Arxiv:2007.08994V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 21 Dec 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MNRAS 000,1–39 (2020) Preprint 22 December 2020 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0 Hector´ Gil-Mar´ın1;2?, Julian´ E. Bautista3, Romain Paviot4, Mariana Vargas-Magana˜ 5, Sylvain de la Torre4, Sebastien Fromenteau6, Shadab Alam7, Santiago Avila´ 8, Eti- enne Burtin9, Chia-Hsun Chuang10, Kyle S. Dawson 11, Jiamin Hou12, Arnaud de Mattia9, Faizan G. Mohammad13;14, Eva-Maria Muller¨ 15, Seshadri Nadathur3, Richard Neveux9, Will J. Percival13;14;16, Anand Raichoor17, Mehdi Rezaie18, Ashley J. Ross18, Graziano Rossi19, Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider9, Alex Smith9, Amelie´ Tamone17, Jeremy L. Tinker20, Rita Tojeiro21, Yuting Wang22, Gong-Bo Zhao22; 3, Cheng Zhao17, Jonathan Brinkmann23, Joel R. Brownstein11, Peter D. Choi19, Stephanie Escoffier24, Axel de la Macorra5, Jeongin Moon19, Jeffrey A. Newman25, Donald P. Schneider26, Hee-Jong Seo18, Mariappan Vivek26;27 1 Institut de Ciencies` del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona, ICCUB, Mart´ı i Franques` 1, E08028 Barcelona, Spain 2 Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), E08034 Barcelona, Spain 3 Institute of Cosmology & Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Dennis Sciama Building, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, United Kingdom 4 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, France. 5 Instituto de F´ısica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Apdo. Postal 20-364, Ciudad de Mexico,´ Mexico´ 6 Instituto de Ciencias F´ısicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Av. Universidad s/n, 62210 Cuernavaca, Mor., Mexico 7 Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, United Kingdom 8 Instituto de F´ısica Teorica´ UAM/CSIC, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain 9 IRFU/CEA Universite´ Paris-Saclay, F91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 10 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 11 Department Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, 115 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 12 Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, Giessenbachstr., 85748 Garching bei Munchen,¨ Germany 13 Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada 14 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada 15 University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom 16 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. North, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada 17 Institute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Observatoire de Sauverny, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland 18 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Clippinger Labs, Athens, OH 45701, USA 19 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747, Korea 20 Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA 21 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, United Kingdom 22 National Astronomy Observatories, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100012, P.R. China 23 Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349 24 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France 25 PITT PACC, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA 26 Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 27 Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala, Bangalore 560034, India arXiv:2007.08994v2 [astro-ph.CO] 21 Dec 2020 Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form 22 December 2020 ? [email protected] © 2020 The Authors 2 H. Gil-Mar´ın et al. ABSTRACT We analyse the clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 16 luminous red galaxy sample (DR16 eBOSS LRG) in combination with the high redshift tail of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III Baryon Oscilla- tion Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12 (DR12 BOSS CMASS). We measure the redshift space distortions (RSD) and also extract the longitudinal and transverse baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale from the anisotropic power spectrum signal inferred from 377,458 galaxies between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0, with effective redshift of zeff = 0:698 and effec- tive comoving volume of 2:72 Gpc3. After applying reconstruction we measure the BAO scale and infer DH (zeff )=rdrag = 19:30 ± 0:56 and DM (zeff )=rdrag = 17:86 ± 0:37. When we perform a redshift space distortions analysis on the pre-reconstructed catalogue on the monopole, quadrupole and hexadecapole we find, DH (zeff )=rdrag = 20:18 ± 0:78, DM (zeff )=rdrag = 17:49 ± 0:52 and fσ8(zeff ) = 0:454 ± 0:046. We combine both sets of results along with the measurements in configuration space and report the following consensus values: DH (zeff )=rdrag = 19:77 ± 0:47, DM (zeff )=rdrag = 17:65 ± 0:30 and fσ8(zeff ) = 0:473 ± 0:044, which are in full agreement with the standard ΛCDM and GR predictions. These results represent the most precise measurements within the redshift range 0:6 6 z 6 1:0 and are the culmination of more than 8 years of SDSS observations. Key words: cosmology: cosmological parameters – cosmology: large-scale structure of the Universe anisotropic multipoles of the power spectrum or correlation func- tion. Under the assumption of a functional form of the background expansion, H(z;Ωm) one can obtain a direct measurement of the density of matter in the Universe Ωm. Note that the BAO peak po- 1 INTRODUCTION sition is not directly sensitive to H(z), but to H(z)rdrag, and to the The large-scale structure of the Universe (LSS) contains valuable comoving angular diameter distance over the comoving sound hori- information of how the Universe has been evolving in the last zon at the epoch where the baryon-drag optical depth equals unity, 9 ∼ 7 × 10 years, when the Dark Energy domination era started. DM (z)=rdrag. From these measurements one can either infer Ωm The current state-of-the-art spectroscopic LSS observations allow from the product of the two (which is independent of rdrag), or as- to utilise the standard ruler baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), first sume an extra prior on rdrag, which can either come from cosmic detected in Eisenstein et al.(2005) on the Sloan Digital Sky Sur- microwave background (CMB) measurements, or from a functional vey dataset (SDSS) and Cole et al.(2005) on the two-degree Field form of rdrag given by priors on the baryon, Ωb and radiation den- Survey (2dF, Colless et al. 2003), to determine with precision the sity Θrad (which are typically not measured by LSS), and infer background expansion history of the Universe at late-time. During H0 (see for e.g. Addison et al. 2018). Within the SDSS collabo- the last decade the BAO technique has evolved in both precision ration we opt to analyse these results under the less restrictive set and accuracy becoming mature. Consequently a plethora of mea- of priors, and thus only assume a functional form for H(z), but no surements have been performed on spectroscopic galaxy surveys restriction on rdrag as a function of cosmology. The motivation for at different epochs: 6-degree Field Survey (6dF; Jones et al. 2009; proceeding this way is the robustness of the cosmological interpre- Beutler et al. 2011) at z = 0:106, WiggleZ (Drinkwater et al. 2010; tation under potential changes of the cosmological paradigm if, for Blake et al. 2011b; Kazin et al. 2014) at z = 0:44; 0:6; 0:73, and example, the state-of-the-art value of rdrag changes significantly Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) galaxies (Daw- in the future or ΛCDM is ruled out, as one would just only need son et al. 2013; Anderson et al. 2012, 2014a,b; Alam et al. 2017) at to re-interpret the quantities H(z)rdrag and DM (z)=rdrag rather z = 0:38; 0:51; 0:61, and BOSS Lyman-α forests (Bautista et al. than reanalysing the data. In this paper we choose to work with the 2017; du Mas des Bourboux et al. 2017) at z = 2:40. Addition- ‘Hubble distance’, DH , defined as DH (z) ≡ c=H(z), where c is ally, if we want to obtain a direct measurement of the growth of the speed of light. The parameter DH (z)=rdrag has the advantage structures from these same spectroscopic surveys we need to mea- of being dimensionless, of order unity and directly proportional to sure the effect of redshift space distortions (RSD; Kaiser 1987). the scale factor which is actually measured. Consequently, we obtain both an expansion history and a growth of Redshift space distortions are a measurement of the peculiar structure measurement from the same dataset. Parallel to the BAO velocity field of the galaxies along the line-of-sight (LOS). As technique development, RSD analyses have also matured both in this velocity field is only detected along the LOS, it generates an modelling and observational systematics treatment during the last anisotropic signal in the power spectrum expansion as a function decade: RSD in 2dF (Percival et al. 2004), in 6dF (Beutler et al. of the cosine of the LOS with the vector separation of the galaxy 2012), in WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2011a), in VIPERS (Guzzo et al. pair. This velocity field is generated by over-densities of matter, 2014; de la Torre et al. 2013; Pezzotta et al. 2017), in FastSound and therefore is coherent with the growth of these density pertur- (Okumura et al. 2016), as well in BOSS galaxies (Alam et al. 2017). bations. Thus, by measuring the redshift space distortion effect on Anisotropic BAO studies provide a direct measurement of the power spectrum of galaxies one can set constraints on the log- the background expansion at the epoch of the observed galax- arithmic growth of structure parameter, f.