TOKYOSep./Oct. 2002 NUKECitizens' Nuclear INFO Information Center No. 91 3F Kotobuki Bldg., 1-58-15, Higashi-nakano, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-0003, JAPAN URL: http://www.cnic.or.jp/ e-mail : [email protected] JCO Criticality A c c i d e n t T h r e e Ye a r s o n : Q u e s t i o n s S t i l l U n a n s w e r e d
A survey assistant explains about a survey form of the effects of JCO criticality accident to the residents near JCO Co. on February 2002 (Naka-town, Ibaraki Prefecture. Photo by Noboru Kobayashi) Three years have passed since the JCO the Japan Congress Against the A- and H- criticality accident occurred on 30 September Bombs together organized the “JCO Criticality 1999. This article reviews results of the second Accident Comprehensive Assessment Com- field survey of Tokai-mura (Tokai Village) and mittee” in 1999 and issued a report in Septem- Naka-machi (Naka Town) residents, carried out by the JCO Criticality Accident Comprehensive CONTENTS Assessment Committee in February 2002, and JCO Criticality Accident Three Years on: summarizes the current status of trials concern- Questions Still Unanswered 1-3 The 14th International Summer Symposium on ing the JCO criticality accident that have not Science and the World Affairs 4-5 been covered since Nuke Info Tokyo 86. Data: - Japanese Pu stockpile 6 - Workers’ exposure 7 The JCO accident left deep scar TEPCO postponed Plu-thermal plan 8-9 Anti-Nuke Who’s who: Toshiko Baba 10 Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center and News Watch 11-12 Sep/Oct 2002 No.91 Nuke Info Tokyo ber 2000 (See NIT 80). The Committee has been resolved, and 64 percent of them still had been supported by the TOYOTA foundation in concerns for the effect that the radiation may assessing the JCO accident since November still have on them. 2001. In February 2002, more than two years 76 percent of them indicated a negative atti- after the September ‘99 accident, the JCO tude toward the installation of additional nucle- Committee members carried out a second field ar facilities in Tokai Village. 46 percent of survey of Tokai Village and Naka Town resi- them opposed the hosting of the ITER (Inter- dents. national Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) The survey was carried out as a part of a in Naka Town, while 24 percent favors hosting series of research surveys begun in Febru- the ITER project. In addition, more than half ary 2000, and which have been led by Koichi of the participants replied negatively to the Hasegawa, a professor of environmental soci- question suggesting that they would rather not ology at the Graduate School of Arts and Let- talk about topics relating the JCO accident and ters, Tohoku University, and Yuko Takubo, an nuclear power. Although the JCO criticality assistant professor of sociology at the College accident left local residents with deep scars on of Environmental and Disaster Research, Fuji the one hand, the opinion survey enlightens on Tokoha University. The aim of the surveys is how the accident has affected them and in what to examine current health condition of the resi- way the community of this area has changed; dents, the effects of the accident on their daily i.e. it can be seen that they have begun an open activities, and their opinions regarding nuclear discussion regarding nuclear power among power. themselves. As a result of this survey, 1,008 question- naires were completed from 535 households. The ruling on the JCO trial will be The recovery rate of 77 percent from the sam- delivered next spring ple households indicates keen interests among local residents about this issue. Prof. Hasega- On April 23, 2001, the first JCO public trial wa reported on the results and analysis of the was held at Mito district court, where the pub- survey in Tokai Village in April and in Tokyo lic prosecutor described how the JCO relent- in May. lessly continued its operation, resulting in the The results of the survey show that those death of two of their staff. Since then several who have been suffering from mental and hearings have been held to question witnesses. physical complaints have Table 1. Correlation between distance from the JCO site and the awareness of increased as compared to physical abnormalities 2 years ago, whose results were more than antici- not changed not feeling well in bad health Total within 350m 27 12 4 43 pated, and it was found to 62.8% 27.9% 9.3% 100% be statistically significant 350-500m 138 12 2 152 that those living closer to 90.8% 7.9% 1.3% 100% 500-1000m 187 24 3 214 the accident site tended 87.4% 11.2% 1.4% 100% to claim higher rates of 1000-1500m 253 20 4 277 abnormalities (Table 1 91.3% 7.2% 1.4% 100% and 2). 25 percent of the 1500-2000m 282 16 5 303 93.1% 5.3% 1.7% 100% participants who have Total 887 84 18 989 received medical diagnosis 89.7% 8.5% 1.8% 100% check-ups by Ibaraki Pre- upper: number of responses fecture reported that their lower: % χ2=43.217, d.f.=8, p<0.0012 anxiety and fear have not Nuke Info Tokyo Sep/Oct 2002 No.91
Mr. Yokokawa, one of the workers Table 2. Correlation between distance from the JCO site and the num- at the scene, testified in February ber of cases who have physical abnormalities and the testimony of five defen- 0 1 to to 9 10 Total dants’ were followed. The hear- within 350m 29 2 7 5 1 44 ings were completed in June. It 65.9% 4.5% 15.9% 11.4% 2.3% 100% is expected that the prosecutor’ 350-500m 115 12 19 4 3 153 75.2% 7.8% 12.4% 2.6% 2.0% 100% s as well as the defendants’ final 500-1000m 169 25 15 5 4 218 speech and recommendation for 77.5% 11.5% 6.9% 2.3% 1.8% 100% punishment for the accused will 1000-1500m 221 21 34 7 0 283 be made at Mito district court 78.1% 7.4% 12.0% 2.5% 0.0% 100% 1500-2000m 254 26 22 6 2 310 on September 2 and October 21 81.9% 8.4% 7.1% 1.9% 0.6% 100% respectively. A ruling in this case Total 788 86 97 27 10 1,008 is expected to be handed down at 78.2% 8.5% 9.6% 2.7% 1.0% 100% upper: number of cases the end of this fiscal year (next lower: % 2=33.728, d.f.=16, spring). χ The trial of the JCO case was taken place after each defendant tion of Nuclear Accident and Failures in the confirmed and agreed to the basic facts of the NSC and during the criminal trial. indictment. Defendants claimed that various It was extremely regrettable that human factors, along with an error made by the JCO, relationships between the PNC and the NSC, were involved in the cause of the accident. It is and a detailed account of how and why a “pre- known that the JCO conversion building where cipitation tank” was used in the JCO factory, the incident took place passed a safety inspec- have never been uncovered. tion in 1984, fifteen years before the accident. With regard to the economic damage caused However, the inspection was very superfi- by the accident, a fermented soybean produc- cial, and this is thought to be one element in tion company has filed a suit, seeking 18 bil- the cause of the accident. It was revealed for lion yen compensation against JCO. A fish the first time in the course of the trial that the retailing company and a marine products com- appointed safety inspector from the Science pany have brought cases to seek reparations of and Technology Agency (STA) had been con- 56 million yen and 80 million yen respectively. tracted out from Japan Nuclear Cycle Devel- In September 3 of 2002, three local residents opment Institute (JNC), formerly the Power appealed to a court for compensation for dam- Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Cor- age to their health. All the trials are currently poration (PNC), which had submitted an order ongoing. for uranium processing from JCO. It was also The JCO Criticality Accident Comprehen- stated during the trial that the PNC repeatedly sive Assessment Committee is planning to demanded that the JCO should carry out rush issue an interim report (in Japanese) in Sep- jobs for them. tember 2002. (The final report is expected to Since the PNC and the STA have not been be issued in the autumn of 2003). The interim charged with any crime for this trial, their report will include the committee members’ responsibilities have not been fully unveiled. reports on the status of the trials mentioned In particular, there has never been any official above, the results of the field survey of local investigation of the members of the Commit- residents, and problems associated with disas- tee on Examination of Nuclear Fuel Safety in ter prevention measures. By Satoshi Fujino the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC), which approved JCO’s safety inspection, during the session of the Special Committee on Investiga- Sep/Oct. 2002 No.91 Nuke Info Tokyo
Attending the 14th International Summer Symposium on Science and the World Affairs
I had an opportunity to attend an interna- However, their specialties were not limited to tional symposium entitled the “14th Interna- only nuclear engineering but to other special- tional Summer Symposium on Science and the izations such as laser physics and space engi- World Affairs,” which was held at the Univer- neering. sity of Illinois in the United States from July 15 Because it was the first symposium to be to 21, 2002. held after the last year’s September 11th terror- The symposium was hosted by the Union ist attacks in the U.S., many presentations con- of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a U.S.-based cerning nuclear terrorism attracted the audienc- non-governmental organization established by es’ attention. For example, a Chinese research- American scientists. Since the U.S. was the er calculated the damages that would occur if host country this time, the study program on terrorists launched a small-scale atomic bomb Arms Control, Disarmament, and International from a ship or a truck. Other researchers, con- Security at the University of Illinois cooperated sidering the kinds of nuclear weapons terrorists in the organization of the symposium. might use, indicated that reactor-grade pluto- For the past 30 years, according to the UCS, nium could be used for such purposes. technically informed specialists have began Other than terrorist related nuclear issues, a to play an important role in the policy arena Russian presenter talked about the capacities with regard to the issues of international safety for storing spent fuels at a plant named RT-2, assurance and arms control. While such spe- whose construction is currently suspended, and cialists watch the government and industry’s the way an operational procedure for secur- activities in such areas, they can also provide ing safety of the plant might be established. In basic scientific information to help policymak- addition, the following risk calculations were ers arrive at their decisions. performed for each case: an earthquake and The aim of this symposium was to support strong wind as exterior hazards; a fire as an young scientists whose research interest is interior hazard; the treatment of a cask; loss of related to international security and arms con- cooling water; and the loss of electrical power. trol. In particular, the organizer urged many A researcher from Germany reported that scientists to attend whose home country’s reactor-grade plutonium could be used to create natural science field has not paid special inter- a nuclear explosion by breeding tritium from a est to the issues discussed. Another important fusion power plant where the pre-ignition prob- purpose of this symposium was to create a lem will be lessened. network linking researchers working in similar I presented on the possibilities of nuclear situations. The symposium started in 1989 and fusion technologies being applied to the devel- has been staged in Russia, the U.S., China, and opment of nuclear weapons in Japan. Nuclear Germany, with researchers participating from fusion R&D is said to be conducted only for more than 18 countries, including Japan. peaceful purposes. I demonstrated from the This year, about 40 participants attended engineering point of view, however, that it from 9 countries, most of whom were engi- could be possible for research to be used for neers and physicists working in universities. military applications. By drawing attention Nuke Info Tokyo Sep/Oct 2002 No.91 to the Magnetic Confinement Fusion device Committee. JT-60 at Japan Atomic Energy Research Insti- Marvin Miller of the Massachusetts Institute tute (JAERI) and the inertial Confinement of Technology, made an interesting presenta- Fusiondevice Gekko-XII at Osaka University, tion entitled, “Japan and Nuclear Weapons, and I argued that we already had both nuclear tech- Reactor-grade Plutonium.” He emphasized nologies, such as neutron sources and tritium the fact that Japan took seven years to ratify production technologies, had potential military the Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), which applications, and there are possibilities to trans- appeared to confirm Japan’s affirmative stance fer the development of certain other technolo- towards the utilization of nuclear weapons. He gies, i.e. laser and beams, in order to utilize concluded that therefore Japan could be regard- them for space weapon military purposes. In ed as essentially nuclear weapons state in light the discussion time, many questions were of the current advanced ability of Japan’s sci- raised regarding Japan’s three non-nuclear prin- ence and technology. ciples. It seemed that Japan’s plutonium stock- Regarding the impression of this symposium pile and highly advanced technology posed it seems to me that it was not wholly satisfac- serious threats to many foreign observers. tory since there was little discussion about the Apart from nuclear issues, there were many importance of citizens’ participation in this presentations related to space weapons and field. Perhaps this was unavoidable because technical criticisms of the Bush administration’ most participants came from universities and s missile defense strategy. research institutions; very few participants During the symposium, I used the univer- from non-governmental organizations at the sity’s housing and dining rooms, which pro- symposium. There were sometimes situations vided me with the experience of an American reflecting complicated national outlooks in college student. During a break, many par- which the use of nuclear weapons was justified ticipants visited an Amish village, which was as a necessary condition to protect the home located around an hour’s drive from the univer- country. However, all the experiences that I sity. The Amish have chosen not to participate gained during the symposium were very valu- fully in modern civilization - consuming a very able, prompting me to think about how I should small amount of energy - without any compul- work in this field in the future. sion in their living. In particular, their beautiful By Tadahiro Katsuta houses and attractive dress appealed to many participants. We enjoyed a simple but tasty meal there. Picture: Memorial photograph of symposium participants Following the symposium, on the 22nd and 23rd of July, the “1st Interna- tional Professional Meeting of Indepen- dent Technical Security Analysts” was held in Chicago. I had a chance there to meet Dr. Frank Von Hippel, who served as an assistant director of national secu- rity at the White House, and is a profes- sor at Princeton University, and Rich- ard L. Garwin, who has experience in developing nuclear weapons and served on the President’s Scientific Advisory Sep./Oct. 2002 No.91 Nuke Info Tokyo
Data: Japan’s Separated Plutonium Inventory
Amount of Plutonium as of the end of the year (kg, total plutonium) FACILITY 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Reprocessing plant of which 326 836 753 602 538 537 528 582 842 as nitorate 288 710 597 384 385 384 375 365 539 stored as oxide 38 126 156 217 153 154 154 217 303 MOX fuel fabrication plant of which 3269 3018 3146 3543 3649 3596 3491 3413 3294 stored as oxide 2339 2032 1980 2346 2553 2737 2652 2515 2323 under processing 790 948 985 786 726 473 481 439 551 completed fuel 140 38 181 411 370 386 358 360 420 Reactor sites of which 1089 498 823 887 819 832 1298 1290 1546 Joyo 15 6 31 48 23 2 38 18 64 Monju 637 15 367 367 367 367 367 367 367 Fugen 12 53 0 43 0 34 0 0 0 LWR 465 465 670 Critical assemblies 425 425 425 429 429 429 428 440 444 Overseas reprocessors of which 6197 8720 11378 15090 19083 24398 27596 32070 32379 BNFL 1286 1412 1418 2437 3549 6109 6957 10118 10713 COGEMA 4911 7308 9960 12653 15534 18290 20639 21953 21666 TOTAL 10881 13072 16100 20122 24089 29363 32913 37355 38061 Compiled by CNIC Data source: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Figure: Japanese Pu surplus
40000
35000
30000 Total - 1 - 25000 Oversea
20000
15000
10000
Domestic 5000
0 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 year
86 kgHM of plutonium was recovered at the Tokai reprocessing plant in 2001. Electric companies say that they will finish reprocessing the entire amounts - which were contracted out - by 2002 or early 2003. The pri- mary factor of increasing plutonium could attribute to its recovery in Japan and Britain. The plutonium stored at France was decreased since some of the fuels were shipped to Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (NPP) fabricated as MOX (Mixed Oxide plutonium) fuel (205 kgHM in the table above) in Belgium or others were on the manufacture line for fabricating new MOX fuel at MELOX in France. By Hideyuki Ban Nuke Info Tokyo Sep./Oct. 2002 No.91 Data: Workers’ Exposure at Nuclear Plants
Workers’ Radiation Exposure at Nuclear Plants, 1980-2001 Annual Collective Dose of Nuclear Plant Workers (person-Sv) Fiscal Year Utility Employees Contract Workers Total 1980 7.96 119.52 127.47 1981 7.84 119.33 127.18 1982 7.33 117.67 125.00 1983 6.60 112.06 118.67 1984 5.97 111.25 117.23 1985 5.36 107.25 112.59 1986 4.31 97.68 101.98 1987 3.88 90.93 94.82 1988 3.76 89.00 92.76 1989 3.12 84.28 87.39 1990 2.96 79.01 81.94 1991 2.69 55.16 57.86 1992 2.66 60.89 63.54 1993 2.78 83.86 86.65 1994 2.45 62.48 64.89 1995 2.85 63.50 66.32 1996 2.92 66.10 68.99 1997 2.98 77.77 80.77 1998 3.07 68.78 71.85 1999 3.06 80.69 83.78 2000 3.13 75.72 78.83 2001 3.35 74.69 78.05 *Fugen Prototype Advanced Thermal Reactor excluded
[person-Sv] Source: Agency of Nuclear and Industrial Safety
140
120
100