Akers Chart for Heirs in Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

AKERS CHART Never FOR Potential Heirs HEIRS IN TENNESSEE Heirs P1 = Paternal Grandfather M1 = Maternal Grandfather P2 = Paternal Grandmother M2 = Maternal Grandmother P = Father M = Mother PU = Paternal Uncle MU = Maternal Uncle Paternal Line PA = Pa ternal Aunt MA = Maternal Aunt Maternal Line P1C = Paternal First Cousin M1C = Maternal First Cousin P1C1 = Paternal First Cousin 1x Removed M1C1 = Maternal First Cousin 1x Removed P1C2 = Paternal First Cousin 2x Removed M1C2 = Maternal First Cousin 2x Removed P1C3 = Paternal First Cousin 3x Removed M1C3 = Maternal First Cousin 3x Removed D = Decedent S = Spouse B/S = Brother/Sister Great DS1 = Decedent’s Son Ne = Nephew Great DD1 = Decedent’s Daughter Ni = Niece Grandparents DS2 = Decedent’s Grandson Ne1 = Grand Nephew Grandparents DD2 = Decedent’s Granddaughter Ni1 = Grand Niece DS3 = Decedent’s Great Grandson Ne2 = Great Grand Nephew DD3 = Decedent’s Great Granddaughter Ni2 = Great Grand Niece Grand Grandmother Grandfather Grandfather Grandmother Grand Uncle/Aunt Uncle/Aunt P2 P1 M1 M2 First Cousin Uncle/Aunt Father Mother Uncle/Aunt First Cousin 1x Removed 1x Removed PU/PA P M MU/MA Second Cousin First Cousin Siblings First Cousin Second Cousin S D Brother/Sister P1C B/S M1C Second Cousin First Cousin Son/Daughter Nephew/Niece First Cousin Second Cousin 1x Removed 1x Removed DS1/DD1 1x Removed 1x Removed P1C1 Ne/Ni M1C1 Second Cousin First Cousin Grand Grand First Cousin Second Cousin 2x Removed 2x Removed Son/Daughter Nephew/Niece 2x Removed 2x Removed P1C2 DS2/DD2 Ne1/Ni1 M1C2 Second Cousin First Cousin Great Grand Great Grand First Cousin Second Cousin 3x Removed 3x Removed Son/Daughter Nephew/Niece 3x Removed 3x Removed P1C3 DS3/DD3 Ne2/Ni2 M1C3 HEIRS DEFINED T.C.A. § 31-2-104 § SPOUSE (if no issue) § SPOUSE & CHILDREN (Spouse gets child's share but not less than 1/3. Issue of same degree take equally; remote degree by representation) § PARENT(S) (if no spouse or issue) § SIBLINGS & THEIR ISSUE (if no parents) (Deceased sibling's issue take by representation) © November 17, 2001 § GRANDPARENT(S) & THEIR ISSUE (if no spouse, no issue, no parent, no siblings) (1/2 to Paternal side, 1/2 to Maternal side or all to one side if no grandparent or their issue on other side.) S. Lee Akers, J.D. Chattanooga, Tennessee GO NO FURTHER UP THE LINE THAN GRANDPARENTS. OTHER ISSUE OF GREAT GRANDPARENTS DO NOT TAKE .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Placement of Children with Relatives
STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
[Show full text]
Playdays Canada an Initiative of International Play Association (Canada)
PlayDays Canada An Initiative of International Play Association (Canada) Event Hosting Guide Promoting the Child’s Right to Play 1 2 International Play Association (IPA World) IPA World began in 1961 in Copenhagen, Denmark and now has members in nearly 50 countries. The aim and intent of IPA is outlined in Article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which seeks to protect, preserve and promote play for all children worldwide. IPA established the addition of the word ‘play’ to Article 31 in 1980, supporting the global perspective that play is a fundamental part of life. International Play Association Canada (IPA Canada) IPA Canada has been active as a chapter of IPA World since 1983. It protects, preserves and promotes the Child’s Right to Play and is guided by passionate play advocates to uphold Article 31. As an interdisciplinary organization, IPA brings together play animators, planners, psychologists, educators, academics and landscape designers. IPA Canada is supporting the importance of play in Canadian children’s lives through initiatives focused on such areas as children’s environments, play leadership practice and play provision for children experiencing impairment or disability. www.ipacanada.org 3 Contents A. Partners in Play ...................................................................3 B. Introduction .........................................................................5 C. Ingredients for Success ......................................................7 D. Planning: Making the Ordinary !Extraordinary!
[Show full text]
Honkin' Good News
MARK YOUR CALENDARS! March Break Camp: March 11-15 No school and nothing to do? Then why not get out of the house and over to the Sanctuary for a week of fun themed days: What a Hoot Bird Day, Amazing Catapults Day, Discovery Day and so much more! Designed for children in grades 1-5, registration is available now during regular office hours or on our special registration day Feb 27th from 3:00- 7:00pm. Only $25/day. WOW - what a deal! Honkin’ National Wildlife Week: April 7-14 What a great week we have in store for you, to celebrate our Good News favourite person, Jack Miner! National Wildlife Week was established in 1947 to honour and recognize Uncle Jack’s contributions to conservation. Some of the highlights of the week include the Wild Goose Run/Walk in Kennedy Woods on April 7, followed by a traditional pancake breakfast with REAL WINTER 2019 Jack Miner syrup, tapped from our own trees. On April 10, it’s Jack’s birthday: stop in for cupcakes and a special VOLUME 8 | ISSUE 1 announcement about the Drive Thru Art Gallery. New this year is Jack’s Stories - you are invited to hear the best stories about wildlife and Jack Miner held in the historic house on April 12th from 7:00-10:00pm. There will be live music, refreshments and lively story-telling with a chance to win prizes! Call or e-mail us to reserve a spot as a storyteller. National Wildlife Week will feature children’s crafts, nature walks, and museum tours for the whole family.
[Show full text]
Legislating First Cousin Marriage in the Progressive Era
KISSING COUSINS: LEGISLATING FIRST COUSIN MARRIAGE IN THE PROGRESSIVE ERA Lori Jean Wilson Consanguineous or close-kin marriages are older than history itself. They appear in the religious texts and civil records of the earliest known societies, both nomadic and sedentary. Examples of historical cousin-marriages abound. However, one should not assume that consanguineous partnerships are archaic or products of a bygone era. In fact, Dr. Alan H. Bittles, a geneticist who has studied the history of cousin-marriage legislation, reported to the New York Times in 2009 that first-cousin marriages alone account for 10 percent of global marriages.1 As of 2010, twenty-six states in the United States permit first cousin marriage. Despite this legal acceptance, the stigma attached to first-cousin marriage persists. Prior to the mid- nineteenth century, however, the American public showed little distaste toward the practice of first cousin marriage. A shift in scientific opinion emerged in the mid-nineteenth century and had anthropologists questioning whether the custom had a place in western civilization or if it represented a throwback to barbarism. The significant shift in public opinion however, occurred during the Progressive Era as the discussion centered on genetics and eugenics. The American public vigorously debated whether such unions were harmful or beneficial to the children produced by first cousin unions. The public also debated what role individual states, through legislation, should take in restricting the practice of consanguineous marriages. While divergent opinions emerged regarding the effects of first cousin marriage, the creation of healthy children and a better, stronger future generation of Americans remained the primary goal of Americans on both sides of the debate.
[Show full text]
Son Preference Or Son Pressure? Narratives of Fertility Decisions from Chinese Female Migrants Felicia Feng Tian Department of S
Son Preference or Son Pressure? Narratives of Fertility Decisions from Chinese Female Migrants Felicia Feng Tian Department of Sociology Duke University Danielle Kane Department of Sociology and Anthropology DePauw University Ke Liang Department of Sociology and Anthropology Baruch College, The City University of New York 2 ABSTRACT Though son preference has been identified as a major determinant for the imbalanced sex ratios at birth in China, Little about how son preference influences fertility decisions. Most studies either assume Chinese parents prefer sons as rational choices because of sons’ higher wage-earning or the ability to provide old-age support, or for cultural reasons such as lineage preservation and prosperity. By exploring narratives of fertility decisions for 42 Chinese female migrants, this article argues that son preference is not an individual choice per se, nor a joint decision by the couple, but a pressure descending from the upper generation of the husband's family, from mothers-in-law in particular. The results suggest the importance of an intergenerational perspective in exploring son preference in the Chinese context. 3 The sex ratios at birth in China, as defined by the number of boys over 100 girls, has skyrocketed since the 1980s. The officially reported sex ratios at birth have increased from 108.5 in 1982, to 113.8 in 1990, 119.9 in 2000, and 120.5 in 2005 (National Bureau of Statistics 2007). The actual ratio could be slightly lower, if one considers the underreporting of daughters in censuses (Goodkind 2004, 2011; Zeng et al 1993). However, China's sex ratios at birth fall far out of reach of the biological stable range between 104 and 106 (Dyson 2012).
[Show full text]
Feeling Controlled in Marriage: a Phenomenon Specific to Physically Aggressive Couples? Miriam K
Journal of Family Psychology Copyright 1999 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 1999, Vol. 13, No. 1,20-32 0893-320O/99/$3.0O Feeling Controlled in Marriage: A Phenomenon Specific to Physically Aggressive Couples? Miriam K. Ehrensaft, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Richard E. Heyman, K. Daniel O'Leary, and Erika Lawrence State University of New York at Stony Brook Spouses in maritally happy nonaggressive (H; n = 21), distressed nonaggressive (DNA; n = 16), and distressed aggressive (DA; n = 20) marriages were inter- viewed about their perceptions of their spouse as controlling. Four areas of spousal control were assesed: involvement in decision making, relationships with family and friends, freedom to plan activities independently, and sense of competence and self-respect. Overall, as expected, spouses in happy marriages reported feeling less controlled than spouses in the 2 distressed groups. Few gender differences were obtained, with the exception that wives in aggressive marriages were more likely to report that their husbands controlled their sense of competence and self-respect. Differences between the DA and DNA groups depended on the specific area of control. Wives in the aggressive couples were significantly more likely than their husbands to state that their spouse's aggression was an attempt to control them. Scholars and practitioners from a variety of between marital aggression and control, defini- theoretical perspectives have asserted that there tions of control produced by each theory, and is a relationship between coercive control and empirical research that has been associated with the occurrence of physical aggression in mar- these definitions. Then a definition of control is riage (Black, 1983; Finkelhor, 1983; Gondolf, offered, drawing from each of these three 1985; Stets, 1988).
[Show full text]
How Understanding the Aboriginal Kinship System Can Inform Better
How understanding the Aboriginal Kinship system can inform better policy and practice: social work research with the Larrakia and Warumungu Peoples of the Northern Territory Submitted by KAREN CHRISTINE KING BSW A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Social Work Faculty of Arts and Science Australian Catholic University December 2011 2 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP AND SOURCES This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person‟s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee. Karen Christine King BSW 9th March 2012 3 4 ABSTRACT This qualitative inquiry explored the kinship system of both the Larrakia and Warumungu peoples of the Northern Territory with the aim of informing social work theory and practice in Australia. It also aimed to return information to the knowledge holders for the purposes of strengthening Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing. This study is presented as a journey, with the oral story-telling traditions of the Larrakia and Warumungu embedded and laced throughout. The kinship system is unpacked in detail, and knowledge holders explain its benefits in their lives along with their support for sharing this knowledge with social workers.
[Show full text]
Scottish Naming Customs Craig L
Scottish Naming Customs Craig L. Foster AG® [email protected] Origins of Scottish Surnames Surnames are said to have begun to be used by Scottish nobility at the direction of King Malcolm Ceannmor in about 1061. William L. Kirk, Jr. “Introduction to the Derivation of Scottish Surnames,” Clan Macrae (1992), http://www.clanmacrae.ca/documents/names.htm “In some Highland areas, though, fixed surnames did not become the norm until the 18th century, and in parts of the Northern Isles until the 19th century.” “Surnames,” ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Types of Scottish Surnames Location-Based Surnames Some people were named for localities. For example, the surname “Murray from the lands of Moray, and Ogilvie, which, according to Black, derives from the barony of Ogilvie in the parish of Glamis, Angus. Tenants might in turn assume, or be given, the name of their landlord, despite having no kinship with him.” Sometimes surnames referred to a specific topographical feature of the landscape such as a river, a loch, a hill, etc. Some examples might include: Names that contain 'kirk' (as in Kirkland, or Selkirk) which means 'church' in Gaelic; 'Muir' or names that contain it (means 'moor' in Gaelic); A name which has 'Barr' in it (this means 'hilltop' in Gaelic). “Surnames,” ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Occupational Surnames A significant amount of surnames come from occupations. So a smith became known as Smith or Gow (Gaelic for smith), a tailor became Tailor/Taylor, a baker was Baxter, a weaver was Webster, etc. “Surnames,”ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Descriptive Surnames “Nicknames were 'descriptional' ie.
[Show full text]
Happy Mothers Day! Pdf, Epub, Ebook
HAPPY MOTHERS DAY! PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Mercer Mayer | 20 pages | 10 May 2013 | HarperCollins | 9780060539702 | English | New York, NY, New Zealand Happy Mothers Day! PDF Book It was created by the labor movement in the late 19th century and became a federal The nearby Mata Tirtha village is named after these ponds. Play media. With the Nazi party in power during —, the situation changed radically. International Day of Non-Violence 2 Halloween The head of the Association of German Florists cited "the inner conflict of our Volk and the loosening of the family" as his reason for introducing the holiday. You really are amazing! The Ghost Festival in Medieval China. Happy Mother's Day to the greatest mom! Retrieved 11 October Later Amin heard the story of a widowed mother who devoted her whole life to raising her son until he became a doctor. Funny Mother's Day Quotes. Archived from the original on 6 June The legislature approved a proposal in to designate the birthday of Sakyamuni Buddha — which falls on the eighth day of the fourth month of the lunar calendar — a national holiday and to celebrate the special occasion concurrently with International Mother's Day, which is celebrated on the second Sunday of May. The mother hands out to the family the hash. Collins 6 May You deserve to have been promoted by now! Intersezioni tra storia, scienza e arte in Italian. In President Manuel L. Mother's Day is a special day to honor your mother and celebrate the role of mothers in society. Thanks for always believing in me and doing so much for me each day.
[Show full text]
Cussed in Chapters A-300 and A-100
TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF TANF 150 GUIDE TO DETERMINING TANF-RELATIONSHIP This guide provides more detailed information about the eligibility requirements for relationship discussed in chapters A-300 and A-100. This guide is not all inclusive. A B C If the child no longer lives with Can the person listed in column B be a the relative listed +below... And the child now lives with... TANF caregiver/payee for the child? 1. Mother 1. Stepfather 1. Yes 2. Father 2. Stepmother 2. Yes 3. Stepfather 3. Stepfather's Spouse 3. Yes 4. Stepmother 4. Stepmother's Spouse 4. Yes 5. Stepfather's Spouse 5. New Spouse 5. No 6. Stepmother's Spouse 6. New Spouse 6. No *7. Grandmother 7. Step Grandfather 7. Yes *8. Grandfather 8. Step Grandmother 8. Yes *9. Step Grandfather 9. New Spouse 9. No *10. Step Grandmother 10. New Spouse 10. No 11. Brother 11. Sister In-law 11. Yes 12. Sister 12. Brother In-law 12. Yes 13. Brother In-law 13. New Spouse 13. No 14. Sister In-law 14. New Spouse 14. No 15. Stepbrother 15. Stepbrother's Spouse 15. Yes 16. Stepbrother's Spouse 16. New Spouse 16. No 17. Stepsister 17. Stepsister's Spouse 17. Yes 18. Stepsister's Spouse 18. New Spouse 18. No *19. Aunt 19. Aunt's Spouse 19. Yes *20. Uncle 20. Uncle's Spouse 20. Yes 21. Aunt's Spouse 21. New Spouse 21. No 22. Uncle's Spouse 22. New Spouse 22. No **23. First Cousin 23.
[Show full text]
All in the Family: Attitudes Towards Cousin Marriages Among Young Dutch People from Various Ethnic Groups
Original Evolution, Mind and Behaviour 15(2017), 1–15 article DOI: 10.1556/2050.2017.0001 ALL IN THE FAMILY: ATTITUDES TOWARDS COUSIN MARRIAGES AMONG YOUNG DUTCH PEOPLE FROM VARIOUS ETHNIC GROUPS ABRAHAM P. BUUNK* Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague and University of Groningen, The Netherlands (Received: 11 August 2016; accepted: 01 February 2017) Abstract. The present research examined attitudes towards cousin marriages among young people from various ethnic groups living in The Netherlands. The sample consisted of 245 participants, with a mean age of 21, and included 107 Dutch, 69 Moroccans, and 69 Turks. The parents of the latter two groups came from countries where cousin marriages are accepted. Participants reported more negative than positive attitudes towards cousin marriage, and women reported more negative attitudes than did men. The main objection against marrying a cousin was that it is wrong for religious reasons, whereas the risk of genetic defects was considered less important. Moroccans had less negative attitudes than both the Dutch and the Turks, who did not differ from each other. Among Turks as well as among Moroccans, a more positive attitude towards cousin marriage was predicted independently by a preference for parental control of mate choice and religiosity. This was not the case among the Dutch. Discussion focuses upon the differences between Turks and Moroccans, on the role of parental control of mate choice and religiosity, and on the role of incest avoidance underlying attitudes towards cousin marriage. Keywords: cousin marriage, consanguineity, Turks, Moroccans ATTITUDES TOWARDS COUSIN MARRIAGE The large cultural and historical variation in the attitudes towards cousin marriages suggests that there is not a universal, evolved mechanism against mating with cousins (cf.
[Show full text]
Proof of Marriage for the Purpose of Obtaining Retirement Benefits We Are Asking for Proof of Your Marriage; the Items Listed Below Tell You What You Should Send Us
United States Office of Personnel Management Retirement Operations Washington, D.C. 20415-0001 Proof of Marriage for the Purpose of Obtaining Retirement Benefits We are asking for proof of your marriage; the items listed below tell you what you should send us. Ceremonial Marriage C. The address or addresses at which you resided while To prove a ceremonial marriage we require: you lived together; 1. A copy of the original certificate of marriage, if available; D. Whether there was any public announcement in or connection with your common law marriage; 2. A copy of a public or religious institutions’s record of E. Whether you and your spouse were regarded among marriage, or a statement as to the contents of such a record, your neighbors, friends, and relatives as being husband certified by the authorized custodian of the record; or and wife during the time you lived together; and 3. If neither of the above proofs of marriage is available, you F. How the person swearing the affidavit is in a position to must send us a statement explaining why such proofs know the facts being presented in the affidavit. cannot be obtained. Along with this explanation, send us any or all proofs listed below: 2. Your own affidavit is also required. In your affidavit you should state: - An affidavit of the clergyman or other authorized A. The date on which and the State in which you and your official who performed the marriage. spouse mutually agreed to become husband and wife; - Affidavits of two witnesses to the marriage ceremony.
[Show full text]