District Census Handbook, Etah, Part X-A, Series-21, Uttar Pradesh

CENSUS 1971 PART X-A fOWN & VILLAGE DIRECTORY SERIES 21 UTTAR PRADESH DISTRICT DISTRICT ETAH CENSUS HANDBOOI( D. M. SINHA, OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SFRVlCE Director of Census OperatIOns Uttar Pradesh CONTENTS Page8 Acknowledgements Introductory Note iii-xvi TOWN & VILLAGE ~lRECTORY Town Directory Statement I-Status, Growth History and Functional Category of Towns 4-5 Statement I I-Physical Aspects and Location of Towns, 19v9 4-5 Statement TIl-Municipal Firance, 1968-69 6-7 Statement IV--Civic and Other Amenities, 1969 6-7 <;tatement V-Medlcal, Educational, Recreational and Cultural Facilities lU Towns, 1959 8-9 Statement VI--Trade, Commerce, Industry and Banking, 1969 8-9 Statement VII Population by Religion and Scheduled Castes/ScHeduled Tribes, 197] 10 Village Directory KASGAN] TAHSIL (i) Alphabetical List ofYi:llages 15-19 (ii) Village Directory (Ameni.ties and land u~e) 20-61 2 ]ALESAR TAHSIL (i) Alphabetical List of ViII ages 64-65 (il) Village Directory (Amenit:es and land use) 66-79- 3 ETAH TAHSIL (i) Alphabetical List of Villages 83-87 (ii) Village Directory (Amenities and land use) 88-127 4- ALIGANJ TAHSIL (i) Alphabetical List of Villages 130-133 (Ii) Village Directory (Amenities and land use) !34-169- APPENDIX Tahsilwise Abstract of Educational, MedIcal and Olt er Amenities given in Village Directory 170-171 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At the 1971 Census it has been Our endeavour to compile both Census and n<-.. - Census statistics at the village and block level in a uniform manner. To ensure that these statistics are available to the users as soon as these are sifted and compiled, the District Census Handbook has been divided into three parts. This is the first part of the series, the Village and Town Directory, which mostly comprises non-Census data. We are deeply indebted to the State Government for their ever willing and prompt help to us at all stages. The District Census Handbooks are being published by us on their behalf. I wish to express my gratitude to SrI M. Lal, Chief Secretary to U. P. Government, for all the guidance and facilities afforded to us in the conduct of Census in this State. I am also grateful to Sri p. C. Pandey, Secretary, G. A. D. (Now Commi ssioner, Rohilkhand DIVIsion, BareiIIy) and his successor Sri A. p. Dixit, for the facilities given by them in sorting out vanous administrative matters relating to the publication of these Handbooks. I am extremely thankful to the District Census Officers for their whole hearted eo-opera tion in furnishing the desired information and the District Census OffIcers for their hard work and sustained efforts in collecting the same. The programme for the printing of District Census Handbooks has been heavy indeed, more so as three parts are being published, one in Hindi and two in English. The arrangements made by Sri A. Dar, SUperintendent, Printmg and Stationery, U. P., Allahab:ld for the printing of these volumes, are thankfully acknowledged. Joint Superin tendent, Sn J. S. Gupta, In-charge New Government PresS' Aishbagh, Lucknow has also been extremely helpful in bringing out the maps. In the Census Office everyone has done something for this stupendous tusk of compilation and collation of statistics, preparation of notes and reading of proofs. r am grateful to Shri K. S. Sinha, Deputy Director, Headquarters, the Tabulation Officer, and other staff of the Technical Section, who have shared the burden and helped in bringing out these Handbooks. r must also express my gratitude to Sri A. Chandra Sekhar,Registrar General, India, Sri K. D. Ballal and Dr. B. K. Roy Burman, Deputy Registrars Genera) and Sri K. K. Chflkravorty, Central Tabulation Officer for their constant help and guidance despite their own heavy preoccupations. D. M. SINHA Lucknow DIrector of Census Operations, Dated, October 3, 1972 Uttar Pradesh. INTRODUCTORY NOTE 1. History of District Census Handbook. It has been customary to brmg out vital statIstICS at most of the Censuses. A 11st showing the population of villages III each district was published after the 1891 Census. Such information was, however, not brought out in 1901. Village Directories were prepared for all districts in 1911, but could be published only for thirteen due to the out break of the First World War. At the 1921 Census, these were published for all districts in the form of District Cemus Statistics. In 1931 vlllagewise st atistics were compiled but could not be published owing to financial stringency, resultmg in loss of valuable data. At the 1941 Census, restricted tabulation was undertaken in the wake of the Second World War, but the utility of Census statistics was recognised artd these were published. The District Census Handbook in its present form was brought out at the 1951 Census, and was pubh shed a10ngwith another volume titled District Population Statistics. In l!:l61 Census, attempts were made to render the District Census Handbook more informative, as in addition to Census data pertaining to each village, data about its level of development and amenities were also collected. At the 1971 Census, efforts have been made to compile both Cenus and non-Census statistics at viIIage{town level in a uniform manner with an enlarged scope. As the District Census Handbook makes Census statistics available for the smaller territonal units, it is constantly referred to for several purposes of administration, demar cation of electoral constituencies, planning and development and so on. To ensure that these statistics are available to the users early, the District Census Handbook has been divided for being Published separately into three Parts. Part A: Town and Village Directory. Part B 0 Village and Town-wise Primary Census Abstract. Part C: Analytical Report and Administrative Statements--Distnct Census Tables. 2. Scope of District Census Handbook. Part A of the Handbook comprises the Town and Village Direct.ory. In Village DireC1:ory, particulars of amenities in regard toEducation, MedIcal, Power supply, drinking water supply, Post and telegraph and Communications ,have been give,n. Besides, it contains land-use statistics, days of weekly markets and places of religious, historical or archaeological interest in each village. The Town Directory comprising seven statements throws I1ght on the status of the town, its origin, growth of population, functIOnal category, location and physical aspects, Municipal finances, CiVIC and other amenities, Medical and Education facilities and statistics pertaining to Trade, Commerce, Industry and Banki:v-g. Apart from these, it also gives the distnbution of population of a town by religion and Scheduled Castes{Scheduled Tribes. Part B represents data down to VIllage level for rural area and block level for t(JWllS. It contains the Primary Census Abstract which lUcorporates figures of area, number of occupied residential houses and households, total population and its break-up by sex, scheduled caste and scheduled tribe, literate populatIOn, working populatlOn by nine broad industrial categories of cultivators, agricultural labourers, workers engaged III forestry and livestock etc., in mining and quarrying, in manufacture or repair, in construction, in trade and commerce, in transport and communicatlOns and in other services as well as the non working population. ( iv ) Palt C deals with the administrative statistics pertaining to the district in all fIeIes. of development. The Census table~ pertaining to language, religion, migration and eco'1omic activities are being reproduced in this part. A write up indicating changes in socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the district during the last decade is also being included in it. 3. Town Directory given in Part A presents data for all the Census towns of the district. There is no uniformly accepted definition of a town. The historical, poli tical, cultural and administrative considerations are generally taken as criteria for rural urban classification. An urban area, in contradistinction to the rural, comprises a large m1.jority of inhabitants who are engaged in industrial and non-agricultural activItIes. In addition to its size;"'lapopulatlOn and occupational characteristics, an urban 'area provide~ such facilities as transportation, banking, commercial fl.nd teohnical services, community facdities and other civic services. According to the State Government, all MUlllcipaf Corporations, Municipal Boards, Cantonment Boards, NotIfied Areas and Town Areas. are considered as towns, and according to their average annual income from thf'ir own resources, these have been classified into different classes of local bodies. The crl'eria adopted under the Census Operations is slightly dIfferent from the State Government. In 1971 Census all places satisfying the following conditions have been treated Towns :- 1. All Municipal Corporations, Municipal Boards, Cantonments & Notified Arem_ 2. All localities though not in themselves local bodies but forming Rart of a cIty or town agglomeration. 3. Other places satisfYing all the three under mentioned conditions ~ (1) PopulatIon exceeds 5,eOO. (ii) At least 75% of the male working population engages in non-agncultural pursuits, and (IiI) The density of population exceeds 1,000 persons per sq. mile (386 persons pef sq. km.) The information given in the Town Directory relates to'the year 1969. The data has been presented III the following seven statements: (a) Statement 1--This statement presents the population of the towns at the enJ of each decade from 1901 to 1971, the CIvic status

Load more