DOCSLIB.ORG

Arizona Heritage Trail System Draft Environmental Assessment LC-16-14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arizona Heritage Trail System Draft Environmental Assessment LC-16-14 Arizona Heritage Trail System Draft Environmental Assessment LC-16-14 Lower Colorado Region, Boulder City, NV U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation National Park Service April 2017 Boulder City, NV Arizona Heritage Trail Draft EA LC-16-14 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. Cover Photo: Looking south towards Bullhead City and Laughlin from proposed Heritage Trail System segment south of Davis Camp entrance. Arizona Heritage Trail Draft EA LC-16-14 Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Purpose and Need ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background for the Purpose and Need .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Previous NEPA Documents and Actions ....................................................................... 2 1.4 Related Laws, Policies, and Planning Documents ......................................................... 3 2.0 Description of Alternatives ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Proposed Action Alternative 1 ....................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Trailheads ............................................................................................................ 4 2.2.2 Trails ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 Day-Use Facilities ............................................................................................... 6 2.2.4 Transportation ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2.5 Interpretive Signs ................................................................................................ 7 2.2.6 Fencing ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.7 Utilities ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.8 Operation and Maintenance of the Trail ............................................................. 8 2.2.9 Road closures and Associated Seeding and Native Vegetation Planting ........... 8 2.3 Alternative 2 Trail .......................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Design Features and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................... 8 2.5 Alternatives Considered but Not Evaluated in Detail .................................................. 10 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences .................................................... 18 3.1 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Projects ........................................ 18 3.1.1 Past Projects ...................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2 Present Actions ................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Reasonably Foreseeable Future Projects .......................................................... 19 3.2 Resources Considered but not Discussed Further ........................................................ 19 3.3 Resources Discussed Further ....................................................................................... 20 3.3.1 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gases/Climate Change .............................................. 20 3.3.1.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 21 3.3.1.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Visual Resources ............................................................................................... 23 3.3.2.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 23 3.3.2.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 24 3.3.3.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 24 3.3.3.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 26 3.3.4 Cultural Resources/Traditional Cultural Properties/Sacred Sites ..................... 28 3.3.4.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 28 3.3.4.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 29 3.3.5 Floodplains ........................................................................................................ 30 3.3.5.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 30 3.3.5.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 30 3.3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................... 32 Contents i Arizona Heritage Trail Draft EA LC-16-14 3.3.6.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 32 3.3.6.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 34 3.3.7 Soil .................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.7.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 35 3.3.7.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 35 3.3.8 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ..................................................... 35 3.3.8.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 36 3.3.8.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 37 3.3.9 Recreation ......................................................................................................... 38 3.3.9.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 38 3.3.9.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 38 4.0 Coordination and Consultation .............................................................................................. 40 4.1 Agencies Consulted ...................................................................................................... 40 4.2 National Historic Preservation Act Consultation ......................................................... 40 4.3 Endangered Species Act Consultation ......................................................................... 41 4.4 Scoping/Public Involvement ........................................................................................ 41 5.0 References ............................................................................................................................. 43 6.0 List of Preparers and Contributors ........................................................................................ 47 List of Figures Figure 1- Project Location Map .................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2- Proposed Trail Alternative 1 ......................................................................................... 12 Figure 3- Proposed Trail Alternative 2 ......................................................................................... 13 Figure 4- Mohave Spur Section .................................................................................................... 14 Figure 5- Davis Dam Road and Desert Trail Sections .................................................................. 15 Figure 6- Davis Camp Section ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 7- Laughlin Bullhead City Bridge Section ........................................................................ 17 Figure 8- Wetlands .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Village in the City Historic Markers Lead You To: Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail – a Pre-Civil War Country Estate
    On this self-guided walking tour of Mount Pleasant, Village in the City historic markers lead you to: MOUNT PLEASANT HERITAGE TRAIL – A pre-Civil War country estate. – Homes of musicians Jimmy Dean, Bo Diddley and Charlie Waller. – Senators pitcher Walter Johnson's elegant apartment house. – The church where civil rights activist H. Rap Brown spoke in 1967. – Mount Pleasant's first bodega. – Graceful mansions. – The first African American church on 16th Street. – The path President Teddy Roosevelt took to skinny-dip in Rock Creek Park. Originally a bucolic country village, Mount Pleasant has been a fashion- able streetcar suburb, working-class and immigrant neighborhood, Latino barrio, and hub of arts and activism. Follow this trail to discover the traces left by each succeeding generation and how they add up to an urban place that still feels like a village. Welcome. Visitors to Washington, DC flock to the National Mall, where grand monuments symbolize the nation’s highest ideals. This self-guided walking tour is the seventh in a series that invites you to discover what lies beyond the monuments: Washington’s historic neighborhoods. Founded just after the Civil War, bucolic Mount Pleasant village was home to some of the city’s movers and shakers. Then, as the city grew around it, the village evolved by turn into a fashionable streetcar suburb, a working-class neigh- borhood, a haven for immigrants fleeing political turmoil, a sometimes gritty inner-city area, and the heart of DC’s Latino community. This guide, summariz- ing the 17 signs of Village in the City: Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail, leads you to the sites where history lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathfinder Ecotourism
    pathfinder ecotourism Steinhatchee holds firsthand knowledge of outdoor recreation and tourism. Visitors flock to the community-by-the-Gulf of Mexico in pursuit of scallops, saltwater fish, and outdoor experiences. Local organizations – the Project Board, the Chamber of Commerce, and now the Waterfronts Florida Partnership Committee – maintain What is “ecotourism”? an active calendar of tournaments and festivals to attract tourists and celebrate the natural resources. The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) defines ecotourism as “… responsible travel to natural areas The settlement of 1,300 is located at the southern-most tip of Taylor County in Florida’s that conserves the environment Big Bend along the state’s “Nature Coast.” The community depends on recreational and and improves the well-being of local commercial fishing, related water-based businesses, and in recent years, construction. people” (TIES, 1990). Adjacent waters carry designations such as “Outstanding Florida Waters” and “Big The State of Florida Ecotourism/ Heritage Tourism Advisory Committee Bend Seagrass Aquatic Preserve.” Eco-assets include the Big Bend Saltwater Paddling in 1997 expanded the TIES definition and the Florida Circumnavigational Trail; the Steinhatchee River, the Steinhatchee to include the environment, the host Falls, and the Suwannee River Water Wildlife Management Area. community, and the responsibility and experience of the visitor. The Steinhatchee Waterfronts Florida Partnership Committee identified ecotourism as …Responsible travel to natural areas which conserves the a priority in 2008 with the intent to: environment and sustains the well-being of local people while …seek grant funding opportunities to develop a market feasibility study providing a quality experience to determine what economic development opportunities may exist that connects the visitor to nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Gurung Heritage Trail
    Gurung Heritage Trail https://www.tmgadventure.com/packages/gurung-heritage-trail/ Trips Facts Trip Code: TMG-GT100 Group Size: 1-12 pax Included Meals: Trip Mode: Elevation: 1400 m Accomodation: Transport: 207 Start Point: Kathmandu End Point: Kathmandu Best Season: March, April, May, September, October, November, December Trip Highlights Cultural trek in Nepal A rich ethnical group Life, culture and tradition Mountain people and their daily routine Peaceful and less trekkers route Remote villages and the traditional houses Gurung Heritage Trail takes you to the villages of the Gurung People, the descendants of the Mongolian People, that’s what the history tells if we trace back their origin, and the history book tells that they are brave and served the British Government during the Second World War. They are found in western and eastern Nepal, including central Nepal, such as Kaski, Lamjung, Baglung, Gorkha, and Dhading. But you will visit their villages that are in western Nepal where you will also see lots of mountains, including hills and forests. If you have decided on the Gurung Heritage Trail in 2022, then you can directly fly to Pokhara, the city of lakes, which has the Pokhara International Airport. Thus you will save 2 days, and you do not need to fly to Kathmandu as shown in the itinerary below. The representative of Travel Max Guide will help you to check in a hotel and from there guide you to the final destination of the Gurung Heritage Trail. Travel Insurance Travel Insurance is a must because you are trekking near the mountains at an altitude of more than 3000 m.
    [Show full text]
  • November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement F
    From: Karen Summitt To: Thomas Buschatzke; Sharon Scantlebury Subject: Fw: Objections to the MVIDD Water Transfer Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:24:42 PM Attachments: ADWR Letter.docx November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement for CAWCD to Acquire Water Rights and Land in Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, Mohave County, Arizona Dear Thomas Buschatzkle, I write to advise you that I am opposed to the proposed Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD) land and water purchase to move Colorado River water, prudently set aside for rural Arizona Colorado River mainstream users, to central Arizona for replenishment. As you may recall, the Mohave County Board of Supervisors passed two resolutions opposing the permanent transfer of any Colorado River Water Rights and Allocations to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District for use in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District – first as to the Quartzsite transfer and second as to the WPI-WAN transfer in the Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District. Here is why I oppose this purchase and transfer of our water: First, as a matter of public policy, 4th Priority Colorado River water allocated to the users on the mainstream of the River, such as Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District (“MVIDD”) in this case, should not be transferred away from mainstream of the River. This is part of the water that the State of Arizona requested be reserved for municipal and industrial uses along the River. Except for that small reservation of 4th Priority Colorado River water to the users on the mainstream, CAWCD received all of Arizona’s Colorado River entitlement remaining at the time that CAWCD and the United States entered into their initial agreement in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Projects
    PROJECTS COMPLETED BY PROLOGUE DC HISTORIANS Mara Cherkasky This Place Has A Voice, Canal Park public art project, consulting historian, http://www.thisplacehasavoice.info The Hotel Harrington: A Witness to Washington DC's History Since 1914 (brochure, 2014) An East-of-the-River View: Anacostia Heritage Trail (Cultural Tourism DC, 2014) Remembering Georgetown's Streetcar Era: The O and P Streets Rehabilitation Project (exhibit panels and booklet documenting the District Department of Transportation's award-winning streetcar and pavement-preservation project, 2013) The Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia: The First 100 Years (exhibit panels and PowerPoint presentations, 2013) Historic Park View: A Walking Tour (booklet, Park View United Neighborhood Coalition, 2012) DC Neighborhood Heritage Trail booklets: Village in the City: Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail (2006); Battleground to Community: Brightwood Heritage Trail (2008); A Self-Reliant People: Greater Deanwood Heritage Trail (2009); Cultural Convergence: Columbia Heights Heritage Trail (2009); Top of the Town: Tenleytown Heritage Trail (2010); Civil War to Civil Rights: Downtown Heritage Trail (2011); Lift Every Voice: Georgia Avenue/Pleasant Plains Heritage Trail (2011); Hub, Home, Heart: H Street NE Heritage Trail (2012); and Make No Little Plans: Federal Triangle Heritage Trail (2012) “Mount Pleasant,” in Washington at Home: An Illustrated History of Neighborhoods in the Nation's Capital (Kathryn Schneider Smith, editor, Johns Hopkins Press, 2010) Mount
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Neck Heritage Trail Bicycling Route Network
    Northern Neck Heritage Trail Bicycling Route Network Connecting People and Places Places of Interest Loop Tours Reedville-Colonial Beach Route Belle Isle State Park Located on the Rappahannock River, Dahlgren The Northern Neck Heritage Trail Bicycling Reedville and Reedville Fishermen’s Museum Walk this the park includes hiking trails, campsites (with water and Heritage Route network is a segment of the Potomac Heri- fisherman’s village and admire the stately sea captains’ electricity), a modern bath house, a guest house for over- Barnesfield Museum Park tage National Scenic Trail, a developing network homes. Learn about the Chesapeake Bay “deadrise” fish- night rental, a camp store, and kayak, canoe, bicycle and 301 ing boats and sail on an historic skipjack. Enjoy the muse- motor boat rentals. www.virginiastateparks.gov of trails between the broad, gently flowing Po- um galleries. www.rfmuseum.org Caledon Owens tomac River as it empties into the Chesapeake Menokin (c. 1769) Home of Francis Lightfoot Lee, signer State Park DAHLGREN Bay and the Allegheny Highlands in western Vir-Mar Beach A small sandy beach on the Potomac of- of the Declaration of Independence. Visitors center de- 218 fering strolling, relaxing, and birding opportunities. On picting architectural conservation, hiking trails on a 325 Pennsylvania. The “braided” Trail network offers clear days, the Smith Island Lighthouse can be seen, as acre wildlife refuge. www.menokin.org well as the shores of Maryland. www.dgif.virginia.gov/ opportunities for hiking, bicycling, paddling, Oak Crest C Mary Ball Washington Museum & Library Named in M H vbwt/siteasp?trail=1&loop=CNN&site=CNN10 A 206 Winery A horseback riding and cross-country skiing.
    [Show full text]
  • F CHAPTER FIVE Cultural Heri
    Chapter Five: Cultural Heritage Management in Malaysia Chapter One: Chapter Two: Introduction Methodology Chapter Three: Chapter Four: Chapter Five: Chapter Six: Background to Malaysia Community Involvement in Cultural Cultural Heritage Management in Fieldwork Results Heritage Management Malaysia Chapter Seven: Chapter Eight: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendation CHAPTER FIVE CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIA 5.0 Introduction This chapter is to explore and discuss the understanding of heritage as a term. The context of this understanding is incorporated with the notion of authenticity towards heritage resources and their management. Certainly, the authenticity of heritage resources is one of the main characters and a qualifying condition for inscription of UNESCO World Heritage Site. The authenticity is critically important for managing and improving conservation activity on the cultural heritage resources. Therefore, with regard to finding a strategy suitable to implementing cultural heritage management whilst retaining and highlighting the authenticity of heritage resources, the concept of the heritage trail development has been viewed as an appropriate management tool to conform with and implement both conservation and tourism requirements. Besides, with respect to local community involvement towards cultural heritage management, the Melaka heritage trail will be used as a preference to examine the current constitutional framework developed by the Malaysian government in order to understand how and whether the local community is engaged. 129 Chapter Five: Cultural Heritage Management in Malaysia 5.1 Conceptualising the Definitions of Heritage According to the web dictionary of Oxford (2012), the word heritage means “a property that is or may be inherited”. This is further refined, based on three crucial characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Newberry/Dead Mountains Scenic Backcountry Drive the 10-Mile One-Way Drive Is on Bureau of Land Management Public Lands
    Newberry/Dead Mountains Scenic Backcountry Drive The 10-mile one-way drive is on Bureau of Land Management public lands. However, it is better to take this as a loop trail (see directions) so you don’t have to backtrack and can see other attractions. Although the road is gravel, it is in good condition and can be navigated by 2-wheel drive sedan vehicles, although high clearance is preferable. This particular scenic drive offers a wide range of vistas. Looking north are the Newberry Mountains with the prominent and sacred Spirit Mountain looming above the horizon. Looking south are the Dead Moun- tains which are also sacred to the native Indian tribes in the area. To the west are the granitic crystal hills with interesting rock formations. To the east is the Colorado River Valley and the high peaks of the Hualapai Range in Arizona as backdrop. The green fields along the Colorado River in this area are part of the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. The Fort Mojave Indian Reservation covers nearly 42,000 acres in the tri-state area of Arizona, California, and Nevada. The Mojave Indians are Pipa Aha Macav — “The People By The River.” Mojave culture traces the earthly origins of its people to Spirit Mountain. Newberry Mountains Newberry Mountains Prior to the arrival of white settler to the region, the Mojave Indians were prosperous farmers with well- established villages and trade networks that stretched as far away as the Pacific Ocean. In the 16th Century, the time the Spanish arrived in the territory, the Mojave’s were the largest concentration of people in the Southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Low-Angle Normal Faulting and Dike Emplacement, Homer Mountain and Surrounding Areas, Southeastern California and Southernmost Nevada
    Miocene low-angle normal faulting and dike emplacement, Homer Mountain and surrounding areas, southeastern California and southernmost Nevada JON E. SPENCER* U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefleld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT tions, differed radically from the state of that collectively accommodated as much as 50% stress in the upper plate, as inferred from to 100% extension of upper-plate rocks (Ander- Homer Mountain and surrounding regions fault geometry. Low-angle faulting and east- son, 1971). In many areas, normal faults within are within, or adjacent to, the western part of northeast-west-southwest distension of up- upper-plate rocks merge with, or are truncated a broad region of low-angle normal faults ex- per-plate rocks reflect regional reduction of by, a basal, subhorizontal fault often referred to posed within the lower Colorado River compression in the east-northeast-west- as a "detachment fault" (for example, see Davis trough. During middle Miocene time, upper- southwest direction and associated large- and others, 1980). The term "detachment fault" plate rocks in the Homer, Sacramento, Dead, scale east-northeast-west-southwest crustal is used here to indicate a low-angle normal fault and Newberry Mountains moved eastward or extension. In contrast, concave-upward flex- that formed at a low angle (for example, Wer- northeastward, relative to the lower plate, ure of the lower plate, in response to tectonic nicke and others, 1984; Reynolds and Spsncer, above single or multiple low-angle normal denudation and resultant isostatic uplift, is in- 1985). The interpretation that detachment faults faults. Deposition of coarse clastic sedimen- ferred to have produced local subhorizontal are rooted faults that accommodate crustal ex- tary rocks occurred during extensional fault- compression at shallow crustal levels in the tension (Wernicke, 1981; Howard and John, ing and was accompanied by, and closely lower plate that overwhelmed the regional 1983; Davis and others, 1983; Allmendinger followed by, eruption of basaltic volcanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Resorts & Recreation
    National Park Service: Resorts and Recreation RESORTS & RECREATION An Historic Theme Study of the New Jersey Heritage Trail Route RESORTS & RECREATION MENU an Historic Theme Study of the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail Route Contents The Atlantic Shore: Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Burlington, Atlantic, and Cape May Counties Methodology Chapter 1 Early Resorts Chapter 2 Railroad Resorts Chapter 3 Religious Resorts Chapter 4 The Boardwalk Chapter 5 Roads and Roadside Attractions Chapter 6 Resort Development in the Twentieth Century Appendix A Existing Documentation Bibliography Sarah Allaback, Editor Chuck Milliken, Layout, Design, & Contributing Editor http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/nj1/index.htm[11/15/2013 2:48:32 PM] National Park Service: Resorts and Recreation 1995 The Sandy Hook Foundation, Inc. and National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail Route Mauricetown, New Jersey History | Links to the Past | National Park Service | Search | Contact Top Last Modified: Mon, Jan 10 2005 10:00:00 pm PDT http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/nj1/index.htm http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/nj1/index.htm[11/15/2013 2:48:32 PM] National Park Service: Resorts and Recreation (Table of Contents) RESORTS & RECREATION An Historic Theme Study of the New Jersey Heritage Trail Route MENU CONTENTS COVER Contents Cover photograph: Beach Avenue, Cape May, NJ. "As early as 1915, parking at beach areas was beginning to be a problem. In the background Methodology is "Pavilion No. 1' Pier. This picture was taken from the Stockton Bath House area, revealing a full spectrum of summer afternoon seaside attire." Chapter 1 Courtesy May County Historical and Genealogical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mohave County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Background and Scope ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Assurances ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Mohave County ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bullhead City ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Colorado City ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Kingman ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Lake
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 As Amended
    the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as amended U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Desert District Riverside, California the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as Amended IN REPLY REFER TO United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT STATE OFFICE Federal Office Building 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Reader: Thank you.You and many other interested citizens like you have made this California Desert Conservation Area Plan. It was conceived of your interests and concerns, born into law through your elected representatives, molded by your direct personal involvement, matured and refined through public conflict, interaction, and compromise, and completed as a result of your review, comment and advice. It is a good plan. You have reason to be proud. Perhaps, as individuals, we may say, “This is not exactly the plan I would like,” but together we can say, “This is a plan we can agree on, it is fair, and it is possible.” This is the most important part of all, because this Plan is only a beginning. A plan is a piece of paper-what counts is what happens on the ground. The California Desert Plan encompasses a tremendous area and many different resources and uses. The decisions in the Plan are major and important, but they are only general guides to site—specific actions. The job ahead of us now involves three tasks: —Site-specific plans, such as grazing allotment management plans or vehicle route designation; —On-the-ground actions, such as granting mineral leases, developing water sources for wildlife, building fences for livestock pastures or for protecting petroglyphs; and —Keeping people informed of and involved in putting the Plan to work on the ground, and in changing the Plan to meet future needs.
    [Show full text]