DOCSLIB.ORG

MEMORANDUM Ecological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MEMORANDUM Ecological Assessment MEMORANDUM TO Evan Aldridge DATE 22 March 2017 CC Aaron Lenden FROM Mervyn Mason PROJECT No. 1656658-003-Rev3 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS OF AN ECOLOGICAL SURVEY AND PROTECTED PLANT SURVEY – YAROOMBA BEACH Ecological survey and reporting was completed for the Yaroomba Beach site to add to the existing body of ecological knowledge collected over the last few years. The surveys and reporting were also conducted to ensure that the current ecological knowledge meets the requirements of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014, and updated and current Queensland legislation (in particular, the Nature Conservation Act 1992, Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation 2006, and the associated Protected Plants Framework and the Flora Survey Guidelines). Both of these were updated since the previous ecological assessments were completed for the site. Ecological Assessment An ecological survey, in line with the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme’s (2014) requirements, was conducted on 15 September 2016, and from 14 to 18 November 2016. The survey was timed to coincide with an optimal time when most species targeted were expected to have identifiable characteristics, such as flowers and foliage, for plants, or exhibited active breeding, in the case of amphibians. Findings As previously reported, and confirmed by the recent surveys: . The site supports regulated vegetation in the form of least concern Regional Ecosystems (RE). Remnant vegetation on site has been impacted by previous clearing and potential changes to the natural hydrological regime. Habitat values range from low, in areas that were previously cleared for the historical golf course, to moderate, in areas of retained native vegetation. Very little old-growth vegetation, and no hollow-bearing trees were recorded on the site. The existing waterbodies hold limited values for aquatic fauna. The site supports mapped essential habitat for Wallum Froglet (Crinia tinnula) and Freycinet’s Frog (Litoria freycinetii). Although the onsite waterbodies and surrounding vegetation support breeding places for least concern frog species, these habitats are not suitable as breeding habitat for Wallum Froglets and Freycinet’s Frog – the triggers for the essential habitat mapping. Ground-truthing indicates that the Queensland State Koala Habitat Mapping is erroneous in some areas, in that the site does not support vegetation that meets the definition of Koala bushland. − The site is largely mapped as low-value bushland under the South East Queensland Koala Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions (KCSPRP). This mapping is incorrect, and the site should be mapped as “low value rehabilitation”. Date: 22 March 2017 Project No. 1656658-003-Rev3 To: Evan Aldridge 1/6 MEMORANDUM − Integrated Development Assessment System (IDAS) form 34 will form part of the development application. − Under Division 9 of the KCSPRP, a request will be made to council to make a determination of the classification of the land, and change the mapping. One individual of the Richmond Birdwing Vine (Pararistolochia praevenosa), listed as Near Threatened under the Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006, was detected within the site. An Impact Management Plan (IMP) for this species will be developed to accompany a Clearing Permit Application, after development approval has been granted. Given the confirmed presence of Richmond Birdwing Vine on the site, and adjacent to the site, there is potential for the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia), listed as Vulnerable under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006, to occur within the area. No other threatened species were recorded within or adjacent to the site. The Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme’s Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay identifies the site as containing native vegetation, wetlands, constructed waterbody, and coastal protection areas. Potential Impacts No significant impacts are expected to Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) as a result of the proposed development of the site. A separate report assesses impacts to marine turtles. One specimen of the Richmond Birdwing Vine could be directly impacted by clearing of the site. This is discussed below, under Protected Plants. It is expected that measures proposed to manage impacts upon Richmond Birdwing Vine (as part of an Impact Management Plan, see below) would effectively manage any potential impacts on Richmond Birdwing Butterflies. No significant impacts on any other listed threatened species, or special least concern species, are expected as a result of the proposed development. Implications The clearing of vegetation on the site is within an urban area for an urban purpose. Therefore, the clearing of least concern REs, and the associated essential habitat, is exempt from assessment under the Queensland Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VM Act). Nevertheless, advice from the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) suggests that, because lot 15 SP238214 is greater than 5 ha in area, and contains category B native vegetation shown on the regulated vegetation management map, an MCU where preliminary approval is sought under Section 242 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) would trigger referral under Schedule 7, Table 3 Item 10 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009. Given that development approvals are already in place for the site, clearing is allowed under the exemption provisions of Schedule 24, Parts 1 and 2 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009. However, a revised development proposal is being considered, and, as such, a preliminary assessment of the clearing of the vegetation against Module 8: Vegetation Clearing of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) indicates that: Date: 22 March 2017 Project No. 1656658-003-Rev3 To: Evan Aldridge 2/6 MEMORANDUM . Table 8.1.3 Performance Outcome 1 – The revised development proposal for the site has undertaken all reasonable steps to avoid the clearing of remnant vegetation, and/or minimised the need to clear remnant vegetation, thereby retaining as much of the original vegetation as is reasonably practical. Table 8.1.3 Performance Outcome 2 – The remnant vegetation on the site is not in a declared area, exchange area, unlawfully cleared area, under a restoration notice, under an enforcement notice, under a compliance notice, under a Land Act notice, under a trespass notice, nor is the area shown as category A vegetation on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV). Table 8.1.3 Performance Outcome 3 – The site is not part of an existing environmental offset area. Table 8.1.3 Performance Outcome 5 – All the clearing will be limited to clearing that could be done under an exemption for the purpose of the development. The preparation of a Property Vegetation Management Plan (PVMP), as defined under the VM Act Schedule, pursuant to Schedule 7, Table 3 Item 10 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, may be required. The PVMP would include the matters specified in Section 11 of the Vegetation Management Regulation 2012. As mentioned, a Division 9 application under the KSPRP, to request Sunshine Coast Council to change the state mapping is warranted. This would remove the need to offset the removal of any non-juvenile Koala habitat trees, if successful. Integrated Development Assessment System (IDAS) form 34 will form part of the development application, as part of the Division 9 application. Given the site and surrounds are unlikely to support important breeding habitat for threatened species, special least concern and/or colonial breeding species, the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection’s (DEHP) Species Management Programme (SMP) “low risk of impacts” (as promulgated under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation 2006) will apply if any tampering with animal breeding places is required as part of the proposed development. However, it is recommended that a pre-clearing survey is undertaken to confirm the presence/absence of any breeding places for threatened species, special least concern and/or colonial breeding species, to confirm if the SMP “high risk of impacts” could apply. Development of the site will be assessed against the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code (the code) of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme. Under the code’s Policy (that is, SC6.6), the Sunshine Coast Regional Council may require an offset for the clearing of mapped vegetation, and any draining/filling of the mapped waterbodies on the site. Under the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme’s offsets policy, an offset can be in the form of a land-based biodiversity offset, or as an in lieu financial contribution. For development proposing land-based biodiversity offsets, an ecological assessment of the receiving site is also to be provided in accordance with the planning scheme policy for biodiversity offsets. Protected Plants The site is mapped as occurring within a high-risk Protected Plants Trigger Area, as per the DEHP’s mapping. Therefore, a survey for protected plants, that is, endangered, vulnerable, and near threatened species listed under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation 2006 and the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), was required. Date: 22 March 2017 Project No. 1656658-003-Rev3 To: Evan Aldridge 3/6 MEMORANDUM That survey needed to meet the intent of the Queensland Flora Survey Guidelines – Protected Plants (the guidelines). Findings Protected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB
    MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy, Lyndley A. Craven and John C. Doran MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales Lyndley A. Craven Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO Plant Industry John C. Doran Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO Plant Industry 2013 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. ACIAR operates as part of Australia's international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia. It commissions collaborative research between Australian and developing-country researchers in areas where Australia has special research competence. It also administers Australia's contribution to the International Agricultural Research Centres. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by ACIAR. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research and development objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected] Brophy J.J., Craven L.A. and Doran J.C. 2013. Melaleucas: their botany, essential oils and uses. ACIAR Monograph No. 156. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore
    Sunshine Coast Council Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore. Environmental Operations May 2013 0 | Page Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Flying-fox Mitigation Strategies .......................................................................................................... 2 State and Federal Permits ................................................................................................................... 4 Roost Management Plan .................................................................................................................... 4 Risk ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Flying-fox Dispersal Success in Australia ............................................................................................. 6 References .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Cassia Wildlife Corridor ................................................................................................................ 8 Background ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report
    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report November 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Project Study Area 2 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Background and Approach 4 2.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer Study Area 4 2.3 Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 5 2.4 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 5 2.5 PER Guidelines 5 2.6 Desktop and Database Assessments 7 3. Database Searches and Survey Results 11 3.1 Information Sources 11 3.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 11 3.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 18 3.4 Pest Species 22 3.5 Vegetation Communities 24 3.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 28 3.7 Aquatic Values 31 3.8 World Heritage Values 53 3.9 Results of Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 54 4. References 61 Table Index Table 1: Summary of NES Matters Protected under Part 3 of the EPBC Act 5 Table 2 Summary of World Heritage Values within/adjacent Aquifer Area of Influence 6 Table 3: Species of NES Identified as Occurring within the Study Area 11 Table 4: Summary of Regional Ecosystems and Groundwater Dependencies 26 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report Table 5: Freshwater Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 36 Table 6: Estuarine Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 50 Table 7: Description of potential borehole field in Aloomba as of 20th August, 2009. 55 Figure Index Figure 1: Regional Ecosystem Conservation Status and Protected Species Observation 21 Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Groundwater Dependencies 30 Figure 3: Locations of Study Sites 54 Appendices A Database Searches 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACTS of the UNPRECEDENTED 2019-20 BUSHFIRES on AUSTRALIAN ANIMALS NOVEMBER 2020 Acknowledgements
    AUSTRALIA IMPACTS OF THE UNPRECEDENTED 2019-20 BUSHFIRES ON AUSTRALIAN ANIMALS NOVEMBER 2020 Acknowledgements WWF-Australia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land on which we work and their continuing connection to their lands, waters, and culture. We pay our respects to Elders – past and present, and their emerging leaders. WWF-Australia is part of the world’s largest conservation network. WWF-Australia has been working to create a world where people live in harmony with nature since 1978. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the Earth’s CONTENTS natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. Prepared by Lily M van Eeden, Dale Nimmo, Michael BACKGROUND 10 Mahony, Kerryn Herman, Glenn Ehmke, Joris Driessen, James O’Connor, Gilad Bino, Martin Taylor and Chris 1.1 Fire in Australia 10 Dickman for WWF-Australia 1.2 The 2019-20 bushfire season 10 We are grateful to the researchers who provided data or feedback on the report. These include: 1.3 Scope of this study 12 • Eddy Cannella 1.3.1 Taxa included 14 • David Chapple 1.3.2 Study area 14 • Hugh Davies • Deanna Duffy 1.4 Limitations 17 • Hugh Ford • Chris Johnson 1. MAMMALS 18 • Brad Law 2.1 Methods 18 • Sarah Legge • David Lindenmayer 2.1.1 Most mammals 18 • Simon McDonald 2.1.2 Koalas 19 • Damian Michael 2.2 Results 22 • Harry Moore • Stewart Nichol 2.3 Caveats 22 • Alyson Stobo-Wilson • Reid Tingley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Protected Matters Report
    EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 02/04/15 15:16:08 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 5.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: 1 National Heritage Places: 1 Wetlands of International Importance: None Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: 3 Commonwealth Marine Area: None Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 2 Listed Threatened Species: 14 Listed Migratory Species: 24 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Seahorses and Other Syngnathids in Countries Outside Asia (1998-2001)
    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2011 Volume 19 Number 1 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) 1 Edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 181 pages © published 2011 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 1 Cite as: Vincent, A.C.J., Giles, B.G., Czembor, C.A., and Foster, S.J. (eds). 2011. Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1). Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia [ISSN 1198-6727]. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 2011 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster CONTENTS DIRECTOR ’S FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Predation by Introduced Cats Felis Catus on Australian Frogs: Compilation of Species Records and Estimation of Numbers Killed
    Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed J. C. Z. WoinarskiA,M, S. M. LeggeB,C, L. A. WoolleyA,L, R. PalmerD, C. R. DickmanE, J. AugusteynF, T. S. DohertyG, G. EdwardsH, H. GeyleA, H. McGregorI, J. RileyJ, J. TurpinK and B. P. MurphyA ANESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. BNESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of the Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. DWestern Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. ENESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, Qld 4701, Australia. GCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia. HNorthern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. INESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. JSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. KDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. LPresent address: WWF-Australia, 3 Broome Lotteries House, Cable Beach Road, Broome, WA 6276, Australia. MCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Data sources used in compilation of cat predation on frogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants Sunshine Coast
    1 Native Plants Sunshine Coast [email protected] Native Plants Queensland Newsletter AUGUST 2015 Number 3 OFFICE BEARERS…. Anne Windsor Chair 5491 5868 [email protected] Marie Livingstone Hon Secretary 5494 9187 [email protected] Joan Abercrombie Hon Treasurer 5496 5013 [email protected] COMING EVENTS 2015 AUGUST Saturday 15 and Sunday 16 Native Flower Show and Plant Market BG Mt Coot-th-a. Sunshine Coast Wildflower Festival 18-30 August. A copy of the full program is available on our AUGUST Tuesday 18 – 30 August website www.npqsuncoast.org and is also on the Sunshine Coast Council web site. The popular walks get booked early so don't miss out! Bookings information is listed with each walk. There will also be printed copies of the program available on our August 9 outing to Emu Mt. SEPTEMBER Saturday 5 Rosewood Festival plant sale SEPTEMBER Saturday 6 Bushland Vibes NOVEMBER Sunday 15 – 20TH ANPSA Conference Canberra Website anpsa.org.au NOVEMBER Saturday 28 Mapleton Community Library fair 8.00AM – 1.00PM and plant sale. Sunshine Coast will have a Plant Sale at the Mapleton Fair. 2 Information about outings contact…. Marie 0427 152 022 Chrissie 0408 792 227 Gretchen 0400 772 602 Extra information re Plant sales and flower show August 15 and 16. Sunshine Coast will be combining with Bush Foods Queensland for a display highlighting the diversity of food available from native plants. Sunshine Coast will also be selling an amazing array of plants. For many months a group of dedicated workers have been selecting and preparing plants at David Hockings' nursery.
    [Show full text]