DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Performance Reviews Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ROMANIA UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2001 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 13 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.01-II-E.28 ISBN 92-1-116795-7 ISSN iii ___________________________________________________________________________ Preface The Environmental Performance Review of Romania began with a preparatory mission in April 2000, during which the structure of the report was established. Thereafter, the review team of international experts was constituted. It included experts from Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, together with experts from the secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the European Centre for Environment and Health of the World Health Organization (WHO). The review mission took place in October 2000. A first draft of the EPR report was submitted to the country for updating in March 2001. In September 2001, the draft was submitted for consideration to the EPR Expert Group of the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy. During this meeting, the Expert Group discussed the report in detail with representatives of the Romanian Government, focusing in particular on the conclusions and recommendations. The EPR report, as amended by the Expert Group, was then submitted for peer review to the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy at its annual session in Geneva on 25-26 September 2001. A high-level delegation from the Government of Romania participated in the peer review. The Committee adopted the recommendations as set out in this report. The review of Romania’s environmental performance is evidence of the effort that the country is devoting towards EU accession and the approximation of its legislation. This legislative process has accelerated substantially in the recent past, particularly in the area of environment. Environment-related strategies and action plans, begun before the approximation process, have been reinforced during it. However, the report also points out a number of shortcomings in implementation and enforcement, and it calls for improving cooperation among all ministries and other key partners that have competencies and responsibilities in environment management and protection. The UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy and the UNECE review team wish Romania success in carrying out the tasks before it to meet its environmental objectives, including implementation of the recommendations contained in the present report. UNECE would also like to express its deep appreciation to the Governments of Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom for their support, and to the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization for participating in this Environmental Performance Review. iv LIST OF TEAM MEMBERS Ms. Catherine MASSON (ECE secretariat) Project Leader Mr. René NIJENHUIS (ECE secretariat) Project Coordinator Mr. René NIJENHUIS (ECE secretariat) Introduction Ms. Vanya GRIGOROVA (BULGARIA) Chapter 1 Mr. Bart CLAASSEN (NETHERLANDS) Chapter 2 Mr. Arne Wieldandt JACOBSEN (DENMARK) Chapter 3 Ms. Michelle DOBRE (FRANCE) Chapter 4 Mr. Harold EGERER (UNEP) Chapter 5 Ms. Katarina MAGULOVA (SLOVAKIA) Chapter 6 Mr. Pavel BLASZCZYK (POLAND) Chapter 7 Mr. Ivan NARKEVITCH (ECE secretariat) Chapter 8 Mr. Ljubco MELOVSKI (TFYR OF MACEDONIA) Chapter 9 Ms. Karin REQUIA (BRAZIL) Chapter 10 Ms. Elisabeth CLÉMENT-ARNOLD (SWITZERLAND) Chapter 11 Mr. Stefan ANDERSSON (SWEDEN) Chapter 12 Mr. Hans AAROE (DENMARK) Chapter 13 Mr. Michal KRZYZANOWSKI (WHO-ECEH) Chapter 14 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The preparatory mission for the project took place from 17 to 19 April 2000. The review mission was organized from 17 to 26 October 2000. An updating mission took place in Bucharest from 26 to 30 March 2001. The Peer review was held on 25-26 September 2001 in Geneva. The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy adopted the recommendations set out in this publication. The Environmental Performance Review is a programme of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Division for Environment and Human Settlements. The Team Leader is Mary Pat Silveira. Information cut-off date: 28 September 2001. v CONTENTS List of figures ......................................................................................................................................... viii List of tables............................................................................................................................................... x List of boxes ............................................................................................................................................. xii Abbreviations, symbols and measures ................................................................................................. xiii Currency ................................................................................................................................................. xvi INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 – 6 I.1 Geography.................................................................. 1 I.2 People and demography ..................................................... 3 I.3 Economy ................................................................... 4 I.4 Institutions.................................................................. 5 PART I: ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Chapter 1: Legal and policy framework, institutional arrangements and environmental regulations ................................................... 9 - 24 1.1 Legal framework for environmental protection ................................................... 9 1.2 Objectives of the environmental policy ............................................................. 10 1.3 Institutional arrangements ..................................................14 1.4 Environmental regulations.................................................. 17 1.5 Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 21 Chapter 2: Spatial planning ............................................................................................................ 25-34 2.1 The framework for territorial development........................................................ 25 2.2 Spatial planning policies and strategies ............................................................. 26 2.3 Related legislation, institutions and the planning system .................................. 29 2.4 Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 31 Chapter 3: Economic instruments and privatization – their impact on environmental protection ...................................................................................... 35 - 46 3.1 Economic instruments and their impact on environmental protection............... 35 3.2 Privatization and its impact on environmental protection.................................. 41 3.3 Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 44 Chapter 4: Environmental information and public participation in decision-making ...................................................................................................... 47 - 56 4.1 Environmental awareness in Romanian civil society......................................... 47 4.2 Environmental information................................................................................ 47 4.3 Public participation in environmental policies and procedures ......................... 49 4.4 Environmental education, research and training................................................ 52 4.5 Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 52 vi Chapter 5: International cooperation ..................................................................................57 - 67 5.1 International cooperation to protect the environment and strengthen institutions ............................................................................... 57 5.2 Cooperation on global environmental issues ..................................................... 58 5.3 Regional and bilateral cooperation .................................................................... 61 5.4 Main international donors and partners.............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Climbing & Hiking in Bicaz Gorges National Park

    Climbing & Hiking in Bicaz Gorges National Park

    UIAA Romanian Federation of Mountaineering and Climbing YOUTH COMMISSION Romanian Mountain Club INTERNATIONAL YOUTH CAMP IN ROMANIAN CARPATHIANS CLIMBING & HIKING IN BICAZ GORGES NATIONAL PARK August 11-18, 2007 Location: A climbing paradise in a superb natural landscape and a traditional rural ambiance. Near the impressive Red Lake, in the famous deep gorges sculptured in Mesozoic limestone rocks there are over 200 climbing routes, bolted or classic, UIAA grade 3 to 10, 1 to 15 pitches, 15m to 300m high. Access and way down are short and easy. The first route (grade 4) was established in 1934 on the elegant Altar Tower. The area was designated a national park and the climbing (free, artificial or mixed), hiking and trekking here are unique. Accommodation and Board: The ECOLOG Hut (‘Cabana Ecolog’), alt. 700m, good conditions, full-board. The hut is a new mountain base of The Romanian Federation and is runned by staff of the affiliated Romanian Mountain Club. There is no need for tents, mats or stoves. Your own sleeping bag is not a must. If you are a vegetarian please let us know in advance. Int’l telephone, e-mail and Internet access available at the hut. Management and coaching: It will be a camp director (not a bad guy, don’t worry) and experienced qualified instructors from the national federation. You are expected to give a hand and assist with current organization. Local transportation and transfers: Provided by us (minibus, 4 WD). Programme: at least 4 days climbing & hiking, 1 day mountain walking/hiking/climbing (Ceahlau Mt. national park, alt.1907m), 1 day (optional) cultural round trip to the city of Piatra Neamt (capital of Neamt county), Moldavian mediaeval monasteries, Bistrita valley and the 40 km length Bicaz Lake.
  • Leon Degrelle

    Leon Degrelle

    Hitler, Born at Versailles June 18, 2012 1 Introduction For most Americans the globe-girdling catastrophe that we call the Second World War is now a matter neither of personal experience nor of memory, but of wood pulp and celluloid, books and films. Larger still is the majority for whom the cataclysmic First World War - once spoken of as "The Great War" - is ancient history, an antic prelude to what those who participated in it sometimes like to call "The Big One." For most of us, perhaps, the two wars compare as do contrasting movies from the two eras. Our image of the First World War is brief, grainy, silent, with black-and-white, herky-jerky doughboys "going over the top"; we picture the Second as panoramic, technicolor, reverberating with stereophonic sound and fury, armadas of ships and planes and tanks sweeping forward to destiny. A further disparity may be found in the popular historical and political as- sessment, such as it is, of the two wars. The majority of Americans doubtless still believes that the key to the Second World War is a simple one: a.demonic megalomaniac, Adolf Hitler, rose up to lead Germany to world domination and instead led his people to well-deserved ruin. Yet the view of the First World War held by the Americans of today, it is safe to say, is rather more tepid than the white-hot feelings of many of their grandparents in 1917, when "100- per-cent Americans" agitated to "Hang the Kaiser!" and mobs sacked German newspaper offices and presses in the worst outbreak of ethnic bigotry in our country’s history.
  • Braşov Highway on the Economic and Functional Structure of Human Settlements

    Braşov Highway on the Economic and Functional Structure of Human Settlements

    ROMANIAN REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, Volume VII, Number 1, 2011 FORECAST FOR THE IMPACT OF BUCHAREST – BRA ŞOV HIGHWAY ON THE ECONOMIC AND FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE 1 OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS IN ILFOV COUNTY CĂTĂLINA CÂRSTEA 2, FLORENTINA ION 3, PETRONELA NOV ĂCESCU 4 ABSTRACT - One of the most publicized issues concerning the infrastructure of Romania is the Bucharest-Bra şov highway. The long-awaited project aims to streamline the traffic between the Capital and the central part of the country, representing the central area of the Pan - European Road Corridor IV. The length of the highway on the territory of Ilfov County is 31 km, representing 17% of the total length of Bucharest- Bra şov highway. The start of the highway will have strong effects on economic structure and on the way the Bucharest Metropolitan Area will work. We can expect an increase in the disparities between the settlements of Ilfov County. This pattern is also observable on the Bucharest- Ploie şti corridor where, in recent years, much of the Ilfov county's economic activities have migrated to the north, especially along that corridor. Besides economic migration, intense residential migration followed the Bucharest – Ploie şti corridor, residents of the Bucharest itself moving out to the north of Ilfov County. Probably, the future Bucharest – Bra şov highway will lead to an increased suburbanization and periurbanization, this in turn giving way to the crowding of the area by businesses eager to have access to the highway. This project will likely increase the gap between north and south of Ilfov County. In addition to changes that may occur at the county level, changes will also have an impact on the localities themselves since the areas located near the highway will have an economic and demographic growth rate superior to more remote areas.
  • Primaria Comunei Sabaoani Numele Cetateanului: SC BRILIANT

    Primaria Comunei Sabaoani Numele Cetateanului: SC BRILIANT

    1/09.01.2015 Primaria: Primaria comunei Sabaoani Numele cetateanului: S.C. BRILIANT S.R.L. - reprezentant CIMPOIEŞU LUCIAN Scopul solicitarii: amplasare instalatie distributie GPL tip SKID - in sat/comuna Săbăoani Autorizatie: construire 2/12.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei D-va Rosie Numele cetateanului: SC PEGEXIM SRL Scopul solicitarii: CONSTRUIRE HALĂ LOGISTICĂ ( COLETĂRIE) Autorizatie: construire 3/13.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Borca Numele cetateanului: COMUNA BORCA Scopul solicitarii: EXTINDERE CĂMIN CULTURAL BORCA CU SPAŢIU CEREMONII Autorizatie: construire 4/21.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Razboieni Numele cetateanului: SC DULHAN LEMOB PROD COM SRL Scopul solicitarii: DEMOLARE SI RECONSTRUIRE SPATII FINISAJ Autorizatie: construire 5/22.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Borlesti Numele cetateanului: MANASTIREA NECHIT Scopul solicitarii: SALA DE MEDITATIE CU REGIM DE INALTIME P+1E Autorizatie: construire 6/23.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Ion Creanga Numele cetateanului: COMUNA ION CREANGĂ Scopul solicitarii: AMENAJARE PARCUL TEIULUI ÎN SATUL ION CREANGĂ Autorizatie: construire 7/26.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Borlesti Numele cetateanului: MĂNĂSTIREA NECHIT Scopul solicitarii: PARACLIS CU REGIM DE ÎNĂLTIME P+1E+M Autorizatie: construire 8/26.01.2015 Primaria: Primaria comunei Poiana Teiului Numele cetateanului: ILIE Gr. ION Scopul solicitarii: construire " Pensiune turistica, anexe camping-uri, imprejmuire- gard, bazin vidanjabil si racord la utilitati prin modificare de tema proiect - autorizat prin A.C. nr. 4 /30.05.2012 Autorizatie: construire 9/27.01.2015 Primaria: primaria comunei Negresti Numele cetateanului: comuna NEGRESTI Scopul solicitarii: MODERNIZRE RETEA STRADALA NEGRESTI- STR. BISERICUTA Autorizatie: construire 10/27.01.2015 Primaria: SC AVCON STORE SRL Numele cetateanului: SC AVCON STORE SRL Scopul solicitarii: Construire spatiu comercial materiale de constructii si sediu firma, imprejmuire si racord la utilitati prin modificare de tema proiect autorizat prin AC nr.
  • Breviar Turism Neamt – 2019

    Breviar Turism Neamt – 2019

    INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL DE STATISTICĂ DIRECŢIA REGIONALĂ DE STATISTICĂ NEAMŢ INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL DE STATISTICĂ DIRECŢIA REGIONALĂ DE STATISTICĂ NEAMŢ TURISMUL JUDEŢULUI NEAMŢ JUDEŢUL NEAMŢ Piatra Neamţ, Str.Locotenent Drăghescu nr.7 Tel. 0233-213206 e-mail : [email protected] www.neamt.insse.ro Direcţia Regională de Statistică Neamţ ❖ Reproducerea conţinutului acestei publicaţii, integrală sau parţială, în forma originală sau modificată, precum şi stocarea într-un sistem de regăsire sau transmiterea sub orice formă şi prin orice mijloace sunt interzise fără autorizarea scrisă a Direcţiei Regionale de Statistică Neamţ ❖ Utilizarea conţinutului acestei publicaţii, cu titlu explicativ sau justificativ, în articole, studii, cărţi este autorizată numai cu indicarea clară şi precisă a sursei. CCUUPPRRIINNSS ▪ Judeţul Neamţ – Prezentare generală 3 8 CAP.1 GEOGRAFIA ŞI ORGANIZAREA ADMINISTRATIV-TERITORIALĂ 1.1 Poziţia geografică a judeţului 9 1.2 Lungimea hotarelor 9 1.3 Principalele cursuri de apă 9 1.4 Principalele lacuri 10 1.5 Principalele altitudini muntoase 10 1.6 Organizarea administrativă a judeţului 10 1.7 Suprafaţa, populaţia, numărul satelor şi localităţilor componente pe municipii, oraşe şi 11 comune 13 CAP.2 CAPACITATEA DE CAZARE TURISTICĂ 2.1 Structurile de primire turistică cu funcţiuni de cazare turistică şi capacitatea de 14 cazare turistică, pe tipuri de structuri, în perioada 2014 - 2018 2.1.1 Număr structuri de primire turistică cu funcţiuni de cazare turistică 14 2.1.2 Capacitatea de cazare turistică existentă ( instalată )
  • Strategia De Dezvoltare Economică Şi Socială a Judeţului Suceava, Perioada 2011 – 2020

    Strategia De Dezvoltare Economică Şi Socială a Judeţului Suceava, Perioada 2011 – 2020

    UNIUNEA EUROPEANĂ GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI Inovaţie în administraţie Fondul Social European Ministerul Administraţiei şi Programul Operaţional Internelor "Dezvoltarea Capacităţii Administrative” STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE ECONOMICĂ ŞI SOCIALĂ A JUDEŢULUI SUCEAVA, PERIOADA 2011 – 2020 Proiect cofinanțat din Fondul Social European, prin Programul Operațional “Dezvoltarea Capacității Administrative” 1 CUPRINS SECŢIUNEA A. CADRUL DE REFERINŢĂ – Evaluarea situaţiei existente din punct de vedere socio - economic, al mediului şi al nivelului de echipare tehnică şi socială în judeţul Suceava ................................................ 4 CAPITOLUL I. CADRUL NATURAL............................................................................................................................... 4 I.1. Aşezarea geografică. Frontiere ....................................................................................................................... 4 I.2. Suprafaţa ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 I.3. Populaţia ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 I.4. Unităţile administrativ-teritoriale .................................................................................................................. 4 I.5. Reţeaua hidrografică ......................................................................................................................................
  • “Geothermal Energy in Ilfov County - Romania”

    “Geothermal Energy in Ilfov County - Romania”

    Ilfov County Council “Geothermal energy in Ilfov County - Romania” Ionut TANASE Ilfov County Council October, 2019 Content Ilfov County Council 1. Geothermal resources in Romania 2. Geothermal resources in Bucharest-Ilfov Region 3. Project “Harnessing geothermal water resources for district heating the Emergency Hospital «Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu», Balotesti Commune, Ilfov County” 4. Project “The development of geothermal potential in the counties of Ilfov and Bihor” 5. Project ELI-NP (GSHP) 6. Possible future project in Ilfov County Romania Geothermal resources in Romania Ilfov County Council • The research for geothermal resources for energy purposes began in the early 60’s based on a detailed geological programme for hydrocarbon resources. • The geothermal potential - low-temperature geothermal systems • porous permeable formations such as the Pannonian sandstone, and siltstones specific (Western Plain, Olt Valley) or in fractured carbonate formations (Oradea, Bors and North Bucharest (Otopeni) areas). • First well for geothermal utilisation in Romania (Felix SPA Bihor) was drilled in 1885 to a depth of 51 m, yielding hot water of 49°C, maximum flow rate 195 l/s. • Since then over 250 wells have been drilled with a depth range of 800- 3,500 m, through which were discovered low-enthalpy geothermal resources with a temperature between 40 and 120°C. • The total installed capacity of the existing wells in Romania is about 480 MWth (for a reference temperature of 25°C). UCRAINE Ilfov County Council MOLDAVIA HUNGARY SATU-MARE CHIŞINĂU Acas
  • Diversity of Alien Macroinvertebrate Species in Serbian Waters

    Diversity of Alien Macroinvertebrate Species in Serbian Waters

    water Article Diversity of Alien Macroinvertebrate Species in Serbian Waters Katarina Zori´c* , Ana Atanackovi´c,Jelena Tomovi´c,Božica Vasiljevi´c,Bojana Tubi´c and Momir Paunovi´c Department for Hydroecology and Water Protection, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stankovi´c”—NationalInstitute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (J.T.); [email protected] (B.V.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: This article provides the first comprehensive list of alien macroinvertebrate species registered and/or established in aquatic ecosystems in Serbia as a potential threat to native biodiversity. The list comprised field investigations, articles, grey literature, and unpublished data. Twenty-nine species of macroinvertebrates have been recorded since 1942, with a domination of the Ponto-Caspian faunistic elements. The majority of recorded species have broad distribution and are naturalized in the waters of Serbia, while occasional or single findings of seven taxa indicate that these species have failed to form populations. Presented results clearly show that the Danube is the main corridor for the introduction and spread of non-native species into Serbia. Keywords: Serbia; inland waters; allochthonous species; introduction 1. Introduction The Water Framework Directive (WFD) [1] represents key regulation and one of the most important documents in the European Union water legislation since it was adopted in 2000.
  • Harmonizing State- and EU-Funded Projects in Regions | Final Synthesis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

    Harmonizing State- and EU-Funded Projects in Regions | Final Synthesis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

    Public Disclosure Authorized Harmonizing STATE- AND EU-FUNDED PROJECTS in Regions | Final Synthesis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Agreement for Harmonizing State- and EU-funded Final Investment Programs Romania Regional Development Program 2 Synthesis Dated November 26, 2015 Project co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme Technical Assistance (OPTA) 2007-2013 Agreement for Advisory Services on Assistance to the Romanian Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration on Harmonizing State- and EU- funded Projects in Regions Final Synthesis November 26, 2015 Romania Regional Development Program 2 4 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Boxes .............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ v Sumary ........................................................................................................................................................
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
  • Waste Management in the Ilfov County

    Waste Management in the Ilfov County

    Results of the Transferability Study for the Implementation of the “LET’S DO IT WITH FERDA” Good Practice in the Ilfov County Brussels, 7 November 2012 Communication and education Workshop This project is cofinanced by the ERDF and made possible by the INTERREG IVC programme 1 WASTE PREVENTION IN ROMANIA • The National Waste Management Strategy and Plan the basic instruments that ensure the implementation of the EU waste management policy in Romania. • The National Waste Management Plan and Strategy cover all the types of waste (municipal and production) and establish four groups of objectives: – overall strategic objectives for waste management; – strategic objectives for specific waste streams (agricultural waste, waste from the production of heat and electricity, incineration and co- incineration, construction and demolition waste, waste from treatment plants, biodegradable waste, packaging waste, used tires, end of life vehicles (ELV), waste electrical and electronic equipment (DEEE)); – overall strategic objectives for the management of hazardous waste; – strategic objectives for specific hazardous waste streams. This project is cofinanced by the ERDF and made possible by the INTERREG IVC programme 2 WASTE PREVENTION IN ROMANIA (2) – SOP ENVIRONMENT • The overall objective of Sectorial Operational Program ENVIRONMENT to "protect and improve the environment and quality of life in Romania, focusing in particular on observing the environmental acquis". • A specific goal the "development of sustainable waste management systems by
  • RAPORT PRIVIND FINANȚELE PUBLICE LOCALE PE ANUL 2019 La Nivelul Județului NEAMȚ

    RAPORT PRIVIND FINANȚELE PUBLICE LOCALE PE ANUL 2019 La Nivelul Județului NEAMȚ

    RAPORT PRIVIND FINANȚELE PUBLICE LOCALE PE ANUL 2019 la nivelul județului NEAMȚ I. Prezentare generală 1. Sfera și competențele de activitate Curtea de Conturi, în calitate de instituție supremă de audit, are misiunea de a susține promovarea responsabilității, a corectitudinii și gestionarea performantă a resurselor publice în scopul consolidării managementului financiar în România și de a raporta Parlamentului despre modul în care au fost utilizate resursele publice în exercițiul bugetar expirat. Potrivit legii de organizare și funcționare, Curtea de Conturi este singura instituție competentă să certifice acuratețea și veridicitatea datelor cuprinse în situațiile financiare, asigurându-se că: - situațiile financiare ale instituțiilor/autorităților verificate nu conțin denaturări semnificative, fapt ce îi permite exprimarea unei opinii cu privire la măsura în care acestea sunt întocmite în conformitate cu cadrul legal de raportare financiară aplicabil în România, respectă principiile legalității și regularității și oferă o imagine fidelă a poziției financiare, a performanței financiare și a altor informații referitoare la activitatea desfășurată de entitățile care intră în competența de auditare; - modul de administrare a patrimoniului și execuția bugetului de venituri și cheltuieli sunt în concordanță cu scopul, obiectivele și atribuțiile prevăzute în actele normative de înființare a instituțiilor/autorităților verificate și respectă principiile legalității, regularității, economicității, eficienței și eficacității. Camera de Conturi Neamț – structură de specialitate a Curții de Conturi a Românei la nivel teritorial, realizează pe teritoriul județului Neamț funcția de audit asupra modului de formare, de administrare și de întrebuințare a resurselor financiare ale statului și ale sectorului public, precum și auditul performanței asupra bugetului general consolidat și a oricăror altor fonduri publice.