The Relation Between Christianity and Paganism in the Reign of Saint Emperor Constantine the Great

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Relation Between Christianity and Paganism in the Reign of Saint Emperor Constantine the Great CUPRINS FOREWORD ............................................................................................... 7 † Dr. IRINEU TEACHING ABOUT THE HOLY CROSS FROM THE HOLY PRIESTS .............. 15 † Dr. Nicodim NICOLĂESCU MAN BETWEEN FREEDOM AND LOVE AS THE GIFTS OF GOD ................ 35 † Dr. Emilian LOVIŞTEANUL THE PERSONALITY OF THE HOLY EMPERORS CONSTANTINE AND HELENA MIRRORED IN THE WORK OF OF FOUR ROMANIAN HIERARCH SAINTS . 54 Acad. Dr. Mircea PĂCURARIU THE TRAIL OF THE EDICT OF MILAN IN MODERN BULGARIA .................. 73 Dr. Klara TONEVA POST-CONSTANTINE PREACHING: THE THREE HOLY HIERARHS ............. 85 Dr. Andrian ALEKSANDROV THE PATH TO CHRISTIANITY OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT’S FAMILY ACCORDING TO ANCIENT SOURCES AND MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHY. ............................................................................................................... 105 Dr. Constantin PĂTULEANU THE KINGDOM OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT - THE BEGINNING OF THE GEOPOLITICAL PREDOMINANCE OF THE ORIENTAL ROMANITY IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE .................................................................................... 137 Dr. Dinică CIOBOTEA CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AND HIS CHRISTIAN CONSCIENCE .............. 145 Dr. Dimitris APOSTOLIDIS CONSTANTINE THE GREAT, THE APOLOGIST OF CHRISTIANITY ............ 174 Dr. Gabriel-Viorel GÂRDAN FROM TRAJAN AND DECEBALUS, TO CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. THE ROMANIANS, BETWEEN THE DACIAN HERITAGE AND LATIN IDENTITY. ............................................................................................................... 184 Dr. Sergiu POPESCU 5 SAINT EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AND THE CHRISTIANITY BETWEEN THE CARPATHIANS AND THE DANUBE ................................. 199 Dr. Radu TASCOVICI CHURCH AND STATE IN THE SYNERGY OF THE PAIDEIC ACT ................ 210 Dr. Adrian IVAN CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AND THE UNITY OF FAITH .......................... 231 Dr. Gabriel BASA THE RELATION BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND PAGANISM IN THE REIGN OF SAINT EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ................................... 241 Dr. Adrian BOLDIŞOR DAS PARTHENON DER HL. THEKLA IN SELEUKIA (ISAURIEN) IN DER (POST)KONSTANTINISCHEN ZEIT UND SEINE ROLLE IN DER GESCHICHTE DER MÖNCHISCHEN SPIRITUALITÄT ...................................................... 260 Dr. Picu OCOLEANU UNITY CHRISTIAN FAITH, A FACTOR OF STABILITY AND PROGRESS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE IN THE REIGN OF SAINT EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT .................................................................................................... 273 Dr. Nicuşor Viorel POPESCU THE IMPORTANCE OF HONORING THE SAINTS APOSTLES BY EMPEROR CONSTANTINE AND HIS MOTHER, HELEN ............................................. 285 Dr. Ion Sorin BORA BRIEF OUTLINE ON THE SYRIAN THEOLOGY BETWEEN NICAEA AND CHALCEDON ........................................................................................... 304 Dr. Ioniţă APOSTOLACHE THE RELATIONS OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WITH THE NORTH AND SOUTH DANUBIAN LANDS ..................................................................... 324 Dr. Ciprian CATANĂ CANONICAL NORMS AND PRESCRIPTIONS ISSUED UNDER CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ............................................................................................. 343 Dr. Pavel GOREANU 6 THE RELATION BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND PAGANISM IN THE REIGN OF SAINT EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT Dr. Adrian BOLDIŞOR University of Craiova, Faculty of Theology Introduction The relation between Christianity and paganism represented, especially in the early Christian centuries, the main concern of both the Fathers and Writers of the Church and the pagan Greco-Latin authors. The way that the new religion was understood and interpreted was for a long time, one of the major concerns in the Roman Empire, regardless of the social position of those involved in the dispute. This situation lasted until the time of the emperor Constantine the Great (272-337), and even after his reign (306-337), its analysis being of great interest in knowing how Christianity defeated Greco-Roman paganism and spread throughout the empire and even beyond its borders. St. Constantine the Great remained a controversial figure in the history of the Church of all confessions. „He is one of those people who seem by their personality, their acumen, and their ability both to take the opportunities offered and to leave the world markedly changed by their presence in it. He bequeaths a series of paradoxes: an autocrat who never ruled alone; a firm legislator for the Roman family, yet who slew his wife and eldest son and was himself, illegitimate; a dynastic puppet-master, who left no clear successor; a soldier whose legacy was far more spiritual 241 than temporal”1. Constantine the Great is considered „holy” in the Orthodox Church, in the Roman Catholic Church „great”, while the Protestant world and a large number of modern scholars consider him a political opportunist who was driven by personal and state interests to achieve his goals. „Many scholars ascribe sincere religious motives to him, while others see him as an opportunist currying favor with a vocal minority. We do know that Constantine's contemporaries and successors viewed his patronage of Christianity as a watershed: for pagans, such as Zosimus, it was the beginning of the end of a proud empire; for Christians, such as Eusebius, it was the dawning of a bright new day of Christian triumph. Constantine put a great deal of financial and political support behind Christianity, beyond the simple legalization of the movement in 313 C.E.”2. According to some researchers, the king helped the Christian Church in order to use it: he kept the title of pontifex maximus, he tolerated paganism, he was baptized only on his deathbed by the Arian bishop Eusebius of Nicomedia, he oscillated between Christianity and paganism and between Orthodoxy and Arianism. His policy was unfavorable to Christianity frequently. To understand the transition of St. Constantine the Great from paganism to Christianity it is necessary to see both his whole life and the religious, social, economic, political and military realities in the time when he lived and reigned as king. Only trying to be inclusive of all realities in the 4th century and the society that was preparing for the greatest transformation in history one can understand the decisions taken 1 Bill Leadbetter, Constantine, in: The Early Christian World, Volume I-II, Edited by Philip F. Esler, Routledge, London and New York, 2002, p. 1069. For a pertinent analysis of the opinions regarding the controversial personality of Saint Constantine the Great read: Prof. N. Bănescu, Din istoria Imperiului bizantin. Perioada protobizantină, in the magazine „Mitropolia Olteniei”, Year XXI, Nr. 5-6/1969, p. 355-386. 2 Bart D. Ehrman, Andrew S. Jacobs, Christianity in Late Antiquity – 300-450 C.E. A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 2004, p. 24. 242 by the Roman emperor and some „slippage” from the ideal that he followed in life. The imperial religious policy promoted by St. Constantine should not be interpreted separately from his personal evolution from paganism to Christianity, becoming in time a rule of life for him. „The question of the conversion of Constantine has continued to excite controversy. Its authenticity has been questioned and asserted with equal ferocity. The degree of vigour with which the partisans of either side (…) have approached this question is enduring testimony to the historical significance of the religious policies embarked upon by Constantine. Despite attempts to demonstrate otherwise, the nature of Constantine’s personal religious beliefs will always be a mystery precisely because they remained private. What does matter, however, is the way in which Constantine came to frame a religious policy which did more than merely tolerate Christianity”3. Politics and religion in the Roman Empire in the 3rd and 4th centuries In the 3rd century AD the Roman Empire was going through a deep crisis that is observed both in a rapid succession of the Roman emperors to the throne, and in the barbarian invasions that tended to approach Rome. „Also, religiously and morally, Latin paganism no longer met the requirements of the age. People aspired to a religion entirely detached from this disappointed world, a religion that would transfer into another world the goal and finality of the earthly existence”4. In 284, Diocletian was proclaimed emperor in the East, and starting from 285, after the death of Carinus, became sole emperor of the 3 Bill Leadbetter, cited work, p. 1074. 4 Ion Bica, Istoria Bizanţului (324-1453), University of Pitesti Printing Press, 2002, p. 11. 243 Roman Empire. He chose Nicomedia as residence city and he considered himself, at the same time that he was king, the representative on earth of the supreme god Jupiter, thus having supreme power in all areas of the Roman life. This was a thinking heavily influenced by the East, where the leader was considered the son of the god. By doing so, Diocletian managed to maintain the unity of the Empire and restored order in the chaos that existed for several generations, thus proving a worthy successor of his predecessors, especially of Caesar, Augustus and Hadrian. On the other hand, Diocletian is known in Church history as one of the greatest persecutors, the promoter of what will endure over time as the „great persecution”. The king chose Maximian as associate (augustus), in 286, who administered the western part of the Empire, thus the East remaining subordinated to himself. In
Recommended publications
  • New Light on "The Excursion" ALAN G
    New Light on "The Excursion" ALAN G. HILL fresh approach to The Excursion is long overdue if Wordsworth is to take his rightful place among the sages of the early Victorian period. But the obstacles in the way of this are great. There is little gen• eral agreement as to what, if anything, Wordsworth was trying to achieve in this vast, even sprawling, structure, and it has never attracted the steady critical attention that would have made it more accessible now. Apart from the tragic tale of Margaret in Book I, which in the form of The Ruined Cottage was written much earlier, the poem is largely ignored except as evidence of Wordsworth's poetic decline. Jeffrey's notorious verdict —• "This will never do!" — has re-echoed in one form or another down the years. The poem really deserves a better fate altogether. As one of the great reassertions of traditional values and be• liefs against the sceptical spirit of the Enlightenment, it is a work no student of the nineteenth century can afford to neglect. But a more favourable estimate is impossible while the whole raison d'etre of the design remains prob• lematic. Wordsworth's own remarks about The Excursion (parti• cularly in the Preface of 1814) and its relation to the un• finished Recluse reveal little about his intentions in or• ganizing the poem as he did. A few influences are fairly clear: the dialogues of Plato, and possibly those of George Berkeley as well, the didactic and contemplative poetry of the eighteenth century, and finally travelogues like John Thelwall's miscellany The Peripatetic (1793).
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Firmicus Maternus: De Errore Profanarum Religionum
    RICE UNIVERSITY JULIUS FIRMICUS MATERNUS: DE ERRORE PROFANARUM RELIGIONUM. INTRODUCTION, TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY by Richard E. Oster, Jr. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS Thesis Director's Signature: Houston, Texas May 1971 ABSTRACT JULIUS FIRMICUS MATERNUS: DE ERRORE PROFANARUM RELIGIONUM. INTRODUCTION, TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY BY Richard E. Oster, Jr. B.A. Texas Technological College M.A. Rice University Julius Firmicus Maternus, author of De Errore Profanarum Religiomm. and Mathesis, is an important but oftentimes over¬ looked writer from the middle of the fourth century. He is known to us only from the two works which he left behind, the former being a Christian polemic against pagan religion and the latter, a work he wrote while still a pagan, being on the subject of astrology. It is his Christian work which is the topic of this thesis. The middle of the fourth century when Firmicus wrote his work, A.D. 346-350, was a time of religious change and struggle in the Roman Empire. Within Christianity there were still troubles over the issues which precipitated the Council of Nicea. Outside of the church, paganism, though on the defensive, was still strong. Legislation had been passed against the pagan cults but it was not being enforced. So, about A.D. 348, a Roman Senator, Julius Firmicus Maternus, wrote a letter Concerning the Error of Profane 1 2 Religions to the Emperors Constans and Constantius. The first section of this work, chapters 1-17, presents the various gods of antiquity. Firmicus ridicules these by de¬ picting the crimes and immorality of the gods, by showing that the pagan gods were nothing more than personified elements or processes of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity and Astrology: Fundamental Incompatability Concerning Gods and Free Will
    CHRISTIANITY AND ASTROLOGY: FUNDAMENTAL INCOMPATABILITY CONCERNING GODS AND FREE WILL An Undergraduate Research Scholars Thesis by KATHERINE MILLER Submitted to the Undergraduate Research Scholars program at Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the designation as an UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH SCHOLAR Approved by Research Advisor: Dr. Justin Lake May 2020 Major: Biology Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review.................................................................................................... 1 Thesis Statement ..................................................................................................... 1 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................... 2 Project Description.................................................................................................. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER I. THE PLANETS AS GODLY BEINGS ........................................................................ 6 Babylon ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Practicing Love of God in Medieval Jerusalem, Gaul and Saxony
    he collection of essays presented in “Devotional Cross-Roads: Practicing Love of God in Medieval Gaul, Jerusalem, and Saxony” investigates test case witnesses of TChristian devotion and patronage from Late Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages, set in and between the Eastern and Western Mediterranean, as well as Gaul and the regions north of the Alps. Devotional practice and love of God refer to people – mostly from the lay and religious elite –, ideas, copies of texts, images, and material objects, such as relics and reliquaries. The wide geographic borders and time span are used here to illustrate a broad picture composed around questions of worship, identity, reli- gious affiliation and gender. Among the diversity of cases, the studies presented in this volume exemplify recurring themes, which occupied the Christian believer, such as the veneration of the Cross, translation of architecture, pilgrimage and patronage, emergence of iconography and devotional patterns. These essays are representing the research results of the project “Practicing Love of God: Comparing Women’s and Men’s Practice in Medieval Saxony” guided by the art historian Galit Noga-Banai, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the histori- an Hedwig Röckelein, Georg-August-University Göttingen. This project was running from 2013 to 2018 within the Niedersachsen-Israeli Program and financed by the State of Lower Saxony. Devotional Cross-Roads Practicing Love of God in Medieval Jerusalem, Gaul and Saxony Edited by Hedwig Röckelein, Galit Noga-Banai, and Lotem Pinchover Röckelein/Noga-Banai/Pinchover Devotional Cross-Roads ISBN 978-3-86395-372-0 Universitätsverlag Göttingen Universitätsverlag Göttingen Hedwig Röckelein, Galit Noga-Banai, and Lotem Pinchover (Eds.) Devotional Cross-Roads This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corpus Hermeticum: a Mirror for the Evolution of Christian Orthodoxy
    THE CORPUS HERMETICUM: A MIRROR FOR THE EVOLUTION OF CHRISTIAN ORTHODOXY By CHARLES FLOWERS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Charles Flowers 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Even an activity as solitary as researching history is never accomplished without the ongoing support and encouragement of others. To begin my foray into history, Sandy and Jimmy Pozzetta, Dr. Fred Gregory, and Dr. Jeff Needell were all instrumental in helping me move from one career to enter an entirely new one. Without their confidence, I could not have taken my initial steps. For the hard part of writing history--from analysis and understanding, to forming my own voice and gaining confidence in my own opinion--I am completely in debt to Dr. Andrea Sterk, Dr. Nina Caputo, and Dr. Howard Louthan. They have shared their time, skills, and opinions to make me a better historian and in the process, I have gained not only colleagues, but friends. Without their encouragement, I would never have succeeded along this journey. But my greatest thanks go to my wife Nikkie. The experience of extracting ideas from my head and having them appear coherent on the written page has not always been a pleasant one. She has endured many days in which my doubts threatened to overcome my progress. Throughout, she has always supported me and helped me to take the next step. Without her love, my success would have no meaning. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Sign Houses the Oldest House System
    Whole Sign Houses The Oldest House System An Ancient Method in Modern Application by Robert Hand ARHAT Publications ARHAT Ltd. 410 S. Rampart Blvd. Suite 390 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Copyright © 2000 Robert Hand Table of Contents Preface. ii The Oldest House System: Whole Sign Houses.. 1 The Notion of Place or Topos. 2 The Horoscope. 2 “Places” Aspecting the Horoscopic Sign. 3 Angular Houses Versus “Malefic” Aspects.. 7 The Origin of “Benefic” and “Malefic” Aspects.. 7 Historical Development.. 9 The Problem of Julius Firmicus Maternus. 14 The Advent of the Modern Type of House System.. 16 A Modern Solution to the Midheaven Problem.. 17 The Modern Practice with Whole-Sign Houses. 21 Whole-Sign Houses or Places Computed from Lots. 23 The Whole-Sign House “Cusps”.. 24 Examples.. 26 Conclusions.. 34 Chart Data and Sources.. 34 Appendix 1 – Horary Astrology and Whole-Sign Houses. 36 Appendix 2 – Glossary of Terms. 41 Appendix 3 – Are Only the Major (Ptolemaic) Aspects Valid?.. 45 Index.. 47 Preface The material contained in this book originally appeared in The Mountain Astrologer in the summer and fall of 1999. For the purposes of this publication there have been considerable revision and enlargement. First of all there have been some discoveries. In the original articles I stated that there was only one unambiguous reference to anything other than the system of houses presented here, and that was in the writings of Julius Firmicus Maternus (see page 14). According to the existing translation he appears to have used the Equal House system. Since then I have consulted the original Latin in which it appears that his use of equal houses is not as clearly established as I had previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Firmicus Maternus' 'Mathesis' and the Intellectual Culture of the Fourth
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository FIRMICUS MATERNUS’ MATHESIS AND THE INTELLECTUAL CULTURE OF THE FOURTH CENTURY AD Hannah Elizabeth Mace A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2017 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11039 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Firmicus Maternus’ Mathesis and the Intellectual Culture of the Fourth Century AD Hannah Elizabeth Mace This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews September 2016 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Hannah Elizabeth Mace, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September, 2012 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September, 2013; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2012 and 2016. Date ……………………………. signature of candidate …………………………………. 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • An Elaborate Horoscope for 319 CE and Its Significance for Greek Astronomical and Astrological Practice
    P.Berl. 9825: An elaborate horoscope for 319 CE and its significance... file:///Users/aj60/Downloads/Greenbaum and Jones 2017 PBerl 9825... The original version of this work, which is the one that should be cited, can be found via <http://isaw.nyu.edu/publications/isaw-papers>. ISAW Papers 12 (2017) P.Berl. 9825: An elaborate horoscope for 319 CE and its significance for Greek astronomical and astrological practice Dorian Greenbaum and Alexander Jones http://doi.org/2333.1/brv15m2n Abstract: The discovery of this elaborate horoscope in the Berlin papyrus collection is a milestone in the history of ancient horoscopes. The papyrus takes its place among very few such detailed horoscopes well preserved from antiquity. This paper discusses both the astronomical and astrological details of P.Berl. 9825, enumerating its contents and situating it within the broader historical and cultural context of astrological material from western antiquity. The first section outlines the physical details of the papyrus, its paleography, and the layout of the material among the different sections of the papyrus. It consists of seventeen columns spread among four framed sections. The beginning of the papyrus is lost, but enough remains to allow reconstruction of the date and time of the horoscope, in addition to the positions of the missing luminaries and planet (Saturn). A transcription and translation with apparatus and textual notes follow. A commentary in three parts follows the first section. Part 1 contains restorations, confirmations and corrections. This includes both a tabular summary of the data given in the horoscope, and a diagrammatic representation of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs As Houses (Places) in Ancient Astrology ______
    Signs as Houses (Places) in Ancient Astrology _________________________________________________________________ Robert Hand Abstract Previous work in the study of ancient horoscopes (Neugebauer, van Hoesen, North et al.) has suggested that ancient writers were deficient in their computations of horoscopes regarding the computation of the Midheaven degree and the cusps of ‘places’ or ‘houses’. This paper suggests that such was not necessarily the case and that these sources used the zodiacal signs, themselves, as ‘places’ and did not (with a few late exceptions) even try to compute the second twelve-fold division independent of the signs. The charts included in Neugebauer and van Hoesen’s Greek Horoscopes, and in Jones’ Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus (which include the bulk, if not all of, our surviving collection of ancient charts) are used as the basis of this research. Ptolemy and Julius Firmicus Maternus are also discussed for their apparent views on ‘places’. Examples are provided that suggest that this practice survived into the medieval Arabic tradition. The Problem It is generally known that in ancient, medieval, and modern astrology, a properly constructed astrological chart divides the ecliptic into twelve zones in two different ways. In modern astrology the first method of di- viding into the twelve zones creates the signs of the zodiac; the second method creates what are called, in modern astrology at least, the houses. But in ancient and also in much of medieval astrology what we now call ‘houses’ were called ‘places’ (Greek τόποι, Latin loci).1 The term ‘house’ (Greek οἴκος, Latin domus) at that time was used to designate a sign whenever that sign was referred to in relation to the one or more planets that were believed to ‘dispose of’, in some way rule or govern, or merely be at home in that sign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Rome in Late Antiquity
    The Idea of Rome in Late Antiquity Ioannis Papadopoulos Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History December 2018 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Ioannis Papadopoulos to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2018 The University of Leeds and Ioannis Papadopoulos 3 4 I N M E M O R I A M This Thesis is dedicated to the loving memory of my grandfather Constantine Nicolaou (1920-2011) and of my father Chris Papadopoulos (1953-2017) who departed too early to see this work complete, marking the beginning and the end of this research. ‘‘Ἀθάνατος ψυχὴ κοὐ χρῆμα σόν, ἀλλὰ προνοίας, ἣ μετὰ σῶμα μαρανθέν, ἅτ’ ἐκ δεσμῶν θοὸς ἵππος, ῥηιδίως προθοροῦσα κεράννυται ἠέρι κούφῳ δεινὴν καὶ πολύτλητον ἀποστέρξασα λατρείην· σοι δὲ τι τῶνδ’ ὄφελος, ὅ ποτ’ οὐκετ’ ἐὼν τότε δόξεις; ἢ τι μετὰ ζῳοῖσιν ἐὼν περὶ τῶνδε ματεύεις;’’ Philostratus, Τὰ ἐς τὸν Τυανέα Ἀπολλώνιον, IX, 31 5 Abstract The aim of this research is to approach and analyse the manifestation and evolution of the idea of Rome as an expression of Roman patriotism and as an (urban) archetype of utopia in late Roman thought in a period extending from AD 357 to 417.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrologers at Rome
    EXPELLING MISCONCEPTIONS: ASTROLOGERS AT ROME pauline ripat rederick Cramer published his magisterial Astrology in Roman Law and Politics in 1954. Though not the first discussion of the role of F astrology in Roman society and politics, 1 it has the air of being, if not the last word, at least the most authoritative. Its influence is witnessed by the frequency with which the work is referenced in successive scholarship that touches, however lightly, upon astrology or astrologers in Rome. The views Cramer espouses—that the science of astrology swept the Roman world to win the devotion of the Roman people and the Roman emperors, that em- perors consequently loved and feared astrology—have become standard in scholarly discussions and student textbooks alike. On this line of argument, it seems that the repeated expulsions of astrologers from Rome or Italy (at least eight times, and possibly as many as eleven between 139 b.c.e. and 175 c.e.) 2 require little more by way of explanation: expulsions of astrologers are the natural conclusions of general belief in the powerful science and conse- quent imperial ambivalence toward it. But in the decades since the question of why astrologers were expelled has been laid to rest, to my knowledge it has not been asked how the expulsions were undertaken. The introduction of this question instantly strips away the facade of historical certainty from the whole phenomenon. How were astrologers rounded up and forced from the city? And from “how?” we are immediately left grappling with another question that eludes easy grasp: “who?” How does one identify an astrologer so as to expel him? It then remains only to face the inexorable resurrection of “why?” It is the aim of this article to navigate the choppy historical waters we find ourselves plunged into, with the deflation of the convictions that have so long buoyed discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Constans' Image George Woudhuysen in an Academic Paper
    [This is the peer-reviewed version of the following book-chapter: G. Woudhuysen, ‘Uncovering Constans’ Image’ in D. Burgersdijk, A. Ross (eds.), Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire (Leiden, 2018), pp. 158-182, which has been published in its final form at https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004370920_009] L1 Chapter 7: Uncovering Constans’ Image George Woudhuysen In an academic paper, as in a panegyric, it is customary to begin with an apology for the difficulty of the topic and the writer’s inadequacy in its face: the mass of material baffles exposition, the author’s talent is thin, and (worse yet) people always make these excuses.1 So it might seem simply pro forma to say that trying to examine Constans in the light of his image, indeed in any light at all, is a daunting task: that does not make it any less true. Some emperors have many extant speeches in their praise or blame, some none, but Constantine’s youngest son—an Augustus for over a decade (337-350)—is unique in that half a panegyric about him survives, from the wrong half of the empire: the 59th oration of Libanius, expertly explicated elsewhere in this volume by Alan Ross.2 The thought that our image of Constans hangs by the slender thread of what the Antiochene sophist believed was relevant in the middle of the 340s is of little comfort: Nicomedia was a very long way from the emperor’s stamping grounds on the Rhine and Danube and Libanius never evinced any other interest in him.3 This lack of materials for history is why Constans normally has only three fleeting roles in the history of the fourth century: as victor in a brutal civil war with his elder brother Constantine II in 340, as the man who supplied a definitive riposte when Constantius II asked Athanasius ‘you and whose army?’ one time too many, and as a failure who died hunted and alone, in flight from the forces of the usurper Magnentius.4 The history of his reign has to be pieced together from inscriptions, laws, and compressed and often considerably later narratives.
    [Show full text]