DOCSLIB.ORG

MORRIS-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Copyright by Matthew B. Morris 2017 The Dissertation Committee for Matthew B. Morris Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Virtual Movements: Populist Rhetoric, Technology, and Hegemony Committee: Joshua Gunn, Supervisor D D Davis Sharon Jarvis Barry Brummett Dana Cloud Virtual Movements: Populist Rhetoric, Technology, and Hegemony by Matthew B. Morris Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2017 Dedication For The People Acknowledgements I want to start by thanking my parents, Fr. John and Dr. Cheryl Morris, and my sister, Elizabeth Morris, for their love and support. Growing up in a house full of books is what started me on this journey. Thanks to Joshua Gunn for his advice and patience while I was working on this project. His model for teaching and scholarship will continue to be a guide throughout my career. I want to also thank my committee, Diane Davis, Sharon Jarvis, Dana Cloud, and Barry Brummett who have each taught me so much through their feedback and guidance. A special thanks to my adviser for my master’s thesis, Daniel Brouwer, who continued to believe I could do this even when I did not. There are too many people to name but I want to especially thank my writing buddies and friends Melissa Murphy, Kate Blackburn, Marnie Ritchie, Jenna Hanchey, LaRae Tronstad, Kayla Rhidenour, Elizabeth Glowaki, and Joe Faina. I have been lucky to have met so many great friends and colleagues during this journey, and a special thanks is due to Cynthia Peacock, Maegan Stephens, Elizabeth Goins, Ashley Muddiman, Robert McDonald, Bryan McCann, Ashley Mack, Tiara Naputi, Sean Tiffee, John McKenzie, Josh Hanan, McAllen Halsey, Jason Fischer, Ashley Marie Sanders, Scott Balcerzak, Danee Pye, Gamze Yilmaz, Roy Christopher, Clare Boyle, Clariza Ruiz de Castilla, Valerie Thatcher Murphy, Maryanne Taylor, Leah Lefebvre, Nick Merola, Joe McGlynn, Ashley Barrett, Rob Mack, Kristin Stimpson, and Sarah Vartabedian. v Virtual Movements: Populist Rhetoric, Technology, and Hegemony Matthew B. Morris, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2017 Supervisor: Joshua Gunn After the Financial Crisis of 2008, The Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street both claimed to be “The People” seeking representation. Each of these movements had very different narratives about the flaws in our political system, and each movement proposed conflicting solutions. In this dissertation, I offer the theory of virtual movements as a way of understanding the role media technologies play in shaping our political perceptions as groups struggle for hegemony. I analyze the narrative of the Tea Party as it is disseminated through conservative media with a broadcast structure that emphasizes fidelity to an idealized past as the solution to our current problems; For Occupy, the rejection of representation and desire to embody direct democracy without mediation relies upon a metaphysics of presence modeled on social media in which the ideal is a simulation of immediacy. Each of these movements claimed to operate without a leader, but reproduced a system of authority through their dependence on technology. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................1 Defining the Objects of Study: Tea Party and Occupy Movement Rhetoric ..6 Research Questions Motivating the Dissertation Study: Rhetorically Negotiating "The People"..................................................9 Literature Review: Tea Party and Occupy ....................................................11 The Tea Party .......................................................................................13 Occupy .................................................................................................22 Chapter 2: Theory and Method ..............................................................................34 A Note on Political Media and Perceptions ....................................................3 Literature Review: Social Movements and Hegemony ..................................6 Literature Review: Media Technology .........................................................15 Movement Media Ecologies ................................................................25 The Populist Frame: Tribes and Territories ..................................................29 Research Questions, Method, and Selection of Texts...................................46 A Populist Pentad .................................................................................48 Texts/Contexts .....................................................................................50 Chapter 3: Mourning in America ...........................................................................53 The Logic of Representation in Conservative Media ...................................57 The Dogmatic Image of Thought .........................................................62 Contemporary Conservative Media and the Dogmatic Image of Thought ..........................................67 Analysis: The Tea Party Narrative ................................................................73 The Crisis: The Market Versus the Government .................................79 The People and the Enemy: Reagan Versus Obama ............................90 Tribes, Territories, and Time ......................................................................103 Chapter 4: The Politics of Presence in Occupy’s Assemblies .............................112 Media Affects: The Internet as Structuring Technology ............................118 Productive Consumers: The Internet and Occupy .............................119 vii The Crisis: “We are the 99%” and the Failure of the American Dream ....................................127 The People and Their Enemy: The Demand for Authenticity ...........134 The Territory of Occupy and the Politics of Presence ................................138 Conclusion: Making America Great Again .........................................................145 Research Questions and Findings: ..............................................................152 Limitations ..................................................................................................164 Directions for future research: ....................................................................167 Implications: ...............................................................................................168 Bibliography ........................................................................................................175 Vita .....................................................................................................................195 viii Chapter 1: Introduction This is about the people. This is about the people. And it's bigger than any king or queen of a Tea Party. And it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a teleprompter. – Sarah Palin to the 2010 Tea Party Convention1 We demand an end to legitimized corruption / through a constitutional reversal / of the Citizens United decision. / This will help the American people. / Have a pleasant day. – Occupy Charleston to Rep. Michele Bachmann2 The USS Yorktown in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, was a fitting setting for a foreign policy speech. On November 10, 2011, Representative Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota, a candidate for the Republican nomination for president and founder of the Tea Party Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives, was giving her foreign policy address in front of the ship when members of Occupy Charleston rose in unison to interrupt her speech.3 As she said “the American consumer,” a single voice yelled “mic check!” which was echoed by a handful of young people dispersed through the crowd. In this disruption, the protestors were using a technique known as “the human microphone” that was developed by Occupy Wall Street protesters when the latter were banned by 1Sarah Palin, “Keynote Address at 2010 Tea Party Convention,” CNN, Feb. 6, 2010, http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1002/06/cnr.09.html. 2Brandon Fish, “Michele Bachmann Gets Mic Checked by Occupy Charleston, South Carolina,” YouTube, Nov. 10, 2011, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9e34kHANHs. 3“‘Occupy Wall Street’ protestors interrupt Bachmann speech,” NBC News, Nov. 10, 2011, http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2011/11/10/8739200-occupy-wall-street-protesters-interrupt- bachmann-speech. My description of the speech itself comes from the YouTube video referenced in the previous footnote, but the context is from the NBC account. 1 New York City noise ordinances from using megaphones. Occupy Charleston was part of a larger movement most famously known as Occupy Wall Street (hereafter “Occupy” for short) that developed in the Fall of 2011 to demand economic justice after the financial crisis of 2008. When a member is speaking, she or he says a phrase and then pauses so that the rest of the gathered protestors can repeat what is said. In this case, Occupy Charleston activists accused Bachmann of “capitaliz[ing] on dividing Americans / claiming people that disagree with you / are unpatriotic socialists / and you promote discrimination.” They criticized Bachmann and, by extension, the Tea Party, for accepting funding from Americans for Prosperity, a group founded by oil billionaires David and Charles Koch. By saying that Bachmann has
Recommended publications
  • Moving the Race Conversation Forward Part 1

    Moving the Race Conversation Forward Part 1

    THE MOVING RACE CONVERSATION FORWARD HOW THE MEDIA COVERS RACISM, AND OTHER BARRIERS TO PRODUCTIVE RACIAL DISCOURSE PART 1 JANUARY 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 Prologue A 1 | Introduction 1 2 | Content Analysis of Mainstream Media 6 3 | Harmful Racial Discourse Practices 11 4 | Recommendations and Conclusion 27 5 | Acknowledgments and Endnotes 30 6 | Appendix A 32 PROLOGUE oving the Race Conversation Forward is a two-part report that first, describes some of the major impediments to productive Engage with us racial discourse in the United States, and second, profiles and provides lessons from several recent interventions and initiatives and others who M that are breaking down significant barriers toward racial justice. are reshaping and PART ONE: HOW THE MEDIA COVERS RACISM, AND OTHER BARRIERS TO reforming the way PRODUCTIVE RACIAL DISCOURSE identifies and describes some of the key ways in which mainstream discourse in the United States unproductively approaches we talk about race issues of race and racism. In this report, we present our expansive analysis of recent media coverage on race and racism (Section 2), and our description of and racism in our Seven Harmful Racial Discourse Practices that occur not just in mainstream media, but in varied spaces where “race talk” takes place (Section 3). It also pro- country today and vides some everyday discourse recommendations applicable to everyone from racial and social justice advocates to media editors to leaders and members of into the future. religious groups to news consumers. PART TWO: RACIAL DISCOURSE CHANGE IN PRACTICE provides case studies of re- cent interventions and initiatives advanced by the racial justice field to disrupt and supplant unproductive mainstream discussions of race and racism.
  • Occupy Wall Street: a Movement in the Making

    Occupy Wall Street: a Movement in the Making

    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 5-20-2012 Occupy Wall Street: A Movement in the Making Hannah G. Kaneck Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the American Politics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Education Policy Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Health Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Political Economy Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Kaneck, Hannah G., "Occupy Wall Street: A Movement in the Making". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2012. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/245 Occupy Wall Street: a movement in the making Hannah Kaneck Spring 2012 1 Dedicated to my grandmother Jane Armstrong Special thanks to my parents Karrie and Mike Kaneck, my readers Stephen Valocchi and Sonia Cardenas, the Trinity College Human Rights Program, and to my siblings at Cleo of Alpha Chi 2 Table of Contents Timeline leading up to September 17, 2011 Occupation of Wall Street…………………….……………….4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….….……..6 Where did they come from?...........................................................................................................7
  • U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress

    U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress

    U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Michael Moodie Assistant Director and Senior Specialist in Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Updated February 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44891 U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The U.S. role in the world refers to the overall character, purpose, or direction of U.S. participation in international affairs and the country’s overall relationship to the rest of the world. The U.S. role in the world can be viewed as establishing the overall context or framework for U.S. policymakers for developing, implementing, and measuring the success of U.S. policies and actions on specific international issues, and for foreign countries or other observers for interpreting and understanding U.S. actions on the world stage. While descriptions of the U.S. role in the world since the end of World War II vary in their specifics, it can be described in general terms as consisting of four key elements: global leadership; defense and promotion of the liberal international order; defense and promotion of freedom, democracy, and human rights; and prevention of the emergence of regional hegemons in Eurasia. The issue for Congress is whether the U.S. role in the world is changing, and if so, what implications this might have for the United States and the world. A change in the U.S. role could have significant and even profound effects on U.S. security, freedom, and prosperity. It could significantly affect U.S.
  • FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR

    FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR

    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA START TIME Duration min:sec Public Affairs Issue 1 Public Affairs Issue 2 Show & Narrative 1/2/2017 TAKE TWO: The Binge– 2016 was a terrible year - except for all the awesome new content that was Entertainment Industry available to stream. Mark Jordan Legan goes through the best that 2016 had to 9:42 8:30 offer with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: The Ride 2017– 2017 is here and our motor critic, Sue Carpenter, Transportation puts on her prognosticator hat to predict some of the automotive stories we'll be talking about in the new year 9:51 6:00 with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Presidents and the Press– Presidential historian Barbara Perry says contention between a President Politics Media and the news media is nothing new. She talks with Alex Cohen about her advice for journalists covering the 10:07 10:30 Trump White House. TAKE TWO: The Wall– Political scientist Peter Andreas says building Trump's Immigration Politics wall might be easier than one thinks because hundreds of miles of the border are already lined with barriers. 10:18 12:30 He joins Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Prison Podcast– A podcast Law & is being produced out of San Quentin Media Order/Courts/Police State Prison called Ear Hustle. We hear some excerpts and A Martinez talks to 10:22 9:30 one of the producers, Nigel Poor. TAKE TWO: The Distance Between Us– Reyna Grande grew up in poverty in Books/ Literature/ Iguala, Mexico, left behind by her Immigration Authors parents who had gone north looking for a better life and she's written a memoir for young readers.
  • African Americans 30 Plus

    African Americans 30 Plus

    My name is Darren Boykin, CEO and Publisher of The Urban Source magazine. Our magazine offers you the Power of reaching the buying power of Dayton’s African Americans 30 plus. When consumers see your advertising message in our magazines, they realize it’s something they should care about. The $773 billion dollars African- American consumer spend offers your business an extremely vital, affluent audience that is waiting to be tapped. Your message in The Urban Source publication shows you care enough about the African-American consumer to reach them in Dayton Newest Sophisticated magazine. We offer custom packages that are guaranteed to satisfy your advertising needs. The Urban Source is published monthly and is dedicated to African American lifestyle topics, trends and more. Feel free to contact us at 1(888)466-0850 for more info. We warn to our readers that some articles disclosed in this issue can contain material that can be highly offensive to some readers and we advise that you GET YOUR COPY take precaution to prepare yourself before reading any further. TODAY! PICK UP YOUR COPY OF THE URBAN SOURCE MAGAZINE AT OUR FINE RETAILERS LISTED BELOW! BP, 3898 Salem Avenue Mitchell’s Cleaners 4205 N. Main Street 14 Karat Gold, Sunoco, 3900 Salem Avenue 1872 N. Gettysburg Avenue Stromas Flowers & Gift Shop 4180 N. Gettysburg Avenue NorthRiver Coffeehouse & Eatery Tony Yancey, Insurance Agency, 2331 N. Gettysburg Avenue Table 44 Restaurant 323 Salem Avenue Insurance Warehouse, Payday Stone Plans, 2331 N. Gettysburg Ave. 2160 N. Gettysburg Avenue Mary-Anns Southern Kitchen 2456 N. Gettysburg Avenue Maranatha Christian Fellowship Gold Stone Jewelry, Inc./Smoke Shop, 3651 Salem Avenue Nabali’s Wireless Church (Youth Center) 4501 Wolf Rd 2174 N.
  • The Medium Is the Masses: Embodied Amplifcation, Urban Occupation

    The Medium Is the Masses: Embodied Amplifcation, Urban Occupation

    The Medium is the Masses: Embodied Amplifcation, Urban Occupation Katherine Kelp-Stebbins and Allison M. Schifani In September 2011, groups of community organizers, activists, and others gathered to protest economic inequality in New York City’s Zuccotti Park under the banner of "Occupy Wall Street." The crowd that formed in the heart of the city’s financial district launched what became a diverse and global movement now known simply as "Occupy." In this initiatory protest, a city ordinance prevented speakers from using electronic amplification systems to address the large audience. Occupiers tactically responded to the absence of microphones or megaphones and speaker systems with an embodied technology known as the people’s mic. In its practice, participants hoping to address the crowds in attendance and at general assemblies (meetings open to all for planning future actions and administering to the daily needs of the occupiers) shouted “mic check,” and the crowd of bodies around them loudly echoed the speaker in response. Thus, they could deliver messages to those out of earshot in the occupied spaces. This phenomenon spread well beyond the boundaries of Zuccotti Park to Occupy protests in Oakland, Los Angeles, Detroit, Portland, and elsewhere. The people’s mic became so emblematic and—we will argue—intrinsic to the objectives of occupation that participants used it instead of electronic Media Fields Journal no. 9 (2015) 2 Medium is the Masses amplification in many places where such communication systems were legal and available. Our project is to articulate the specific context and stakes involved in Occupy’s tactical use of embodied technology.
  • Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America

    Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America

    Issue No. 3, Summer 2021 Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America AEI, Reopening By Robert Doar The hot summer is here in Washington and with it, at long last, a return to the way our building on Massachusetts Avenue should always be. Scholars and public officials are gathering for meals and meetings. Students are assembling for classes conducted by the best public intellectuals in America. The halls are alive with talk of how we can advance the promise of the United States with policies that promote individual freedom, family, faith, and the benefits of work and free and open markets. Like many of you, throughout much of the past year, AEI scholars and staff became experts in Zoom and found new ways to stay connected with our wider community. For the most part, some members of AEI’s senior team and I were at our desks here in the D’Aniello Building, but it was a pretty empty space. Thankfully, our scholars, research assistants, and business and outreach teams working remotely continued to lead the most important debates facing our nation. Some of the great work our scholars produced during this unprecedented time includes Scott Gottlieb’s bipartisan leadership on our pandemic response (including his 66 consecutive appearances on Face the Nation); Michael R. Strain’s crucial role in designing and implementing the Paycheck Protection Program, which helped save millions of jobs; Frederick M. Hess’ launch of the Conservative Education Reform Network, which is planting the intellectual seeds for meaningful reform in school systems nationwide; Kori Schake’s revitalization of the AEI defense team, including the creation of the Defense Futures Simulator and the addition of a leading national security scholar, Klon Kitchen; and Yuval Levin, Matthew Continetti, and Adam J.
  • The Tea Party: Burgeoning Or Beaten?

    The Tea Party: Burgeoning Or Beaten?

    Augsburg Honors Review Volume 5 Article 6 2012 The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen Florida Alantic University Alexa Robinson Florida Atlantic University Follow this and additional works at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Olsen, Philip and Robinson, Alexa (2012) "The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten?," Augsburg Honors Review: Vol. 5 , Article 6. Available at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review/vol5/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Idun. It has been accepted for inclusion in Augsburg Honors Review by an authorized editor of Idun. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Teo Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? 55 The Tea Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen, Florida Atlantic University and Alexa Robsinson, Florida Atlantic University Philip Olsen and Alexa Robinson are sophomores at Florida Atlantic University and presented this paper at the 2011NCHC conference in Phoenix, Arizona. Philip is continuing to pursue his bachelor\ degree in English and philosophy and expects to graduate in 2014. 56 The Tea Party: Burgeoningor BgatqX I. Introduction The Tea Party is a grassroots political movement which has gained a considerable following since its inception in 2009.Its platform centers on a single issue -- greater fiscal responsibility and conservatism on the part of each respective level of government. In this paper we examine the question of whether or not the Tea Party will develop into a viable political entity. We concluded early on in the process of researching this paper that extensive statistical analysis would only be a fruitless endeavor because of the contemporaneity of the Tea Party movement.
  • Download File

    Download File

    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
  • The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By

    The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By

    The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By John Leyland Price M.A., Central Michigan University, 2013 B.S.B.A., Central Michigan University, 2010 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Brett Bricker Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Wayne Sailor Date Defended: 5 September 2019 ii The dissertation committee for John Leyland Price certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Date Approved: 5 September 7 2019 iii Abstract On February 19, 2009, CNBC journalist Rick Santelli’s fiery outburst against the Obama Administration on national television gave the Tea Party Movement (TPM) its namesake. Soon after rallies were organized across the U.S. under the Tea Party banner. From its inception in 2009, the TPM became an essential player in U.S. politics and pivotal in flipping control of the Senate and House to the Republican Party during the 2010 midterm elections. The movement faced controversy on both sides of the political spectrum for its beliefs and fervent stance against compromising with political adversaries. Researchers argued that the TPM was an example of Richard Hofstadter’s Paranoid Style. Others claimed that the movement’s rhetoric, member demographics, and political success demonstrated it was outside the boundaries of the Paranoid Style.
  • Occupy Wall Street: a Movement in the Making Hannah G

    Occupy Wall Street: a Movement in the Making Hannah G

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trinity College Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Works 5-20-2012 Occupy Wall Street: A Movement in the Making Hannah G. Kaneck Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Recommended Citation Kaneck, Hannah G., "Occupy Wall Street: A Movement in the Making". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2012. Trinity College Digital Repository, http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/245 Occupy Wall Street: a movement in the making Hannah Kaneck Spring 2012 1 Dedicated to my grandmother Jane Armstrong Special thanks to my parents Karrie and Mike Kaneck, my readers Stephen Valocchi and Sonia Cardenas, the Trinity College Human Rights Program, and to my siblings at Cleo of Alpha Chi 2 Table of Contents Timeline leading up to September 17, 2011 Occupation of Wall Street…………………….……………….4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….….……..6 Where did they come from?...........................................................................................................7 New York, NY: A History of Occupation……………………………………………………………………………………..8 Talking Shop and Jamming Hard: Adbusters roots…………………………………………………………………..11 Inspiration is Just around the Corner: Bloombergville……………………………………………………………..16 The Devil’s in the Details: Organizing through Direct Democracy………….……………………………......17 The Occupation…………..…………………………………………………………………………….…………………………….18
  • The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21St Century | Matt

    The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21St Century | Matt

    The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21st Century | Matt Taibbi As news reporting becomes more politicized, more negativistic, less trustworthy, February 18th, 2019 and generally more of a headache to digest, people increasingly are going to turn to narrative as a source of information. ― Matt Taibbi INTRODUCTION Matt Taibbi is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and winner of the 2008 National Magazine Award for columns and commentary. His most recent book is ‘I Can’t Breathe: A Killing on Bay Street,’ about the infamous killing of Eric Garner by the New York City police. He’s also the author of the New York Times bestsellers 'Insane Clown President,' 'The Divide,' 'Griftopia,' and 'The Great Derangement.' WHY DO I CARE? For someone who has made his career working in and around media – first, on the application development/UI side and later, on the content and editorial side – I have been impressed by how long the legacy industry has struggled to keep up with the disruptive forces of innovation wrought by the Web (blogs, in particular), Google (YouTube included), Apple (podcasting, in particular), and the large social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). Although Craig’s List, Monster.com, and other online list boards were the first to really attack the business-side of the news industry (print media, primarily), it was blog software that commoditized journalism and created the first real, online market for alternative news and information. YouTube Media - began to do the same for the broadcast and cable news markets, and now podcasts are disrupting everything by taking attention away from written, as well as motion content, particularly for long- Multi form, in-depth material.