DOCSLIB.ORG

Metalamprophyre Dike Deformation in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metalamprophyre Dike Deformation in The METALAMPROPHYRE DIKE DEFORMATION IN THE HOMESTAKE RESERVOIR QUADRANGLE, LEADVILLE, COLORADO by Michael Geoffrey Frothingham A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2017 © COPYRIGHT by Michael Geoffrey Frothingham 2017 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colin A. Shaw is gratefully acknowledged as my supervisor and for the direction and revision of this project. Additional committee members are Mary S. Hubbard and David W. Mogk. This work was undertaken with partial financial assistance from the Graduate School at Montana State University, the United States Geological Survey EDMAP grant number G15AC00175, the Montana Association of Geographic Information Professionals, the Barry C. Bishop Scholarship at Montana State University, and NSF award number 1525590 to Concord University (J. Allen and S. Kuehn). I would also like to thank my family, friends, Flysch, undergraduate research assistants Natali Kragh and Matthew Mersen, fellow graduate students in the bullpen, and Chester A. Ruleman of the USGS; because of whom my life, research, and future career as a field geologist are fundamentally metamorphosed. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Location .......................................................................................................................... 2 Geologic Setting of the Northern Sawatch Range .......................................................... 5 Regional Tectonic History .............................................................................................. 5 Paleoproterozoic ..................................................................................................... 5 Mazatzal Province — Model 1 ............................................................................... 6 Mazatzal Province — Model 2 ............................................................................... 7 Mesoproterozoic ..................................................................................................... 9 Late Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic ............................................................. 13 Phanerozoic ........................................................................................................... 13 Previous Mapping ......................................................................................................... 14 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................... 16 Field Work .................................................................................................................... 16 Data Collection and Field Mapping ...................................................................... 16 Sample Collection ................................................................................................. 17 Laboratory Work .......................................................................................................... 18 Map Digitization ................................................................................................... 18 Stereonets .............................................................................................................. 19 Thin Section Preparation....................................................................................... 20 Microscope Petrography ....................................................................................... 20 TitaniQ Thermometry ................................................................................................... 21 3. ROCK DESCRIPTIONS .............................................................................................. 23 Paleoproterozoic Gneiss ............................................................................................... 23 Biotite Gneiss ........................................................................................................ 23 Hornblende Gneiss ................................................................................................ 26 Micaceous Quartzite ............................................................................................. 28 Calc-Silicate Gneiss .............................................................................................. 30 Mesoproterozoic Igneous Rocks .................................................................................. 32 Metalamprophyre .................................................................................................. 32 St. Kevin Granite .................................................................................................. 37 Mesoproterozoic Shear Zone Tectonites ...................................................................... 39 Mylonite Shear Tectonites .................................................................................... 39 Pseudotachylyte Shear Tectonites ......................................................................... 41 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS — CONTINUED 4. STRUCTURAL DOMAINS ......................................................................................... 42 Structural Domain I — Homestake Shear Zone ........................................................... 44 Structural Domain II — Hornblende Gneiss, Calc-Silicate Gneiss, and Metalamprophyres .............................................................. 45 Structural Domain III — Slide Lake Shear Zone ......................................................... 46 Structural Domain IV — St. Kevin Batholith .............................................................. 47 Structural Domain V — Paleozoic Sedimentary Cover ............................................... 48 Structural Domain VI — Upper Arkansas Basin ......................................................... 48 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 48 5. KEY FIELD RELATIONS ........................................................................................... 50 Paleoproterozoic Gneiss ............................................................................................... 50 Location ................................................................................................................ 50 Orientation ............................................................................................................ 51 Age ........................................................................................................................ 51 Mesoproterozoic Metalamprophyres ............................................................................ 52 Location ................................................................................................................ 52 Orientation ............................................................................................................ 52 Age ........................................................................................................................ 54 Mesoproterozoic St. Kevin Granite .............................................................................. 56 Location ................................................................................................................ 56 Orientation ............................................................................................................ 56 Age ........................................................................................................................ 56 Mesoproterozoic Shear Deformation ........................................................................... 57 Location ................................................................................................................ 57 Orientation ............................................................................................................ 57 Shear Sense Indicators .......................................................................................... 57 Age ........................................................................................................................ 60 6. TEMPERATURE OF DEFORMATION ..................................................................... 62 Metalamprophyres and St. Kevin Granite .................................................................... 62 Deformation Textures ........................................................................................... 62 TitaniQ .................................................................................................................. 63 Regional Deformation .................................................................................................. 65 v TABLE OF CONTENTS — CONTINUED 7. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................... 67 Timeline of Geologic Events ........................................................................................ 67 Inherited Structural Control .......................................................................................... 71 Temperature of Deformation ........................................................................................ 72 Continuum of Deformation .......................................................................................... 74 Intracontinental Deformation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Proterozoic History of the Idaho Springs-Ralston Shear Zone: Evidence for a Widespread Ca
    THE PROTEROZOIC HISTORY OF THE IDAHO SPRINGS-RALSTON SHEAR ZONE: EVIDENCE FOR A WIDESPREAD CA. 1.4 GA OROGENIC EVENT IN CENTRAL COLORADO by Madison Lytle A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date _____________________________ Signed: __________________________________ Madison Lytle Signed: __________________________________ Dr. Yvette D. Kuiper Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date _____________________________ Signed: _________________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Department Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Idaho Springs-Ralston shear zone (IRSZ) is one of several Proterozoic NE-trending zones within the central-eastern Colorado Front Range. The zone is composed of multiple mylonitic strands of a few meters to several kilometers in width and is mapped from ~16 km NNW of Denver, CO to ~26 km to the SW (near Idaho Springs, CO). The IRSZ and other NE-trending zones have previously been interpreted as ~1.45 Ga reactivated shear zones, following a pre-existing crustal-scale weakness, such as a suture zone that formed at ~1.7 Ga. The interpreted suture zone was based on the presence of tectonic mélange at the St. Louis Lake shear zone, ~40 km NNW of the IRSZ, suggesting the presence of a subduction zone. New field data suggest that the IRSZ is not as extensive as previously interpreted. Additionally, a lack of pinch outs and offset of major units, as well as similar deformation histories and metamorphic conditions on either side suggest that the IRSZ did not form as a continental suture zone.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
    Volume 50, Number 5 GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA www.geosociety.org/rm-mtg Sunset Crater is a cinder cone located north of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Program 05-RM-cvr.indd 1 2/27/2018 4:17:06 PM Program Joint Meeting Rocky Mountain Section, 70th Meeting Cordilleran Section, 114th Meeting Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 15–17 May 2018 2018 Meeting Committee General Chair . Paul Umhoefer Rocky Mountain Co-Chair . Dennis Newell Technical Program Co-Chairs . Nancy Riggs, Ryan Crow, David Elliott Field Trip Co-Chairs . Mike Smith, Steven Semken Short Courses, Student Volunteer . Lisa Skinner Exhibits, Sponsorship . Stephen Reynolds GSA Rocky Mountain Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Janet Dewey Vice Chair . Kevin Mahan Past Chair . Amy Ellwein Secretary/Treasurer . Shannon Mahan GSA Cordilleran Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Susan Cashman Vice Chair . Michael Wells Past Chair . Kathleen Surpless Secretary/Treasurer . Calvin Barnes Sponors We thank our sponsors below for their generous support. School of Earth and Space Exploration - Arizona State University College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Sciences University of Arizona Geosciences (Arizona LaserChron Laboratory - ALC, Arizona Radiogenic Helium Dating Lab - ARHDL) School of Earth Sciences & Environmental Sustainability - Northern Arizona University Arizona Geological Survey - sponsorship of the banquet Prof . Stephen J Reynolds, author of Exploring Geology, Exploring Earth Science, and Exploring Physical Geography - sponsorship of the banquet NOTICE By registering for this meeting, you have acknowledged that you have read and will comply with the GSA Code of Conduct for Events (full code of conduct listed on page 31) .
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Shinumo-Sespe Drainage Connection: Arguments Against the “Old” (70–17 Ma) Grand Canyon Models for Colorado GEOSPHERE, V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II GEOSPHERE Evaluating the Shinumo-Sespe drainage connection: Arguments against the “old” (70–17 Ma) Grand Canyon models for Colorado GEOSPHERE, v. 16, no. 6 Plateau drainage evolution https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02265.1 Karl E. Karlstrom1, Carl E. Jacobson2,3, Kurt E. Sundell4, Athena Eyster5, Ron Blakey6, Raymond V. Ingersoll7, Jacob A. Mulder8, Richard A. Young9, 18 figures; 1 table; 1 set of supplemental files L. Sue Beard10, Mark E. Holland11, David L. Shuster12,13, Carmen Winn1, and Laura Crossey1 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] 2Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA 3Department of Earth and Space Sciences, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19383, USA 4Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA CITATION: Karlstrom, K.E., Jacobson, C.E., Sun dell, 5Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA K.E., Eyster, A., Blakey, R., Ingersoll, R.V., Mulder, 6Colorado Plateau Geosystems, Phoenix, Arizona 85032, USA J.A., Young, R.A., Beard, L.S., Holland, M.E., Shus- 7Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA ter, D.L., Winn, C., and Crossey, L., 2020, Evaluating 8School of
    [Show full text]
  • Do Proterozoic Metamorphic Rocks in Northern New Mexico Record One
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2016 Do Proterozoic Metamorphic Rocks in Northern New Mexico Record One Metamorphic Event At 1.4 Ga, or Two Overprinting Events At 1.65 GA and 1.4 GA Sara Vivienne Stotter Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Recommended Citation Stotter, Sara Vivienne, "Do Proterozoic Metamorphic Rocks in Northern New Mexico Record One Metamorphic Event At 1.4 Ga, or Two Overprinting Events At 1.65 GA and 1.4 GA" (2016). Honors Theses. 355. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/355 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Chris Daniel, for his unwavering guidance, encouragement, patience, and support throughout the course of my research project. Sophomore year, when I first started doing work with Dr. Daniel, I never imagined that I would accomplish and learn so much, and I am truly grateful for his insight and mentoring. He always pushed me to do my best, and continually challenged me to think critically which allowed me to reach my goals and excel beyond them. I would also like to thank Dr. Mary Beth Gray for her kind words and endless motivation that kept me going even in the most stressful of times.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Isotopic Evidence from Glacial Igneous Clasts, and Links With
    $FFHSWHG0DQXVFULSW 3URWHUR]RLFFUXVWDOHYROXWLRQRIFHQWUDO(DVW$QWDUFWLFD$JHDQGLVRWRSLFHYL GHQFHIURPJODFLDOLJQHRXVFODVWVDQGOLQNVZLWK$XVWUDOLDDQG/DXUHQWLD -RKQ:*RRGJH&0DUN)DQQLQJ&KULVWRSKHU0)LVKHU-HIIUH\'9HUYRRUW 3,, 6 ; '2, KWWSG[GRLRUJMSUHFDPUHV 5HIHUHQFH 35(&$0 7RDSSHDULQ Precambrian Research 5HFHLYHG'DWH )HEUXDU\ 5HYLVHG'DWH -XO\ $FFHSWHG'DWH -XO\ 3OHDVHFLWHWKLVDUWLFOHDV-:*RRGJH&0DUN)DQQLQJ&0)LVKHU-'9HUYRRUW3URWHUR]RLFFUXVWDOHYROXWLRQ RIFHQWUDO(DVW$QWDUFWLFD$JHDQGLVRWRSLFHYLGHQFHIURPJODFLDOLJQHRXVFODVWVDQGOLQNVZLWK$XVWUDOLDDQG /DXUHQWLDPrecambrian Research GRLKWWSG[GRLRUJMSUHFDPUHV 7KLVLVD3')ILOHRIDQXQHGLWHGPDQXVFULSWWKDWKDVEHHQDFFHSWHGIRUSXEOLFDWLRQ$VDVHUYLFHWRRXUFXVWRPHUV ZHDUHSURYLGLQJWKLVHDUO\YHUVLRQRIWKHPDQXVFULSW7KHPDQXVFULSWZLOOXQGHUJRFRS\HGLWLQJW\SHVHWWLQJDQG UHYLHZRIWKHUHVXOWLQJSURRIEHIRUHLWLVSXEOLVKHGLQLWVILQDOIRUP3OHDVHQRWHWKDWGXULQJWKHSURGXFWLRQSURFHVV HUURUVPD\EHGLVFRYHUHGZKLFKFRXOGDIIHFWWKHFRQWHQWDQGDOOOHJDOGLVFODLPHUVWKDWDSSO\WRWKHMRXUQDOSHUWDLQ Proterozoic crustal evolution of central East Antarctica: Age and isotopic evidence from glacial igneous clasts, and links with Australia and Laurentia John W. Goodge 1*, C. Mark Fanning2, Christopher M. Fisher3† and Jeffrey D. Vervoort3 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812 USA (correspondence: [email protected]) 2 Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia ([email protected]) 3 School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA ([email protected],
    [Show full text]
  • (U-Th)/He Thermochronology of the Santa Impact Crater (New
    Zircon U-Pb and (U-Th)/He thermochronology of the Santa Impact Crater (New Mexico, USA): evidence for a Paleozoic asteroid breakup? Rayssa Martins Pimentel Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder Defended April 4, 2018 Thesis Advisor Stephen J. Mojzsis Committee Members Stephen J. Mojzsis, Department of Geological Sciences Nigel M. Kelly, Department of Geological Sciences Nick Schneider, Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Brian Hynek, Department of Geological Sciences Abstract The age of the Santa Fe Impact Structure (SFIS) is poorly constrained. Here, I examine the employability of the U-Th/He system in zircon and apatite extracted from shatter cones of the SFIS – some of Which Were previously analyzed for their U-Pb ages – to better constrain the age of this impact structure, Which lacks a preserved melt sheet, and has a complex, post-impact tectonic and thermal history. To achieve this, zircon and apatite grains Were separated from shatter cone samples. Grains were selected to span a range of apparent radiation damage to access a range of He retentivities. Where possible, grains preserving planar fractures (PFs) Were also included. U-Th/He dates from apatite predominantly record cooling from Laramide burial (c. 60 Ma), correlating With published apatite fission track dates. In contrast, U- Th/He dates from zircon have a Wider range (334.87 ± 13.56 Ma to 7.88 ± 0.22 Ma) and shoW a pronounced negative correlation With effective uranium content. The preservation of dates (n=3) that are older than the age of Laramide resetting in apatite demonstrates that loW eU zircons are promising candidates for both recording and preserving the age of the impact.
    [Show full text]
  • And Picuris (1.45 Ga) Orogenies Karl E
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/67 U-Pb Monazite and 40Ar/39Ar data supporting polyphase tectonism in the Manzano Mountains: a record of both the Mazatzal (1.66-1.60 Ga) and Picuris (1.45 Ga) Orogenies Karl E. Karlstrom, Michael L. Williams, Matthew T. Heizler, Mark E. Holland, Tyler A. Grambling, and Jeff M. Amato, 2016, pp. 177-184 in: Guidebook 67 - Geology of the Belen Area, Frey, Bonnie A.; Karlstrom, Karl E. ; Lucas, Spencer G.; Williams, Shannon; Ziegler, Kate; McLemore, Virginia; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana S., New Mexico Geological Society 67th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 512 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2016 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic Assembly of North America: Insight from the Interactions of Deformation, Metamorphism and Magmatism in the Southwestern United States
    PROTEROZOIC ASSEMBLY OF NORTH AMERICA: INSIGHT FROM THE INTERACTIONS OF DEFORMATION, METAMORPHISM AND MAGMATISM IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Robert Alexander Hunter August 2013 © 2013 Robert Alexander Hunter PROTEROZOIC ASSEMBLY OF NORTH AMERICA: INSIGHT FROM THE INTERACTIONS OF DEFORMATION, METAMORPHISM AND MAGMATISM IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES Robert Alexander Hunter, Ph. D. Cornell University One of the major goals of the geoscience community is to develop an accurate tectonic history of North America. Understanding how our continent evolved through time has numerous implications for our ability to develop accurate models of the tectonic evolution of continents – how they form, deform, and break. The interactions of deformation, metamorphism, and plutonism, three fundamental geological processes at work throughout the evolution of continents, record information that can be used to better understand the mechanisms and events that have shaped our continent. This dissertation employs metamorphic petrology, structural geology, geochemistry and geothermobarometry to interrogate the interactions of deformation, metamorphism and plutonism on multiple scales across the southwest United States. On a microscope scale, this dissertation shows that deformation and metamorphism can work in a positive feedback loop, facilitated by solution mass transfer, to localize both
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian
    RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian sedimentary rocks associated with the Ancestral Rocky Mountains orogeny in southwestern Laurentia: Implications for continental-scale Laurentian sediment transport systems Ryan J. Leary1, Paul Umhoefer2, M. Elliot Smith2, Tyson M. Smith3, Joel E. Saylor4, Nancy Riggs2, Greg Burr2, Emma Lodes2, Daniel Foley2, Alexis Licht5, Megan A. Mueller5, and Chris Baird5 1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY, SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 87801, USA 2SCHOOL OF EARTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86011, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77204, USA 4DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA V6T1Z4, CANADA 5DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195, USA ABSTRACT The Ancestral Rocky Mountains system consists of a series of basement-cored uplifts and associated sedimentary basins that formed in southwestern Laurentia during Early Pennsylvanian–middle Permian time. This system was originally recognized by aprons of coarse, arkosic sandstone and conglomerate within the Paradox, Eagle, and Denver Basins, which surround the Front Range and Uncompahgre basement uplifts. However, substantial portions of Ancestral Rocky Mountain–adjacent basins are filled with carbonate or fine-grained quartzose material that is distinct from proximal arkosic rocks, and detrital zircon data from basins adjacent to the Ancestral Rocky Moun- tains have been interpreted to indicate that a substantial proportion of their clastic sediment was sourced from the Appalachian and/or Arctic orogenic belts and transported over long distances across Laurentia into Ancestral Rocky Mountain basins. In this study, we pres- ent new U-Pb detrital zircon data from 72 samples from strata within the Denver Basin, Eagle Basin, Paradox Basin, northern Arizona shelf, Pedregosa Basin, and Keeler–Lone Pine Basin spanning ~50 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Detrital Zircon Evidence for Mixing of Mazatzal Province Age Detritus with Yavapai Age (Ca
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2014 Detrital Zircon Evidence for Mixing of Mazatzal Province Age Detritus With Yavapai Age (ca. 1700-1740 Ma) and Older Detritus in the ca. 1650 Ma Mazatzal Province of Central New Mexico, USA Daniel Patrick Wallace Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Recommended Citation Wallace, Daniel Patrick, "Detrital Zircon Evidence for Mixing of Mazatzal Province Age Detritus With Yavapai Age (ca. 1700-1740 Ma) and Older Detritus in the ca. 1650 Ma Mazatzal Province of Central New Mexico, USA" (2014). Honors Theses. 269. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/269 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETRITAL ZIRCON EVIDENCE FOR MIXING OF MAZATZAL PROVINCE AGE DETRITUS WITH YAVAPAI AGE (CA. 1700-1740 MA.) AND OLDER DETRITUS IN THE CA. 1650 MA. MAZATZAL PROVINCE OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, USA By Daniel P. Wallace A Thesis Presented to the Honors Committee In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science with Honors in Geology Bucknell University May 2014 Approved : Christopher G. Daniel Thesis Advisor, Department of Geology, Bucknell University Jeffrey M. Trop Chair, Department of Geology , Bucknell University 2 3 DETRITAL ZIRCON EVIDENCE FOR MIXING OF MAZATZAL PROVINCE AGE DETRITUS WITH YAVAPAI AGE (CA. 1700-1740 MA.) AND OLDER DETRITUS IN THE CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Location for the Yavapai-Mazatzal Crustal Province Boundary in New Mexico: Hf Isotopic Data from Proterozoic Rocks of the Nacimiento Mountains T
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/66 Revised location for the Yavapai-Mazatzal crustal province boundary in New Mexico: Hf isotopic data from Proterozoic rocks of the Nacimiento Mountains T. A. Grambling, M. Holland, K. E. Karlstromn, G. E. Gehrels, and M. Pecha, 2015, pp. 175-184 in: Guidebook 66 - Geology of the Las Vegas Area, Lindline, Jennifer; Petronis, Michael; Zebrowski, Joseph, New Mexico Geological Society 66th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 312 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2015 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Magmatism and Metamorphism at Ca. 1.45 Ga in the Northern Gawler Craton: the Australian Record of Rifting Within Nuna (Columbia)
    Geoscience Frontiers 10 (2019) 175e194 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Geoscience Frontiers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf Research Paper Magmatism and metamorphism at ca. 1.45 Ga in the northern Gawler Craton: The Australian record of rifting within Nuna (Columbia) Laura J. Morrissey a,b,*, Karin M. Barovich b, Martin Hand b, Katherine E. Howard b, Justin L. Payne a a School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia b Department of Earth Sciences, School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia article info abstract Article history: UePb monazite and zircon geochronology and calculated metamorphic phase diagrams from drill holes Received 28 February 2018 in the northern Gawler Craton, southern Australia, reveal the presence of ca. 1.45 Ga magmatism and Received in revised form metamorphism. Magmatism and granulite facies metamorphism of this age has not previously been 14 June 2018 recognised in the Gawler Craton. The magmatic rocks have steep LREE-enriched patterns and high Ga/Al Accepted 16 July 2018 values, suggesting they are A-type granites. Calculated metamorphic forward models suggest that this Available online 24 August 2018 e Handling Editor: M. Santosh event was associated with high apparent thermal gradients and reached pressures of 3.2 5.4 kbar and temperatures of 775e815 C. The high apparent thermal gradients may reflect pluton-enhanced Keywords: metamorphism, consistent with the presence of A-type granites. The recognition of ca. 1.45 Ga tecto- e Gawler Craton nism in the northern Gawler Craton is added to a compilation of ca.
    [Show full text]