Report to the Board of Education October 11, 2017 z

2016-17 California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance and Local Measures z 2016-17 CAASPP System

English Arts/ and •Smarter Balanced Mathematics Summative •California Alternate Assessment Assessments

Grade 5 & 8 • California Standards Test Science • California Alternate Assessment z Smarter Balanced Assessment English Language Arts

Speaking Research and and Listening Inquiry z Smarter Balanced Assessment Math

Problem Solving Concepts and Communicating and Data Procedures Reasoning Analysis z Achievement Level Descriptors

Standard Exceeded

Standard Met Demonstrates Standard Nearly Met advanced progress Standard Not Demonstrates Met progress toward May require toward mastery. further mastery. Needs development substantial for success in improvement future for success in coursework. future coursework. z CAASPP Grades 3-6 Percent of Students who Met Standards

English Language Arts 100 90 80 70 63 60 54 50 46 40 30 20 10 0 CVESD County State Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z CAASPP Grades 3-6 All Student Comparison: ELA

100 90 80 70 62 63 60 55 50 50 50 51 50 43 42 40 28 31 30 20 14 17 16 16 10 0 All Students Socioeconomically Students with English Learners Foster Youth Disadvantaged Disabilities w/ RFEP 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z CAASPP Grades 3-6 Percent of Students who Met Standards Math

100 90 80 70 60 51 46 50 39 40 30 20 10 0 CVESD County State Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z CAASPP Grades 3-6 All Student Comparison: Math

100 90 80 70 60 49 51 50 44 38 39 40 37 37 31 32 32 30 20 15 16 11 12 11 10 0 All Students Socioeconomically Students with English Learners Foster Youth Disadvantaged Disabilities w/ RFEP 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z CAASPP Local Districts - ELA

100

90 80 71 70 63 60 54 50 42 40 34 34 30

20

10

0 CVESD 3-6 Coronado 3-6 National 3-6 San Ysidro 3-6 SD Unified 3-6 South Bay 3-6

Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z A Closer Look at CVESD and Coronado ELA

100 90 80 80 78 77 77 80 75 74 73 68 72 72 71 71 70 69 69 68 70 67 67 67 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Percent of Students Who Met Standards z CAASPP Local Districts -Math

100

90

80 70 65 60 51 50 50 40 31 30 27 27

20

10

0 CVESD 3-6 Coronado 3-6 National 3-6 San Ysidro 3-6 SD Unified 3-6 South Bay 3-6

Percent of Students Who Met & Exceeded Standards z A Closer Look at CVESD and Coronado Math

100 90 76 80 69 70 64 65 65 65 65 64 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Silver Village Veterans Wolf Liberty Arroyo Marshall Salt Creek Strand Canyon Vista Percent of Students Who Met Standards z CVESD and SBAC States ELA

100 90 80 70 63 55 57 56 60 54 50 50 51 50 49 51 50 46 46 47 40 30 20 10 0

Average of Students Who Met Standards z CVESD and SBAC States Math

100 90 80 70 60 52 51 48 47 46 45 50 47 45 50 39 43 38 42 39 40 30 20 10 0

Average of Students Who Met Standards Five-by-Five zPlacement Report z Five-by-Five Placement Report

CHANGE STATUS z z Science

California Science Test California Alternate Assessment for Science z California Science Test California Alternate Assessment for Science Rollout Plan

Year California Science Test 2016-17 Pilot Test 2017-18 Field Test 2018-19 Operational Test 2019-20 Operational Test

Year California Alternate Assessment for Science 2016-17 Pilot Test 2017-18 Pilot Test 2018-19 Field Test 2019-20 Operational Test Local Measures z Local Measures Writing Grades K-2

100

90

80 70 62 63 60 54 50

40

30

20

10

0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Percent of Students Who Met Standards z Local Measures Math Grades K-2

100 90 79 79 80 75 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Percent of Students Who Met Standards z Local Measures Reading Grades K-1

100

90 80 70 71 72 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Percent of Students Who Met Standards z Local Measures Reading Grades 2-6

100 90 80 70 60 49 50 43 40 36 30 20 10 0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Percent of Students at College and Career Readiness Levels z

Moving Forward CVESD Instructional Focus

The CVESD community will work collaboratively to ensure that ALL students, including English Learners, Students with Disabilities, and designated target groups, show measurable growth, which will lead to reducing the achievement gap in literacy and mathematics. This will occur through the implementation of aligned to the California State Standards, and driven by the District’s LCAP goals. z Professional Development Highlights

•TEACHERS •PARENTS •Collaboration •Parent Academy •During School •Parent Nights •After School •DAC/DELAC Meetings •Summer PD Building Collaborative Relationships Conversations & Discussions

Visible Learning ELPAC

Benchmark ELA Dr. Duncan- & ELD Andrade

NGSS & Math Equity & Access

•RESOURCE TEACHERS •PRINCIPALS •RT Trainings •Leadership Meetings •Staff Development •Cohort & ILT Sessions Linda Darling-Hammond

Stanford Graduate School of Education z Innovative Thinkers

Socially Confident Responsible Our Shared Vision

Lifelong High Love of Achieving Learning

Report to the Board of Education October 11, 2017 z

2016 -17 California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance and Local Measures Special Education Progress on Goals REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OCTOBER 11, 2017 Goals

Review Write Meet with Data Guidelines Sites

Customer Monitor IEPs Service Calls

Reduce due process filings and costs. COMPLIANCE CUSTOMER SERVICE

Assess Appropriately Match Needs to Services Communicate Ensure Staff Participation Ensure Meaningful Parent Participation Listen Be Realistic in Scheduling When There’s No Progress, Take Action Provide Good Customer Service Provide Prior Written Notice Goals

Review Write Meet with Data Guidelines Sites

1. Compliance and Customer Services Review 2. Settlement Debriefings Customer Monitor IEPs Service Calls

Reduce due process filings and costs. Goals

Review Write Meet with Data Guidelines Sites

Customer Monitor IEPs Service Calls

Reduce due process filings and costs. 61% Parents contacted 94% Parents happy 93% All areas of need addressed 31% Met 55% Partial Progress 13% Not Met

Goals

Review Write Meet with Data Guidelines Sites

Customer Monitor IEPs Service Calls

Reduce due process filings and costs. Goals

DASHBOARD Very High INFORMED PROFESSIONAL High DEVELOPMENT

Medium

Low

Very Low Improve student achievement.

Additional Action Steps

1. Create Action Steps Based on Morale Survey

2. Meet Regularly with CVE President

3. Utilize Lead SLP to Manage Caselaods and Support SLPs

4. Identify Additional Benchmark Support Materials for MM SDC

5. Continue to Monitor and Evaluate Goalbook

6. Monitor Suggestions from Customer Service Calls Questions?

REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OCTOBER 11, 2017 2016-2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress

Presentation to the Chula Vista Elementary School District Board of Education October 11, 2017 ELA/Mathematics Comparison English Language Learner Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities CAASPP ELA

52%

50%

Percent of Students Who Met or Students of Who Percent Exceeded Expectations Exceeded 41% 41% 38% 37% 33%

30% 30% 32% 27%

13% CAASPP Mathematics

36%

Percent Percent of 32% 32% Exceeded Expectatons Exceeded

25% 25% 25% Students Who or Who Students Met

21% 22% 18% 17% 15% 16% CAASPP Local Control and Accountability Plan Goal One

Schoolwide and all groups of students will show measurable progress toward mastery of California state content standards, including the Common Core State Standards, as adopted by the State Board of Education applicable to charter schools.

Measurable Outcome: ● At least 5% increase in CAASPP ELA and Math results. ● At least 70% of all students will be at expected DRA level. Response to Intervention

● We have developed a clearly structured Response to Intervention model that outlines student supports provided at levels 1, 2, and 3.

● Our clearly structured Response to Intervention program allows students to receive 1-1/2 hours of reading intervention in small groups guided by Instructional Assistants trained in specific (SIPPS and Reading Plus) techniques.

● Long-Term English Learners are given a thirty-minute structured word inquiry lesson after school with the English language development coordinator. This intervention gives our students an added two hours of inquiry which we believe will have a positive effect on our students ability to comprehend what they read. Questions CVESD Board Presentation

Howard Gardner Community School Wednesday, October 11, 2017 Introduction  Established in Fall 2012 as a directly-funded Charter School in Chula Vista that focuses on Howard Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences  Enrollment: 215  Grades served: TK-8th  Demographics:  54% English Learners  12% Students with Disabilities  88% Free/Reduced Lunch  12.3% Homeless Youth  Race/Ethnicity (87% Hispanic, 5% African-American, 5% White, 1% Filipino, 1% American Indian, & 1% Two or more races) Mission

Howard Gardner Community School will provide students with a unique, and supportive learning environment based on the tenets of multiple intelligence theory, facilitate the development of 21st century skills, and create an atmosphere where ALL students reach their highest potential. Assessment Results 2016-2017 CAASPP Results (Overall) CAASPP ELA (Grade/Subgroup) CAASPP Mathematics (Grade/Subgroup) Developmental Reading Assessment (TK-2) Physical Fitness Test (PFT) Physical Fitness Data Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP)

2017-2018 LCAP Goals

Goal #1

Use multiple forms of student/school wide data including assessments to inform instructional decisions, implementation of research-based intervention programs; and fully implement the RTI/SST Program in order to identify and provide appropriate academic and social-emotional supports that will ensure student academic success and close the achievement gap among all subgroups.

Goal #2

Develop a comprehensive, coherently focused, school wide Professional Development Plan that includes standards-aligned content and performance standards (CCSS ELA/ELD/Math & NGSS), academic rigor and research-based pedagogical strategies in order to provide high quality instruction that meets the diverse learning needs (ELL, SPED, SED) of our students, and close the achievement gap, in order to ensure students are College and Career Ready (CCR).

Goal #3

Engage parents as partners through education, communication, and collaboration, to ensure all students are college and career ready. A Culture of High Expectations is consistently implemented throughout the school and supported by providing students with a safe, welcoming and inclusive, positive learning environment. LCAP Highlights

 Use formative and summative assessment data (MAP, CAASPP, DRA, etc.) to drive instruction in the classroom (Goal #1).

 Academic Interventions (Goal #1)  Online/Web-based intervention programs (i.e. RAZ Kids, Read Naturally, Lexia, Zearn (Math), Khan Academy, Zingy Learning (Science), Ten Marks)  After school tutoring (i.e., EL reading groups, homework help, SBAC, and SIPPS program)

 Provide more professional learning opportunities for staff (Goal #2)  ELD/SPED  Instructional strategies  CCSS/NGSS  Social-Emotional  Data Collection/Analysis

 Observations and PLC collaboration time (Goal #2)  Continuous Feedback  Formal/Informal & Peer observations  Vertical and Horizontal planning  Discussion of data-driven instructional practices LCAP Highlights (continued)

 Curriculum  Engage NY ELA (Grades 3-8)  Eureka Math (All Grades)  Reading Street (Pearson)  Lucy Calkins Reading and Writing  Literacy Links (UROK institute)  Letters alive Plus (Alive studios)  Web-based programs

 ELD Program  Shift from CELDT to ELPAC  Use of ELD curriculum and supplemental materials to ensure that EL students receive appropriate, adequate and targeted ELD designated and integrated instruction  Review and closely monitor academic progress of all EL students using multiple forms of data from assessments to ensure academic growth in ELA and Math Additional Supports (Goal #2)  Student Engagement  Associated Student Body (ASB)  School Events (i.e. Holiday show, Talent show, Fall Festival)  Access to technology => 1:1 Student to Chrome book Ratio  Field trips  Middle School Sports (SUHSD)  FitKids America  Social-Emotional  Social Groups  Thrively (online student strengths assessment)  School Psychologist provides one-on-one counseling services Additional Supports (Goal #2 continued)

 Electives  Hip Hop/Folklorico Dance  Yoga  Robotics & Coding  Visual & Performing Arts  Yearbook/Journalism  Chess  Cheerleading  Sports Parent/Community Involvement (Goal #3)

 Parent Meetings  Parent Advisory Committee (PAC)  Coffee with the Director  SSC/ELAC

 Volunteer Opportunities  Classroom Parent(s)  School Events (i.e. Fall Festival, Day of the Child, Starlight Parade)

 Wednesday Assemblies  Awards  Workshops (i.e. Anti-bullying, Jump Rope for Heart)

 Fundraisers  6th grade camp  8th grade field trip  Classroom field trips/supplies  Sports We are…. Multiple Intelligences in action at HGCS! Bodily-Kinesthetic “Body Smart” Logical-Mathematical “Logic Smart” Linguistic “Word Smart” Intrapersonal “Self Smart” Interpersonal “People Smart” Visual-Spatial “Picture Smart” Musical “Music Smart” Naturalistic “Nature Smart” Thank you from all of us at HGCS! October 11, 2017

Chula Vista Elementary School District General Obligation Bond Election Analysis

Prepared by:

650 California Street, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94108 415/956-1030 www.dalescott.com Chula Vista ESD: Assessed Valuation

Strong District AV Growth

Assessed Valuation: 2006 to Date

FY ending (billions) % change

2006 $21.213 2007 $24.342 14.8% 2008 $27.568 13.3% 2009 $28.033 1.7% 2010 $25.043 -10.7% 2011 $24.138 -3.6%

billions 2012 $24.102 -0.1% 2013 $23.932 -0.7% 2014 $24.726 3.3% 2015 $26.356 6.6% 2016 $27.907 5.9% 2017 $29.399 5.3% 2018 $30.479 3.7% 5-Year Average 5.0% 10-Year Average 1.1%

2 2 Chula Vista ESD: 1998 Tax Rates

Final Repayment of 1998 Bonds Provides Opportunity for Tax Rate Extension

* Assumes AV growth rate of 3.0% per year ** SFID residents will pay additional tax rate of approximately $27/$100,000 AV through 2041 for the 2012 Measure E Bonds

3 3 Chula Vista ESD: 2018 Tax Rate Extension

$134 Million Tax Rate Extension on November 2018 Ballot

* Assumes AV growth rate of 3.0% per year ** SFID residents will pay additional tax rate of approximately $27/$100,000 AV through 2041 for the 2012 Measure E Bonds

4 4 Chula Vista ESD: 2018 Tax Rate Extension Alternative #1

Projected Debt Service at $20 TRX

Alternative A: The Bonds

Year Principal Interest Total Project Funds

County tax levy for repayment of BAN/Interest 2019 BAN $30,000,000 $2,400,000 $32,400,000 $30,000,000

Ser A (2023) $70,035,000 $64,494,874 $134,529,874 $40,035,000

Ser B (2026) $33,575,000 $31,848,214 $65,423,214 $33,575,000

Ser C (2028) $30,645,000 $20,703,943 $51,348,943 $30,645,000

Total $134,255,000 $119,447,031 $253,702,031 $134,255,000 millions

*Assumes 3.00% AV growth, 2.00% interest rate for BAN and 5.00% for Series A, B, and C Bond Anticipation Note (BAN)

5 5 Chula Vista ESD: 2018 Tax Rate Extension Alternative #2

Projected Debt Service at $20 TRX

Alternative B: Hybrid G.O. Flex-Bonds ® Project Year Principal Interest Total Funds 2019 BAN $30,000,000 $2,400,000 $32,400,000 $30,000,000 Ser A (2023) $57,940,000 $40,961,247 $98,901,247 $27,940,000 Ser B (2027) $11,975,000 $652,312 $12,627,312 $11,975,000 Ser C (2030) $15,150,000 $768,865 $15,918,865 $15,150,000 Ser D (2033) $15,815,000 $800,822 $16,615,822 $15,815,000 Ser E (2036) $16,425,000 $829,592 $17,254,592 $16,425,000 millions Ser F (2039) $16,950,000 $855,420 $17,805,420 $16,950,000 $134,255,00 Total $134,255,000 $47,268,258 $181,523,258 0

*Assumes 3.00% AV growth, 2.00% interest rate for BAN, 5.00% for Ser A, and 2.50% for all other series

6 6 Chula Vista ESD: Voter Analysis

151,083 Registered Voters in the District

7 7 Chula Vista ESD: Next Steps

Tax Rate Extension Timeline

Action Nov ’18 Ballot

Review Project List Immediately

Finalize project list and bond sizing April ’18

Draft ballot language and legal documents May ’18

Board action to place bond on ballot June ’18

Election Day November 6, 2018

8 8