DOCSLIB.ORG

A: Picornavirales B: Dicistroviruses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A: Picornavirales B: Dicistroviruses A: Picornavirales 0.5 AA subs Thika virus AKH40285 Drosophila uncharacterized virus AKP18620 95|97 Kilifi Virus YP_009140560 Machany Virus (Dobs) KU754504 Unclassified Rosy apple aphid virus ABB89048 Picornavirales 95|86 Acyrthosiphon pisum virus NP_620557 TSA Clavigralla tomentosicollis GAJX01000318 TSA Euschistus heros GBER01001913 B: Dicistroviruses TSA Bactrocera dorsalis GAKP01021200 TSA Ceratitis capitata GAMC01006902 0.5 AA subs TSA Bactrocera latifrons GDHF01000396 TSA Bactrocera cucurbitae GBXI01004087 TSA Fopius arisanus GBYB01002971 98|94 Goose dicistrovirus ALV83314 Empeyrat Virus (Sdef) KU754505 TSA Teleopsis dalmanni GBBP01093735 Sequence from Drosophila kikkawai [SRR346732] Cricket paralysis virus AKA63263 42|37 Nilaparvata lugens C virus AIY53985 Drosophila C Virus NP 044945 TSA Pontastacus leptodactylus GAFS01001458 44|28 Aphid lethal paralysis virus AEH26191 99|97 TSA Medicago sativa GAFF01020061 Rhopalosiphum padi virus ABX74939 TSA Nilaparvata lugens GAYF01148415 Cripavirus TSA Agave tequilana GAHU01086141 Himetobi P virus BAA32553 99|99 TSA Phaseolus vulgaris GAMK01054259 20|54 Black queen cell virus ABS82427 99|100 Triatoma virus AAF00472 Plautia stali intestine virus BAA21898 0.99 Homalodisca coagulata virus-1 ABC55703 92|87 Ancient Northwest Territories cripavirus AIM55450 100|99 TSA Colobanthus quitensis GCIB01076644 Antarctic picorna-like virus 1 AKG93960 30|50 Formica exsecta virus 1 AHB62420 87|37 100|94 Israeli acute paralysis virus AEL12438 Kashmir bee virus AAP32283 Acute bee paralysis virus AF150629 TSA Linepithema humile EZ933808 Solenopsis invicta virus-1 AAU85375 99|99 TSA Conwentzia psociformis GAYH01015373 Aparavirus TSA Menopon gallinae GAWR01012511 TSA Zorotypus caudelli GAYA01006867 65|35 10|57 Taura syndrome virus AFO53688 Macrobrachium rosenbergii Taihu virus AEE02024 94|58 Mud crab dicistrovirus ADR72923 98|47 TSA Procotyla fluviatilis GAKZ01048307 91|57 Laverivirus AHA86926 TSA Schmidtea mediterranea GBEE01003387 TSA Galloisiana yuasai GAWN01024221 96|96 TSA Stigmatomma oregonense GAXR01027179 TSA Metallyticus splendidus GATB01027408 TSA Camptotheca acuminata GACF01095404 98|44 TSA Silene latifolia JO773273 TSA Euroleon nostras GAXW01089633 C: Nodaviruses Drosophila melanogaster American nodavirus ACU32794 100|87 Flock house virus AEQ39075 0.5 AA subs 4|24 99|67 TSA Stigmatomma oregonense GAXR01015452 Black beetle virus CAA26238 Alphanodavirus 0|25 Boolarra virus AF329080 96|76 99|100 Newington Virus (Dimm) KU754529 99|66 Bat nodavirus AGN73379 TSA Bactrocera cucurbitae GBXI01012869 96|100 97|100 TSA Ceratitis capitata GAMC01011587 Covert mortality nodavirus AIL48199 Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus AAO60068 Penaeus vannamei nodavirus ADV74764 98|96 Lutzomyia nodavirus AKP18615 Dicentrarchus labrax betanodavirus AET07013 99|98 Senegalese sole Iberian betanodavirus ACX71271 87|64 75|19 0|13 Epinephelus tauvina nervous necrosis virus AF319555 43|28 Asian seabass Nervous Necrosis Virus AEK48160 86|91 Sevenband grouper nervous necrosis virus AKE78836 Betanodavirus 100|94 Japanese flounder nervous necrosis virus ACN58225 Golden pompano nervous necrosis virus AEK48150 90|90 Barfin flounder virus ACF36168 100|99 Tiger puffer nervous necrosis virus ABY87293 Striped Jack nervous necrosis virus BAB64329 TSA Nilaparvata lugens GANM01015802 81|49 Pariacoto virus AF171942 Alphanodavirus 97|73 Mosinovirus AIO11151 Lunovirus AKA58518 52|50 Fesavirus 4 AII82234 97|77 Tetnovirus 2 ADK97710 69|22 TSA Opisthorchis felineus GBJA01011878 Tetnovirus 1 ADK97708 9|24 Craigies Hill virus (Dmel) AKH40302 62|62 Craigmillar Park Virus (Dsus) KU754525 Bat guano associated nodavirus ADI48250 77|41 Alphanodavirus ADF97523 Alphanodavirus 47|17 Santeuil nodavirus ADW54431 97|99 Orsay virus ADW54428 91|41 Le Blanc nodavirus AFU90716 TSA Panicum hallii JR063831 TSA Aleochara curtula GATW01051453 54|21 Plasmopara halstedii virus A ADK55578 D: Birnaviruses Paralichthys olivaceus birnavirus ABW07822 75|70 Marine birnavirus AAN04574 95|95 Yellowtail ascites virus AAN04570 55|51 Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus ACD14075 Aquabirnavirus 0.5 AA subs 87|68 Victorian trout aquabirnavirus ALF95259 57|60 Tasmanian aquabirnavirus ALF95254 Infectious bursal disease virus ABG91145 Avibirnavirus 100|99 Blotched snakehead virus CAD30691 Blosnavirus Rotifer birnavirus strain Palavas CAX33878 94|83 Tellina virus 1 CAI74982 Espirito Santo virus AEW87520 88|98 Culex Y virus AFR34027 70|64 98|100 Mosquitoe x virus AFU34334 96|98 Culicine-associated Z virus AGW51781 Eridge Virus (Dimm) KU754528 93|88 Entomo- Drosophila X Virus AF196645 birnavirus TSA Eurytemora affinis GBGO01030594 TSA Panonychus ulmi GCAC01001531 Drosophila melanogaster birnavirus ACU32792 E: Rhabdoviruses TSA Oropsylla silantiewi GAWY01012238 93|87 Sanxia Water Strider Virus 5 AJG39120 0.5 AA subs 71|50 Jingshan Fly Virus 2 AJG39108 20|43 Shuangao Bedbug Virus 2 AJG39134 89|87 Drosophila busckii Rhabdovirus KR822813 Lye Green Virus (Dobs) KU754522 Wuhan Mosquito Virus 9 AJG39218 Spodoptera frugiperda rhabdovirus KF947078 56|33 TSA Triodia sylvina GAVB01022634 96|96 Wuhan Ant Virus AJG39155 14|45 TSA Frankliniella occidentalis GAXD01021508 Taastrup virus AY423355 42|37 Di. longicaudata rhabdovirus ALU09129 Unclassified 95|75 Withyham Virus (Dobs) KU754523 Rhabdoviridae Drosophila subobscura Rhabdovirus KR822817 Drosophila sturtvanti Rhabdovirus KR822823 52|63 Shayang Fly Virus 3 AJG39131 Wuhan Fly Virus 3 AJG39162 TSA Musca domestica GBAB01012379 Wuhan House Fly Virus 2 AJG39173 Shuangao Insect Virus 6 AJG39136 99|98 Soybean cyst nematode virus AEF56733 Cherry Gardens Virus (Dsub) KU754524 97|75 Farmington virus YP 009091823 34|52 TSA Humulus lupulus LA363981 Tacheng Tick Virus 7 AJG39148 F: Reoviruses Soudat Virus (Sdef) KU754531 Torrey Pines virus (Dmel) KP714078 18|55 Bombyx mori cypovirus 1 AAK20302 100|99 Lutzomyia reovirus 2 AKP18622 0.5 AA subs 65|75 TSA Helicoverpa armigera GBDM01000458 75|69 TSA Helicoverpa assulta GBTA01063990/91 83|89 Heliothis armigera cypovirus 5 ABV04399 Cypovirus 76|83 Thaumetopoea pityocampa cypovirus 5 AJC97790 Aedes pseudoscutellaris reovirus AAZ94069 53|76 Fako virus AIW39871 Dinovernavirus Antheraea mylitta cypovirus 4 ADH10220 Dendrolimus punctatus cypovirus 22 AIY60598 Inachis io cypovirus 2 AHJ14791 Grape Cabernet Sauvignon reovirus AKB94056 Raspberry latent virus ADO27688 Rice ragged stunt virus AAC36456 Oryzavirus 95|96 Acinopterus angulatus reovirus AFA28393 Spissistilus festinus reovirus AEC32488 Colorado tick fever virus AF133428 Coltireovirus Eyach virus AAM18342 Cryphonectria parasitica mycoreovirus-1 BAS02068 Mycoreovirus Mycoreovirus 3 BAC98431 Bloomfield virus (Dmel) AKH40310 Drosophila reovirus AKP18621 92|68 Grange Virus (Dsub) 7|33 42|54 TSA Delia antiqua GAWI01008154 GAWI01008660 TSA Teleopsis dalmanni GBBP01003533/34 TSA Hypothenemus hampei GDLS01017018 Mal de Rio Cuarto virus AAO73182 98|100 rice black-streaked dwarf virus AEI59023 Fiji disease virus AAK40249 Fijivirus 21|28 Diaphorina citri reovirus BAH28860 93|92 Nilaparvata lugens reovirus BAA08542 Cimodo virus AHF20703 Operophtera brumata reovirus ABB17205 G: Picornavirales 0.5 AA subs Fisavirus 1 AIY32625 94|83 Pow Burn Virus (Dsub) KU754519 TSA Anopheles sinensis GAFE01004028 Unclassified Husavirus ALE31139 97|92 Picornavirales 99|96 Posavirus 1 AKJ83380 Posavirus 3 AKJ83381 Posavirus 2 AER30034 H: Basally-branching Flaviviruses 0.5 AA subs TSA Sitobion avenae aphid GAPL01011202 Macrosiphum euphorbiae virus 1 ALK01984 Shuangao lacewing virus 2 ALL52886 97|91 Shayang fly virus 4 ALL52888 84|41 Eriocheir sinensis Cholera-like Virus AKM16625 38|43 TSA Eriocheir sinensis KA661626 Unclassified Xinzhou spider virus 2 ALL52885 Flaviviridae Soybean cyst nematode virus 5 YP_009028573 73|44 Tacheng tick virus 8 ALL52879 Hermitage Virus (Dimm) KU754511 82|76 TSA Conwentzia psociformis GAYH01026052 Takaungu Virus KU754513 Gentian Kobu-sho-associated virus BAM78286 I: Unclassified viruses cf. Poleroviruses and Sobemoviruses 0.5 AA subs Grom Virus (Dobs) KU754506 93|96 Prestney Burn Virus (Dsub) KU754507 26|31 Motts Mill virus KP714076 Ixodes scapularis associated virus 1 KM048318 95|84 80|54 Ixodes scapularis associated virus 2 KM048319 TSA Exoneura robusta HP930702 99|100 94|81 TSA Osmia cornuta GAGH01013362 95|87 TSA Frieseomelitta varia HP890469 Unclassified, TSA Euprymna scolopes GBHH01001052 cf. Polerovirus TSA Lygus hesperus GBHO01033620 89|83 Sobemovirus, TSA Anthonomus grandis GABY01018235 TSA Xanthostigma xanthostigma GAUI01015619 TSA Nilaparvata lugens GAYF01147345 99|100 81|72 Humaita-Tubiacanga virus KR003801 99|100 TSA Caligus rogercresseyi GAZX01036530 Braid Burn Virus (Dsus) KU754508 La Tartoire Virus (Sdef) KU754509 J: Iflaviruses Thaumetopoea pityocampa iflavirus 1 AJC98140 30|28 Lymantria dispar iflavirus 1 AIF75200 0.5 AA subs 14|31 Bombyx mori iflavirus BAS18834 Antheraea pernyi iflavirus AHI87751 99|97 Heliconius erato iflavirus AHW98099 TSA Spodoptera exigua GARL01030594 Kakugo virus BAD06930 5|37 99|99 Deformed wing virus AHL46850 Iflavirus Varroa destructor virus-1 AAP51418 100|99 Formica exsecta virus 2 AHB62422 99|100 62|66 98|94 TSA Stigmatomma oregonense GAXR01027015 TSA Tetramorium bicarinatum GASM01001722 TSA Mischocyttarus flavitarsis GAXM01039151 Slow bee paralysis virus ABS84820 87|64 Graminella nigrifrons virus 1 AJT58559 Nilaparvata lugens honeydew virus 1 BAN19725 TSA Nilaparvata lugens GANM01013490 Laodelphax striatella honeydew virus 1 AHK05791 Laodelphax striatellus picorna-like virus 2 AIX94679 97|72 Nilaparvata lugens
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Cell Lines to Study Factors Affecting Transmission of Fish Viruses
    Using cell lines to study factors affecting transmission of fish viruses by Phuc Hoang Pham A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 ©Phuc Hoang Pham 2014 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Factors that can influence the transmission of aquatic viruses in fish production facilities and natural environment are the immune defense of host species, the ability of viruses to infect host cells, and the environmental persistence of viruses. In this thesis, fish cell lines were used to study different aspects of these factors. Five viruses were used in this study: viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) from the Rhabdoviridae family; chum salmon reovirus (CSV) from the Reoviridae family; infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) from the Birnaviridae family; and grouper iridovirus (GIV) and frog virus-3 (FV3) from the Iridoviridae family. The first factor affecting the transmission of fish viruses examined in this thesis is the immune defense of host species. In this work, infections of marine VHSV-IVa and freshwater VHSV-IVb were studied in two rainbow trout cell lines, RTgill-W1 from the gill epithelium, and RTS11 from spleen macrophages. RTgill-W1 produced infectious progeny of both VHSV-IVa and -IVb. However, VHSV-IVa was more infectious than IVb toward RTgill-W1: IVa caused cytopathic effects (CPE) at a lower viral titre, elicited CPE earlier, and yielded higher titres.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Action of RTBV and RTSV Proteins Suppress Host RNA Silencing Machinery
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.19.427099; this version posted January 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Coordinated action of RTBV and RTSV proteins suppress host RNA silencing machinery Abhishek Anand1, Malathi Pinninti2, Anita Tripathi1, Satendra Kumar Mangrauthia2 and Neeti Sanan-Mishra1* 1 Plant RNAi Biology Group, International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi-110067 2 Biotechnology Section, ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranangar, Hyderabad- 500030 *Corresponding Author: Neeti Sanan-Mishra E-mail address: [email protected] Author e-mail: Abhishek Anand: [email protected] Malathi Pinninti: [email protected] Anita Tripathi: [email protected] Satendra K. Mangrauthia: [email protected] Abstract RNA silencing is as an adaptive immune response in plants that limits accumulation or spread of invading viruses. Successful virus infection entails countering the RNA silencing for efficient replication and systemic spread in the host. The viruses encode proteins having the ability to suppress or block the host silencing mechanism, resulting in severe pathogenic symptoms and diseases. Tungro virus disease caused by a complex of two viruses provides an excellent system to understand these host and virus interactions during infection. It is known that Rice tungro bacilliform virus (RTBV) is the major determinant of the disease while Rice tungro spherical virus (RTSV) accentuates the symptoms. This study brings to focus the important role of RTBV ORF-IV in Tungro disease manifestation, by acting as both the victim and silencer of the RNA silencing pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Origins of Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Single-Stranded DNA Viruses from Bacterial and Archaeal Plasmids
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11433-0 OPEN Multiple origins of prokaryotic and eukaryotic single-stranded DNA viruses from bacterial and archaeal plasmids Darius Kazlauskas 1, Arvind Varsani 2,3, Eugene V. Koonin 4 & Mart Krupovic 5 Single-stranded (ss) DNA viruses are a major component of the earth virome. In particular, the circular, Rep-encoding ssDNA (CRESS-DNA) viruses show high diversity and abundance 1234567890():,; in various habitats. By combining sequence similarity network and phylogenetic analyses of the replication proteins (Rep) belonging to the HUH endonuclease superfamily, we show that the replication machinery of the CRESS-DNA viruses evolved, on three independent occa- sions, from the Reps of bacterial rolling circle-replicating plasmids. The CRESS-DNA viruses emerged via recombination between such plasmids and cDNA copies of capsid genes of eukaryotic positive-sense RNA viruses. Similarly, the rep genes of prokaryotic DNA viruses appear to have evolved from HUH endonuclease genes of various bacterial and archaeal plasmids. Our findings also suggest that eukaryotic polyomaviruses and papillomaviruses with dsDNA genomes have evolved via parvoviruses from CRESS-DNA viruses. Collectively, our results shed light on the complex evolutionary history of a major class of viruses revealing its polyphyletic origins. 1 Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius 10257, Lithuania. 2 The Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. 3 Structural Biology Research Unit, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Characterization of a Novel Marine Birnavirus Isolated from Asian Seabass in Singapore
    Chen et al. Virology Journal (2019) 16:71 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1174-0 RESEARCH Open Access Detection and characterization of a novel marine birnavirus isolated from Asian seabass in Singapore Jing Chen1†, Xinyu Toh1†, Jasmine Ong1, Yahui Wang1, Xuan-Hui Teo1, Bernett Lee2, Pui-San Wong3, Denyse Khor1, Shin-Min Chong1, Diana Chee1, Alvin Wee1, Yifan Wang1, Mee-Keun Ng1, Boon-Huan Tan3 and Taoqi Huangfu1* Abstract Background: Lates calcarifer, known as seabass in Asia and barramundi in Australia, is a widely farmed species internationally and in Southeast Asia and any disease outbreak will have a great economic impact on the aquaculture industry. Through disease investigation of Asian seabass from a coastal fish farm in 2015 in Singapore, a novel birnavirus named Lates calcarifer Birnavirus (LCBV) was detected and we sought to isolate and characterize the virus through molecular and biochemical methods. Methods: In order to propagate the novel birnavirus LCBV, the virus was inoculated into the Bluegill Fry (BF-2) cell line and similar clinical signs of disease were reproduced in an experimental fish challenge study using the virus isolate. Virus morphology was visualized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Biochemical analysis using chloroform and 5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BUDR) sensitivity assays were employed to characterize the virus. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) was also used to obtain the virus genome for genetic and phylogenetic analyses. Results: The LCBV-infected BF-2 cell line showed cytopathic effects such as rounding and granulation of cells, localized cell death and detachment of cells observed at 3 to 5 days’ post-infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenomic Analysis of the Turkey Gut RNA Virus Community J Michael Day1*, Linda L Ballard2, Mary V Duke2, Brian E Scheffler2, Laszlo Zsak1
    Day et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:313 http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/313 RESEARCH Open Access Metagenomic analysis of the turkey gut RNA virus community J Michael Day1*, Linda L Ballard2, Mary V Duke2, Brian E Scheffler2, Laszlo Zsak1 Abstract Viral enteric disease is an ongoing economic burden to poultry producers worldwide, and despite considerable research, no single virus has emerged as a likely causative agent and target for prevention and control efforts. Historically, electron microscopy has been used to identify suspect viruses, with many small, round viruses eluding classification based solely on morphology. National and regional surveys using molecular diagnostics have revealed that suspect viruses continuously circulate in United States poultry, with many viruses appearing concomitantly and in healthy birds. High-throughput nucleic acid pyrosequencing is a powerful diagnostic technology capable of determining the full genomic repertoire present in a complex environmental sample. We utilized the Roche/454 Life Sciences GS-FLX platform to compile an RNA virus metagenome from turkey flocks experiencing enteric dis- ease. This approach yielded numerous sequences homologous to viruses in the BLAST nr protein database, many of which have not been described in turkeys. Our analysis of this turkey gut RNA metagenome focuses in particular on the turkey-origin members of the Picornavirales, the Caliciviridae, and the turkey Picobirnaviruses. Introduction remains elusive, and many enteric viruses can be Enteric disease syndromes such as Poult Enteritis Com- detected in otherwise healthy turkey and chicken flocks plex (PEC) in young turkeys and Runting-Stunting Syn- [3,4]. Regional and national enteric virus surveys have drome (RSS) in chickens are a continual economic revealed the ongoing presence of avian reoviruses, rota- burden for poultry producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Mining Cdnas Reveals Three New Single Stranded RNA Viruses in Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)
    Insect Molecular Biology Insect Molecular Biology (2010), 19 (Suppl. 1), 99–107 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00934.x Data mining cDNAs reveals three new single stranded RNA viruses in Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) D. C. S. G. Oliveira*, W. B. Hunter†, J. Ng*, Small viruses with a positive-sense single-stranded C. A. Desjardins*, P. M. Dang‡ and J. H. Werren* RNA (ssRNA) genome, and no DNA stage, are known as *Department of Biology, University of Rochester, picornaviruses (infecting vertebrates) or picorna-like Rochester, NY, USA; †United States Department of viruses (infecting non-vertebrates). Recently, the order Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, US Picornavirales was formally characterized to include most, Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA; but not all, ssRNA viruses (Le Gall et al., 2008). Among and ‡United States Department of Agriculture, other typical characteristics – e.g. a small icosahedral Agricultural Research Service, NPRU, Dawson, GA, capsid with a pseudo-T = 3 symmetry and a 7–12 kb USA genome made of one or two RNA segments – the Picor- navirales genome encodes a polyprotein with a replication Abstractimb_934 99..108 module that includes a helicase, a protease, and an RNA- dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), in this order (see Le We report three novel small RNA viruses uncovered Gall et al., 2008 for details). Pathogenicity of the infections from cDNA libraries from parasitoid wasps in the can vary broadly from devastating epidemics to appar- genus Nasonia. The genome of this kind of virus ently persistent commensal infections. Several human Ј is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA with a 3 diseases, from hepatitis A to the common cold (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Nora Virus at 2.7 Å Resolution and Implications for Receptor Binding, Capsid Stability and Taxonomy
    This document is downloaded from the VTT’s Research Information Portal https://cris.vtt.fi VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Structure of Nora virus at 2.7 Å resolution and implications for receptor binding, capsid stability and taxonomy Laurinmäki, Pasi; Shakeel, Shabih; Ekström, Jens Ola; Mohammadi, Pezhman; Hultmark, Dan; Butcher, Sarah J. Published in: Scientific Reports DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76613-1 Published: 01/12/2020 Document Version Publisher's final version License CC BY Link to publication Please cite the original version: Laurinmäki, P., Shakeel, S., Ekström, J. O., Mohammadi, P., Hultmark, D., & Butcher, S. J. (2020). Structure of Nora virus at 2.7 Å resolution and implications for receptor binding, capsid stability and taxonomy. Scientific Reports, 10(1), [19675]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76613-1 VTT By using VTT’s Research Information Portal you are bound by the http://www.vtt.fi following Terms & Conditions. P.O. box 1000FI-02044 VTT I have read and I understand the following statement: Finland This document is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of this document is not permitted, except duplication for research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered for sale. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Structure of Nora virus at 2.7 Å resolution and implications for receptor binding, capsid stability and taxonomy Pasi Laurinmäki 1,2,7, Shabih Shakeel 1,2,5,7, Jens‑Ola Ekström3,4,7, Pezhman Mohammadi 1,6, Dan Hultmark 3,4 & Sarah J.
    [Show full text]
  • Classificação Viral
    Classificação Viral Microbiologia As primeiras classificações virais se baseavam na capacidade dos vírus de cau- sar infecções e doenças, baseando-se em suas propriedades patogênicas co- muns, tropismo celular dos vírus e características ecológicas de transmissão. Classificação antiga: • Dermatotrópicos: causam doença de pele • Respiratórios: causam doenças do sistema respiratório • Entéricos: causadores de diarréia • Etc A medida em que se ampliou o conhecimento sobre os vírus, principalmente por meio da microscopia eletrônica, essa classificação tornou-se inadequada. A possibilidade de se visualizar características morfológicas dessas partículas, bem como a identificação de sua composição química por meio de técnicas de biologia molecular, permitiu novos critérios de classificação. A criação do comitê internacional de nomenclatura dos vírus em 1966 padroni- zou a classificação e taxonomia viral, com relatórios periódicos. Os atuais crité- rios mais importantes para a classificação dos vírus são: • Hospedeiro • Morfologia da partícula viral • Tipo de ácido nucléico Outros critérios são: tamanho da partícula viral, características físico-químicas, proteínas virais, sintomas da doença, antigenicidade, entre outros. Na taxonomia viral, as famílias e gêneros são definidos monoteticamente, ou seja, todos os membros dessa classe devem apresentar uma ou mais propriedades que são necessárias e suficientes para ser membro daquela classe. As espécies são poliéticas, ou seja, apresentam algumas características em comum (em ge- ral de uma a cinco),
    [Show full text]
  • A STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE (S.L.T.) STUDY PROJECT to CONTROL MEDFLY in a SOUTHERN REGION of ITALY
    ENTE PER LE NUOVE TECNOLOGIE, ISSN/1120-5571 L’ENERGIA E L’AMBIENTE Dipartimento Innovazione OSTI A STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE (S.l.T.) STUDY PROJECT TO CONTROL MEDFLY IN A SOUTHERN REGION OF ITALY A. TATA, U. CIRIO, R. BALDUCCI ENEA - Dipartimento Innovazione Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Roma STRIBUTON OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNUWKE FOREIGN SALES PROHIBITED V>T Work presented at the “First International Symposium on Nuclear and related techniques in Agriculture, Industry, Health and Environment (NURT1997) October, 28-30, 1997 - La Habana, Cuba RT/1NN/97/28 ENTE PER LE NUOVE TECNOLOGIE, L'ENERGIA E L'AMBIENTE Dipartimento Innovazione A STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE (S.I.T.) STUDY PROJECT TO CONTROL MEDFLY IN A SOUTHERN REGION OF ITALY A. TATA, U. CIRIO, R. BALDUCCI ENEA - Dipartimento Innovazione Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Roma Work presented at the “First International Symposium onNuclear and related techniques in Agriculture, Industry, Health and Environment (NURT1997) October, 28-30, 1997 - La Habana, Cuba RT/INN/97/28 Testo pervenuto net dicembre 1997 I contenuti tecnico-scientifici del rapporti tecnici dell'ENEA rispecchiano I'opinione degli autori e non necessariamente quella dell'Ente. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. SUMMARY A Sterile Insect Technique (S.I. T.) Study Project to control Medflyin a Southern region of Italy Since 1967 ENEA, namely the main Italian governmental technological research organization, is carrying out R&D programmes and demonstrative projects aimed to set up S.I.T. (Sterile Insect Technique) processes. In the framework of a world-wide growing interest concerning pest control technology, ENEA developed a very large industrial project aimed to control Medfly (Ceratitis capitata Wied.) with reference to fruit crops situation in Sicily region (southern of Italy), through the production and spreading of over 250 million sterile flies per week.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)
    Viruses and virus diseases of Poaceae (Gramineae) Viruses The Poaceae are one of the most important plant families in terms of the number of species, worldwide distribution, ecosystems and as ingredients of human and animal food. It is not surprising that they support many parasites including and more than 100 severely pathogenic virus species, of which new ones are being virus diseases regularly described. This book results from the contributions of 150 well-known specialists and presents of for the first time an in-depth look at all the viruses (including the retrotransposons) Poaceae(Gramineae) infesting one plant family. Ta xonomic and agronomic descriptions of the Poaceae are presented, followed by data on molecular and biological characteristics of the viruses and descriptions up to species level. Virus diseases of field grasses (barley, maize, rice, rye, sorghum, sugarcane, triticale and wheats), forage, ornamental, aromatic, wild and lawn Gramineae are largely described and illustrated (32 colour plates). A detailed index Sciences de la vie e) of viruses and taxonomic lists will help readers in their search for information. Foreworded by Marc Van Regenmortel, this book is essential for anyone with an interest in plant pathology especially plant virology, entomology, breeding minea and forecasting. Agronomists will also find this book invaluable. ra The book was coordinated by Hervé Lapierre, previously a researcher at the Institut H. Lapierre, P.-A. Signoret, editors National de la Recherche Agronomique (Versailles-France) and Pierre A. Signoret emeritus eae (G professor and formerly head of the plant pathology department at Ecole Nationale Supérieure ac Agronomique (Montpellier-France). Both have worked from the late 1960’s on virus diseases Po of Poaceae .
    [Show full text]
  • Virus Prospecting in Crickets—Discovery and Strain Divergence of a Novel Iflavirus in Wild and Cultivated Acheta Domesticus
    viruses Article Virus Prospecting in Crickets—Discovery and Strain Divergence of a Novel Iflavirus in Wild and Cultivated Acheta domesticus Joachim R. de Miranda 1,* , Fredrik Granberg 2 , Piero Onorati 1, Anna Jansson 3 and Åsa Berggren 1 1 Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (P.O.); [email protected] (Å.B.) 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] 3 Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-18-672437 Abstract: Orthopteran insects have high reproductive rates leading to boom-bust population dy- namics with high local densities that are ideal for short, episodic disease epidemics. Viruses are particularly well suited for such host population dynamics, due to their supreme ability to adapt to changing transmission criteria. However, very little is known about the viruses of Orthopteran insects. Since Orthopterans are increasingly reared commercially, for animal feed and human consumption, there is a risk that viruses naturally associated with these insects can adapt to commercial rearing conditions, and cause disease. We therefore explored the virome of the house cricket Acheta domesti- cus, which is both part of the natural Swedish landscape and reared commercially for the pet feed market. Only 1% of the faecal RNA and DNA from wild-caught A. domesticus consisted of viruses. Citation: de Miranda, J.R.; Granberg, These included both known and novel viruses associated with crickets/insects, their bacterial-fungal F.; Onorati, P.; Jansson, A.; Berggren, Å.
    [Show full text]
  • THE USE of IONIZING RADIATION to IMPROVE REGIONAL FRUIT PRODUCTION and EXPORTS THROUGH MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY PEST CONTROL Pedro A
    PANEL ON THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES FOR AGRICULTURE, FOOD SECURITY AND HEALTH. IAEA THE USE OF IONIZING RADIATION TO IMPROVE REGIONAL FRUIT PRODUCTION AND EXPORTS THROUGH MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY PEST CONTROL Pedro A. Rendón VIENNA, AUGUST, 21st - 2018 INSECT INFESTATIONS – ARTHROPOD INVASIONS INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND GLOBAL WARMING. Are two main phenomena leading increased frequency of introductions of the costliest insect invaders (1). RISING HUMAN POPULATIONS, movement, migration, wealth and international trade, favor Invasions expansions (1). CLIMATE CHANGE PROJECTIONS TO 2050 predict an average increase of 18% in the area of occurrence of current arthropod invaders (1). INVASIVE INSECTS COST A MINIMUM OF US$70.0 BILLION/YEAR globally for goods and services (1). Insect Infestations are a reality and a concern! FRUIT FLY INTRODUCTIONS IN THE AMERICAS Olive Fruit Fly California, 1998 Caribbean Fruit Fly Florida, 1965 Mediterranean fruit Fly DR, 2015 Mediterranean fruit Fly Carambola Fruit Fly Costa Rica, 1955, GT, 1975 Surinam, 1975 Efforts have been made to stop the spread of the pest and avoid Mediterranean Fruit Fly production and market losses of the Brazil, 1901; Peru, 1956 CHILE, countries involved, by forming a tri- 1963. national commission U.S., MEXICO AND GUATEMALA, the REGIONAL PROGRAMA MOSCAMED to stop the northward movement of the pest. The ‘triple burden’ of malnutrition The WHO is promoting fresh fruit / vegetable Overweight consumption; the Under and obesity demand is nutrition growing. 400 – 600 grams of fruit & vegetables/day. Micronutrient deficiencies USE OF IONIZING RADIATION FOR PEST CONTROL *Photo from (2) Ionizing radiation and the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) have been used since then for pest control and has allowed successful eradication efforts NEW WORLD SCREWWORM (Cochliomyia hominovorax, Coquerel) eradicated from the United States, Mexico, Central America and Libya.
    [Show full text]