A Tribute to Max Von Laue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Tribute to Max Von Laue FEATURES A Tribute to Max von Laue Henk Kubbinga, University of Groningen (The Netherlands) DOI: 10.1051/epn/2012602 20 EPN 43/6 Article available at http://www.europhysicsnews.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epn/2012602 MAX VON LAUE FEATURES Just an idea: take a crystal, surround it with photographic plates, and direct a pencil of X-rays at it, perpendicularly. It was one of those thrilling ideas that made new science. Max Laue was the proponent, in April 1912. The experiment as such had been tried out before by Röntgen himself, but without avail. Friedrich and Knipping, however, took their time and waited long enough. Overnight, the atomic variant of lattice theory—which had worked its way at the outskirts of crystallography—became fashionable. And, not to forget, X-rays proved to be wave-like indeed. ax Laue originated from Pfaffendorf, Rays and rays and… X-rays b P.18: Blende (ZnS; a village now part of Koblenz. After At the turn of the XIXth and XXth century a whole series covered with calcite) from Trepca (Serbia). his Abitur he enrolled at the university of seemingly distinct, though more or less related radia- Aquarelle by Claus of Strasbourg, moving on, in 1899, to tion phenomena disputed each other's priority in the Caspari (1911-1980). Göttingen, the place to be for theoreticians. Optics physicists' attention. One of the most enigmatic was, Reproduced from M H. Schröcke and became his favourite subject. Waldemar Voigt and without doubt, the one revealed by Wilhelm Röntgen in K.l. Weiner, Otto Lummer showed the way to go. His PhD sub- the fall of 1896. For the general public, however, it had Mineralien (Hamburg: ject brought him to Berlin to study with Max Planck. been overshadowed, by some natural rays, spontane- E. Cramer, 1967). In 1903 Laue defended a thesis about the diffraction ously emitted by materials that could be concentrated which occurs during interference caused by plane by chemical means. Laue got involved in 1909 when he parallel plates. It was Planck who asked him, in 1906, entered, as a Privatdozent, in the service of Arnold Som- to become his assistant. Laue's Habilitation assessed merfeld, at the University of Munich. Sommerfeld him- the entropy of interfering pencils of rays. It was the self had been nominated a few years before to provide time that one Albert Einstein's freshly appeared paper the theoretical background to Röntgen's rays. Röntgen 'Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper' was favorably was still around, but left Sommerfeld and the latter's stu- discussed by Planck in a lecture at the Colloquium of dents free to use his instruments, among which a 50 cm Berlin's Physical Society. Rühmkorff-inductor and a whole collection of bulbs. Relativity: theory and experiment Lattice theory in crystallography Laue was in the audience. It took some time, but his con- The 19th century had lived with the rise of lattice theo- version was unconditional. He went to see Einstein in ry. Crystals had been conceived of, by René-Juste Haüy Switzerland, soon after his Habilitation, to discuss details. (1743-1822), as well-ordered 'assemblages' of polyhedral His was one of the first experimental arguments if not proofs (1907), in the sense that he identified Einstein's 'ad- dition theorem' with a formula derived by Fizeau (1851) for the velocity of light in flowing water. Fizeau, it is re- called, first established (together with Foucault) that in denser media light is slowed down—in conformity with the wave-theory—while the motion of some such medium may be used to move an interference pattern: the fringes produced by coherent light led through the two arms of a water circuitry slightly shifted when the flow direction was changed. Fizeau did not insist and left others the task to improve his method. It was Michelson and Morley who did so in 1887. There were some problems with the turbu- lence of the flowing water and Pieter Zeeman, therefore, used a movable glass stick instead. Laue produced the first general account of the recent developments in Das Rela- tivitätsprinzip (1911) and succeeded in familiarizing many an estranged physicist with the broad context—and the paradoxes—of what came to be known as special relativ- b FIG. 1: Max von ity. In 1920 he would publish, as a supplement, a similar Laue (1920; courtesy account of Einstein's latest breakthrough, general relativity. Nobel Foundation). EPN 43/6 21 FEATURES MAX VON LAUE molecules composed of the atoms of the elements. Those of the exact number of a priori possible atomic lattices (230) pyrite, for instance, were presented as 'assemblages' of cubic was rigorously deduced by mathematicians like Evgrad FeS2-molecules. Such 'assemblages' could take the form of Fyodorov and Arthur Schönflies. When Laue arrived in a cube or orthogonal parallellepiped, naturally, but also Munich Sohncke's spirit was still in the air, while the lat- that of a dodecahedron or octahedron, depending on the ter's lattice models had survived and were regularly used regularities during the growth. It was a personal triumph in classes. There was a third lucky coincidence. for Haüy not only that the interfacial angles could be cal- culated in advance, but also that they agreed closely with Encyclopedia of the mathematical sciences those measured on natural crystals, for instance, in the case Felix Klein and Sommerfeld had launched, in 1896, the of dodecahedral pyrite. His successors gradually replaced great Encyclopedia of the mathematical sciences, which the molecules by their centres of gravity. In this way the became the indispensable toolkit for any physicist, let's crystal became an abstract point lattice whose symmetry say, together with the ever growing Physikalisch-Chemis- properties defied the imagination of men like Delafosse, che Tabellen of Landolt and Börnstein. Once established Bravais and Jordan. Particular compounds, like the alums, in Munich, Laue was chartered to assess the theory and though, suggested the existence of superimposed molecular practice of wave-optics and had, naturally, amongst many lattices: after all, the crystal water of these so-called hydrates other things, to assess interference phenomena [1]. That could be easily separated from the rest, while a crystal of wave-optics was part of volume V of the Encyclopedia…, the original form emerged on evaporating a solution. It which for all kind of reasons—i.a. the Great War—would was Leonhard Sohncke (1842-1897) who concluded, in not appear in print before the 1920's. The text, it is true, 1888, that any crystal could be considered as an array of as only assessed line gratings, but during its preparation many lattices as there are atomic species in it. In the 1890's Laue had become familiar with experiments with crossed gratings, when square arrays of identical spots show up, . FIG. 2: The original set-up as used by Friedrich and Knipping to see the effect of X-rays on a copper square spots, that is. The stage was set. sulfate crystal. From left to right on the table: Röntgen bulb (too low here), first diaphragm (lead foil), collimator, round turntable with the crystal at its centre and an enveloped photographic plate. A huge wooden tripod is used to rise and reset a shielding cover of lead foil. Since 1921 this set-up is part of the Crystals and X-rays collection of the Deutsches Museum, München (courtesy: Deutsches Museum). Having finished his Encyclopedia… contribution, it oc- curred to Laue, early in 1912, that something interesting might happen when a pencil of X-rays would be directed at a crystal, the more so since the estimated wavelength of Röntgen's rays (on spectral grounds: 10-8-10-9 cm) was equal if not smaller than the interatomic distance (10-8 cm). An exchange of ideas, in February 1912, with Paul Ewald triggered a wider discussion at the Institute. An experiment, then, was staged, by Walther Friedrich and Paul Knipping. In a search for effects an easily grown copper sulphate crys- tal (triclinic) was first bombarded with X-rays, with pho- tographic plates at various positions around it (Figure 2). They found that a plate behind the crystal manifested distinct black spots suggesting some kind of regularity. It was a small step, then, to replace the raw crystallized copper sulphate crystal by a thin 001 platelet of highly symmetric zinc sulfide (thickness: 0.5 mm; Figure 3). The result was a breathtakingly regular pattern of spots, manifesting the same symmetry elements as those deduced earlier for the crystal itself (Figure 4): a fourfold main ro- tation axis and four twofold rotation axes (four planes of symmetry). On enlarging the distance between the crystal and the photographic plate (say, P5 instead of P4), the spots kept their bigness and form, though the scale of the pattern was enlarged in the same proportion: apparently a parallel beam of rays was responsible for each spot. In the publica- tion Laue would show how the distance between the cen- tres of gravity of two neighbouring ZnS-molecules could be calculated, using the density ρ = 4.06 g.cm-3, the molar 23 weight M = 97.4 g and Avogadro's constant, NA = 6.17×10 : 22 EPN 43/6 MAX VON LAUE FEATURES [97.4/{4.06×(6.17×1023)}]⅓ = 3.38×10-8 cm. This would be the lattice constant. It brought Laue, Friedrich and Knipping instantaneous fame. In 1913 and, again, in 1914, Laue was nominated for the Nobel Prize for Physics. There were but few nominations, it is true, but these were enough for the Selection Committee to decide in 1914 in favor of Laue.
Recommended publications
  • Hendrik Antoon Lorentz's Struggle with Quantum Theory A. J
    Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Archive for History of Exact Sciences ISSN 0003-9519 Volume 67 Number 2 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149-170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 1 23 Your article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works, as long as the author of the original work is cited. You may self- archive this article on your own website, an institutional repository or funder’s repository and make it publicly available immediately. 1 23 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149–170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Received: 15 June 2012 / Published online: 24 July 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A historical overview is given of the contributions of Hendrik Antoon Lorentz in quantum theory. Although especially his early work is valuable, the main importance of Lorentz’s work lies in the conceptual clarifications he provided and in his critique of the foundations of quantum theory. 1 Introduction The Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853–1928) is generally viewed as an icon of classical, nineteenth-century physics—indeed, as one of the last masters of that era. Thus, it may come as a bit of a surprise that he also made important contribu- tions to quantum theory, the quintessential non-classical twentieth-century develop- ment in physics. The importance of Lorentz’s work lies not so much in his concrete contributions to the actual physics—although some of his early work was ground- breaking—but rather in the conceptual clarifications he provided and his critique of the foundations and interpretations of the new ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Mistakes
    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing out the Dead Alison Abbott Reviews the Story of How a DNA Forensics Team Cracked a Grisly Puzzle
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT DADO RUVIC/REUTERS/CORBIS DADO A forensics specialist from the International Commission on Missing Persons examines human remains from a mass grave in Tomašica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. FORENSIC SCIENCE Bringing out the dead Alison Abbott reviews the story of how a DNA forensics team cracked a grisly puzzle. uring nine sweltering days in July Bosnia’s Million Bones tells the story of how locating, storing, pre- 1995, Bosnian Serb soldiers slaugh- innovative DNA forensic science solved the paring and analysing tered about 7,000 Muslim men and grisly conundrum of identifying each bone the million or more Dboys from Srebrenica in Bosnia. They took so that grieving families might find some bones. It was in large them to several different locations and shot closure. part possible because them, or blew them up with hand grenades. This is an important book: it illustrates the during those fate- They then scooped up the bodies with bull- unspeakable horrors of a complex war whose ful days in July 1995, dozers and heavy earth-moving equipment, causes have always been hard for outsiders to aerial reconnais- and dumped them into mass graves. comprehend. The author, a British journalist, sance missions by the Bosnia’s Million It was the single most inhuman massacre has the advantage of on-the-ground knowl- Bones: Solving the United States and the of the Bosnian war, which erupted after the edge of the war and of the International World’s Greatest North Atlantic Treaty break-up of Yugoslavia and lasted from 1992 Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP), an Forensic Puzzle Organization had to 1995, leaving some 100,000 dead.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect
    S´eminaire Poincar´e2 (2004) 1 – 16 S´eminaire Poincar´e 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect (QHE) A Personal View on the Discovery, Physics and Applications of this Quantum Effect Klaus von Klitzing Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Festk¨orperforschung Heisenbergstr. 1 D-70569 Stuttgart Germany 1 Historical Aspects The birthday of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) can be fixed very accurately. It was the night of the 4th to the 5th of February 1980 at around 2 a.m. during an experiment at the High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Grenoble. The research topic included the characterization of the electronic transport of silicon field effect transistors. How can one improve the mobility of these devices? Which scattering processes (surface roughness, interface charges, impurities etc.) dominate the motion of the electrons in the very thin layer of only a few nanometers at the interface between silicon and silicon dioxide? For this research, Dr. Dorda (Siemens AG) and Dr. Pepper (Plessey Company) provided specially designed devices (Hall devices) as shown in Fig.1, which allow direct measurements of the resistivity tensor. Figure 1: Typical silicon MOSFET device used for measurements of the xx- and xy-components of the resistivity tensor. For a fixed source-drain current between the contacts S and D, the potential drops between the probes P − P and H − H are directly proportional to the resistivities ρxx and ρxy. A positive gate voltage increases the carrier density below the gate. For the experiments, low temperatures (typically 4.2 K) were used in order to suppress dis- turbing scattering processes originating from electron-phonon interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Klaus Von Klitzing
    Curriculum Vitae Professor Dr. Klaus von Klitzing Name: Klaus von Klitzing Born: 28 June 1943 Major Scientific Interests: Solid State Research, Experimental Solid Physics, Low Dimensional Electron Systems, Quantum Hall Effect Nobel Prize in Physics 1985 Academic and Professional Career since 1985 Director at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research and Honorary Professor at Stuttgart University, Germany 1980 - 1984 Professor at the Technical University Munich, Germany 1978 Habilitation 1972 Ph.D. in Physics 1969 - 1980 University of Würzburg, Germany 1962 - 1969 Diploma in Physics Technical University Braunschweig, Germany Functions in Scientific Societies and Committees (Selection) 2011 Scientific Advisory Board Graphene Flagship 2008 Scientific Committee Bayer Climate Award Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina www.leopoldina.org 1 2007 EURAMET Research Council 2006 Board of Trustees “Institute of Advanced Studies” of TUM 2005 Jury Member START-Wittgenstein Program Austria 2005 Scientific Committee International Solvay Institutes 2000 NTT - Basic Research Laboratory Advisory Board 1992 Bord of Trustees of the German Museum Munich, Germany 1989 Bord of Trustees of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig Honours and Awarded Memberships (Selection) 2019 Member of Orden Pour le Mérite 2012 TUM Distinguished Affiliated Professor 2011 Honorary Degree of the National University of Mongolia 2011 Honorary Degree of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 2010 Honorary Member of the Deutsche Hochschulverband
    [Show full text]
  • Luis Alvarez: the Ideas Man
    CERN Courier March 2012 Commemoration Luis Alvarez: the ideas man The years from the early 1950s to the late 1980s came alive again during a symposium to commemorate the birth of one of the great scientists and inventors of the 20th century. Luis Alvarez – one of the greatest experimental physicists of the 20th century – combined the interests of a scientist, an inventor, a detective and an explorer. He left his mark on areas that ranged from radar through to cosmic rays, nuclear physics, particle accel- erators, detectors and large-scale data analysis, as well as particles and astrophysics. On 19 November, some 200 people gathered at Berkeley to commemorate the 100th anniversary of his birth. Alumni of the Alvarez group – among them physicists, engineers, programmers and bubble-chamber film scanners – were joined by his collaborators, family, present-day students and admirers, as well as scientists whose professional lineage traces back to him. Hosted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and the University of California at Berkeley, the symposium reviewed his long career and lasting legacy. A recurring theme of the symposium was, as one speaker put it, a “Shakespeare-type dilemma”: how could one person have accom- plished all of that in one lifetime? Beyond his own initiatives, Alvarez created a culture around him that inspired others to, as George Smoot put it, “think big,” as well as to “think broadly and then deep” and to take risks. Combined with Alvarez’s strong scientific standards and great care in execut- ing them, these principles led directly to the awarding of two Nobel Luis Alvarez celebrating the announcement of his 1968 Nobel prizes in physics to scientists at Berkeley – George Smoot in 2006 prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrico Fermi
    Fermi, Enrico Inventors and Inventions Enrico Fermi Italian American physicist Fermi helped develop Fermi-Dirac statistics, which liceo (secondary school) and, on the advice of Amidei, elucidate the group behavior of elementary particles. joined the Scuola Normale Superiore at Pisa. This elite He also developed the theory of beta decay and college, attached to the University of Pisa, admitted only discovered neutron-induced artificial radioactivity. forty of Italy’s top students, who were given free board Finally, he succeeded in producing the first sustained and lodging. Fermi performed exceedingly well in the nuclear chain reaction, which led to the discovery highly competitive entrance exam. He completed his of nuclear energy and the development of the university education after only four years of research and atomic bomb. studies, receiving his Ph.D. in physics from the Univer- sity of Pisa and his undergraduate diploma from the Born: September 29, 1901; Rome, Italy Scuola Normale Superiore in July, 1922. He became Died: November 28, 1954; Chicago, Illinois an expert theoretical physicist and a talented exper- Primary field: Physics imentalist. This rare combination provided a solid foun- Primary inventions: Controlled nuclear chain dation for all his subsequent inventions. reaction; Fermi-Dirac statistics; theory of beta decay Life’s Work After postdoctoral work at the University of Göttingen, Early Life in Germany (1922-1923), and the University of Leiden, Enrico Fermi (ehn-REE-koh FUR-mee) was the third in the Netherlands (fall, 1924), Fermi took an interim po- child of Alberto Fermi and Ida de Gattis. Enrico was very sition at the University of Florence in December, 1924.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific and Related Works of Chen Ning Yang
    Scientific and Related Works of Chen Ning Yang [42a] C. N. Yang. Group Theory and the Vibration of Polyatomic Molecules. B.Sc. thesis, National Southwest Associated University (1942). [44a] C. N. Yang. On the Uniqueness of Young's Differentials. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, 373 (1944). [44b] C. N. Yang. Variation of Interaction Energy with Change of Lattice Constants and Change of Degree of Order. Chinese J. of Phys. 5, 138 (1944). [44c] C. N. Yang. Investigations in the Statistical Theory of Superlattices. M.Sc. thesis, National Tsing Hua University (1944). [45a] C. N. Yang. A Generalization of the Quasi-Chemical Method in the Statistical Theory of Superlattices. J. Chem. Phys. 13, 66 (1945). [45b] C. N. Yang. The Critical Temperature and Discontinuity of Specific Heat of a Superlattice. Chinese J. Phys. 6, 59 (1945). [46a] James Alexander, Geoffrey Chew, Walter Salove, Chen Yang. Translation of the 1933 Pauli article in Handbuch der Physik, volume 14, Part II; Chapter 2, Section B. [47a] C. N. Yang. On Quantized Space-Time. Phys. Rev. 72, 874 (1947). [47b] C. N. Yang and Y. Y. Li. General Theory of the Quasi-Chemical Method in the Statistical Theory of Superlattices. Chinese J. Phys. 7, 59 (1947). [48a] C. N. Yang. On the Angular Distribution in Nuclear Reactions and Coincidence Measurements. Phys. Rev. 74, 764 (1948). 2 [48b] S. K. Allison, H. V. Argo, W. R. Arnold, L. del Rosario, H. A. Wilcox and C. N. Yang. Measurement of Short Range Nuclear Recoils from Disintegrations of the Light Elements. Phys. Rev. 74, 1233 (1948). [48c] C.
    [Show full text]
  • De Nobelprijzen Komen Eraan!
    De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! In de loop van volgende week worden de Nobelprijswinnaars van dit jaar aangekondigd. Daarna weten we wie in december deze felbegeerde prijzen in ontvangst mogen gaan nemen. De Nobelprijzen zijn wellicht de meest prestigieuze en bekende academische onderscheidingen ter wereld, maar waarom eigenlijk? Hoe zijn de prijzen ontstaan, en wie was hun grondlegger, Alfred Nobel? Afbeelding 1. Alfred Nobel.Alfred Nobel (1833-1896) was de grondlegger van de Nobelprijzen. Volgende week is de jaarlijkse aankondiging van de prijswinnaard. Alfred Nobel Alfred Nobel was een belangrijke negentiende-eeuwse Zweedse scheikundige en uitvinder. Hij werd geboren in Stockholm in 1833 in een gezin met acht kinderen. Zijn vader, Immanuel Nobel, was een werktuigkundige en uitvinder die succesvol was met het maken van wapens en stoommotoren. Immanuel wou dat zijn zonen zijn bedrijf zouden overnemen en stuurde Alfred daarom op een twee jaar durende reis naar onder andere Duitsland, Frankrijk en de Verenigde Staten, om te leren over chemische werktuigbouwkunde. In Parijs ontmoette bron: https://www.quantumuniverse.nl/de-nobelprijzen-komen-eraan Pagina 1 van 5 De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! Alfred de Italiaanse scheikundige Ascanio Sobrero, die drie jaar eerder het explosief nitroglycerine had ontdekt. Nitroglycerine had een veel grotere explosieve kracht dan het buskruit, maar was ook veel gevaarlijker om te gebruiken omdat het instabiel is. Alfred raakte geinteresseerd in nitroglycerine en hoe het gebruikt kon worden voor commerciele doeleinden, en ging daarom werken aan de stabiliteit en veiligheid van de stof. Een makkelijk project was dit niet, en meerdere malen ging het flink mis.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E • Nobel Prizes
    Appendix E • Nobel Prizes All Nobel Prizes in physics are listed (and marked with a P), as well as relevant Nobel Prizes in Chemistry (C). The key dates for some of the scientific work are supplied; they often antedate the prize considerably. 1901 (P) Wilhelm Roentgen for discovering x-rays (1895). 1902 (P) Hendrik A. Lorentz for predicting the Zeeman effect and Pieter Zeeman for discovering the Zeeman effect, the splitting of spectral lines in magnetic fields. 1903 (P) Antoine-Henri Becquerel for discovering radioactivity (1896) and Pierre and Marie Curie for studying radioactivity. 1904 (P) Lord Rayleigh for studying the density of gases and discovering argon. (C) William Ramsay for discovering the inert gas elements helium, neon, xenon, and krypton, and placing them in the periodic table. 1905 (P) Philipp Lenard for studying cathode rays, electrons (1898–1899). 1906 (P) J. J. Thomson for studying electrical discharge through gases and discover- ing the electron (1897). 1907 (P) Albert A. Michelson for inventing optical instruments and measuring the speed of light (1880s). 1908 (P) Gabriel Lippmann for making the first color photographic plate, using inter- ference methods (1891). (C) Ernest Rutherford for discovering that atoms can be broken apart by alpha rays and for studying radioactivity. 1909 (P) Guglielmo Marconi and Carl Ferdinand Braun for developing wireless telegraphy. 1910 (P) Johannes D. van der Waals for studying the equation of state for gases and liquids (1881). 1911 (P) Wilhelm Wien for discovering Wien’s law giving the peak of a blackbody spectrum (1893). (C) Marie Curie for discovering radium and polonium (1898) and isolating radium.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Stern Annalen 4.11.11
    (To be published by Annalen der Physik in December 2011) Otto Stern (1888-1969): The founding father of experimental atomic physics J. Peter Toennies,1 Horst Schmidt-Böcking,2 Bretislav Friedrich,3 Julian C.A. Lower2 1Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation Bunsenstrasse 10, 37073 Göttingen 2Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt 3Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin Keywords History of Science, Atomic Physics, Quantum Physics, Stern- Gerlach experiment, molecular beams, space quantization, magnetic dipole moments of nucleons, diffraction of matter waves, Nobel Prizes, University of Zurich, University of Frankfurt, University of Rostock, University of Hamburg, Carnegie Institute. We review the work and life of Otto Stern who developed the molecular beam technique and with its aid laid the foundations of experimental atomic physics. Among the key results of his research are: the experimental test of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular velocities (1920), experimental demonstration of space quantization of angular momentum (1922), diffraction of matter waves comprised of atoms and molecules by crystals (1931) and the determination of the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and deuteron (1933). 1 Introduction Short lists of the pioneers of quantum mechanics featured in textbooks and historical accounts alike typically include the names of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Arnold Sommerfeld, Niels Bohr, Max von Laue, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Paul Dirac, Max Born, and Wolfgang Pauli on the theory side, and of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, Ernest Rutherford, Arthur Compton, and James Franck on the experimental side. However, the records in the Archive of the Nobel Foundation as well as scientific correspondence, oral-history accounts and scientometric evidence suggest that at least one more name should be added to the list: that of the “experimenting theorist” Otto Stern.
    [Show full text]