle support of our defence inventories.” From the Nordic Defence Cooperation Vision 2020, December 2013 2 NORDEFCO Annual Report 2015 NORDEFCO ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Content 04 FOREWORD 07 SWEDISH CHAIRMANSHIP 2015 11 NORDEFCO COOPERATION AREAS 12 COOPERATION AREA ARMAMENTS (COPA ARMA) 14 COOPERATION AREA CAPABILITIES (COPA CAPA) 16 COOPERATION AREA HUMAN RESOURCES AND EDUCATION (COPA HRE) 18 COOPERATION AREA OPERATIONS (COPA OPS) 20 COOPERATION AREA TRAINING AND EXERCISES (COPA TEX) 22 COOPERATION WITH THIRD PARTIES 24 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF NORDIC DEFENCE COOPERATION 1952–2014 30 THE NORDEFCO STRUCTURE 32 MINISTERS JOINT ARTICLE 2015 34 DANISH CHAIRMANSHIP 2016 Production: Ministry of Defence Sweden • January 2016 Photo: Swedish Armed Forces • Ministry of Defence Sweden • Norwegian Armed Forces Print: Elanders Sverige AB NORDEFCO Annual Report 2015 3 FOREWORD The Nordic countries meet the challenging security situation in our region through solidarity and enhanced cooperation. Our cooperation is built on shared values and we address challenges together. With differing organizational affiliations we cooperate closely within the framework of the EU and NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignation in Lieu of Discipline
    ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 14-9249 IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY P. GRIFFIN The Court has reviewed the Motion for Acceptance of Resignation as Attorney and Counselor at Law in Lieu of Disciplinary Action of Anthony P. Griffin (the Motion) and the Response of the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the Commission for Lawyer Discipline (the Response). The Court concludes each meets the requirements of Part X of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. The Court notes that Anthony P. Griffin has waived his right to withdraw the Motion. Therefore, the Court deems the professional misconduct detailed in the Response conclusively established for all purposes. The Court further concludes that acceptance of the resignation of Anthony P. Griffin is in the best interest of the public and the profession. Therefore, the law license of Anthony P. Griffin of Galveston, Texas, State Bar Card Number 08455300 is canceled. Anthony P. Griffin must immediately surrender his State Bar Card and Texas law license to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas or file with the Court an affidavit stating why he cannot. Consequently, Anthony P. Griffin is prohibited from practicing law in the State of Texas. He is prohibited from holding himself out as an attorney at law, performing legal services for others, giving legal advice to others, accepting any fee directly or indirectly for legal services, appearing as counsel or in any representative capacity in any proceeding in any Texas court or before any Texas administrative body (whether state, county, municipal, or other), or holding himself out to others or using his name in any manner in conjunction with the words “Attorney at Law,” “Counselor at Law,” or “Lawyer.” Additionally, Anthony P.
    [Show full text]