Laguna Province, the Philippines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Overseas Field Work Report 2000: Laguna Province, The Philippines Graduate School of International Development Nagoya University Overseas Fieldwork Report 2000: Laguna Province, The Philippines March 2001 Graduate School of International Development Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Overseas Fieldwork Report 2001 Laguna Province, The Philippines Copyright©2001 Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University Furo-cho Chikusa-ku. Nagoya, Japan 464-8601 http://www.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/ Introduction It was in the evening of July 24, at a Hotel in Hokkaido, when I received the fax from Dr. Osada, Dean of the Graduate School of International Development (GSID), Nagoya University, in which he proposed to change the site for the ninth annual Overseas Fieldwork (OFW 2000). A travel advisory issued by Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs covering Bohol province and other places in the Philippines, affected his final decision. As program director, I accepted his judgment. In January 2000, with a generous subsidy from the Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FACID), members from OFW Committee and professors from the University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB) visited several places in Laguna Province and Bohol Province to look for suitable sites for OFW 2000. After many heated discussions – both provinces were highly evaluated for their attractive sites and open-minded municipal and provincial government officials, they eventually decided on Bohol. We unfortunately gave up Bohol in July for security reasons, however, fortunately Laguna was still in our hands. Of course, the sudden change of locations from Bohol to Laguna added extra work for our colleagues from UPLB, even though Laguna is their home province. Students participated in weekly seminars to prepare for OFW 2000: 1) Using diverse approaches, the twenty-eight participants comprehensively studied the current situation in the Philippines from May 17 to July 19. Professor Rufino S. Mananghaya, a visiting professor from UPLB, and several colleagues from GSID managed these seminars. 2) From August 28 to September 1, participants improved their discussion skills utilizing Project Cycle Management (PCM) - a tool designed to moderate interactive discussion among stakeholders in participatory development projects. Ms. Yuriko Minamoto and staff from FACID, the creators of PCM, moderated the seminars. 3) The participants were divided by their interests into four Working Groups and each group made up an interim research plan during September 18 - 21. OFW 2000 was conducted during October 9 - 27. The OFW Committee did not set specific methods or formats for group work; rather, we left a free hand to each working group. Groups organized their activit ies in consultation with UPLB advis ers. Working Group 1 focused on small and medium enterprises in Laguna, identifying problems and proposing possible solutions; Working Group 2A took on the formal education in the Philippines, observing bilingual education, health education and secondary education; Working Group 2B surveyed technical/vocational education and training, and outlined labor markets in Laguna; Working Group 3 tackled water supply systems in the Philippines from the perspective of privatization, evaluating the merits and demerits of privatization; Working Group 4 profiled tourism in Pagsanjan, measuring the impact of tourism on the local community. It is great pleasure for me to introduce Overseas Fieldwork Report 2000, composed of four Group Reports and i thirteen Individual Reports chosen by the OFW Committee. Program Director Kimiaki Takahashi Acknowledgement The Committee of OFW2000 is indebted to many people and institutions both in the Philippines and Japan for the successful completion of this year’s program. Our thanks are first due to the people of Laguna Province. We are especially grateful to the Governor and all the experts of the Provincial Government for their precious support and cordial hospitality. We also would like to express our sincere gratitude to all of those who kindly gave us helpful information in the interviews. Next our thanks are due to the advisors from UPLB : Professor Wilfredo B. Carada (Director), Professor Constancia Z. Rosacia, Professor Romeo B. Obedoza , Professor Rufino S. Mananghaya and Professor Mimosa C. Ocampo. Their close and dedicated collaboration was truly indispensable for the accomplishment of the whole program. We should not forget to thank the students of UPLB who helped GSID students as translators and joint researchers all through the period of the fieldwork. Last but not least, we are very grateful to those who provided valuable instruction to our students in the PCM Intensive Preparatory Course and the Weekly Seminar: Ms. Yu riko Minamoto, Ms. Akemi Ishikawa and several students of GSID, who acted as moderators in the PCM course, and Professor Hirotsune Kimura, Professor Hiroshi Osada of GSID, again Professor Rufino S. Mananghaya from UPLB, who gave lectures on the various topics of the Philippines in the seminar, and finally Mr. Acosta Roberto Reyes in doctor program of GSID, supported the Weekly Seminar and fieldwork in Laguna Province, and corrected four Group Reports and thirteen Individual Reports in this volume. Committee on OFW-2000 Kimiaki Takahashi, Professor and Project Director Yutaka Otsuka, Professor Tomoki Okuda, Associate Professor Office of OFW Etsuko Sugiyama, Research Associate ii Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................i Acknowlegement.................................................................................................................... ii OFW 2000 PHI Participants ............................................................................................... iii Programs of OFW 2000-PHI ...............................................................................................vi 1. Preparatory Seminar.........................................................................................................................vi 2. Field research ....................................................................................................................................vii Working group 1 Situation Analysis of Small and Medium Enterprises in Laguna .................................1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. The Definition of SMEs ................................................................................................................... 3 3. SMEs in the Philippines ................................................................................................................... 4 4. SMEs in Laguna ................................................................................................................................. 7 5. Problem Analysis .............................................................................................................................16 6. Possible Solutions............................................................................................................................18 7. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................................20 Working Group 2 A. The Current Situation of Formal Education in the Philippines..............................27 0. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................28 1. The lack of textbooks ......................................................................................................................30 2. Bilingual Education .........................................................................................................................33 3. Influence of Health Education......................................................................................................34 4. Secondary Education as a Pre-stage of Working .....................................................................38 5. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................................40 B. Technical/Vocational Education and Training in Laguna.........................................42 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................42 2. The Structure of Technical/Vocational Education and Training in the Philippines ........43 3. Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Programs in the Province of Laguna ...........................................................................................46 4. The Labor Market Situation in the Province of Laguna ........................................................48 5. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................................50 Working Group 3 An Inquiry of the Water Supply Situation in The Philippines...................................57 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................58 2. Methodology and Case Description ............................................................................................60