RTF Report: Annexes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Annexes 216 Roads Task Force Annexes 217 Annex 1 Checking things are on track The RTF expects that TfL and This should be supported by a These example indicators will and public transport, and enabling the boroughs would monitor the programme of research to improve also provide an understanding of people and vehicles to move more performance of London’s streets understanding of road users behaviour, progress towards the three core efficiently on London’s roads. and road network with respect their perceptions and their needs, priorities of the RTF as set out in the to the different functions set and of likely responses to a range preface – delivering better places out as well as progress against of interventions. The following across London, transforming the delivery of the vision overall. table highlights some indicators environment for walking, cycling or areas that should be part of TfL’s monitoring approach. Category Example indicators/areas Principal geographies Category Example indicators/areas Principal geographies Moving • Traffic volume and flow by vehicle type GLA, Functioning • Movement of freight, servicing activity and its efficiency GLA, • Traffic congestion, delays, journey time reliability sub-region, • Parking provision and behaviour sub-regions corridors, • Journey time for some key corridors • Effective management of road and street works specific locations • Use, performance and accessibility of bus services Protecting • Road traffic casualties GLA, • Cycling and pedestrian volumes • Vehicle-related offences and perceptions of aspects sub-regions, • Asset condition of road user behaviour specific locations • Perception of journey experience • Crime and perception of crime Living • Town centre and high street performance indicators GLA, Sustaining • Emissions of greenhouse gases and local air GLA, (eg, footfall) specific locations quality pollutants sub-regions, • Perception of aspects of the urban realm, focusing on • Perceptions of road-related noise specific locations access, accessibility, cohesion, quality and liveability • Mode shares for active travel (walking, cycling) • Valuation of urban realm improvements • Green street index (number of street trees, • Active streets index (eg number of street events pocket parks, etc) through the year) • Perception of quality of local places Unlocking • Road network connectivity GLA, • Match between infrastructure provision specific locations and development needs • Match between infrastructure provision and mode share aspirations • Property values 218 Roads Task Force Annexes 219 Annex 2 Putting street-types into practice This annex looks at each of the It will also, of course, require street-types in terms of their: sustained funding and commitment over the next 20 years to deliver • Functions and users a programme of improvements across the different street-types • Priorities/key service standards and across different parts of London. • Potential mitigations for In practice, there will need to be non-priority users robust assessment of the economic, environmental, safety, social and • The types of intervention/tools other costs/benefits of any proposed that would be appropriate measures in specific locations. Many of the improvements highlighted The most challenging streets and are light touch measures deliverable roads to get the balance right is in a short space of time – but still with where demands for movement and a significant impact. Other changes place are high. For example when an may take more time. Meeting the arterial road ‘meets’ a town centre full aspirations across London for it becomes a high road (if on a the street family will be dependent London-wide corridor) or high street on the more strategic interventions (if on a sub-regional corridor) and discussed in the RTF report. the demands and aspirations around ‘place’ functions and quality of the urban environment increase. The most challenging It is important to reflect the changing streets and roads are function of many streets through those where demands for the day. movement and place are both very high. 220 Roads Task Force Annexes 221 Before After Before After Kingsland It will be important to differentiate area for physical, social and economic growth potential (Vauxhall Nine Elms A city hub transformed Braham High Street between Inner and Outer London regeneration, the streetscape Battersea, Elephant & Castle and at Aldgate Street Park high roads and high streets where improvements at Kingsland High Old Street) and aspirations for dense Braham Street Park was the first the issues and opportunities (and Street support aspirations to help high-quality development, inner-city project completed under the High the types of intervention, for regenerate the local community, lifestyles, urban realm improvements Street 2012 programme which example, parking) may differ given its businesses, and to encourage and high levels of walking and cycling. aimed to improve links between the different mix of modes and further investment and growth. the Olympic Park and the rest of access. And, within Outer London, The improvements incorporate These are the hardest locations London. This scheme is also part of a there will also be variations within widened, decluttered footways and to get the balance right and wider transformation of the Aldgate the parameters reflecting different crossings, re-located bus stops and an clear, early decisions will need gyratory into a two-way system. characteristics and aspirations. interchange that is easy to navigate. to be made about the priorities The redirection of four lanes of traffic, Despite the reduced carriageway and how far changes may go. by reverting Whitechapel High Street The use of many of these roads capacity, traffic signals have been back to a two-way street, freed up in particular may vary through the optimised to cut vehicle congestion. In some places, there may be road space which allowed for the day and week and policies should particular issues associated with the creation of a new park. The park reflect this, making more flexible Where an arterial road ‘meets’ a road layout, for example, gyratories features many of the public’s wishes use of the space available. place of regional, or particularly and ambitions to remove/re-design expressed through extensive high, sub-regional significance – them. The implications of this for public consultation including large Getting the balance right existing or emerging – it becomes wider network functioning need expanses of green space achieved at Kingsland High Street a city hub/boulevard. to be considered, but examples through the use of sloping grass Kingsland High Street is the bustling such as Tottenham Hale show how mounds, hedges, trees, a water local centre for Dalston, east London. Many of these are increasingly this can help ‘rebalance’ areas. feature and Europe’s longest bench. Targeted by Hackney Council as an important areas with significant 222 Roads Task Force Annexes 223 Ingredients Arterial roads Reliable major routes for large volumes of traffic that mitigate the impact on adjacent communities. Functions Priorities 5c Freeing space • Arterials are essential for (key service standards) from motorised business, bringing goods • More reliable vehicular traffic impacts into and out of London journey times 5d Substitute/relocated • They are key to moving • Less congestion capacity large volumes of motorised • Sufficient capacity for traffic, for example the private vehicles and freight busiest parts of the A12 Tools (applied to all cater for more than Providing for other users street-types) 100,000 vehicles a day • Reducing severance by 1a Improved asset with the North Circular providing opportunities management tools exceeding 120,000 to cross the road, 1e Future flexibility 1 Broad landscaped bridge, 5 Improved access, Additional ingredients • Trip lengths vary with potentially via high-quality 1h Cleaner vehicles or roofed over section physical environment • Cluttered and arterial roads catering for bridges/underpasses 3b World-leading of road, incorporating and connectivity to enable unnecessary long-distance as well as • Good parallel routes for real-time traffic pedestrian, cyclist and new development signage removed shorter trips local traffic and cycling management system local vehicular routes, 6 Street trees to assist to reduce severance • Reducing air quality/noise 3e A strong customer focus visual and noise screening of communities Users impacts/more greenery 4c Smart charging 7 Real-time information 2 Separation of buses from • Cars take up more than 4d Smart work centres for motorised traffic other motorised traffic half of the traffic Tools and practices to improve local access 8 Lane rationalisation • Freight takes up the next 1c 21st-century roadworks 4e Next generation travel to public transport and separation of buses biggest share, up to a third 1d Innovative materials demand management to enhance motorised 3 High-quality bus stop • Buses, cyclists and and kit schemes traffic capacity with a large shelter and pedestrians are more likely 3a Optimised traffic signals 4g Parking policy live service information 9 Improved median barriers to cross arterial roads than 3c More dynamic 4h Land use planning 4 Improved landscape travel along them on-street information 5f Connections to setting incorporating 3d Effective incident growth areas separated cycle routes and Challenges management wide footways to improve Congestion during 3f Congestion walking and cycling • access in the