DOCSLIB.ORG

OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Updated January 2020 2 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Updated January 2020 2 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Updated January 2020 2 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION INTRODUCTION The Olympic Marketing Fact File is a reference accounting reports of the IOC, the Organising document on the marketing policies and Committees for the Olympic Games (OCOGs) programmes of the International Olympic or other organisations within the Olympic Committee (IOC), the Olympic Movement Movement. For the formal accounting reports and the Olympic Games. of the IOC, please visit www.olympic.org/ documents/ioc-annual-report In this document, the IOC has endeavoured to present a clear, simplified overview of Olympic The financial reports and statements of Movement revenue generation and distribution. OCOGs may differ from this document due Nevertheless, revenue comparisons between to different accounting principles and policies, Olympic marketing programmes must be such as those related to goods and services, carefully considered because marketing that have been adopted. The goods and programmes evolve over the course of each services (i.e. the provision of products, Olympiad, and each marketing programme is services and support) figures cited in this subject to different contractual terms and document have generally been accounted for distribution principles. based on contractual values, where available. Please note that commercial agreements The financial figures presented here do not reached with the IOC may be paid in different include any public moneys, including currencies depending on the nature of the donations, provided to the OCOGs, the agreement and the location of the parties. National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the For the purposes of the Marketing Fact File, International Federations of Olympic sports in order to provide comparisons across (IFs), or other governing bodies. agreements/locations, exchange rates have been converted where possible to a single This edition of the Olympic Marketing Fact currency, United States Dollars, based on the File contains the most complete information exchange rate at the time of the agreement. available as of 1 January 2020. Further information on the marketing programmes N.B. The financial figures contained of each Olympic Games are available in in this document are provided for general the IOC’s Marketing Reports (available on information purposes, are estimates www.olympic.org/documents/ioc- and are not intended to represent formal marketing-and-broadcasting). 3 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: CHAPTER 4: OLYMPIC MARKETING OVERVIEW OLYMPIC GAMES TICKETING Fundamental Objectives of Olympic Marketing 5 Olympic Games Ticketing Overview 32 Olympic Marketing Revenue Generation 8 Olympic Games Ticket Sales 33 Olympic Marketing Revenue Distribution 8 IOC Contribution to Support the Olympic Games 9 Olympic Marketing Contributions to the NOCs 10 Olympic Marketing Contributions to the IFs 11 CHAPTER 5: OLYMPIC LICENSING The IOC Global Licensing Strategy 35 CHAPTER 2: Olympic Games Licensing Programmes 36 OLYMPIC PARTNERSHIP Olympic Numismatic Programmes 37 Olympic Philatelic Programmes 37 Olympic Sponsorship Overview 13 Olympic Licensing, Numismatic Worldwide Olympic Partnership 15 and Philatelic History 38 TOP IX Partnership 16 Olympic Games Domestic Sponsorship 19 Olympic Sponsorship History 20 APPENDIX The Olympic Movement CHAPTER 3: and Commercial Partnerships 40 OLYMPIC BROADCASTING IOC Executive Board 41 IOC Marketing Commission 41 Olympic Broadcast Overview 23 IOC Television & Marketing Services SA 42 Olympic Broadcast Partnerships 23 Rio 2016: Basic Facts 42 Olympic Broadcast: Worldwide Coverage 24 PyeongChang 2018: Basic Facts 42 Olympic Broadcast: Global Viewership 25 Tokyo 2020: Basic Facts 42 Olympic Broadcast: Glossary of Terms 25 Beijing 2022: Basic Facts 43 Olympic Broadcast Programming 26 Paris 2024: Basic Facts 43 Olympic Broadcast Revenue Generation 27 Los Angeles 2028: Basic Facts 43 Olympic Broadcasting History 28 Contacts 43 4 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION CHAPTER 1 5 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION CHAPTER 1: OLYMPIC MARKETING OVERVIEW This chapter provides an overview of the fundamental principles of Olympic marketing, as well as facts and figures regarding the generation of Olympic marketing revenue and the distribution of revenue throughout the Olympic Movement. FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVES OF OLYMPIC MARKETING The IOC coordinates Olympic • To ensure that the Olympic Games marketing programmes with the can be experienced by the maximum following objectives: number of people throughout the world principally via broadcast coverage. • To generate revenue to be distributed throughout the entire Olympic Movement • To protect and promote the equity that is – including the OCOGs, the National inherent in the Olympic image and ideals. Olympic Committees (NOCs) and their continental associations, the International • To control and limit the commercialisation Federations (IFs) and other recognised of the Olympic Games. international sports organisations – and to provide financial support for sport • To create and maintain long-term in emerging nations. marketing programmes. • To build on the successful activities • To enlist the support of Olympic developed by each Organising Committee marketing partners in the promotion for the Olympic Games (OCOG) and thereby of the Olympic ideals. eliminate the need to recreate the marketing structure with each Olympic Games. 6 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Where Olympic marketing revenue comes from Managed Managed by the Organising Committees for the Olympic by the IOC Games (OCOGs), under the direction of the IOC In addition, the NOCs and IFs generate revenue through The Olympic Broadcast IOC official their own Domestic Ticketing Licensing Partner (TOP) partnerships supplier and sponsorship within the programme licensing commercial host country programme programmes IOC revenue sources (2013-2016) Where IOC revenues go • IOC activities 73% Broadcast rights to develop sport and 18% TOP programme operations marketing rights of the IOC • NOCs to help them support their athletes at national and local levels 5% Other revenue • IFs to run and promote their sports globally 4% Other • Individual athletes and coaches, via Olympic Solidarity funding rights • The Organising Committee of each Olympic Games • Other Olympic Movement and sport organisations to promote worldwide development of sport • IOC activities, projects and programmes aimed at supporting the staging of the Games and promoting the worldwide development of sport and the Olympic Movement IOC contributions to support the Olympic Solidarity Olympic Winter Games1 21 5 $552m $561m $775m $833m $887m World Continental programmes programmes $509m Available to all NOCs worldwide Olympic Solidarity budget for 2017- In addition to these 2020 (in USD), programmes, which aim to Salt Lake Turin Vancouver Sochi PyeongChang representing the support athletes, coaches, City 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 NOCs’ share of Olympic administrators and promote the broadcasting Olympic values, was an rights assistance programme to help 1The IOC contribution supports the staging of the Summer and Winter editions of the the NOCs participate in the Games. This includes direct contributions to the OCOGs (through the share of the television broadcasting rights and TOP rights), considerable costs that previously had Olympic Winter Games been borne by the OCOG, such as the host broadcast operation, and various forms of PyeongChang 2018 Games support to the OCOG, including through its “Transfer of Knowledge” programmes. The OCOGs also raise additional revenue through domestic commercial activities facilitated by the authorised use of the Olympic marks together with the OCOGs’ symbols. 7 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION Where Olympic marketing revenue comes from 200+ $3.4m 90% The number of Every day the IOC The percentage countries/territories distributes the equivalent of of IOC revenues broadcasting USD 3.4m to help athletes that are distributed coverage of and sports organisations at to the wider PyeongChang 2018 all levels around the world sporting movement 14 7.6% $5.7bn The number of The percentage IOC’s total Worldwide Olympic increase in IOC revenues revenue for Partners in the current from 2009-2012 the 2013-2016 TOP programme to 2013-2016 Olympiad Olympic Solidarity at PyeongChang 2018 268 $11m 13 Athletes from All participating NOCs Teams 60 NOCs supported benefited from the supported 13 57 by Olympic IOC subsidies for by Olympic Scholarships NOCs’ participation Solidarity Medals (6 gold, 3 silver, Diplomas won by competed in in the Olympic Games Scholarships 4 bronze) won by Olympic Olympic Scholarship PyeongChang (totalling USD 11m) from 10 NOCs Scholarship recipients recipients 8 OLYMPIC MARKETING FACT FILE 2020 EDITION OLYMPIC MARKETING REVENUE GENERATION The Olympic Movement generates revenue through their own respective revenue through several programmes. commercial programmes. The IOC manages broadcast partnerships, the TOP worldwide sponsorship The following chart provides details of the programme and the IOC official supplier total revenue generated from broadcast and licensing programme. In addition, partnerships and the TOP programme during the NOCs, OCOGs and IFs generate the past six Olympiads. IOC Revenue from Broadcast and TOP Programme: The Past Six Olympiads* Source 1993-1996 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2008 2009-2012 2013-2016 (in USD millions) Broadcast 1,251 1,845 2,232 2,570 3,850 4,157 TOP Programme
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rescinding a Bid: Stockholm's Uncertain Relationship with The
    Rescinding a bid: Stockholm’s uncertain relationship with the Olympic Games Erik Johan Olson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Geography Robert D. Oliver Luke Juran Korine N. Kolivras February 16, 2018 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: sport mega-events, urban development, Olympic bidding, Agenda 2020, bid failure, urban politics, bid strategy Copyright 2018 Rescinding a bid: Stockholm’s uncertain relationship with the Olympic Games Erik Olson ABSTRACT The City of Stockholm has undergone a curious process of considering whether to launch a bid for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games. That Stockholm has contemplated launching a bid is not surprising from a regional perspective—the Olympic Games have not been held in a Scandinavian country since Lillehammer, Norway played host in 1994 and Sweden has never hosted the Winter Olympics. A potential bid from Stockholm would also be consistent with Sweden’s self-identification and embracement of being a ‘sportive nation’. Failed applications by the Swedish cities of Gothenburg, Falun, and Östersund to host the Winter Olympic Games confirm the long-standing interest of the Swedish Olympic Committee to secure the Games, although it should be noted that the Swedish Olympic Committee did not submit a bid for the 2006, 2010, 2014 or 2018 Winter Olympic Games competitions. Although recent reports indicate that Stockholm will not vie for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games, the notion that the city was even considering the option remains surprising. Stockholm had withdrawn its bid from the 2022 bidding competition citing a variety of concerns including a lack of government and public support, financial uncertainty, as well as the post-event viability of purpose-built infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2024 Olympic Games
    City of Toronto Feasibility study in respect of hosting the 2024 Olympic Games 11 November 2013 City of Toronto Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2024 Olympic Games Contents TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 OLYMPIC BID PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE FOR THE 2024 OLYMPIC GAMES .................................................................................................................................. 33 LESSONS LEARNED ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO POTENTIAL BID .................................................................................................................................. 44 ECONOMIC IMPACT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa
    ASSOCIATION DES COMITES NATIONAUX OLYMPIQUES D’AFRIQUE (A.C.N.O.A.) ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA (A.N.O.C.A.) _________________ 50 EC 12 / 09 50TH MEETING OF THE ANOC EXECUTIVE COUNCIL LAUSANNE, DECEMBER 8, 2009 REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA Submitted by lnt. General Lassana PALENFO President. ADRESSE/ADDRESS: P.M.B. 645 MAITAMA ABUJA-NIGERIA TEL: (234) 98705991 (234) 94136478 FAX: (234) 94136480 Email: [email protected] 2 REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA Mr. President, Distinguished members of the Executive Council, Dear Colleagues, Ladies and Gentlemen, This report covers the period that has elapsed since our last Council meeting held in this same city on June 14, 2009. During the six month intervening period, several events worthy of note marked the activities of our continental association. Foremost among these were inter alia: x 13th ordinary Assembly held in Abuja, Nigeria, host country of the ANOCA Headquarters, x Election of a new ANOCA Executive for Olympiad 2009 – 2012 headed by the incumbent President who brilliantly won a second term of office, x Election of a new Secretary General for the Association, x Laying of the foundation stone of the permanent Headquarters of ANOCA, now under construction courtesy the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, x Inaugural meeting of the new Executive Committee held last September, x 12th World Athletics Championship held in Berlin, Germany in July/August 2009, x XIIIth Olympic Congress held in Copenhagen, Denmark, x Election of two new IOC members in Africa at the 121st IOC session in Copenhagen: Engr.
    [Show full text]
  • 26. 74Th IOC Session in Varna, 1973. Official Silver Badge
    26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 34. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. IOC Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With white ribbon. EF. ($175) 35. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. IOC Commission Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With red‑white‑red ribbon. EF. ($150) 36. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. National Olympic Committee Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With green ribbon. EF. ($150) 37. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. NOC Guest Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With green‑white‑green ribbon. EF. ($150) 38. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. International Federation Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. Spotty VF‑EF, with light blue ribbon. ($100) 39. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. Press Badge. Bronze, 44 45 46 47 48 33x64mm. EF, spot, with dark yellow ribbon. ($150) 26. 74th IOC Session in Varna, 1973. Official Silver Badge. Silvered, 40. 83rd IOC Session Badge in Moscow, 1980. Bronze, 33x64mm. partially enameled, gilt legend, 20x44mm. EF. ($150) With raspberry ribbon. EF. ($150) 27. 77th IOC Session in Innsbruck, 1976. Organizing Committee 41. 11th IOC Congress in Baden-Baden, 1981. IOC Secretariat Badge. Silvered, 35x46mm. With red ribbon, white stripe in center. Badge. Silvered, logo in color, 28x28mm. With white‑red‑white 56 IOC members were present. Lt. wear, abt. EF. Rare. ($575) ribbon. EF. ($200) 28. 22nd Meeting of the IOC and International Federations in 42. 11th IOC Congress in Baden-Baden, 1981. Session Organizing Barcelona, 1976. Television Badge. Gilt, red enamel, 32x50mm. Committee Service Badge. Silvered, logo in color, 27x31mm, with With orange ribbon. EF.
    [Show full text]
  • Gd Editorial
    IOC MA RKETING MEDIA GU IDE BEIJING 2008 IOC MARKETING MEDIA GUIDE / 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction to Olympic Marketing Structure 03 2. Broadcast and Digital media preview 05 3. Benefits of Olympic Partnerships 08 4. The TOP Programme 09 Coca-Cola 10 Atos Origin 12 GE 14 Johnson & Johnson 16 Kodak 18 Lenovo 20 Manulife 22 McDonald’s 24 Omega 26 Panasonic 28 Samsung 30 Visa 32 5. Licensing 35 6. Ticketing 37 7. Protecting the Olympic brand 38 8. Promotional campaign 41 9. Key contacts 43 The financial figures contained in this document are provided for general information purposes, are estimates and are not intended to represent formal accounting reports of the IOC, the Organising Committees for the Olympic Games (OCOGs) or other organisations within the Olympic Movement. For further historical facts and figures, please see the Olympic Marketing Fact File (http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_344.pdf ) IOC MARKETING MEDIA GUIDE / 3 1. INTRODUCTION TO OLYMPIC MARKETING STRUCTURE As an event that commands the focus of the media and the attention of the entire world for two weeks every other year, the Olympic Games are one of the most effective international marketing platforms in the world, reaching billions of people in over 200 countries. Today, marketing partners are an intrinsic part of the Olympic Family and the Olympic marketing programme has become the driving force behind the promotion, financial security and stability of the Olympic Movement. OBJECTIVES The Olympic Movement revenue generation programme is designed to
    [Show full text]
  • Green Olympics
    Green Olympics: intentions and reality Nadezhda Maslova Master of Science Thesis Stockholm 2010 Nadezhda Maslova Green Olympics: intentions and reality Supervisor: Jan Fidler Examiner: Ronald Wennersten Master of Science Thesis STOCKHOLM 2010 PRESENTED AT INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY TRITA-IM 2010:01 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se Abstract The focus of this report is directed to the consideration of the problems related to the difference between commitment of International Olympic Committee to better environmental approach and actual environmental performance of Olympic Games which suppose to follow this commitment since the Games of the year 2002. Mostly qualitative research methodology was utilized in this study. It was based on the interviews with representatives of Greenpeace and World Wildlife Fund, the organizations which are involved in environmental assessment of Olympic Games; exploration of the environmental requirements from International Olympic Committee for carrying out Olympic Games and changes in these requirements through years; evaluation of environmental performance of the past Olympic Games which needed to follow environmental commitment. The research showed that despite continuously improvement in the requirements through years the Host Cities are still managing to fail the preparation of environmental side of the Games. The unsolved problem of still vague requirements was revealed; lack of communication between Non-Government Organizations, which actually give environmental assessment of Olympic Games, and International Olympic Committee was discovered and some political issues were discussed. After the carried work it is recommended to enforce the cooperation between Non-Government Organizations and International Olympic Committee and create common system for evaluation of environmental performance, state more clear requirements for the ecological organization of Olympic Games and change focus from environment to sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • “History” and Other Stories from the Shadow of Sugar Loaf Mountain
    “History” and other stories from the shadow of Sugar Loaf Mountain By Volker Kluge A memorable logo and Rarely have I heard or read the phrase “wrote Olympic torch on a Brazilian history“ so frequently as in the media coverage of the stamp block, franked two and a half weeks in which Olympic Games took on 5th August 2016, place in Rio de Janeiro. On closer inspection it was the day of the opening mostly not about history, but about positive stories with of the Olympic Games. the standardised introduction: “For the first time ...” There were cases of doping, bad behaviour from athletes, wrestling coaches undressing to protest against a verdict, or ungracious judokas refusing to shake hands with their opponent, only extremely rarely let the media write “history”. If one understands history however as an occupation or even science which finding out about the past – and The three dimensional logo is somehow very Brazilian, thus human history – by means of certain sources, then and not just because it made up of the national the flood of material from Rio is considerably reduced. Yet colours of green, blue and yellow. It was chosen after there were some moments which fully deserved to burn a competition between amongst 137 creative agencies. their way into the collective memory. Here is a selection: The idea apparently came to Frederico Gelli the creative director of Tátil Design, whilst he was swimming The Symbol at Ipanema. When he emerged, he is said to have caught sight of the Dois Irmãos (Two Brothers Hill) and At first sight, the logo of the Olympic Games reminded said to himself: “We are in the middle of sculpture me of a baby’s dummy.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 Aug 01.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Home | 2 Business | 13 Sport | 22 PSG handball EU removes Ashes series team discovers two Iranian oil swings in Qatar of the companies from England’s future. its sanctions list. favour again. SATURDAY 1 AUGUST 2015 • 16 Shawwal 1436 • Volume 20 Number 6509 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 QA refutes US Emir meets Malaysian PM in Kuala Lumpur 75pc humidity forecast tonight DOHA: High humidity the country has top 3 carriers’ been experiencing over the past few days is expected to continue today. The Meteorology Department yesterday said humidity level would be as high as 75 per- cent at night and 53 percent in the evening. subsidy claims However, it would increase to 80 percent on Sunday night. Today’s forecast puts the maximum tem- Submits ‘open skies policy’ white paper perature between 43 and 48 degrees Celsius and the minimum between 29 and 31. DOHA: Qatar Airways (QA), that the many of the market In Doha, day temperature is likely to reach in a ‘white paper’ submitted to changes complained of by the 44 degrees and night temperature to 33. the US, has refuted the subsidy Big 3 are not the product of Al Khor would be the coolest today with the allegations against it by the “unfair competition” (or any- day and night mercury levels hovering over 29 ‘Big 3’ US carriers. thing remotely related to sub- and 40 degrees, respectively. The submission comprehen- sidy), but are the by-product of Abu Samra is expected to witness day tem- sively addressed and answered all advances in aircraft technology perature of up to 48 degrees, while the mercury issues raised in the Open Skies and demographic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sochi Winter Olympics
    Official Newsletter of the Olympic Council of Asia Edition 25 - June 2014 Asia at Sochi 2014 OCA HQ hosts IOC President OCA Games Update OCA Media Committee Contents Inside your 32-page Sporting Asia 3 OCA President’s Message OCA mourns Korean ferry tragedy victims Sporting Asia is the official 4 – 8 NEWS DIGEST newsletter of the Olympic Council of Asia, published 4 Hanoi withdraws as Asian Games host in 2019 quarterly. Kuala Lumpur counts down to IOC Session in 2015 OCA Education Committee Chairman passes away 11 Executive Editor / Director General OCA assists with 2nd COC Youth Camp Husain Al Musallam [email protected] 5 China’s Yu Zaiqing returns as IOC Vice President Children of Asia Games recognise OCA input Art Director / IT Director Top IOC posts for Asian sports leaders Amer Elalami [email protected] 6 ANOC Ex-Co and Olympic Solidarity Commission in Kuwait Director, Int’l & NOC Relations Vinod Tiwari 7 IOC President visits Kuwait, Qatar [email protected] and Saudi Arabia Anti-Doping activities Director, Asian Games Department 22 8 Haider A. Farman [email protected] OS/OCA Regional Forums in Bahrain, Myanmar 9 10 Inside the OCA Editor Jeremy Walker OCA Media Committee [email protected] OCA IT Audit in Thailand Executive Secretary 11 – 22 WELCOME TO SOCHI! Nayaf Sraj [email protected] Twelve pages of Asia at the Winter Olympics starts here Olympic Council of Asia PO Box 6706, Hawalli 23 Overview, Facts and Figures, Photo Gallery 12 – 13 Zip Code 32042 Kuwait 14 Four Asian NOCs join medal rush Telephone: +965 22274277 - 88 15 Final medals
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL 2022 Candidature Proc
    2022 CANDIDATURE PROCEDURE AND QUESTIONNAIRE XXIV OLYMPIC WINTER GAMES International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy C.P. 356 CH-1007 Lausanne / Switzerland Tel: (41.21) 621 61 11 Fax: (41.21) 621 62 16 www.olympic.org © IOC JUNE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This document is only available electronically. Please consider the environment before printing. If printing is necessary try to print double-sided. 2022 Candidature Procedure and Questionnaire Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 I. Global Reference Data .................................................................................................................................................. 5 II. Related Documents ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 III. IOC Tools and Information ......................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. Key Themes ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 V. Key Considerations ....................................................................................................................................................10 VI. Olympic Games Impact (OGI) ...................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Arts in the Olympic Games
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the q u alityo f the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission ofof the the copyrightcopyright owner.owner. FurtherFurther reproduction reproduction prohibited prohibited without without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Summer Games Mascots from Munich 1972 to Rio 2016 Reference Document
    Olympic Summer Games Mascots from Munich 1972 to Rio 2016 Reference document 09.02.2017 Olympic Summer Games Mascots from Munich 1972 to Rio 2016 CONTENT Introduction 3 Munich 1972 4 Montreal 1976 6 Moscow 1980 8 Los Angeles 1984 10 Seoul 1988 12 Barcelona 1992 14 Atlanta 1996 16 Sydney 2000 18 Athens 2004 20 Beijing 2008 22 London 2012 24 Rio 2016 26 Credits 28 The Olympic Studies Centre www.olympic.org/studies [email protected] 2 Olympic Summer Games Mascots from Munich 1972 to Rio 2016 INTRODUCTION The word mascot is derived from the Provencal and appeared in French dictionaries at the end of the 19th century. “It caught on following the triumphant performance of Mrs Grizier- Montbazon in an operetta called La Mascotte, set to music by Edmond Audran in 1880. The singer’s success prompted jewellers to produce a bracelet charm representing the artist in the costume pertaining to her role. The jewel was an immediate success. The mascot, which, in its Provencal form, was thought to bring good or bad luck, thus joined the category of lucky charms.” 1 The first Olympic mascot – which was not official – was named “Schuss” and was created for the Olympic Winter Games Grenoble 1968. A little man on skis, half-way between an object and a person, it was the first manifestation of a long line of mascots which would not stop. It was not until the Olympic Summer Games Munich 1972 that the first official Olympic mascot was created. Since then, mascots have become the most popular and memorable ambassadors of the Olympic Games.
    [Show full text]