DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment Environmental United States Department of Assessment Agriculture Forest Service North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project February 2007 Salida Ranger District, San Isabel National Forest Chaffee County, Colorado For Information Contact: William Schuckert, District Ranger 325 West Rainbow Blvd. Salida, CO 81201 (719) 539-3591 North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment USDA Forest Service Pike and San Isabel National Forest Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands Salida Ranger District Chaffee County, Colorado Those wishing to comment on the project should provide the following information: name, address, phone number (if possible), title of the document being commented upon, and specific facts or comments along with supporting reasons that should be considered in reaching a decision. Comments should be mailed to NORTH TROUT CREEK EA, Salida Ranger District, 325 West Rainbow Blvd., Salida, CO 81201 before March 16, 2007. You may contact Mr. Sam Schroeder at (719) 539-3591 for more information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment This page intentionally left blank. North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................VI 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION...................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action, Existing Condition, & Future Desired Condition ........................................................................................................1 1.2.1 Existing Condition ............................................................................1 1.2.2 Need for Action.................................................................................3 1.2.3 Purpose of the Project.....................................................................3 1.2.4 Future Desire Condition (0 – 10 Years Post Treatment) ...........4 1.3 Forest Plan Direction ....................................................................................6 1.3.1 Forest Plan Goals (related to this project)....................................7 1.3.2 Management Areas .........................................................................8 1.4 Key Issues...................................................................................................10 1.5 Decision Framework...................................................................................12 1.6 Public Involvement......................................................................................12 2.0 ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION......................... 14 2.1 Alternatives ..................................................................................................14 2.1.1 Alternative 1: No Action ...............................................................17 2.1.2 Alternative 2: Proposed Action.....................................................17 2.1.3 Alternative 3 ....................................................................................22 2.2 Comparison of Alternatives .......................................................................23 2.3 Alternatives considered but eliminated from detailed study ................23 2.4 Mitigation measures...................................................................................24 2.4.1 Soils..................................................................................................24 2.4.2 Hydrology ........................................................................................25 2.4.3 Cultural and Heritage Resources ................................................25 2.5 Monitoring plan...........................................................................................25 2.5.1 Current Monitoring .........................................................................25 2.5.2 Implementation Monitoring ...........................................................26 2.5.3 Effectiveness Monitoring...............................................................27 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .... 28 3.1 Forest Health, Vegetation and fire............................................................28 3.1.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................28 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................29 3.2 Air quality......................................................................................................31 3.2.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................31 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................32 3.3 Noxious weeds ............................................................................................33 i North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment 3.3.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................33 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................33 3.4 Range............................................................................................................34 3.4.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................34 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................37 3.5 Botany...........................................................................................................38 3.5.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................38 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................43 3.6 Wildlife & Fisheries .....................................................................................47 3.6.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................47 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................51 3.7 Soils...............................................................................................................71 3.7.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................71 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................73 3.8 Hydrology .....................................................................................................77 3.8.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................77 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................79 3.9 Cultural and Heritage Resources .............................................................85 3.9.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................85 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................87 3.10 Recreation Resources................................................................................88 3.10.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................88 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives ....................89 3.11 Economic Analysis......................................................................................90 4.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION.................................................... 91 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................... 92 GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................. 99 ii North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment APPENDIX Appendix A Temporary Roads Information Appendix B Treatment by Polygon for the Proposed Action Appendix C Treatment by Polygon for Alternative 3 i North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment MAPS Map 1.0 Vicinity Map Map 1.1 Existing Condition – Area Locations Map 1.2 Management Areas Map 2.1 Alternative 1: No Action. Map 2.2 Alternative 2: Proposed Action. Map 2.3 Alternative 2: Proposed Action with Proposed Roads Map 2.4 Alternative 3 Map 2.5 Alternative 3 with Proposed Roads ii North Trout Creek Forest Health and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Environmental Assessment TABLES Table 1.1 Vegetation Types with Approximate Acres in the Project Area Table 2.1 Comparison of Action Alternatives by Acres Table 2.2 Comparison of Roads Needed for Each Action Alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spanish Peaks Wilderness
    Mt. Bierstadt Field Trip Trip date: 6/17/2006 Ralph Swain, USFS R2 Wilderness Program Manager Observations: 1). The parking lot was nearly full (approximately 35 + vehicles) at 8:00 am on a Saturday morning. I observed better-than-average compliance with the dog on leash regulation. Perhaps this was due to my Forest Service truck being at the entrance to the parking lot and the two green Forest Service trucks (Dan and Tom) in the lot! 2). District Ranger Dan Lovato informed us of the District’s intent to only allow 40 vehicles in the lower parking lot. Additional vehicles will have to drive to the upper parking lot. This was new information for me and I’m currently checking in with Steve Priest of the South Platte Ranger District to learn more about the parking situation at Mt. Bierstadt. 3). I observed users of all types and abilities hiking the 14er. Some runners, 14 parties with dogs (of which 10 were in compliance with the dog-leash regulation), and a new- born baby being carried to the top by mom and dad (that’s a first for me)! Management Issues: 1). Capacity issue: I counted 107 people on the hike, including our group of 14 people. The main issue for Mt. Bierstadt, being a 14er hike in a congressionally designated wilderness, is a social issue of how many people are appropriate? Thinking back to Dr. Cordell’s opening Forum discuss on demographic trends and the growth coming to the west, including front-range Denver, the use on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Park County, Colorado, Historic Cemeteries B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Historic Cemetery Development in Park County, Colorado, 1859-1965 C. Form Prepared by name/title R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons organization Front Range Research Associates, Inc. date October 2016 street & number 3635 W. 46th Ave. email [email protected] telephone 303-477-7597 city or town Denver state Colorado zip code 80211 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Colorado Backpacking Loops
    Classic Colorado Backpacking Loops Colorado is a mecca for backpacking with the most fourteeners of any state, multiple national parks to trek across, and a vast trail system interwoven through the Colorado Rocky Mountains. While out and back trips can be rewarding, backpacking loops give hikers a chance to continually explore new territory. These four classic Colorado backpacking trips are the perfect weekend getaways that can be done in 2-4 days. 1. Elk Creek to Needleton Loop This is an iconic 36-mile trip in the Weminuche Wilderness in Western Colorado that starts & ends with an epic train ride. You start by boarding the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad and enjoy the scenery as it meanders through the San Juan National Forest. After about 1 to 3 hours depending if you start in Durango or Silverton, the train will come to a stop in the vast wilderness where you will hop off, grab your pack, and then wave to the train as it chugs away leaving you surrounded by mountain peaks. The first day of hiking is mostly uphill following Elk Creek through the wooded forest. On day two you will push past tree-line to reach the Continental Divide with unobstructed views of the surrounding peaks. Lightening and storms are frequent in this area, so don’t stay too long at the top. The next several miles of hiking will be a lot of ups & downs as you traverse the backside of the mountains as you gear up to reach Vallecito Creek Bridge which has ample campsites and has good fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • July 15Th – Pikes Peak Group Program
    July 2014 | No. 203 July 15th – Pikes Peak Group Program Jes Meiris Presents: Big wall speed climbing on El Capitan Please join us in welcoming Jes Meiris to the monthly program Her passions include climbing big walls in alpine style, of the CMC’s Pikes Peak Group at 7:30 p.m. on July 15th in the mountain biking, hiking, playing piano, and snow sports. All Souls Unitarian Church, 730 N. Tejon St. Personal climbing adventures have yielded ascents in Squamish BC, Yosemite CA, Red Rocks NV, Smith Rocks OR, the Cascades, and Colorado's Rocky Mountains to name a few. With climbing partner Quinn Brett, she held the women's speed record on the Nose of El Capitan (10 hours, 19 minutes, on June 10, 2012), and just a couple of days ago reclaimed the record. Come hear about the history, the training for climbing almost four thousand vertical feet, the mental challenges, and bringing all the elements together for a successful climb. Jes is a Colorado native whose passion for the outdoors was kindled at a very young age. After living on both coasts and a few places in between, she made her home in Colorado Springs during the winter months. She coaches a competitive climbing team for Fountain Valley School, leads both indoor and outdoor technical skills clinics, and works as a At the monthly presentation Jes will discuss valuable lessons professional model. During the summer she travels regionally, she has learned through climbing and guiding, including her guiding rock climbing and mountain biking trips. In addition, speed ascent of the Nose on El Capitan.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Listing
    Trail Listing Trail Listing South Park Ranger District 320 US Highway 285, PO Box 219, Fairplay, CO 80440 719-836-2031 Website: www.fs.fed.us/r2/psicc/sopa Trail Name and Number Distance Difficulty Use USGS Maps Elevation Access Observ. Rock Moderate- Hiking 1. 1. Hwy 285 near Shawnee Ben Tyler #606 11.4 Mi. Mt. Logan 9,500-13,000 Difficult Horse Riding 2. 2. Lost Park Rd (CR 56) at Rock Creek TH Shawnee McCurdy Mtn 1. Twin Eagles TH off Tarryall Rd Moderate- Hiking Farnum Peak 2. Lost Park CG off Lost Park Rd (CR 56) Brookside-McCurdy #607 32.6 Mi. 8,500-11,880 Difficult Horse Riding Topaz Mtn via Wigwam Trail Shawnee 3. CR 64 W of Bailey 1. CR 56 to FSR 817 to Long Gulch TH Colorado Trail #1776 Hiking Topaz Mtn 7.8 Mi. Moderate 10,000-11,000 2. CR 56 to FSR 134 to North Fork TH Segment 4 Horse Riding Windy Peak 3. CR 56 to Brookside-McCurdy TH Topaz Mtn 1. At the top of Kenosha Pass Colorado Trail #1776 Hiking Observ. Rock 14 Mi. Moderate 9,000-11,000 2. CR 56 to FSR 133 to Rock Creek TH Segment 5 Horse Riding Mt. Logan 3. CR 56 to FSR 817 to Long Gulch TH Jefferson Hiking 1. At the top of Kenosha Pass Colorado Trail #1776 Jefferson 11 Mi. Moderate Horse Riding 9,900-11,600 2. Jefferson Lake Recreation Area at Beaver Segment 6 Boreas Pass Mtn Biking Ponds Picnic Ground 5.9 Mi.- Trail-Easy Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 631 One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three An Act To designate certain lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS. (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993''. (b) DEFINITIONS.Ð(1) As used in this Act with reference to lands in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of Agriculture. (2) As used in this Act with respect to lands not in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM. (a) ADDITIONS.ÐThe following lands in the State of Colorado are hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) Certain lands in the Gunnison Resource Area adminis- tered by the Bureau of Land Management which comprise approximately 3,390 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ``American Flats Additions to the Big Blue Wilderness Proposal (American Flats)'', dated January, 1993, and which are hereby incorporated in and shall be deemed to be a part of the wilderness area designated by section 102(a)(1) of Public Law 96±560 and renamed Uncompahgre Wilderness by section 3(f) of this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado Trail Foundation Fall Newsletter 1999
    The Colorado Trail Foundation Fall Newsletter 1999 An Event to Be Remembered! President’s by Gudy Gaskill Corner The 25th Anniversary Celebration at Mount Vernon Country Club was a gala event, packed with old acquaintances in their by George Miller best bib and tucker, with happy faces and great anticipation for seeing items on display that have never before been viewed by Summer Trail Crews the public, for learning unknown facts about the CT, and for revisiting the historic years that saw The Colorado Trail to its With signs of fall in the air and fruition. There were new videos, a host of panel displays, walls the changing of the aspens, we covered with honors and awards, and photo displays of times, can look back with appreciation crews, and famous faces. The whole Colorado Trail was shown on the accomplishments of the on a colorful series of maps, with a paneled and descriptive summer trail season. We had a legend. The CT was even traced on a relief map, winding its total of 13 crews in the field way over mountain passes and along valley floors. It was truly a doing maintenance and rerout- historic display. Neither these displays nor the anniversary ing. One of our important celebration could have been possible without the help of a great accomplishments was to elimi- many enthusiastic and talented volunteers. Kudos to the follow- nate walking on about six miles Continued on page 3 of four-wheel-drive road in the area between Spring Creek Pass and Carson Saddle. The other projects along the trail continue to improve and keep our trail the premier long-distance hike in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • *JUNE 2014 in Process
    Rocky Mountain Over The Hill Gang Hill Topics June 2014 PLEASE VERIFY YOUR CHANGE IS EMAIL ADDRESS! GONNA COME It is important that your email address at Log onto www.cmc.org. Click on CMC is correct. All of our correspondence Members tab near the top right of the As of this issue, comes to you through email, including our screen. Then click on My Membership. RMOTHG newsletter and information on hiking, Next, click on My Member Info. You can has begun using the CMC biking, snowshoeing, skiing and social verify all of your information. Under newsletter delivery events. We also send letters to welcome Personal Information, be sure your system. To access the new members to the RMOTHG, as well as correct email address is entered. It is newsletter, simply click on notify you if your membership is about to helpful if your phone number is entered so the link in each month’s expire. Without a correct email, it is we can call you if any problems. Be sure Preview, or go to http:// difficult to communicate with you. to go towards the bottom of the screen www.cmc.org/RMOTHG Please check your email by logging onto and select the green Update Information the CMC website. I know you are button so that any changes will be thinking, “My email is correct!” It is captured. If you want to change your Newsletters will be surprising how many rejects we get on password you will need to contact CMC archived both at: email addresses every month. Please, Member Services, 303-279-3080, x2.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region 2 – Historical Geography, Names, Boundaries
    NAMES, BOUNDARIES, AND MAPS: A RESOURCE FOR THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (Region Two) By Peter L. Stark Brief excerpts of copyright material found herein may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, education, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C § 107 of the United States copyright law. Copyright holder does ask that you reference the title of the essay and my name as the author in the event others may need to reach me for clarifi- cation, with questions, or to use more extensive portions of my reference work. Also, please contact me if you find any errors or have a map that has not been included in the cartobibliography ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of compiling this work, I have met many dedicated cartographers, Forest Service staff, academic and public librarians, archivists, and entrepreneurs. I first would like to acknowledge the gracious assistance of Bob Malcolm Super- visory Cartographer of Region 2 in Golden, Colorado who opened up the Region’s archive of maps and atlases to me in November of 2005. Also, I am indebted to long-time map librarians Christopher Thiry, Janet Collins, Donna Koepp, and Stanley Stevens for their early encouragement and consistent support of this project. In the fall of 2013, I was awarded a fellowship by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation and the Grey Towers National Historic Site. The Scholar in Resi- dence program of the Grey Towers Heritage Association allowed me time to write and edit my research on the mapping of the National Forest System in an office in Gifford Pinchot’s ancestral home.
    [Show full text]