DOCSLIB.ORG

The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study THE SOUTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY SCENIC RIVER AND HIGHWAY STUDY New Castle County Department of Land Use 1 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study This publication is the most recent in a series of studies that have been compiled to catalog New Castle County’s scenic and historic resources. Christopher A. Coons, County Executive County Council Paul Clark, President Joseph M. Reda, District 1 George Smiley, District 7 Robert S. Weiner, District 2 John J. Cartier, District 8 William J. Tansey, District 3 Timothy P. Sheldon, District 9 Penrose Hollins, District 4 Jea P. Street, District 10 Stephanie A. McClellan, District 5 David L. Tackett, District 11 William E. Powers, Jr., District 6 James W. Bell, District 12 Charles L. Baker, General Manager, Land Use Department 2 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study Prepared by The New Castle County Department of Land Use New Castle County, Delaware In conjunction with Gaadt Perspectives, LLC Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania Historic resource information and analysis provided by Center for Historic and Architectural Design (CHAD) University of Delaware Support provided by Wilmington Metropolitan Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) New Castle County January 2008 3 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study Introduction and Executive Summary PURPOSE The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study follows in the tradition of similar studies executed for the Brandywine and Red Clay Valleys north of the C&D Canal. The intent of this study, as with the prior efforts, is to further the County’s growth management planning process by inventorying, interrelating and reinterpreting many of the resources discussed in the County’s Comprehensive Development Plan Updates. The Study goes on to suggest a variety of means by which to protect such resources – natural, historic, and scenic (including scenic roads). The result is a plan that can be used in conjunction with the County Comprehensive Plan Update, as well as with other planning efforts such as the Greater Route 301 MIS study, the Southern New Castle County Circulation planning process, and local municipal plans, to advance the growth management and transportation planning processes in Southern New Castle County. Perhaps the most basic purpose of this study, as with its predecessors, is to familiarize or reacquaint Southern New Castle County residents, and those elsewhere in the County, with the qualities and character inherent to this area. A study such as this, in essence a “slice in time”, helps document a unique set of circumstances singular to one place. Most importantly, however, public awareness of the historic, scenic and natural resources that together form the core components of the character of this place, and which have long been revered, will help heighten interest in future preservation. LOCATION Southern New Castle County includes all land in the County south of the C&D Canal and is approximately 190 square miles, representing 44% of the total area of the County. It lies within the Atlantic Coastal Plain and is relatively flat with major concentrations of prime agricultural soils and critical clusters of both tidal and fresh water wetlands. From a regional perspective, the following counties surround the study area: Cecil and Kent Counties, MD to the west and Kent County, DE to the south. The eastern boundary of the study area is the Delaware River (see Figure 1). Included within the study area are three municipalities – Middletown, Odessa and Townsend – all of which have comprehensive development plans that call for various levels of development. The most extensive of these is Middletown – in large part due to recent annexations, this community has future potential for residential, commercial and industrial uses. 4 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study STUDY METHODOLOGY Like its predecessors, this report is comprised of four main sections. These sections are: Part 1, The Southern New Castle County Planning District in New Castle County; Part 2, Resource, Land Use, and Traffic Management Issues; Part 3, Priorities for Resource Protection; and Part 4, Achieving Resource Protection Objectives. The beginning of Part 1 documents current conditions in Southern New Castle County with respect to land use and public infrastructure (chiefly transportation, wastewater facilities and water supply). The balance consists of detailed inventories of the historic, scenic and natural resources of Southern New Castle County, including GIS maps. These inventories form the basis for the resource protection priorities discussed in Part 3. Part 2 examines the resource management issues facing the study area in light of a changing development pattern. Issues range from resource protection to agricultural retention to transportation and traffic management. Part 3 goes through the process of prioritizing and targeting those resources (or concentrations of resources) that are in most need of short-term protection. Initially, the resource inventories are reviewed and composited to reaffirm important resources and illustrate where resources converge or concentrate. This set of protection targets is further refined by eliminating certain “givens” (lands developed, lands committed to development, and public lands) and identifying properties under institutional ownership. A final factor is the amount and location of vacant land expected to be developed or known to be under development pressure (areas targeted for growth, areas where infrastructure exists, etc.); for the most part, this equates to the investment strategy mapping adopted by the state, County, and WILMAPCO (and which is somewhat synonymous with the County’s identified sewer service area). The result of this process is a composite of resources considered first-priority targets for protection. These targets consist principally of stream corridors and their riparian buffers, selected scenic road corridors, and high quality natural, scenic and/or historic resource areas or areas of resource concentrations. In Part 4, a variety of techniques for resource protection are described in the context of Southern New Castle County. Some of these techniques are also described in the County’s 2007 Comprehensive Development Plan Update and are partially reflected in the County’s Unified Development Code (UDC). Among the techniques discussed are: zoning and related land use controls; site planning and conservation design techniques; private land stewardship actions; historic resource protection measures; transportation planning considerations (principally road planning); and interagency cooperation. 5 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study also includes inventory maps of scenic, historic and natural resources, maps of prioritized resources and scenic roads, and appendices containing a detailed inventory of historic resources, a roster of visual accents, vista points and visual intrusions, and details of a recommended scenic road network. 6 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study 7 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................4 PART 1 Southern New Castle County..........................................................................................10 1.1 Land Use and Public Infrastructure 1.2 Historic Resources Inventory 1.3 Scenic Resources Inventory 1.4 Natural Resources Inventory PART 2 Resource, Land Use, and Traffic Management Issues .................................................79 2.1 Historic, Scenic, and Natural Resource Protection 2.2 Agricultural Issues 2.3 Traffic Management Issues 2.4 Sewer and Water Infrastructure 2.5 Inter-Agency Cooperation PART 3 Priorities for Resource Protection..................................................................................94 3.1 Refinements to the Resource Inventories 3.2 Composite of Significant Resources 3.3 Committed and Protected Lands 3.4 The Scenic Road Network 3.5 First-Priority Resource Protection Targets PART 4 Achieving Resource Protection Objectives..................................................................107 4.1 Public Regulation and Site Planning Techniques 4.2 Public Purchase and Private Land Stewardship Options 4.3 Historic Resource Protection 4.4 Transportation Planning 4.5 Coordination and Management Among Public Agencies APPENDICES ...............................................................................................................120 Appendix 1 – Visual Accents, Vista Points and Visual Intrusions 8 The Southern New Castle County Scenic River and Highway Study Appendix 2 – Standing Properties in Designated Scenic Views Appendix 3 – Demolished Properties in Designated Scenic Views Appendix 4 – Scenic Roads in Southern New Castle County Appendix 5 – Selected References FIGURES Figure 1 - Study Area Figure 2 - Uncommitted Land Figure 3 – Geographic Zones Figure 4 – Delaware Map of Hundreds Figure 5 - Historic Resources Figure 6 - Scenic Resources Figure 7 - Natural Resources Figure 8 – Composite Map of Historic, Scenic & Natural Resources Figure 9 - Ownership Status Figure 10 - First Priority Resources for Protection TABLES Table 1 –
Recommended publications
  • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 the Council Meeting Was Held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018

    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 the Council Meeting Was Held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018

    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 The Council meeting was held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mr. John Sisson, Council Chair, opened the meeting at 6:35 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Members present: David Edgell, representing Connie Holland, Delaware Governor’s Appointee Gwinneth Kaminsky, representing Herb Inden, representing City of Wilmington Mayor, Michael S. Purzycki Heather Murphy, Maryland Governor’s Appointee Antoni Sekowski, representing Rich Hall, representing New Castle County Executive, Matthew Meyer Eric Sennstrom, representing Cecil County Executive, Alan McCarthy John Sisson, Delaware Transit Corporation Chief Executive Officer Michael Spencer, representing New Castle County Municipalities Joshua Thomas, representing Drew Boyce, representing Jennifer L. Cohan, DelDOT Secretary of Transportation Members absent: Mayor Robert Alt, representing Cecil County Municipalities Guests, Observers: None. Staff members: Dan Blevins, Principal Planner Janet Butler, Administrative Assistant Heather Dunigan, Principal Planner Sharen T. Elcock, Executive Assistant Dave Gula, Principal Planner Randi Novakoff, Outreach Manager Bill Swiatek, Principal Planner Jacob Thompson, Transportation Planner Tigist Zegeye, Executive Director Minutes prepared by Janet Butler 3. MINUTES: The July 12, 2018 meeting minutes were approved with a correction in the Council Member’s Reports, Mr. Hall said “decrease” not “increase” parking. ACTION: On motion by Mr. Sennstrom seconded by Mr. Spencer the Council approved the July 12, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, with correction. Motion passed. (9-13-18–01) 1 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: None. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ AND DIRECTOR’S REPORT: 4. Chairperson’s Report: Mr. Sisson said DART December Service Changes public sessions will be held on Tuesday, September 18, 2018, from 11:00 a.m.
  • Walk It – Bike It – Share It

    Walk It – Bike It – Share It

    CITY OF MILFORD WALK IT – BIKE IT – SHARE IT Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan | Gary Norris, AICP Table of Contents Needs ..................................................................................................... 26 I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .......................................................... 3 Typical Facilities .................................................................................... 27 The Importance of Walking and Bicycling .......................................... 3 Pedestrian Goals and Objectives ........................................................ 28 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................................... 5 Bicycles .................................................................................................. 30 Existing Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 5 Goal ................................................................................. 30 Purpose .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Le Tour Bicyclists .......................................... 30 Content .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Spare Tire Bicyclists ...................................... 30 Bicycle Level of Service ....................................................................... 13 Objectives for Kickstand Bicyclists ....................................... 31
  • Eastern Europe

    Eastern Europe

    NAZI PLANS for EASTE RN EUR OPE A Study of Lebensraum Policies SECRET NAZI PLANS for EASTERN EUROPE A Study of Lebensraum Policies hy Ihor Kamenetsky ---- BOOKMAN ASSOCIATES :: New York Copyright © 1961 by Ihor Kamenetsky Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 61-9850 MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY UNITED PRINTING SERVICES, INC. NEW HAVEN, CONN. TO MY PARENTS Preface The dawn of the twentieth century witnessed the climax of imperialistic competition in Europe among the Great Pow­ ers. Entrenched in two opposing camps, they glared at each other over mountainous stockpiles of weapons gathered in feverish armament races. In the one camp was situated the Triple Entente, in the other the Triple Alliance of the Central Powers under Germany's leadership. The final and tragic re­ sult of this rivalry was World War I, during which Germany attempted to realize her imperialistic conception of M itteleuropa with the Berlin-Baghdad-Basra railway project to the Near East. Thus there would have been established a transcontinental highway for German industrial and commercial expansion through the Persian Gull to the Asian market. The security of this highway required that the pressure of Russian imperi­ alism on the Middle East be eliminated by the fragmentation of the Russian colonial empire into its ethnic components. Germany· planned the formation of a belt of buffer states ( asso­ ciated with the Central Powers and Turkey) from Finland, Beloruthenia ( Belorussia), Lithuania, Poland to Ukraine, the Caucasus, and even to Turkestan. The outbreak and nature of the Russian Revolution in 1917 offered an opportunity for Imperial Germany to realize this plan.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 22/Thursday, February 3

    Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 22/Thursday, February 3

    5720 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 22 / Thursday, February 3, 2005 / Notices 1), Federal Aviation Administration, wish to receive confirmation that the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 800 Independence Avenue, SW., FAA received your comments, include a Robert F. Kleinburd, Realty and Washington, DC 20591. self-addressed, stamped postcard. Environmental Program Manager, This notice is published pursuant to You may also submit comments Federal Highway Administration, 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. through the Internet to http:// Delaware Division, J. Allen Frear Issued in Washington, DC, on January 28, dms.dot.gov. You may review the public Federal Building, 300 South New Street, 2005. docket containing the petition, any Room 2101, Dover, DE 19904; Anthony F. Fazio, comments received, and any final Telephone: (302) 734–2966; or Mr. Mark Director, Office of Rulemaking. disposition in person in the Dockets Tudor, P.E., Project Manager, Delaware Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Department of Transportation, 800 Bay Petition for Exemption Monday through Friday, except Federal Road, P.O. Box 778, Dover, DE 19903; Docket No.: FAA–2005–20139. holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone Telephone (302) 760–2275. DelDOT Petitioner: Airbus. 1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level Public Relations Office (800) 652–5600 Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR of the NASSIF Building at the (in DE only). 25.841(a)(2)(i) and (ii) and (3). Department of Transportation at the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Description of Relief Sought: To above address. Also, you may review Federal Highway Administration permit certification of the Airbus Model public dockets on the Internet at (FHWA), in cooperation with the A380 airplane without meeting http://dms.dot.gov.
  • 2008 Inter-Regional Report Making Connections Across Our Region’S Borders

    2008 Inter-Regional Report Making Connections Across Our Region’S Borders

    2008 Inter-Regional Report Making Connections Across Our Region’s Borders 2 2008 Inter-Regional Report Prepared by the staff of the Wilmington Area Planning Council Adopted July 10, 2008 The preparation of this document was financed in part with funds provided by the Federal Government, including the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administration of the United States Department of Transportation. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures Who is WILMAPCO? ····························································5 Figure 1: Population Growth by Percent Per Decade, 1990-2030 ....... 7 Executive Summary································································6 Figure 2: Inter-Regional Study Area by County .................................. 9 Introduction·············································································7 Figure 3: Counties in Study Area by Planning Organization............... 10 Section 1: Demographics························································11 Figure 4: Population Estimates by County, 2005................................. 11 Figure 5: Projected Population Change by County, 2000-2030........... 13 Section 2: Traffic & Travel····················································19 Figure 6: Population Change by TAZ, 2005-2030............................... 14 Section 3: Freight and Goods Movement·····························27 Figure 7: Employment Estimates by County, 2005 ............................. 15 Figure 8: Projected Employment Change by County, 2000-2030 ....... 17
  • 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan

    2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan

    Wilmington Area Planning Council 2025 Update CONNECTIONS to the st 21 Century 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Adopted February 23, 2000 Wilmington Area Planning Council 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100 Newark, DE 19711 Phone (302) 737-6205 Email [email protected] Fax (302) 737-9584 Web www.wilmapco.org Wilmington Area Planning Council * Council: Anne P. Canby, Secretary, Delaware Department of Transportation, Chairperson Robert J. Alt, Mayor, City of Elkton, Vice Chair Nelson K. Bolender, President, Cecil County Commissioners Jeffrey W. Bullock, Chief of Staff, Delaware Governor’s Office Thomas P. Gordon, County Executive, New Castle County James F. Grant, Mayor, Town of Odessa Marsha J. Kaiser, Director, Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning & Capital Programming Raymond C. Miller, Director, Delaware Transit Corporation James H. Sills, Jr., Mayor, City of Wilmington Technical Advisory Committee: Public Advisory Committee: Anna Marie Gonnella, Delaware River & Bay Authority, Chairperson Anita Puglisi, City of Newark Citizen, Chairperson Phil Wheeler, Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Barbara Washam, Upper East Side Neighborhood Association, Vice Chair Environmental Control, Vice Chair Doug Andrews, Delmarva Rail Passenger Association Eugene E. Abbott, Delaware Department of Transportation David Blankenship, Wilmington Department of Public Works David Baker, Southern New Castle County Citizen Anthony J. Di Giacomo, Cecil County Office of Planning and Jan Baty, Newark Planning Commission Zoning & Parks and Recreation Lynn Broaddus, Brandywine Hundred Citizen Bobbie Geier, Delaware Transit Corporation Harry Brown, City of Wilmington Citizen Markus R. Gradecak, Maryland Office of Planning John J. Casey, Delaware Contractors Association Herbert M. Inden, Delaware Office of State Planning Bob Dietrich, Delaware Motor Transport Association Coordination Gwinneth Kaminsky Rivera, Wilmington Department of Planning Dennis Flint, White Clay Creek Bicycle Club James P.
  • The Results of the Phase II Deldot Investigations at 7NC-E 53 Indicate

    The Results of the Phase II Deldot Investigations at 7NC-E 53 Indicate

    SITE INTERPRETATIONS The results of the Phase II DelDOT investigations at 7NC-E­ 53 indicate that the historic component of the site is undisturbed and in good condition. The site represents a farmstead and possible landing operation dating from the mid­ eighteenth to nineteenth century, and was owned at one time by a prominent local merchant, John Read. The site was occupied continuously throughout the nineteenth century, yet there is archaeological evidence that middle-to-late eighteenth century deposits are present in good stratigraphic contexts. Much of the site, particularly around the foundation, is unplowed. The historic artifacts recovered show archaeological evidence of historic sheet refuse disposal patterns. WILLIAM DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82) INVESTIGATIONS SITE mSTORY Of all three sites investigated in the Patterson Lane Site Complex, the Dickson Site is the most difficult to trace historically. The site's history is easily followed backwards in time until 1844, then the trail of deed transactions and property transfers becomes murky and fragmentary. Table 8 presents a summary of the deed transactions for the Dickson Site. The property, which is presently owned by William T. Neal, Jr., was acquired by William T. Neal, Sr., in 1919 from George W. Butler of Christiana Village (NCCD N-28-260). Butler had bought the land, which consisted of 5.7 acres, from the heirs of Daniel Heisler Egbert in 1912 for $1000. There was a bUilding present 109 " ' TABLE 8 I DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82), SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS Name (from/to) Reference Date Acreage Cost William T. Neal, WCCH N-28-260 11-15-1919 5.7a $500 from George Butler and wife, WCCH George Butler, WCCH B-24-184 9-11-1912 5.7a $1,000 from Henderson R.
  • New Castle County

    New Castle County

    State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 New Castle County NewStatewide Castle - GrantsCounty & Allocations - Grants & Allocations 204 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Road Systems New Castle County - Road Systems 205 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Expressways New Castle County - Road Systems - Expressways 206 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Project Title Primavera # Project # Glenville Subdivision Improvements 09-00122 T200904401 Project This project involves the reconstruction of the remaining streets and sidewalks in the Glenville Subdivision as a result of DelDOTs Glenville Wetland Bank Project. The project will Description provide a connector road between Harbeson and East Netherfield. Project This project is a continuation of the Glenville Wetland Banking project that will restore the remaining subdivison streets and reconnect the Glenville Subdivision Justification Funding Program ROAD SYSTEMS EXPRESSWAYS Senatorial District(s) 9 Representative District(s) 19 New Castle County - Road Systems - Expressways 207 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Glenville Subdivision Improvements PROJECT AUTHORIZATION SCHEDULE IN ($000) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 PROJECT CURRENT STATE FEDERAL PHASE FUNDING SOURCE NUMBER ESTIMATE TOTAL TOTAL
  • Iron Hill School No. 112C

    Iron Hill School No. 112C

    CEIVED413 NFS Form 10-900 No.1024-001 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service INTERAGENCY RESOURCES NATIONAL PARK This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin ISA). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name : Iron Hill School Number 112C other names/site number : Iron Hill Museum of Natural History: N-13315 2. Location street & number : 1355 Old Baltimore Pike D not for publication city or town : Newark vicinity hundred : Pencader state : Delaware code : DE county : New Castle code : zip code : 19702 3. State IFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this JH nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60, In my opinion, the property j& meets C3 does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide 13 locally.
  • Delawarehousejournal

    Delawarehousejournal

    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE THE LIBRARY \J ...,, ~. ;"'iY/:'4 .!"· ,II /J )' ;!':'. ·,;.r J $·7~ •7.f.-.f'.' J't' ~ JOURNAL OF THE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AT A SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSE:M:BLY, CONVEXED AND HELD AT DOVER, ON TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY, IN THE YEAR OF OUU f,ORD ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY-THREE, AND OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UI\JITED ST ATES, THE SEVENTY.SEVENTH. DOVER, DELAWARE: ~· KIMMEY, PRINTER, 1853. • .. • • • • • • • • • f' • • • • • .v".. :.. ". ·.~;: \ ... :· :·.: =·~: : ·.. : . ... ... ; . .... ,, . .. .. .. \ I . •H., \ ~ ,./, ... ,, .. ·-. ,.., '"1t"- ~. ,.,,.: • '. '.\.., l "" ~ ' , : :·: : :·:: . : : .. : ... : : : ·.•: ... :: ... ........ ... ...... :.-. : .. : ..~: : . : • • • : ... u • ... • : •••• : . ·.: ... ... ... .. .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ··: ... .. =~~:· ... • . ... ... .. •. ... .. ... .. .. ..• _I • . .... ... e .. .. ... .. ... :·:.. .. .... ... Gx,::, -·r. t: \. ~ ~ -~ .. , t \·\' • I cl t.. \·1 --~. ~.. · JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF DELA\VARE. At a sessio11 ef the General Assembly, convened and held at Dover, on Tuesday, the fourth day ef January, in the year ef our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-three, and of the Independence ef the United States ef America, the seventy-seventh. Messrs. James Delaplaine, Jesher H. Dixon, Alexander M. Biddle, Charles Gooding, Joshua S. Vaientine, John A. Reynolds and Ephraim Beaston, of New Castle county; and Messrs. Benjamin L. Collins, John G. Chambers, Paris T. Carlisle, Eli Saulsbury, Merritt Scotten,
  • USGS Pfe , Science for a Changing World \ \C

    USGS Pfe , Science for a Changing World \ \C

    USGS pfe , science for a changing world \ \c. £ j* y>8 i V° In cooperation with Dover Air Force Base Assessment of Natural Attenuation of Contamination from Three Source Areas in the East Management Unit, Dover Air Force Base, Kent County, Delaware Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4153 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONVERSION FACTORS, VERTICAL DATUM, AND ABBREVIATIONS Multiply By To obtain inch per year (in/yr) 0.02540 meter per year foot (ft) 0.3048 meter foot per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day foot per year (ft/yr) 0.3048 meter per year mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer Sea Level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929. Abbreviated water-quality units used in this report: Chemical concentration for water is given in milligrams per liter (mg/L), or micrograms per liter (jig/L). U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Natural Attenuation of Contamination from Three Source Areas in the East Management Unit, Dover Air Force Base, Kent County, Delaware by L Joseph Bachman, Martha L Cashel, and Barbara A. Bekins Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4153 In cooperation with Dover Air Force Base Baltimore, Maryland 1998 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director The use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • W 4 2005 Constance Holland, AICP Delaware State Office of Planning

    W 4 2005 Constance Holland, AICP Delaware State Office of Planning

    rn @ rn n w January 3, 2005 ~~ . ARCHITECTURE DEC 4 2005 ENGINEERING Constance Holland, AICP Delaware State Office of Planning Coordination OFC. OF STATE PlANNING COORD \NNING OUR 540 S. Dupont Highway, Suite 7 'N1S' SUCCESS Dover, DE 19901 RE: Preliminary Land Use Service FIELDSTONE DEVELOPMENT Woodside, Delaware 2004100.00 Dear Miss. Holland: The Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination reviewed the Fieldstone project through their Preliminary Land Use Service (PLUS) process on July 28, 2004. The following are the PLUS comments received by the various state agencies, with our response in italics: Office of State Plannin!! Coordination This project is located in Investment Level I according to the June 3 version of the 2004 State Strategies for Policies and Spending, which has been approved by the Cabinet Committee for State Planning Issues. This site is also located in the Kent County Growth Zone. Investment Level 1 reflects areasthat are already developed in an urban or suburban fashion, where infrastructure is existing or readily available, and where future redevelopment or infill projects are expected and encouraged by state policy. This project is a mixed-use project providing commercial, office, and residential uses. Our office supports mixed use infill and redevelopment projects as essential to the Livable Delaware strategy of concentrating growth in and around existing communities and infrastructure. This is the type of project that is highly desirable to allow us to meet our goals of revitalizing our already urbanized areas while protecting agricultural lands and natural resource areas from encroachment by sprawling suburban and rural development. The Office of State Planning Coordination has no objections to the proposed rezoning and development of this project in accordance with the relevant 38 SOurH GovERNORS AVE county codes and ordinances.