DOCSLIB.ORG

Marketing Brochure/Flyer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marketing Brochure/Flyer www.brephoenix.com [email protected] [email protected] 602.224.4477 602.224.4439 fx: 602.468.8588 fx: Senior Associate Senior President Vice Senior 602.954.9000 ph: Gary Anderson Gary Justin LeMaster Justin Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Arizona Phoenix, 300 Suite Rd, Camelback E. 2375 For more information, please contact: please information, more For ±132 Acres (Divisible) Acres ±132 Build-to-Suit/Sale for Available >> 4 Hours to Los Angeles Los to Hours 4 >> Phoenix to Hours 3.4 >> Vegas Las to Hours 1.5 >> SEC Vanderslice Road & Reservation Road, Mohave Valley, Arizona Valley, Mohave Road, Reservation & Road Vanderslice SEC Park Business Mohave-Tri-State Mohave-Tri-State Business Park SEC Vanderslice Road & Reservation Road, Mohave Valley, Arizona Becknell Industrial Properties www.becknellindustrial.com Select Client List • Privately held company, founded in 1990 • Headquartered in Chicago (Lyons), IL • Owns 85 facilities nationwide • 7,200,000 SF Total in portfolio • Specializes in development and long-term ownership of industrial properties • Clients include Fortune 500 and entrepreneurial companies Mohave Tri-State Business Park is located ±10 miles west of the Canamex Corridor (US-93). www.canamex.org at For more information, please contact: 2375 E. Camelback Rd, Suite 300 Gary Anderson Justin LeMaster Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Senior Vice President Senior Associate ph: 602.954.9000 fx: 602.468.8588 602.224.4439 602.224.4477 [email protected] [email protected] www.brephoenix.com The information contained herein has been given to us by the owner of the property or other sources we deem reliable. We have no reason to doubt its accuracy, but we do not guarantee it. All information should be verified prior to purchase or lease. Mohave-Tri-State Business Park SEC Vanderslice Road & Reservation Road, Mohave Valley, Arizona Site plan Site Features Site Utilities Phase I, ±150 Acres • 132 acres remaining (Divisible) • Electric, Water, Sewer, Data In Place • Fully improved/shovel ready development Electric: Mohave Electric Corporation • ±50,000 SF to ±1,000,000 SF Capable Sewage: Fort Mohave Tribal Utilities • Turn-key design build construction Water: Well on Site • ESFR capable building Phone/Data: Frontier Communications • Zoned: CMO (Commercial, manufacturing, • High-speed fiber optic (DS3) service available open storage) • T-4 data transmission service optional • Parcel #: 224-07-029 • Mohave Electric Power Plant is ±1.50 miles from Mohave Tri-State Business Park ±2500 Locational Features 2010 Demographics • 2 Miles east of AZ Route 95 • Within 250 miles or 3.5 hour drive • 4 miles east of I-40 full-diamond interchange • 10 miles east of I-40/I-95 interchange Employed Population 11,594,112 Population 29,234,771 Households 9,753,412 Median Age 34.0 Average Household Income $75,483 ±2600 The Arizona Advantage Source: www.gpec.org CALIFORNIA ARIZONA Companies pay higher salaries, taxes and real estate On average, wages are 20% lower or $10,200 less is more expensive per worker; corporate income tax rate is 21% lower; commercial office lease rates are 23% lower Commercial and industrial customers in California Industrial electricity rate is 35% lower and more pay more than double the national average for reliable electricity* *Source: CA Energy Commission Workers compensation insurance costs have posted WorkersMOHAVE compensation COUNTY, and unemployment ARIZONA insurance double digit annual percentage increases since 1997 are 58% and 41% lower, respectively Mohave County Economic Development Department “Oppressive” business climate and regulatory A right-to-work3250 E. Kino state; Avenue, low 2nd union Floor presence: | Kingman, AZno 86409inventory red tape tax and aggressiveTel. (928)additional 757-0960 depreciation | Fax. (928) 757-0934schedules www.mohavedevelopment.org MAJOR INDUSTRIES Water Rights Manufacturing N E V A D A U T A H • High volume water users can access Mohave Transportation & Logistics Mohave County Tri-State Business Park’s water rights through Industrial 15 12-inch water lines LAS VEGAS ABF Freight System, Inc. • The water rights allow access to seven acre feet or Mohave Tri-State 2,275,000 gallons per acre per year C A L I F O R N I A 93 Chemical Lime Company MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA Mohave County Economic Development Department Mineral Park Mine • The water is sufficient enough to support a 3250 E. Kino Avenue, 2nd Floor | Kingman, AZ 86409 Tel. (928) 757-0960 | Fax. (928) 757-0934 www.mohavedevelopment.org MAJOR INDUSTRIES 66 bottling operation or manufacturing plant. McKee Foods Manufacturing U T A H KINGMAN N E V A D A JM Eagle Transportation & Logistics • There are on-site wells capable of supporting ESFR 15 Mohave County Industrial 15 BULLHEAD CITY LAS VEGAS ABF Freight System, Inc. 40 40 sprinkler systems in all Mohave Tri-State facilities C A L I F O R N I A Guardian Industries LOS 93 Chemical Lime Company Mineral Park Mine ANGELES SANMcKee Foods BERNARDINO66 KINGMAN JM Eagle Praxair, Inc. 15 BULLHEAD CITY 95 American Woodmark Corporation 40 Guardian Industries 40 LOS ANGELES SAN BERNARDINO Praxair, Inc. 95 American Woodmark Corporation LAKE HAVASU CITY Laron Engineering LAKE HAVASU CITY RIVERSIDE Sterlite Corporation LONG Tru-Serv A R I Z O N A Laron Engineering BEACH New West Dental Ceramics IWX Motor Freight RIVERSIDE 93 Nucor Steel Central Trucking, Inc. 17 Sterlite Corporation LONG 10 Tru-Serv A R I Z O N A BEACH PHOENIX SAN DIEGO 8 New West Dental Ceramics >> 55 Minutes to Kingman IWX Motor Freight 10 93 ENSENADA Nucor Steel MEXICO TUCSON N Central Trucking, Inc. 10 17 Map provided by: Mohave County >> 1.50 Hours to Las Vegas Economic Development PHOENIX SAN DIEGO 8 • 9 hours to Reno, NV ¤£191 ¤£395 UTAH ¤£95 ! ¤£89 • 7.45 hours to Salt Lake City, UT NEVADA .Stt.. Georrge Frresno ¨¦§15 .! 93 • 12 hours to Denver, CO ¨¦§5 ¤£ ¤£160 Laass Veegaass 10 ENSENADA .! A R I Z O N A .!Henderrson >> 3.4 Hours to Phoenix ¤£191 ¤£101 CALIFORNIA ¨¦§15 ¤£89 MEXICO TUCSON N ¤£95 ¤£93 • 2.5 hours to Flagstaff, AZ San Luiis ¨¦§5 .! .! Baakkeerrssffiieelld Kiinnggmaann Fllagsttaffff Obiispo H! ¨¦§40 .! • 5.5 hours to Tucson, AZ ¨¦§40 ¤£395 ¨¦§15 ! • 7.2 hours to Albuquerque, NM ¨¦§40 ¤£93 ¤£180 ! . ¤£89 ¤£101 ¨¦§5 Lake San Bernardino ¤£95 ¨¦§17 ! .!San Bernardino Havasu Ciitty ¤£60 >> 4 Hours to Los Angeles, CA . ¨¦§10 Los Angeles ¨¦§10 Los Angeles .! .! ¤£60 ¤£60 Long Beach ¨¦§10 ¨¦§10 Phoeniix Mesa • 4 hours to Long Beach, CA Santta Ana .! .!Mesa ¤£666 ¨¦§5 ¤£80 ¨¦§15 ¤£95 ¨¦§10 ¤£70 • 4.75 hours to San Diego, CA PACIFIC 3 H!Caassaa Grraannddee 0 ¨¦§8 • 8.20 hours to Oakland, CA OCEAN 0 San .! ¨¦§8 .! ¨¦§8 M ¨¦§10 i Diego Yuma le Diego s Tucson .!Tucson ¨¦§10 >> 7.75 Hours to El Paso, TX MEXICO ¨¦§19 ¯ ¤£191 Main Rail Line Mohave-Tri-State Business Park SEC Vanderslice Road & Reservation Road, Mohave Valley, Arizona Site plan Site Features Site Utilities Phase I, ±150 Acres • 132 acres remaining (Divisible) • Electric, Water, Sewer, Data In Place • Fully improved/shovel ready development Electric: Mohave Electric Corporation • ±50,000 SF to ±1,000,000 SF Capable Sewage: Fort Mohave Tribal Utilities • Turn-key design build construction Water: Well on Site • ESFR capable building Phone/Data: Frontier Communications • Zoned: CMO (Commercial, manufacturing, • High-speed fiber optic (DS3) service available open storage) • T-4 data transmission service optional • Parcel #: 224-07-029 • Mohave Electric Power Plant is ±1.50 miles from Mohave Tri-State Business Park ±2500 Locational Features 2010 Demographics • 2 Miles east of AZ Route 95 • Within 250 miles or 3.5 hour drive • 4 miles east of I-40 full-diamond interchange • 10 miles east of I-40/I-95 interchange Employed Population 11,594,112 Population 29,234,771 Households 9,753,412 Median Age 34.0 Average Household Income $75,483 ±2600 The Arizona Advantage Source: www.gpec.org CALIFORNIA ARIZONA Companies pay higher salaries, taxes and real estate On average, wages are 20% lower or $10,200 less is more expensive per worker; corporate income tax rate is 21% lower; commercial office lease rates are 23% lower Commercial and industrial customers in California Industrial electricity rate is 35% lower and more pay more than double the national average for reliable electricity* *Source: CA Energy Commission Workers compensation insurance costs have posted WorkersMOHAVE compensation COUNTY, and unemployment ARIZONA insurance double digit annual percentage increases since 1997 are 58% and 41% lower, respectively Mohave County Economic Development Department “Oppressive” business climate and regulatory A right-to-work3250 E. Kino state; Avenue, low 2nd union Floor presence: | Kingman, AZno 86409inventory red tape tax and aggressiveTel. (928)additional 757-0960 depreciation | Fax. (928) 757-0934schedules www.mohavedevelopment.org MAJOR INDUSTRIES Water Rights Manufacturing N E V A D A U T A H • High volume water users can access Mohave Transportation & Logistics Mohave County Tri-State Business Park’s water rights through Industrial 15 12-inch water lines LAS VEGAS ABF Freight System, Inc. • The water rights allow access to seven acre feet or Mohave Tri-State 2,275,000 gallons per acre per year C A L I F O R N I A 93 Chemical Lime Company MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA Mohave County Economic Development Department Mineral Park Mine • The water is sufficient enough to support a 3250 E. Kino Avenue, 2nd Floor | Kingman, AZ 86409 Tel. (928) 757-0960 | Fax. (928) 757-0934 www.mohavedevelopment.org MAJOR INDUSTRIES 66 bottling operation or manufacturing plant. McKee Foods Manufacturing U T A H KINGMAN N E V A D A JM Eagle Transportation & Logistics • There are on-site wells capable of supporting ESFR 15 Mohave County Industrial 15 BULLHEAD CITY LAS VEGAS ABF Freight System, Inc. 40 40 sprinkler systems in all Mohave Tri-State facilities C A L I F O R N I A Guardian Industries LOS 93 Chemical Lime Company Mineral Park Mine ANGELES SANMcKee Foods BERNARDINO66 KINGMAN JM Eagle Praxair, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement F
    From: Karen Summitt To: Thomas Buschatzke; Sharon Scantlebury Subject: Fw: Objections to the MVIDD Water Transfer Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:24:42 PM Attachments: ADWR Letter.docx November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement for CAWCD to Acquire Water Rights and Land in Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, Mohave County, Arizona Dear Thomas Buschatzkle, I write to advise you that I am opposed to the proposed Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD) land and water purchase to move Colorado River water, prudently set aside for rural Arizona Colorado River mainstream users, to central Arizona for replenishment. As you may recall, the Mohave County Board of Supervisors passed two resolutions opposing the permanent transfer of any Colorado River Water Rights and Allocations to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District for use in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District – first as to the Quartzsite transfer and second as to the WPI-WAN transfer in the Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District. Here is why I oppose this purchase and transfer of our water: First, as a matter of public policy, 4th Priority Colorado River water allocated to the users on the mainstream of the River, such as Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District (“MVIDD”) in this case, should not be transferred away from mainstream of the River. This is part of the water that the State of Arizona requested be reserved for municipal and industrial uses along the River. Except for that small reservation of 4th Priority Colorado River water to the users on the mainstream, CAWCD received all of Arizona’s Colorado River entitlement remaining at the time that CAWCD and the United States entered into their initial agreement in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mohave County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Background and Scope ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Assurances ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Mohave County ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bullhead City ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Colorado City ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Kingman ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Lake
    [Show full text]
  • River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE
    DINING REAL ESTATE RECREATION EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT HEALTH Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE Bullhead City | Laughlin | Fort Mohave | Mohave Valley | Needles Relocating to the EXPERIENCE River Cities AWARD-WINNING EXCITEMENT! Best Casino PLAY – Casino Player Magazine Best Hotel Best Overall Gaming Resort STAY – Casino Player Magazine Best Overall Dining DINE – Casino Player Magazine CALL TODAY TO MAKE YOUR RESERVATION AND WE’LL WELCOME YOU TO THE RIVER 800.950.7700 GOLDENNUGGET.COM Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE CONTENTS DINING 4 REAL ESTATE 8 RECREATION 12 EDUCATION 22 DEVELOPMENT 28 HEALTH 32 Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE Relocating to the River Cities LARRY KENDRICK General Manager | WELLS ANDREWS Sales/Circulation Director BILL MCMILLEN Editorial | ERIC FRAKES Operations Manager | JASON LORD Layout & Design ADVERTISING: Jody Bristyan, CAREY FEARING, JAMIE MCCORKLE, NANCY Novak, LU WEISS PRODUCTION: BEN KANE Prepress Manager, MICHAEL KENITZER Relocating to the River Cities is published and distributed annually. The Bullhead Area Chamber of Commerce contributed to this magazine and will make the guide available online and at their local office. Call the chamber at (928) 754-4121 to request by mail. Although every attempt is to be as accurate as possible, News West Publishing is not responsible for any errors, misprints, omissions, or accuracy of the stories in this publication. ©2019 News West Publishing, Inc News West Publishing | 2435 Miracle Mile, P.O. Box 21209, Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | 928.763.2505 | www.MohaveDailyNews.com 3 DINING The River Cities are home to a wide variety of fantastic restaurants suited for any taste.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca-Lower-Colorado-River-Valley-Pkwy
    I • I I I ) I I A REPORT TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ---1 I 'I I I I THE LOWER I COLORADO I RIVER I VALLEY • PARKWAY I I D- '°'le> F; 1-e. ·• NFS- ' f\CAc:.+... \ V"C. , ~ P,of>oseol I ~~~~=-'~c f~l~~c~~w I THE LOWER COLORADO I filVERVALLEYPARKWAY I I I A proposal for a National Parkway and Scenic Recreation Road System along the Lower Colorado River Valley in 'I California, Arizona, and Nevada. I NATIONAL PARK .i DENVER SEfiViC I ·-.-:. a.t ..1flkllb""ll.--';,.i. n II"~ r.· " •· \..' ;: · I ;:~::::.;.;:;.:J I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service I in cooperation with Lower Colorado River Office Bureau of Land Management • PLE~\SE RtTUR?j TO: I February 1969 I , lJnited States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 I I Dear Mr. President: We are pleased to transmit herewith. a report on the feasibility anc;l desirability of developing a nation~l p;;i.rkwa,y and sc;enic recreation I road system within. the Lower C9l9rado River· Vaiiey in Arizona, Califo~nia, and Nevada, from the Lake Mead National Recreation I Area and Davis Dam on the north to the International Boup.d:;i.ry ~ith Mexico on the south in: the vicinity of San Luis, Arizqna arid Mexic.o.· . ·. ' .. ·.' . ·. I This :i;eport is based on ci. study 11,'lade by the Lower Col<;>rado River Office ap.d the NatiQnal :Par~ Service pf this Depa.rtmep.t with engineerin.g assistance by the Buqlau of Public Roads of the Departmep.t of .
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Powerplant Modification Feasibility Report
    HOOVER POWERPLANT MODIFICATION FEASIBILITY REPORT APPENDIX C HYDROLOGY MAY 1981 PREPARED BY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REGION APPENDIX C - HYDROLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION .....C-1 A. Purpose .....C-1 B. Background .....C-1 C. Location .....C-1 D. Climate .....C-1 E. Alternatives Considered .....C-1 1. Surface .......... C-1 2. Underground Powerhouse .....C-1 3. Replacement of Units A8 and A9 .... C-2 4. Pumped-Back Storage .....C-2 II. WATER SUPPLY AND RESERVOIR OPERATION .....C-3 A. Present Condition .....C-3 1. Water Supply .....C-3 a. Runoff .....C-3 b. Demands .....C-3 2. Reservoir Operation .....C-5 a. Control of River Operations .....C-5 b. Forecasted Water Supply .....C-6 c. Scheduled Annual Water Requirements . C-7 d. Daily Water Requirements .....C-8 e. Daily Operations .....C-8 f. Water Scheduling - Power Generation Relationship .....C-9 g. Historic Operational Data .....C-10 h. Weekly Release Patterns .....C-12 B. Future Conditions .....C-13 1. Water Supply .....C-13 a. Runoff .....C-13 b. Demands .....C-17 2. Reservoir Operation .....C-17 3. Lake Mohave Operation Study .....C-27 a. Study Results .....C-29 b. Study Evaluation and Conclusions . C-30 C-i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page III. TAILWATER STUDIES .................................. C-32 A. Introduction .................................. C-32 B. Design Discharges C-32 C. Water Surface Profiles ........................ C-34 1. Cross Sections ............................ C-34 2. Steady Flow Tailwater Study ................. C-35 3. Calibration of Unsteady Flow Model ......... C-35 4. Calibration of 1979 Steady Flow Model ....... C-38 5. Projections for Additional 500-MW Powerhouse ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Silt in the Colorado River and Its Relation to Irrigation
    2 8 2 5 1.0 ~ 11~12 8 111/12.5 1.0 ~ 1111/ . 1111i . w lili Iii~ lili I Iii LIO I.i£. LIO W w w IOi loa ~ :: ~ ~ 1.1 "'''M'" ~ 1.1 ..WL.:. ... -- 111111.8 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 111111.25 I1II1 1.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATION~L BUREAU or SlANDARO,·1963·A NATIONAL BUREAU OF SlANOAROS-1963-A ==~~==~~==~~~n~~-~======~ TECHNICAL BULLETI~ No. 67 -.. \!>~ =v February, 1928 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. SILT IN THE COLORADO RIVER AND ITS RELATION TO IRRIGATION By SAMUEL Pon-rulJlt, Senior Irrigation Engineer, and HARRY P. BLANEY, Associate Irrigation Engineer, D£vision of Agricultural Engineering, Bureau of Public Roads CONTENTS .Pnl;o Page Tntroductlon ________ "" __ _______ ____ ______ _____ I 'rho silt problom of tho lower basln____________ 29 Summnry nnd goneral conclusions_____________ 2 sm Investigations in Imporlal Valley, _________ 28 Colorado Hlver .13l1sln_________________________ 5 'rrnnsE0rtatlon of silt_________________________ 42 Churnctcr of sllt_______________________________ 8 Silt-snmilling equlnlIlcnt._____________________ 11 Silt In trlhlltnry strcnms_______________________ l:l ~~~!~~Fx~~~~~s_:::=========:=======:=======Literature cited _______________________________ g~92 Silt In the lower Colorado Rlver _______________ 22 Other publications relating to the silt prohlem_ 94 INTRODUCTION While silt is the creator of much <>J the agricultural wealth of the lower Oolomdo I~iver Basin) it is also the greatest menace to irrign­ tion development. and water control. When irrigation water con­ tnining silt is appliod to fields, the main portion of the silt is deposited near the upper end. From time to time the farmer is compelled to move the depositod silt to lower portions of tho field in order to keep tho land surfnce below the lovol of the irrigation ditch.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Planning & Zoning Department Zoning Ordinance
    Mohave County Planning & Zoning Department Zoning Ordinance TITLE AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING A GENERAL PLAN FOR MOHAVE COUNTY, PLANNING AND ZONING, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. BE IT ORDERED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MOHAVE COUNTY SHORT TITLE: This ordinance may be cited as the "Mohave County Zoning Regulations" Adopted: September 7, 1965 Revised: December 7, 2005 NOTICE: It shall not be the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Department to update the information contained herein. This ordinance contains the zoning information in effect on the date listed as revised above. Mohave County Planning & Zoning Department Zoning Ordinance Table of Contents MOHAVE COUNTY ZONING REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE 1 Jurisdiction 2 Planning Commission Jurisdiction 3 Zoning Administration Jurisdiction 4 Validity of this Ordinance 5 Validity of Permits and Licenses 6 Incorrect or Omitted Information 7 Deleted per Resolution 98-181 8 Fees 9 Definitions 10 General Purposes of Zoning Regulations 11 The Zoning Map 12 Establishment of Zones 12.1 Overlay Zone 13 Regulations for General or "A" Zone 13.1 Regulations for Airport Development or "A-D" Zone 14 Regulations for Agricultural Residential or "A-R" Zone 15 Regulations for Residential Recreation or "R-E" and Commercial Recreation or "C-RE" Zone 15.1 Regulations for Regional Parks or "R-P" Zone 15.2 Regulations for Community Parks or "C-P" Zone 15.3 Regulations for Neighborhood Parks or "N-P" Zone Table Of Contents,
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Heritage Trail System Draft Environmental Assessment LC-16-14
    Arizona Heritage Trail System Draft Environmental Assessment LC-16-14 Lower Colorado Region, Boulder City, NV U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation National Park Service April 2017 Boulder City, NV Arizona Heritage Trail Draft EA LC-16-14 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. Cover Photo: Looking south towards Bullhead City and Laughlin from proposed Heritage Trail System segment south of Davis Camp entrance. Arizona Heritage Trail Draft EA LC-16-14 Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Purpose and Need ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background for the Purpose and Need .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment
    Chapter Three Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 describes environmental resources (e.g., hydrologic, biologic, and socioeconomic) of the Colorado River Basin that could be affected by the proposed federal action and the range of alternatives for implementing the proposed federal action described in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, respectively. The extent to which each specific resource may be impacted is discussed in Chapter 4. Section 3.2 presents a general discussion of the geographic scope within which potential effects of the alternatives are analyzed, and describes each of the potentially affected Colorado River reaches and water service areas. Subsequent sections in this chapter describe specific resources that may be potentially affected, such as water deliveries, recreation and biologic resources. Each resource section contains a discussion of one or more specific issues identified for consideration through scoping, public review and comment, and internal review (Chapter 1, Table 1.5-1). Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for 3-1 October 2007 Lake Powell and Lake Mead Affected Environment Chapter 3 This page intentionally left blank. Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for October 2007 3-2 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.2 Geographic Scope The proposed federal action considers modified operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead over a wide range of reservoir elevations as addressed by the four operational elements discussed in Section 1.2, i.e., shortage conditions, coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, storage and delivery of Colorado River system and non-system water, and the modified ISG.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada
    Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada By D. G. METZGER and O. J. LOELTZ WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER SALTON SEA AREA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600334 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-02212 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract._ _________________________________________ Jl Ground-water resources of the Needles area--------_-_- J18 18 Introduction-______________________________________ 3 Occurrence_ ___________-____-_-____-_--_--_--- Rocharge_-_________-____-__--__-----_------__- 18 Purpose of investigation_________________________ 3 Dischargs____ _ _________-__-_--__--_--------__-- 19 Location of area._______________________________ 3 Historicael ketch._____-____--__--__---_--_--_- 19 Methods of investigation.____---__-_-.__________ 3 Develepment of irrigation _________________ 20 Surface features________________________________ 3 River stages.____________-________------_-_ 21 Climate.______________________________________ 6 Hydrologic characteristics of aquifers __________ 23 Acknowledgments.--.- _ _-_--_____-_-_-________-_ 7 Definition of terms-_-__-_---------_------__- 23 Well-numbering
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave Valley Conservation Area, 2019 Annual Report
    Mohave Valley Conservation Area 2019 Annual Report May 2021 Work conducted under LCR MSCP Work Task E35 Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program Steering Committee Members Federal Participant Group California Participant Group Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service City of Needles National Park Service Coachella Valley Water District Bureau of Land Management Colorado River Board of California Bureau of Indian Affairs Bard Water District Western Area Power Administration Imperial Irrigation District Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Palo Verde Irrigation District Arizona Participant Group San Diego County Water Authority Southern California Edison Company Arizona Department of Water Resources Southern California Public Power Authority Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Arizona Game and Fish Department California Arizona Power Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District Cibola Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Nevada Participant Group City of Bullhead City City of Lake Havasu City Colorado River Commission of Nevada City of Mesa Nevada Department of Wildlife City of Somerton Southern Nevada Water Authority City of Yuma Colorado River Commission Power Users Electrical District No. 3, Pinal County, Arizona Basic Water Company Golden Shores Water Conservation District Mohave County Water Authority Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Native American Participant Group Mohave Water Conservation District North Gila Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Hualapai Tribe Town of Fredonia Colorado River Indian Tribes Town of Thatcher Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Town of Wickenburg Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Unit “B” Irrigation and Drainage District Conservation Participant Group Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District Yuma County Water Users’ Association Ducks Unlimited Yuma Irrigation District Lower Colorado River RC&D Area, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • November 12, 2017 the Honorable Douglas A. Ducey Governor State
    November 12, 2017 The Honorable Douglas A. Ducey Governor State of Arizona 1700 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement for CAWCD to Acquire Water Rights and Land in Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, Mohave County, Arizona Dear Honorable Douglas A. Ducey: I write to advise you that I am opposed to the proposed Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD) land and water purchase to move Colorado River water, prudently set aside for rural Arizona Colorado River mainstream users, to central Arizona for replenishment. As you may recall, the Mohave County Board of Supervisors passed two resolutions opposing the permanent transfer of any Colorado River Water Rights and Allocations to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District for use in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District – first as to the Quartzsite transfer and second as to the WPI-WAN transfer in the Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District. Here is why I oppose this purchase and transfer of our water: First, as a matter of public policy, 4th Priority Colorado River water allocated to the users on the mainstream of the River, such as Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District (“MVIDD”) in this case, should not be transferred away from mainstream of the River. This is part of the water that the State of Arizona requested be reserved for municipal and industrial uses along the River. Except for that small reservation of 4th Priority Colorado River water to the users on the mainstream, CAWCD received all of Arizona’s Colorado River entitlement remaining at the time that CAWCD and the United States entered into their initial agreement in 1972.
    [Show full text]