DOCSLIB.ORG

The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California Erin Christine Falvey Claremont Graduate University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California Erin Christine Falvey Claremont Graduate University Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Theses & Dissertations CGU Student Scholarship 2011 The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California Erin Christine Falvey Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Falvey, Erin Christine, "The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California" (2011). CGU Theses & Dissertations. Paper 14. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/14 DOI: 10.5642/cguetd/14 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California By Erin C. Falvey A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Claremont Graduate University and San Diego State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Faculties of Education Claremont, California San Diego, California 2011 Approved by the Dissertation Chairs Dr. Philip Dreyer Dr. Karen Cadiero-Kaplan Claremont Graduate University San Diego State University Copyright Erin C. Falvey, 2011 All Rights Reserved. APPROVAL OF THE DISSERTATION COMMITTEE This dissertation has been duly read, reviewed, and critiqued by the Committee listed below, which hereby approves the manuscript of Erin C. Falvey as fulfilling the scope and quality requirements for meriting the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Faculties of Education. Dr. Karen Cadiero-Kaplan, Co-Chair San Diego State University Professor and Department Chair Policy Studies in Language and Cross Cultural Education Dr. Philip Dreyer, Co-Chair Claremont Graduate University Professor School of Educational Studies Dr. Rafaela Santa Cruz, Member San Diego State University Director of the SDSU/CGU Joint Ph.D. Program in Education School of Teacher Education Dr. Robert Dawidoff, Member Claremont Graduate University Professor and Department Chair School of Arts and Humanities-History Abstract The Experiences of Legally Married Same-Sex Couples in California by Erin C. Falvey Claremont Graduate University and San Diego State University: 2011 With the aim of increasing practitioner competence, this dissertation provides marriage and family therapists and mental health service providers with insight into the experiences of legally married same-sex couples. Specifically, the inquiry’s objective was to elicit narratives of strength and agency from these couples who navigated the oppressive circumstances of an anti-gay amendment campaign situated within the debate over the extension of marriage rights to same-sex couples. Fourteen couples were interviewed in order to respond to the dissertation’s overriding question: How do the lesbian and gay couples and families who are among those who were legally married in California before the passage of Proposition 8 narrate their experiences of their marriages? Through portraiture (Lawrence-Lightfoot & Davis, 1997), a method of inquiry situated within a postmodern, social constructionist framework, a narrative was produced which evolved through five emergent themes: 1) Our Commitments Have Rich Histories—the symbolic and legal ways in which these couples commemorated and brought definition to their commitments, in the absence of a nationally-sanctioned and collectively-recognized state of legal marriage; 2) Not a Simple Matter: The Complexities of Language Choice—their contextual language choices, which reflected the absence of representative and collectively-recognized language options for their relationships after their legal marriages; 3) The Battle Metaphor—the couples’ experiences of California’s political debate over the extension of marriage rights to same-sex couples; 4) Support Shaped Lived Experiences—the impact of support from friends, family, and community; and lastly, 5) Legal Marriage Shaped Individual, Relational, and Social Identities— individual, relational and social shifts that occurred for the couples through the experience of being legally married. A follow-up focus group further validated the theme Support Shaped Lived Experiences, and examined more deeply the tensions that occurred when important persons were silent about and/or did not recognize the legitimacy of the couples' legal marriages, and/or the discriminatory context in which their legal marriages were situated. In addition to its contribution of the experiences of legally married same- sex couples to the family therapy literature, the dissertation concludes with important implications for affirmative therapeutic practice, research, education, training, advocacy, and social policy. DEDICATION In memory of my father, Coach Falvey. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of an eight-year journey. I want to acknowledge the many people who were instrumental in its creation and influential to me along the way. First, and foremost, I would like to thank my partner Deyna, whose unwavering support was an incredible asset both emotionally and practically through the process of this dissertation. I am so thankful to her and to her family for all that they have done. Deyna, I deeply appreciate your presence in my life. To my oldest and dearest friends, Leslie, Mailee, and Katinka, your support and love over nearly the last two decades has had a profound impact on my life. My sincerest appreciation also goes to my friends and colleagues Jessica and Jennine who have stuck by me and supported me through the ups and downs I’ve encountered during our friendships and particularly throughout the course of my studies and this dissertation. Thanks to my family, who supported and encouraged my studies from the outset. Particular thanks go to my mother for her support of both my personal and professional endeavors, and to my sister Lauren who was always willing to review a draft or lend her thoughts on my work. I am also grateful to my Aunt Barb, whose enthusiasm for the project as she contributed to its editing helped me to see it through. I really loved having the opportunity to work with her. I would also like to acknowledge those who have mentored me along the way, especially Jan, Karen, and Lourdes. Their guidance and support have been tremendously meaningful to me. I’m grateful to my committee members who all lent their insight and expertise to the creation of this dissertation, particularly Karen whose unwavering support and willingness to navigate this process with me contributed so heavily to this vii project's completion. I include here, too, a thank you from all of the students in the Joint Doc program who benefitted from Ceci’s assistance and care. Ceci, you were so incredibly helpful to me as I navigated my program of study. I would also like to thank San Diego's LGBT/Hillcrest community, who helped me spread the word about this project. Their kind support and recognition of the importance of this dissertation kept me energized from its outset to its completion. Finally, I would like to thank the 14 couples who participated in the study. I am deeply appreciative of the time we spent together. Your words are so powerful, and I can only hope that I have done them justice. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………….. vii Chapter I. ORIENTATION ………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………….. 1 Objective of the Dissertation ……………………………………………… 2 Political Context of the Dissertation ……………………………………… 3 Personal Context of the Dissertation ……………………………………… 5 Social Context of the Dissertation ………………………………………… 8 Rationale and Purpose of the Dissertation ………………………………… 16 Audience of the Dissertation …………………………………………….... 18 Definition of Relevant Terms ……………………………………………... 19 Organization of the Dissertation ………………………………………...... 22 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………………………………… 23 Introduction ……………………………………………………………….. 23 The Extension of Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples: Key Historical Precedents ……………………………………………………… 24 Marriage Rights and the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement ……. 25 Timeline of the Legal and Political Battles for the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples ………………………………... 28 The Extension of Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples in California ……………………………………………………….. 34 The Effects of Stigma and Discrimination on the Mental Heath and Well-being of Lesbians and Gay Men ………………………………... 40 The Social Effects of Discriminatory Politics and Legal Battles …. 41 The Effects of Discriminatory Politics and Legal Battles on the Mental Health and Well-being of Lesbians and Gay Men ………... 43 ix Chapter Page II. (continued) Stress Factors for Lesbians and Gay Men in the Context of Discriminatory Politics and Legal Battles ………………………… 44 The Resilience Strategies of Lesbians and Gay Men in the Context of Discriminatory Politics and Legal Battles …………….. 48 The Relationship between Marriage and Mental Health ………………….. 52 The Effects of Legal Recognition on the Experiences of Same-Sex Couples in Legally Recognized Relationships ………… 54 Summary and Conclusions ………………………………………………... 63 III. METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………………………. 66 Introduction ……………………………………………………………….. 66 Theoretical and Philosophical Framework Guiding Methodological Decisions 67 I. Theoretical Frame: Philosophical Orientation …………………... 68 II. Methodology Frame: Research Approach ……………………... 68 III. Inquiry Processes ……………………………………………… 69 IV: Data Analysis and Reporting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Broken Bargain: Full Report
    A BROKEN BARGAIN Discrimination, Fewer Bene!ts and More Taxes for LGBT Workers Full Report June 2013 National Center for TRANSGENDER EQUALITY With a foreword by Authors Partners This report was authored by: This report was developed in partnership with: 2 Movement Advancement Project Freedom to Work The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an Freedom to Work is a national organization dedicated independent think tank that provides rigorous research, to the notion that all Americans deserve the freedom insight and analysis that help speed equality for LGBT to build a successful career without fear of harassment people. MAP works collaboratively with LGBT organizations, or discrimination because of their sexual orientation advocates and funders, providing information, analysis and or gender identity. For more information, visit resources that help coordinate and strengthen their e!orts www.freedomtowork.org. for maximum impact. MAP also conducts policy research to inform the public and policymakers about the legal and National Partnership for Women & Families policy needs of LGBT people and their families. For more The National Partnership for Women & Families works to information, visit www.lgbtmap.org. promote fairness in the workplace, reproductive health and rights, access to quality a!ordable health care, Center for American Progress and policies that help women and men meet the dual The Center for American Progress (CAP) is a think tank demands of work and family. For more information, visit dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through www.nationalpartnership.org. ideas and action. CAP combines bold policy ideas with a modern communications platform to help shape the National Center for Transgender Equality national debate.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 July 27, 2011 Dear Senator: RE: ACLU Urges Support and Co
    WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE July 27, 2011 Dear Senator: RE: ACLU Urges Support and Co-Sponsorship of the Respect for Marriage Act (S. 598) On behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a non-partisan organization with more than a half million members, countless additional AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION activists and supporters, and fifty-three affiliates nationwide, we are writing WASHINGTON to urge you to support and co-sponsor the Respect for Marriage Act (S. 598). LEGISLATIVE OFFICE TH 915 15th STREET, NW, 6 FL WASHINGTON, DC 20005 T/202.544.1681 The Respect for Marriage Act, which was introduced earlier this year by F/202.546.0738 WWW.ACLU.ORG Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), would repeal the discriminatory, so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in its entirety, as well as provide all LAURA W. MURPHY DIRECTOR married couples certainty that regardless of where they travel or move in the NATIONAL OFFICE country, they will not be treated as strangers under federal law. The Respect 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FL. NEW YORK, NY 10004-2400 for Marriage Act would return the federal government to its historic role in T/212.549.2500 deferring to states in determining who is married. OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS SUSAN N. HERMAN PRESIDENT When DOMA (Public Law 104-199) was passed by Congress and signed ANTHONY D. ROMERO into law in 1996, gay and lesbian couples could not legally marry in any EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR state, and it was not until 2000 that Vermont made national headlines with ROBERT REMAR its civil unions law. Today, gay and lesbian couples can legally marry in six TREASURER states – Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont – as well as in the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding, Democracy, and the Constitution
    Wardle 5.0 10/15/2010 10:14 AM SECTION THREE OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: DECIDING, DEMOCRACY, AND THE CONSTITUTION Lynn D. Wardle TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction: DOMA and Self-Government .................................... 952 II. Five Dimensions of the Controversy Over DOMA .......................... 954 III. The Politics of DOMA ......................................................................... 959 A. The Legislative and Popular Politics of DOMA .......................... 960 B. The Academic Politics of DOMA ................................................. 964 C. The Judicial Politics of DOMA Litigation ................................... 965 IV. The Constitutionality of DOMA Section Three Under Structural Federalism and Separation of Powers Principles .............................. 973 A. Section Three and Federalism Doctrine ....................................... 974 B. A Short Primer on the History of Federal Regulation of the Meaning and Incidents of Family Relations for Purposes of Federal Law ...................................................................................... 976 C. Federalism Self-Contradictions by Opponents of Section Three of DOMA .............................................................................. 982 V. Popular Sovereignty, Constitutional Consensus, and Same-Sex Marriage Recognition ........................................................................... 985 A. Popular Sovereignty and Institutional Re-Constitution ............. 986 B. Constitutional Consensus and Same-Sex Marriage
    [Show full text]
  • Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Joanna L
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2012 Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Joanna L. Grossman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Joanna L. Grossman, Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 155 (2012) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. C ARDOZO L AW R EVIEW de•novo DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, WILL YOU PLEASE GO NOW! JOANNA L. GROSSMAN* The time has come. The time has come. The time is now. Just go. Go. GO! I don’t care how. You can go by foot. You can go by cow. Marvin K. Mooney, will you please go now! INTRODUCTION These are the opening lines of Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now!, a Dr. Seuss book that my three sons and I have read literally hundreds of times. It has all the usual appeal of a Dr. Seuss book – euphonious rhymes, made-up words and objects, fantastical creatures. But it has something else, too. An air of mystery. The entire book revolves around trying to get rid of Marvin K.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKING the BALANCES: an Examination of Separation of Powers Issues Raised by the Windsor Case Derek Funk*
    CHECKING THE BALANCES: An Examination of Separation of Powers Issues Raised by the Windsor Case Derek Funk* INTRODUCTION The legal definition of marriage is currently a prominent issue in political debates and courtrooms across the nation. Up until the late 1990s, state and federal law universally defined marriage as between a man and a woman.1 The push for recognition of same-sex marriages began to gain momentum in 2000, when Vermont became the first state in the U.S. to legalize same-sex civil unions and registered partnerships.2 In the next few years, several other states across the nation changed their definitions of marriage to include same- sex couples.3 Nevertheless, the federal definition of marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), enacted in 1996, continued to define marriage as meaning only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife.4 As more and more states changed their definitions of marriage, same-sex marriage advocates criticized the federal definition of marriage, arguing it *. J.D. Candidate, 2015, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. 1. See Marriage, GALLUP.COM, http://www.gallup.com/poll/117328/marriage.aspx (last visited Dec. 20, 2014). 2. See Timeline: Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement, PBS.ORG, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/timeline/stonewall/ (last visited Oct. 28, 2014); Gay Marriage Timeline: History of the Same-sex Marriage Debate, PROCON.ORG, http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000030 (last visited Oct. 28, 2014); History and Timeline of the Freedom to Marry in the United States, FREEDOMTOMARRY.ORG, http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/history-and-timeline-of- marriage (last visited Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense of Marriage Act: Dedicated to Articulating and Advancing a Family- Centered Philosophy of Public Life
    Founded in 1983, Family Research Council is a nonprofit research and educational organization The Defense of Marriage Act: dedicated to articulating and advancing a family- centered philosophy of public life. In addition to What It Does and Why It Is Vital providing policy research and analysis for the for Traditional Marriage in America legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government, FRC seeks to inform the news media, the academic community, business leaders, and the general public about family issues that affect the nation. Family Research Council relies solely on the generosity of individuals, families, foundations, and businesses for financial support. The Internal Revenue Service recognizes FRC as a tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) charitable organization. Donations to FRC are therefore tax-deductible in accordance with Section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code. To see other FRC publications and to find out more about FRC’s work, visit www.frc.org. , BC10D01 family research council , order line -- Washington, DC .. frc The Defense of Marriage Act: What It Does and Why It Is Vital Thank you for choosing this for Traditional Marriage in America resource. Our pamphlets are designed for grassroots activ- by christopher m. gacek, j.d., ph.d. ists and concerned citizens—in other words, people who want to make a difference in their families, in their com- Introduction munities, and in their culture. The federal Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law in September 1996, is a vital element in History has clearly shown the influence that the preserving traditional marriage in America for “Values Voter” can have in the political process.
    [Show full text]
  • US Immigration
    BUSHELL (DO NOT DELETE) 5/29/2013 2:45 PM “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses”—Just as Long as They Fit the Heteronormative Ideal: U.S. Immigration Law’s Exclusionary & Inequitable Treatment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Queer Migrants Logan Bushell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 674 II. IMMIGRATION & SEXUALITY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATING SEXUALITY AT THE BORDER .......................................... 677 A. 1875-1917: Establishing a Foundational Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants .................................................... 678 B. 1917-1990: Adherence to the Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants ......................................................................... 680 III. REFUGE IN THE COURTHOUSE? THE JUDICIARY’S APPROACH TO EXCLUSIONARY IMMIGRATION LAWS & POLICIES .............................. 683 A. Boutilier v. INS: Not Welcome—The Judiciary’s Sanctioning of Exclusionary Immigration Laws & Policies ............................ 683 B. Hill v. INS: An Inclusionary Olive Branch from the Judiciary ... 685 IV. TWO STEPS FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: PROGRESSIVE MEASURES PROVE MERELY PRETEXTUAL ........................................... 687 A. No Longer Categorically Excluded, but Certainly Not Included: Dismissing LGBTQ Persons from Family Unification ................................................................................... 687 B. Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding Exactly Who
    [Show full text]
  • Amending the Defense of Marriage Act: a Necessary Step Toward Gaining Full Legal Rights for Same-Sex Couples Nancy Kubasek
    Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law Volume 19 | Issue 3 Article 8 2011 Amending the Defense of Marriage Act: A Necessary Step Toward Gaining Full Legal Rights for Same-Sex Couples Nancy Kubasek Christy Glass Kate Cook Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/jgspl Part of the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kubasek, Nancy, Christy Glass, and Kate Cook. "Amending the Defense of Marriage Act: A Necessary Step Toward Gaining Full Legal Rights for Same-Sex Couples." American University Journal of Gender Social Policy and Law 19, no. 3 (2011): 959-986. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KUBASEK 4/30/11 9/1/2011 6:28 PM Kubasek et al.: Amending the Defense of Marriage Act: A Necessary Step Toward Gai AMENDING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: A NECESSARY STEP TOWARD GAINING FULL LEGAL RIGHTS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES NANCY KUBASEK, CHRISTY GLASS, AND KATE COOK I. Introduction ............................................................................................ 959 II. History of the Treatment of Same-Sex Relationships in the United States ............................................................................................... 962 III. Losses Imposed on Same-Sex Couples by Federal DOMA ................ 965 A. Federal Welfare Benefits .......................................................... 968 B. Tax Benefits .............................................................................. 969 C. Additional Benefits ................................................................... 970 IV. Alternative Approaches to Remedying the Problem ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • RMA Main Position Paper
    The Respect for Marriage Act of 2011 HR 1116 and S 598 The Respect for Marriage Act repeals the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” and returns the federal government to its constitutional and common-sense practice of honoring the lawful marriages celebrated in the states. The Respect for Marriage Act provides clarity and security to families, businesses and others dealing with them, and the government itself. The Defense of Marriage Act The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unfairly denies married same-sex couples the 1,138+ federal protections and responsibilities triggered by marriage. This discrimination directly burdens tens of thousands of lawfully married same-sex couples in the United States, as well as businesses, employees, and others who deal with these families. DOMA intrudes the federal government into the interstate question of how to deal with valid out- of-state marriages, and carves all married same-sex couples out of all federal statutes, regulations, and programs otherwise applicable to other married people. Currently, same-sex couples share the freedom to marry in six states (Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont) and the District of Columbia. It is estimated that there are now as many as 100,000 legally married same-sex couples in this country. Because of DOMA, these couples are denied the federal protections afforded other legally married couples. These include: • Sharing Social Security benefits with a spouse • Sponsoring a spouse for a green card or citizenship • Filing joint federal tax returns • Receiving the protections spouses are entitled to under the federal estate tax • Access to family and medical leave DOMA complicates marriage, creating a patchwork of confusion where married couples must file state and local taxes differently and are uncertain of their rights and responsibilities, and burdening businesses and others interacting with the couples and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for Equality: a Transgender Federal Agenda for the Next Presidential Administration and Congress
    Blueprint for Equality: A Transgender Federal Agenda for the Next Presidential Administration and Congress OCTOBER 2016 National Center for TRANSGENDER EQUALITY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY .................................................................................................................................5 HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS .................................................................................................................... 10 SAFE AND SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS ................................................................................................................14 ACCESS TO QUALITY HEALTH CARE ............................................................................................................. 19 FIGHTING HIV/AIDS .............................................................................................................................................24 REFORMING POLICE AND ENDING ANTI-TRANSGENDER VIOLENCE .................................................27 IMPROVING THE LIVES OF TRANS OLDER ADULTS ...................................................................................31 COUNTING TRANS PEOPLE IN FEDERAL SURVEYS ..................................................................................34 ID DOCUMENTS AND PRIVACY........................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Announced the President's Support
    ~p S'jl ~,,<\y *...• ··l**Jf-..•.~~~ ~ en Judiciary Committee News United States Senate * Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman • ** ~l;]NA~~ From the Committee Office of Chairman Patrick Leahy (D- Vt.) Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing On: "S. 598, The Respect for Marriage Act: Assessing the Impact of DOMA on American Families" July 20,2011 On the White House Announcement Of Support for the Respect for Marriage Act • Excerpt of Transcript of White House Press Briefing, July 19, 2011 • Comment of Senator Patrick Leahy • Statement of Center for American Progress Action Fund • Statement from the Human Rights Campaign White House Announces President’s Support For Respect For Marriage Act THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ___________________________________________________________ For Immediate Release July 19, 2011 PRESS BRIEFING BY PRESS SECRETARY JAY CARNEY James S. Brady Press Briefing Room ***** Q Yes, the President has said in the past that he opposes the Defense of Marriage Act, but he is yet to endorse the Respect for Marriage Act, which is the specific piece of legislation -- MR. CARNEY: With Senator Feinstein? Q -- aimed to repeal the bill. Tomorrow, the Senate will hold the first hearing into that bill. Is the administration ready to endorse that bill? MR. CARNEY: I can tell you that the President has long called for a legislative repeal of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, which continues to have a real impact on the lives of real people -- our families, friends and neighbors. He is proud to support the Respect for Marriage Act, introduced by Senator Feinstein and Congressman Nadler, which would take DOMA off the books once and for all.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    Nos. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, V. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit BRIEF OF 167 MEMBERS OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND 44 U.S. SENATORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS HEATHER C. SAW YER JOSEPH F. TRINGALI House Committee on Counsel of Record the Judiciary JOSHUA C. POLSTER Minority Counsel to ELISA Y. LEE Ranking Members AIDAN T. GRANO John Conyers, Jr. Simpson Thacher and Jerrold Nadler & Bartlett LLP B-336 Rayburn Bldg. 425 Lexington Avenue Washington, DC 20515 New York, NY 10017 (202) 225-6906 (212) 455-2000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae 258055 A (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859 A complete list of the 167 Members of the House of Representatives and 44 U.S. Senators participating as amici is provided in an appendix to this brief. Among them are: NANCY PELOSI HARRY REID House Democratic Leader Senate Democratic Leader REP. JERROLD NADLER SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN Lead Sponsors, Respect for Marriage Act STENY H. HOYER RICHARD J. DURBIN House Democratic Whip Senate Assistant Democratic Leader JAMES E. CLYBURN CHARLES E. SCHUMER House Assistant Vice Chair, Senate Democratic Leader Democratic Conference PATTY MURRAY Secretary, Senate Democratic Conference JOHN CONYERS, JR. PATRICK LEAHY Ranking Member, House Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary Senate Committee on the Judiciary JARED POLIS, DAVID N. CICILLINE, SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, MARK POCAN, KYRSTEN SINEMA, and MARK TAKANO House LGBT Equality Caucus Co-Chairs i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS.
    [Show full text]