Report on Road User Needs and Requirements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on Road User Needs and Requirements REPORT ON ROAD USER NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS 1 Report on Road User Needs and Requirements Outcome of the European GNSS’ User Consultation Platform Reference: GSA-MKD-RD-UREQ-250283 Issue/Revision: 2.0 Date: 01/07/2019 Change record Issue/ Revision Changes Date 1.0 First issue 18/10/2018 2.0 Refer to Annex 6 01/07/2019 REPORT ON ROAD USER NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS 3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT OF THE REPORT 5 1.1 Methodology 6 1.2 Scope 8 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 12 4 GNSS MARKET OVERVIEW AND TRENDS FOR ROAD 14 4.1 Market Evolution and Key Trends 14 4.2 Main Market Players 16 4.3 Main User Groups 17 5 GNSS USER REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS 18 5.1 GNSS Use in Road 18 5.2 Prospective Use of GNSS in Road 26 5.3 GNSS Limitations for Road 29 5.4 Drivers for User Requirements in Road 33 5.5 Conclusions 35 6 USER REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION 36 6.1 Synthesis of UR Analysis 36 7 ANNEXES 39 Annex 1: Major Projects V2X Underway in the World 39 Annex 2: Synthesis of Road User Requirements 39 Annex 3: Key Standardization Bodies and Organizations 39 Annex 4: Definition of Key GNSS Performance Parameters 41 Annex 5: List of Acronyms 43 Annex 6: Updates following the User Consultation Platform 2018 48 4 01 TableS AND FIGURES Tables Table 1: Performance parameters 10 Table 2: Safety Critical Applications 22 Table 3: Payment Critical Applications 23 Table 4: Regulatory Critical Applications 23 Table 5: Smart mobility for traffic managers and transport companies 24 Table 6: Smart mobility for safety and comfort of drivers 25 Table 7: Example of identification of reference scenarios for testing purposes 32 Table 8: Requirements for Traffic and Safety Warning applications 36 Table 9: Requirements for automated interventions and autonomous driving 37 Table 10: Requirements for payment critical applications 37 Table 11: Requirements for smart mobility applications 38 Table 12: Requirements for smart mobility applications 39 Figures Figure 1: Iter Avto – The world’s first automobile navigation system (1930) 5 Figure 2: Road User Requirements Methodology 7 Figure 3: Historical GNSS Road market data – shipments 14 Figure 4: Forecast GNSS Road market data – shipments 15 Figure 5: GNSS Road Value Chain 16 Figure 6: Car2Car V2X applications roadmap 27 Figure 7: Komatsu began trials of its Autonomous Haulage Systems (AHS) in a partnership with mining company Rio Tinto in 2008 28 Figure 8: An autonomous vehicle during the 2015 ITS World Congress in Bordeaux guided by RTK GNSS. After 5 days of operation we can note the accuracy of the guiding thanks to the traces left by tires 29 Figure 9: Block diagram from [RD6], showing the relationship between performance at PVT and application levels 30 Figure 10: The logical breakdown and PVT interface between GNSS-based positioning terminal and road-domain application, as adopted in [RD14] 30 Figure 11: Block diagram of the GBLS (level 2) [RD13], showing details of the Positioning Module (a). Block diagram of the GBLS (level 3) [RD13], showing possible sensors of the Positioning Module (b) 31 REPORT ON ROAD USER NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS 5 introduction and context 01 of the report ven if the first prototypes of automobile navigation The next step will be the intensive use of GNSS in vehi- systems were available in the first half of the Twentieth cle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications Ecentury (see “Iter Avto”, the world’s first automobile that will pave the way to Automated vehicles. Advanced navigator, created in 1930 on Figure 1 here after), millions of Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) currently used to improve drivers discovered the benefits of in car navigation systems the safety or mobility of the driver, are being further devel- in the 90s when GNSS road navigation systems appeared on oped as precursor to automated vehicles. Industry players dashboards. Road traffic information and guidance services such as Tesla, Baidu, Honda, Toyota, Uber and more are took off at the same time. already rushing to bring the first commercial vehicle to market. Since R&D technical details may reveal the under- Figure 1: Iter Avto – The world’s first automobile lining strategy, industry players are not willing to share navigation system (1930) information about their requirements. Nonetheless, the identification of a set of commonly accepted technical user requirements could provide a number of benefits Nowadays to the entire industry. In this sense, this document includes a first set of GNSS service technical User Requirements related to the in-vehicle positioning system is an option with special regards to the perfor- selected by mance of the GNSS receiver. Some of the requirements of the in- vehi- a significant cles Positioning, Velocity and Tim- ing (PVT) system directly apply to number of GNSS receivers, while others are the result of a data fusion process, which car buyers depends on all connected sensors, communication technologies, and PVT processing algorithms. It should be intended as a first step towards the definition of commonly accepted technical user requirements, which should be validated periodically by GNSS technical experts from both the scientific community Nowadays GNSS service is an option selected by a significant and the industry. It should also be updated on a regular basis number of car buyers. Nevertheless, due to the cost of this to guarantee adherence to the technology evolution, the option, which is very often associated with other devices evolving normative frameworks and/or the certification/ (like radio or mobile phones) many customers prefer to use type approval procedures. a personal navigation device or their familiar smartphones. Consequently, GNSS is present in almost all cars and service The User Consultation Platform (UCP) is a periodic forum providers have developed a long list of services dedicated organised by the European Commission and the GSA involv- to comfort, entertainment and safety. ing end users, user associations and representatives of the value chain, such as receiver and chipset manufacturers, Public authorities also embarked on the new possibilities application developers and the organisations and insti- brought by GNSS. Regulations in Europe for interoperabil- tutions dealing, directly and indirectly, with Galileo and ity of Road User Charges, the deployment of eCall on all EGNOS. The event is a part of the process developed at the new types of vehicles from 2018 and the control of digital GSA to collect user needs and requirements and take them tachograph on trucks and passenger vehicles with more 9 as inputs for provision of user driven Galileo and EGNOS seats are the most outstanding examples. services. In this context, the objective of this document is 6 1/ INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT OF THE REPORT to provide a reference for the European GNSS Programmes 1.1 Methodology and for the automotive community reporting periodically the most up-to-date GNSS user needs and requirements The following figure details the methodology adopted for in the Road market segment. This report is considered a the analysis of the Road user requirements. “living document” in the sense that it will serve as a key input to the next UCP event where it will be reviewed and The analysis is split into two main steps including a “desk subsequently updated. The UCP will be held periodically research”, to gather main insights, and a “stakeholders con- (e.g. once per year) and this report will be also periodically sultation”, to validate main outcomes. updated, to reflect the evolution in the user needs, market and technology captured during the UCP. More in details, “desk research” was based on a secondary research and aimed at providing a preliminary structured The report aims to provide the GSA with a clear and up-to- analysis: date view of the current and potential future user needs and y leveraging on the Road applications’ segmentation as requirements in order to serve as an input to the continuous included in the GSA GNSS market report, additional rele- improvement of the services provided by the European vant applications have been identified and included; and GNSS systems and their evolutions. y for each application identified, the function and level of Finally, as the report is publicly available, it serves also as a performance required has been determined. reference for users and industry, supporting planning and decision-making activities for those concerned with the use As a result of this activity, a first draft of the Road User of location technologies. Requirements document has been produced. It must be noted that the listed user needs and requirements In the second step, the “stakeholder consultation” one, cannot usually be addressed by a single technological solu- main outcomes included in the document have been val- tion but rather by combination of several signals and sensors. idated and updated. In this regard, preliminary validation Therefore the report does not represent any commitment interviews with selected stakeholders have produced the of the European GNSS Programmes to address or satisfy the current document to be used as a input for the UPC review listed user needs and requirements in the current or future and finalisation. versions of the EGNSS services. REPORT ON ROAD USER NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS 7 Figure 2: Road User Requirements Methodology OVERALL METHODOLOGY 1 Identification of all existing Road applications User level dimension and characterisation along with the function that they perform y Identification of the key GNSS
Recommended publications
  • The Approved Tachograph Centre Manual
    The Approved Tachograph Centre manual Safety, Standards, Service Contents Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Section 2 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Section 3 Becoming a tachograph centre ........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 How to become a tachograph centre .......................................................................................... 11 3.2 The approval process ................................................................................................................ 13 3.3 Fees ........................................................................................................................................ 14 3.4 Standards of service from a centre to a vehicle presenter ............................................................. 14 3.5 Publication of authorised tachograph centre information ............................................................... 15 3.6 Facilities at a standard approved tachograph centre ...................................................................... 15 3.7 Acceptable variations to existing approved tachograph centres ..................................................... 25 3.8 Requirements for remote area approved tachograph centres .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minibus Handbook 3
    QBE European Operations Minibus Operator Handbook A guide to managing risk Contents UK regulatory information 3 Minibuses and drivers’ hours 6 Tachographs 11 Driving effectively 12 Young people and special requirements 15 Operational procedures 17 In the event of an incident 22 At the end of the journey 26 Safe operating checklist 27 Useful information 28 The buffer between the best-laid plans and uncertain reality 29 QBE for minibus insurance 30 QBE Minibus Handbook 3 UK regulatory information Driving licences for minibuses you can only do so if you have passed a further test to obtain Category D1. A minibus is normally a vehicle that can carry between 8 and 16 passengers plus the driver. If you wish to take a minibus (8 seats or If you can carry more than 16 passengers then larger) outside the UK in the EU/EEA area, you should seek proper guidance as you may irrespective of the purpose of the trip, you will require a different category of driving licence. need to have the full Category D1 entitlement (obtained through examination) unless all four Driving Licences for minibuses changed in of the criteria below are met: January 2013. If you are unfamiliar with these changes please visit: www.gov.uk/changes-to- • It is not for Hire and Reward the-driving-licence-and-categories • You passed your driving test before 1st January 1997 and have the Category D1 These changes do not affect you if you held entitlement (not for Hire and Reward) on your licence before 19 January 2013. The your licence new licence quotes the minibus category as • You are not being paid D1 and you will need to have an authority to • The visit is a temporary one.
    [Show full text]
  • Overtake Assistance
    Overtake assistance Examensarbete utfört i fordonssystem av Tomas Backlund LiTH-ISY-EX--10/4328--SE Linköping 2010 ii Overtake assistance Examensarbete utfört i fordonssystem av Tomas Backlund LiTH -ISY-EX--10/4328--SE Handledare: Erik Hellström Linköpings Universitet Henrik Pettersson Scania CV AB Examinator: Jan Åslund Linköpings Universitet Linköping, 9 Mars, 2010 iii iv Biblioteksblad v vi Abstract This thesis is about the development of a function that assists the driver of a heavy vehicle to do an estimation over the possibilities to overtake a preceding heavy vehicle. The function utilizes Look-Ahead and vehicle-to- vehicle communication to do a calculation of the distance between the vehicles in some road distance ahead. Consequently the report also contains an investigation of what data that is needed to be known about a vehicle to be able to do a satisfying estimation about this vehicle. The most vital problem is to estimate what velocity the vehicle will get in an uphill/downhill slope. A Simulink model is developed to simulate the function with two independent vehicles. Real tests are also performed to evaluate the velocity estimation part of the function. vii viii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my supervisors Henrik Pettersson at Scania and Erik Hellström at Linköpings Universitet for all their support and input to the thesis. I would also like to thank all colleagues at REP for taking time to answering my questions and giving inputs. A special thank to Rickard Lyberger for his help with the GPS and road slope units to the test vehicles. Tomas Backlund Södertälje, 2010 ix x Content Chapter 1 Introduction ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DMV Driver Manual
    New Hampshire Driver Manual i 6WDWHRI1HZ+DPSVKLUH DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES MESSAGE FROM THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES Driving a motor vehicle on New Hampshire roadways is a privilege and as motorists, we all share the responsibility for safe roadways. Safe drivers and safe vehicles make for safe roadways and we are pleased to provide you with this driver manual to assist you in learning New Hampshire’s motor vehicle laws, rules of the road, and safe driving guidelines, so that you can begin your journey of becoming a safe driver. The information in this manual will not only help you navigate through the process of obtaining a New Hampshire driver license, but it will highlight safe driving tips and techniques that can help prevent accidents and may even save a life. One of your many responsibilities as a driver will include being familiar with the New Hampshire motor vehicle laws. This manual includes a review of the laws, rules and regulations that directly or indirectly affect you as the operator of a motor vehicle. Driving is a task that requires your full attention. As a New Hampshire driver, you should be prepared for changes in the weather and road conditions, which can be a challenge even for an experienced driver. This manual reviews driving emergencies and actions that the driver may take in order to avoid a major collision. No one knows when an emergency situation will arise and your ability to react to a situation depends on your alertness. Many factors, such as impaired vision, fatigue, alcohol or drugs will impact your ability to drive safely.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Improve the Safety of Goods Vehicles in the EU? (PIN Flash
    HOW TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF GOODS VEHICLES IN THE EU? PIN Flash Report 39 May 2020 PIN Panel PIN Steering Group Austria (AT) Klaus Machata, Road Safety Board (KFV) Henk Stipdonk, Netherlands Institute for Transport Belgium (BE) Stijn Daniels, VIAS institute Analysis (KiM) (PIN Co-chair) Bulgaria (BG) Aleksi Kesyakov, State-Public Consultative Heather Ward, University College London (UCL), Commission on Road Safety (PIN Co-chair) Croatia (HR) Sanja Veić, Ministry of Interior Richard Allsop, ETSC Board of Directors (PIN Czechia (CZ) Jiří Ambros, Jindřich Frič, Transport Research Advisor) Centre (CDV) Letty Aarts, Institute for Road Safety Research Cyprus (CY) George Morfakis, Road Safety Expert (SWOV) Denmark (DK) Pernille Ehlers, Danish Road Safety Council Lars Ekman, Swedish Transport Administration Estonia (EE) Maria Pashkevich, Road Administration Finland (FI) Esa Räty, Finnish Crash Data Institute (OTI) Eduard Fernández, CITA France (FR) Malo Quancard, Manuelle Salathé, National Jacqueline Lacroix, the German Road Safety Interministerial Road Safety Observatory Council (DVR) Germany (DE) Jacqueline Lacroix, German Road Safety Astrid Linder, Swedish National Road and Council (DVR) Transport Research Institute (VTI) Greece (EL) George Yannis, Technical University of Athens Wiebke Matysik, Toyota Motor Europe Hungary (HU) Péter Holló, Institute for Transport Sciences (KTI) Ireland (IE) Sharon Heffernan, Velma Burns, Road Safety Guro Ranes, Norwegian Public Roads Authority (RSA) Administration Israel (IL) Shalom Hakkert, Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers License Manual
    6973_Cover 9/5/07 8:15 AM Page 2 LITTERING: ARKANSAS ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR INFORMATION Following the successful completion of driver testing, Arkansas license applicants will IT’S AGAINST THE LAW. be asked whether they wish to register as an organ or tissue donor. The words “Organ With a driver license comes the responsibility of being familiar with Donor” will be printed on the front of the Arkansas driver license for those individuals the laws of the road. As a driver you are accountable for what may be who choose to participate as a registered organ donor. thrown from the vehicle onto a city street or state highway. Arkansas driver license holders, identified as organ donors, will be listed in a state 8-6-404 PENALTIES registry. The donor driver license and registry assist emergency services and medical (a)(1)(A)(i) A person convicted of a violation of § 8-6-406 or § 8-6-407 for a first offense personnel identify the individuals who have chosen to offer upon death, their body’s shall be guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and shall be fined in an amount of not organs to help another person have a second chance at life (i.e. the transplant of heart, less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). kidneys, liver, lungs, pancreas, corneas, bone, skin, heart valves or tissue). (ii) An additional sentence of not more than eight (8) hours of community service shall be imposed under this subdivision (a)(1)(A). It will be important, should you choose to participate in the donor program to speak (B)(i) A person convicted of a violation of § 8-6-406 or § 8-6- court shall have his or her driver's license suspended for six with your family about the decision so that your wishes can be carried-out upon your 407 for a second or subsequent offense within three (3) years (6) months by the Department of Finance and Administration, death.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Scenario Designs for Driving Simulator Experiments
    Risk scenario designs for driving simulator experiments 1st Roja Ezzati Amini 2nd Eva Michelaraki 3rd Christos Katrakazas Chair of Transportation Systems Department of Transportation Planning Department of Transportation Planning Engineering and Engineering and Engineering Techcnial University of Munich National Technical University of National Technical University of Munich, Germany Athens Athens email: [email protected] Athens, Greece Athens, Greece email: [email protected] email: [email protected] 4th Christelle Al Haddad Chair of Transportation Systems 5th Bart De Vos 6th Ariane Cuenen Engineering DriveSimSolutions School for Transportation Sciences Techcnial University of Munich Diepenbeek, Belgium Transportation Research Institute Munich, Germany email: UHasselt email: [email protected] [email protected] Diepenbeek, Belgium email: [email protected] 7th George Yannis 8th Tom Brijs 9th Constantinos Antoniou Department of Transportation Planning School for Transportation Sciences Chair of Transportation Systems and Engineering Transportation Research Institute Engineering National Technical University of UHasselt Techcnial University of Munich Athens Diepenbeek, Belgium Munich, Germany Athens, Greece email: [email protected] email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Abstract— Driving simulators have become widely used tools but also driving performance characteristics, such as for examining the impact of driver behaviour with respect to speeding, harsh braking, harsh acceleration,
    [Show full text]
  • Following Too Closely Behind Another Motorist, Or Tailgating, Is an Aggressive Driving Behavior
    What is tailgating? Following too closely behind another motorist, or tailgating, is an aggressive driving behavior. What is the Stop Tailgating project? The Stop Tailgating pilot project is a series of DOTS (circular pavement markings) and informational signs along a section of Highway 55 between Buffalo and Rockford to help motorists identify and maintain safe following distances. What does this project hope to accomplish? It is the intent of the project to educate motorists on how to identify and maintain safe minimum following distances, with the hope that they will apply the same learned behavior on other roadways making Minnesota roads safer. Where is the project located and why was it chosen? The project runs on a 2-mile section of State Highway 55 between Rockford and Buffalo. The site was chosen based on criteria of uninterrupted traffic flow, high crash rate, and community support of other safe driving projects. Nearly 80% of the crashes at intersections along Highway 55 in Wright County are rear-end collisions. Why is tailgating a problem? Following too closely, or tailgating, is a common poor driving behavior that is very dangerous and irritating to other drivers. In 2005, rear-end collisions accounted for 28.27% of the vehicle crashes and over 4.35% of the fatal traffic crashes in Minnesota. 23 people died in rear-end crashes in Minnesota during 2005. What is the recommended safe following distance while driving? The Minnesota Driver’s Manual recommends a minimum 3-second following distance between your vehicle and the vehicle ahead of you. This rule applies to passenger cars and light trucks traveling in ideal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tachomaster Drivers' Guide to the Digital Tachograph
    Tachomaster Drivers’ Guide to the Digital Tachograph The Tachomaster Drivers’ Guide to the Digital Tachograph i June 2009 © 2009 Road Tech Computer Systems Ltd. All rights reserved. All the regulatory information given in this guide is available through the European Commission and the UK Department for Transport. All of the information specifically relating to Siemens, Stoneridge and Actia Digital Tachograph Vehicle Units has been sourced from specification sheets and user manuals. While every effort has been made to provide accurate content within this guide, Tachomaster does not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained herein. Reference herein to any company or product does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by Tachomaster. Tachomaster and the Tachomaster Logo are Trademarks of Road Tech Computer Systems Ltd. All other trademarks and copyrights are herein acknowledged. This document may be freely distributed, electronically or in print, provided that it remains in its entirety and is not edited, amended or changed in any way whatsoever. www.tachomaster.co.uk The Tachomaster Drivers’ Guide to the Digital Tachograph ii June 2009 This Tachomaster Driver Guide has been compiled by Steve Williams. Steve Williams has been involved in the road haulage sector for over 30 years, beginning as an employed lorry driver then moving on to become an owner-driver, before setting up his own haulage company in 1982. From 1997 until 2007, Steve worked for the Road Haulage Association, setting up the Association’s first regional help desk, before moving on to become Project Manager within the newly formed ‘National Operations Centre’.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of the Road
    Rules of the Road The 2017 State of Wyoming DRIVER LICENSE MANUAL - 1 - Table of contents RULES OF THE ROAD ..........................................36 Speed ................................................................ 36 CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE ................................ 3 Legal speed limits (All unless otherwise posted) .......................................................36 Driver licensing .................................................. 3 Adjust speed for road conditions...........................................................................36 REQUIREMENTS TO DRIVE ..........................................................................................3 Adjust speed for traffic conditions .........................................................................36 THOSE WHO DO NOT NEED A WYOMING DRIVER LICENSE.....................................3 Adjust speed for light conditions...........................................................................37 WHO CANNOT GET A WYOMING DRIVER LICENSE...................................................3 Right of way ...........................................................................................................37 YOUR WYOMING LICENSE..........................................................................................4 Roundabouts..........................................................................................................40 Driver license classes ................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • "Best Practice" Model for Tailgating Events
    OF Editorial Board and Staff: Editor: Venue Mark S. Nagel Event University of South Carolina JOURNAL Management Associate Editor: & UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA John M. Grady University of South Carolina Consulting Editor: Peter J. Graham University of South Carolina Essential Components of a “Best Editorial Review Board Members: Rob Ammon—Slippery Rock University Practice” Model for Tailgating Events John Benett—Venue Management Association, Asia Pacific Limited Andy Gillentine—University of South Carolina Chris Bigelow—The Bigelow John Miller— Texas Tech University Companies, Inc. Brian Crow—Slippery Rock University Matt Brown—University of South Carolina Brad Gessner—San Diego Convention Center Peter Gruber —Wiener Stadthalle, Austria Todd Hall—Georgia Southern University Kim Mahoney—Industry Consultant Michael Mahoney—California State University at Fresno Larry Perkins—RBC Center Carolina Hurricanes Jim Riordan—Florida Atlantic University Frank Roach—University of South Carolina Philip Rothschild—Missouri State University Frank Russo—Global Spectrum Rodney J. Smith—University of Denver Kenneth C. Teed—The George Washington University Scott Wysong—University of Dallas Abstract Tailgating has become an accepted and valued component of sport and entertainment events. However, recent occurrences and continued analysis of tailgating risk management practices have revealed a consistent group of concerns regarding the organization and hosting of tailgating events. As event environments have become more financially and legally complex, the need for a systematic methodology for conducting events has become more apparent (O’Toole, 2000). The current patchwork system of tailgating risk management methodologies leaves many event managers in a vulnerable position in terms of potential litigation (Gillentine & Miller, 2006). A method that may be employed to guard against such vulnerabilities is the use of a best practices model (O’Toole, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • STC-8250A Digital Tachograph Operation Manual
    STC-8250A Digital Tachograph Operation Manual AVU-AGD-OPE Rev 0.7 19.10.2017 Declaration of Confirmation This declaration, officially register the confirmation of the product named as Definition : Aselsan Digital Tachograph Model : Aselsan STC-8250A TOE Version : v1.1 According to the Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3821/85 (Annex-1B) on recording equipment in road transport (EU) dated 20 December 1985 and its latest ammendments. Product is evaluated according to the following European Union regulations: 1. Regulation (EC) No. 2135/98 2. Regulation (EC) No. 1360/2002 3. Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 4. Regulation (EC) No. 1266/2009 5. AETR Agreement. ASELSAN A.Ş. Communication and Information Technologies Divison Mehmet Akif Ersoy Mah. 296. Cad. No: 16 Yenimahalle 06370 ANKARA Phone: +90 312 592 10 00 Fax: +90 312 354 13 02 ASELSAN STC-8250 A DIGITAL TACHOGRAPH 2 OPERATION MANUAL AVU-AGD-OPE Rev-0.7 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 3 Safety .............................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 10 General ......................................................................................................................... 10 Notational Conventions ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]