DOCSLIB.ORG

Minimizing Impediments to Design for Construction Safety (DFCS) Implementation on Capital Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minimizing Impediments to Design for Construction Safety (DFCS) Implementation on Capital Projects Minimizing Impediments to Design for Construction Safety (DFCS) Implementation on Capital Projects Dissertation PhD AECM (Architecture-Engineering-Construction-Management) MUSTAPHA A. BELLO School of Architecture College of Fine Arts Carnegie Mellon University Date Submitted: April 30, 2012 Advisory Committee Chair: Prof. Omer Akin School of Architecture Carnegie Mellon University Prof. Burcu Akinci Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Prof. Chimay Anumba Department of Architectural Engineering Pennsylvania State University – University Park Copyright Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. I authorize Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I authorize Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Mustapha A. Bello Copyright © Mustapha A. Bello, 2012. All rights reserved. This dissertation document is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture-Engineering-Construction- Management. II Abstract The construction industry is notorious for having one of the worst safety records among all industries in the private sector (Bentil, 1990; and Behm, 2005). In the United States, the industry accounts for up to 18% of work-related deaths and 15% of all worker compensation cases with approximately 1,000 construction workers killed annually (BLS, 2000-2009). Towards minimizing safety hazards and incidents, construction companies employ several strategies including safety planning, staffing and training among many others (CII, 2003). Different strategies apply to different project phases. However, as the early identification and elimination of potential safety hazards is not only more effective but cheaper (Behm 2005; and Anumba, 1999), those strategies applicable to the earlier project phases are likely to have a more significant impact in improving construction worker safety. One of such strategies, Design for Construction Safety (DFCS), has the ability to function effectively in the current Architecture/Engineering/Construction (AEC) industry environment without requiring any major changes in procedure or contractual structure. DFCS is the explicit consideration of construction worker safety in the design of a project (Toole and Gambatese, 2008). Besides the ultimate benefit of decreasing site safety hazards, DFCS, through the proactive identification and elimination of hazards is safer and more cost effective than reactive management of the same hazards (Toole and Gambatese, 2008). The most critical impediments to DFCS include designers' concern about increased liability, increased cost, and designers' lack of safety expertise. Others include concerns about schedule problems, diminished design creativity, and designers’ lack of interest (Gambatese et al, 2005). To assist designers in DFCS implementation, safety researchers sponsored by the Construction Industry Institute (CII) developed over 400 design suggestions to minimize or eliminate certain construction safety hazards (Gambatese et al, 1997). These suggestions were incorporated in a computer program, the DFCS Toolbox. Besides this, other research has been conducted and guidelines developed to aid DFCS implementation. III However, as DFCS is still experiencing limited application (Toole and Gambatese, 2008), this research presented a different paradigm. This paradigm considered that the guidelines and tools provided to enable and aid DFCS implementation were incomplete, inaccurate and/or inadequate to serve their intended purpose. Through this research, some of the available guidelines and tools were fine-tuned and detailed to better enable DFCS implementation. Hence, the research produced certain deliverables. Firstly, the research identified DFCS measures that meet all the criteria for being situated in the capital project design phase. Secondly, the research identified impediments to implementing each of these design-phase DFCS measures where applicable. Thirdly, the research obtained revisions of certain design- phase DFCS measures based on their identified impediments to make them more viable, both for implementation and for improving construction safety. Additionally, the safety benefits of implementing each of the design-phase DFCS measures were identified through the publicly accessible Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) database. These benefits refer to the construction hazard incidents that could have been prevented by implementing the DFCS measures. Lastly, a relational database application was developed to assist designers in making safety a consideration in the early phases of the capital project delivery process. This desktop software application was developed to have the functionality to provide the design-phase DFCS measures, their preventable safety incidents, their potential impediments, potential solutions to their impediments, and their tier of feasibility, based on project characteristics, design profession, and the stage of the design phase. The application also allows for the addition of new DFCS measures and accompanying data. It therefore incorporates the other research deliverables and thus, encapsulates the research findings to serve as a vehicle for utilizing the data to enhance DFCS implementation. In producing and validating these deliverables, a number of research tasks were executed including survey administration to AEC design professionals. Also, over 30 interviews were conducted with design professionals. IV Besides the deliverables, there were a number of findings from the research results. Firstly, the results emphasized a key shortcoming of the DFCS concept. This is the effectiveness of DFCS depends on construction sequence. Secondly, it was determined that DFCS measures or modifications that not only improve construction worker safety but occupant and maintenance worker safety are more likely to be implemented by AEC design professionals and more likely to be accommodated by project owners as well. On this basis, a new dimension was identified towards increasing and improving DFCS implementation. Thirdly, this research further emphasized that the design-build project delivery method offers more opportunity and fewer barriers for DFCS implementation. This research made a number of contributions. Firstly, the research characterized the design suggestions for construction worker safety yielded from earlier research. This research also brought focus to individual DFCS measures and their feasibility for implementation, as opposed to for the DFCS concept as a whole. Secondly, this research, through its deliverables, serves in fulfilling several earlier recommendations for DFCS research and some earlier identified information gaps. These research contributions are collectively intended to enhance and increase DFCS implementation on projects towards improving construction safety. There are a number of motivating factors for this. Firstly, professional, ethical and moral obligations require the safety of others to be protected. Secondly, the improvement of safety could potentially benefit every project stakeholder and participant by minimizing or eliminating the numerous costs associated with injuries to construction workers. Thirdly, all project participants may also benefit in that reducing the number of construction accidents and injuries could avoid disruption to work and avert delays in project completion and as a result, improve productivity (Huang, 2003). Additionally, poor safety performance and its resulting consequences such as court cases and lawsuits expose all project participants to bad publicity which could have such adverse impacts as preventing job awards or causing even more lawsuits from prior projects (Huang, 2003). These reasons collectively highlight the importance of improving construction worker safety and towards this goal, this research emphasized and enhanced DFCS as a strategy for reducing or eliminating construction hazard risks on capital projects. V Acknowledgements I owe an incalculable debt of gratitude to Prof. Omer Akin for chairing my advisory committee and guiding me through this research. His insight and perspectives demonstrated experience and wisdom which I someday wish to have. His time and tireless efforts are forever appreciated. I would also like to thank Prof. Burcu Akinci for her input in the research design and execution. Her questions continuously exposed critical issues in the research. I must also thank Prof. Chimay Anumba, not only for his constructive comments and contributions, but for his effort in traveling several hours for multiple research meetings. All three advisors have earned my unending thanks. I gratefully acknowledge the participation of exactly 100 AEC design professionals in this research. This includes those who completed surveys and those with whom I conducted interviews, along with those that participated in the pilots. I greatly appreciate their time, effort, and input. To them, I give many thanks. I especially wish to thank those that either referenced or provided me with documents that supported their remarks and responses. The documents were all of much value. I am also thankful to two DFCS researchers, Prof. John Gambatese and Prof. Michael
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELECTRICAL and MECHANICAL SAFETY in CONSTRUCTION Electrical and Mechanical Safety in Construction Research Summary
    Construction Industry Council ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION Electrical and Mechanical Safety in Construction Research Summary RESEARCH SUMMARY FOREWORD The Construction Industry Council (CIC) Research Fund was established in September 2012 to Further to the two rounds of focus group meetings and ten structured interviews, a General Safety Image of E&M Works Industry Given that fast track construction is a distinguishing feature of property development in Hong enhance efficiency and competitiveness of the local construction industry. The CIC Research Fund questionnaire survey was conducted to solicit the opinions of E&M practitioners on E&M Kong, workers are usually engaged in the dilemma between progress of works and safety at Generally, the safety image of the E&M industry is not well-developed. Some interviewees encourages research and development activities as well as applications of innovative techniques that works’ safety. The survey can be regarded as a supplement to provide quantitative data works. Despite knowing of the hazards associated with their works, some workers still select expressed that safety culture is not fully established within the E&M industry. A good directly meet the needs of the industry. Moreover, it also promotes establishment of standards and providing more insights to the team to formulate a more complete and effective safety scarifying safe operation for the convenience of works. safety culture within the industry or working environment is essential for stimulating safety good practices for the construction industry now and into the future. measures for E&M works. Based on the combined findings from the focus group meeting, behaviour of workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Considering Construction Safety Requirements in the Design Process
    Guidelines for considering construction safety requirements in the design process Tarcisio Abreu Saurin Ph.D., Associate Professor at DEPROT/UFRGS (Industrial Engineering and Transportation Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5º andar. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. CEP 90040-020. Fax: 55-51-3308-4007. E-mail: [email protected] Carlos Torres Formoso Ph.D., Associate Professor at NORIE/UFRGS (Building Innovation Research Unit, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 3º andar. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. CEP 90040-020. Fax: 55-51-3308-4054. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Considering a process view of design, this paper presents guidelines for integrating safety into that process in the construction industry. Two major sources of evidence were used for developing the guidelines: (a) interviews with seven designers from the construction industry; (b) an empirical study of the integration of safety into design in an industrial building project. It is proposed that design for construction safety (DFCS) is organized as a multi-stage managerial process, starting with a preparatory stage involving decision-making on the major standards to be adopted during that process (e.g. stakeholders and their responsibilities). Then, the proposition is made that, during all stages of design (e.g. conceptual design, executive design), the safety integration into that process follows the stages of the risk management cycle: identification, assessment, response and monitoring. The risk management tasks should be supported both by existing databases of practical suggestions to integrate safety in the design and by a set of DFCS principles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Project Safety Management Plan
    Layton Construction Company, LLC 2020 PROJECT SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 2 PROJECT INFORMATION: Project Name: Project Address: Project Number: Project Superintendent: Project Superintendent Phone: Project Manager: Project Manager Phone: Project Safety Manager: Project Safety Manager Phone: Scope of Work: 3 4 5 2020 | Layton Construction Company LLC ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITMENT At Layton Construction, the commitment to Environmental, Safety and Health is an extension of our philosophy of Constructing with Integrity. Our commitment to Safety excellence is emphasized by: • Management’s commitment and accountability to provide a safe and healthy work environment • Encouraging open communication between all project personnel and soliciting input, support and action to achieve an injury-free environment • Providing training and equipment to help ensure employee safety and project success • Promoting safety as a value rather than a directive and extending that value into all areas of our lives At the Layton Companies, Environmental, Safety and Health are everyone’s responsibility. As a condition of employment with Layton Construction, all employees are accountable to adopt safety as a value and comply with the Best Practices of the highest level of Environmental, Safety and Health Standards and Guidelines. LAYTONCONSTRUCTION.COM 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LAYTON CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OF SAFETY ................................ ............................ 9 Layton Injury Free Environment - L.I.F.E. ...................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Construction Site Safety
    Designing for Construction Safety: Concepts and Practice John Gambatese, PhD, PE School of Civil and Construction Engineering Oregon State University 2009 DOE ISM Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Bio – John Gambatese John Gambatese is an Associate Professor in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. Dr. Gambatese’s educational background includes Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley with emphases in structural engineering, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Washington in the area of construction engineering and management. He has worked in industry as a structural engineer, and as a project engineer for a construction management firm. Dr. Gambatese has taught courses on construction contracts and specifications, construction safety and productivity improvement, planning and scheduling, structural analysis and design, temporary construction structures, and engineering economics. He has performed research and published numerous articles on construction worker safety, constructability, innovation, construction contracting, and life cycle properties of civil engineering facilities. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), and actively participates on ASCE’s Construction Site Safety Committee, Constructability Committee, and Construction Research Council. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in California. Prevention through
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2019-2020 Construction Safety Report
    2019– 2020 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY REPORT © 2021 City of New York by and through the Department of Buildings. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: The information in this document is only a summary and overview. Data and conclusions are based on information known to the Department as of the date of this document and are subject to change. The City shall not be responsible for any damages arising out of or in connection with any information contained in this document. IN THIS REPORT Message from the Commissioner . 3 Executive Summary . 5 Construction Safety and Enforcement Summary . 9 2019: A Year of Success Enforcing Site Safety . 9 2020: Building Safely During a Pandemic . 26 Incidents Involving Pedestrians and Members of the Public . 37 Highlights: Construction Safety Enforcement Review, 2019-2020 . 40 Focus On: Proactive Inspections and the Construction Safety Compliance (CSC) Unit . 40 The First Years of the CSC Unit . 40 Proactive Enforcement amid New COVID Requirements . 44 Focus On: Emergency Response Team and Operations Center (ERT) . 45 Focus On: Site Safety Training—Creating a Culture of Safety . 49 Making Sure Everyone Gets the Training They Need . 50 CBO and Day Laborer Outreach . 50 An Expansion of Online SST Training . 51 Focus On: New Site Safety Regulations and Penalties . 53 C-Hook Prohibition . 53 Changes to Our Façade Inspection Program . 53 Holding Owners Accountable in Criminal Court . 55 Cold-Formed Steel . 56 Elevator Door Lock Monitoring Systems . 56 Crane Modernization . 57 Focus On: COVID-19 Safety Guidelines . 58 Focus On: Office of the Tenant Advocate (OTA) . 60 Disciplinary Actions: Accountability of Licensed Design Professionals and Licensed Practitioners .
    [Show full text]
  • Designing for Construction Safety – a Construction Management Approach
    DESIGNING FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY – A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT APPROACH Rizwan U. Farooqui, Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Construction Management College of Engineering & Computing, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler St. #2952, Miami, FL 33174, US, A, Tel: (305)-348-3172, Fax: (305)-348-6255, [email protected] Syed M. Ahmed, Associate Professor & Graduate Program Director, Associate Editor, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering & Management (JCEM), Department of Construction Management, College of Engineering & Computing, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler St. #2952, Miami, FL 33174, USA, Tel: (305)-348-2730, Fax: (305)-348-6255, [email protected] Nida Azhar, Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan, Tel: (92-21)-9261261 ext. 2205, Fax: (92-21)- 9261255, [email protected] ABSTRACT Studies have suggested and confirmed that designers can provide critical input involving construction worker safety. Continued progress is being made in the areas of education and training to better serve all participants in the construction industry, including owners, designers and contractors. Construction management has also become an acceptable and growing profession as it serves to address constructability issues through the sharing of information among all participants in the project. This paper offers a construction management (CM) approach to designing for construction safety by proposing a structured CM approach to information sharing and project collaboration for construction safety. The proposed structured CM approach has been developed based on the findings of a structured survey targeted to design and CM professionals in the construction industry. Keywords: DFCS, Construction Management, OSHA 1. INTRODUCTION Designing for construction safety entails addressing the safety of construction workers in the design of the permanent features of a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Delphi Panels to Assess Construction Safety Research to Practice: a Narrative Review
    www.cpwr.com • www.elcosh.org Using Delphi Panels to Assess Construction Safety Research to Practice: A Narrative Review Stephanie Mazzucca, PhD Christopher Weatherly, LCSW, MPH Alexandra B. Morshed, MS Rachel Tabak, PhD, RD Washington University December 2018 8484 Georgia Avenue Suite 1000 Silver Spring, MD 20910 phone: 301.578.8500 fax: 301.578.8572 ©2018, CPWR-The Center for Construction Research and Training. All rights reserved. CPWR is the research and training arm of NABTU. Production of this document was supported by cooperative agreement OH 009762 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH. Using Delphi Panels to assess construction safety research to practice: a narrative review INTRODUCTION: Despite ongoing efforts to improve site safety, the construction field still accounts for a disproportionate injury rate and remains one of the most dangerous industries for workers. The Delphi Method is a systematic procedure that is employed to achieve a reliable consensus among a selected panel of experts. This project’s purpose was to review relevant papers and research on Delphi Panels and their potential use in assessing whether construction safety and health research findings are being used by target audiences of workers and contractors to reduce injuries and illnesses (research to practice). A secondary objective of this review was to understand the parameters of panel selection, composition, and analysis. This project will help contribute to the broader dissemination and implementation field. The Delphi method was developed in the mid-1950’s by a group of researchers in the fields of forecasting and planning at the RAND Corporation (Dalkey & Helmer, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • RR1082 Research Report
    Health and Safety Executive The effectiveness of HSE’s regulatory approach: The construction example Prepared by Frontline Consultants for the Health and Safety Executive 2016 RR1082 Research Report Health and Safety Executive The effectiveness of HSE’s regulatory approach: The construction example Mike Webster and Helen Bolt Frontline Consultants Central Court 25 Southampton Buildings London WC2A 1AL Prepared in December 2013 This project has examined the effectiveness HSE’s approach to regulation of the construction sector since 2001. HSE provided a catalyst for change – utilising its unique information on the industry and expertise in understanding reasonably practicable control to support risk creators in their control of these risks. HSE worked through the supply chain by engaging and acting in partnership with those able to bring about widespread change – such as company directors, or strategic bodies focused on particular interest groups or sectors. New broader intervention approaches were designed to allow HSE to engage appropriately at critical points in the supply chain. In light of HSE’s work with the construction industry - and the industry’s efforts to take responsibility and make good health and safety a priority - substantial improvements in health and safety management and performance can be identified. A number of key messages are identified, to be considered in the application of such approaches to other industry sectors. These are necessary elements to enable effective engagement with a sector and for the sector to take up the mantle to ‘be part of the solution’ and achieve sustained improvement in health and safety performance. This report and the work it describes were funded by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Site Safety Manual Contents Total Page No
    (Ver.Nov.2000) Construction Site Safety Manual Contents Total Page No. Pages CHAPTER 1 POLICY, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY (Ver. Sep. 99) (2) 1.1 Policy C1-PO1 1.2 Objectives C1-PO1 1.3 Strategy C1-PO1 1.4 General C1-PO2 CHAPTER 2 LEGISLATION AND CODES OF PRACTICE (Ver. Sep. 99) (19) 2.1 General C2-PO1 2.2 Factories and Industrial Undertakings Ordinance C2-PO1 2.3 Other Relevant Ordinances C2-PO7 2.4 Codes of Practice C2-P19 CHAPTER 3 CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS ON (Ver. Sep. 98) (7) CONSTRUCTION SAFETY (Ver. Nov. 2000) 3.1 Introduction and Guidance Notes C3-PO1 CHAPTER 4 RESPONSIBILITIES (Ver. Sep. 99) (9) 4.1 Introduction C4-PO1 4.2 Responsibilities C4-PO1 4.3 General Duties in Law C4-PO6 CHAPTER 5 SAFETY TRAINING AND PROMOTION (Ver. Sep. 99) (7) 5.1 Safety Training C5-PO1 5.2 Safety Publications C5-PO6 5.3 Safety Promotion C5-PO6 CHAPTER 6 SAFETY COMMITTEES (Ver. Sep. 99) (6) 6.1 General C6-PO1 6.2 Site Safety Management Committee C6-PO1 6.3 Site Safety Committee C6-PO3 CHAPTER 7 SITE SAFETY PERSONNEL (Ver. Sep. 99) (12) i (Ver.Nov.2000) 7.1 Contractor's Safety Personnel C7-PO1 7.2 Architect/Engineer's Safety Personnel C7-PO3 7.3 Employment & Performance of Registered C7-PO8 Safety Officer CHAPTER 8 SAFETY INSPECTIONS AND FOLLOW UP (Ver. Sep. 99) (8) 8.1 Inspections C8-PO1 8.2 Follow Up Actions C8-PO7 8.3 Reporting of Safety Performance C8-PO8 CHAPTER 9 ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND (Ver.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abcs of Construction Site Safety
    The ABCs of construction site safety Safe jobs are smart business One serious injury can stop the growth of your business in its tracks. We offer no-cost safety & health consultations, training, and education workshops. Contact us at 800-922-2689 www.orosha.org On the cover: Crane operator 2 The ABCs of construction site safety 3 Contents About this guide ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Accident prevention and accident investigation .........................................................................................8 Barricades and other traffic controls ........................................................................................................10 Chemicals .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Confined Spaces ........................................................................................................................................ 14 CC: Cranes ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Division 3 – construction rules .................................................................................................................. 18 Electrical ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Design and Construction EDUCATION MODULE
    Photo courtesy of Thinkstock Architectural Design and Construction EDUCATION MODULE Developed by Michael Behm , Ph.D. Cory Boughton East Carolina University Architecture Guide for Instructors Slide Approx. Slides numbers minutes Introduction to Prevention through Design 5–28 45 Site Planning 29–34 10 Excavation 35–40 10 Building Elements 41–65 50 General Considerations 66–68 5 Building Decommissioning 69–71 5 Recap 72–73 5 References and Other Sources 74–88 — Architecture Overview • PtD concept • Site planning • Excavation • Building elements • General considerations • Decommissioning Photo courtesy of Thinkstock Architecture Learning Objectives • Explain the Prevention through Design (PtD) concept. • List reasons why project owners may wish to incorporate PtD in their projects. • Identify workplace hazards and risks associated with design decisions and recommend design alternatives to alleviate or lessen those risks. Architecture Introduction to Prevention through Design EDUCATION MODULE Architecture Occupational Safety and Health • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) www.osha.gov – Part of the Department of Labor – Assures safe and healthful workplaces – Sets and enforces standards – Provides training, outreach, education, and assistance – State regulations possibly more stringent • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) www.cdc.gov/niosh – Part of the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Conducts research and makes recommendations for the prevention of work-related injury and illness Architecture Construction Hazards • Cuts • Electrocution • Falls • Falling objects • Heat/cold stress • Musculoskeletal disease Graphic courtesy of OSHA • Tripping [BLS 2006; Lipscomb et al. 2006] Architecture Construction Accidents in the United States Construction is one of the most hazardous occupations. This industry accounts for • 8% of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Safety Culture Among Personnel in Governmental Construction Sites at Saudi Arabia: a Quantitative Study Approach
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2016 Assessing Safety Culture among Personnel in Governmental Construction Sites at Saudi Arabia: A Quantitative Study Approach Omar Alrehaili University of Central Florida Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Alrehaili, Omar, "Assessing Safety Culture among Personnel in Governmental Construction Sites at Saudi Arabia: A Quantitative Study Approach" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5261. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5261 ASSESSING SAFETY CULTURE AMONG PERSONNEL IN GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRUCTION SITES AT SAUDI ARABIA: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY APPROACH by OMAR ALREHAILI B.S. Industrial Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, 2010 M.S. Industrial Engineering, University of South Florida, 2014 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2016 Major Professor: Waldemar Karwowski © 2016 Omar Alrehaili ii ABSTRACT Safety is an essential issue for organizations to survive, especially for hazardous industries such as the construction industry. The construction industry is considered to be one of the major industries that help in the growth of the economy and the infrastructure of all countries.
    [Show full text]