Viking and Norse Settlers and Their Lasting Impact on Iceland and Its People

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viking and Norse Settlers and Their Lasting Impact on Iceland and Its People Viking and Norse Settlers and Their Lasting Impact on Iceland and Its People Abstract Nikolas J. Blanks Findings The purpose of this research was to The Environment investigate the lasting impacts that the Norse and Viking Freshman, B.S. Spaceflight Operations • The rapid colonization of Iceland by settlers had on Iceland’s environment and people. Through an [email protected] Viking settlers. extensive preliminary literature review and research process, • Early settlers stripped Iceland of almost I learned that Viking settlers colonized Iceland quickly in all natural birch forests for wood their hunt for resources. The settlers ravaged the land of its resources and farming/grazing fields. natural birch forests, using the wood for various necessities. Methodology • Imported livestock put pressure on the This rapid deforestation contributed to current issues Iceland soil and growth of flora. has had with soil erosion and lack of forest growth (Luft, Using the method of Triangulation, • Without forests, soil became loose and 2001). three different methods of gathering information were susceptible to erosion. While in Iceland, I kept a field journal to used to answer the research question: • Icelandic soil partly consists of volcanic record my observations and notes, as well as conduct an • An Interview with Iceland Tour Guide ash which is prone to erosion interview on the various ways Vikings have left their mark on • Personal Observations Culture Iceland. I attended the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland • Previously Collected Facts & Data • Icelanders are very proud of their Viking to learn more about what Iceland is doing to reverse the ancestry. effects of soil erosion and to gather more information about • DNA of Icelanders is split 50/50 between the Vikings’ role in the changing environment. I found that Photo 1 - Right Norse (Viking) and Irish. the Viking settlers’ deforestation of Iceland was the tipping One of the few • Many Viking references in everyday point for the environment. Without the birch forests and other patches of birch forest culture. plants, the soil became loose and vulnerable to the strong I witnessed in our • Still base justice system on Viking ideals. winds of Iceland (Catlin, 2016). Despite the Vikings’ role in drive through Iceland. • Icelandic language is practically identical the environment, I observed that Icelanders are very proud of to the language spoken by the Vikings. their heritage. Conclusion Iceland and its people still bare the scars and marks that the ancient Photo 2 - Left Viking Settlers left. Modern Icelanders are The typical flora in Iceland usually consists of grass and struggling to conserve their nutrient rich soil low bushes. from erosion and regrow their birch forests. Even though these amazing people are still dealing with the impacts of their ancestors’ choices, one can see that they embrace their References Viking heritage fully. While on the surface • Interview with Baldur Gylfason there are plenty of references to the Vikings • Soil Conservation Service of Iceland (SCSI) throughout their culture, the connection goes • Luft, E. (2001). The Discovery and Settlement of Iceland. deeper than what meets the eye. Retrieved January 29, 2018 from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/ps/i.d o?p=GVRL&u=embry&id=GALE|CX3408500474&v=2.1 &it=r&sid=summon&authCount=1 Photo 4 • Catlin, K. (2016, September). Archaeology for the This ship, named the Anthropocene: Scale, soil, and the settlement of Iceland. Icelander, is accurate to Photo 3 Retrieved January 29, 2018 from https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/science/article/pii/S22133 Viking age long boat on Viking legend Leif Erikson proudly immortalized in front 0541530028X?via%3Dihub display at Viking World. of the famous Hallgrimskirkja in Reykjavik, Iceland..
Recommended publications
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo
    CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo-European and Germanic Background Indo-European Background It has already been mentioned in this course that German and English are related languages. Two languages can be related to each other in much the same way that two people can be related to each other. If two people share a common ancestor, say their mother or their great-grandfather, then they are genetically related. Similarly, German and English are genetically related because they share a common ancestor, a language which was spoken in what is now northern Germany sometime before the Angles and the Saxons migrated to England. We do not have written records of this language, unfortunately, but we have a good idea of what it must have looked and sounded like. We have arrived at our conclusions as to what it looked and sounded like by comparing the sounds of words and morphemes in earlier written stages of English and German (and Dutch) and in modern-day English and German dialects. As a result of the comparisons we are able to reconstruct what the original language, called a proto-language, must have been like. This particular proto-language is usually referred to as Proto-West Germanic. The method of reconstruction based on comparison is called the comparative method. If faced with two languages the comparative method can tell us one of three things: 1) the two languages are related in that both are descended from a common ancestor, e.g. German and English, 2) the two are related in that one is the ancestor of the other, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Religious Practice in Norse Greenland
    Hugvísindasvið Early Religious Practice in Norse Greenland: th From the Period of Settlement to the 12 Century Ritgerð til M.A.-prófs Andrew Umbrich September 2012 U m b r i c h | 2 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Medieval Icelandic Studies Early Religious Practice in Norse Greenland: th From the Period of Settlement to the 12 Century Ritgerð til M.A.-prófs Andrew Umbrich Kt.: 130388-4269 Leiðbeinandi: Gísli Sigurðsson September 2012 U m b r i c h | 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Scholarly Works and Sources Used in This Study ...................................................... 8 1.2 Inherent Problems with This Study: Written Sources and Archaeology .................... 9 1.3 Origin of Greenland Settlers and Greenlandic Law .................................................. 10 2.0 Historiography ................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Lesley Abrams’ Early Religious Practice in the Greenland Settlement.................... 12 2.2 Jonathan Grove’s The Place of Greenland in Medieval Icelandic Saga Narratives.. 14 2.3 Gísli Sigurðsson’s Greenland in the Sagas of Icelanders: What Did the Writers Know - And How Did They Know It? and The Medieval Icelandic Saga and Oral Tradition: A Discourse on Method....................................................................................... 15 2.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social-Ecological Resilience in the Viking-Age to Early-Medieval Faroe Islands
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 Social-Ecological Resilience in the Viking-Age to Early-Medieval Faroe Islands Seth Brewington Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/870 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE IN THE VIKING-AGE TO EARLY-MEDIEVAL FAROE ISLANDS by SETH D. BREWINGTON A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 © 2015 SETH D. BREWINGTON All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _Thomas H. McGovern__________________________________ ____________________ _____________________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee _Gerald Creed_________________________________________ ____________________ _____________________________________________________ Date Executive Officer _Andrew J. Dugmore____________________________________ _Sophia Perdikaris______________________________________ _George Hambrecht_____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The First Settlers of Iceland: an Isotopic Approach to Colonisation
    The first settlers of Iceland: an isotopic approach to colonisation T. Douglas Price1 & Hildur Gestsdottir´ 2 The colonisation of the North Atlantic from the eighth century AD was the earliest expansion of European populations to the west. Norse and Celtic voyagers are recorded as reaching and settling in Iceland, Greenland and easternmost North America between c. AD 750 and 1000, but the date of these events and the homeland of the colonists are subjects of some debate. In this project, the birthplaces of 90 early burials from Iceland were sought using strontium isotope analysis. At least nine, and probably thirteen, of these individuals can be distinguished as migrants to Iceland from other places. In addition, there are clear differences to be seen in the diets of the local Icelandic peoples, ranging from largely terrestrial to largely marine consumption. Keywords: Iceland, colonisation, settlement, isotopes, strontium, human migration, enamel Introduction An extraordinary series of events began in the North Sea and North Atlantic region around the eighth century AD. Norse raiders and settlers from Scandinavia, better known as the Vikings, began expanding to the west, settling in the British Isles and Ireland, including the smaller groups of islands, the Orkneys, Shetlands, Hebrides and the Isle of Man. Stepping across the North Atlantic, Norse colonists reached the Faeroe Islands by around AD 825, Iceland by around AD 875 and Greenland by around AD 895 (Figure 1). Both Iceland and the Faeroe Islands were uninhabited at the time of the Norse colonisation. The Norse also settled briefly in North America at L’Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland, around AD 1000 (Jones 1986; Wallace 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Different Paths Towards Autonomy
    Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Sagnfræði Different paths towards autonomy: A comparison of the political status of the Faroe Islands and th Iceland in the first half of the 19 century Ritgerð til B. A.- prófs Regin Winther Poulsen Kt.: 111094-3579 Leiðbeinandi: Anna Agnarsdóttir Janúar 2018 Abstract This dissertation is a comparison of the political status of Iceland and the Faroe Islands within the Danish kingdom during the first half of the 19th century. Though they share a common history, the two dependencies took a radically different path towards autonomy during this period. Today Iceland is a republic while the Faroes still are a part of the Danish kingdom. This study examines the difference between the agendas of the two Danish dependencies in the Rigsdagen, the first Danish legislature, when it met for the first time in 1848 to discuss the first Danish constitution, the so-called Junigrundloven. In order to explain why the political agendas of the dependencies were so different, it is necessary to study in detail the years before 1848. The administration, trade and culture of the two dependencies are examined in order to provide the background for the discussion of the quite different political status Iceland and the Faroes had within the Danish kingdom. Furthermore, the debates in the Danish state assemblies regarding the re-establishment of the Alþingi in 1843 are discussed in comparison to the debates in the same assemblies regarding the re-establishment of the Løgting in 1844 and 1846. Even though the state assemblies received similar petitions from both dependencies, Alþingi was re-established in 1843, while the same did not happen with the Løgting in the Faroes.
    [Show full text]
  • (In)Visibility and Icelandic Migrants in Norway
    Special Issue Article • DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2014-0026 NJMR • 4(4) • 2014 • 176-183 “WE BLEND IN WITH THE CROWD BUT THEY DON’T” (In)visibility and Icelandic migrants in Norway Abstract Placing emphasis on often overlooked migration within the affluent North, this Guðbjört Guðjónsdóttir* article focuses on Icelanders who have migrated to Norway in the aftermath of the Icelandic financial collapse in October 2008. The article draws on critical Department of Anthropology, University of Iceland whiteness studies and is based on fieldwork and qualitative interviews with 32 Icelandic migrants in Norway. The findings show how the participants construct their belonging through racialization, emphasizing their assumed visual, ancestral and cultural sameness with the majority population. This article, furthermore, reveals how whiteness, language and class intersect – resulting in differing degrees of (in)visibility and privilege among the participants. Despite somewhat different positions, all the participants have the possibility of capitalizing on their Icelandic nationality to receive favourable treatment. The article argues that the preferential treatment of Icelanders and narratives of sameness must be understood in relation to contemporary, intertwined racist and nationalistic discourses that exclude other migrants due to their assumed difference. Keywords Migration • Nordic countries • whiteness • belonging • intersectionality Received 5 February 2014; Accepted 12 September 2014 1 Introduction is on the experiences of Icelanders, socially classified
    [Show full text]
  • Escape from the Great Plains the Icelanders in North Dakota and Alberta
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Fall 1983 Escape From The Great Plains The Icelanders In North Dakota And Alberta Howard Palmer University of Calgary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Palmer, Howard, "Escape From The Great Plains The Icelanders In North Dakota And Alberta" (1983). Great Plains Quarterly. 1695. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1695 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ESCAPE FROM THE GREAT PLAINS THE ICELANDERS IN NORTH DAKOTA AND ALBERTA HOWARD PALMER Immigration historians in Canada and the United One important feature of this movement that States are becoming aware of the need to look they do not highlight is the extent to which at immigration history within the larger context it included European immigrants and their of North American history. Canadian immi­ children who had settled earlier in the United gration patterns have been affected, indirectly, States but decided to move on as new oppor­ almost as much by American immigration pol­ tunities opened up in Canada. The Hrst sizable icy as by Canadian policy. Within many ethnic settlements of Hungarians, Slovaks, Lithuan­ groups in North America, there has been a ians, Czechs, Danes, Finns, Norwegians, Swedes, significant exchange of people and cultural Icelanders, Dutch, Welsh, and Hutterites on patterns between Canada and the United the Canadian prairies did not come directly States.
    [Show full text]
  • Reykjavík Unesco City of Literature
    Reykjavík unesco City of Literature Reykjavík unesco City of Literature Reykjavík unesco City of Literature Reykjavík City of Steering Committee Fridbjörg Ingimarsdóttir Submission writers: Literature submission Svanhildur Konrádsdóttir Director Audur Rán Thorgeirsdóttir, (Committee Chair) Hagthenkir – Kristín Vidarsdóttir Audur Rán Thorgeirsdóttir Director Association of Writers (point person) Reykjavík City of Non-Fiction and Literature Trail: Project Manager Department of Culture Educational Material Reykjavík City Library; Reykjavík City and Tourism Kristín Vidarsdóttir and Department of Culture Esther Ýr Thorvaldsdóttir Úlfhildur Dagsdóttir and Tourism Signý Pálsdóttir Executive Director Tel: (354) 590 1524 Head of Cultural Office Nýhil Publishing Project Coordinator: [email protected] Reykjavík City Svanhildur Konradsdóttir audur.ran.thorgeirsdottir Department of Culture Gudrún Dís Jónatansdóttir @reykjavík.is and Tourism Director Translator: Gerduberg Culture Centre Helga Soffía Einarsdóttir Kristín Vidarsdóttir Anna Torfadóttir (point person) City Librarian Gudrún Nordal Date of submission: Project Manager/Editor Reykjavík City Library Director January 2011 Reykjavík City The Árni Magnússon Institute Department of Culture and Audur Árný Stefánsdóttir for Icelandic Studies Photography: Tourism/Reykjavík City Library Head of Primary and Lower Cover and chapter dividers Tel: (354) 411 6123/ (354) 590 1524 Secondary Schools Halldór Gudmundsson Raphael Pinho [email protected] Reykjavík City Director [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's External Affairs in the Middle Ages: the Shelter of Norwegian Sea
    FRÆÐIGREINAR STJÓRNMÁL & STJÓRNSÝSLA Iceland’s external affairs in the Middle Ages: The shelter of Norwegian sea power Baldur Þórhallsson , Professor of Political Science, University of Iceland Abstract According to the international relations literature, small countries need to form an alliance with larger neighbours in order to defend themselves and be economically sustainable. This paper applies the assumption that small states need economic and political shelter in order to prosper, economically and politically, to the case of Iceland, in an historical context. It analyses whether or not Iceland, as a small entity/country in the Middle Ages (from the Settle ment in the 9 th and 10 th centuries until the late 14 th century) enjoyed political and economic shelter provided by its neighbouring states. Admitting that societies were generally much more self-sufficient in the Middle Ages than in our times, the paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential economic shelter from Norwegian sea power, particularly as regards its role in securing external market access. On the other hand, the transfer of formal political authority from Iceland to the Norwegian crown was the political price paid for this shelter, though the Icelandic domestic elite, at the time, may have regarded it as a political cover. The country’s peripheral location shielded it both from military attacks from outsiders and the king’s day-to-day interference in domestic affairs. That said, the island was not at all unexposed to political and social developments in the British Isles and on the European continent, e.g. as regards the conversion to Christianity and the formation of dynastic and larger states.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Monasticism in Iceland and Norse Greenland
    religions Article Medieval Monasticism in Iceland and Norse Greenland Steinunn Kristjánsdóttir Department of Archaeology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland; [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the monastic houses operated on the northernmost periphery of Roman Catholic Europe during the Middle Ages. The intention is to debunk the long-held theory of Iceland and Norse Greenland’s supposed isolation from the rest of the world, as it is clear that medieval monasticism reached both of these societies, just as it reached their counterparts elsewhere in the North Atlantic. During the Middle Ages, fourteen monastic houses were opened in Iceland and two in Norse Greenland, all following the Benedictine or Augustinian Orders. Keywords: Iceland; Norse Greenland; monasticism; Benedictine Order; Augustine Order The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the medieval monastic houses operating in the northernmost dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church: Iceland and Norse Greenland. At the same time, it questions the supposed isolation of these societies from the rest of the Continent. Research on activities in Iceland and Greenland shows that the transnational movement of monasticism reached these two countries as it reached other parts of Northern Europe. Fourteen monastic houses were established in Iceland and two in Norse Greenland during the Middle Ages. Two of the monastic houses in Iceland and one in Norse Greenland were nunneries, whereas the others were monasteries. Five of the monasteries established in Iceland were short lived, while the other nine operated for Citation: Kristjánsdóttir, Steinunn. centuries. All were closed due to the Reformation around the mid-sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARING MYSTICISMS in ICELAND and FAROE ISLANDS Christophe Pons
    THE PROBLEM WITH ISLANDS: COMPARING MYSTICISMS IN ICELAND AND FAROE ISLANDS Christophe Pons To cite this version: Christophe Pons. THE PROBLEM WITH ISLANDS: COMPARING MYSTICISMS IN ICELAND AND FAROE ISLANDS. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 2009, 22 (2), pp.43-61. halshs- 01142960 HAL Id: halshs-01142960 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01142960 Submitted on 16 Apr 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NJRS-2-2009.fm Page 145 Tuesday, October 13, 2009 9:32 AM Nordic Journal of Religion and Society (2009), 22 (2): 145–163 Christophe Pons THE PROBLEM WITH ISLANDS: COMPARING MYSTICISMS IN ICELAND AND FAROE ISLANDS Abstract Through the analysis of spiritualist and christian mysticisms, this paper is bringing to comparison the two opposite religious orientations that have been distinctively accepted, followed and dif- fused in Iceland (modern esotericism) and Faroe Islands (Protestant asceticism). Historical cir- cumstances and external interactions give some clues for the understanding of these orientations. But the question
    [Show full text]