1 Samuel 6:10 – 7:2 July 15, 2018 Faith Presbyterian Church – Morning Service Pr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Samuel 6:10 – 7:2 July 15, 2018 Faith Presbyterian Church – Morning Service Pr “Dwelling with Imminent Transcendence” 1 Samuel 6:10 – 7:2 July 15, 2018 Faith Presbyterian Church – Morning Service Pr. Nicoletti We’ll be looking at 1 Samuel 6:10-7:2 this morning. It could be helpful to recap again where we are at in the story in 1 Samuel. In 1 Samuel 4 the Israelites went to war with the Philistines. Because they were not being faithful to their God, the Christian God of the Bible, identified in the Hebrew by the name Yahweh, the maker of heaven and earth – because they had not been faithful to him, he did not help them in battle, but allowed them to be defeated. Then, rather than reflecting on their sin, on their failure to live in the ways God had called them to, the Israelites instead took the Ark of the Covenant, the special box kept in the holiest part of the sanctuary, which was understood to be God’s throne, which represented his special presence, and they brought it into battle with them, as an attempt to force God’s hand to fight for them. They tried to manipulate God rather than renew their faithfulness to him from the heart. God then responded by allowing an even greater defeat and allowing the Philistines to carry the ark into exile. Yahweh was of course not restricted or bound to the ark, but since it was a symbol of his special presence he continued to be specially present with it, even when it went into exile. In Philistia Yahweh, the God of Israel, then defeated Dagon, the god of the Philistines, and he brought judgment on the Philistines through plague and infestation, until they finally decided, after seven months, to just send the ark away, back to Israel, while also making offerings to Yahweh that were intended as a way of asking for his pardon, so that he might end his judgment on them. They asked their diviners how they should send the ark back and were told to make offerings of gold in the shapes of the instruments Yahweh had used to defeat them: tumors and mice. They were then given a test to set up to confirm that it really was Yahweh who had done this thing – placing the ark on a cart attached to two cows that had never been yoked and that would want to return to their calves. The Philistines’ idea was that they would see if Yahweh would really drive the cows to pull the cart with the ark on it back to Israel, specifically to the town of Beth-shemesh. We will re-enter our story when the Philistines are setting this up, we will see Yahweh, victorious over Dagon and the Philistines, riding back to Israel like a conquering king. And then we will see how things go when he is reunited with his people, Israel. As in the past, while I read, I’ll be restoring the Hebrew name for the Christian God, “Yahweh” where it has been replaced with the title “the LORD” in our translation tradition. Let’s turn to our text, 1 Samuel 6:10-7:2 … 6:10 The men did so [that is, the Philistines did as their religious leaders advised them to do with the ark of Yahweh], and took two milk cows and yoked them to the cart and shut up their calves at home. 11 And they put the ark of Yahweh on the cart and the box with the golden mice and the images of their tumors. 12 And the cows went straight in the direction of Beth-shemesh along one highway, lowing as they went. They turned neither to the right nor to the left, and the 1 lords of the Philistines went after them as far as the border of Beth-shemesh. 13 Now the people of Beth-shemesh were reaping their wheat harvest in the valley. And when they lifted up their eyes and saw the ark, they rejoiced to see it. 14 The cart came into the field of Joshua of Beth- shemesh and stopped there. A great stone was there. And they split up the wood of the cart and offered the cows as a burnt offering to Yahweh. 15 And the Levites took down the ark of Yahweh and the box that was beside it, in which were the golden figures, and set them upon the great stone. And the men of Beth-shemesh offered burnt offerings and sacrificed sacrifices on that day to Yahweh.16 And when the five lords of the Philistines saw it, they returned that day to Ekron. 17 These are the golden tumors that the Philistines returned as a guilt offering to Yahweh: one for Ashdod, one for Gaza, one for Ashkelon, one for Gath, one for Ekron, 18 and the golden mice, according to the number of all the cities of the Philistines belonging to the five lords, both fortified cities and unwalled villages. The great stone beside which they set down the ark of Yahweh is a witness to this day in the field of Joshua of Beth-shemesh. 19 And he [that is, God,] struck some of the men of Beth-shemesh, because they looked upon the ark of Yahweh. He struck seventy men of them, and the people mourned because Yahweh had struck the people with a great blow. 20 Then the men of Beth-shemesh said, “Who is able to stand before Yahweh, this holy God? And to whom shall he go up away from us?” 21 So they sent messengers to the inhabitants of Kiriath-jearim, saying, “The Philistines have returned the ark of Yahweh. Come down and take it up to you.” 7:1And the men of Kiriath-jearim came and took up the ark of Yahweh and brought it to the house of Abinadab on the hill. And they consecrated his son Eleazar to have charge of the ark of Yahweh.2 From the day that the ark was lodged at Kiriath-jearim, a long time passed, some twenty years, and all the house of Israel lamented after Yahweh. This is God’s Word. Our text, coming where it is in the larger story … is a bit of a downer. We come off the high of Yahweh, the God of Israel, defeating his and Israel’s enemies, he returns triumphant, the people rejoice … and then God strikes and kills 70 Israelites. What’s going on here? While God has been victorious, there are still problems in Israel, and there are still problems in how they relate to God. Remember – that’s part of what got this all started in the first place – the way Israel treated God in 1 Samuel 4. The problem that our text points to is Israel’s difficulty dwelling with a God who is both transcendent and imminent – Israel’s failure to adopt the proper pattern for living with a God who is both holy and near. Israel seems to be prepared to live with a god who is one or the other, who is either near and imminent, or who is holy and transcendent. They know what those patterns of life would look like. But they are unprepared to relate to a God who is both. And Yahweh, the God of Israel, the maker of heaven and earth, is both. Let’s look a little more closely at their struggle with this – let’s consider first their failure to live with God’s transcendence, his holiness, and then second their failure to accept God’s imminence, his nearness. So first – how does Israel fail to recognize, to live rightly with, God’s transcendence – his holiness, his honor, his majesty? 2 The key is in verse 19 – they looked upon the ark of Yahweh. Now, according to some commentators the Hebrew could be understood as saying that the Israelites looked into the ark [Jordan; Leithart,64; Finch, 101] or that they looked at it [Leithert, 64; Davis, 65]. So, the people at Beth-shemesh did one of three things: They either lifted the lid off the ark and looked into it, or the ark had been covered and they uncovered it, or the ark came back from Philistia uncovered, and they failed to cover it. [Davis, 65] Now – whichever one it was, why is it such a big deal? Why does it matter? First, we need to keep in mind that the ark was considered the throne of God, and that it represented his special presence. This was not news to Israel – it’s why they brought the ark into battle in the first place! So, all of Israel knew that the ark was to be treated with special deference because of its association with Yahweh. It communicated Yahweh’s presence, and so showing deference and respect to the ark was a way of showing your deference and respect to Yahweh. Similarly, showing disrespect to the ark was an expression of disrespect to Yahweh. And so that there wouldn’t be any guess work, God had specifically told them how he wanted them to honor the ark, or, we might say, how he wanted them to honor his holiness through how they treated the ark. In Numbers 4:1-20 specific instructions are given on the care of the ark. When it is not veiled in the tabernacle, we are told that the ark is always to be covered. In verses 16-20 of Numbers 4 God even stresses this point – it says “7 Yahweh spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying, 18 ‘Let not the tribe of the clans of the Kohathites [that’s the Levitical clan assigned to caring for the ark] be destroyed from among the Levites, 19 but deal thus with them, that they may live and not die when they come near to the most holy things: Aaron and his sons shall go in and appoint them each to his task and to his burden, 20 but they shall not go in to look on the holy things even for a moment, lest they die.’” God had warned the Israelites, the Levites specifically, to be sure to cover the ark, lest they be struck down in judgment.
Recommended publications
  • Cities of Refuge
    Calvary Baptist Theological Journal 14.1 (Spring, 1998) 1-25 Copyright © 1999 by Calvary Baptist Theological Seminary, cited with permission; digitally prepared for use at Gordon College] Cities of Refuge Preston L. Mayes Much of the Mosaic legislation contained in the Pentateuch seems foreign to the modern reader. The laws concerning the priesthood, the sacrificial system, and the religious holidays are neither practiced nor paralleled in the dispensation of the church. Though they do have didactic and illustrative value as types of the work of Christ, they are often rushed over or skipped altogether in personal Bible study. The Old Testament legislation concerning so-called moral law has received greater attention. Since it addresses many issues which are also social problems in the twentieth century, it is frequently lifted from its Old Testament context and applied to contemporary society. Provisions for dealing with cases of adultery, homosexuality, theft, and murder in Israel are a few of the regulations which commonly receive such treatment. Several minority political/religious groups even advocate a complete return to Old Testament-style political regulations and policies. It is within the context of this debate that the Old Testament legal provisions concerning the city of refuge should be studied. These cities were designated locations to which one who was guilty of accidental homicide1 could flee in order to receive legal protection and a fair trial. They were part of the ancient legal system which recognized the right and even the l This paper will refer to an accidental homicide as manslaughter and a deliberate homicide as murder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conquest of the Promised Land: Joshua
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Brief Explanation of the Technical Resources Used in the “You Can Understand the Bible” Commentary Series .............................................i Brief Definitions of Hebrew Grammatical Forms Which Impact Exegesis.............. iii Abbreviations Used in This Commentary........................................ix A Word From the Author: How This Commentary Can Help You.....................xi A Guide to Good Bible Reading: A Personal Search for Verifiable Truth ............. xiii Geographical Locations in Joshua.............................................xxi The Old Testament as History............................................... xxii OT Historiography Compared with Contemporary Near Eastern Cultures.............xxvi Genre and Interpretation: Old Testament Narrative............................. xxviii Introduction to Joshua ................................................... 1 Joshua 1.............................................................. 7 Joshua 2............................................................. 22 Joshua 3............................................................. 31 Joshua 4............................................................. 41 Joshua 5............................................................. 51 Joshua 6............................................................. 57 Joshua 7............................................................. 65 Joshua 8............................................................. 77 Joshua 9............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15
    A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15 Von der Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig angenommene D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOCTRIX PHILOSOPHIAE (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von SandyJo Dorothea Rogers geboren am 15.08.1979 in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, the United States of America Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Schüle Dr. habil. Takayoshi Oshima Tag der Verteidigung: 11. Mai 2020 ii Selbständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte fremde Hilfe angefertigt zu haben. Ich habe keine anderen als die im Schriftenverzeichnis angeführten Quellen benutzt und sämtliche Textstellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten oder unveröffentlichten Schriften entnommen wurden, und alle Angaben, die auf mündlichen Auskünften beruhen, als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ebenfalls sind alle von anderen Personen bereitgestellten Materialien oder erbrachten Dienstleistungen als solche gekennzeichnet. I hereby declare that I have completed the present dissertation independently and without unauthorized assistance. I have not used any sources other than those listed in the bibliography and I have marked as such all passages of text taken literally or in spirit from published or unpublished writings and all information based on oral information. All materials or services provided by other persons are also marked as such. Leipzig, am 30.01.2020 SandyJo Dorothea Rogers Abstract The clean-slate acts of the Hebrew Bible, i.e., the Year of Jubilee in Leviticus 25 and the Šemittah Year and the Law of Slave Release in Deut 15:1-18, are a part of the tradition of clean-slate acts in the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • NO'l'es on the AN'l'iquities of the BOOK of JOSHUA. by Lieut.-Colonel CONDER, LL.D., RE
    161 NO'l'ES ON THE AN'l'IQUITIES OF THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By Lieut.-Colonel CONDER, LL.D., RE. Gilgal.-lt has been argued that there is a double narrative in the account of the passage of Jordan and of the erection of a monument of twelve stones. One such monument was erected at Gilgal (" the circle"), the other is supposed to have been erected in the bed of the Jordan, the two accounts being thought by some critics to be distinct stories. It is not very evident what would be the object of putting np a monu­ ment which would never be seen, under the Jordan. The Septuagint and the V ulgate understood it so, and added the word " other," making "twelve other stones," but it seems probable that the references are all to one monument at Gilgal as follows :- " And the children of Israel .... took up twelve stones out of the midst of Jordan . and carried them over with them to the place where they lodged, and set them ( □ in~,) there. And twelve stones Joshua raised ( □ ,p:,) amid Jordan (from) beneath (,nn,n), the standing place of the priests bearing the Ark of the Covenant, and they are there (tl'l!l') unto this day" (Joshua iv, 8, 9). "And the twelve stones that they took out of Jordan Joshua raised (O,pi1) in a Gilgal" (verse 20). There is ·no mention of "other" stones in the Hebrew, and, if they were set up in the place where the priests stood in Jordan, we should have expected to read "raised over (Sy) the place," not ''under" (.liM.li), the "station of the feet" (',s~-, ::J.
    [Show full text]
  • Netscape: CITIES of the LEVITES
    CITIES OF THE LEVITES by Doug Goins This is a season of change at PBC. We have some exciting new opportunities at hand that are the culmination of a two-year process for the board of elders and the pastoral staff. We studied our doctrinal statement together for almost a year, and then we began to talk about its implications for PBC in terms of our unique identity and priorities. The culmination of all that was the writing of a vision statement that identifies three priorities that we are recommitting ourselves to: "As a local church, operating under the direction of Jesus as Lord and Head, Peninsula Bible Church is called to serve God in three ways: · to serve Him directly in worship; · to serve His redeemed people in nurture; · to serve His lost world in witness." The vision statement briefly amplifies those three priorities as follows: We desire to be a worshipping church, "gathering corporately in adoring veneration of God as a response of love and living our individual lives in obedient service to our Lord as living sacrifices." We desire to be a nurturing church, "training and equipping believers for growth in spiritual maturity." We desire to be a witnessing church, "creatively reaching out collectively and individually to a lost world with the evangel (good news, gospel) of salvation in Jesus Christ." As pastors and elders of PBC, we've been praying together, asking God to bring us into a healthier balance of worship, nurture, and witness. Last week as I was studying to preach on Joshua 21, I discovered that God sovereignly set aside forty-eight cities for the tribe of Levi and scattered them throughout the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Started with Joshua, by Dr. Ted Hildebrandt
    1 Getting Started with Joshua By Ted Hildebrandt Copyright © 2012 Introduction to Joshua The book of Joshua is named after its main character--Joshua the son of Nun. Joshua served as Moses’ young aide who accompanied Moses as he entered God’s presence in the tent of meeting (Exod 33:11). He was originally named “Hoshea” (“salvation”) but Moses renamed him “Joshua” (“Yahweh saves,” Num 13:16). The Greek translation for “Joshua” is “Jesus.” Joshua’s first act was as a military leader defeating the Amalekites (Exod 17:8-13). He then accompanied Moses up Mount Sinai when Moses received the law (Exod 24:13) and was chosen to represent his tribe of Ephraim as one of the twelve spies who were sent out from Kadesh Barnea to reconnoiter the Promised Land (Numb 13-14). He and Caleb were the two who stood strong against the majority report that rejected going up and taking the land. He was Moses’ handpicked successor (Num 27:12-22) and many believe he may have recorded the events of Moses’ death in Deuteronomy 34. In the text of Joshua there is an implicit comparison made between Moses and Joshua by parallel events. They both parted waters (Red Sea, Jordan River; Josh 4:23). Both circumcised their “people” prior to beginning major acts of redemption (Exod 4:24- 25; Josh 5:13-15). Both met an angel and were told to take off their sandals because they were standing on holy ground (Exod 3:5; Josh 5:15). Both won battles holding a staff/javelin in their uplifted hands (Exod 17:9-11; Josh 8:18).
    [Show full text]
  • The Obed-Edom's in 1 Chronicles
    The Obed-edoms in First Chronicles – Floyd Nolen Jones, Th.D., Ph.D. The Obed-edom with whom the Ark of the Covenant was left for three months after the death of Uzza is said to have been a “Gittite” (or Gathite, 1 Chr. 13:13–14). This means he could have been a Philistine from Gath who accepted Jehovah as his God, moved to Israel and probably later became a member of David’s bodyguard (i.e., a Cherethite). Still, in view of the Ark’s having been captured and kept seven months in Philistia (1 Sam. 5–6), it seems unlikely that David would have deposited it with any Philistine. Moreover, the context in the Book of First Chronicles is unmistakable. Chapter 13 verse 14 states that the house of Obed-edom the Gittite was “blessed” by the LORD for his having kept the Ark for three months. Now at 1 Chronicles 26:1, 4–5, and 8 (also vs. 15) we find an Obed-edom who was a porter of the family of the Korahites,1 and verse 5 records that “God blessed him”. We take this connection as being one of the main keys for identifying the various Obed-edoms in this section of Scripture. Consequently, these men are one and the same. Further, he was a Levite from the levitical city of Gath-rimmon (thus a Gittite) located in the tribe of Dan (Josh. 19:40, 45). It should and must be acknowledged that the Obed-edom who took in the Ark of God is the major person by that name that appears in First Chronicles.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's First Competitive Business Model (Hint: It Was Divine)
    of Socia al lo rn m u ic o s J Journal of Socialomics Ben-Menachem, J Socialomics 2016, 5:4 ISSN: 2167-0358 DOI: 10.41 72/2167-0358.1000186 Research Article Open Access The World's First Competitive Business Model (Hint: it was Divine) Mordechai Ben-Menachem* Carob Tree Technologies Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel *Corresponding author: Mordechai Ben-Menachem, Carob Tree Technologies Ltd, 91530, Quality MBM, Jerusalem, Israel, Tel: 055-2259763, E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: Oct 02, 2016; Acc date: Oct 25, 2016; Pub date: Oct 30, 2016 Copyright: © 2016. Ben-Menachem M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Abstract Lemma: The wealth of King Solomon is well documented and testified in many documents-not ‘just’ Hebrew documents, but also those of other nations. From where did this exemplary wealth derive? The land of Israel is not extraordinarily fertile, nor large, nor blessed with any ‘outstanding’, resource. Solomon did not have obvious mining operations (despite Rider Haggard’s “King Solomon’s Mines” and other such fictional works). All nations at that time were agricultural. If Israel was ‘simply’ an agricultural economy, like all others, particularly with the limited rainfall common to the land then there could not be wealth accrual. Israel is dependent upon local rains and does not have extensive water sources flowing in, such as the Nile Valley or Mesopotamia. In a bad rain-year, there would be hunger, not wealth! Farms were like everyone and everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • 57 Valley of Ajalon
    Places to be visited – “In the steps of the Master” tour 2015 2 Chron. 28:18 – taken by the Philistines 57 Valley of Ajalon Isaiah alludes to the miracle in the greater victory soon to be won under Joshua’s namesake Jesus … Names (also known as) The sun shall be no more thy light by day; Ajalon, also spelled Aijalon or Ayalon; neither for brightness shall the moon give Yalo also transliterated Yalu; light unto thee: but the LORD shall be אַ יָּלוֹן :Hebrew unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God , ي ال و :Arabic thy glory. (Isa. 60:19) Etymology New Testament ‘Place of the fallow deer’. None Location/Description Famous characters The valley of Ajalon is 22 km northwest of Adoni-zedek Jerusalem and 13 km southeast of Ramla in Joshua Israel (not to be confused with Ramallah in Jonathan the West Bank). It is a wide valley leading Rehoboam from the coastal belt through the lowlands to the Judean hills (the Shephelah) at the foot of the Beth-Horon pass. The Valley of Ajalon seen from Gezer Brief history Five Amorite kings, under Adoni-zedek, king of Jerusalem, mounted a vengeful attack on the Gibeonites for their surrender to Israel (Josh. 10:1-5). It is represented by the modern town of Yalo. In response to the Gibeonite appeal, Joshua There is another town called Ajalon (Aijalon) makes a forced march of about 25 kms to in the allotment of Zebulon where Elon the launch a surprise attack from the east (v.6-9). judge of Israel was buried (Jud.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Kiriath-Jearim
    The City of Kiriath-jearim Topics: Preface Hebrew Location The Modern Location of Kiriath-jearim Scriptural References Bibliography Charts: Why was the Ark sent to Kiriath-jearim? Preface: The City of Kiriath-jearim is one of the more fascinating cities of Biblical history. It was initially inhabited by the Gibeonites, who, in deceit, forged a bond of peace with the Israelites so that they would not be eradicated by the Israelites on their path of destruction throughout the Land of Promise. When the boundaries of the tribes of Israel were set, Kiriath-jearim was on the border of Benjamin, Dan and Judah (there were about eight points at which three of the Israeli territories intersection). When the Ark of God had been captured by the Philistines, the Philistines were struck by the devastating hand of God, causing them to relinquish their hold of the Ark. The Ark was first taken to Beth-shemesh, where too many of the Israelites there treated it casually, behaving like curiosity-driven rubes looking inside to confirm what was in there. After a substantial portion of Beth-shemesh died, the Ark was shipped northward to the nearest major city, Kiriath-jearim. It is important that you have a feel for the context of this doctrine. The Philistines captured the Ark of God and brought it to three of their principal cities. In each city, they were invaded by rodents which were probably infected by the bubonic plague. After each city suffered great human loss, they moved the Ark along to another Philistine city until the citizens of Ekron said that the Ark needed to be returned to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • The 4Th Tribe of Israel, Judah Worship and Praise Genesis 29:35 the Leader
    The 4 th Tribe of Israel, Judah Worship and Praise Genesis 29:35 The Leader Genesis 29:35: And she (Leah) conceived again, and bore a son: and she said, Now will I praise the LORD: therefore she called his name Judah... Judah means ‘Yehuwdah or Yahdah’ ‘praise, to throw, shoot, cast, down, give thanks, laud, to confess, confess (name of God), to hold out the hand, and to bemoan (by the wringing of the hands). No one can travail with great weeping’s and groaning than the sons of Judah. Bemoan by the wringing of the hands. To revere or worship with extended hands. By the name, we see the complexity of the nature of Judah. Consecration ministry. The power praise and worship in the character of the tribe of Judah. Judah releases the sound of heaven that carries the revival. Judahites lift us to the throne room of God, because they are throne room people. But they are only this, as they come into perfection and into the likeness of Jesus, the perfect son of Judah, the "Lion" of their tribe. Judah’s name also includes the four letter of God’s Name YHWH. 4th Tribe of Israel, Judah page 2 Symbol Of Judah Is The Lion Genesis 49:8-12: ¶Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father's children shall bow down before thee. Judah is a lion's (GUR) whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion (ARAH), and as an old lion (LEBOAWTH); who shall rouse him up..
    [Show full text]
  • 162 Notes on Antiquities of the Book of Judges
    162 NOTES o:-;r ANTIQUITIES OF THE BOOK OF JUDGES. The writer continues:-" And the sun was (dark?) and the moon remained." "So the sun was (dark?) in mid-heaven and l1asted not to come out nearly all day" (verse 13). The Hivite~.-There is no account of the conquest of Central Palestine. The cities that submitted (Joshua ix, J 7) were Hivite cities (v. 7), and the inhabitants of Shechem were Hivites (Gen. xxxiv, 2). Perhaps, therefore, the submission of the Hivite league led to that of the country round Shechem. NOTES ON ANTIQUITIES OF THE BOOK OF JUDGES. By Lieut.-Colonel Co:rnER, LL.D., R.E. Bochim.-N otbing is known of this site, except that it was above Gilgal, and a place of sacrifice (Judges ii; I, 5); the word means "weepers," and may be connected with Allon Bachuth (Gen. xxxv, 8), "the oak of weeping." The latter was at Bethel, and Bethel was the place of religious meeting in the time of the Judges (Judges xx, 27). The Levites.-lt has been said that the Levites are represented as being members of other tribes (Judges xvii, 7), but the term Gur, applied to the Levite in this case, proves the contrary. The Gur (Arabic Jdr, A.V. "sojourner") means properly the man of any tribe living in another tribe. In the present case the Levite lived "among the family" (r,ME:l'tV''QD) of Judah, and sought (verse 9) to become a gur anywhere else where he might be accepted. The Levite, who was gur in Ephraim, might, however, be connected by marriage with the tribe of Judah (Judges xix, 1).
    [Show full text]