Projects Implemented by CDD with the Georgian Orthodox Church 2014 – 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amendment 1 to Annex 1 Job Descriptions Cfc 2-2016
EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE Annex 1 European Union CSDP Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) 2-2016 Call for Contributions Organisation: EUMM Georgia Job Location: As indicated below Employment As indicated below Regime: Ref.: Name of the Post: Location: Availability: Seconded (47) GEO HO 19 Planning and Evaluation Officer Tbilisi 02 Sep 2016 GEO AR 11 * Press and Public Information Officer Tbilisi 01 Nov 2016 GEO AR 13 Political Adviser Tbilisi ASAP GEO OP 01 Head of Operations Tbilisi ASAP GEO OP 02 * Deputy Head of Operations Tbilisi 19 Sep 2016 GEO OC 03a * Operational Planning and Conduct Officer Tbilisi 13 Sep 2016 GEO OE 02b Capacity Enhancement Coordinator Tbilisi ASAP GEO OL 01 Liaison Officer to SSSG and MIA Tbilisi 16 Sep 2016 GEO ZO 02 Deputy Field Office Chief Zugdidi 21 Sep 2016 GEO ZO 03 Operations Officer Zugdidi 18 Sep 2016 Job Titles/ GEO ZO 08 Reporting and Information Officer Zugdidi ASAP Vacancy GEO ZM 12 Monitor Zugdidi 30 Sep 2016 Notice: GEO ZM 13 Monitor Zugdidi 16 Dec 2016 GEO ZM 14 Monitor Zugdidi 11 Oct 2016 GEO ZM 23 Monitor Zugdidi 01 Nov 2016 GEO ZM 24 Monitor Zugdidi 02 Sep 2016 GEO ZM 26 Monitor Zugdidi 29 Dec 2016 GEO ZM 28 Monitor Zugdidi 02 Dec 2016 GEO ZM 29 Monitor Zugdidi 30 Sep 2016 GEO ZM 31 Monitor Zugdidi ASAP GEO ZM 36 Monitor Zugdidi 01 Oct 2016 GEO ZM 37 Monitor Zugdidi 11 Oct 2016 GEO ZM 38 Monitor Zugdidi 18 Sep 2016 GEO GO 01 Field Office Chief Gori 07 Dec 2016 GEO GO 02 Deputy Field Office Chief Gori ASAP 1/32 GEO GO 04 Operations Officer Gori 26 Sep 2016 GEO GO 09 Reporting and Information -
Economic Prosperity Initiative
USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli -
Tour from Kutaisi Cultural & Sightseeing Tours
Samegrelo private tour from Kutaisi Cultural & Sightseeing Tours Overview Day Trip to Martvili Canyon, Zugdidi, ethno-village Sisa Tura and Nokalakevi from Kutaisi Starts from: Kutaisi Available: All Year Driving distance: 250 km Type: Private Full day trip Duration: 10 hours The private guided day trip to Samegrelo from Kutaisi offers visiting one of the oldest kingdoms of Georgia and its former capital town Zugdidi. During the day, visit four main sites: a natural wonder of Martvili Canyon , Ethno-Village Sisa Tura, Dadiani Palace and Nokalakevi acropolis & archaeological site. Lunch will be served in a traditional Colchian Oda House. Have a fantastic day ahead! Tour details Code: KUT-PT-S01 Starts from: Kutaisi Max. Group Size: 15 Adults Duration: Full Day Prices Group size Price per adult Solo 181 € 2-3 people 103 € 4-5 people 63 € 6-7 people 56 € 8-9 people 47 € 10-15 people 43 € *Online booking deposit: 15 € 1 person from the group will be FREE of charge if 10 and more adults are traveling together Child Policy 0-1 years - Free 2-6 years - 22 € 7 years and over - Adult * Online booking deposit will be deducted from the total tour price. The balance can be paid in one of the following ways: Bank transfer - Euro/USD/GBP, any time, but not later than two weeks before the tour starts; VISA/Master card - GEL only (local currency), via POS terminal, directly with your guide at the beginning of the tour. Card service fee + 3%. Cash - GEL only, directly to the nearest TBC Bank office or TBC Bank Cash terminal no later than begging of the tour. -
Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”
Cultural -Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi” (The results of the rapid assessment conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in its target regions) Ekaterine Gamakharia Fund “Sukhumi” 5/1/2020 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Methodology and Demographics ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Negative Impact of Covid-19 on the People’s Lives .......................................................................... 4 2.2. Covid-19 Impact on Gender Roles – Unequal Distribution of the Household Responsibilities ........ 5 2.3. Covid-19 Impact on Economic Security............................................................................................. 6 2.4. Covid-19 Impact on the Possibility to Receive Education ................................................................. 8 2.5. Covid-19 Impact on the Physical Safety of Women – Increased Domestic Violence ....................... 9 2.6. Covid-19 Impact on Food Security .................................................................................................. 11 2.7. Covid-19 Impact on Health Security ................................................................................................ 12 2.8. Covid-19 Impact on -
Analyzing the Russian Way of War Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia
Analyzing the Russian Way of War Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia Lionel Beehner A Contemporary Battlefield Assessment Liam Collins by the Modern War Institute Steve Ferenzi Robert Person Aaron Brantly March 20, 2018 Analyzing the Russian Way of War: Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter I – History of Bad Blood ................................................................................................................ 13 Rose-Colored Glasses .............................................................................................................................. 16 Chapter II – Russian Grand Strategy in Context of the 2008 Russia-Georgia War ................................... 21 Russia’s Ends ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Russia’s Means ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Russia’s Ways ......................................................................................................................................... -
ICC-01/15 13 October 2015 Original
ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 1/160 EO PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/15 Date: 13 October 2015 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Joyce Aluoch, Presiding Judge Judge Cuno Tarfusser Judge Péter Kovács SITUATION IN GEORGIA Public Document with Confidential, EX PARTE, Annexes A,B, C, D.2, E.3, E.7, E.9, F H and Public Annexes 1, D.1, E.1, E.2, E.4, E.5, E.6, E.8,G ,I, J Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-01/15 1/160 13 October 2015 ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 2/160 EO PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Mrs Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Defence Support Section Mr Herman von Hebel Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section No. ICC-01/15 2/160 13 October 2015 ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 3/160 EO PT Table of Contents with Confidential, EX PARTE, Annexes C, D,E.3, E.7,E.9 H and Public Annexes, A, B,D, E.1, E.2, E.4, E.5, E.6, E.8, F,G,I,J................................................................................................1 Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 ....................................1 I. -
Evaluation of Performance of the Municipal Council of Zugdidi Contents
Evaluation of Performance of the Municipal Council of Zugdidi Contents Introduction: ________________________________________________________ 3 Chapter 1: Main Findings ____________________________________________ 3 Chapter 2: General Information about the Municipal Council of Zugdidi __ 4 Chapter 3: Important Developments ________________________________ 8 Chapter 4: Activities of Commissions and Factions of the Municipal Council __ 9 Chapter 5: Control of Bodies Accountable to the Municipal Council __ 12 Chapter 6: Activities of ad hoc Task Forces __________________________ 13 Chapter 7: Incomplete Asset Declarations and Incompatible Activity __ 14 Chapter 8: Involvement of Members of the Municipal Council in the Council’s Activities __________________________________________________ 16 Chapter 9: Citizens’ Involvement in the Municipal Council’s Activities ___ 17 Chapter 10: Activities of the Gender Equality Council _________________ 18 Chapter 11: Expenditures of the Municipal Council of Zugdidi ________ 18 Recommendations __________________________________________________ 23 Introduction: Transparency International Georgia (TI Georgia) is presenting its evaluation of the performance of the representative body of the Zugdidi Municipality – the Municipal Council elected in 2017. The report is based on information requested and received from the Municipal Council and that posted on the Council’s official website, as well as on observations of our organization. The reporting period of the study is from November 2017 up to 2019. Chapter 1: Main Findings ● During the reporting period, the Municipal Council of Zugdidi exercised weak supervision on the Zugdidi City Hall and legal entities established by it, and the control over the officials and individual agencies accountable to the Municipal Council was formal in most cases. ● During the reporting period, the Municipal Council of Zugdidi held 65 sessions, more than half (40) of which were extraordinary sessions. -
MUNICIPAL WATER and WASTEWATER SECTOR in GEORGIA Status Report
MUNICIPAL WATER AND WASTEWATER SECTOR IN GEORGIA Status Report By David Melua 2015 Municipal Water and Wastewater Sector in Georgia, status Report Table of Content Current situation page 3 Institutional Setting page 6 Legal framework page 16 Key findings and conclusions page 21 Abbreviations GWP – Georgian Water and Power GEL – Georgian Lari GUWSC – Georgian United Water Supply Company USAID – US agency for international Development EIB – European Investment Bank ADB – Asian Development Bank A.R. - Autonomous Republic KfW - Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau MDF – Municipal Development Fund WED – Water Framework Directive AA – association Agreement 2 Municipal Water and Wastewater Sector in Georgia, status Report 1. Current Situation About 95% of the urban and 35% of the rural population is supplied by centralised water service. This indicates high network coverage by international standards. The actual performance of this system is a problem, however. Poor quality of the distribution network results in a water loss rate of 10-51%, and 40% water loss in Tbilisi. All urban households suffer interrupted supply, receiving water much less than 24 hours a day, in some cities as little as 8-10 hours a day. In rural areas the supply system often does not function at all. This affects mainly people living on higher floors of buildings, because of low pressure in the sys- tem. The major reason for that is the shortage of electricity supply due to a lack of payment and also physical shortages. The majority of the connected urban households can have potentially good water quality, as the main source is groundwater. Groundwater sources provide about 90% of the water supply apart from Tbilisi. -
Enhancing Capacity for Low Emission Development Strategies Beling by DISPLAY
DISPLAY TRAINING In July, Green Building Council Georgia conducted training on Building Energy La- Quarterly Newsletter Enhancing Capacity For Low Emission Development Strategies beling by DISPLAY. The training included how to use the online tool designed and maintained by Energy Cities. Originally it was intended for use by municipalities – EC-LEDS Covenant of Mayors’ signatories--but now it has become a management instrument for other interested parties as well, including NGOs, ministries, and the private sec- Summer 2015 Clean Energy Program tor. Currently DISPLAY is used by more than 400 municipalities in 27 countries. It contributes to the implementation of European Building Performance Directives that will become mandatory for Georgia after Georgian legislation is harmonized with AMERICA DAYS 2015 European law, as per a recently signed Association Agreement. In addition to the EU directive, DISPLAY includes water efficiency and other recommendations that are From June 1 to 6 the U.S. Embassy celebrated not required, and was chosen by the EC-LEDS program from among other systems America Days to showcase American culture and of building labeling because of its wide coverage and its ease of use. It is accessible U.S.-supported programs in four Georgian cities - from any work station and has been adapted to Georgian climate data and lan- guage. - Zugdidi, Akhaltsikhe, Gori and Tbilisi. Organizing an Information Fair, the Embassy In August, GBC-Ge conducted a series of information meetings on DISPLAY for cities that are signatories to Covenant of Mayors and for those who are preparing Sus- showed visitors about assistance programs, edu- tainable Energy Action Plans (SEAP). -
Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. -
Grape and Wine Culture in Georgia, the South Caucasus
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 03027 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160703027 39th World Congress of Vine and Wine Grape and wine culture in Georgia, the South Caucasus David Maghradze1,a, Giorgi Samanishvili1, Levan Mekhuzla1, Irma Mdinaradze1, George Tevzadze1, Andro Aslanishvili1, Paata Chavchanidze1, David Lordkipanidze2, Mindia Jalabadze2, Eliso Kvavadze2, Nana Rusishvili2, Eldar Nadiradze2, Gvantsa Archvadze2, Patrick McGovern3, Patrice This4, Roberto Bacilieri4, Osvaldo Failla5, Gabriele Cola5, Luigi Mariani5, Nathan Wales6, M. Thomas P. Gilbert6, Laurent Bouby7, Tina Kazeli8, Levan Ujmajuridze9, Stephen Batiuk10, Andrew Graham10, Lika Megrelidze11, Tamar Bagratia11, and Levan Davitashvili12 1 National Wine Agency of Georgia, 6 Marshal Geloveni Ave., 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia 2 National Museum of Georgia, 3 Purtseladze Str., 0105 Tbilisi, Georgia 3 University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 3260 South St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 4 INRA-CIRAD-SupAgro, UMR AGAP, 1334 Montpellier, France 5 University of Milan, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 6 University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5–7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark 7 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, University of Montpellier, Place Eugene` Bataillon, 22, 34095 Montpellier, France 8 Georgian Wine Association, 12 Mtatsminda Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia 9 Scientific – Research Center of Agriculture, 6 Marshal Geloveni Ave., 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia 10 University of Toronto, Dept. of Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations, 4 Bancroft Ave, Toronto, Canada 11 Environmental Agency of Georgia, David Aghmashenebely Ave., 0112 Tbilisi, Georgia 12 Minister of Agriculture of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia Abstract. In 2014, the National Wine Agency of the Republic of Georgia initiated a three-year “Research Project for the study of Georgian Grapes and Wine Culture. -
Decarbonisation Scenarios for the Transport Sector in Georgia
Decarbonisation scenarios for the transport sector in Georgia Authors: Thomas Day, Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, Swithin Lui January 2021 Decarbonisation scenarios for the transport sector in Georgia Project number 216065 © NewClimate Institute 2021 Authors Thomas Day, Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, Swithin Lui Acknowledgements We are grateful for the contributions of Ketevan Vardosanidze, Mariam Kvaratskhelia, Ilka Starrost and Oscar Zarzo Fuertes (GIZ) for extensive research support and stakeholder engagement; Martina Kolb (GIZ) and the Mobility4Cities team for review; Anna Sikharulidze (Remissia) for LEAP modelling and review; Lasha Nakashidze (UNDP); Giorgi Mukhigulishvili (WEG), and Nino Janashia (Freie Universität Berlin) for insights and discussion; all transport sector working group participants taking place in Tbilisi in 2018 and 2019, municipality city halls of Tbilisi and Batumi, and Giorgi Gigauri for data consultations and validation; Gvantsa Gverdtsiteli (Roskilde University) and Aleksandra Savitckaia (South Pole) for research support; and Victoria Fischdick (NewClimate Institute) for communications and design support. Disclaimer This report was prepared in the frame of the cooperation between the regional GIZ project “Capacity Development for Climate Policy in the Countries of South-Eastern, Eastern Europe, South Caucasus and Central Asia, Phase III (CDCPIII)”, commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety as part of the International Climate Initiative. The analysis, results and recommendations expressed in this report represent the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the funder nor of the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ GmbH). The analysis and data presented in this report represent the latest information and insights available as of 2019 and does not incorporate developments after this period.