DOCSLIB.ORG

Barriers to Saving: the Dilemma for Low-Income Families

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Barriers to Saving: the Dilemma for Low-Income Families Illustrations by Kirk Lyttle In Barriers households dopar whenlow-income IRAs. Moreover, plans, andfew ofthemcontributeto savings retirement households toparticipate inemployer-based muchlesslikelythanhigher-income householdsare holds. Such households. of theirincomethanhigher-income contribute asmaller share ing interest in raising retirement saving by low-income house- low-income saving by inraisingretirement ing interest grow- policymakersofbothparties expressed years, have recent ticipate in retirement savingplans,theytendto ticipate inretirement to Saving and Peter Orszag Orszag and Peter ZoëNeuberger,by Robert Greenstein, Communities & Banking 25 A growing body of evidence sug- are insufficient to make ends meet. In were developed in the early 1970s, gests that low-income families will save addition, many low-income people employers have shifted away from more if saving is made easier for them who are unable to work for a while defined-benefit plans, putting more and if they are given a clear financial because of a serious disability rely tem- workers—those without a defined-ben- incentive to do so. For example, 401(k) porarily on Supplemental Security efit plan—at a distinct disadvantage. participation rates among new employ- Income (SSI). A different inconsistency exists in ees rise substantially when such In many of these programs, the the Food Stamp Program, which gener- employees are enrolled in the plans asset limit is set at or about $2,000. ally does not count employer-based automatically unless they opt out. Moreover, the asset limits in these pro- retirement plans toward the asset test Congress is likely soon to adopt legisla- grams generally are not indexed to but does count IRAs. This, too, is tion making it more attractive for inflation and are raised infrequently. As inequitable, since many low- and mod- employers to establish automatic a result, the asset limits have shrunk erate-income people work for compa- nies that do not offer an employer- based retirement plan. Furthermore, Counting retirement savings toward the many workers are encouraged to roll asset test of programs like Medicaid or their funds over from a 401(k) into an IRA when switching jobs, which could SSI could force a family or individual disqualify them from receiving food stamps. to deplete those savings before Counting retirement savings qualifying for benefits. toward a program’s asset test could force a family or individual to deplete those savings before qualifying for ben- enrollment for 401(k)s. Congress also substantially in inflation-adjusted efits, even when doing so would may at some point extend the benefits terms and are expected to continue to involve a financial penalty. As a result, of the Saver’s Credit—a tax credit for do so in the future. asset tests often penalize low-income low- and moderate-income individuals In addition to imposing what families that save for retirement and who save for retirement—to workers amounts to a steep implicit tax on sav- discourage others from saving in the who do not earn enough to owe ing, asset tests in means-tested benefit first place. income taxes. programs treat retirement saving in a Consider, for example, individuals Such changes are important, but confusing and seemingly arbitrary whose earnings were consistently low they will not be fully effective unless manner. One family may be able to throughout their career. (As defined by policymakers also address the barriers retain its retirement savings when it the Social Security Administration, or to saving posed by the asset tests of needs to turn to means-tested benefits, SSA, a low earner is someone whose many means-tested benefit programs, while a similar family that uses a differ- average earnings are about 45 percent such as food stamps and Medicaid. To ent retirement saving vehicle or lives in of the average worker’s wages, or about qualify for these programs, applicants a different state may have to deplete its $16,000 in 2004.) To avoid living in often must have total countable assets retirement savings or forgo means-test- poverty during retirement, such work- that do not exceed a dollar limit set by ed benefits during a time of need. Also, ers would need about $2,000 in the program. These asset tests can a household may qualify for some pro- income from savings for each year of penalize those who save for retirement. grams but not others solely because of retirement to supplement their Social Fortunately, there are steps the federal the different rules across programs for Security benefits, or around $30,000 in government and state governments can counting retirement accounts. savings at retirement (if they have aver- take to reduce the savings barriers such Adding to the confusion, some age life expectancy). Clearly, subjecting asset tests can create.1 employer-based retirement plans are households to a $2,000 asset limit can exempt from the asset limits in these prevent them from saving enough to Existing Asset Rules Punish programs, while others are not. Means- support themselves for even a brief Savers tested programs generally do not count period, much less their entire retire- Many low-income families rely on employer-based retirement plans if they ment. means-tested programs such as food are structured as “defined-benefit stamps, Medicaid, or cash assistance at plans” such as traditional pensions, but Eliminating Barriers times during their working years—for often do count them if they are struc- The most straightforward and example, during temporary spells of tured as “defined-contribution plans” comprehensive way to eliminate the unemployment or when their earnings such as 401(k)s. Since these asset rules retirement savings barrier posed by 26 Summer 2006 these asset rules would be for Congress older). Most employer-based Conclusion to amend the tax code so retirement retirement plans, including Modifying asset rules that discour- accounts that receive preferential tax defined-benefit plans and 401(k)s, age low-income families from building treatment—such as 401(k) plans and are excluded from the asset limit, retirement savings would help reduce IRAs—do not count toward eligibility but IRAs are counted. The 2002 elderly poverty and increase the nation- and benefit determinations in federal Farm Bill gave states a new option al saving rate. There would be some means-tested programs. to exclude certain types of assets budgetary cost because these changes Short of that, the federal govern- from their food stamp asset test if would make some low-income house- ment and states can take steps to sub- they exclude these assets from holds newly eligible for benefits. Yet the stantially reduce savings barriers. At the their asset test for Temporary return should more than justify the federal level, the Social Security Assistance for Needy Families investment. The changes would simpli- Administration could take two steps to (TANF) cash assistance or family fy program administration and reduce facilitate retirement saving by low- Medicaid coverage. This provision administrative costs. Most important, if income people with disabilities who appears to apply to IRAs, accord- low-income households could save need SSI benefits: ing to the U.S. Department of more for retirement, the economy as a • SSA or Congress could exclude Agriculture’s proposed regulations. whole would most likely benefit, and from the SSI asset test retirement If the final regulations confirm fewer people would have to rely on accounts held by non-elderly indi- that the provision applies to IRAs, public benefits in old age. viduals. That would eliminate the states could exclude IRAs from the need for working-age individuals food stamp asset test if they also with serious disabilities to liqui- exclude IRAs in their TANF cash date their retirement accounts dur- assistance or family Medicaid pro- Zoë Neuberger is a senior policy ana- ing periods when they are unable gram. lyst at the Center on Budget and Policy to work and need SSI benefits to • Temporary Assistance for Needy Priorities, where Robert Greenstein is make ends meet. Families. States have complete dis- executive director. Peter Orszag is the • SSA or Congress could eliminate cretion over their TANF asset lim- Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow in the requirement that elderly indi- its and the types of assets that Economic Studies at the Brookings viduals convert their retirement count toward them. Therefore, Institution and Director of the accounts into a lifetime annuity in states have the flexibility to Retirement Security Project. order to have these funds excluded exclude retirement accounts from from the SSI asset test. A lifetime the asset test for TANF-funded annuity is not always a wise choice programs. 1See Zoë Neuberger, Robert Greenstein, and for low-income people. Instead, in • Medicaid and the State Children’s Eileen Sweeney, Protecting Low-Income Families’ Savings: How Retirement Accounts Are Treated in determining individuals’ SSI eligi- Health Insurance Program Means-Tested Programs and Steps to Remove bility and benefit levels, SSA could (SCHIP). Nearly all states, includ- Barriers to Retirement Saving (The Retirement exclude their retirement accounts ing all New England states, have Security Project, report no. 2005-6, June 2005), as assets, while counting as income eliminated the Medicaid asset test http://www.cbpp.org/6-21-05socsec.pdf. Sources for the information cited here are included in the the monthly amount that could be for children, but the majority of report. taken from their account for the states continue to apply an asset remainder of their life, based on test when evaluating Medicaid eli- the account’s value and the indi- gibility for parents, and most of vidual’s projected life expectancy. these states count 401(k)s and IRAs toward the asset limit. States could In addition, states have the flexi- dispense with their Medicaid asset bility to craft a more coherent set of tests for both children and parents, asset rules in means-tested programs, or if they wish to retain an asset test thereby exempting more retirement for either group, they could exclude savings from asset tests and making retirement accounts from the asset these programs easier to administer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Budgetary Effects of the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 February 2021
    The Budgetary Effects of the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 FEBRUARY 2021 If enacted at the end of March 2021, the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 (S. 53, as introduced on January 26, 2021) would raise the federal minimum wage, in annual increments, to $15 per hour by June 2025 and then adjust it to increase at the same rate as median hourly wages. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill’s effects on the federal budget. The cumulative budget deficit over the 2021–2031 period would increase by $54 billion. Increases in annual deficits would be smaller before 2025, as the minimum-wage increases were being phased in, than in later years. Higher prices for goods and services—stemming from the higher wages of workers paid at or near the minimum wage, such as those providing long-term health care—would contribute to increases in federal spending. Changes in employment and in the distribution of income would increase spending for some programs (such as unemployment compensation), reduce spending for others (such as nutrition programs), and boost federal revenues (on net). Those estimates are consistent with CBO’s conventional approach to estimating the costs of legislation. In particular, they incorporate the assumption that nominal gross domestic product (GDP) would be unchanged. As a result, total income is roughly unchanged. Also, the deficit estimate presented above does not include increases in net outlays for interest on federal debt (as projected under current law) that would stem from the estimated effects of higher interest rates and changes in inflation under the bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects Journal 3(11), 2019
    Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects Journal 3(11), 2019 Contents lists available at ScienceCite Index Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects Journal journal homepage: http://scopuseu.com/scopus/index.php/ssap/index What are the differences between the study of Micro Economics and Macro Economics and how are they inter­related with regard to the drafting of economic policies to remain current and relevant to the global economic environment Azizjon Akromov 1, Mushtariybegim Azlarova 2, Bobur Mamataliev 2, Azimkhon Koriev 2 1 Student MDIST 2 Students Tashkent State University Economic ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: As economics is mostly known for being a social science, studying production, Received consumption, distribution of goods and services, its primary goal is to care about Accepted well­being of its society, which includes firms, people, and so forth. The study of Available online economics mainly consists of its two crucial components, which are Keywords: microeconomics and macroeconomics. Together these main parts of economics are concerned with both private and public sector issues including, inflation, economic Macroeconomics, growth, choices, demand and supply, production, income, unemployment and many microeconomics, other aspects. It is already mentioned that well­being of society would be indicators, production, established when government, while making economics policies, assume all factors consumers, companies, including those people who are employed or unemployed, so that no one gets hurt economics, government or suffer in the end. When it comes to making economic decisions and policies, governments should take into consideration that decisions made on a macro level has huge impact on micro and the same with micro, firms, households, individuals’ behaviors and choices come as aggregate in total, then turns into macro level, which triggers the introduction of some policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroeconomics Course Outline and Syllabus
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Open Educational Resources New York City College of Technology 2018 Macroeconomics Course Outline and Syllabus Sean P. MacDonald CUNY New York City College of Technology How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ny_oers/8 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] COURSE OUTLINE FOR ECON 1101 – MACROECONOMICS New York City College of Technology Social Science Department COURSE CODE: 1101 TITLE: Macroeconomics Class Hours: 3, Credits: 3 COURSE DESCRIPTION: Fundamental economic ideas and the operation of the economy on a national scale. Production, distribution and consumption of goods and services, the exchange process, the role of government, the national income and its distribution, GDP, consumption function, savings function, investment spending, the multiplier principle and the influence of government spending on income and output. Analysis of monetary policy, including the banking system and the Federal Reserve System. COURSE PREREQUISITE: CUNY proficiency in reading and writing RECOMMENDED TEXTBOOK and MATERIALS* Krugman and Wells, Eds., Macroeconomics 3rd. ed, Worth Publishers, 2012 Leeds, Michael A., von Allmen, Peter and Schiming, Richard C., Macroeconomics, Pearson Education, Inc., 2006 Supplemental Reading (optional, but informative): Krugman, Paul, End This Depression
    [Show full text]
  • Saving out of Different Types of Income
    LESTER D. TAYLOR* Universityof Michigan Saving out of Diferent Types of Income IT HAS ALWAYSBEEN A SOURCEof professionalpride to me to be able to tell my undergraduatestudents in macro theory that economists know a lot about what makes consumers tick. However, in light of the experience of the past several years, I now state this proposition much more circumspectly, and perhaps should restrain myself altogether. For the fact is that in the last three or four years, the consumer has done few things predicted of him. To be sure, there have been some new elements in the picture: interest rates at the highest levels in a century; a "roaring" inflation, at least by contem- porary U.S. standards; and a temporary tax increase. But even so, the con- sumer seems to have injected his own element of eccentricity. Among other things, he was thrifty in 1967 and the first half of 1968 on a scale then un- precedented for the postwar period. And while he regained his taste for spending in the last half of 1968, it was rather short-lived. For in the third quarter of 1969, the personal saving rate again began to rise, and from the third quarter of 1970 through the second quarter of 1971, was in excess of the unheard-of level of 8 percent. * Computationsand researchassistance supported by the National Science Founda- tion. I am gratefulto membersof the Brookingspanel for commentsand criticisms,to Daniel Weiserbsand Angelo Mascarofor researchassistance, and to Joan Hinterbichler and PatriciaRamsey for secretarialassistance. I have also greatlybenefited from access to an unpublishedpaper of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Microeconomic Foundation of Macroeconomics This Handout Is
    Handout A: Microeconomic Foundation of Macroeconomics This handout is concerned with microeconomics foundation for macroeconomics. In particular we focus on the Theory of Consumer Choice, or consumer theory for short. The goal is to understand how a consumer makes choices with a given preference and budget constraint. Budget Constraint Consider two goods: Apple (A) and Banana (B). Denote their quantities by and ; prices by and The budget constraint is where denotes the income. Equation (1) can be rewritten as ( ) ( ) We can draw the budget line using (2). We put on the vertical axis, and on horizontal axis. The intercept of the budget line is____________________ The slope of the budget line is ____________________ The maximum amount of is 1 The maximum amount of is The budget line looks like Exercise 1: After falls, the intercept (rises falls) and the absolute value of slope (rises falls). So the budget line shifts (inward outward) Exercise 2: What happens to the maximum amount of after falls? Exercise 3: What happens to the budget line when Y rises? Preference The preference of the consumer is captured by his utility function . Denote the marginal utility (MU) by 2 measures the change in utility when changes by a small amount. We assume utility rises when either more apples or more bananas are consumed, i.e., Moreover we assume decreasing marginal utility (DMU) DMU says that as more and more apples (bananas) are consumed, the additional utility brought by the last apple (banana) becomes less and less. In other words as more goods are consumed total utility rises but at decreasing rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 12: the Balance of Payments Introduction We Now Begin Working Toward Understanding How Economies Are Linked Together at the Macroeconomic Level
    Topic 12: the balance of payments Introduction We now begin working toward understanding how economies are linked together at the macroeconomic level. The first task is to understand the international accounting concepts that will be essential to understanding macroeconomic aggregate data. The kinds of questions to pose: ◦ How are national expenditure and income related to international trade and financial flows? ◦ What is the current account? Why is it different from the trade deficit or surplus? Which one should we care more about? Does a trade deficit really mean something negative for welfare? ◦ What are the primary factors determining the current-account balance? ◦ How are an economy’s choices regarding savings, investment, and government expenditure related to international deficits or surpluses? ◦ What is the “balance of payments”? ◦ And how does all of this relate to changes in an economy’s net international wealth? Motivation When was the last time the United States had a surplus on the balance of trade in goods? The following chart suggests that something (or somethings) happened in the late 1990s and early 2000s to make imports grow faster than exports (except in recessions). Candidates? Trade-based stories: ◦ Big increase in offshoring of production. ◦ China entered WTO. ◦ Increases in foreign unfair trade practices? Macro/savings-based stories: ◦ US consumption rose fast (and savings fell) relative to GDP. ◦ US began running larger government budget deficits. ◦ Massive net foreign purchases of US assets (net capital inflows). ◦ Maybe it’s cyclical (note how US deficit falls during recessions – why?). US trade balance in goods, 1960-2016 ($ bllions). Note: 2017 = -$796 b and 2018 projected = -$877 b Closed-economy macro basics Before thinking about how a country fits into the world, recall the basic concepts in a country that does not trade goods or assets (so again it is in “autarky” but we call it a closed economy).
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV, Income, Spending, and Saving Patterns of Consumer Units In
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 15 Volume Author/Editor: Conference on Research in Income and Wealth Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-870-14170-8 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/unkn52-1 Publication Date: 1952 Chapter Title: Income, Spending, and Saving Patterns of Consumer Units in Different Age Groups Chapter Author: Janet A. Fisher Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9766 Chapter pages in book: (p. 75 - 102) Part IV Income, Spending, and Saving Patterns of Consumer Units in Different Age Groups JANET A. FISHER Madison, Wisconsin This paper is a condensation of the author's 'The Economics of an Aging Population, A Study of the Income, Spending and Saving Patterns of Con­ sumer Units in Different Age Groups, 1935-36, 1945 and 1946' (unpub­ lished). The data used there were taken from the Consumer Purchases Study for 1935-36, the 1946 Liquid Assets Survey. and the 1947 Survey of Consumer Finances. For data from the Consumer Purchases Study for 1935-36, see Day Monroe, Maryland Y. Pennell, Mary Ruth Pratt, and Geraldine S. DePuy, Family Spending and Saving as Related to Age of Wife and Age and Number of Children (Department of Agriculture, Misc. Pub. 489,1942). Data from the 1946 Liquid Assets Survey and the 1947, 1948, and 1949 Surveys of Consumer Finances were made available by the Survey Research Center of the University ofMichigan which conducted these surveys for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    [Show full text]
  • Income, Institutions, and Saving Performance in Individual Development Accounts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Working Papers Income, Institutions, and Saving Performance in Individual Development Accounts Michael Sherraden, Mark Schreiner and Sondra Beverly Working Paper 02-3 January 2002 Center for Social Development Income, Institutions, and Saving Performance in Individual Development Accounts Michael Sherraden Washington University in St. Louis Mark Schreiner Washington University in St. Louis and Microfinance Risk Management Sondra Beverly University of Kansas Working Paper No. 02-3 January 2002 Center for Social Development Washington University in St. Louis One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196 St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, U.S.A. Tel: (314) 935-7433 Fax: (314) 935-8661 E-mail: [email protected] http://gwbweb.wustl.edu/csd/ A subsequent version of this paper has been published as: Sherraden, M., Schreiner, M., & Beverly, S. Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 1, 95-112 February 2003. Acknowledgements: The authors appreciate the suggestions and editorial assistance of Timothy Bates and Constance Dunham, and the contributions of colleagues Margaret Clancy, Lissa Johnson, Jami Curley, Michal Grinstein-Weiss, and Min Zhan. Suzanne Fragale and Jenny Kraus provided technical support. This research is made possible by funding from the Ford Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Joyce Foundation, Citigroup Founcation, Fannie Mae Foundation, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Levi Strauss Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Moriah Fund, and Metropolitan Life Foundation. We are grateful to the Corporation for Enterprise Development for implementing ADD and the 14 ADD program sites for allowing us to carry out the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Why All Economists Should Be Feminist Economists
    Why all economists should be feminist economists Susan Himmelweit This chapter will present what I see as the key features of feminist economics, arguing that these all follow from its fundamental premise: that economics needs to take account of gender relations because the differences in men’s and women’s roles are integral to how any economy runs. Changes in the economy can affect gender relations and vice versa. Feminist economics is therefore not economics for women, but simply better economics and all economists should become feminist economists. Definitions Although feminist economists have been resistant to producing a list of its key principles and few writers explicitly define what they mean by feminist economics, three definitions are implicit in the type of critiques given of mainstream economics (Schneider & Shackelford, 1998). It can be implicitly defined by its politics, as economics that focuses on what is needed to create gender equality. It might seem improper to define a field of economics by the political change that it wants to promote. Surely, a mainstream economist might say, even if one is interested in promoting a more equal society, does one not have the duty to be as objective as possible when studying economics? Those who use such a political definition of feminist economics would argue that mainstream economics is itself ideological, based on perpetuating gender inequality by normalising men’s lives and ignoring much of what women do (Strassman, 1997). Thus, “economic man”, the typical individual of mainstream economic models, engages in market transactions, supports himself by earning an income from employment and spending the money he earns on buying consumption goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Black Women and the Wage
    FACT SHEET Black Women and the Wage Gap MARCH 2021 Conversations around the wage gap tend to over-focus on the numbers while ignoring the causes. But these numbers are more than facts and figures; they represent the tangible consequences of sexism and white supremacy in the United States and how our country systematically devalues women of color and their labor. While racism and sexism are often thought of as individual bias, history shows us that systemic discrimination in pay and exploitation of workers based on race, class, gender and immigration status can be traced all the way back to this country’s horrific past of enslaving Africans and their descendants; colonial attempts to destroy Native communities; and immigration policies, from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1924, to the Bracero program of the 1940s-1960s, to the Trump administration’s Muslim bans and the humanitarian crisis on our Southern border. Today this means that Black women in the United States who work full time, year-round are typically paid just 63 cents for every dollar paid to white, non-Hispanic men.1 The wages of Black women are driven down by a number of current factors including gender and racial discrimination, workplace harassment, job segregation and a lack of workplace policies that support family caregiving, which is still most often performed by women.2 Overall, women employed full time, year-round are typically paid 82 cents for every dollar paid to men.3 Even in states with large populations of Black women in the workforce, rampant wage disparities persist, with potentially devastating consequences for Black women and families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Definitions of Income
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2018 The Definitions of Income John R. Brooks Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1952 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2928972 71 Tax L. Rev. 253 (2018) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Taxation-Federal Commons, and the Tax Law Commons The Definitions of Income JOHN R. BROOKS* I. INTRODUCTION What is income? Perhaps you know it when you see it, but defining income in a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent way is very diffi- cult, if not impossible. Economists, tax scholars, policymakers, and others have struggled with the income concept for well over a hundred years, with no solution in sight. Instead, we have many different defi- nitions of income for different purposes-income definitions for taxes, transfers, measurement of national production, measurement of household resources, measurement of individual wellbeing, health care subsidies, student financial aid grants and loans, and more.' Even within the Code, there are several different measures of income for different purposes. 2 Each concept serves a specific goal, but none is truly comprehensive, nor can any be. In this Article, I explore in depth the conceptual difficulties presented by the income concept. Because a truly complete and rigor- ous definition of income is impossible or unworkable, we must make decisions about what the practical simplifications will be.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PERL7945 01 SE 01V2.QXD 6/27/07 2:06 PM Page 1
    M01_PERL7945_01_SE_01V2.QXD 6/27/07 2:06 PM Page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction I’ve often wondered what goes into a hot dog. Now I know and I wish I didn’t. —William Zinsser f each of us could get all the food, clothing, and toys we want without working, no one would study economics. Unfortunately, most of the good things in life are scarce—we Ican’t all have as much as we want. Thus scarcity is the mother of economics. Microeconomics is the study of how individuals and firms make themselves as well off as possible in a world of scarcity, and the consequences of those individual decisions for markets and the entire economy. In studying microeconomics, we examine how indi- vidual consumers and firms make decisions and how the interaction of many individual decisions affects markets. Microeconomics is often called price theory to emphasize the important role that prices play in determining market outcomes. Microeconomics explains how the actions of all buyers and sellers determine prices and how prices influence the decisions and actions of individual buyers and sellers. 1. Microeconomics: The Allocation of Scarce Resources: Microeconomics is the study In this chapter, we of the allocation of scarce resources. discuss three main 2. Models: Economists use models to make testable predictions. topics: 3. Uses of Microeconomic Models: Individuals, governments, and firms use micro- economic models and predictions in decision making. 1.1 Microeconomics: The Allocation of Scarce Resources Individuals and firms allocate their limited resources to make themselves as well off as possible. Consumers pick the mix of goods and services that makes them as happy as possible given their limited wealth.
    [Show full text]