DOCSLIB.ORG

ETİ Elektrik Üretim A.Ş

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AKINCI 13.1) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regarding AKINCI HES project has been completed and enclosed approved report and details can be analyzed. ETİ Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Sahrayıcedit. Man., Omca Sk. No 37, Golden Plaza E Blok, Kat: 1 D: 3-4 Tel. : 0 216 355 16 30 34734 Kozyatağı – İSTANBUL Fax : 0 216 355 16 39 Form No : G 604 1 T.R. Ministry of Environment and Forestry General Directorate of Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning Date of decision : 18/03/2008 Decision No: 1457 EIA Certificate In accordance with article 14 of Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation coming into force through publication on 16.12.2003 dated and 25318 numbered Official Gazette, "Akıncı HES Facilities and Material Mines" project has been approved positive in terms of Environmental Impact Assessment. Owner of the project: Eti Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Location of the project: Tokat province, Reşadiye and Niksar districts 2 ETI ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM A.Ş. Final EIA Report Regarding AKINCI HES Facilities and Material Mines TOKAT PROVINCE NİKSAR and REŞADİYE DISTRICTS KELKİT STREAM ROGHT COAST LOCALITY DERYA MÜHENDİSLİK MÜŞAVİRLİK İNŞAAT SANAYİ VE TİCARET ANONİM ŞİRKETİ İSTANBUL-2008 3 ETİ Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Akıncı HES Plants and Material Centres Final ÇED (Environmental Effect Assessment) Report Name of the project owner ETİ ELEKTRİK ÜRETİM A.Ş. Address SAHRAYICEDIT.OMCA SK.No:37 GOLDEN PLAZA E BLOK KAT:1 DAİRE:3 - 4 KADIKÖY/İSTANBUL Phone and Fax numbers TEL: +90(216)355 16 30 FAX: +90(216) 355 16 39 Name of the project TOKAT PROVINCE AKINCI HES FACILITIES AND MATERIAL MINES Open address of the location selected for TOKAT PROVINCE NİKSAR and the project (province, district, region, REŞADİYE DISTRICTS KELKİT locality) STREAM RIGHT COATS LOCALITY Name of the company/study group DERYA MÜHENDİSLİK arranging the report MÜŞAVİRLİK İNŞAAT SANAYİ VE TİCARET ANONİM ŞİRKETİ (Derya Engineering Consultancy Construction Industry and Trade Inc. Co) Address FAHRETTİN KERİM GÖKAY CD. ALTUNİZADE SİTESİ A BLOK DAİRE: 14 ÜSKÜDAR/İSTANBUL Phone and Fax numbers TEL: 0(216) 545 99 40 (2 lines) FAX: 0(216) 545 99 42 Date of Submission of the Report (*) Date .......... /..../200... ......... /..../200.. and Number of Decision (**) 4 ETİ Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Akıncı HES Plants and Material Centres Final ÇED (Environmental Effect Assessment) Report Table of contents Page Table of contents I List of Tables V List of Figures VII Chapter I. Definition and Aim of the Project 1 Chapter II. Location selected for the project 25 II.1. Location of the Project II.2. Location of the units included within scope of the project Chapter III. Economical and Social Dimensions of the Project 38 III.1. Investment program and financial resources regarding realization of the project III.2. Work flow chart or timing table regarding realization of the project III.3. Cost-benefit analysis of the project III.4. Other economical, social and infrastructure projects being out of project scope, but to be realized by owner of the project or other investors in accordance with accomplishment of the project III.5. Other economical, social and infrastructure projects being out of project scope, but to be realized by owner of the project or other investors as a requirement in accordance with accomplishment of the project III.6. Methods to realize naturalization and/or resettlement III.7. Other issues Chapter IV. Determination of the area to be effected by dam, Hes and material mine projects included within the scope of the project and explanation of current environmental characteristics of associated area 46 IV.1. Determination of the area to be effected from the project IV.2. Characteristics of the Physical and Biological Environment and Utilization of Natural Resources included within the impacted area IV.2.1. Meteorological and Climatic Characteristics IV.2.2. Geological Characteristics IV.2.3. Hydrogeological Characteristics of Underground and Thermal Water Resources IV.2.4. Hydrological and ecological characteristics of surface water resources IV.2.5. Current and planned utilization of surface water resources IV.2.6. Soli Characteristics and Usage Condition IV.2.7. Agricultural Lands (agricultural development projects, special product plantation areas), size of irrigated and dry agricultural areas, products designs and annual production amounts IV.2.8. Foresty areas IV.2.9. Protection areas IV.2.10. Kinds of organisms within inland waters (lake, river) IV.2.11. Representation of vegetation types existing within flora and fauna project areas on a map, protective precautions required for organisms to be effected from the project and studies (during construction and operation phase), realization of flora studies to be implemented on the land during vegetation period and determination of relevant period IV.2.12. Mines and fossil fuel resources IV.2.13. Stock-breeding IV.2.14. Lands being under provisions and savings of authorized institutions of the state IV.2.15. Determination of current pollution level of project area and impact area in terms of air, water, soil and sound IV.2.16. Other characteristics IV.3. Characteristics of Socio-Economical Environment IV.3.1. Economical characteristics IV.3.2. Population IV.3.3. Social Infrastructure services within the region IV.3.4. Utilization of urban and rural lands IV.3.5. Other characteristics 5 ETİ Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Akıncı HES Plants and Material Centres Final ÇED (Environmental Effect Assessment) Report Chapter V. Impacts of the project on the are defined within Chapter IV and precautions to be taken 90 V.I. Arrangement of the land, projects during construction and installation phase, their impacts on physical and biological environment and precautions to be taken V.1.1. Location and level of excavation to be performed within scope of works regarding arrangement of the land, amount of excavation, locations to transfer and store excavation wastes such as soil, stone, sand, etc or utilization purposes, materials to be used during excavation V.1.2. Delivery, storage and usage of inflammable, explosive, dangerous, toxic and chemical materials to be used during arrangement of land and construction of units, tools and machinery to be used for these purposes V.1.3. Flood prevention and Drainage processes V.1.4. Amounts, place of delivery or usage purposes of stone, sand, gravel and similar materials to be obtained due to digging, dredging, etc to be performed for any purposes within water environments of project area V.1.5. Number, size, operation area size and coordinates, production quantities in accordance with years, production methods to be performed, step height, width, slope angle, number of steps regarding quarry, sand pit, clay pit to be opened due to construction of dam and representation of initial and final situation of associated mines on a map V.1.6. Determination of method regarding explosion process of material mines, explosion patterns. Amount of explosive material to be used on one shot, their delivery, storage and utilization, evaluation of their impacts through air cannon and rock shooting calculations V.1.7. Production amounts, working duration (day-month-year), delivery route, transportation infrastructure plan, operations regarding construction of infrastructure, machinery equipments to be used regarding material mines. V.1.8. Dust diffusing processes such as crushing, milling, delivery and storage, cumulative values V.1.9. Processes to be performed in order to provide base security and prevent water leakage V.1.10. Size of agricultural areas obtained to supply arrangement of the land and construction site, their land usage capability and type of agricultural products V.1.11. Type and amount of trees to be cut due to arrangement of land and supply of construction materials, impacts of relevant trees on forest ecosystem of the region, natural plant types to be demolished, area of the place where relevant processes are to be performed, possible impacts on fauna V.1.12. Type, characteristics of fuels to be used during operations initiating with arrangement of the land continuing with opening of units, emissions to be formed V.1.13. Amount of water to be supplied from resources included within scope of the project, water supply method and their amounts in accordance with utilization purpose, type and quantity of waste water and environments for discharging waste water V.1.14. Amount of solid waste to be occurred from arrangement of the land to opening of units and methods to eliminate relevant wastes V.1.15. Source and level of vibration, sound to be occurred due to operations initiating with arrangement of land and continuing with opening of units, cumulative values, arrangement of acoustic report in accordance with regulation regarding evaluation and management of environmental sound V.1.16. Where and how to supply accommodation and other technical/social infrastructure needs of personnel and their population to be employed during operations initiating with arrangement of land and continuing with opening of units V.1.17. Risky and dangerous operations included within processes from arrangement of the land to opening of units in terms of human health and environment V.1.18. Area, method of creation of landscape characteristic or site arrangements to be performed for other purposes (forestation and/or green area arrangements, etc), as well as type of trees and plants to be preferred for relevant purposes V.1.19. Determination of possible impacts on cultural and natural assets (traditional urban pattern, archeological residual, natural values required to be protected) V.1.20 Other characteristics V.2. Impacts of the project during operating on physical and biological environment and precautions to be taken V.2.1. Characteristics of overall units included within the project, determination of units where activities are to be performed, their capacity, goods and/or services to be produced within units, production quantity of final and by-products V.2.2.
Recommended publications
  • Producers of Vineyards in Central District Villages of Tokat Province Current Situation (Tokat Province of Kazova Region)

    Producers of Vineyards in Central District Villages of Tokat Province Current Situation (Tokat Province of Kazova Region)

    Journal of New Results in Science (JNRS) Volume: 8 Issue: 2 ISSN: 1304-7981 http://dergipark.gov.tr/en/pub/jnrs Year: 2019 Research Article Pages: 17-25 Open Access Received: 10.12.2019 Accepted: 24.12.2019 Published: 27.12.2019 Producers of Vineyards in Central District Villages of Tokat Province Current Situation (Tokat Province of Kazova Region) Bilge Gözener*, Nurgül Karadoğan Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey *Corresponding author, [email protected] Abstract: U.S. viticulture in the world in general, Chile, South Africa, Australia, Turkey, Greece and are made in Iran. Situated on the most favorable climate for viticulture in the world, Turkey has a very old and rich aquaculture potential with a deep-rooted culture of viticulture. the vineyard area and production values are among the top six countries in the world Turkey, viticulture and core seedless raisins in the first degree and second degree is characterized by the production of table grapes. Tokat province is one of the most important wine-growing areas in Turkey. Viticulture is successfully done in areas between 230 m and 1000 m altitude. Total vineyard area in Tokat province is 6084 hectares. Tokat, in terms of vineyard area in Turkey, ranks 31. In terms of production. 39.8% of the vineyard areas in the Center, Market and Turhal; 33.2% in Erbaa and Niksar; 26.7% are in Zile. Approximately 50% of the grapes produced in Tokat region are evaluated as table, 25% molasses, 20% alcoholic beverages and 5% as keme. In this study carried out in order to reveal the current status of viticulture producers in the central district of Tokat province; The main population of the study consisted of 3 villages (Emirseyit, Güryıldız, Büyükyıldız) in Kazova Region, which were selected as the research region.
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines

    Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines

    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
  • Perceptions of Environmental Issues in a Turkish Province

    Perceptions of Environmental Issues in a Turkish Province

    Polish J. of Environ. Stud. Vol. 15, No. 4 (2006), 635-642 Letter to Editor Perceptions of Environmental Issues in a Turkish Province K. Esengun*, M. Sayili, H. Akca Gaziosmanpasa university, Faculty of agriculture, Department of agricultural Economics, 60240 tokat, turkey Received: March 4, 2005 Virtual Institute for Reference Materials Accepted: January 26, 2006 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Chemical Faculty, Gdansk University of Technology is a Abstract partner of EU project G7RT-CT-2002-05104 (2003-2005) aimed at establishing a virtual institute for reference materials. Virtual Institute for Reference Materials VIRM asbl (non-profit organisation) this study focused on the investigation of the structure of environmental organizations, determination was officially founded and registered with seat in Luxembourg in October 2004. of the problems faced by these organizations, explanation of the politics of governmental and non-govern- Central mission of VIRM asbl is to facilitate dissemination of information and advice, know-how mental organizations related to proposed solutions to environmental problems, and illuminating relation- and help on Reference Materials and related fields. It offers extensive features (searchable RM ships between the two groups. The Tokat province in Turkey was chosen as the research area. A question- database, projects, library, conferences, training activities, newsletter, etc.). The RM database con- naire was prepared and sent to 16 governmental and non-governmental organizations. Findings indicated tains
  • (Myzus Persicae [Sulzer]), (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Controlling Laboratory Condiditon - 413

    (Myzus Persicae [Sulzer]), (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Controlling Laboratory Condiditon - 413

    Kılıç: An evaluation of some entomopathogenic fungi for green peach aphid (Myzus persicae [Sulzer]), (Homoptera: Aphididae) in controlling laboratory condiditon - 413 - AN EVALUATION OF SOME ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI FOR GREEN PEACH APHID (MYZUS PERSICAE [SULZER]), (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) UNDER LABORATORY CONDITONS KILIÇ, E. Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +90-507-587-7012) (Received 28th Apr 2020; accepted 20th Aug 2020) Abstract. This study was carried out between 2014 and 2017 in Erzincan province Turkey. Our aim was to test pathogenesis of soil isolated entomopathogenic fungi from Erzincan and the Myzus persicae (Sulzer), (Homoptera: Aphididae). A total of 78 entomopathogenic fungi isolates including 63 Beauveria bassiana and 15 Metarhizium anisopliae were obtained. Our study was followed by incubation for 12 days and the first cases were seen on the third day. It was recorded that B. bassiana isolates caused the highest mortality rate on the 3rd day (BbEMRKZ2a, 10.50%); 5th day (BbEMRKZ5b and BbEÜ3, 22.39%); 7th day (MaEM3i, 45.71); 9th day (BbEMRKZ1a and BbER4, 50.00%), and after 12 days (BbEİ5, 62.54%). Also, it was recorded that M. anisopliae isolates caused the highest mortality rate on the 3rd day (MaEMR1a, 5.78%), 5th day (MaET3, 23.32%), 7th day (BbER4, 37.4%), 9th day (MaEİ3 50.84%), and after 12 days (MaET3, 60.01%). In the control group, the highest mortality rate was 1.12% at the end of the incubation period. Keywords: biocontrol, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Myzus persicae Introduction Aphids are one of the most destructive pests in agricultural production.
  • Erzincan Ili 2019 Yili Çevre Durum Raporu

    Erzincan Ili 2019 Yili Çevre Durum Raporu

    ERZİNCAN 2019 ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ERZİNCAN VALİLİĞİ ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ERZİNCAN İLİ 2019 YILI ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU HAZIRLAYAN: Ezgi Nazan TOPAL Çevre Mühendisi ERZİNCAN - 2020 i ERZİNCAN 2019 ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU ÖNSÖZ Çevre, belli bir yaşam ortamında canlıların hayatı üzerinde etkili olan fiziksel, kimyasal ve biyolojik faktörlerin bütünlüğüdür. Diğer bir değişle çevre bir canlının olduğu ortam ya da şartlardır ve yeryüzünde ilk canlı ile birlikte var olmuştur. Yani çevrenin temelindeki odak noktasında insan oturmaktadır. Çevre ve çevrecilik olgusu, 20. Yüzyılın sonlarına doğru kirlenen dünyamızda olduğu gibi ülkemizde de gündemin ilk sırasını işgal etmektedir. Çevre olgusunun her geçen gün artması, ülkemiz açısından sevindirici bir durumdur. Anayasamızın 56. maddesinde “Herkes sağlıklı ve dengeli bir çevrede yaşama hakkına sahiptir. Çevreyi geliştirmek, çevre sağlığını korumak ve çevre kirlenmesini önlemek Devletin ve vatandaşın ödevidir.” denilmekle devlet ve vatandaşlarımıza önemli sorumluluklar yüklemektedir. Ülkemizde ve dünyada bugün ortaya çıkan çevre sorunlarının ana nedenlerinden birisi insanların yaşadığı dünyayı, kendisinden sonra başkalarının da kullanacağını düşünmemesidir. Hâlbuki yaşanılır bir dünya bize emanet edilen gelecek nesillere devredilmesi gereken en önemli varlıktır. İçinde bulunduğumuz yüzyıl, birçok teknolojik imkânları insanlığın hizmetine sunarken, bir yandan da geri dönüşü zor hatta imkânsız olan varlıkları da alıp götürmektedir. Çevre kirliliğinin artmasında nüfus artışı faktörünün
  • Geothermal Country Update Report of Turkey (2005-2010)

    Geothermal Country Update Report of Turkey (2005-2010)

    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010 Bali, Indonesia, 25-29 April 2010 Geothermal Country Update Report of Turkey (2005-2010) Orhan Mertoglu*, Sakir Simsek**, Hayrullah Dagistan***, Nilgun Bakir*, Nilgun Dogdu*** * Turkish Geothermal Association. – Ankara, [email protected] **Hacettepe University, Eng. Faculty, Geological (Hydrogeological) Eng.Dept. Beytepe, Ankara, [email protected] *** General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) – 06520, Ankara, [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Turkey, geothermal update, exploration, temperatures and the flow rates of thermal resources in utization, electricity, direct use, heat pump geothermal fields have been increased very seriously (MTA, 2005, Dagistan, 2009). These manifestations are located ABSTRACT mainly along the major grabens in Western Anatolia, along the Northern Anatolian Fault Zone, Central and Eastern Turkey is located on the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt, Anatolia volcanic regions (Figure 1). With the existing which has high geothermal potential. The first geothermal springs (600MWt) and geothermal wells (3478 MWt), the research and investigations in Turkey were started by MTA proven geothermal capacity calculated by MTA is 4078 in the 1960s. From this time, 186 geothermal fields have MWt (discharge temperature is assumed to be 35°C). The been discovered by MTA, where 95% of them are low- distribution of geothermal direct use in Turkey (August medium enthalpy fields, which are suitable mostly for 2009) is shown in Figure 2. The geothermal potential is direct-use applications. Around 1500 hot and mineralised estimated as 31,500 MWt. The installed geothermal heat natural springs and wells exist in Turkey. With the existing capacity is 2084 MWt for direct-use and 81.61 MWe for geothermal wells and spring discharge water, the proven power production in Turkey, where a liquid carbon dioxide geothermal capacity calculated by MTA is totally 4078 MWt and dry ice production factory is integrated to the Kizildere (exhaust temperature is assumed to be 35°C).
  • Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey)

    Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey)

    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol.Z. ÖZCAN 21, 2012, ET pp. AL. 933–960. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-1102-8 First published online 25 April 2011 Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey) ZAHİDE ÖZCAN1, ARAL I. OKAY1,2, ERCAN ÖZCAN2, AYNUR HAKYEMEZ3 & SEVİNÇ ÖZKAN-ALTINER4 1 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey 3 General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA Genel Müdürlüğü), Geological Research Department, TR−06520 Ankara, Turkey 4 Middle East Technical University (METU), Department of Geological Engineering, Ünversiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupınar Bulvarı No. 1, TR−06800 Ankara, Turkey Received 17 February 2011; revised typescript receipt 04 April 2011; accepted 25 April 2011 Abstract: Th e Late Cretaceous–Eocene geological evolution of northwest Turkey between the Black Sea and Bursa was studied through detailed biostratigraphic characterization of eleven stratigraphic sections. Th e Upper Cretaceous sequence in the region starts with a major marine transgression and lies unconformably on a basement of Palaeozoic and Triassic rocks in the north (İstanbul-type basement) and on metamorphic rocks and Jurassic sedimentary rocks in the south (Sakarya-type basement). Four megasequences have been diff erentiated in the Late Cretaceous–Eocene interval. Th e fi rst one, of Turonian to Late Campanian age, is represented by volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks in the north along the Black Sea coast, and by siliciclastic turbidites and intercalated calcarenites in the south, corresponding to magmatic arc basin and fore-arc basin, respectively.
  • Geothermal Application Experiences in Turkey

    Geothermal Application Experiences in Turkey

    GEOTHERMAL APPLICATION EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY Orhan Mertoglu, Nilgun Bakir, Tevfik Kaya ORME Jeotermal A.S., Ankara/Turkey; Hosdere Cad. 190/7-8-12,Cankaya, [email protected] Keywords: Turkey, geothermal heating, balneology, electricity, mineral recovery Abstract Utilization area of geothermal energy is mostly focussed on direct use applications in Turkey. Today 61.000 residences equivalence is being heated geothermally (665 MWt, including residences, thermal facilities, 565.000 m2 greenhouse heating). Moreover, with the balneological utilisation of geothermal fluids in 195 spa’s (327 MWt), the geothermal direct use capacity is 992 MWt. ORME Geothermal Inc has completed the engineering designs of nearly 300.000 residences equivalence geothermal district heating system. 170 geothermal fields (Figure 1) have been explored in Turkey. There is a single flash power plant with 20,4 MWe installed capacity. A liquid CO2 and dry ice production factory is integrated to this power plant. A binary cycle geothermal power plant with an installation capacity of 25 MWe is going to be constructed at Aydin/Germencik. The proven geothermal heat capacity according to the existing geothermal wells and natural discharges is 3132 MWt [1]. 1. INTRODUCTION There are 11 city based geothermal district heating systems in Turkey. These geothermal district heating systems have been constructed since 1987 and many development has been achieved in technical and economical aspects. The rapid development of geothermal district heating systems in Turkey is mostly depending on; - construction of suitable geothermal district heating systems according to Turkey’s conditions, - participation of the consumers to the geothermal district heating investments by about 50 % without any direct financing refund, - geothermal heating is about % 50-70 cheaper than natural gas heating.
  • Empirical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) and Penetration Resistance (SPT-N) for Different Soils in an Earthquake-Prone Area (Erbaa-Turkey)

    Empirical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) and Penetration Resistance (SPT-N) for Different Soils in an Earthquake-Prone Area (Erbaa-Turkey)

    Engineering Geology 119 (2011) 1–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Engineering Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enggeo Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance (SPT-N) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey) Muge K. Akin a,⁎, Steven L. Kramer b, Tamer Topal c a Dept. of Geological Engineering, Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey b Dept.of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, USA c Dept. of Geological Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey article info abstract Article history: The seismicity of the northern part of Turkey is mainly controlled by the North Anatolian Fault zone (NAFZ). Received 17 August 2010 The NAFZ is one of the world's most active seismic zones, and has produced destructive earthquakes and Received in revised form 17 January 2011 related hazards in the northern region of Turkey. Several earthquakes and earthquake-related hazards have Accepted 24 January 2011 occurred along different segments of this fault zone in the recent past. The study area, Erbaa town, is located Available online 2 February 2011 along the eastern segment of North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) and is one of the largest towns of Tokat Province in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. The center of Erbaa is located on the left embankment of Keywords: SPT-based uphole the Kelkit River. After the disastrous 1942 (Ms =7.2) and 1943 (Ms =7.6) earthquakes, the settlement was Shear wave velocity shifted southwards. SPT-N As a part of a seismic microzonation study of the Erbaa area, shear wave velocity (Vs) values of the geological Erbaa units exposed in this area were required for site response analyses.
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000

    Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000

    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
  • Palaeoearthquakes on the Kelkit Valley Segment of the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey

    Palaeoearthquakes on the Kelkit Valley Segment of the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey

    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol.C. ZABCI20, 2011, ET pp. AL. 411–427. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-0910-48 First published online 14 June 2010 Palaeoearthquakes on the Kelkit Valley Segment of the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey: Implications for the Surface Rupture of the Historical 17 August 1668 Anatolian Earthquake CENGİZ ZABCI1,*, HÜSNÜ SERDAR AKYÜZ1, VOLKAN KARABACAK2, TAYLAN SANÇAR3,4, ERHAN ALTUNEL2, HALİL GÜRSOY5 & ORHAN TATAR5 1 İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Ayazağa Yerleşkesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, TR−26040 Eskişehir, Turkey 3 İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Ayazağa Yerleşkesi, Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey 4 Tunceli Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, TR−62000 Tunceli, Turkey 5 Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, TR−58140 Sivas, Turkey Received 02 November 2009; revised typescript receipts 20 May 2010; accepted 14 June 2010 Abstract: Th e 26 December 1939 Erzincan (Ms= 7.8) and 20 December 1942 Erbaa-Niksar (Ms= 7.1) earthquakes created a total surface rupture more than 400 km between Erzincan and Erbaa on the middle to eastern sections of the North Anatolian Fault. Th ese two faulting events are separated by a 10-km-wide releasing stepover, which acted like a seismic barrier in the 20th century. To understand the rupture behaviour in this structurally complex section of the North Anatolian Fault, we undertook palaeoseismological trench investigations on the Kelkit Valley segment where there is little or no palaeoseismic information. We found evidence for three surface faulting earthquakes predating the 1939 event during the past millennium in trenches excavated in Reşadiye and Umurca.
  • Çorum Yöresinde Insanlar Üzerinde Parazitlenen Kenelerde Riketsiya Varlığının Araştırılması

    Çorum Yöresinde Insanlar Üzerinde Parazitlenen Kenelerde Riketsiya Varlığının Araştırılması

    Araştırma Makalesi/Original Article Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi Makale Dili “Türkçe”/Article Language “Turkish” Çorum yöresinde insanlar üzerinde parazitlenen kenelerde riketsiya varlığının araştırılması Investigation of the presence of rickettsiae in ticks parasitizing on humans in Çorum region Ahmet BURSALI1, Adem KESKIN1, Aysun KESKIN1, Tuğba KUL-KÖPRÜLÜ1, Şaban TEKIN2 ÖZET ABSTRACT Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Çorum yöresinde insanlarda Objective: The aim of this study is to determine parazitlenen kenelerde riketsiya varlığının Polimeraz the rickettsiae in ticks collected on human in Çorum Zincir Reaksiyonu (PZR) yöntemiyle araştırılması Province by using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). amaçlanmıştır. Methods: A total of 1010 tick samples which were Yöntem: Çorum yöresinde insanlar üzerinden collected on humans identified to species level in toplanan 1.010 adet kene toplanarak morfolojik terms of the morphological characters. Total DNA’s karakterlerine göre tür teşhisleri yapılmıştır. Bu individually extracted from ticks were screened for the örneklerden bireysel olarak elde edilen total DNA’lar presence of Spotted Fever Group rickettsiae using the riketsiyal sitrat sentaz (gltA, 381 bp) ve dış membran PCR targeting rickettsial citrate synthase (gltA, 381 bp) protein A (ompA, 532 bp) gen bölgelerini hedefleyen and outer membrane protein (ompA, 532 bp) genes. primer setleri kullanılarak PZR yöntemi ile taranmıştır. Results: Out of 741 Hyalomma marginatum ticks Bulgular: Çorum ilinde insanlar üzerinden collected from humans in Çorum Province, 51 (6.88%) toplanan 741 Hyalomma marginatum örneğinin 51 were infected Rickettsia aeschlimannii, 3 (0.4%) were (%6,88)’inde Rickettsia aeschlimannii, 3 (%0,4)’ünde infected Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae. Out Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae; 32 Dermacentor of 32 Dermacentor marginatus ticks, 3 (9.4%) were marginatus örneğinin 3 (%9,4)’ünde Rickettsia infected Rickettsia raoultii and 3 (9.4%) were infected raoultii, 3 (%9,4)’ünde Rickettsia slovaca varlığı tespit Rickettsia slovaca.