Update Briefing Asia Briefing N°131 Kathmandu/Brussels, 13 December 2011 Nepal’S Peace Process: the Endgame Nears

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update Briefing Asia Briefing N°131 Kathmandu/Brussels, 13 December 2011 Nepal’S Peace Process: the Endgame Nears Update Briefing Asia Briefing N°131 Kathmandu/Brussels, 13 December 2011 Nepal’s Peace Process: The Endgame Nears post-constitution government to oversee the next election, I. OVERVIEW which should take place some months after the new con- stitution is adopted. The Maoists’ main coalition partner, Nepal’s peace process has moved into a phase of defini- the Samyukta Loktantrik Madhesi Morcha (Morcha), an tive progress. More than five years after the ceasefire, the alliance of five Madhes-based parties, has often been seen parties have reached a deal on the Maoist fighters, who will as fractious and anti-Maoist, but the strength of the front leave the cantonments and enter the army or civilian life. and the new government challenges that perception. Final- An unofficial deal sets out power-sharing arrangements ly, there has been a gradual shift in India’s policy line in until the next election. The parties are focusing on the 2011, reversing an often hostile approach to the Maoists critical task of writing a new constitution, which promises in favour of accommodation and cooperation. a deep restructuring of the state to become more repre- sentative and decentralised. Challenges remain, including After the 1 November agreement, the Maoist combatants from continuously evolving coalition dynamics and divi- were surveyed and chose either integration into the na- sions within parties. There will also have to be further tional army or voluntary retirement with a cash package. discussions on the combatants. As the parties discuss fed- More fighters chose integration into the Nepal Army (NA) eralism, which of all peace process issues goes most to than the 6,500 allowed by the deal. This opens up another the heart of ordinary Nepalis’ expectations and anxieties, negotiation on the final number. Combatants likewise groups within and outside the Constituent Assembly will showed themselves to be unhappy about decisions made see their options narrow, which could strain the process. on individual qualifications for entry into the NA. Ranks Yet, this is still the best chance the parties have had to have not been decided yet either. The special concerns of reach formal closure on the war and to institute some of fighters with disabilities will also have to be addressed. the fundamental changes they promised, provided they Discussions could be protracted, but are not likely to derail have the courage to make far-sighted compromises. the constitution writing process. The breakthrough on 1 November was the result of a se- The term of the Constituent Assembly (CA) was renewed ries of realignments between many political leaders and for six months, from 1 December, and the state restructur- factions of parties, which strengthened the futures of cer- ing commission, controversial but mandated by the interim tain individuals and acknowledged their political lines. The constitution, was formed. The commission should build major players also had few unused tools left in the nego- on proposals already prepared in the CA and also provide tiating process, and gratuitous inflexibility and stalling recommendations to that body. Its composition, however, had run their course as bargaining tactics. Major power suggests that critical decisions will be taken elsewhere, at centres in all three parties, including a dogmatic faction the highest political level. Indeed, senior leaders are on of the Maoists, resent having been left out of the talks. track to negotiate compromises on the proposed federal But while they can obstruct and slow the process, they states and system. They will have to balance acknowledg- cannot derail it. A consensus government will have to be ing historical identities and discrimination and the rights formed sooner or later, though it is unclear whether the of Nepal’s many ethnic, caste and linguistic groups. present government will need to resign or whether the The manner in which negotiations take place matters as opposition will join in. much as the outcome. Historically marginalised communi- Power-sharing remains the most tangible dividend com- ties, their representatives in mainstream parties and other ing out of the peace process to date, though there was ethnic formations have to be engaged, rather than simply no mention of it in the November 2006 Comprehensive be informed of decisions. Centralised, top-down decisions Peace Agreement (CPA). The formation of a Maoist-led on federalism cannot be sold easily outside Kathmandu, government in August 2011 was the first factor that made where identity-based groups and sceptics of federalism progress possible. Without that, the party would have have been mobilising. There is supposed to be public con- been reluctant to give up its army. Following that was the sultation on proposed constitutional provisions. Rather Maoists’ willingness to unofficially accept the main op- than treat this as a formality, the parties should see it as a position party, the Nepali Congress (NC), as leader of the way to increase the buy-in of various groups. Nepal’s Peace Process: The Endgame Nears Crisis Group Asia Briefing N°131, 13 December 2011 Page 2 As the future landscape becomes clearer, resistance could integration of some Maoist fighters into the Nepal Amy well come from traditionally powerful constituencies that (NA) was unavoidable and that continuously stalling was are outside the CA and see the proposed changes as a ze- no longer rewarding.2 The deal is critical for the Maoist ro-sum game, including a mix of anti-federalists, Hindu fighters, whose future has been up in the air for five years. groups that oppose secularism and some royalists. The More broadly, it paved the way for progress on the consti- parties in the CA and their factions will also look to ex- tution, which was stalled as long as there were two armies tract the most from the process, and parliamentary parties in the country. on the right are regrouping. For many, the temptation could be to not negotiate, but instead to sharpen social The Maoist party was clear that it had to be in power be- polarisation along the divisions the peace process seeks to fore it could make a deal that would dismantle the People’s narrow: ethnic, religious, cultural, regional and class. Liberation Army (PLA). The other parties and New Delhi were equally clear that a Maoist-led government could not The peace process has informally come to mean only the be headed by the party chairman, Pushpa Kamal Dahal question of the Maoist fighters, rather than the whole of “Prachanda”, who they felt had been unreliable and an- the CPA. Politicians do regard the constitution as a matter tagonistic when he was prime minister.3 For them, as well of urgency, but they are also exhausted and want to see as for the faction of the Maoist party led by Senior Vice- the process quickly concluded, so Nepal can go back to Chairman Mohan Baidya “Kiran”, that felt Prachanda ex- business as usual. The commitment to democratise the erted too much control over the party, senior leader Babu- Nepal Army has already been dropped. The commission ram Bhattarai was a broadly acceptable option.4 on land reform is a dead-end. The issue of justice for war- era abuses continues to be defined by the lack of incen- tive for all actors to deal with it. These issues and the complexities of federalism will not lose relevance simply 2 A maximum of 6,500 ex-combatants are to be integrated into because the mainstream parties decide to ignore them. a new Nepal Army (NA) directorate responsible for forest and Whether or not they prove to be drivers of mass mobilisa- industrial security, development support and crisis manage- tion or violence in the coming months, they will be criti- ment. There is to be some relaxation of the NA’s regular re- cal ahead of the next general election. Nepal’s political cruitment standards for age, educational qualifications and mar- class needs to make some difficult decisions rather quick- ital status. Whatever the final number of former Maoist fighters ly, so as to ensure its own relevance. are chosen for integration, they are to comprise 35 per cent of the personnel in the directorate, whose remaining personnel are to be drawn from other parts of the NA. Cash packages for combatants to be rehabilitated have also been negotiated. See II. A NEW DEAL, NEW CHALLENGES also Crisis Group Report, Nepal: From Two Armies to One, op. cit. Other elements of the deal include forming the commis- sions on enforced disappearance and truth and reconciliation, The 1 November deal for the first time laid out concrete addressing “legal cases of the conflict period” in keeping with options for the integration and rehabilitation of Maoist the CPA and the 2007 interim constitution and providing relief fighters and revived some of the major commitments of packages for conflict victims. For more on justice and repara- the CPA.1 For the Maoists, this was a long-overdue demon- tions issues, see Crisis Group Reports N°184, Nepal: Peace stration of their party’s willingness to give up its military. and Justice, 14 January 2010 and Nepal: From Two Armies to For the NC and other parties, this meant accepting that One, op. cit. The parties committed to forming a national con- sensus government as the peace process and constitution writ- ing proceeded. This left the door open for further disputes on sequencing. Similarly, there is no clarity on how land reform 1 For recent Crisis Group reporting on the evolving political will take place, although the CPA calls for a commission. Fi- dynamic, the connection between peace process issues and nally, the CPA and interim constitution present as parallel the power-sharing, and other contested issues related to the CA and commitments to integration and rehabilitation of Maoist army the Maoist army, see Asia Briefing N°120, Nepal’s Fitful Peace personnel and democratisation of the Nepal Army, but the latter Process, 7 April 2011; and Asia Report N°211, Nepal: From is entirely absent from the new agreement.
Recommended publications
  • Asian Centre for Human Rights
    Asian Centre For Human Rights BRIEFING PAPERS ON NEPAL ISSUE No. 3 Embargoed for : 1 September, 2009 Madhes: The challenges and opportunities for a stable Nepal 1. Introduction dispensation. The Sadbhavana Party continues to occupy one ministerial portfolio. One of the least reported, but most significant changes in Nepali politics since the 2006 People’s Movement is the These three Madhesi parties were critical in helping Madhav emergence of the ‘Madhes’ as a political force. With the Nepal form a majority government. Even now, if two of opening of the democratic space, the Madhesis, who largely these parties withdraw support, the coalition runs the risk but not exclusively live in the southern plains and constitute of losing the confidence vote on the floor of the house.6 33 percent of the population1, asserted themselves. The Madhes speak languages like Maithili, Bhojpuri, Awadhi, All these parties have come together on an anti-Maoist Hindi and Urdu2 and have extensive cross-border ties with plank, sharing the belief that the Maoists must be stopped India3. They challenged the hill-centric notion of Nepali in their quest for ‘total state capture’. They have termed the nationalism and staked claim for greater representation in alliance as a broader democratic alliance. But it is riddled the state structure.4 with internal contradictions. After a period of two and a half volatile years which IN THIS ISSUE has seen the repeated formation and fragmentation 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1 of Madhesi parties, the proliferation of militant armed groups in the Tarai, and reluctant measures by 2. THE ISSUES IN MAHDES .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society in Uncivil Places: Soft State and Regime Change in Nepal
    48 About this Issue Recent Series Publications: Policy Studies 48 Policy Studies Policy This monograph analyzes the role of civil Policy Studies 47 society in the massive political mobilization Supporting Peace in Aceh: Development and upheavals of 2006 in Nepal that swept Agencies and International Involvement away King Gyanendra’s direct rule and dra- Patrick Barron, World Bank Indonesia matically altered the structure and character Adam Burke, London University of the Nepali state and politics. Although the opposition had become successful due to a Policy Studies 46 strategic alliance between the seven parlia- Peace Accords in Northeast India: mentary parties and the Maoist rebels, civil Journey over Milestones Places in Uncivil Society Civil society was catapulted into prominence dur- Swarna Rajagopalan, Political Analyst, ing the historic protests as a result of nation- Chennai, India al and international activities in opposition to the king’s government. This process offers Policy Studies 45 new insights into the role of civil society in The Karen Revolution in Burma: Civil Society in the developing world. Diverse Voices, Uncertain Ends By focusing on the momentous events of Ardeth Maung Thawnghmung, University of the nineteen-day general strike from April Massachusetts, Lowell 6–24, 2006, that brought down the 400- Uncivil Places: year-old Nepali royal dynasty, the study high- Policy Studies 44 lights the implications of civil society action Economy of the Conflict Region within the larger political arena involving con- in Sri Lanka: From Embargo to Repression ventional actors such as political parties, trade Soft State and Regime Muttukrishna Sarvananthan, Point Pedro unions, armed rebels, and foreign actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms Procurement Decision Making Volume II: Chile, Greece, Malaysia
    4. Malaysia Dagmar Hellmann-Rajanayagam* I. Introduction Malaysia has become one of the major political players in the South-East Asian region with increasing economic weight. Even after the economic crisis of 1997–98, despite defence budgets having been slashed, the country is still deter- mined to continue to modernize and upgrade its armed forces. Malaysia grappled with the communist insurgency between 1948 and 1962. It is a democracy with a strong government, marked by ethnic imbalances and affirmative policies, strict controls on public debate and a nascent civil society. Arms procurement is dominated by the military. Public apathy and indifference towards defence matters have been a noticeable feature of the society. Public opinion has disregarded the fact that arms procurement decision making is an element of public policy making as a whole, not only restricted to decisions relating to military security. An examination of the country’s defence policy- making processes is overdue. This chapter inquires into the role, methods and processes of arms procure- ment decision making as an element of Malaysian security policy and the public policy-making process. It emphasizes the need to focus on questions of public accountability rather than transparency, as transparency is not a neutral value: in many countries it is perceived as making a country more vulnerable.1 It is up 1 Ball, D., ‘Arms and affluence: military acquisitions in the Asia–Pacific region’, eds M. Brown et al., East Asian Security (MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1996), p. 106. * The author gratefully acknowledges the help of a number of people in putting this study together.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    ASIA PACIFIC NEPAL FEDERAL COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: LOW INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: NEPALESE RUPEE (NPR) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 147 180 km 2 GDP: 79 billion (current PPP international dollars), 2 697 dollars per inhabitant (2017) Population: 29.305 million inhabitants (2017), an increase of 1.2% Real GDP growth: 7.5 % (2017 vs 2016) per year (2010-2015) Unemployment rate: 2.7 % (2017) Density: 199 inhabitants / km 2 Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 196 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population: 19.3 % of national population Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF): 34% of GDP (2017) Urban population growth: 3.2 % (2017 vs 2016) HDI: 0.574 (medium), ranking 149 (2017) Capital city: Kathmandu (4.5 % of national population) Poverty rate: 15% (2010) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Following the end in 2006 of a decade-long civil war, Nepal’s governance framework is currently in the transition from being a Monarchy to a multiparty democratic republic. With the promulgation of the new Constitution in 2015, Nepal moved from a unitary form of government to a federal one with a strong focus on decentralization based on “cooperative federalism”. The new federation has three tiers of government, namely federal, state and local, whereby powers shall be exercised pursuant to the Constitution and the state laws. The Constitution has assigned both exclusive and concurrent powers, to be jointly exercised by the federal and the state levels or jointly by all three tiers of government. The jurisdiction of the local governments is outlined under Schedule 8 of the Constitution, which establishes that local governments are responsible for development activities and for mobilizing the necessary resources to carry out such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal's Troubled Tarai Region
    NEPAL’S TROUBLED TARAI REGION Asia Report N°136 – 9 July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. MADHES AND MADHESIS: THE ISSUES ............................................................... 2 III. POLITICS AND PLAYERS.......................................................................................... 5 A. POLITICS IN THE TARAI .........................................................................................................5 B. PARTIES ................................................................................................................................6 C. MILITANT AND FRINGE GROUPS ...........................................................................................9 IV. THE MADHESI MOVEMENT .................................................................................. 12 A. VIOLENCE IN THE TARAI .....................................................................................................12 B. THE RESPONSE....................................................................................................................13 V. THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY........................................................................... 15 A. THE LIE OF THE LAND.........................................................................................................15 B. THE
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal, November 2005
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Nepal, November 2005 COUNTRY PROFILE: NEPAL November 2005 COUNTRY Formal Name: Kingdom of Nepal (“Nepal Adhirajya” in Nepali). Short Form: Nepal. Term for Citizen(s): Nepalese. Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Kathmandu. Major Cities: According to the 2001 census, only Kathmandu had a population of more than 500,000. The only other cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants were Biratnagar, Birgunj, Lalitpur, and Pokhara. Independence: In 1768 Prithvi Narayan Shah unified a number of states in the Kathmandu Valley under the Kingdom of Gorkha. Nepal recognizes National Unity Day (January 11) to commemorate this achievement. Public Holidays: Numerous holidays and religious festivals are observed in particular regions and by particular religions. Holiday dates also may vary by year and locality as a result of the multiple calendars in use—including two solar and three lunar calendars—and different astrological calculations by religious authorities. In fact, holidays may not be observed if religious authorities deem the date to be inauspicious for a specific year. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Sahid Diwash (Martyrs’ Day; movable date in January); National Unity Day and birthday of Prithvi Narayan Shah (January 11); Maha Shiva Ratri (Great Shiva’s Night, movable date in February or March); Rashtriya Prajatantra Diwash (National Democracy Day, movable date in February); Falgu Purnima, or Holi (movable date in February or March); Ram Nawami (Rama’s Birthday, movable date in March or April); Nepali New Year (movable date in April); Buddha’s Birthday (movable date in April or May); King Gyanendra’s Birthday (July 7); Janai Purnima (Sacred Thread Ceremony, movable date in August); Children’s Day (movable date in August); Dashain (Durga Puja Festival, movable set of five days over a 15-day period in September or October); Diwali/Tihar (Festival of Lights and Laxmi Puja, movable set of five days in October); and Sambhidhan Diwash (Constitution Day, movable date in November).
    [Show full text]
  • Deuba's Intriguing Dilemma and His Credibility Chasm
    WITHOUT F EAR OR FAVOUR Nepal’s largest selling English daily Vol XXIX No. 50 | 8 pages | Rs.5 O O Printed simultaneously in Kathmandu, Biratnagar, Bharatpur and Nepalgunj 37.9 C 3.2 C Friday, April 09, 2021 | 27-12-2077 Nepalgunj Jumla Deuba’s intriguing dilemma and his credibility chasm The onus of taking political process forward is upon the Congress chief. But given the dynamics in his party, and his relations with Oli and other parties, he is hesitating. ANIL GIRI with yet another issue—the party’s KATHMANDU, APRIL 8 14th general convention. Legally, the party must hold the Nepali Congress President Sher general convention by the middle of Bahadur Deuba is on the horns of a September and Deuba wants to lead dilemma. the party again. The Communist Party of Nepal Deuba is caught between whether (Maoist Centre) is offering him the to take the government leadership post of prime prime minister should or focus on general convention which he agree to form an alliance, along could earn him party presidency once with the Janata Samajbadi again. Party, so as to unseat Despite the government’s House Prime Minister KP dissolution move having been over- Sharma Oli. For a turned by the Supreme Court, Oli four-time prime min- has refused to step down, and ister, the offer is many say Deuba, as the lead- tempting. But there is er of the opposition, should a catch. have been at the forefront Deuba is unsure to press for the prime about the Janata minister’s resignation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    No. 43 Working Papers Working Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India‘s Role in Nepal‘s Recent Constitution-Making Process Prakash Bhattarai December 2018 1 Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India’s Role in Nepal’s Recent Constitution-Making Process1 Prakash Bhattarai ABSTRACT Nepal’s post-conflict constitution-making process has seen the involvement of many international actors. While studies on democracy promotion, to this day, mainly focus on Western “donors” and international organizations, this paper looks at the role played by India in the complicated process of moving from a peace agreement to the establishment of an inclusive, democratic constitution in Nepal. More specifically, it is analysed how a powerful neighbouring democracy (India) participated in what is essentially a domestic negotiation process (constitution-making) with a view to influencing the emerging demo- cratic regime. In terms of the issues on the negotiation table, the analysis shows that India, in pushing for an inclusive constitution, pursued the specific agenda of supporting the inclusion of the Madheshis, an ethnic group mostly living in Nepal’s Terai region. In terms of negotiation strategies, the paper identifies four different ways in which India tried to influence the constitution: high-level dialogue; economic blockade; international coalition building; and targeted support of domestic oppositional forces in Nepal. Com- prehensive as this negotiation strategy was, it only met with partial success. Parameters that limited India’s influence included the domestic strength and legitimacy of the official Nepali position (elite alignment; popular support) as well as scepticism concerning In- dia’s role in Nepal, which was reinforced by India’s overly partisan agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex-A List-Of-Dele
    ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM SECURITY POLICY CONFERENCE (ASPC) 8 MAY 2008 SINGAPORE List of Delegates Australia Stephen Merchant Deputy Secretary Intelligence, Security and International Policy Department of Defence Lachlan Colquhoun Assistant Secretary, Southeast Asia International Policy Division Department of Defence David Stephens Assistant Director, Regional Interests International Policy Division Department of Defence Bangladesh Mosud Mannan ndc Director-General International Organisations, Non-Aligned Movement and ARF Ministry of Foreign Affairs Nurun Nahar Deputy Secretary Ministry of Defence 1 Brunei Darulsalam Pengiran Hassanan Pengiran Johari Director of Defence Policy Ministry of Defence Jolkipli Haji Hidop Senior Research of Defence Directorate of Defence Policy Ministry of Defence Cambodia GEN Neang Phat Secretary of State Ministry of National Defense LG Nem Sowath Advisor and Director of Cabinet of DPM/DM Deputy Secretary General Ministry of National Defense LG Phorn Nara Deputy Director-General of Material and Technique Ministry of National Defense COL Lay Chenda Chief of ASEAN Affairs Bureau Policy and Planning Department Ministry of National Defense Canada CAPT Christopher Gunn Director Asia-Pacific Policy Elizabeth Baldwin-Jones Deputy Director IDR, Defence and Security Relations Department of Foreign Affairs 2 China MG Chen Xiaogong Assistant Chief of the General Staff, People’s Liberation Army Snr CAPT(N) Guan Youfei Deputy Chief Foreign Affairs Office, Ministry National Defence Snr COL Liu Zhuo Li Defence Attaché to Singapore
    [Show full text]
  • E Booklet -20 Reforms in 2020
    DEFENCE REFORMS Reforms in TRANSFORMATION TODAY FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Shramena Sarvam Sadhyam Our country has been debating for MoD “ long about reforms in Armed Forces and many commissions and their reports underline the same. To further sharpen coordination between the forces, India will have Chief of Defence Staff, CDS, which will “ make the forces even more effective. Shri Narendra Modi PM Shri Narendra Modi's address to Prime Minister of India the nation - 15th August 2019 Our Government’s priorities in Defence Sector are very clear. Our Armed Forces, “along with other uniformed forces are the backbone of security architecture of the Nation – both Internal Security as well as security on the borders. To meet the requirements of the changing technology, there is a constant effort to equip our Armed forces with the MoD latest weapons to meet challenges emanating from the land, air and the sea; and by bringing about jointness and modernization through reforms such as appointment of Chief of Defence Staff, and other necessary reforms in the Armed Forces. Strengthening border infrastructure not only improves the logistics of our armed forces but also contributes to the local economy. Under the decisive leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the government is fully geared up to face any “ security challenge. Shri Rajnath Singh Defence Minister of India MoD 20 Reforms 2020 Across the Defence sector, through policy changes, innovation and digital transformation LANDMARK ACHIEVEMENT India gets its first Chief of Defence Staff To increase efficiency and coordination, while reducing duplication, a new position was introduced that would usher greater jointness in the Armed Forces – making him the chief military adviser to the Government of India and the Ministry of Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges
    Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges 1 Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges Edited by Bishnu Raj Upreti Rajan Bhattarai Geja Sharma Wagle Published by Nepal Institute for Policy Studies and South Asia Regional Coordination Office of NCCR (North-South) Kathmandu 2013 Citation: Upreti BR, Bhattarai R, Wagle GS, editors. 2013. Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges. Kathmandu: Nepal Institute for Policy Studies (NIPS) and South Asia Regional Coordination Office of NCCR (North-South). Copyright © 2013 by NIPS and NCCR North-South, Kathmandu, Nepal. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-9937-2-5257-7 Subsidised price: NRs. 400/- Layout & cover design: Jyoti Khatiwada Printed by: Heidel Press Pvt. Ltd. Dillibazar, Kathmandu Cover Concept: Safal Ghimire Disclaimer: The content and materials presented in this book are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the institution with which the authors are affiliated. Dedication To the millions of people who are suffering from human insecurity. Acknowledgements The issue of security is a little-debated matter in our academic domain. When it comes to dealing human security, we often confront questions like: What constitutes human security? Why has it become so pertinent for a country like Nepal? How can human security be made tenable? These and many other questions on human security came to our mind before we decided to publish this book. This is our small attempt to address some of those questions and generate debate and discussion on the increasingly changing security dynamics of Nepal. This book is the collective outcome of the efforts of several people.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Jana Andolan II in Nepal
    Occasional Paper: Peace Building Series No.1 FutureGenerations Applied Community Graduate School Change and Conservation PeoPle’s ParticiPation in conflict transformation: a case study of Jana andolan II in nePal Bandita Sijapati Social Science Baha February 2009 Occasional Papers of the Future Generations Graduate School explore community-based approaches to social development, health, nature conservation, peace building, and governance. Faculty, alumni, and partner organizations present their field studies and applied research. www.future.edu People’s Participation in Conflict Transformation: A Case Study of Jana Andolan II in Nepal Rise from every village, rise from every settlement To change the face of this country, rise Those who have a pen in hand, bring your pen and rise Those who can play an instrument, bring your instrument and rise Those who have a tool in hand, bring your tool and rise Those who have nothing at all, bring your voice and rise.1 I. INTRODUCTION In April 2006, there was a country-wide people’s movement in Nepal, popularly known as the Jana Andolan II,2 against King Gyanendra’s direct rule3 following a 12-point understanding reached between the Seven Party Alliance4 and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), which was leading a communist insurgency against the state. The 19-day-long Jana Andolan II5 (People’s Movement II) ended direct rule by Gyanendra, forced him to return power to the reinstated parliament, and created a conducive environment for the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between the government and the rebel Maoists in November 2006. The success of Jana Andolan II in thus ending the decade-long conflict that had affected all parts of the country has thus been hailed by many as being exemplary of the ways in which engaged citizenry and communities at the local level can have an impact on the resolution and transformation of violent conflict at the national level.
    [Show full text]