DOCSLIB.ORG

Quasi-Barbarians' and ‗Wandering Jews': the Balfour Declaration In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quasi-Barbarians' and ‗Wandering Jews': the Balfour Declaration In ‗QUASI-BARBARIANS‘ AND ‗WANDERING JEWS‘: THE BALFOUR DECLARATION IN LIGHT OF WORLD EVENTS By MARYANNE AGNES RHETT A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of History AUGUST 2008 © Copyright by MARYANNE AGNES RHETT, 2008 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by MARYANNE AGNES RHETT, 2008 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation/thesis of MARYANNE AGNES RHETT find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT There are a number of people I feel a deep sense of gratitude toward in helping me get to the final stage of this process. Above all others, my sister Sarah has suffered through numerous run-on sentences, poor attempts at alliteration, and various Shiva-like ‗hands.‘ As a result, Sarah knows more about the Balfour Declaration than anyone else should, poor thing. But, where Sarah‘s help and support has been so has been my parents‘. Their love and support in this experience cannot be overstated. Their patience as I endeavor through yet another degree, in a state still farther from home has been amazing. Mom and Dad have encouraged me with their keen interest and unwavering desire to see the whole picture. To Sarah, Mom, and Dad: I love you! Thank you, from the bottom of my heart. Without my friends and colleagues, the Ph.D. process would have been disastrous. Amy Canfield, I mean, Dr. Amy Canfield, and I spent days on end struggling to get through the program, and the daily toils of graduate life. It seemed sometimes as if the illuminati would not prevail. Even from across the state she has helped remind me why I am doing this. Without her friendship (and sarcasm), it would have been a very different, and far less enjoyable, process. To Dr. Aditi Sen, too I am indebted for the coffee, the beer, the games, and the gossip. I am glad I had to opportunity to come to Vancouver. Similarly, Aaron Whelchel, Amitava Chowdhury, and Barbara Traver (of whom more than thanks for just being a friend should be said) have worked right alongside me in their own doctoral adventures. Knowing that I am not going through this alone has been an immeasurable help. And finally, Colin Meckel has been by my side in more iii anxious moments at the end of this whole thing than almost anyone. He has let me have my moments of near insanity and is still there to help me relax and have fun, not forgetting that the dissertation is important, but reminding me that it is not the only thing in life. I look forward to reaping the benefits of all of this hard work with him and all my friends and family in the coming months and years! My professors. In 1996, as a freshman in an international studies class at the University of South Carolina I first met Edwin Montagu, and it is Dr. Shahrough Akhavi I have to thank. Dr. Akhavi has been, and continues to be, a huge influence on my life. However, while he saw me through my most trying academic years, it was at Washington State University, under the guidance of Drs. Heather Streets and Robert Staab, that I ultimately developed my academic voice. Dr. Streets has been a dear friend and a dedicated professor. She has helped me improve my writing and my intellectual pursuits to a degree such that I really feel ready for my next academic challenge. Dr. Staab has been my Middle East confident. We were unique in our interest in the turmoil and turbulence of the Middle East, and to him I owe the deepest debt of gratitude for keeping me on track and focused. I could not have gotten here, or the places I have yet to go, without their help. Finally, no historian does her (or his) work without those wonderful people who bring to us the documents upon which it solidly rests. I spent enormous amounts of time in England combing through a variety of manuscripts and governmental documents and never once did I have a negative experience in the archives. The Wren Library at Trinity College Cambridge, the Public Records Office at Kew, the British Library, the London Metropolitan Archives, and the House of Lords Archives at Parliament were all wonderful places to work. With friendly, patient, and helpful staff the research experience was made immensely easier. I look forward to returning iv soon. What is more, without the generous financial support from the Gillis family, the Cooney family, and the Tauber Institute for the Study of European Jewry, none of those hours in the archives would have been possible. Thank you all. v ‗QUASI-BARBARIANS‘ AND ‗WANDERING JEWS‘: THE BALFOUR DECLARATION IN LIGHT OF WORLD EVENTS Abstract by Maryanne Agnes Rhett, Ph.D. Washington State University August 2008 Chair: Heather E. Streets On 2 November 1917, the British government formally issued the Balfour Declaration, one of the most important documents in defining the Middle East for the coming century. The Declaration laid the groundwork for the eventual creation of the state of Israel while at the same time problematizing the concept of ‗nation‘ for the entire world. This dissertation looks beyond the two traditional explanations for why the Declaration was created: British martial and imperial wartime need or the moral obligation felt by some influential politicians to the world‘s Jewry. These accounts, while useful and necessary, only narrowly demonstrate the document‘s significance, exclude factors which helped to create it, and prevent an examination of those global realities which developed as a result of its issuance. Instead, this work examines the Declaration in terms of the global context, broadening the scope of the document‘s significance and creating a clearer picture of the global community as a composite of individual actors, regional pressures, and trans-regional realities. Crucial to this discussion is the impact ideals of race, gender, and nation had on policy-making structures and how events in Palestine, India, Kenya, Ireland and Europe influenced the Declaration‘s formation, issuance, and outcomes. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1. AN INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 A Historiographic Overview ...........................................................................................6 2. CONTEST FOR NATION .....................................................................................................15 Nationalism in Nineteenth Century Rhetoric ................................................................15 Jewish Zionism .............................................................................................................19 Traditional Zionism: Cultural, Economic, and Philanthropic ................................20 Political Zionism ....................................................................................................26 Christian Zionism ..........................................................................................................32 Christian Zionism as a Political Tool.....................................................................40 Nationalism in the Muslim World.................................................................................44 Nationalism in India ...............................................................................................48 Arab Nationalism ...................................................................................................57 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................63 3. THE QUESTION OF RACE AND THE ‗RIGHT TO RULE‘ .............................................65 Muscular Christianity and the Imperial Process ...........................................................67 The Modammedan Question .........................................................................................73 Islam‘s Place in European Imagination .................................................................75 The Arab Case: Quasi-Barbarians and Very Old Children ...........................................84 vii The Indian Colonialist and the Racial Politics of Empire .............................................92 The Great Rebellion ...............................................................................................93 The Ilbert Bill: Race and Gender Formalized in Policy ........................................95 Race and Indian Imperial Rights Overseas ............................................................98 The Jewish Case: The Re-Masculinization of Judaism...............................................106 Muscular Judaism as an Extension of Muscular Christianity ..............................123 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................127 4. PERSONALITY AND THE INDIVIDUAL .......................................................................129 The Power of the Pen: Writers and the Question of Zionism .....................................130 The Journalist and Editors ...................................................................................131 The Novelist .........................................................................................................139
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University College London Purim Newsletter 2011
    University College London Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies Purim Newsletter 2011 Hebrew and Jewish Studies Congratulations… To Dr. Lily Kahn who has been appointed to a permanent Lectureship in the Department. To Prof. Sacha Stern who has been awarded a British Academy Small Research Grant for the project entitled 'Jewish Calendar Controversies in the 10th -11th Centuries Near East: A Historical and Codicological Analysis'. To Prof. Mark Geller who has been awarded a two-year Wellcome Trust Grant which will provide a Medical History and Humanities fellowship for Dr. Ulrike Steinert for her study entitled ‘Gynaecology in the Medical Texts of An- cient Mesopotamia from the 1st Millennium BC’. To undergraduate Joshua Mirwis and his wife, Eli, on the birth of their daughter, Layla Amélie. To undergraduate Genc Sejko on the birth of his baby girl. To Dr. Alinda Damsma on the occasion of her forthcoming wedding to Dr. Nader Saffari (Reader in Ultrasonics, UCL Mechanical Engineering) To the 2010/11 awardees of the Ian Karten Charitable Scholarship: Yonatan Birnbaum (MA Language, Culture and History: Hebrew and Jewish Studies) Jan Henning (MA Language, Culture and History: Holocaust Studies) Aneta Horniak (MA Language, Culture and History: Hebrew and Jewish Studies) Ari Lamm (MA Language, Culture and History: Hebrew and Jewish Studies) Contents 2 “IMPACT” Again Ada Rapoport-Albert 4 Seeing with Two Pairs of Eyes Lindsey Taylor-Guthartz 8 African-American Travels Vanessa Freedman 11 The Adath Yisrael Cemetery Stephen Gabriel Rosenberg 13
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003
    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the RAXEN Information Network Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the EUMC - RAXEN Information Network EUMC - Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 2 EUMC – Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Foreword Following concerns from many quarters over what seemed to be a serious increase in acts of antisemitism in some parts of Europe, especially in March/April 2002, the EUMC asked the 15 National Focal Points of its Racism and Xenophobia Network (RAXEN) to direct a special focus on antisemitism in its data collection activities. This comprehensive report is one of the outcomes of that initiative. It represents the first time in the EU that data on antisemitism has been collected systematically, using common guidelines for each Member State. The national reports delivered by the RAXEN network provide an overview of incidents of antisemitism, the political, academic and media reactions to it, information from public opinion polls and attitude surveys, and examples of good practice to combat antisemitism, from information available in the years 2002 – 2003. On receipt of these national reports, the EUMC then asked an independent scholar, Dr Alexander Pollak, to make an evaluation of the quality and availability of this data on antisemitism in each country, and identify problem areas and gaps. The country-by-country information provided by the 15 National Focal Points, and the analysis by Dr Pollak, form Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of this report respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Öffentliche Und Fachöffentliche Diskurse Über Nachrichtendienste in Großbritannien 1900 – 1939
    „Probably the Finest Organisation of its Kind“. Öffentliche und fachöffentliche Diskurse über Nachrichtendienste in Großbritannien 1900 – 1939. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam von Michael Rupp, M.A. Potsdam 2018 Erstbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Sönke Neitzel Online veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der Universität Potsdam: https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42985 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-429851 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung...............................................................................................................5 1.1 Thema und Fragestellung...............................................................................5 1.2 Forschungsstand..........................................................................................10 1.3 Methodische Grundlagen..............................................................................17 1.4 Quellenkorpus...............................................................................................24 1.4.1 Fachöffentliche Quellen ........................................................................24 1.4.2 Öffentliche Quellen................................................................................28 2. Vorkriegszeit und Erster Weltkrieg (1900 – 1918)..............................................36 2.1 Institutionen- und ereignisgeschichtlicher Rahmen – Die Entwicklung der britischen „intelligence community“ bis 1918......................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • A2 Revision Guide British Empire 1914-1967 India
    A2 Revision Guide British Empire 1914-1967 India 1906 All Muslim League founded- originally cooperated with Congress 1909 expressed belief in home rule, ‘Hind Swaraj’- favoured peaceful resistance based on satyagraha- insistence on the truth- rejecting violence to combat evil- appeal to moral conscience through strikes (hartals) and swadeshi (boycotts) Gandhi rejected caste system particularly against untouchables Wanted independent India- remain agricultural and rural and reject western industrialisation/ urbanisation Offered benefits of Western democracy/ liberalism whilst keeping Indian tradition. Non-violent methods were difficult for British- hit them economically and they couldn’t use violent oppression as it seemed disproportionate to methods used. Gandhi began career in S. Africa- campaigned against racism and segregation and challenged GB and Afrikaners from 1910 (dominant group after unification- descendants of Boers) 1913 Muhammad Ali Jinnah takes over Muslim League- originally favoured Hindu- Muslim co-op Approx. 1/3 of troops in Fr. In 1914 were Indian or GB soldiers who had served in India. Indian troops- major contributions to fight Middle East, and Africa (record less successful than Dominions). 1914 2/3 India’s imports came from GB but this began to fall- wartime disruption. India as capture domestic market more. After war desperate for £ to help control against nationalists GB put high taxes on Indian imports- 1917 11% to 1931 25%- protected Indian industry against competitors so there was growth. 1915 Gandhi returned to India, became President of Indian National Congress GB imports from India reduced from 7.3% to 6.1% 1925-29 but rose to 6.5% 1934-8. GB exports to India also reduced 11.9% 1909-13 to 8% 1934-8.
    [Show full text]
  • Exporting Zionism
    Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Ayala Levin All rights reserved ABSTRACT Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin This dissertation explores Israeli architectural and construction aid in the 1960s – “the African decade” – when the majority of sub-Saharan African states gained independence from colonial rule. In the Cold War competition over development, Israel distinguished its aid by alleging a postcolonial status, similar geography, and a shared history of racial oppression to alleviate fears of neocolonial infiltration. I critically examine how Israel presented itself as a model for rapid development more applicable to African states than the West, and how the architects negotiated their professional practice in relation to the Israeli Foreign Ministry agendas, the African commissioners' expectations, and the international disciplinary discourse on modern architecture. I argue that while architectural modernism was promoted in the West as the International Style, Israeli architects translated it to the African context by imbuing it with nation-building qualities such as national cohesion, labor mobilization, skill acquisition and population dispersal. Based on their labor-Zionism settler-colonial experience,
    [Show full text]
  • National Identity Formation in Britain's Dominions and India William S
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 5-2011 Independent Personality: National Identity Formation in Britain's Dominions and India William S. Miller [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Miller, William S., "Independent Personality: National Identity Formation in Britain's Dominions and India" (2011). Research Papers. Paper 93. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDEPENDENT PERSONALITY: NATIONAL IDENTITY FORMATION IN BRITAIN’S DOMINIONS AND INDIA by William S. Miller B.A., Illinois Wesleyan University, 2009 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts. Department of History in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2011 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL “INDEPENDENT PERSONALITY: NATIONAL IDENTITY FORMATION IN BRITAIN’S DOMINIONS AND INDIA” By William S. Miller A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the field of History Approved by: Dr. Ras Michael Brown Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale April 15, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE SECTIONS Introduction ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No. 290 Constructing National Identity: the Muscular Jew Vs the Palestinian Underdog James M. Dorsey S. Rajaratnam School Of
    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed in this publication are entirely those of the author(s), and do not represent the official position of RSIS. This publication may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior written permission obtained from RSIS and due credit given to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email [email protected] for further editorial queries. NO. 290 CONSTRUCTING NATIONAL IDENTITY: THE MUSCULAR JEW VS THE PALESTINIAN UNDERDOG JAMES M. DORSEY S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES SINGAPORE 9 APRIL 2015 About the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous school within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS’ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific. To accomplish this mission, it will: Provide a rigorous professional graduate education with a strong practical emphasis Conduct policy-relevant research in defence, national security, international relations, strategic studies and diplomacy Foster a global network of like-minded professional schools Graduate Programmes RSIS offers a challenging graduate education in international affairs, taught by an international faculty of leading thinkers and practitioners. The Master of Science degree programmes in Strategic Studies, International Relations, Asian Studies, and International Political Economy are distinguished by their focus on the Asia Pacific, the professional practice of international affairs, and the cultivation of academic depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Klug What Do We Mean When We Say 'Antisemitsm'?
    Brian Klug What Do We Mean When We Say ‘Antisemitsm’? Echoes of shattering glass Proceedings / International conference “Antisemitism in Europe Today: the Phenomena, the Conflicts” 8–9 November 2013 Organized by the Jewish Museum Berlin, the Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” and the Center for Research on Antisemitism Berlin BRIAN KLUG What Do We Mean When We Say ‘Antisemitism’? 1 Brian Klug What Do We Mean When We Say ‘Antisemitism’? Echoes of shattering glass Guten abend. Let me begin by apologizing for the fact that those might be the only words in German that you hear from me this evening. I really have no excuse. I learned German – twice: once at the University of Vienna and again at the University of Chicago. And I forgot it – twice. Which goes to show that Klug by name does not necessarily mean Klug by nature. I grew up in London. My parents spoke Yiddish at home, which should have given me a solid foundation for speaking German. But, like many Jewish parents of their generation, they did so in order not to be understood by the children. And they succeeded. So, thank you, in advance, for listening. Let me also express my thanks to my hosts for their invitation, especially for inviting me to speak here and now: here, in Berlin, at the Jewish Museum, an institution that I admire immensely, and now, on the eve of the 75th anniversary of Pogromnacht, which took place across Nazi Germany and Austria on 9 November 1938. (In Britain, we still say ‘Kristallnacht’. I know and I respect the reasons why this word has been retired in Germany, and in my lecture tonight I shall use the name Pogromnacht.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 (63) Feb.Pdf
    The Spire Sentinel The Newsletter & Magazine of The Chesterfield Branch of The Western Front Association ISSUE 63 – March 2021 Our aims are 'Remembrance and Sharing the History of the Great War'. - 1 - Issue 63 – list of contents 2 – 3 Contents Page + Branch Virtual Meeting details + WFA Webinars 4 Secretary`s Scribbles 5 - 6 Garrison Library 7 - 12 Branded Goods 12 – 13 Book Reviews by Rob Nash th 14 – 28 Virtual meeting 27 January with Stuart Hadaway 29 Project Alias – The Results 20 – 68 The Illusory Threat – Part 7 Our next joint `on line` meeting, jointly with Lincoln Branch will be held on Wednesday, March 24th at 7.00pm. Our own Branch chair, Tony Bolton will be giving this talk. Tony has been a member of the WFA since 1984. After retiring from a senior position in the construction industry he completed his Master’s Degree at Birmingham in 2014 with Distinction. A founder member of the Chesterfield Branch he became its Chairman following his MA. He joined the WFA national Executive Committee in 2018 becoming Chair last year. His interests lie in the political direction of the war, the inter-relation of the different theatres of the war and in the campaign in Mespot. The registration link is hereunder….. https://my.demio.com/ref/sTs3L2VM4VAuF9Z7 The title of Tony`s talk is From 'Business as Usual' to 'Just getting it done' the evolution of British war strategy News of the WFA webinars in March 2021 - Monday 8 March sees Andrew Tatham talking about ‘A Group Photograph’ As well as being the story of the 8th Battalion, Royal Berkshire Regiment, and their involvement in the Battles of Loos and the Somme, this talk tells a story full of family history investigations and human interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine
    Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine Jewish Statehood and the History of the Middle East Conflict First edition published by Ferdinand Schöningh GmbH & Co. KG in 2012: Das zionistische Israel. Jüdischer Nationalismus und die Geschichte des Nahostkonflikts An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-049663-5 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-049880-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-049564-5 ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISSN 0179-3256 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, © 2017 Tamar Amar-Dahl, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • IMAGINING INDEPENDENCE PARK by Oren Segal a Dissertation
    IMAGINING INDEPENDENCE PARK by Oren Segal A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) In the University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Shachar M Pinsker, Chair Professor David M. Halperin Associate Professor Carol Bardenstein Assistant Professor Maya Barzilai “Doing it in the park, Doing it after Dark, oh, yeah” The Blackbyrds, “Rock Creek Park,” City Life (Fantasy Records, 1975) © Oren Segal All rights reserved 2012 In memory of Nir Katz and Liz Troubishi ii Acknowledgements Most of all, I would like to thank my committee members: Shachar Pinsker, David Halperin, Carol Bardenstein, and Maya Barzilai. They are more than teachers to me, but mentors whose kindness and wisdom will guide me wherever I go. I feel fortunate to have them in my life. I would also like to thank other professors, members of the Jean and Samuel Frankel Center for Judaic Studies at the University of Michigan, who were and are part of my academic and personal live: Anita Norich, Deborah Dash Moore, Julian Levinson, Mikhail Krutikov, and Ruth Tsoffar. I also wish to thank my friends and graduate student colleagues who took part in the Frankel Center’s Reading Group: David Schlitt, Ronit Stahl, Nicholas Block, Daniel Mintz, Jessica Evans, Sonia Isard, Katie Rosenblatt, and especially Benjamin Pollack. I am grateful for funding received from the Frankel Center throughout my six years in Ann Arbor; without the center’s support, this study would have not been possible. I would also like to thank the center’s staff for their help.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India
    Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India Stephen Legg School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham NG72RD [email protected] Abstract The 1919 Government of India Act instituted sweeping constitutional reforms that were inspired by the concept of “dyarchy”. This innovation in constitutional history devolved powers to the provinces and then divided these roles of government into reserved and transferred subjects, the latter of which would be administered by elected Indian ministers. Recent scholarship has been reassessing the local biopolitical potential unleashed by the 1919 Act. In this paper I revisit dyarchy at the national scale to show how this “All-India” re- visioning of Indian sovereignty was actually negotiated in relation to its imperial and international outsides and the exigencies of retaining governmental control inside the provinces. This paper will propose a constitutional historical geography of dyarchy, focusing on three scales and the forms of comparison they allow. First, Lionel Curtis’s political geometries and the international genealogies of his federalist aspirations are explored. Secondly, the partially democratic level of the province is shown to have been rigorously penetrated by, and categorically subordinated to, the central tier of colonial autocracy, which orchestrated a political geography of exclusion and exception. Finally, rival conceptions of time and sequentiality will be used to examine the basis for nationalist criticisms and exploitations of dyarchy’s reconfigurations of democracy, biopolitics, and the vital mass of the people. 1 Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India1 “The myriad problems of India must be and can be solved only by the Indians in India.
    [Show full text]