Life History and Habitat Requirements of the Oregon Forestsnail, Allogona Townsendiana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life History and Habitat Requirements of the Oregon Forestsnail, Allogona Townsendiana Invertebrate Biology ]](]]): 1–11. r 2009, The Authors Journal compilation r 2009, The American Microscopical Society, Inc. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2009.00168.x Life history and habitat requirements of the Oregon forestsnail, Allogona townsendiana (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Polygyridae), in a British Columbia population Karen M.M. Steensma,1,a Patrick L. Lilley,1,2 and Heather M. Zandberg1 1 Department of Biology, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada V2Y 1Y1 2 A Rocha Canada, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 9R3 Abstract. Population size, reproductive timing and habitats, seasonal behaviors, and juvenile activity were assessed in a British Columbia population of the endangered Oregon forestsnail, Allogona townsendiana, over a period of 4 years. Adult snail population size ranged from seven to 47 snails in four  24-m2 sampling sites. The mating period peaked in March and April; adults aggregated in clusters of eight to 14 snails before mating. Pairs of snails were observed to mate for 225 min or more in close proximity to coarse woody debris and stinging nettle, Urtica dioica. Nesting peaked in April–May and resulted in a mean clutch size of 34 eggs (SD 5 9). Hatching for two nests occurred at 63 and 64 d after oviposition. Within hours of hatching, juveniles began dispersing from the nest site; by 1 month most had disappeared. Snails tracked with harmonic radar became less active or aestivated from late July to early September and hibernated from early November to mid-March within leaf litter and soil. Preliminary measurements of growth rate indicate this species takes a minimum of 2 years to reach adulthood and has a typical life span of at least 5 years. Additional key words: conservation, endangered species, harmonic radar, land snail Conservation of terrestrial gastropods has become ecosystems (Prezio et al. 1999; Ovaska & Sopuck of increasing concern in recent years as population 2005). Understanding the life history of a gastropod declines and disappearances continue to be docu- species is therefore crucial not only for conservation mented (Lydeard et al. 2004; Steinitz et al. 2005). of the particular species, but also for broader protec- Urbanization, forestry practices, and other anth- tion of the ecosystem. Ignorance of life cycles, food ropogenic changes, including habitat destruction and web roles, and other ecological features of molluscs introductions of exotic predators, can have strong leaves gaps in overall knowledge of entire ecosystems negative effects on snails with a limited range and and their health, to the detriment of ecosystem man- low-dispersal abilities (Strayer et al. 1986; Baur & agement (Tilman et al. 1994; Poiani et al. 2000). In- Baur 1990; DellaSala et al. 1999; Prezio et al. 1999; deed, the connection between individual species, Hylander et al. 2004). Terrestrial gastropod conserva- ecosystem health, and human health is an important tion is important for several reasons: (1) Land snails point for public education regarding gastropods and and slugs play a significant role in decomposition and other molluscs (Rapport et al. 1998; Horwitz et al. other food web processes (Mason 1970; Richter 1979; 2001; Lydeard et al. 2004). Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in The Oregon forestsnail, Allogona townsendiana Canada [COSEWIC] 2002); (2) they often serve as LEA 1838 (Pulmonata, Polygyridae), is one of few dispersers of plant seeds and important fungal spores large land snails endemic to Pacific Northwest (Richter 1980; Gervais et al. 1998); and (3) they con- coastal forests of North America (Forsyth 2004). tribute to the overall biodiversity and health of eco- The species has been documented from the Willam- logical communities (Richter 1979, 1980). ette Valley of Oregon, the Puget Trough of Wash- Studies in various habitats suggest that terrestrial ington State, and the lower Fraser Valley of British gastropods may serve as critical indicator species for Columbia (BC) (COSEWIC 2002). The current glo- bal status of this species is G3G4 (rounded status: G3—vulnerable) (NatureServe 2008), and it was des- a Author for correspondence. ignated endangered by the Committee on the Status E-mail: [email protected] of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in 2 Steensma, Lilley, & Zandberg Fig. 1. Location of study site (Trinity Western University Eco- system Study Area near Fort Langley, BC) and other known occurrences of populations of Allogona townsendiana in Canada (Source: British Columbia Con- servation Data Centre). November 2002. Remaining populations are highly Methods fragmented and lie within heavily populated areas subject to urban and agricultural development. Con- Study area servation of A. townsendiana is particularly impera- tive in Canada, as BC populations of this species exist Populations of Allogona townsendiana have been at the northern limits of their range, which may in- identified at several locations in southwestern BC, crease the likelihood that they are genetically distinct including the Ecosystem Study Area (ESA) of Trinity and possess unique ecological adaptations (Scudder Western University (TWU) (Fig. 1). The TWU ESA 1989). near Langley, BC (49.141N, 122.601W) consists of Despite its conservation status, the ecology of the B50 ha of diverse habitats, including riparian areas, Oregon forestsnail is poorly understood. Populations wet meadows, ponds, and mixed conifer–deciduous appear to exist primarily in remnant moist, mixed second-growth forests with large numbers of bigleaf conifer–deciduous forests with open meadows. maple (Acer macrophyllum). The presence of A. town- Further inland it exists only in sheltered ravines and sendiana was first documented at this site in the mid- riparian areas (Kozloff 1976). Members of A. town- 1990s; the population appears to be relatively large sendiana have also been associated with stinging net- (COSEWIC 2002; BC Conservation Data Centre tle (Urtica dioica), although the exact nature of the 2008). The TWU population is well west of sizeable relationship is unknown (Waldock 2002; Forsyth populations at Chilliwack and Agassiz, and is one of 2004). Distribution appears to be patchy throughout only a few populations that exist in protected areas the range (COSEWIC 2002). (BC Conservation Data Centre 2008). The TWU Current conservation planning for A. townsendi- population exists partially on land that is covenan- ana is based on speculation about the habitat require- ted under the BC Ministry of Environment, due to ments at different life history stages. Though a the salmon-producing streams that run through the Recovery Strategy is being prepared in compliance campus, thus shielding it from direct development with Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA), no pre- impacts (K.M.M. Steensma & H.M. Silveira, unpubl. vious work exists regarding mating, nesting, juve- data). niles, or seasonal location. This information is a Preliminary surveys, begun in 2000, led to map- crucial precursor to understanding what factors limit ping of the TWU snail populations using GIS in 2003 population distribution and affect long-term viabil- (Silveira 2004). Four areas separated by 50 m ity. We sought to investigate key habitat require- within B10-ha area were identified for study during ments at important seasonal and life history stages preliminary surveys. Field surveys took place from including reproduction, migration, and hibernation. 2003 to 2007 and focused in habitats along existing This article presents an overview of our findings on trails and in previously identified off-trail areas, with the life history of A. townsendiana. care taken to limit damage to snails and their habitat. Invertebrate Biology vol. ]], no. ]], ]] 2009 Life history in Allogona townsendiana 3 Initial estimation of snail densities in four primary Tester (Model HB-2, Kel Instruments Co., Inc., subpopulation sites in 2004 was followed up with Wyckoff, NJ, USA); relative humidity was measured studies of mating, nesting, and juvenile habitats and using a Bacharach Sling Psychrometer (Model 12- behavior through 2006. We tracked movements of 9015, Bacharach Inc., New Kensington, PA, USA). snails using a harmonic direction finder from 2005 to 2007. Nesting Surveys for nesting snails were undertaken 2–3  Population estimates and size distribution per week from the discovery of the first nest until Densities of individuals were assessed within four nests were no longer located. Nests were located 24-m2 sampling sites using the Jolly–Seber mark and when snails were discovered in the process of ovipos- recapture technique (Krebs 1989). Sites were iting. For all nests, we recorded the general location searched for individuals for 30 min each on five con- and substrate. We also counted the number of eggs as secutive days (June 8–12, 2004), with a 24-h interval soon after oviposition as possible. between each sampling event. Each site was sampled at approximately the same time every day: site 1 at Laboratory observations 09:00 hours, site 2 at 10:00 hours, site 3 at 11:30 Detailed observations of a single mating pair in hours, and site 4 at 13:30 hours. We measured the captivity were made on August 10, 2005. Snails were shell diameter of each snail found and on first capture kept in a 4.7-L Penn Plex aquarium with lid, set up to marked them for individual recognition. We applied simulate natural habitat as closely as possible. Wet marks on the portion of shell furthest from the aper- paper towels were used to retain moisture, and water ture, using black permanent marker and a coat of was misted by spray bottle twice per day. Pieces of clear, quick-dry nail enamel to seal the ink. The snails stinging nettle and other vegetative material were were then returned to their original capture locations. provided for food, and the enclosure was cleaned of The weather across the entire 5-d sampling period excess food daily, with paper toweling replaced twice was consistently mild and dry. For each sample site, weekly. The aquarium was kept at 151–181C, and the computer program JOLLY (USGS Patuxent near a window to provide natural day length.
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian Tree Snails (Partula Spp)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian tree snails (Partula spp) Edition 1.0 Publication date June 2019 Partula Snail EEP Species Committee Editor Dave Clarke, ZSL 2019_Partula sp_EAZA Best Practice Guidelines EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian tree snails (Partula spp) Terrestrial Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group TITAG Chair: Mark Bushell, Bristol Zoo Gardens, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 3HA [email protected] TITAG Vice-Chairs: Tamás Papp, Chester Zoo, Moston Rd, Upton, Chester CH2 1EU. [email protected] & Vítek Lukáš, Zoo Praha, U Trojského zámku 3/120, 171 00 Praha 7, Czechia. [email protected] EEP Co-ordinator: Paul Pearce-Kelly, ZSL [email protected] EEP Studbook keeper: Sam Aberdeen, ZSL [email protected] Edition 1.0 Publication date June 2019 (based on global Management Guidelines document Nov 2007 eds Pearce-Kelly, Blake, Goellner & Snider) Editor Dave Clarke, ZSL [email protected] Citation - Clarke, D., EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Partula snails. EAZA 2019 We acknowledge the invaluable input of all Partula snail EEP Species Committee members, SSP colleagues and global participating Partula collections. EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (June 2019) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry of the Carnivorous Land Snail, Powelliphanta Augusta (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Rhytdidae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington Husbandry of the Carnivorous Land Snail, Powelliphanta augusta (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Rhytdidae) By Thomas Edward Allan A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecological Restoration Victoria University of Wellington 2010 1 Abstract Key aspects of the captive husbandry of Powelliphanta augusta, a newly-described New Zealand land snail are investigated: how they should be managed and fed to provide individuals for release, and how a long-term captive population can be maintained as an insurance against extinction in the wild. This project arises from almost all members of this species having been brought into captivity due to their displacement in the wild by an opencast coalmine. Powelliphanta (F: Rhytididae) is a genus of endemic carnivorous snails, which includes 10 species, 27 subspecies and numerous undescribed taxa. As well as its diversity, Powelliphanta is renowned for the large size of its members (up to 90mm diameter) and their attractively-patterned shells. Most taxa are threatened due to habitat loss and predation by introduced mammalian predators. The study commences with a literature review to refine husbandry methods and to assess requirements for captive breeding of snails. From this review investigations are made into stocking densities, substrate, reproductive biology, body condition and growth of the P. augusta captive population. To determine an appropriate stocking density for P. augusta groups of six snails were kept at two densities; with either 720cm2, or 1440cm2 per group.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Status of Native Carnivorous Land Snails in The
    5. Results 5.1 SUMMARY OF SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS The distribution database contains 1187 locality records, 927 for Rhytida and 260 for Wainuia, including some duplicates. Six percent of all records are of subfossils, mostly from cave deposits. Fig. 2 shows the combined occurrence of all species by 10 000 m x 10 000 m grid square. At least one species was recorded from 406 grid squares (391 excluding subfossil records). Rhytida species were recorded in 333 squares (318 excluding subfossils) and Wainuia species in 94 squares (90 excluding subfossils). The number of 10 000 m x 10 000 m grid squares containing records of each species or subspecies ranged from 2 to 105 (Table 1). Subfossil records extended the known range to additional grid squares in 12 of the 17 taxa. Generalised range maps for all taxa are presented for quick reference in Fig. 3. The distributions are mapped in detail in Fig. 4 (see Appendix 4) and discussed in the species accounts (Appendix 4). 5.2 ASSESSMENT OF CONSERVATION STATUS Data relevant to conservation status are discussed in the species notes (Appendix 4). Direct assessment of population trends is not currently possible as no population study has been conducted for any species of Wainuia or Rhytida. A tentative priority ranking was therefore performed using the scoring system adopted for other invertebrates in Department of Conservation (1994b). The results provide a coarse and somewhat subjective indication of conservation priorities (Table 2). They can be criticised for failing to adequately incorporate uncertainty in our present knowledge, and for not identifying critically threatened populations within some species or subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plans for Powelliphanta Land Snails
    Recovery plans for Powelliphanta land snails 2003–2013 THREATENED SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN 49 By Kath Walker Published by: Department of Conservation P O Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand Illustrations Front cover: Powelliphanta lignaria lignaria. Photograph by Rod Morris. Back cover: Variety of Powelliphanta species. Photograph by Gideon Climo. Cartoon p. vii: Andrew Jeffs Line drawing p. ix: Powelliphanta superba mouatae by Pauline Morse Species identification photographs by Gideon Climo, Kath Walker and Tim Skinner. Species distribution maps and snail identification photographs prepared for publication by Graeme Elliott © Copyright June 2003, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1170-3806 ISBN 0–478–22418–4 This work may be cited as: Walker, K. J. 2003: Recovery plans for Powelliphanta land snails. Threatened Species Recovery Plan 49. Department of Conservation, Wellington, x + 208 p. + 64 plates. CONTENTS Abstract 1 1. Background 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 How many species are there? 3 1.3 The biology and ecology of Powelliphanta 4 1.4 Are Powelliphanta populations declining? 5 1.5 Causes of snail decline 6 1.5.1 Habitat destruction 6 1.5.2 Predators 6 1.6 Are translocations a solution to snail decline? 8 1.7 Current conservation status 9 2. Powelliphanta recovery plan scope, goal and issues 10 3. The recovery plans 13 3.1 Powelliphanta marchanti 14 3.2 Powelliphanta “Maungaharuru” 19 3.3 Powelliphanta traversi traversi 23 3.4 Powelliphanta traversi florida 27 3.5 Powelliphanta traversi latizona 29 3.6 Powelliphanta traversi tararuaensis
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: a Phylogeographic Approach
    297 Insects 2011, 2, 297-325; doi:10.3390/insects2030297 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: A Phylogeographic Approach Steven A. Trewick 1,*, Graham P. Wallis 2 and Mary Morgan-Richards 1 1 Phoenix Lab, Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin North 9016, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +64 6 356 9099 ext. 2021; Fax: +64 6 350 5623. Received: 11 May 2011; in revised form: 16 June 2011 / Accepted: 17 June 2011 / Published: 1 July 2011 Abstract: Phylogeography contributes to our knowledge of regional biotas by integrating spatial and genetic information. In New Zealand, comprising two main islands and hundreds of smaller ones, phylogeography has transformed the way we view our biology and allowed comparison with other parts of the world. Here we review studies on New Zealand terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates. We find little evidence of congruence among studies of different taxa; instead there are signatures of partitioning in many different regions and expansion in different directions. A number of studies have revealed unusually high genetic distances within putative species, and in those where other data confirm this taxonomy, the revealed phylogeographic structure contrasts with northern hemisphere continental systems. Some taxa show a signature indicative of Pliocene tectonic events encompassing land extension and mountain building, whereas others are consistent with range expansion following the last glacial maximum (LGM) of the Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Website Copy 2010, Fnz
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa Barker, G.M. 1999: Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Fauna of New Zealand 38, 253 pp. IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 299.8KB .Pdf File
    https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1972.33.13 7 February 1972 TASMANIAN SNAIL REFERRED TO THE GENUS VICTAPHANTA (STYLOMMATOPHORA: PARYPHANTIDAE) By Brian J. Smith Curator of Invertebrates, National Museum of Victoria, and R. C. Kershaw Honorary Associate, Queen Victoria Museum, Launceston, Tasmania Abstract The genus Melavitrina Iredale (1933) is placed in the synonymy of Victaphanta Iredale (1933) and the distribution of the three species of Victaphanta is discussed. The anatomy of the Tasmanian species Victaphanta milligani (Pfeiffer 1853) is described. Introduction mouth' and the surface is shining black. How- ever, the slight enlargement of the last whorl Following recent work on the Victorian compared to the two Victorian Victaphanta paryphantid genus Victaphanta Iredale 1933 species is here considered of specific signifi- (Smith 1969, 1970), the closely similar group cance. The shell being thin, composed mainly of snails from W. Tasmania belonging to the of conchin with very little calcareous material, genus Melavitrina Iredale 1933 were consider- umbilicus nearly closed, glossy with the inner ed. Two species are described for the genus, whorls white to yellow and outer whorl dark M. milligani Pfeiffer (1854) and M. jumosa brown, are all features of the genus Victa- Tenison-Woods (1878) and these have often phanta. been closely compared to the Victaphanta species (Tenison-Woods 1878, Murdoch 1904, With the inclusion of the Tasmanian species Cox and Hedley Davies Iredale's 1911, 1912). in Victaphanta, the number of species increases (1933) description of Melavitrina was not to three and gives a circum-Bass Strait distri- considered sufficient to separate these species bution for the genus (PI.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Museum in Linz (Austria): History of Curatorial and Educational Activities Concerning Molluscs, Checklists and Profiles of Main Contributers
    The mollusc collection at the Upper Austrian Museum in Linz (Austria): History of curatorial and educational activities concerning molluscs, checklists and profiles of main contributers E r n a A ESCHT & A g n e s B ISENBERGER Abstract: The Biology CentRe of the UppeR AuStRian MuSeum in Linz (OLML) haRbouRS collectionS of “diveRSe inveRtebRateS“ excluding inSectS fRom moRe than two centuRieS. ThiS cuRatoRShip exiStS Since 1992, Since 1998 tempoRaRily SuppoRted by a mol- luSc SpecialiSt. A hiStoRical SuRvey of acceSSion policy, muSeum’S RemiSeS, and cuRatoRS iS given StaRting fRom 1833. OuR publica- tion activitieS conceRning malacology, papeRS Related to the molluSc collection and expeRienceS on molluSc exhibitionS aRe Sum- maRiSed. The OLML holdS moRe than 105,000 RecoRded, viz laRgely well documented, about 3000 undeteRmined SeRieS and type mateRial of oveR 12,000 nominal molluSc taxa. ImpoRtant contRibuteRS to the pRedominantly gaStRopod collection aRe KaRl WeS- Sely (1861–1946), JoSef GanSlmayR (1872–1950), Stephan ZimmeRmann (1896–1980), WalteR Klemm (1898–1961), ERnSt Mikula (1900–1970), FRitz Seidl (1936–2001) and ChRiSta FRank (maRRied FellneR; *1951). Between 1941 and 1944 the Nazi Regime con- fiScated fouR monaSteRieS, i.e. St. FloRian, WilheRing, Schlägl and Vyšší BRod (HohenfuRth), including alSo molluScS, which have been tRanSfeRRed to Linz and lateR paRtially ReStituted. A contRact diScoveRed in the Abbey Schlägl StRongly SuggeStS that about 12,000 SpecimenS containS “duplicateS” (poSSibly SyntypeS) of SpecieS intRoduced in the 18th centuRy by Ignaz von BoRn and Johann CaRl MegeRle von Mühlfeld. On hand of many photogRaphS, paRticulaRly of taxa Sized within millimeteR RangeS and opeR- ated by the Stacking technique (including thoSe endangeRed in UppeR AuStRia), eigth tableS giving an oveRview on peRSonS involved in buidling the collection and liStS of countRieS and geneRa contained, thiS aRticle intendS to open the molluSc collec- tion of a pRovincial muSeum foR the inteRnational public.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the New Zealand Landsnails Referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the Introduc
    Tuhinga 19: 57–167 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2008) A revision of the New Zealand landsnails referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the introduction of three new genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Charopidae) BrUce A. Marshall1 and Gary M. Barker2 1 MUseUm of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) 2 Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand ([email protected]) ABSTRACT: The New Zealand species referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 during the last 60 years are evaluated. A total of 60 species are recognised, of which 37 are described as new. The taxa are described, they are illustrated by colour photographs and scanning electron microscope images, their distributions are described and mapped, and their biology and con- servation are briefly discussed. Pseudallodiscus tataensis Climo, 1971 is referred to Allodiscus [s. lat.]. Three new genera are introduced: Granallodisus (for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and two new species), Costallodiscus (for three new species) and Canallodiscus (for Allodiscus fectoloides Dell, 1955, Phelussa elliottae Gardner, 1968 and a new species). Hirsutodiscus Climo, 1971 is elevated to generic status. Lectotypes are designated for Helix dimorpha Reeve, 1852, Pitys cryptobidens Suter, 1891, Helix venulata L. Pfeiffer, 1857, Nanina tullia Gray, 1850 and Psyra godeti Suter, 1891. Neotypes are designated for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and Charopa miranda Hutton, 1883. KEYWORDS: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Charopidae, Allodiscus, Pseudallodiscus, Granallodisus, Costallodiscus, Canallodiscus, Hirsutodiscus, revision, taxonomy, distribution, new taxa, new combinations, lectotypes, neotypes. recognised but presently undescribed species. This paper Introduction addresses the systematics of New Zealand landsnails, includ- New Zealand has a diverse landsnail fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Molluscan Research
    Publishing Molluscan Research Volume 22, 2002 © Malacological Society of Australasia All enquiries should be directed to: Molluscan Research CSIRO Publishing PO Box 1139 (150 Oxford St) Collingwood, Vic. 3066, Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7629 Fax: +61 3 9662 7611 Email: [email protected] Published by CSIRO Publishing for the Malacological Society of Australasia www.publish.csiro.au/journals/mr Molluscan Research, 2002, 22, 203–220 Growth and development of the rare land snail Paryphanta busbyi watti (Eupulmonata : Rhytididae) I. A. N. StringerA,F, M. J. McLeanB, G. C. ArnoldC, S. M. BassettD and R. MontefioreE AScience and Research Unit, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, Wellington, New Zealand. BThe Ecology Centre, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia. CInstitute of Information Science and Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. DInstitute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. EDeceased. FTo whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] Abstract The rare carnivorous land snail Paryphanta busbyi watti was investigated by following marked snails over a study period of 6.3 years. Large snails were fitted with harmonic radar transponders to aid in locating them. This species is iteroparous and has determinate growth. Shells had maximum diameters of 49.6–61.2 mm. Two to eight large eggs, representing 5%–23% of the live weight of a snail, were laid at a rate of one to two per day over 2–5 days. These eggs were deposited in one to three holes dug in soil by the snails. A newly laid egg was surrounded by an adhesive membrane, which disappeared after a few days, exposing the calcareous shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Land-Snail Shells in Near-Ultraviolet, Visible and Near-Infrared
    Journal of The Malacological Society of London Molluscan Studies Journal of Molluscan Studies (2013) 79: 95–111. doi:10.1093/mollus/eys039 Advance Access publication date: 29 January 2013 OBSERVATIONS ON LAND-SNAIL SHELLS IN NEAR-ULTRAVIOLET, VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED RADIATION Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mollus/article/79/2/95/1072615 by guest on 23 September 2021 ENRICO SAVAZZI1 AND TAKENORI SASAKI2 1School of Geosciences, Monash University, Building 28, Victoria 3800, Australia; and 2The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Correspondence: Enrico Savazzi, Hagelgra¨nd 8, 75646 Uppsala, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected] (Received 18 March 2013; accepted 28 November 2012) ABSTRACT The shells of a broad range of land snails were digitally imaged in the near-ultraviolet (NUV), visible range (VIS) and near infrared (NIR). NIR images were recorded in both incident and trans- mitted illumination. In most cases, shell and periostracal pigmentation observed in the VIS was com- pletely translucent in the NIR, while its contrast was enhanced in the NUV. Exceptions to the above rule fit into four main categories. (1) Snails with green or tan shells or periostraca, presumably func- tional as camouflage among vegetation, were often highly absorbing in the NUV, thus matching the optical characteristics of green vegetation in this range. (2) Pigmented spiral stripes in the shells of several Camaenidae and Helicidae were adjacent to nonpigmented areas that display a heightened reflectivity and reduced translucence in the VIS and NIR. This enhanced the contrast of the colour pattern in the VIS, but appeared to lack functions in the NIR.
    [Show full text]