DOCSLIB.ORG

Revisiting Reykjavik Revisited the 25Th Anniversary of a Remarkable Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revisiting Reykjavik Revisited the 25Th Anniversary of a Remarkable Meeting Revisiting Reykjavik Revisited The 25th Anniversary of a Remarkable Meeting by RiChard rhodes PuliZTer-PriZe winner This year, 2011, marks the 25th and arms negotiator Max Kampelman by former Secretaries of State George anniversary of the astonishing meeting and Stanford University physicist Shultz and Henry Kissinger, former in Reykjavik, Iceland, in October 1986 and longstanding government adviser Secretary of Defense William Perry and between Soviet General Secretary Sidney Drell, discovered a common and former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn. Mikhail Gorbachev and U.S. President urgent concern with renewed nuclear Ronald Reagan. That meeting very peril. In particular, terrorist attacks by “Nuclear weapons today present nearly led to an agreement to begin the a sub-national group, al Qaeda, had tremendous dangers, but also an historic process of eliminating nuclear weapons raised the spectre of nuclear terrorism opportunity,” the editorial began. from the world. Ultimately the two undeterred by the threat of nuclear “U.S. leadership will be required to leaders were unable to agree, but both retaliation. There was uncertainty as take the world to the next stage—to a understood their negotiations to have well about how long the grand bargain solid consensus for reversing reliance been uniquely fruitful, as indeed they of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation on nuclear weapons globally as a were. “Seen by many as a failure,” Treaty would hold when the nuclear vital contribution to preventing their Gorbachev wrote later, the Reykjavik powers continued to shirk their proliferation into potentially dangerous Summit “actually gave an impetus to commitment to the non-nuclear hands, and ultimately ending them as a reduction by reaffirming the vision of powers to move expeditiously toward threat to the world.” a world without nuclear weapons and nuclear disarmament. Shultz, Drell and by paving the way toward concrete Kampelman invited other former U.S. In a list of steps that would lay agreements on intermediate-range government officials to participate in their the groundwork for a world free of nuclear forces and strategic nuclear new initiative, and many responded. the nuclear threat, the statesmen also weapons.” The two-day meeting highlighted the importance of U.S. signalled as well the beginning of the Calling for a nuClear- ratification of the Comprehensive end of the Cold War. weaPon-free world Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) by: “Initiating a bipartisan process with Two decades later in 2006, with little Out of that effort came a conference, the Senate, including understandings movement toward nuclear elimination held at the Hoover Institution in to increase confidence and provide for in the intervening years, a core group Stanford, California, on the 20th periodic review, to achieve ratification of of American statesmen determined anniversary of the Reykjavik Summit. the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, taking to renew and advance the Reykjavik The findings of that conference were advantage of recent technical advances, vision. Former Reagan Secretary of summarized in an editorial in the Wall and working to secure ratification by State George Shultz, U.S. Ambassador Street Journal on 4 January 2007, signed other key states.” 20 CTBTO SPECTRUM 17 | SEPTEMBER 2011 President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev at the Reykjavik Summit, October 1986. Other editorials followed, along with the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral building a safer world concerted efforts by the four signatories William Crowe, former U.S. Ambassador for our Children to carry the message of urgency and arms negotiator Thomas Graham, to presidents and prime ministers Jr., historian Don Oberdorfer, physicist I wondered if there were other reasons throughout the world. In a joint op-ed Roald Sagdeev, U.S. National Security besides the threat of undeterrable published in The Wall Street Journal on Council non-proliferation expert Rose nuclear terrorism that had changed their 15 January 2008, the statesmen renewed Gottemoeller and many others. minds. As the opportunity arose during their call for a nuclear-weapon-free and after the conferences, I asked some world by supporting, among other I was surprised to hear Henry of them. The most common reason, I measures, the adoption of a process Kissinger acknowledge, at the end of the learned, was that the end of the Cold for bringing the CTBT into effect “… second conference, in a tone that seemed War and the dissolution of the Soviet which would strengthen the Nuclear more than pro forma, that he had learned Union had removed the threat of conflict Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a great deal across its two days: so had I. I with what had been a hostile nuclear aid international monitoring of nuclear was not surprised to see that former U.S. power. (Many Americans today believe activities.” Their friends dubbed them Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard that the United States has already “the Four Horsemen,” though they rode Perle, a prominent neoconservative eliminated its nuclear arsenal. That belief to oppose the apocalypse, not to deliver who had consistently worked to oppose is perhaps ill-informed, but it accurately it. Their work continues today, with nuclear disarmament, attended the first reflects an intuitive sense that the U.S. committed support from many national conference but not the second. nuclear arsenal’s primary purpose was to leaders including American President deter the U.S.S.R. from nuclear use, and Barack Obama. Many of the participants in the two vice versa. Russia clearly does not stand conferences had opposed moving toward in the same relationship to the United moVing beyond eliminating nuclear weapons during their States as the former Soviet Union did.) The Cold war active careers in government. Partly that was because their government service fell Some of those I spoke with As an historian affiliated with Stanford within the Cold War years, when both mentioned the great expense of University who has written at length the United States and the Soviet Union maintaining a nuclear arsenal, although about the development and international believed that their vast nuclear arsenals the American military has argued that politics of nuclear weapons, I had the protected them from nuclear attack. meeting the same objectives with privilege of attending both the October Partly the participants had served at the conventional forces will cost more 2006 conference and a second conference convenience of presidents who had been in annual appropriations than the held at Stanford University the following committed to maintaining large nuclear nuclear arsenal does. The argument year. It was encouraging to watch arsenals and had properly represented is questionable, since it’s difficult to and hear a small crowd of statesmen, their superiors' views. Partly as well they imagine any military objective for scientists and specialists debate the deep had understood the darker truth that which the United States—or any other problem of the continued existence of nuclear weapons had served to embody major nuclear power—would violate nuclear weapons in the world—men national prestige and to communicate the taboo that has held fast against and women such as former chairman of unmistakable national strength. nuclear use since 1945. The former French Consulate, the Höfði House, site of the Reykjavik Summit. Caption 21 CTBTO SPECTRUM 17 | SEPTEMBER 2011 President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev in front of the Höfði House, Reykjavik, Iceland, October 1986 the power of moral values embodied in the goals nations and communities of nations set for themselves. “Indeed,” Soviet Union on nuclear and space arms he said, “we in the U.S. understood the in Geneva from 1985 to 1989, coincident power of the ‘ought’ at a time when our with the Reykjavik Summit. Kampelman very existence as a nation was at stake. told me he helped initiate the Reykjavik Our founders established the Declaration Revisited project in 2006 because he was of Independence and our Constitution as worried about the security of the world clear goals for our nation—goals we have that his children and grandchildren would continually been working to achieve. inherit. He told me that with tears in his And they established these ‘oughts’ of eyes. I took him at his word. independence, freedom, and liberty in an atmosphere of slavery, second-class The ‘oughT’ of citizenship for women, and property sTabiliTy and PeaCe qualifications for voting. .The power of the ‘ought’ is great, warrants respect, It’s one thing to represent a government. and should not be minimized. Today, a It’s another to contemplate personally central theme of American foreign policy your responsibility for the world must be to move the ‘is’ of our present you have helped make. Kampelman global nuclear peril to a more hopeful understood that nuclear disarmament ‘ought’ of stability and peace. We must was a difficult challenge, perhaps the not minimize the pursuit of the ‘ought.’ most difficult challenge the international Our role must be to establish a civilized community has ever faced. As he said ‘ought’ for the human race. The abolition at the opening of the conference at of weapons of mass destruction now Stanford in 2007, he found inspiration must be central to that objective.” to pursue meeting that challenge in a surprising place. He had taught political Idealism is often dismissed as science before he entered government. impractical, even weak, as a motive A basic text he had used in his teaching force in international affairs. I found was An American Dilemma, the Swedish it hopeful that men and women economist and sociologist Gunnar with long experience of government Myrdal’s monumental 1944 report on service gave concrete expression to the state of race relations in the United the idealism of “ought.” They saw, States. In a word, they were ugly, with and see, the elimination of nuclear apartheid throughout the American South weapons as a goal worth working and a continuing plague of lynchings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture Transcript
    9TH A NNUAL Frank K. Kelly Lecture ON HUMANITY’S FUTURE AMBASSADOR Max Kampelman ZERO NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOR A SANE AND SUSTAINABLE WORLD NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION Working for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons EMPOWERING PEACE LEADERS Strengthening International Law Frank K. Kelly Lecture ON HUMANITY’S FUTURE he Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity’s Future was established by the Nuclear Age Peace TFoundation in 2002. The lecture series honors Frank Kelly, a founder and senior vice president of the Foundation, whose vision and compassion are perpetuated through this ongoing lecture series. Each annual lecture is presented by a distin - guished individual to explore the contours of humanity’s present circumstances and ways by which we can shape a more promising future for our planet and all its inhabitants. Mr. Kelly, for whom the lecture series is named, gave the inaugural lecture in 2002 on “Glorious Beings: What We Are and What We May Become.” The lecture presented in this booklet, “Zero Nuclear Weapons for a Sane and Sustainable World,” is the ninth in the series. It was presented by Ambassador Max Kampelman at Santa Barbara City College on February 25, 2010. The 2009 lecture was presented by Frances Moore Lappé on “Living Democracy, Feeding Hope.” The 2008 lecture was given by Colman McCarthy on “Teach Peace.” The 2007 lecture was delivered by Jakob von Uexküll on “Globalization: Values, Responsibil - ity and Global Justice.” The 2006 lecture was presented by Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Corrigan Maguire on “A Right to Live without Violence, Nuclear Weapons and War.” The 2005 lecture was delivered by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy's Champion: Albert Shanker and The
    DEMOCRACY’S CHAMPION ALBERT SHANKER and the International Impact of the American Federation of Teachers By Eric Chenoweth BOARD OF DIRECTORS Paul E. Almeida Anthony Bryk Barbara Byrd-Bennett Landon Butler David K. Cohen Thomas R. Donahue Han Dongfang Bob Edwards Carl Gershman The Albert Shanker Institute is a nonprofit organization established in 1998 to honor the life and legacy of the late president of the Milton Goldberg American Federation of Teachers. The organization’s by-laws Ernest G. Green commit it to four fundamental principles—vibrant democracy, Linda Darling Hammond quality public education, a voice for working people in decisions E. D. Hirsch, Jr. affecting their jobs and their lives, and free and open debate about Sol Hurwitz all of these issues. John Jackson Clifford B. Janey The institute brings together influential leaders and thinkers from Lorretta Johnson business, labor, government, and education from across the political Susan Moore Johnson spectrum. It sponsors research, promotes discussions, and seeks new Ted Kirsch and workable approaches to the issues that will shape the future of Francine Lawrence democracy, education, and unionism. Many of these conversations Stanley S. Litow are off-the-record, encouraging lively, honest debate and new Michael Maccoby understandings. Herb Magidson Harold Meyerson These efforts are directed by and accountable to a diverse and Mary Cathryn Ricker distinguished board of directors representing the richness of Al Richard Riley Shanker’s commitments and concerns. William Schmidt Randi Weingarten ____________________________________________ Deborah L. Wince-Smith This document was written for the Albert Shanker Institute and does not necessarily represent the views of the institute or the members of its Board EMERITUS BOARD of Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Part Two: Turning the Goal of a World Without Nuclear Weapons Into a Joint Enterprise Max M
    13. Part Two: Turning the Goal of a World without Nuclear Weapons into a Joint Enterprise Max M. Kampelman Steven P. Andreasen Key Judgments ● This paper focuses on two related questions pertaining to the issue of how best to work with leaders of the countries in possession of nuclear weapons to turn the goal of a world without nuclear weapons into a joint enterprise: • What would be the “mechanism” for getting all of the nuclear states together to agree on a program of action such as the steps listed in the Wall Street Journal Op-Ed article? • Would a new mechanism—either formal or informal—be re- quired, or would this best be done through an existing mech- anism, such as the United Nations, perhaps working with other key states? ● The review identified four central issues for analysis: • Issue 1: How can the United States government initiate the process of working with leaders of other nuclear weapon states to turn the goal of a world without nuclear weapons into a joint enterprise? • Issue 2: To what extent does this process need to be proce- durally and substantively “inclusive” (i.e., involve all nuclear weapons states) from the start? 430 Max M. Kampelman and Steven Andreasen • Issue 3: Should the process be centered within existing struc- tures and mechanisms or on a more ad hoc basis? • Issue 4: How much “weight” should be given to the steps at the outset of this process? ● The review identified three options for consideration: • Option 1: A UN-centered process, whereby the UN General Assembly would first pass a resolution calling for the elimi- nation of all weapons of mass destruction, followed by a pro- cess anchored in the Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Kampelman at This Telephone Number; He‘Ll Be at the Bookstore
    Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR MAX M. KAMPELMAN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: June 24, 2003 Copyright 2005 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Ne York City Ne York University, University of Minnesota WWII, non-combatant service Human Starvation Study + volunteer Bennington College, ,ermont- Professor 19.8-19.9 Marriage Washington, D.C. + Assistant to Hubert Humphrey 19.9-1922 Democratic Party McCarthy Americans for Democratic Action 3ADA4 5orean War 6yndon 7ohnson Feli8 Cohen Washington, D.C. + Private la practice 1922-1980 District of Columbia National Bank Relationship ith President 7ohnson City Council Chairmanship offer Hubert Humphrey Politics ,oice of America liberalism Workers Unions liberalism Minnesota labor Washington, D.C + Public activities 1922-196. President, Friends of the National Zoo Chairman, Public Television channel 26 Diplomatic Study organizations 1 Presidential Campaigns 196., 1968 and 1972 6yndon 7ohnson Hubert Humphrey ,ice-President@s Residence ,ietnam ,ice-Presidential candidates McAovern Richard Ni8on 7ack 5ennedy Committee on the Present Danger Presidential Elections 1976 Henry 3Scoop4 7ackson Hubert Humphrey Walter Mondale President 7immy Carter years 1977-1981 Afghanistan Madrid Conference + Chief of Delegation William Scranton Dante Fascell Helsinki Final Act Revie Arthur Aoldberg + Mid-East negotiator Aermans in USSR Soviet 7e s President Reagan Years + US Rep., Arms Reduction Negotiations
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving the Non-Proliferation Regime
    Global Security Institute 866 United Nations Plaza | Suite 4050 | New York, NY 10017 | www.gsinstitute.org | [email protected] POLICY BRIEF Preserving and Strengthening the Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Regime Jonathan Granoff President Prepared for the “Overcoming Nuclear Dangers” conference co-sponsored by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Nuclear Security Project and the World Political Forum, held in Rome, Italy. Special thanks go to GSI Senior Officer Rhianna Tyson for her assistance in preparing this brief. April 2009 Preserving and Strengthening the Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Regime was presented at the conference, “Overcoming Nuclear Dangers,” April 16-17, 2009, Rome, Italy, where more than 75 leaders from around the globe gathered together to engage in a substantive dialogue on the steps that will need to be taken to reduce nuclear dangers and to move to a world free of nuclear weapons. The two-day conference was one of the key global events springing from the op-eds written by George Shultz, Sam Nunn, Henry Kissinger and Bill Perry endorsing the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons and the policies that can move us in that direction. In the year of Italy’s Presidency of the G-8, the conference was co-sponsored by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, along with the Nuclear Security Project (which is managed by the Nuclear Threat Initiative in cooperation with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution), and the World Political Forum. The conference leaders — Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini, former U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz and former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev — released a statement at the conclusion of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • USIP Receives $10 Million for Headquarters Project Great Hall to Be Named for George P
    May/JUne 2007 Inside 3 Shultz Speech 4 USIP On the Ground 7 Public Health Project 9 Fellowship Vol. XIII, No. 1 Program 10 Focus on Iraq United StateS inStitUte of Peace ■ WaShington, d.c. ■ www.usip.org 14 Short Takes 19 Letter from Nigeria USIP Receives $10 Million for Headquarters Project Great Hall to Be Named for George P. Shultz “Chevron’s contribution is an investment in the global peacebuilding efforts of the Institute.” —David O’Reilly “Having the Institute’s Great Hall bear [Shultz’s] name is an honor and a privilege.” —J. Robinson West Chevron CEO David O’Reilly (left); and J. Robinson West, USIP board chair, and Richard Solomon, USIP president, speak at a dinner celebrating Chevron’s contribution to the Institute. he U.S. Institute of on international conflict preven- the Institute’s new headquarters Peace has received a $10 tion, management, and resolution. project comes at a significant million contribution The Institute plans to name the moment…. [The new building] from the Chevron Cor- great hall at the new building the will increase the Institute’s capac- poration to help con- George P. Shultz Great Hall, in ity and our ability to reach out to struct its new permanent honor of the former U.S. secretary the American public and the headquarters at the of state. The theater in the Public world.” northwest corner of the National Education Center will be identi- He continued, “During the last TMall in Washington, D.C. The fied as the Chevron Theater. two decades, we have worked to headquarters will serve as a Speaking at a dinner at which promote skills in international national center of innovation for those plans were announced, Insti- conflict management as an essen- research, education, training, and tute president Richard Solomon tial element of diplomacy and for- policy and program development affirmed, “Chevron’s support for See Chevron, page 2 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillespie, Jacob
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project JACOB GILLESPIE Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: February 4, 2010 Copyright 2016 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Illinois; raised in Illinois and Maryland Dartmouth College Marriage Commissioned USIA Foreign Service Officer, 1961 Edward R. Murrow Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute; French 1962 Accra, Ghana: USIA Rotation Officer 1962-1963 Environment Kwame Nkrumah American Outlook James Baldwin US aid program Ambassador William Mahoney Edgar Kaiser G. Mennen Williams Danquah Scholars of Africa W. E, B. Du Bois French Birth of son Ghanaian hospitality International Visitor Program Corruption British Peace Corps Bujumbura, Burundi: USIS, Assistant Public Affairs Officer 1963-1964 Environment Staff Ethnic groups 1 Government Tutsi refugee camps Communication facilities Elton Stepherson Kennedy assassination University of Butare Chinese officer defection Chinese official presence U.S. media Leopoldville, Republic of the Congo: Field Operations Officer; 1964-1966 Motion Pictures Officer Averill Harriman Consulate personnel hostages in Stanleyville Max Kraus Belgians retake Stanleyville Stanleyville devastation Ambassador Godley Work load Elizabethville Bukavu Environment Rebel activities Mike Hoare’s mercenaries South African mercenaries Motion Picture Distribution Mobutu Internal travels Coquilhatville Fred Hunter Industrial diamonds Exhibits Social life Parc Albert Hank Ryan Films production and distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Nuclear Weapons
    Hoover Press : Drell Shultz hshultz ch8 Mp_97 rev1 page 97 Zero Nuclear Weapons Max M. Kampelman i consider it a privilege to be in your company and I know that we all consider it a privilege to have been invited here by George Shultz and Sidney Drell to note and evaluate the sig- nificance of the Reykjavik Summit twenty years ago between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, both of whom agreed that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.” It is essential, as I rise to address you, that you be aware of my reluctant view that neither of our two national political parties today has demonstrated the capacity to govern our so- ciety in this period of international crisis. I, therefore, turn to this audience of scientists and experts for guidance. It is more than fifty-five years since I took leave from my college teaching to spend three months assisting the newly elected Senator Hubert H. Humphrey of Minnesota to organize his office—and I am still in Washington. During my teaching days, Gunnar Myrdahl published his massive study of the Ne- gro in America. His dominant perception was the realization that wherever he went in our country, he noted a common theme—that of the principles of the Declaration of Indepen- dence. I then asked my students to recall that at the time the Declaration was adopted we had slavery, no legal equality for Ambassador Max Kampelman was Chief U.S. Negotiator to the Conference on Se- curity and Cooperation in Europe 1980–84 and head of the U.S.
    [Show full text]