Illi 111Iillill Iiiilli!111Iiil 0% 2O93

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Illi 111Iillill Iiiilli!111Iiil 0% 2O93 178 Illi 111Iillill iiiilli!111Iiil ATO3001 76 ~V~,op/A¼ Cp dA1jt THE ROLE OF THE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT COOPERATIVES N THE FERTILISER MARKET IN TURKEY '" 9A AKCAY, Y. CICEK, A. AKAY, M. SAYILI, M. UZU1NOZ, M. ~14 Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Tokat-TURKEY 0% 2O93 1. INTRODUCTION Agriculture has an certain degree of importance in the development and develop ig countries in the world. It is necessary to increase agricultural production and productivity to counter balance increasing food demand. To be able to reach to the goal, inputs one of which is fertiliser used in the agricultural production should be used in the optimum amount in the modem agriculture. Increasing the productivity in the agricultural production depends on the transformation of economic unity of the farms (KARACAN, 1991). However, approximately 85 percentage of the farmers in Turkey has made agricultural activity on the farm land which is smaller than that of 100 decar ( decar = 1 000 in 2 ) . This case has shown that there is a domination of the type of small family farms in Turkish agriculture. These farms generally have insufficient capital, saving, modem equipment, input usage and credit. This farm structure has increased the importance of the Agricultural Credit Cooperatives (ACC) providing credit either inputs or cash. And also ACC have played an important role to transfer finance from government to farmers (MUJLAYiM, 1995). The first main goal of the study is to determine the role of the ACC having a great importance in the fertiliser market in Turkey. The second goal is to evaluate the relationship between farmers-ACC and farmers-private fertiliser agent in the selected region, central district of Tokat province. Also the problems that the farmers faced and the preference of buying fertiliser from either ACC or private fertiliser agent of the farmers and some suggestions related to the subjects were investigated. 2. MATERIAL and METHOD The material of this study arose from studies related to the subjects, the reports and statistical data. Also the data obtained from total seven ACC in the seven different region of central district of Tokat province and farmers living in the same place were used. The seven different region where there is the ACC is central district of Tokat, Sngiit, Emirseyit, Ortakidy, Akbelen, Tahitoba and (amlibel. 179 3. THE ACTIVTIES OF THE ACC IN TURKEY 3.1. The Credit Applications One of the most important goals of the ACC is to give short or mid-term credit to the members. The upper credit limit is determined by the Agricultural Bank of Turkish Republic (TC. Ziraat Bankasi) and the head office of the ACC. The short-term credit covering seed, fertiliser, labour wages e.t.c. is real, goods or cash and one annual. The mid-term investment credit covering livestock, dairy farms and agricultural equipment is real, goods and up to five annual (KARACAN, 1991). The agricultural inputs that the ACC provides are fertiliser, fodder, seed, pesticides and agricultural equipment. The credit amounts given by the ACC is seen in table 1. There is a reel increase in the credit given by the ACC in the period of years 1987-1996 except 1988, 1989 and 1994. As a matter of fact, the reel increase of the credit given 1996 is 48.71 percentage compared to the credit given 1987. Table 1I.The Credits Given by the Agricultural Credit Cooperatives in Turkey Credit Amount Given Net Assets T.R. Agr. Bank Credit Amount Index Years (millions TL) (Current) () Placements (%) Given (Reel) (1987= 100) 1987 629 162 29.20 70.80 629 162 100.00 1988 966 039 24.80 75.20 566 592 90.06 1989 1 570 002 24.00 76.00 561 718 89.28 1990 2 708 372 23.00 77.00 636 216 101.12 1991 4 910 413 20.00 80.00 742 427 118.00 1992 7 146 182 15.00 85.00 666 621 105.95 1993 11 824 987 11.00 89.00 696 407 110.69 1994 22 847 412 13.70 86.30 609 768 96.92 1995 54 767 489 13.30 86.70 775 227 123.22 1996 118 910 404 23.30 76.70 935 610 1 148.71 Source: ANONYMOUS, 1997, TKK Merkez Birlibi, Muhasebe ye Finansman Daire Ba~kanli Kayitlari, Ankara. 80.30 Percentage of the credit given by ACC in 1996 is short-term credit and 19.70 percentage is mid-term credit. Fertiliser has the highest credit share (33.10%) in the total credit amount given by the ACC (ANONYMOUS, 1997). 3.2. The Place of the ACC in the Fertiliser Distribution in Turkey The ACC has the most important share of the fertiliser marketing in Turkey. The amount of fertiliser usage is seen in table 2 in Turkey. Also table 3 includes the amount of fertiliser usage distributed by the ACC in Turkey. And table 4 shows the share of the fertiliser usage of the ACC in Turkey. 180 While the amount fertiliser usage in 1990 in Turkey was 4 995 407 tons, this amount reached 5 449 375 tons with 9.09 percentage increase in 1998. CAN (26% N) fertiliser had the highest usage rate (23.36%) in 1998 in Turkey (Table 2). While the fertiliser distributed by the ACC was 1 094 923 tons, it reached 1 542 623 tons with 40.89% increase in 1998 (Table 3). Table 2. Fertiliser Usagre in Turkey (tons) Fertiliser Variety 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 A.S. (%2 N) 450260 417664 350069 306183 239312 292718 244297 303278-345416 C.A.N. (%26N) 1659556 1217719 1332290 1509566 1428786 1252951 1294681 1187884 1272858 A.N. (%33N) 8722 152111 266269 134701 86789 144559 191933 249551 364719 ORE 627199 594815 625568 854648 617179 580804 728356 725448 900719 TSP 169646 147135 108633 169054 84024 90415 60261 82389 66873 DAP 618505 709967 734036 882775 447574 560335 573600 607417 723541 20.20.0 1020903 899758 1000566 974187 688227 945621 975174 1043235 1194369 26.13.0 17406 7182 1464 -- -- -- -- 1010 -- 1s.15s.1is 358104 239203 247207 282214 217066 271698 306556 306894 333943 P.S. 14974 15950 18857 19912 16512 11615 17307 16465 19980 Others 50132 138300 251282 369759 172340 235350 205134 118884 226957 TOTAL 4995407! 45398041 4936241 5502999 3997809 4386066 4597299 46424551 5449375 Source: ANONYMOUS, 1999/, Gibre Ureticileri Dernegi Kayailari, Ankara. Table 3. The Fertiliser Amount Distributed by the ACC in Turkey (tons) Fertiliser Variety 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 A.S.(%2 N) 82655 18050 57585 74911 80650 95801 102263 103295 90818 C.A.N. (%26N) 418040 51345 281334 431790 435174 458733 534473 510678 428335 A.N. (%33N) 857 8277 2052 1005 9545 47431 88347 114982 123095 ORE 127784 29546 115508 149507 A 182134 93706 194643 200788 183266 TSP 46214 27871 31547 29445 29181 38732 31084 27300 25616 DAP 110843 102400 152315 194904 196225 291208 324747 358819 301207 20.20.0 256341 176612 251755 245864 286477 376950 398579 382199 303115 15.15.15 52180 19745 45827 52477 65842 78032 90922 85674 76985 P.S. 9 -- -- 1866 2429 2729 3341 3436 3054 Others -- 1 - -1 -- - - -- 7212 7132 TOTAL 1094923 433846, 937923 11181769 1287657, 1483322, 1768399~ 1794383 1542623 Source: ANONYMOUS, 1999/, Gilbre Ureticileri Dernegi Kayitlari, Ankara. The fertiliser share distributed by the ACC in total distributed fertiliser in Turkey was 21.92 percentage in 1990, this rate reached 29.3 1% in 1998 (Table 4). This case has shown that the importance of the ACC in the fertiliser distribution of Turkey has increased. Table 4. The Share of Fertiliser Amount Distributed by the ACC in Turkey (%) (*) Fertiliser Variety 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 A. S. (%21N) 18.36 4.32 16.45 24.47 33.70 32.73 41.86 34.06 26.29 C.A.N. (%26N) 25.19 4.22 21.12 28.60 30.46 36.61 41.28 42.99 33.65 A.N. (%33N) 9.83 5.44 0.77 0.75 11.00 32.81 46.03 46.08 33.75 ORE 20.37 4.97 18.46 17.49 29.51 16.13 26.72 27.68 20.35 TSP 27.24 18.94 29.04 17.72 34.73 42.84 51.58 33.14 38.31 DAP 17.92 14.42 20.75 22.08 43.84 51.97 56.62 59.07 41.63 20.20.0 25.11 19.63 25.16 25.24 41.63 39.86 40.87 36.64 25.38 15.15.15 14.57 8.25 18.54 18.59 30.33 28.72 29.66 27.92 23.05 P.S. 0.06 -- -- 9.37 14.71 23.50 19.30 20.87 15.29 Others -- - - - --- - 6.07 3.14 TOTAL 21.92- 9.56 19.00 21.47 32.21 33.82t 38.47 38.65 28.31 ()It is obtained from table 2 and 3. 181 4. THE PLACE OF THE ACC AND) PRIVATE AGENTS IN THE FERTILISER USAGE AND DISTRIBUTION IN~ TOKAT PROVINCE 4.1. The Fertiliser Usage in Tokat Province The amount of fertiliser usage in Tokat province in the 1990-1998 years is given in table 5. Table 5. The Amount of Fertiliser Usage in Tokat Province (tons) Fertiliser Variety 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 A.5S. (%21IN) 1385.00 1985.5( 1981.0 451.25 57.70 1215.99 802.45 828.20 1121.20 A.N. (%26N) 25580.0( 16466.7( 16461.0 9511.40 6057.95 9806.75 13187.27 12752.82 10145.55 A.N.
Recommended publications
  • Producers of Vineyards in Central District Villages of Tokat Province Current Situation (Tokat Province of Kazova Region)
    Journal of New Results in Science (JNRS) Volume: 8 Issue: 2 ISSN: 1304-7981 http://dergipark.gov.tr/en/pub/jnrs Year: 2019 Research Article Pages: 17-25 Open Access Received: 10.12.2019 Accepted: 24.12.2019 Published: 27.12.2019 Producers of Vineyards in Central District Villages of Tokat Province Current Situation (Tokat Province of Kazova Region) Bilge Gözener*, Nurgül Karadoğan Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey *Corresponding author, [email protected] Abstract: U.S. viticulture in the world in general, Chile, South Africa, Australia, Turkey, Greece and are made in Iran. Situated on the most favorable climate for viticulture in the world, Turkey has a very old and rich aquaculture potential with a deep-rooted culture of viticulture. the vineyard area and production values are among the top six countries in the world Turkey, viticulture and core seedless raisins in the first degree and second degree is characterized by the production of table grapes. Tokat province is one of the most important wine-growing areas in Turkey. Viticulture is successfully done in areas between 230 m and 1000 m altitude. Total vineyard area in Tokat province is 6084 hectares. Tokat, in terms of vineyard area in Turkey, ranks 31. In terms of production. 39.8% of the vineyard areas in the Center, Market and Turhal; 33.2% in Erbaa and Niksar; 26.7% are in Zile. Approximately 50% of the grapes produced in Tokat region are evaluated as table, 25% molasses, 20% alcoholic beverages and 5% as keme. In this study carried out in order to reveal the current status of viticulture producers in the central district of Tokat province; The main population of the study consisted of 3 villages (Emirseyit, Güryıldız, Büyükyıldız) in Kazova Region, which were selected as the research region.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Environmental Issues in a Turkish Province
    Polish J. of Environ. Stud. Vol. 15, No. 4 (2006), 635-642 Letter to Editor Perceptions of Environmental Issues in a Turkish Province K. Esengun*, M. Sayili, H. Akca Gaziosmanpasa university, Faculty of agriculture, Department of agricultural Economics, 60240 tokat, turkey Received: March 4, 2005 Virtual Institute for Reference Materials Accepted: January 26, 2006 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Chemical Faculty, Gdansk University of Technology is a Abstract partner of EU project G7RT-CT-2002-05104 (2003-2005) aimed at establishing a virtual institute for reference materials. Virtual Institute for Reference Materials VIRM asbl (non-profit organisation) this study focused on the investigation of the structure of environmental organizations, determination was officially founded and registered with seat in Luxembourg in October 2004. of the problems faced by these organizations, explanation of the politics of governmental and non-govern- Central mission of VIRM asbl is to facilitate dissemination of information and advice, know-how mental organizations related to proposed solutions to environmental problems, and illuminating relation- and help on Reference Materials and related fields. It offers extensive features (searchable RM ships between the two groups. The Tokat province in Turkey was chosen as the research area. A question- database, projects, library, conferences, training activities, newsletter, etc.). The RM database con- naire was prepared and sent to 16 governmental and non-governmental organizations. Findings indicated tains
    [Show full text]
  • Çorum Yöresinde Insanlar Üzerinde Parazitlenen Kenelerde Riketsiya Varlığının Araştırılması
    Araştırma Makalesi/Original Article Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi Makale Dili “Türkçe”/Article Language “Turkish” Çorum yöresinde insanlar üzerinde parazitlenen kenelerde riketsiya varlığının araştırılması Investigation of the presence of rickettsiae in ticks parasitizing on humans in Çorum region Ahmet BURSALI1, Adem KESKIN1, Aysun KESKIN1, Tuğba KUL-KÖPRÜLÜ1, Şaban TEKIN2 ÖZET ABSTRACT Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Çorum yöresinde insanlarda Objective: The aim of this study is to determine parazitlenen kenelerde riketsiya varlığının Polimeraz the rickettsiae in ticks collected on human in Çorum Zincir Reaksiyonu (PZR) yöntemiyle araştırılması Province by using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). amaçlanmıştır. Methods: A total of 1010 tick samples which were Yöntem: Çorum yöresinde insanlar üzerinden collected on humans identified to species level in toplanan 1.010 adet kene toplanarak morfolojik terms of the morphological characters. Total DNA’s karakterlerine göre tür teşhisleri yapılmıştır. Bu individually extracted from ticks were screened for the örneklerden bireysel olarak elde edilen total DNA’lar presence of Spotted Fever Group rickettsiae using the riketsiyal sitrat sentaz (gltA, 381 bp) ve dış membran PCR targeting rickettsial citrate synthase (gltA, 381 bp) protein A (ompA, 532 bp) gen bölgelerini hedefleyen and outer membrane protein (ompA, 532 bp) genes. primer setleri kullanılarak PZR yöntemi ile taranmıştır. Results: Out of 741 Hyalomma marginatum ticks Bulgular: Çorum ilinde insanlar üzerinden collected from humans in Çorum Province, 51 (6.88%) toplanan 741 Hyalomma marginatum örneğinin 51 were infected Rickettsia aeschlimannii, 3 (0.4%) were (%6,88)’inde Rickettsia aeschlimannii, 3 (%0,4)’ünde infected Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae. Out Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae; 32 Dermacentor of 32 Dermacentor marginatus ticks, 3 (9.4%) were marginatus örneğinin 3 (%9,4)’ünde Rickettsia infected Rickettsia raoultii and 3 (9.4%) were infected raoultii, 3 (%9,4)’ünde Rickettsia slovaca varlığı tespit Rickettsia slovaca.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity of Ixodid Ticks Feeding on Humans in Amasya, Turkey: Seasonal Abundance and Presence of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus
    VECTOR/PATHOGEN/HOST INTERACTION,TRANSMISSION Species Diversity of Ixodid Ticks Feeding on Humans in Amasya, Turkey: Seasonal Abundance and Presence of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus 1 1,2 1 1 3 A. BURSALI, S. TEKIN, A. KESKIN, M. EKICI, AND E. DUNDAR Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article-abstract/48/1/85/905733 by Balikesir University user on 22 August 2019 J. Med. Entomol. 48(1): 85Ð93 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/ME10034 ABSTRACT Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are important pests transmitting tick-borne diseases such as Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) to humans. Between 2002 and 2009, numerous CCHF cases were reported in Turkey, including Amasya province. In the current study, species diversity, seasonal abundance of ticks, and presence of CCHF virus (CCHFV) in ticks infesting humans in several districts of Amasya province were determined. In the survey, a total of 2,528 ixodid ticks were collected from humans with tick bite from April to November 2008 and identiÞed to species. Hyalomma marginatum (18.6%), Rhipicephalus bursa (10.3%), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (5.7%), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (2.2%), Dermacentor marginatus (2.5%), Haemaphysalis parva (3.6%), and Ixodes ricinus (1.6%) were the most prevalent species among 26 ixodid tick species infesting humans in Amasya province. Hyalomma franchinii Tonelli & Rondelli, 1932, was a new record for the tick fauna of Turkey. The most abundant species were the members of Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus through summer and declined in fall, whereas relative abundances of Ixodes and Dermacentor ticks were always low on humans in the province. Of 25 Hyalomma tick pools tested, seven pools were CCHFV positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Turkey in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook TURKEY [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Turkey By Sinan Hastorun Turkey’s mineral industry produced primarily metals and decreases for illite, 72%; refined copper (secondary) and nickel industrial minerals; mineral fuel production consisted mainly (mine production, Ni content), 50% each; bentonite, 44%; of coal and refined petroleum products. In 2016, Turkey was refined copper (primary), 36%; manganese (mine production, the world’s leading producer of boron, accounting for 74% Mn content), 35%; kaolin and nitrogen, 32% each; diatomite, of world production (excluding that of the United States), 29%; bituminous coal and crushed stone, 28% each; chromite pumice and pumicite (39%), and feldspar (23%). It was also the (mine production), 27%; dolomite, 18%; leonardite, 16%; salt, 2d-ranked producer of magnesium compounds (10% excluding 15%; gold (mine production, Au content), 14%; silica, 13%; and U.S. production), 3d-ranked producer of perlite (19%) and lead (mine production, Pb content) and talc, 12% each (table 1; bentonite (17%), 4th-ranked producer of chromite ore (9%), Maden İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 2018b). 5th-ranked producer of antimony (3%) and cement (2%), 7th-ranked producer of kaolin (5%), 8th-ranked producer of raw Structure of the Mineral Industry steel (2%), and 10th-ranked producer of barite (2%) (table 1; Turkey’s industrial minerals and metals production was World Steel Association, 2017, p. 9; Bennett, 2018; Bray, 2018; undertaken mainly by privately owned companies. The Crangle, 2018a, b; Fenton, 2018; Klochko, 2018; McRae, 2018; Government’s involvement in the mineral industry was Singerling, 2018; Tanner, 2018; van Oss, 2018; West, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • The Seroprevalence of Rickettsia Conorii in Humans Living in Villages
    T. GÜNEŞ, Ö. POYRAZ, M. ATAŞ, N. H. TURGUT Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42 (3): 441-448 © TÜBİTAK Original Article E-mail: [email protected] doi:10.3906/sag-1102-1383 Th e seroprevalence of Rickettsia conorii in humans living in villages of Tokat Province in Turkey, where Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus is endemic, and epidemiological similarities of both infectious agents Turabi GÜNEŞ1, Ömer POYRAZ2, Mehmet ATAŞ 3, Nergiz Hacer TURGUT1 Aim: Tokat Province is an epicenter for Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in Turkey. Th e aim of this study was to investigate the seroprevalence of Rickettsia conorii and to clarify the epidemiological similarities between CCHFV and R. conorii in Tokat Province. Materials and methods: Th e prevalence of antibodies reactive with R. conorii was examined by ELISA in 364 sera, 151 of which were seropositive for CCHFV. Results: Th e overall prevalence of antibodies reactive with R. conorii was 36.81%. Th e prevalence of antibodies to R. conorii infection was higher in humans who showed CCHFV seropositivity than seronegativity, 52.32% and 25.82%, respectively (P = 0.001). A signifi cant diff erence in seroprevalence was found between groups who had a history of tick bite and who did not, 41.52% and 29.29%, respectively (P = 0.019). Conclusion: Our data show that people who are a risk group for CCHFV are likely to be a risk group for R. conorii. Key words: Rickettsia conorii, Mediterranean spotted fever, seroprevalence, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, tick- borne infections, Turkey Kırım Kongo hemorajik ateş virüsünün endemik olduğu Tokat’ın köylerinde yaşayan insanlarda Rickettsia conorii seroprevalansı ve her iki enfeksiyon etkeninin epidemiyolojik benzerlikleri Amaç: Tokat, Kırım-Kongo Hemorajik Ateş Virüsü (CCHFV) yönünden yüksek derece endemik bir yöredir.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Systematics of Turkish Species of Exeurytoma
    TurkJZool 29(2005)243-248 ©TÜB‹TAK MorphologyandSystematicsofTurkishSpeciesof Exeurytoma Burks, 1971(Hymenoptera,Chalcidoidea,Eurytomidae),withDescriptionofa NewSpeciesfromEasternAnatolia MiktatDO⁄ANLAR MustafaKemalUniversity,AgricultureFaculty,PlantProtectionDepartment,Antakya,Hatay-TURKEY HalitÇAM GaziosmanpaflaUniversity,AgricultureFaculty,PlantProtectionDepartment,Tokat-TURKEY Received:14.11.2003 Abstract: AnewspeciesofExeurytoma Burks,1971(Hymenoptera,Chalcidoidea,Eurytomidae)fromEasternAnatoliaisdescribed. Morphologiesandsystematicsof2Turkishspecies,E.anatolica Çam,1998fromTokatandE.kebanensis n.sp.fromKeban,Elaz›¤, andfromÖmerli,Mardinwerestudied.Theirdiagnosticcharacteristicswerephotographedusingascanningelectronmicroscopeand someofthemareillustratedasseenunderastereoscopicmicroscopebycameralucida.Anidentificationkeyforthespeciesof Exeurytoma isprovided. KeyWords: Exeurytoma spp.,E.kebanensis n.sp.,Hymenoptera,Eurytomidae,Turkey Do¤uAnadolu’danExeurytoma Burks,1971(Hymenoptera,Chalcidoidea,Eurytomidae) CinsindenYeniBirTürileDi¤erTürkiyeTürününTan›mlar›veMorfolojileri Özet: Do¤uAnadolu’dan Exeurytoma Burks,1971(Hymenoptera,Chalcidoidea,Eurytomidae)cinsinegirenveKeban,Elaz›¤ile Ömerli,Mardin’dentoplananyenibirtür, E.kebanensis n.sp.,ileTokat’tabulunandi¤ertür, E.anatolica Çam,1998’inmorfolojik özellikleriçal›fl›lm›flvetan›mlar›yap›lm›flt›r.Butürlerinay›rtediciözellikleriSEM’dançekilenfoto¤raflarvestereoskobi k mikroskoptankamera–lucidayard›m›ylaçizilenresimlerlegösterilmifltir.Cinsintürleriiçinbirtan›anahtar›dahaz›rlanm›flt› r. AnahtarSözcükler:
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography
    Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography The following numbers are never used alone, but may be used as required (either directly when so noted or through the interposition of notation 09 from Table 1) with any number from the schedules, e.g., public libraries (027.4) in Japan (—52 in this table): 027.452; railroad transportation (385) in Brazil (—81 in this table): 385.0981. They may also be used when so noted with numbers from other tables, e.g., notation 025 from Table 1. When adding to a number from the schedules, always insert a decimal point between the third and fourth digits of the complete number SUMMARY —001–009 Standard subdivisions —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas —2 Biography —3 Ancient world —4 Europe —5 Asia —6 Africa —7 North America —8 South America —9 Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds —001–008 Standard subdivisions —009 History If “history” or “historical” appears in the heading for the number to which notation 009 could be added, this notation is redundant and should not be used —[009 01–009 05] Historical periods Do not use; class in base number —[009 1–009 9] Geographic treatment and biography Do not use; class in —1–9 —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas Not limited by continent, country, locality Class biography regardless of area, region, place in —2; class specific continents, countries, localities in —3–9 > —11–17 Zonal, physiographic, socioeconomic regions Unless other instructions are given, class
    [Show full text]
  • Zile – Güzelbeyli Kasabas›Nda Uygulanan Arazi Toplulaflt›Rmas›N
    TurkJAgricFor 26(2002)101-108 ©TÜB‹TAK Tokat–Zile–GüzelbeyliKasabas›ndaUygulananArazi Toplulaflt›rmas›n›ÇiftçilerinBenimsemesiniEtkileyen Sosyo–EkonomikFaktörlerinBelirlenmesiÜzerineBirAraflt›rma NurayKIZILASLAN,SevilayALMUS GaziosmanpaflaÜniversitesi,ZiraatFakültesi,Tar›mEkonomisiBölümü,Tokat-TÜRK‹YE GeliflTarihi:05.06.2000 Özet: Buaraflt›rma,arazitoplulaflt›rmas›uygulananTokat–Zile–GüzelbeyliKasabas›ndakiçiftçilerin,toplulaflt›rmay›benimseme davran›fllar›n›etkileyenfaktörleriortayakoymakamac›ylayap›lm›flt›r.Araflt›rmadatoplulaflt›rmay›benimseyenvebenimsemeyen çiftçileraras›ndabirfarkl›l›kolupolmad›¤›n›ortayakoymakamac›ylaKhi-Kareanaliziyap›lm›flt›r.Analizlerinsonucundaçif tçilerin toplulaflt›rmay›benimsemelerindesosyalkat›l›mdüzeyi,arazitoplulaflt›rmas›bilinçdüzeyininetkilioldu¤usaptanm›flt›r.Bus onuç, çiftçilerinsosyalçevresiningenifllemesiylefarkl›aktivitelerekat›l›mlar›n›nartt›¤›n›gösterebilir.Ayr›ca,araflt›rmadatop lulaflt›rmay› benimseyençiftçilerinfarkl›toplulaflt›rmabilinçdüzeylerindeekonomikfaktörleritibariylegruplararas›ndakifarkl›l›¤›nölçülmesinde varyansanalizinebaflvurulmufltur.Analizsonuçlar›nagöretoplulaflt›rmay›benimseyençiftçileriniflletmegeniflli¤ibak›m›ndangruplar aras›ndakifarkl›l›könemlibulunmufltur.Arazitoplulaflt›rmas›n›benimseyençiftçilerindahikendiaralar›ndafarkl›l›klar›nold u¤u söylenebilir.Ayr›ca,ikigruportalamalar›aras›ndakifark›nistatistikselolarakanlaml›olupolmad›¤›n›nbelirlenmesindekul lan›lant testisonucunagörearazitoplulaflt›rmas›n›benimseyenvebenimsemeyençiftçileriniflletmegeniflli¤i,parselsay›lar›,toplulafl t›rma öncesivesonras›ndasahipolduklar›suluarazivarl›¤›,toplulaflt›rmasonras›sahipolduklar›yoluolanparselsay›s›,tar›mürünleriy›ll›k
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep and Goats in Turkey
    i FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND PROTECTION PAPER 60 Sheep and goats in Turkey by B. C. Yalçin FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OFTHE UNITED NATIONS Rome,1986 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on tne part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. territory, city or area or of its authorities. or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-21 ISBN 92-5-102449-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval System, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1986 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author is qrateful to the heads of Animal Husbandry Departments of the veterinary and agricultural faculties of different universities in the country and to the directors of related research institutes for providing reprints and other published material, to Mrs. S. Yatçin for drawing the figures, and to Mrs. Tuzkaya for typing the manuscript. FOREWORD The 65.5 million sheep and goats in Turkey constitute the largest national herd in the Near East region. At present, they contribute 43 percent to the total, meat and 33 percent to the total milk produced in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Soil Losses in a Slope Area of Tokat Province Through USLE and WEPP Model
    Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 6(12): 1838-1843, 2018 Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology Available online, ISSN: 2148-127X www.agrifoodscience.com, Turkish Science and Technology Estimation of Soil Losses in a Slope Area of Tokat Province through USLE and WEPP Model Saniye Demir1*, İrfan Oğuz1, Erhan Özer2 1Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Agricultural Faculty, Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60100 Tokat, Turkey 2Middle Black Sea Passage Agricultural Research Institute F. 60250 Tokat, Turkey A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Tokat is one of the developing provinces in terms of urbanism. Therefore, the land use Research Articles changes city-wide which closely affects soil erosion. Numerical estimation of soil erosion is very important to prevent soil losses. In this study, USLE and WEPP Hillslope model Received 18 October 2018 were used to estimate the long-term soil losses in a slope area which used to be a pasture Accepted 10 December 2018 land and then turned into a fruit orchard in Büyükbeybağı area of Tokat province. Erosion sensitivity of the soil in the slope area was detected to be very low. Erosivity value of the Keywords: area is low, soil is resistant to erosion due to pasture land use type and fruit orchard use Universal soil loss equation WEPP model type does not require intense soil cultivation practices. For all these reasons, both Soil loss estimation technologies estimated soil losses of the land to be low. Soil properties Land use *Corresponding Author: E-mail: [email protected] Türk Tarım – Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 6(12): 1838-1843, 2018 Tokat İlin’de Bir Yamaç Arazide Toprak Kayıplarının USLE ve WEPP Model ile Tahmin Edilmesi M A K A L E B İ L G İ S İ Ö Z Tokat, şehircilik bakımından gelişmekte olan illerden birisidir.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Reading the Past:Two Armenian Memoirs from the Ottoman Army and Official Turkish Historiography
    RE-READING THE PAST: TWO ARMENIAN MEMOIRS FROM THE OTTOMAN ARMY AND OFFICIAL TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY By Idil Onen Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Nadia Al-Bagdadi Second Reader: Associate Professor Brett Wilson CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection Abstract The aim of my research is to analyze the position of two Armenian officers’ memoir who participated the First World War in the Ottoman Army. In order to do so, I will examine the memoirs of the Second Lieutenant Kalusd Sürmenyan, who wrote a part of his book on his hometown Erzincan in 1947, and Captain Sarkis Torosyan, who published his memoirs in the Unites States of America in 1947. To accomplish the analysis of these historical texts and their context, the two research questions will direct my study: first, deals with how these officers were seen and remembered by Turkish historiography, either through their treatment or their erasure, while the second attempts to re-consider the end of the Ottoman empire turning to these two army officers themselves and expressing their memories and experiences.
    [Show full text]