DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Force Quarterly Inside Issue 66, 3Rd Quarter 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Force Quarterly Inside Issue 66, 3Rd Quarter 2012 Issue 66, 3rd Quarter 2012 Achieving Force Resilience Offensive Cyber Joint System Assessments JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Inside Issue 66, 3rd Quarter 2012 Editor Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. JFQ Dialogue Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Supervisory Editor George C. Maerz From the Chairman 2 Production Supervisor Martin J. Peters, Jr. Developing Joint Force Officer-Enlisted Leadership Senior Copy Editor Calvin B. Kelley 4 Capacity for the 21st Century Visual Design Editor Tara J. Parekh By Curtis L. Brownhill Copy Editor/Office Manager John J. Church, D.M.A Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Forum Director, NDU Press, Frank G. Hoffman Design Jeremy Swanston, John Mitrione, Executive Summary 6 U.S. Government Printing Office Deterrence and Escalation in Cross-domain Operations: Printed in St. Louis, Missouri 8 by Where Do Space and Cyberspace Fit? By Vincent Manzo 15 Shadow Boxing: Cyber Warfare and Strategic Economic Attack By Soren Olson NDU Press is the National Defense University’s cross-component, professional military and 22 Offensive Cyber for the Joint Force Commander: It’s Not That Different academic publishing house. It publishes books, By Rosemary M. Carter, Brent Feick, and Roy C. Undersander journals, policy briefs, occasional papers, monographs, and special reports on national security strategy, defense policy, interagency Special Feature cooperation, national military strategy, regional security affairs, and global strategic problems. 28 Resilience: The Result of a Totally Fit Force By Rhonda Cornum, Thomas D. Vail, and Paul B. Lester This is the official U.S. Department of Defense Spiritual Fitness: A Key Component of Total Force Fitness edition of JFQ. Any copyrighted portions of this 35 journal may not be reproduced or extracted without By Patrick J. Sweeney, Jeffrey E. Rhodes, and Bruce Boling permission of the copyright proprietors. Joint Force Quarterly should be acknowledged whenever Commentary material is quoted from or based on its content. 42 Technological Strategy in the Age of Exponential Growth By Carlo Kopp COMMUNICATIONS Forging Jointness Under Fire: Air-Ground Integration in Israel’s Lebanon and Please visit NDU Press and Joint Force 48 Quarterly online at ndupress.ndu.edu for more Gaza Wars on upcoming issues, an electronic archive of By Benjamin S. Lambeth JFQ articles, and access to many other useful Airpower Dollars and Sense: Rethinking the Relative Costs of Combat NDU Press publications. Constructive com- 54 ments and contributions are important to us. By Lee T. Wight Please direct editorial communications to the 62 Science vs. the Art of War link on the NDU Press Web site or write to: By Milan Vego Editor, Joint Force Quarterly National Defense University Press 260 Fifth Avenue, S.W. (Building 64, Room 2504) Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, DC 20319 Telephone: (202) 685-4220/DSN 325 FAX: (202) 685-4219/DSN 325 Email: [email protected] JFQ online: ndupress.ndu.edu 3rd Quarter, July 2012 ISSN 1070-0692 Features PUBLISHER GEN Martin E. Dempsey, USA From Niche to Necessity: Integrating Nonlethal Weapons into Essential 71 PRESIDENT, NDU Enabling Capabilities MG Gregg F. Martin, USA By Tracy J. Tafolla, David J. Trachtenberg, and John A. Aho ADVISORY COMMITTEE Maj Gen Joseph D. Brown IV, USAF Industrial College of the The V-22 Osprey: From Troubled Past to Viable and Flexible Option Armed Forces 80 RADM John N. Christenson, USN Naval War College By Eric Braganca Brig Gen Stephen T. Denker, USAF Air Command and Staff College 85 The F-35 and the Future of Power Projection LtGen George J. Flynn, USMC Joint Staff By Robbin F. Laird and Edward T. Timperlake VADM William E. Gortney, USN The Joint Staff Maj Gen Scott M. Hanson, USAF Air War College Col Jay L. Hatton, USMC Marine Corps War College Book Reviews RADM Douglas J. McAneny, USN National War College Col Royal P. Mortenson, USMC Marine Corps Command Keep From All Thoughtful Men: How U.S. Economists and Staff College 94 VADM Daniel T. Oliver, USN (Ret.) Naval Postgraduate School Won World War II LTG David G. Perkins, USA U.S. Army Command and Reviewed by David A. Anderson General Staff College ADM James G. Stavridis, USN U.S. European Command The Shaping of Grand Strategy: Policy, Diplomacy, and War Maj Gen Joseph S. Ward, Jr., USAF Joint Forces 95 Staff College Reviewed by Francis P. Sempa EDITORIAL BOARD Richard K. Betts Columbia University 96 Defiant Failed State: The North Korean Threat to International Security Stephen D. Chiabotti School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Eliot A. Cohen The Johns Hopkins University Reviewed by Robert Daniel Wallace COL Joseph J. Collins, USA (Ret.) National War College Mark J. Conversino Air War College Aaron L. Friedberg Princeton University Joint Doctrine Col Thomas C. Greenwood, USMC (Ret.) Office of the Secretary of Defense Joint Doctrine Update Douglas N. Hime Naval War College 97 Mark H. Jacobsen Marine Corps Command and Staff College Daniel T. Kuehl Information Resources Management College Col David Lapan, USMC The Joint Staff Col Jerome M. Lynes, USMC (Ret.) The Joint Staff Thomas L. McNaugher Georgetown University Kathleen Mahoney-Norris Air Command and Staff College Col Mark Pizzo, USMC (Ret.) National War College James A. Schear Office of the Secretary of Defense LtGen Bernard E. Trainor, USMC (Ret.) CONTRIBUTIONS Joint Force Quarterly welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from members of the Armed Forces, security policymakers and shapers, defense analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address on the opposite page or by email to [email protected] “Attention A&R Editor” in the subject line. For further information, see the guidelines on the NDU Press Web site at ndupress.ndu.edu. Joint Force Quarterly is published by the National Defense University Press for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. JFQ is the ABOUT THE COVERS Chairman’s flagship joint military and security studies journal designed to inform members of the U.S. Armed Forces, allies, and other partners on joint and integrated operations; national security Front cover: Soldier exits UH-60 Blackhawk in village of Darrah-I- policy and strategy; efforts to combat terrorism; homeland security; Bum, Badghis Province, Afghanistan (U.S. Marine Corps/Brian and developments in training and joint professional military Kester). Table of contents shows (left to right) Soldiers in M2 education to transform America’s military and security apparatus to Bradley Fighting Vehicles approach firing line at Nightmare Range, meet tomorrow’s challenges better while protecting freedom today. Camp Casey, Republic of Korea (U.S. Army/Ryan Elliott); Navy The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations chaplain prays with Marines before security patrol in Sangin, expressed or implied within are those of the Afghanistan (British Royal Army/James Elmer); Navy SEALs contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of hoisted onto Air Force Special Operations CV-22 Osprey at the Department of Defense or any other agency of the Hurlburt Field (U.S. Air Force/Andy M. Kin); and Seaman stands Federal Government. watch in combat information center aboard USS Monterey (U.S. ndupress.ndu.edu Navy/Daniel Viramontes). From the Chairman Making Strategy Work arlier this year, the President and was released, the Vice Chairman and I have down to violent nonstate actors, and they are Secretary of Defense released gathered with the Service chiefs and combat- proliferating horizontally, across advanced new strategic defense guidance, ant commanders for three full-day strategy militaries in the world. As a result, more Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: seminars in Quantico, Virginia. We used people have the ability to harm us than at any E st point in many decades. Priorities for 21 Century Defense. Six months these unprecedented forums to stress-test the on, I would like to share some of my insights strategy against some of the most challenging Another compelling feature of our time about making the strategy and about making security scenarios we may face as a nation. is a new fiscal reality. Cost has reemerged as the strategy work. This is exactly how it is supposed to work. an independent variable in the U.S. national Strategy is essentially about choices— Strategic choices are not made in isola- security equation. We have often defined our choices about how to achieve our aims with tion. Instead, they are informed by a context. desired endstates before fully considering the resources available to us. A sound strategy Once made, choices have consequences that the cost. The money was there for us. As we reconciles ends, ways, and means. Strategic create new context. It is an iterative process— advance on the joint force that we will need coherence, however, does not just happen. that never ends. In this respect, strategy is as in 2020, we must consider cost sooner in our Rather, it results from dialogue and debate. much emergent as it is deliberate. decisionmaking. We need to be more afford- Our new defense strategy emerged from just The context we confront today can best able in every possible way. such a collaborative process. The Service be described as a security paradox. True, geo- Within this context, the strategy makes chiefs, who are charged with developing the political trends are ushering in greater levels choices that are already being put to work. I force for the strategy, were heard early and of peace and stability worldwide. But destruc- will highlight three, but there are more. First, often. The combatant commanders, charged tive technologies are also available to a wider we are mainlining capabilities that have really with executing the strategy, all weighed in. array of adversaries. Destructive—and dis- come into their own over the last decade. And we were all afforded extraordinary access ruptive—technologies are proliferating down Among these are cyber, special operations, to our civilian leaders.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • To Examine the Horrors of Trench Warfare
    TRENCH WARFARE Objective: To examine the horrors of trench warfare. What problems faced attacking troops? What was Trench Warfare? Trench Warfare was a type of fighting during World War I in which both sides dug trenches that were protected by mines and barbed wire Cross-section of a front-line trench How extensive were the trenches? An aerial photograph of the opposing trenches and no-man's land in Artois, France, July 22, 1917. German trenches are at the right and bottom, British trenches are at the top left. The vertical line to the left of centre indicates the course of a pre-war road. What was life like in the trenches? British trench, France, July 1916 (during the Battle of the Somme) What was life like in the trenches? French soldiers firing over their own dead What were trench rats? Many men killed in the trenches were buried almost where they fell. These corpses, as well as the food scraps that littered the trenches, attracted rats. Quotes from soldiers fighting in the trenches: "The rats were huge. They were so big they would eat a wounded man if he couldn't defend himself." "I saw some rats running from under the dead men's greatcoats, enormous rats, fat with human flesh. My heart pounded as we edged towards one of the bodies. His helmet had rolled off. The man displayed a grimacing face, stripped of flesh; the skull bare, the eyes devoured and from the yawning mouth leapt a rat." What other problems did soldiers face in the trenches? Officers walking through a flooded communication trench.
    [Show full text]
  • Trench Warfare
    Aaron Berman, Will Ryan, and Jim Wald Trench Warfare A Comparative Analysis of Civil War and World War I Trenches Lauren Fraser 4/30/2013 Page | 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: “A Soldier’s Life for Me”…Life in the Trenches ....................................... 7 Chapter 2: The Building of the Trenches ....... 32 Chapter 3: European Observations and the Trenches of WWI ............................... 55 Conclusion: ................................... 79 Bibliography .................................. 85 Page | 2 Trench Warfare A Comparative Analysis of Civil War and World War I Trenches Intro: Trench warfare, or occasionally “siege warfare”, is often defined as a form of “occupied fighting lines” in which soldiers are protected by field works from an opposing front’s artillery and small-arms fire. One tends to picture trench warfare as two large armies bogged down due to heavy artillery and unable to do more than move gradually inch by inch across a battlefield; or of men leaping out of trenches to dash headlong into immense fire and certain death. Sometimes considered representative of futility in war, trench warfare has become synonymous with stalemates in the midst of conflict, of the wearing down of enemy forces until they are unable to continue from lack of arms or morale, and of a form of warfare that is nothing more than senseless slaughter in less-than-stellar environments. Trench warfare is so often associated with World War I because its usage was such a prominent characteristic. Tactically and strategically, the use of trenches for defensive purposes was not particularly new by 1914. Field fortifications – forts, strongholds, and even trenches – have Page | 3 been in sporadic usage throughout warfare as far back as the Romans, although not to the same extent as during the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Wooster, OH), 2006-04-21 Wooster Voice Editors
    The College of Wooster Open Works The oV ice: 2001-2011 "The oV ice" Student Newspaper Collection 4-21-2006 The oW oster Voice (Wooster, OH), 2006-04-21 Wooster Voice Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/voice2001-2011 Recommended Citation Editors, Wooster Voice, "The oosW ter Voice (Wooster, OH), 2006-04-21" (2006). The Voice: 2001-2011. 140. https://openworks.wooster.edu/voice2001-2011/140 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the "The oV ice" Student Newspaper Collection at Open Works, a service of The oC llege of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in The oV ice: 2001-2011 by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wdoster Voice VOL. CXXII, lie ISSUE XXIV Serving the College of Wooster since 1883 Friday, April 21, 2006 "A liberal arts education is supposed to provide you with a value system, a standard, a set of ideas, not a job. Caroline Bird Wooster this incoming cia looks bright Laura McHugh coming in, now through the week of become industry standard to report it." There are many good things about the May 1st." May 1 is National 'This is a very talented group of class of '09," said Chief Staff Writer Gueldenzoph. Candidates Response Date, the cut-o- ff students from all over" he said. Those However, he said that having only 14 Week With a new academic year right day for confirmation. While they have who applied 46 states and represent 45 African Americans in the class stood V around the corner, Dean of only' received 192 confirmations, countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of the German Soldier on the Eastern Front
    AUTONOMY IN THE GREAT WAR: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GERMAN SOLDIER ON THE EASTERN FRONT A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University Of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS By Kevin Patrick Baker B.A. University of Kansas, 2007 Kansas City, Missouri 2012 ©2012 KEVIN PATRICK BAKER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AUTONOMY IN THE GREAT WAR: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GERMAN SOLDIER ON THE EASTERN FRONT Kevin Patrick Baker, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2012 ABSTRACT From 1914 to 1919, the German military established an occupation zone in the territory of present day Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia. Cultural historians have generally focused on the role of German soldiers as psychological and physical victims trapped in total war that was out of their control. Military historians have maintained that these ordinary German soldiers acted not as victims but as perpetrators causing atrocities in the occupied lands of the Eastern Front. This paper seeks to build on the existing scholarship on the soldier’s experience during the Great War by moving beyond this dichotomy of victim vs. perpetrator in order to describe the everyday existence of soldiers. Through the lens of individual selfhood, this approach will explore the gray areas that saturated the experience of war. In order to gain a better understanding of how ordinary soldiers appropriated individual autonomy in total war, this master’s thesis plans to use an everyday-life approach by looking at individual soldiers’ behaviors underneath the canopy of military hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Von Hötzendorf and the “Smoking Gun”: a Biographical Examination of Responsibility and Traditions of Violence Against Civilians in the Habsburg Army 55
    1914: Austria-Hungary, the Origins, and the First Year of World War I Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) Samuel R. Williamson, Jr. (Guest Editor) CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 23 uno press innsbruck university press Copyright © 2014 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, LA 138, 2000 Lakeshore Drive. New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Printed in the United States of America Design by Allison Reu Cover photo: “In enemy position on the Piave levy” (Italy), June 18, 1918 WK1/ALB079/23142, Photo Kriegsvermessung 5, K.u.k. Kriegspressequartier, Lichtbildstelle Vienna Cover photo used with permission from the Austrian National Library – Picture Archives and Graphics Department, Vienna Published in the United States by Published and distributed in Europe University of New Orleans Press by Innsbruck University Press ISBN: 9781608010264 ISBN: 9783902936356 uno press Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Ferdinand Karlhofer, Universität Innsbruck Assistant Editor Markus Habermann
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Trenches in WW1
    Life in the Trenches in WW1 Trench warfare was a tactic used by British, French and Russian Forces, on one side and German and Austrian armies on the other, fighting on both the Western and Eastern Fronts during World War 1. Why dig trenches? To protect soldiers from shell fire and stop the enemy advancing forward. Size 1-2 metres wide, and 3m deep Types In the British Sectors there were 3 lines of trenches: the front, support and reserve. Life in the Trenches in WW1 Trenches were defensive positions formed out of dug-out embankments. They were protected by barbed wire and reinforced with sandbags and wood. The bottom was covered with boards, made of wood, called duckboards. Duckboards were supposed to protect the soldiers’ feet from the water and mud but trenches were often muddy damp places when exposed to bad weather. The front trench This was made up of fire and command trenches. The fire trenches were not straight but continuous and had sections or firebays. These were as much as 9 metres long. They were separated by traverses. The traverses helped protect the soldiers from blasts from shells which could land in the next bay and from attacks down the middle of the trench. Soldiers spent 8 days in this trench. These trenches contained a Fire Step which was 2-3 metres high and used by the soldiers to fire through the parapet sandbags at the top of the trench at the enemy. The command trenches had officer command posts in them. They also had dug outs, for rest, and latrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Presence Absence Polymorphism for Alternative Pathogenicity Islands In
    Presence͞absence polymorphism for alternative pathogenicity islands in Pseudomonas viridiflava, a pathogen of Arabidopsis Hitoshi Araki†‡, Dacheng Tian§, Erica M. Goss†, Katrin Jakob†, Solveig S. Halldorsdottir†, Martin Kreitman†, and Joy Bergelson†¶ †Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and §Department of Biology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Republic of China Communicated by Tomoko Ohta, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan, March 1, 2006 (received for review January 25, 2006) The contribution of arms race dynamics to plant–pathogen coevo- pathogens are defined and differentiated from close relatives by lution has been called into question by the presence of balanced horizontally acquired virulence factors (12). However, a survey polymorphisms in resistance genes of Arabidopsis thaliana, but of effectors in Pseudomonas syringae finds effectors that have less is known about the pathogen side of the interaction. Here we been acquired recently and others that have been transmitted investigate structural polymorphism in pathogenicity islands (PAIs) predominantly by descent, indicating that pathogenicity may in Pseudomonas viridiflava, a prevalent bacterial pathogen of A. evolve in both genomic contexts (13). thaliana. PAIs encode the type III secretion system along with its In this study, we investigated PAIs in P. viridiflava, which is a effectors and are essential for pathogen recognition in plants. P. prevalent bacterial pathogen of wild A. thaliana populations viridiflava harbors two structurally distinct and highly diverged PAI (14). P. viridiflava is in the P. syringae group (15). Although P. paralogs (T- and S-PAI) that are integrated in different chromo- syringae is intensively studied as a bacterial plant pathogen (13, some locations in the P.
    [Show full text]
  • Going on with Christ: 1971 Arkansas Baptist State Convention Arkansas Baptist State Convention
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Arkansas Baptist State Convention Annuals Arkansas Baptist History 11-16-1971 Going on with Christ: 1971 Arkansas Baptist State Convention Arkansas Baptist State Convention Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/abscannuals Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Arkansas Baptist State Convention, "Going on with Christ: 1971 Arkansas Baptist State Convention" (1971). Arkansas Baptist State Convention Annuals. 113. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/abscannuals/113 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Arkansas Baptist History at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arkansas Baptist State Convention Annuals by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 197 1 ANNUAL of the AJrKall1l§a§ JEaIPltll§lt §ltalte Co 1l1le V Irntll0 1l1l in the ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL SESSION (123rd Year) Held at: Host Church for Next Session: Second Baptist Church Second Baptist Church Robinson Auditorium Hot Springs, Arkansas Little Rock, Arkansas November 14-16, 1972 November 16-18, 1971 Preacher of Annual Sermon: Edited by: Bernes K. Selph, Benton 1\111's. Nadine Bj orkman Administrative Secretary Alternate: 525 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Clifford Palmer, Springdale 1971 CONVENTION OFFICERS Rheubin L. South, Park Hill, North Little Rock ............. President Paul Sanders, Geyer Springs, First, Little Rock ......First Vice President Dr. James Sawyer, Benton ................ .....Second Vice President Charles H. Ashcraft, Baptist Building, Little Rock ................... Secretary-Treasurer TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSOCIATIONAL DIRECTORY _ . ..... ... _ - _ - - - - - ____. ___ 220 AUDITS ............__ .
    [Show full text]
  • Trench Warfare in World War I Overview Much of the Fighting During World War I Was Done from the Trenches, a Grueling and Horrific Experience for Soldiers
    Trench Warfare in World War I Overview Much of the fighting during World War I was done from the trenches, a grueling and horrific experience for soldiers. In this lesson, students will participate in an experiential activity based on trench warfare and have their interest peaked regarding this period of history with the macabre yet realistic details of war life. Students will further learn about World War I though examination of the poem “The Rear-Guard” by Siegfried Sassoon. Grade 8 North Carolina Essential Standards • 8.H.2.1 - Explain the impact of economic, political, social, and military conflicts (e.g. war, slavery, states’ rights and citizenship and immigration policies) on the development of North Carolina and the United States. • 8.H.3.2 - Explain how changes brought about by technology and other innovations affected individuals and groups in North Carolina and the United States (e.g. advancements in transportation, communication networks and business practices). Essential Questions • What weapons (previously used and new inventions) were used in fighting World War I? • What was the experience of a soldier fighting in WWI? • What were conditions like in WWI trenches and tunnels? Materials • 50-100 sheets of balled-up paper in two different colors • War sound effects (optional) • Images of WWI Trench’s, examples attached • Excerpts of WWI Letters from Soldiers, examples attached • The Rear-Guard, a poem by Siegfried Sassoon, attached • The Rear-Guard Response Sheet, attached Duration 60 minutes Teacher Preparation For the opening experiential activity, desks need to be turned on their sides and pushed into two straight lines, one on each side of the room so that a large open space is available in the middle of the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artillery of Critique Versus the General Uncritical Consensus: Standing up to Propaganda, 1990-1999
    THE ARTILLERY OF CRITIQUE VERSUS THE GENERAL UNCRITICAL CONSENSUS: STANDING UP TO PROPAGANDA, 1990-1999 by Andrew Alexander Monti Master of Arts, York University, Toronto, Canada, 2013 Bachelor of Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy, 2005 A dissertation presented to Ryerson University and York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Joint Program of Communication and Culture Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Andrew Alexander Monti, 2018 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A DISSERTATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this dissertation. This is a true copy of the dissertation, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this dissertation to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my dissertation may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT The Artillery of Critique versus the General Uncritical Consensus: Standing Up to Propaganda, 1990-1999 Andrew Alexander Monti Doctor of Philosophy Communication and Culture Ryerson University, 2018 In 2011, leading comedy scholars singled-out two shortcomings in stand-up comedy research. The first shortcoming suggests a theoretical void: that although “a number of different disciplines take comedy as their subject matter, the opportunities afforded to the inter-disciplinary study of comedy are rarely, if ever, capitalized on.”1 The second indicates a methodological void: there is a “lack of literature on ‘how’ to analyse stand-up comedy.”2 This research project examines the relationship between political consciousness and satirical humour in stand-up comedy and attempts to redress these two shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory in World War I American Museum Exhibits
    MEMORY IN WORLD WAR I AMERICAN MUSEUM EXHIBITS by HANNAH MARSH B.A., Western Michigan University 2010 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History Collage of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Approved by: Major Professor Sue Zschoche Abstract As the world enters the centennial of World War I, interest in this war is reviving. Books, television shows, and movies are bringing the war into popular culture. Now that all the participants of the war have passed away a change is occurring in in American memory. The transition from living to non-living memory is clearly visible in museums, one of the main ways history is communicated to the public. Four museums are studied in this paper. Two exhibits built in the 1990s are in the 1st Infantry Division Museum at Fort Riley, Kansas, and the Chemical Corps Museum in Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. The other two exhibits are newer and are the National World War I Museum in Kansas City, Missouri and the Cantigny 1st Infantry Division Museum in Wheaton, Illinois. Findings reveal that exhibits become more inclusive over time to civilian bodies, wounded bodies, and the specific image of “Americans killing Germans bodies.” However, even though there is change some things are turning into myths. The icon of the American soldier as a healthy and strong man willing to sacrifice his life for the country is still a major theme throughout all the exhibits. Finally, there are several myths that America has adopted from its allies.
    [Show full text]