Sex, Drugs, and Rotifers: Endocrine Disrupting Water Contaminants and Rotifer Reproductive Cycling
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sex, Drugs, and Rotifers: Endocrine Disrupting Water Contaminants and Rotifer Reproductive Cycling Charlotte Hovland1 Advised by Kristin Gribble2 1The Biological Sciences Collegiate Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 2Josephine Bay Paul Center. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Abstract Monogonot rotifers are near-ubiquitous invertebrate zooplankton, distinguished by their cyclically parthanogenetic reproductive activity. This reproductive cycling is regulated by steroid hormones, possibly including estrogen. In this study, I observed the effects of two estrogen agonists and known environmental pollutants, 4-nonylphenol and 17α-ethynylestradiol, on rotifer population growth rates, sex ratios, and egg quality. Neither nonylphenol or ethynylestradiol, nor both in conjunction had any effect on population growth rates and they had only mixed effects on sex ratios. However, the estrogen agonists did have a marked impact on egg quality. The estrogen agonists’ effects on egg development were sex specific, with male eggs showing greater susceptibility. Nonylphenol and ethynylestradiol influenced egg quality at far lower concentrations in combination than were sufficient to produce results in tests of individual compounds. This suggests interactions between the two endocrine-disrupting compounds that may be cause for environmental concern. Keywords: Rotifers, endocrine disruption, mixis Introduction Rotifers (phylum Rotifera) are zooplanktonic invertebrates. Rotifers are “ubiquitous,” appearing globally in freshwater and marine systems, and even in moist soils (Fontaneto and De Smet, 2015). Although they are small (generally < 1mm in length), rotifers are of great ecological importance. As low-level consumers, rotifers take in energy and nutrients from phytoplankton, detritus, and single-celled bacteria and protozoa (Fontaneto and De Smet, 2015). In turn, rotifers are consumed by macro-organisms, including large zooplankton, benthic worms, and larval fish. Rotifers package energy and nutrients from the smallest scale organisms in their ecosystems and allow their export to larger animals, bridging the gap between the micro and macroscopic worlds within aquatic ecosystems (Fontaneto and De Smet, 2015; Huang et al., 1 2012). Monogonota is the most specious rotifer sub-group, and includes my study organism, Brachionus manjavacas. Monogonot rotifers are cyclically parthenogenetic, and males and females are highly sexually dimorphic, with females composing most of the population. Under ideal conditions, asexual (amictic) females produce eggs by mitosis, resulting in the parthanogenetic development of clonal, diploid daughters (Radix et al., 2001). However, at high populations densities and in response to changes in photoperiod, sexual (mictic) reproduction is triggered, and a portion of the eggs released by the amictic females develop into mictic females, which produce haploid ova by meiosis (Snell, 2011). If these eggs go unfertilized, they develop into small, haploid males, which are then available to mate with the mictic females. Once mating occurs, the zygote develops into a ‘resting egg,’ an embryo surrounded by a thick shell. The resting eggs settle out of the water column and enter a period of dormancy in the sediments below (Fontaneto and De Smet, 2015). Once conditions are again favorable, the resting eggs emerge and complete their development into amictic females. Mictic reproduction is density dependent and regulates rotifer population dynamics. The production of resting eggs removes rotifers from active circulation in preparation for winter, during population booms, or when their aquatic habitat shrinks, concentrating the rotifers in the remaining water and increasing their population densities. This allows rotifer populations to endure dramatic fluctuations in habitat quality. Mixis is thought to be under the control of a pheromone, released into water by female rotifers (Snell, 2006). As in bacterial quorum sensing, the strength of the signal is related to the density of rotifers releasing the signaling molecule, so that the rotifers will only transition to mixis when certain density thresholds are surpassed (Snell, 2 2011; Stout et al., 2010). Once the mixis signal has been triggered, the rotifers’ reproductive response is under hormonal control (Snell, 2011; Stout, 2010). Steroid hormones in particular are increasingly well-supported candidates for the primary regulators of rotifer reproduction. Snell et al. (2006) observed similarities between fragments of a purported mixis signaling protein and a protein that induces steroidogenesis in humans, while Stout et al. (2010) revealed the presence of progesterone receptors in male and female rotifers. Recently, Jones et al. (2017) discovered an estrogen-like receptor in Brachionus rotifers. This estrogen-like receptor is so highly conserved with respect to mammalian estrogen receptors that it is able to bind human estradiol as a ligand. Several teams of researchers have shown that rotifers respond when their environment is dosed with human steroid hormones, including progesterone, estrogen, and testosterone (Snell and DesRosiers, 2008; Gardallo et al., 1997; Preston et al., 2000). This has led to concerns that rotifer reproductive cycling may be disrupted by water contaminants that are androgen and estrogen mimics or antagonists. These contaminants include β –estradiol, ethynylestradiol, nonylphenol and nonylphenol-ethoxylate, dioxin, and endosulfan (Depledge and Billinghurst, 1999; Roefer, 2000; Swartz et al., 2006; and Zhang, 2015). In isolation, ethynylestradiol and nonylphenol have been shown to reduce the number of females in rotifer populations as well as the proportion of mictic females (Radix, 2001). Endocrine agonists and antagonists have previously been shown to cause changes to the sex ratios of fish populations and to hinder sexual development and reproduction in several vertebrate groups (Depledge and Billinghurst, 1999). Diverse marine invertebrates, including mollusks and arthropods, have been found to be sensitive to endocrine disruption (Depledge and Billinghurst, 1999). Endocrine disruption is of particular concern in the effort to monitor and regulate water pollution, as pollutants may produce reproduction-disrupting endocrine effects 3 even at low concentrations that do not result in outright toxicity (Depledge and Billinghurst, 1999). Little is yet known about the potential synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects of multiple endocrine-disrupting contaminants—despite the fact that most contaminated water sources contain multiple contaminants, and contaminants cannot be expected to appear in isolation in ecologically relevant environments (Depledge and Billinghurst, 1999; Standley et al., 2008). When Thorpe et al. studied the combined effects of nonylphenol and ethynylestradiol in developing rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), they found an additive response on increasing vitellogenin concentrations in the trouts’ blood plasma (2001). Given that steroid hormone receptors appear to be widely conserved in bilatarians, it is of interest to see if additive effects of endocrine-disrupting contamination are also observed in invertebrate members of impacted ecosystems. In this study, I investigated the effects of ethynylestradiol, an artificial estrogen manufactured as an oral contraceptive and present in wastewater, and nonylphenol, an estrogen- mimicking contaminant released from plastics and used as an industrial surfactant (Swartz et al., 2006; Soares, 2008), on the growth rate and mictic/amictic ratios of rotifer populations, and on the size of their eggs. I examined the effects of these contaminants in and above environmental concentrations, as well as their potential effects in combination. Given that monogonot rotifers appear to have active estrogen-like receptors localized to their reproductive structures (Jones et al., 2017), I expected that their reproductive cycles would be influenced by exposure to the estrogen agonists ethynylestradiol and nonylphenol. Based on the work of Preston et al. (2000) and Radix et al., (2001), if the compounds were to have any effect, I would have expected them to lower population growth rates, however, I was uncertain as 4 to whether any effect would be seen at environmental-level concentrations. As the estrogen hormone signaling pathway is deeply conserved between rotifers and vertebrates (Jones et al., 2017), I expected that, as in the case of the rainbow trout, a combination of contaminants would have a greater effect than would each contaminant alone (Thorpe et al., 2001). Methods I reared Brachionus manjavacas rotifers under eleven chemical treatments: a control without added contaminants; a control to which only ethanol was added; three treatments to which 4-nonylphenol (Standard grade, Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee USA) was added dissolved in ethanol to concentrations of 1 ug/L (0.0045 uM), 5 ug/L (0.0227 uM), and 50 ug/L (0.2273 uM); three treatments to which 17α-ethynylestradiol (> 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee USA) was added to concentrations of 1 ng/L (3.378x10-6 uM), 5 ng/L (1.689x10-5 uM), and 50 ng/L (1.689x10-4 uM); and three additional treatments with both 4-nonylphenol and 17α- ethynylestradiol in combination. In the treatments with both 4-nonylphenol and 17α- ethynylestradiol, one treatment contained 4-nonylphenol at a concentration of 1 ug/L and 17α- ethynylestradiol at a concentration of 1 ng/L, while the next contained 5 ug/L 4-nonylphenol and 5 ng/L 17α-ethynylestradiol,