From: John Crew To: John Hamasaki; Petra DeJesus; Elias, Cindy (POL);
[email protected]; Taylor, Damali A. Cc: Henderson, Paul (DPA); SFPD, Commission (POL); SFPD, Chief (POL); Mark Schlosberg; Breed, Mayor London (MYR);
[email protected] Subject: Early Intervention System -- Item 2.a. (Chief"s Report), Meeting of July 8th Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 2:31:56 PM This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Commissioners: The most important questions that should be publicly answered as you start to pursue Mayor Breed's promise to improve the Early Intervention System (EIS) are: Why will you succeed when so many well-intentioned, smart, diligent people before you have failed? What specifically will you do differently to ensure the commitments being made about EIS -- yet again -- are actually fulfilled this time? My idea is at the end of this email but maybe you have a better one. We're now on our third mayor over a 14-year time span who has promised to fix and strengthen SPFD's EIS. Seven SFPD police chiefs and countless police commissioners before you have allowed a variety of important, clear obligations in your EIS DGOs -- the current one and the prior version of 3.19 -- to be ignored year after year. What specifically will you do to actually hold yourselves and the SFPD command staff accountable to EIS obligations and promises in ways your predecessors have not? The 4th Quarter 2019 EIS data shows -- as the EIS data has shown for years now -- that the SFPD knows exactly who the outlier officers are who use force far more frequently than their peers.