Olympic History on the World Wide Web Thomas D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rescinding a Bid: Stockholm's Uncertain Relationship with The
Rescinding a bid: Stockholm’s uncertain relationship with the Olympic Games Erik Johan Olson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Geography Robert D. Oliver Luke Juran Korine N. Kolivras February 16, 2018 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: sport mega-events, urban development, Olympic bidding, Agenda 2020, bid failure, urban politics, bid strategy Copyright 2018 Rescinding a bid: Stockholm’s uncertain relationship with the Olympic Games Erik Olson ABSTRACT The City of Stockholm has undergone a curious process of considering whether to launch a bid for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games. That Stockholm has contemplated launching a bid is not surprising from a regional perspective—the Olympic Games have not been held in a Scandinavian country since Lillehammer, Norway played host in 1994 and Sweden has never hosted the Winter Olympics. A potential bid from Stockholm would also be consistent with Sweden’s self-identification and embracement of being a ‘sportive nation’. Failed applications by the Swedish cities of Gothenburg, Falun, and Östersund to host the Winter Olympic Games confirm the long-standing interest of the Swedish Olympic Committee to secure the Games, although it should be noted that the Swedish Olympic Committee did not submit a bid for the 2006, 2010, 2014 or 2018 Winter Olympic Games competitions. Although recent reports indicate that Stockholm will not vie for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games, the notion that the city was even considering the option remains surprising. Stockholm had withdrawn its bid from the 2022 bidding competition citing a variety of concerns including a lack of government and public support, financial uncertainty, as well as the post-event viability of purpose-built infrastructure. -
Gd Editorial
IOC MA RKETING MEDIA GU IDE BEIJING 2008 IOC MARKETING MEDIA GUIDE / 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction to Olympic Marketing Structure 03 2. Broadcast and Digital media preview 05 3. Benefits of Olympic Partnerships 08 4. The TOP Programme 09 Coca-Cola 10 Atos Origin 12 GE 14 Johnson & Johnson 16 Kodak 18 Lenovo 20 Manulife 22 McDonald’s 24 Omega 26 Panasonic 28 Samsung 30 Visa 32 5. Licensing 35 6. Ticketing 37 7. Protecting the Olympic brand 38 8. Promotional campaign 41 9. Key contacts 43 The financial figures contained in this document are provided for general information purposes, are estimates and are not intended to represent formal accounting reports of the IOC, the Organising Committees for the Olympic Games (OCOGs) or other organisations within the Olympic Movement. For further historical facts and figures, please see the Olympic Marketing Fact File (http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_344.pdf ) IOC MARKETING MEDIA GUIDE / 3 1. INTRODUCTION TO OLYMPIC MARKETING STRUCTURE As an event that commands the focus of the media and the attention of the entire world for two weeks every other year, the Olympic Games are one of the most effective international marketing platforms in the world, reaching billions of people in over 200 countries. Today, marketing partners are an intrinsic part of the Olympic Family and the Olympic marketing programme has become the driving force behind the promotion, financial security and stability of the Olympic Movement. OBJECTIVES The Olympic Movement revenue generation programme is designed to -
NEWSLETTER Supplementingtrack & FIELD NEWS Twice Monthly
TRACKNEWSLETTER SupplementingTRACK & FIELD NEWS twice monthly. Vol. 10, No. 1 August 14, 1963 Page 1 Jordan Shuffles Team vs. Germany British See 16'10 1-4" by Pennel Hannover, Germany, July 31- ~Aug. 1- -Coach Payton Jordan London, August 3 & 5--John Pennel personally raised the shuffled his personnel around for the dual meet with West Germany, world pole vault record for the fifth time this season to 16'10¼" (he and came up with a team that carried the same two athletes that com has tied it once), as he and his U.S. teammates scored 120 points peted against the Russians in only six of the 21 events--high hurdles, to beat Great Britain by 29 points . The British athl_etes held the walk, high jump, broad jump, pole vault, and javelin throw. His U.S. Americans to 13 firsts and seven 1-2 sweeps. team proceeded to roll up 18 first places, nine 1-2 sweeps, and a The most significant U.S. defeat came in the 440 relay, as 141 to 82 triumph. the Jones boys and Peter Radford combined to run 40 . 0, which equal The closest inter-team race was in the steeplechase, where ed the world record for two turns. Again slowed by poor baton ex both Pat Traynor and Ludwig Mueller were docked in 8: 44. 4 changes, Bob Hayes gained up to five yards in the final leg but the although the U.S. athlete was given the victory. It was Traynor's U.S. still lost by a tenth. Although the American team had hoped second fastest time of the season, topped only by his mark against for a world record, the British victory was not totally unexpected. -
The Promotion of the Youth Olympic Games: a Greek Perspective by Lawrence W
The Promotion of the Youth Olympic Games: A Greek Perspective by Lawrence W. Judge, Ball State University; Eleni D. Kantzidou, 2007a, 2007c). The 2010 Youth Olympic Games (YOG) joined University of Ioannina, Greece; David Bellar, University of the Summer Olympic Games and the Winter Olympic Games Louisiana Lafayette; Jeffrey Petersen, Baylor University; Erin becoming the third sport festival event introduced by the IOC. The Gilreath, Ball State University; and Karin Surber CISCO Systems, inaugural YOG were held in the summer of 2010 in Singapore. Indianapolis Youth sport has not evolved without challenges and criticisms. This new Olympic event for adolescents has evoked responses Abstract from loyal advocates and equally committed critics. Supporters One of the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) objectives claimed the YOG will provide a multi-cultural experience and is to reignite interest in Olympic sports in the midst of a generation education, while fostering the Olympic spirit which helps develop of adolescents who have become increasingly overweight and strong character. Critics of the YOG worried that a worldwide inactive. In an effort to accomplish this objective, the Youth spotlight on a youth competition would only fuel more of what Olympic Games (YOG) were created, and the inaugural event is already negative about youth sport. Some of the problems was held in the summer of 2010. The event has evoked a positive associated with youth sport include early specialization (Watts, response from loyal advocates and equally negative feedback from 2002), overtraining (Kentta, Hassmen, & Raglin, 2001), lack of committed critics. Public awareness and effective messaging of the qualified coaches (Judge, Petersen, & Lydum, 2009), and doping YOG will play a critical role in the future success of subsequent (Digel, 2008). -
Basic Questions About World Winter Games
BASIC QUESTIONS ABOUT WORLD WINTER GAMES Irena Martínková Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University in Prague José Martího 31, 162 52 Praha 6, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract This paper asks three basic questions concerning world winter games (Winter Olympic Games and related events). I shall point at the features of these games that we usually take for granted. The three basic questions asked in this text will concern the three main words from the title: ‘world’, ‘winter’, and ‘games’. Firstly, I shall ask questions about what winter sport means, which is related to the origin of the Winter Olympic Games at the beginning of the 20th century. Secondly, I shall highlight the topic of internationality concerning winter games, which has always been problematic. Thirdly, I shall explain why Olympic Games are ‘Games’ and not ‘Sports’. Here, I shall present the distinction between ‘Olympic Games’ and ‘world championships’, which was an important distinction for Pierre de Coubertin and his followers, but which has now almost disappeared. Introduction This paper examines the topic of world winter games. World winter games are international events that comprise winter sport competitions, but are considered to be more than the sum of sport competitions, and as such are called ‘games’. These include mainly the Winter Olympic Games, but not exclusively – they also relate to Winter Paralympic Games, Winter Youth Olympic Games as well as the European Youth Olympic Festivals, since these events are based on the concepts of Olympism. Presently, the Winter Olympic Games, being one of the world’s most important sport events, influences our thinking about sport in general, as well as about winter sports. -
Etn1959 Vol06 10
' / \ '_. k I ~ / l f RACKNEWSL£1TE r . ".' , also KV\ownas - [1R~tlf N'1ts1~trERI , , I _/_ sJ , (OFFlCl~L P\.l8L\C/\TION Or l'RKK NUiS OF i11E 'WO~\.0J\lN1t.1c) Vol. 6, No, 10, Dec. 23, 1959 Semi-Monthly --$6per y~ar by first class tbaH_. NEWS METROPOLITAN AAU FIELD EVENT MEET, New York City, Dec, 5: 35 lb. wt. throw, Engel (NYPC) 63'8½" (scratch); SP, D'Atnico (Manhattan frosh) 56'7~" (six-foot handicap), Marchiony (Manhattan) 56'7¼" (1'10" handicap); BJ, McBride (Manhattan) i4'2" --(11 811 hanaicap); PV, , Barr (St. John's) 14'9" (1'9'' handicap). ' , , STANFORD ALL-COMERS, (all SCYG unless noted}: Dec. 12:-1320, Sargent 3: 07. 6; Curtis 3:08. 7; McGee, 3:14. 7. Dec. 19: 3,000 meters, 40 yards: Beatty 8:36. 3; Kelly 8:43. O; Bishop 8:44. ' 0; Sargent 8: 50. 3; McGee 8:53. O; l0Oy, Thomason 10. 2; 660, Toomey (Colo _,_) 1:22.2, Mccalla (Berkeley H.S.) 1:26.0. " ' WESTERN HEMISPHERE MARATHON: Culver City, Calif. Dec. 12: Torn Ryan (Culver City A.C.) 2:28:30, new ·course record. Old record / 2:32:35.4, Allan, 1958. SOUTH AF RICA: Sasolburg, Nov., 25: l00y, Gamper (GerrhaIJ.y) 9. 9; -440, P.otgiefu:,;, 48. 2; mile; Brenner (Gerrnruty) 4d2. 2, Clark 4:14. 3; 220LH, Pqtgieter 23. 6; SP, Wegmann · -(Germany) 56'5½"; DT, du Plessis 178'2". Pretoria, Nov. 28: l0Oy, Bromberg 9.5, Jefferys 9. 5, Luxon 9. 6, Gamper 9. 7; 440, Spence 46. -
Estimating the Determinants of Summer Olympic Game Performance, Pp. 39-47
Celik and Gius, International Journal of Applied Economics, 11(1), March 2014, 39-47 39 Estimating the Determinants of Summer Olympic Game Performance Onur Burak Celik* and Mark Gius* Yasar University and Quinnipiac University Abstract: Numerous prior studies have attempted to ascertain the determinants of Olympic medals awarded. Most studies have found that population and GDP were positively related to the number of Olympic medals awarded. The present study generally confirms these earlier results. In addition, lagged values of medals awarded were also significant, suggesting that prior performance is an excellent proxy of unobservable country-specific attributes that may contribute to overall Summer Olympic performance. Finally, using the models estimated in the present study, predictions were made for the 2012 Summer Olympics. These predictions were very similar to the actual values and thus serve as a test of the statistical robustness of the models estimated in this study. Keywords: Olympic Games, Medal Counts JEL Classification: L83 1. Introduction The Summer Olympic Games are one of the largest international sporting events in the world. It is a source of national pride to perform well and to win many medals at the Olympics. Nations spend millions of dollars in order to train athletes. Winning athletes are not only awarded medals but also typically receive monetary rewards from their home countries. Given the importance of the Olympic Games, it is not surprising that there has been much prior research on national Olympic performance (Emrich, Klein, Pitsch, and Pierdzioch, 2012; Vagenas and Vlachokyriakou, 2012; Forrest, Sanz, and Tena, 2010; Wu, Liang, and Yang, 2009; Li, Liang, Chen, and Morita, 2008; Lui and Suen, 2008; Rathke and Woitek, 2008; Bernard and Busse, 2004; Churilov and Flitman, 2004; Hoffman, Ging, and Ramasamy, 2004; Johnson, 2004; Lins, Gomes, de Mello, and de Mello, 2003; Tcha and Pershin, 2003; Lozano, Villa, Guerrero, and Cortes, 2002; Condon, Golden, and Wasil, 1999). -
Detailed List of Performances in the Six Selected Events
Detailed list of performances in the six selected events 100 metres women 100 metres men 400 metres women 400 metres men Result Result Result Result Year Athlete Country Year Athlete Country Year Athlete Country Year Athlete Country (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) 1928 Elizabeth Robinson USA 12.2 1896 Tom Burke USA 12.0 1964 Betty Cuthbert AUS 52.0 1896 Tom Burke USA 54.2 Stanislawa 1900 Frank Jarvis USA 11.0 1968 Colette Besson FRA 52.0 1900 Maxey Long USA 49.4 1932 POL 11.9 Walasiewicz 1904 Archie Hahn USA 11.0 1972 Monika Zehrt GDR 51.08 1904 Harry Hillman USA 49.2 1936 Helen Stephens USA 11.5 1906 Archie Hahn USA 11.2 1976 Irena Szewinska POL 49.29 1908 Wyndham Halswelle GBR 50.0 Fanny Blankers- 1908 Reggie Walker SAF 10.8 1980 Marita Koch GDR 48.88 1912 Charles Reidpath USA 48.2 1948 NED 11.9 Koen 1912 Ralph Craig USA 10.8 Valerie Brisco- 1920 Bevil Rudd SAF 49.6 1984 USA 48.83 1952 Marjorie Jackson AUS 11.5 Hooks 1920 Charles Paddock USA 10.8 1924 Eric Liddell GBR 47.6 1956 Betty Cuthbert AUS 11.5 1988 Olga Bryzgina URS 48.65 1924 Harold Abrahams GBR 10.6 1928 Raymond Barbuti USA 47.8 1960 Wilma Rudolph USA 11.0 1992 Marie-José Pérec FRA 48.83 1928 Percy Williams CAN 10.8 1932 Bill Carr USA 46.2 1964 Wyomia Tyus USA 11.4 1996 Marie-José Pérec FRA 48.25 1932 Eddie Tolan USA 10.3 1936 Archie Williams USA 46.5 1968 Wyomia Tyus USA 11.0 2000 Cathy Freeman AUS 49.11 1936 Jesse Owens USA 10.3 1948 Arthur Wint JAM 46.2 1972 Renate Stecher GDR 11.07 Tonique Williams- 1948 Harrison Dillard USA 10.3 1952 George Rhoden JAM 45.9 2004 BAH 49.41 1976 -
Hosting the Olympic Games: an Overstated Advantage in Sports History
The International Journal of the History of Sport ISSN: 0952-3367 (Print) 1743-9035 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fhsp20 Hosting the Olympic Games: an Overstated Advantage in Sports History Stephen Pettigrew & Danyel Reiche To cite this article: Stephen Pettigrew & Danyel Reiche (2016) Hosting the Olympic Games: an Overstated Advantage in Sports History, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 33:6-7, 635-647, DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2015.1132201 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2015.1132201 Published online: 01 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 58 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fhsp20 THE INtERNAtiONAL JOURNAL OF tHE HiStORY OF SPORt, 2016 VOL. 33, NOS. 6–7, 635–647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2015.1132201 Hosting the Olympic Games: An Overstated Advantage in Sports History Stephen Pettigrewa and Danyel Reicheb aDepartment of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; bDepartment of Political Studies and Public Administration, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Previous research on the home advantage in the history of the Olympic Games; Summer Olympic Games has found initial evidence that host nations have Olympics; Winter Olympics; won more medals than non-hosts. In this paper, we argue that these home advantage; International Olympic findings are a myth of sports history, providing poor estimates of Committee the home advantage in the Olympics. We argue that selection bias accounts for the findings in previous work, which uses an empirical strategy of comparing host nations to all non-hosts and to historical performances of host countries with much smaller delegations. -
University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season
PAGE HEADER University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season 1 PAGEHISTORY HEADER annual results Indoor Indoor Outdoor Outdoor 1989 . 4th (68) . t10th(16) . 6th (57) . 30th (10) . Harvey Year Big Ten NCAA Big Ten NCAA Coach 1990 . 8th (26) . * . 6th (55) . * . Harvey 1901 . - . 1st (38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1991 . 4th (55) . * . 4th (58) . t74th(1) . Harvey 1902 . - . 1st (36) . - . Fitzpatrick 1992 . 10th(16) . * . 8th (35) . t59th(1) . Harvey 1903 . - . 1st (49) . - . Fitzpatrick 1993 . 8th (26) . * . 7th (61) . * . Harvey 1904 . - . 1st (32) . - . Fitzpatrick 1994 . 1st (91) . t17th(12) . 4th (94 .5) . t42nd(6) . Harvey 1905 . - . 2nd(38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1995 . 3rd (93) . t4th (25) . 2nd(112 .5) . t19th(11) . Harvey 1906 . - . 1st (62.8) . - . Fitzpatrick 1996 . t6th(37) . t30th(8) . 7th (71) . 18th (16) . Harvey 1918 . 1st (42) . 1st (37.5) . - . Farrell 1997 . 5th (67 .3) . t13th (15) . 3rd (97) . t13th(17) . Harvey 1919 . 1st (36.5) . 1st (44.5) . - . Farrell 1998 . 6th (62) . 6th (20) . 4th (97) . 23rd (10) . Harvey 1920 . 2nd (27 .5) . 2nd(30) . - . Farrell 1999 . 9th (50 .5) . t47th (2) . 7th (70 .5) . * . Harvey 1921 . 2nd (25 .5) . 2nd(35 .5) . 11th(5) . Farrell 2000 . 6th (62) . t41st (4) . 8th (65) . * . Warhurst 1922 . 5th (7 .33) . 7th (20 .6) . t6th(10) . Farrell 2001 . 7th (58) . * . t8th(43) . * . Warhurst 1923 . 1st (43.5) . 1st (57.5) . 1st (29 1/2) Farrell 2002 . ^ . * . 9th (39) . t28th (2) . Warhurst 1924 . 2nd (19) . 3rd (31 .5) . + . Farrell 2003 . 6th (51 .5) . t13th (16) . 7th (56) . t52nd(4) . Warhurst 1925 . 1st (22.33) . 1st (45.5) . + . Farrell 2004 . 3rd (94 .5) . -
OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Updated January 2020 2 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION
OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Updated January 2020 2 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION INTRODUCTION The Olympic Marketing Fact File is a reference accounting reports of the IOC, the Organising document on the marketing policies and Committees for the Olympic Games (OCOGs) programmes of the International Olympic or other organisations within the Olympic Committee (IOC), the Olympic Movement Movement. For the formal accounting reports and the Olympic Games. of the IOC, please visit www.olympic.org/ documents/ioc-annual-report In this document, the IOC has endeavoured to present a clear, simplified overview of Olympic The financial reports and statements of Movement revenue generation and distribution. OCOGs may differ from this document due Nevertheless, revenue comparisons between to different accounting principles and policies, Olympic marketing programmes must be such as those related to goods and services, carefully considered because marketing that have been adopted. The goods and programmes evolve over the course of each services (i.e. the provision of products, Olympiad, and each marketing programme is services and support) figures cited in this subject to different contractual terms and document have generally been accounted for distribution principles. based on contractual values, where available. Please note that commercial agreements The financial figures presented here do not reached with the IOC may be paid in different include any public moneys, including currencies depending on the nature of the donations, provided to the OCOGs, the agreement and the location of the parties. National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the For the purposes of the Marketing Fact File, International Federations of Olympic sports in order to provide comparisons across (IFs), or other governing bodies. -
THE GEOGRAPHY of the OLYMPICS Purpose
THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE OLYMPICS BY: Charles Bowman, Tipton High School Tipton IN, February 1992 Purpose: The purpose of this lesson is to focus on a current event in which students are understandably interested--the Winter and Summer Olympic Games. Students will plot both Summer and Winter Olympic sites since 1896 (the "where" question of geography) and will, then, analyze the pattern of dots created (the "why" question of geography). Teaching Level: grades 7-12. Geographic Themes: The geographic themes emphasized in this lesson are location and place. Objectives: At the conclusion of this lesson, students will have: 1. plotted both Winter and Summer Olympic sites on a world map, 2. analyzed data from a chart that lists where the Olympics have been held, 3. analyzed the pattern created by their maps, and 4. evaluated the possibility of Indianapolis holding the Summer Olympic games in the future. Materials Required: - World map for each student - Handout of The Geography of the Olympics activity for each student - Student atlas for each student or each group of students - Classroom atlases for more detailed analysis (the National Geograhic Atlas of the World, for example) Procedure: Opening 1. Ask the students, "How many of you have watched the television coverage of the Winter Olympics?"; "Where was it held?"; "Why was it held in Albertville?". Accept any answers at this point to encourage discussion. 2. Explain to the students about the purpose and objectives of this lesson. Development 3. Distribute the handout to the students. They may work in small groups if they wish. Have the students use student atlases for larger cities and more detailed atlases for smaller cities, specifically, Winter Olympic sites.