DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 21.04: Zoning Districts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 21.04: Zoning Districts 1 CHAPTER 21.04: ZONING DISTRICTS ..................................................................................106 2 21.04.010 General Provisions .......................................................................................................106 3 A. Districts Established; Zoning Map ............................................................................106 4 B. Relationship to Overlay Districts ..............................................................................107 5 21.04.020 Residential Districts......................................................................................................107 6 A. General Purpose/Intent ............................................................................................107 7 B. R-1: Single-Family Residential District .....................................................................108 8 C. R-1A: Single-Family Residential District (larger lot) ................................................108 9 D. R-2A: Two-Family Residential District (larger lot) ....................................................108 10 E. R-2D: Two-Family Residential District.....................................................................109 11 F. R-2F: Mixed Residential District 1 ...........................................................................109 12 G. R-2M: Mixed Residential District 2 ...........................................................................109 13 H. R-3: Multifamily Residential District 1.......................................................................110 14 I. R-4: Multifamily Residential District 2......................................................................110 15 J. R-4A: Multifamily Residential Mixed-Use District .....................................................111 16 K. R-5: Low Density Residential District .......................................................................114 17 L. R-6: Low-Density Residential (1 acre) District..........................................................114 18 M. R-7: Single-Family Residential (20K) District ...........................................................114 19 N. R-8: Low-Density Residential (4 acres) District.......................................................114 20 O. R-9: Low-Density Residential (2 acres) District........................................................114 21 P. R-10: Low-Density Residential, Alpine/Slope District...............................................115 22 21.04.030 Commercial Districts ....................................................................................................116 23 A. General Purpose/Intent of Commercial Districts ......................................................116 24 B. B-1A: Local and Neighborhood Business District ....................................................116 25 C. B-3: General Business District .................................................................................117 26 D. RO: Residential Office District..................................................................................118 27 E. MC: Marine Commercial District..............................................................................119 28 21.04.040 Downtown Districts.......................................................................................................119 29 A. DT-1: Downtown Core..............................................................................................119 30 B. DT-2: Downtown Mixed-Use....................................................................................119 31 C. DT-3: Downtown Mixed-Use Residential.................................................................119 32 21.04.050 Mixed-Use Districts.......................................................................................................119 33 A. General Purpose/Intent of Mixed-Use Districts ........................................................119 34 B. NMU: Neighborhood Mixed-Use District ..................................................................120 35 C. CMU: Community Mixed-Use District.......................................................................120 36 D. RMU: Regional Mixed-Use District...........................................................................121 37 E. MT-1: Midtown District Core....................................................................................122 38 F. MT-2: Midtown District General...............................................................................122 39 G. Mixed-Use District Development Standards.............................................................122 40 21.04.060 Industrial Districts.........................................................................................................124 41 A. General Purpose/Intent ............................................................................................124 42 B. I-1: Light Industrial District........................................................................................124 43 C. I-2: Heavy Industrial District......................................................................................124 44 D. MI: Marine Industrial District....................................................................................124 45 21.04.070 Other Districts ...............................................................................................................125 46 A. A: Airport District.......................................................................................................125 47 B. AF: Antenna Farm District ........................................................................................125 48 C. DR: Development Reserve District..........................................................................125 49 D. PCD: Planned Community Development District ....................................................125 50 E. PLI: Public Lands and Institutions District ................................................................126 51 F. PR: Parks and Recreation District...........................................................................126 52 G. TA: Turnagain Arm District .......................................................................................126 53 H. W: Watershed District...............................................................................................127 54 21.04.080 Overlay Zoning Districts ..............................................................................................127 55 A. General Purpose/Intent ............................................................................................127 Title 21: Land Use Planning Provisionally Adopted Anchorage, Alaska 1 B. Creation, Alteration, or Elimination of Overlay Districts ...........................................127 2 C. AHO: Airport Height Overlay District ........................................................................127 3 D. FHO: Flood Hazard Overlay District.........................................................................129 4 CHAPTER 21.05: USE REGULATIONS..................................................................................140 5 21.05.010 Tables of Allowed Uses................................................................................................140 6 A. Explanation of Table Abbreviations..........................................................................140 7 B. Table Organization ...................................................................................................141 8 C. Unlisted Uses ...........................................................................................................141 9 D. Use for Other Purposes Prohibited ..........................................................................141 10 E. Table of Allowed Uses – Residential Districts..........................................................142 11 F. Table of Allowed Uses – Commercial, Industrial, Mixed-Use, and Other Districts ..146 12 21.05.020 Generally Applicable Use Standards ..........................................................................157 13 A. Uses Involving the Retail Sale of Alcoholic Beverages............................................157 14 B. Premises Containing Uses Where Children are Not Allowed ..................................157 15 21.05.030 Residential Uses: Definitions and Use-Specific Standards .....................................158 16 A. Household Living ......................................................................................................158 17 B. Group Living .............................................................................................................165 18 21.05.040 Public/Institutional Uses: Definitions and Use-Specific Standards ........................168 19 A. Adult Care.................................................................................................................168 20 B. Child Care.................................................................................................................171 21 C. Community Service ..................................................................................................172 22 D. Cultural Facility .........................................................................................................176 23 E. Educational Facility...................................................................................................177 24 F. Health Care Facility ..................................................................................................180
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LDA BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS (2019) Lahore Development Authority 467-D/II, M.A Johar Town Lahore Tel: 042-99262321-99262369 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ LDA BUIDLING AND ZONNING REGULATIONS 2019 (with all amendments approved till 28-01-2020) LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOTIFICATION No. LDA/C&I/3798 DATED: 11.09.2019 The Governing Body of Lahore Development Authority in its meeting held on 24.08.2019 has approved Lahore Development Authority Building and Zoning Regulations 2019 and further approved minor corrections in the meeting 28.10.2019 & 28-01-2020. CHAPTER-I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Definitions Unless otherwise expressly stated, the following terms shall, for the purposes of these Regulations shall have the meanings indicated in this part. Where the terms are not defined they shall have their ordinarily accepted meaning or such meaning as the context may apply. Acre: means size of land equal to 43560 sq. ft (4047 sq.m) or 4840 sq. yards or 9.68 Kanals Act: means the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975 Addition/Alteration: means any structural change brought about after approval of Building Plan without affecting or violating any provisions of these Regulations. Addition & Alteration Plan: Building plans submitted to the Authority for obtaining approval of any structural change brought about after the completion of the building without affecting or violating any provision of these Regulations. Amalgamation: means the joining of two or more adjoining (side by side and/or back to back) plots of the same land use into a single plot for building purposes. Apartment: means a dwelling unit located in a multi-storey building meant to provide habitation.
    [Show full text]
  • JOB TITLE: Carpenter LOCATION: State College, PA COMPANY
    JOB TITLE: Carpenter LOCATION: State College, PA COMPANY: Envinity is an energy conservation, efficiency and generation company that is rooted in the building science approach to green design, construction and energy management. Envinity’s Design and Construction group is seeking an experienced Carpenter to contribute to the group’s growth and service offerings. JOB SUMMARY: Envinity’s Residential Design + Build group focuses on creating high performance, energy efficient homes. Other important aspects of our work include the design and construction of home additions, custom woodworking, and other home improvements utilizing local resources and high performance building methods. Envinity has designed and constructed a wide range of energy savings projects from ENERGY STAR and Zero Energy Ready Homes rated new home construction to mechanical systems, home performance upgrades and alternative energy systems. To support and grow these efforts, Envinity is seeking a Carpenter with at least two years experience performing carpentry tasks. Qualified candidates should be versed in construction techniques, knowledge on how to safely use a wide variety of tools, experience in home construction and renovation projects, and a desire to improve your skills while working under some of the best carpenters in Centre County. This position requires some knowledge of building science and system interactions, strong communication skills, strong organizational skills, and a desire to make people’s homes more energy efficient. This position is primarily field-based performing all phases of carpentry and homebuilding on construction projects. JOB TASKS Perform basic rough and finish carpentry tasks. Read and interpret construction drawings and details. Understanding of home performance details such as air sealing and insulation techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 31 Issue 4 Article 4 1982 Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law Kermit J. Lind Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Housing Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Kermit J. Lind, Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law, 31 Clev. St. L. Rev. 603 (1982) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol31/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAINTAINING RESIDENTIAL INTEGRATION: MUNICIPAL PRACTICES AND LAW KERMIT J. LIND* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 603 II. BACKGROUND .......................................... 606 III. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................... 611 A. Civil Rights Act of 1866 ............................ 612 B . Title VIII ......................................... 613 C. The Constitution ................................... 620 IV. POLICIES AND PROGRAMS ............................... 629 A. Knowledge of Conditions and Changes ................ 630 B. Local Legislation and Policy Statements .............. 633 C. Controlling Unfavorable Real Estate Practices ........ 635 D. Affirmative Action
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Common Ownership Community Manual
    COMMON OWNERSHIP COMMUNITY MANUAL & RESOURCE GUIDE Prepared by: Montgomery County Commission on Common Ow nership Communities Department of Housing & Community Affairs 1401 Rockville Pike, 4th Floor Rockville, Maryland 20852 2019 Copyright 2019, Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities. This Manual provides general information only and is not intended to give accounting, legal, or investment advice. Please contact a licensed professional advisor before relying on any information contained herein. 1 MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AND PANEL CHAIRS Jaunary 2019 COMMISSIONERS Mark Fine, Chairman Mike Burrows, Vice Chair & Chair - Information & Tech. Committee Ilana Branda, Chair – Legislative Committee Marietta Ethier, Esq., Chair – Process/Procedure Committee Kathy Viney, Chair – Education Committee Rand Fishbein, Ph.D., Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair David Gardner, Esq., Commissioner Staci Gelfound, AMS, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair Leonard Malamud, Esq., Commissioner Peter Myo Khin, Commissioner Andrew Oxendine, Commissioner Donald J. Perper, CMCA, PCAM, Commissioner Galia Steinbach, Commissioner Dallas Valley, Commissioner Aimee Winegar, CMCA, LSM, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Vice Chair COMMISSION PANEL CHAIRS Hon. Bruce Birchman, Esq. Rachel Browder, Esq. Brian Fellner, Esq. Charles Fleischer, Esq. Sarah Stanton, Esq. Dinah Stevens, Esq. Partap Verma, Esq. Mediators Michael Lang Sarah Stanton Partap Verma Timothy Goetzinger, Acting Director, Montgomery County, Department of Housing and Community Affairs 2 3
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Community Association Manual and Are Pertinent to Community Association Interests
    FAIRFAX COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANUAL Written and Published by: Fairfax County Department of Cable Communications and Consumer Protection Consumer Protection Division Tel. 703-222-8435 FAX 703-222-5921 TDD 703-222-8653 Rev. 04 Fairfax County, Virginia BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GERALD E. CONNOLLY CHAIRMAN SHARON BULOVA VICE CHAIRMAN BRADDOCK DISTRICT JOAN M. DUBOIS GERALD W. HYLAND DRANESVILLE DISTRICT MOUNT VERNON DISTRICT MICHAEL R. FREY DANA KAUFFMAN SULLY DISTRICT LEE DISTRICT PENELOPE A. GROSS ELAINE McCONNELL MASON DISTRICT SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT CATHERINE M. HUDGINS LINDA Q. SMYTH HUNTER MILL DISTRICT PROVIDENCE DISTRICT ANTHONY H. GRIFFIN COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID J. MOLCHANY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GAIL CONDRICK, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Policy Fairfax County is committed to nondiscrimination and supports the provisions of ADA in providing equal access with respect to all of its programs, services and employment to individuals with disabilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ vi Preface.......................................................................................................................................... viii Introduction...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plpr Volos Private Residential
    PLPR VOLOS PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES: A CROSS CULTURAL COMPARISON DWIGHT H. MERRIAM, FAICP ROBINSON & COLE LLP HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT USA In the last half-century throughout the world there has been a near geometric increase in the number of private residential communities, many of them gated and secured from their larger communities. England, New Zealand, France, Portugal, Spain, Mexico, China, South Africa, Russia, Argentina and numerous other Latin American countries, Lebanon, and the United States of America have all experienced this growth in varying ways and with some similar impacts and some different ones. This article reviews the experiences across several nations for a cross-cultural comparison to identify points of commonality and differences and how we might learn from each other in terms of managing private residential communities now and in the future. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In 1964 there were fewer than 500 so-called “common interest developments.” The terminology here reaches a number of different types of development and organizational scenarios. Common interest developments include single-family residential developments where there are covenants and cross-easements and other legal restrictions imposed on individual property owners. The term might also include condominiums which are not so much a form of development as they are a form of ownership in which individual residential units are owned individually. In condominiums, in addition to the privately-owned units there are “limited common elements” which might include a porch or patio and a small backyard, and “common elements” shared equally and openly by all owners, including access drives, parking, parks, recreational amenities. We also have cooperative ownership arrangements under which an entire building or group of buildings is owned by a single corporation and individual tenants live under perpetual tenancy- in-common arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation Under the Link Policy: a Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China
    Article Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation under the Link Policy: A Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China Cunming Zou, Jianzhi Liu, Bencheng Liu, Xuhan Zheng and Yangang Fang * School of Geographical Sciences of Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-431-85099550 Received: 7 September 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: Land, nature, and the social environment in contiguous poor regions are harsh and difficult to change. The poor adaptive capacities of the socio-ecological systems of these regions are the main causes of deep, persistent poverty. In February 2016, the Chinese government issued a policy proposing to promote poverty alleviation by relocation (PAR) by means of the “Linking increases in urban construction land with decreases in rural construction land” policy (or simply, the “Link Policy” or LP), which intends to realize the sustainable social and economic development of local villages. Since then, many pilot projects have been carried out across the country based on local resources, environment, and economic development; however, few related studies on these cases have been conducted. After a review of poverty alleviation policies, this paper first introduces the unsustainable conditions of poor rural areas and the implications and advantages of PAR under the Link Policy; we then analyzed the complete PAR process, including formulation, implementation, and completion, by taking Tongyu County in Jilin Province as an example. The study found that the “whole village relocation” model practiced in Tongyu County was relatively successful in terms of improving the living environment, income, and public services of local villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Planning
    4.6 Land Use and Planning This section describes existing land uses in and around the Planning Area, pertinent City and regional land use policies and regulations, and the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan related to the physical division of an established community, fundamental conflicts between land uses, and fundamental conflicts with applicable land use plans and policies adopted for purposes of avoiding or mitigating environmental impacts. Physical Setting Surrounding Land Uses Existing land uses surrounding the Planning Area are described below. Beginning north of the Planning Area and preceding clockwise, the surrounding land uses include the following: • To the north is the Emeryville portion of the East BayBridge Shopping Center (the shopping center is located partly in Oakland and partly in Emeryville), which contains regional commercial, community commercial and medium-density residential uses. Other residential, light industrial, office and public uses are located further to the north in Emeryville. • Interstate 580 is located along the northern boundary of the Planning Area. North of I-580 is the Longfellow residential neighborhood around MacArthur Boulevard and 40th Street in North Oakland. • To the northeast is the MacArthur BART Station, within the median of the State Route 24 freeway. Phase 1 of the MacArthur Transit Village, which will provide 624 new high-density, multifamily housing units, retail space, and a new 478-space BART parking garage, is currently under construction adjacent to the MacArthur BART Station. • Interstate 980 is located along the eastern boundary of the Planning Area. East of I-980 are the Pill Hill and Uptown neighborhoods, Downtown Oakland, City Center, Old Oakland and the 19th Street and 12th Street BART Stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide: Windows & Doors
    STUDY GUIDE: WINDOWS & DOORS Learning Objectives: • The features and benefi ts of the products you sell. • How to answer your customers’ product-related questions. • How to help your customer choose the right products. • How to increase transaction sizes by learning more about add-on sales and upselling techniques. Chapter 1: Windows Module 1: Window Construction Product Knowledge: • The Jamb is the frame around the top and side of a window. • The Sill is the piece that forms the bottom member of a window frame. It sheds water away from the window and wall and usually extends 1” to 1-1/2” from the wall. • The Frame is the entire jamb and sill assembly. • The Sash (or Vent) is the frame that immediately surrounds the glass, or the entire frame and glass assembly. • The Stops are fastened around the inside of the jamb to hold the sliding sash in place or provide a meeting surface for a swinging sash. • The Mullion is the connecting piece between two or more windows fastened together. • The Stool is the fl at trim piece at the bottom inside of the window. • The Apron is fastened along the interior wall beneath the stool, to hide the gap between the bottom of the window and the wall. • The Casing is the trim around the inside or outside of the window that hides the gap between the window and the surrounding wall. Window frame materials Next, let’s look at the basic types of materials used in the window frame. Wood • Wood sash are made with mortise-and-tenon joints and glued together.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Residential Utilities: a New Approach to Housing Quality
    Organizing Residential Utilities: A New Approach to Housing Quality Organizing Residential Utilities: A New Approach to Housing Quality Prepared for: Prepared by: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Richard Topping Development Tyson Lawrence Office of Policy Development and Research Justin Spencer Washington, DC TIAX LLC Cambridge, Massachusetts and Kent Larson November 2004 TJ McLeish The House_n Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Acknowledgements The authors would like to recognize the advisory team, which helped contribute to the industry background and provided review of concepts. The advisory team included Tedd Benson, Bensonwood Homes; Ray Cudwadie, Deluxe Homes; Al Marzullo, TKG East Engineering; John Tocci, Tocci Building; Nelson Oliveira, Nelson Group Construction; Ling Yi Liu, Oak Tree Development; Jim Petersen, Pulte Home Sciences; Randy Luther, Centex Homes; Hiroshi Abe, Seki Sui Homes; Ari Griffner, Griffner-Haus; and John Benson, Meadwestvaco. Thanks also to Christine Murner, GE Plastics, for providing a tour of the Living Environments House. The authors would also like to thank David Dacquisto, Newport Partners; Mark Nowak, Newport Partners; Michael Crosbie, Ph.D., RA, Steven Winter Associates; and Ron Wakefield, Ph.D., Virginia Tech, for providing review and discussion via teleconference during the literature review. The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and guidance provided by Mike Blanford and Luis Borray from HUD. Disclaimer The statements and conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of the U.S. Government. The authors have made every effort to verify the accuracy and appropriateness of the report’s content.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhance the Isle
    ENHANCE THE ISLE 88 Promote sustainable economic growth that increases opportunities for all residents and increases overall quality of life. 89 ENHANCE THE ISLE During the public forums, citizens expressed their desire to obtain additional goods and services, jobs, and more housing options locally rather than CITIZEN COMMENTS PUBLIC FORUM 1 having to drive outside the County to fulfill these WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST ISSUES FACING needs. The community can seek to address these ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY? issues by diversifying the local economy, investing in • “Protecting our farmland technological advances to facilitate commerce, and from disappearing” implementing policies to ensure a diversity of housing • “Balanced full range of housing from highest mini estates to low income housing” types. These measures can improve overall quality • “Bedroom community — of life by raising local wealth levels through job need more major employers” creation, access to online resources, and offering WHAT IS THE BEST THING ABOUT ISLE OF WIGHT? housing choices. • “Support of economic development and The County’s economic development strategy has business assistance” direct consequences for land use, transportation, PUBLIC FORUM 2 SCENARIO COMPARISONS housing, and provision of community facilities and • “The focus on a diverse education pathway for services. The ability to pay for costs of growth and the workforce” to manage growth effectively is related to the • “Agriculture is important, but we need to look at how balance achieved between commercial and the County can assist our farmers to diversify and promote alternatives such as more fresh industrial employment opportunities and vegetable farms” residential development. PUBLIC FORUM 3 In order to support a wide range of community PREFERRED SCENARIOS • “We need high speed internet in rural areas facilities and services and reduce the tax burden on of the County” existing residential development, the County must attract and sustain non-residential development.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Crafts Technology (TOP 0952.00) Regional Program Demand Report
    Construction Crafts Technology (TOP 0952.00) Regional Program Demand Report Foothill College, San Francisco larger MSA Economic Modeling Specialists Inc. Regional Program Growth Report | Foothill College Introduction and Contents Contents Focus College Executive Summary 3 Foothill College Job Outlook Summary 5 Inverse Staffing Patterns 9 Region Definition Regional Graduation Summary 10 Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Occupational Programs & Completers 12 Mateo, Santa Clara Purpose and Goals This report is designed to integrate and analyze data from multiple sources to help educational institutions Key Terms and Concepts discover regional labor market needs for certain Programs: Courses of postsecondary study defined by postsecondary programs of study. The overall goal is CIP (Classification of Instructional Programs) codes. to help a college align their program offerings the Occupation: A category of workers defined by the economy and labor market of its service region. To do Standard Occupational Classification (SOC). this, the report selects a set of focus occupations, determines the regional job outlook for them, and Relating occupations to Programs: EMSI determines compares this to the number of recent graduates in these links using information from the U.S. related programs at regional educational institutions. Department of Education. While this is a first step toward a supply/demand Replacement Jobs: The estimated number of job analysis, for increased accuracy it could be extended openings in an occupation due to retirement, with survey-based information from local employers turnover, and other factors aside from job growth. regarding their hiring outlook and recruitment sources. Based on national percentages by occupation. The occupation employment and wage numbers are Annual openings: The sum of new jobs and estimated from EMSI's national Complete Employment database, replacement jobs for a given occupation, divided by which is built using numerous published data sources the number of years in the timeframe.
    [Show full text]