DOCSLIB.ORG

STATISTICS for MISSION Approved Circuit/District Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STATISTICS for MISSION Approved Circuit/District Structure Statistical information on Church/Circuit/District membership, attendance and associated data relates to the current Conference- STATISTICS FOR MISSION approved Circuit/District structure. More information can be found at www.methodist.org.uk Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 1 North Cumbria Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Brampton 88 90 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 30 Corby Hill 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Dalston 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Gilsland 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Longtown 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Methodists@Tithebarn 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Monkhill 8 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 Newtown 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Thursby 14 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 Thurstonfield 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Upperby 18 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 Wetheral 13 17 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 20 Wigton Road 115 116 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 65 Circuit Total 350 357 0 12 0 2 0 0 7 256 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns. Unsubmitted returns are indicated by a blank record. For Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs), 'Methodists' are those holding membership of the Methodist church forming the partnership; 'Total Members' are all those who hold membership in the partnership. Some Church names may appear incomplete due to formatting restrictions. * indicates an 'LEP' 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 3 Kirkoswald and Alston Moor Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Ainstable 12 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 Alston Moor 33 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Gamblesby 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Kirkoswald 29 26 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 Langwathby & Skirwith 48 40 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 26 Renwick 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Salkeld Dykes 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 Circuit Total 163 150 0 0 0 0 1 9 3 105 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns. Unsubmitted returns are indicated by a blank record. For Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs), 'Methodists' are those holding membership of the Methodist church forming the partnership; 'Total Members' are all those who hold membership in the partnership. Some Church names may appear incomplete due to formatting restrictions. * indicates an 'LEP' 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 4 Western Fells Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Bassenthwaite 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 Brigham 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Cleator Moor 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Cockermouth 84 82 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 45 Egremont 43 50 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 22 Gosforth 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Hensingham 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Keswick Southey Street 46 45 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 67 Kirkland * 2 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Seascale 32 26 0 0 0 1 0 5 2 10 St Bees 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 St John's Frizington 11 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 St Mark's Moresby Parks 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 13 Circuit Total 312 297 21 2 0 10 9 10 8 266 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns. Unsubmitted returns are indicated by a blank record. For Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs), 'Methodists' are those holding membership of the Methodist church forming the partnership; 'Total Members' are all those who hold membership in the partnership. Some Church names may appear incomplete due to formatting restrictions. * indicates an 'LEP' 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 5 Solway Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Dearham 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 Great Clifton 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Harrington 43 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 Maryport 36 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 22 Seaton 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 United Church in Working * 39 39 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Circuit Total 139 132 67 0 0 0 0 2 5 97 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns. Unsubmitted returns are indicated by a blank record. For Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs), 'Methodists' are those holding membership of the Methodist church forming the partnership; 'Total Members' are all those who hold membership in the partnership. Some Church names may appear incomplete due to formatting restrictions. * indicates an 'LEP' 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 7 Kirkby Stephen, Appleby and Tebay Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Appleby 46 50 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 50 Bolton 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Brough 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Brough Sowerby 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 Crosby Garrett * 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Crosby Ravensworth 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 Dufton With Knock 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Great Asby 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Kings Meaburn 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Kirkby Stephen 36 35 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 Nateby 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Newbiggin-on-Lune 32 33 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 30 Orton 15 13 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 19 Ravenstonedale 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Soulby 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 Tebay 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 Warcop 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Winton * 9 10 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 7 Kirkby Stephen, Appleby and Tebay Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Circuit Total 267 264 25 2 1 5 2 1 6 298 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns. Unsubmitted returns are indicated by a blank record. For Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs), 'Methodists' are those holding membership of the Methodist church forming the partnership; 'Total Members' are all those who hold membership in the partnership. Some Church names may appear incomplete due to formatting restrictions. * indicates an 'LEP' 06 May 2020 Circuit Membership & Attendance Statistics Summary October 2019 District: 9 Cumbria District Circuit: 8 Sedbergh Methodist LEP Estimated Average Membership Members Recorded Gains and Losses Attendance Total New Other Transfers Other Church Deaths Typical Sunday or 2018 2019 Members Gains In Out Losses Mid-Week Service Cautley 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Dentdale 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 Dentfoot 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Garsdale 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Garsdale Street 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Hawes Junction 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 Sedbergh 70 72 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 60 Circuit Total 103 104 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 163 DISTRICT TOTALS 169,351 169,377 29,217 2,378 1,596 3,588 3,688 5,016 5,574 133,007 NOTE: The figures shown are as submitted by churches and circuits locally during the annual statistical returns.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crosby Ravensworth, Cumbria
    CASE STUDY Crosby Ravensworth, Cumbria This community led housing Background project was based in Crosby The Crosby Ravensworth community led housing project Ravensworth, Cumbria. The started with a community plan which had 41 action points, development comprised of the second most important being affordable housing. 19 homes in total – 7 self- build plots, 2 homes for The Lyvennet Community Plan Group (made up of communities shared ownership and 10 from Crosby Ravensworth, Kings Meaburn, Maulds Meaburn homes for affordable rent. and Reagill) then set up the Lyvennet Community Trust with the aim of delivering affordable housing in the area. This community led housing project acted as a catalyst Eden District Council was a key partner and provided a loan for a number of community to the project. The local authority part-funded specialist asset developments in the support from Cumbria Rural Housing Trust and carried out a Eden Valley, including the housing needs survey which highlighted the need for up to 23 acquisition of the local pub, affordable dwellings. nursery provision and an A dedicated community land trust (Lyvennet Community Trust) anaerobic digester project. was set up as a company limited by guarantee and a registered This project was not just charity. The Lyvennet Community Trust secured Registered about satisfying the affordable Provider status with the Homes and Communities Agency. housing need in Crosby Ravensworth, it was also about A large derelict industrial site was chosen as a potential addressing broader issues of location and, on the strength of a strong business plan, a loan derelict sites which impact of £300,000 was secured from Charities Aid Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • In Fox's Footsteps: Planning 1652 Country Quaker Pilgrimages 2019
    in fox's footsteps: planning 1652 country quaker pilgrimages 2019 Why come “If you are new to Quakerism, there can be no on a better place to begin to explore what it may mean Quaker for us than the place in which it began. pilgrimage? Go to the beautiful Meeting Houses one finds dotted throughout the Westmorland and Cumbrian countryside and spend time in them, soaking in the atmosphere of peace and calm, and you will feel refreshed. Worship with Quakers there and you may begin to feel changed by the experience. What you will find is a place where people took the demands of faith seriously and were transformed by the experience. In letting themselves be changed, they helped make possible some of the great changes that happened to the world between the sixteenth and the eighteenth centuries.” Roy Stephenson, extracts from ‘1652 Country: a land steeped in our faith’, The Friend, 8 October 2010. 2 Swarthmoor Hall organises two 5 day pilgrimages every year Being part of in June/July and August/September which are open to an organised individuals, couples, or groups of Friends. ‘open’ The pilgrimages visit most of the early Quaker sites and allow pilgrimage individuals to become part of an organised pilgrimage and worshipping group as the journey unfolds. A minibus is used to travel to the different sites. Each group has an experienced Pilgrimage Leader. These pilgrimages are full board in ensuite accommodation. Hall Swarthmoor Many Meetings and smaller groups choose to arrange their Planning own pilgrimage with the support of the pilgrimage your own coordination provided by Swarthmoor Hall, on behalf of Britain Yearly Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Song in Cumbria: a Distinctive Regional
    FOLK SONG IN CUMBRIA: A DISTINCTIVE REGIONAL REPERTOIRE? A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Susan Margaret Allan, MA (Lancaster), BEd (London) University of Lancaster, November 2016 ABSTRACT One of the lacunae of traditional music scholarship in England has been the lack of systematic study of folk song and its performance in discrete geographical areas. This thesis endeavours to address this gap in knowledge for one region through a study of Cumbrian folk song and its performance over the past two hundred years. Although primarily a social history of popular culture, with some elements of ethnography and a little musicology, it is also a participant-observer study from the personal perspective of one who has performed and collected Cumbrian folk songs for some forty years. The principal task has been to research and present the folk songs known to have been published or performed in Cumbria since circa 1900, designated as the Cumbrian Folk Song Corpus: a body of 515 songs from 1010 different sources, including manuscripts, print, recordings and broadcasts. The thesis begins with the history of the best-known Cumbrian folk song, ‘D’Ye Ken John Peel’ from its date of composition around 1830 through to the late twentieth century. From this narrative the main themes of the thesis are drawn out: the problem of defining ‘folk song’, given its eclectic nature; the role of the various collectors, mediators and performers of folk songs over the years, including myself; the range of different contexts in which the songs have been performed, and by whom; the vexed questions of ‘authenticity’ and ‘invented tradition’, and the extent to which this repertoire is a distinctive regional one.
    [Show full text]
  • SWARTHMOOR Wwtw, ULVERSTON, Cumbria
    SWARTHMOOR WwTW, ULVERSTON, Cumbria Archaeological Watching Brief - Supplementary Report Oxford Archaeology North December 2009 United Utilities Issue No: 2009-10/1004 OA North Job No: L9355 NGR: SD 2788 7787 Swarthmoor WwTW, Ulverston, Cumbria: Archaeological Watching Brief - Supplementary Report 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Circumstances of the Project ........................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Project Design................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Watching Brief................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Archive........................................................................................................... 5 3. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Location, Topography and Geology ................................................................ 6 3.2 Historical and Archaeological Background.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fun Run Report
    Fun Run Report 14th March 2020 FunFun RunRun ReportReport “I bet Charlie runs between his lunch groups”, Ruth Evans quipped at one of our NISCU team days last autumn. Nick’s ears pricked up, his head turned like an owl and he chortled, “that’s not a bad idea for a fundraiser!” And thus, the Fun Run was born. As many of you will know the funding for the Furness area was secured in 2017 for a hear a bit more about the work of NISCU. Rev Stephen Tudway prayed for three-year period which is now coming to an end. Nick and I have been having frequent myself and the work before sending me on my way in the company of Andy discussions about how we can raise the profile of the work in the Furness area but also Connor. Andy and I made good progress through to Kirkby-In-Furness ensure the financial sustainability for the long term. Here in the Furness area we have had before being hampered by some slow muddy ground around Ireleth. Andy did a sterling several opportunities within our secondary schools which has been hugely encouraging in job on the navigation, despite running for a rival club which we joked about, and we made terms of serving our schools and introducing young people to Jesus. it to Dalton slightly behind schedule. Dalton was probably the toughest section for me. Our aim with the Fun Run was to raise the profile of the I knew we were behind and I was around 18 miles in, I sunk into a bit of a work by having events in different towns coinciding with the times that I was to run through.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiple Estate: a Framework for the Evolution of Settlement in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian Cumbria
    THE MULTIPLE ESTATE: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SETTLEMENT IN ANGLO-SAXON AND SCANDINAVIAN CUMBRIA Angus J. L. Winchester In general, it is not until the later thirteenth century that surv1vmg documents enable us to reconstruct in any detail the pattern of rural settlement in the valleys and plains of Cumbria. By that time we find a populous landscape, the valleys of the Lake District supporting communi­ ties similar in size to those which they contained in the sixteenth century, the countryside peppered with corn mills and fulling mills using the power of the fast-flowing becks to process the produce of field and fell. To gain any idea of settlement in the area at an earlier date from documentary sources, we are thrown back on the dry, bare bones of the structure of landholding provided by a scatter of contemporary documents, including for southern Cumbria a few bald lines in the Domesday survey. This paper aims to put some flesh on the evidence of these early sources by comparing the patterns of lordship which they reveal in different parts of Cumbria and by drawing parallels with other parts of the country .1 Central to the argument pursued below is the concept of the multiple estate, a compact grouping of townships which geographers, historians and archaeologists are coming to see as an ancient, relatively stable framework within which settlement in northern England evolved during the centuries before the Norman Conquest. The term 'multiple estate' has been coined by G. R. J. Jones to describe a grouping of settlements linked
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Site Selection Process for a Geological Disposal Facility - 'Call for Evidence' Analysis of Responses Log
    PROTECT - POLICY IN DEVELOPMENT MRWS: Review of the site selection process for a geological disposal facility - 'Call for Evidence' analysis of responses log Relevant work Ref. Organisation/individual Issues raised packages 1 University of Oxford Improvements to site selection process: Need to develop trust in safety of geological disposal WP1, WP4 and explain monitoring process. Science behind decisions should be subject to independent peer-review. Peer review should be assessible and previous disputes fully reported. 2 National Skills Academy for Nuclear Improvements to site selection process: From experience of MRWS process in Cumbria WP3, WP7 suggests clear, objective factsheets on geological disposal, widely distributed; series of engagement events; clarity on local community benefits; decision-making by formal vote of those in local communities. 3 Individual -[REDACTED], Other: Requests no more nuclear waste in Cumbria n/a 4 Communities Against Nuclear Expansion Other: Poses concerns about new nuclear build at Sizewell (C) until a solution is found for legacy WP1, WP2, wastes. Believes more consideration should be given to the short term and interim storage of WP4, WP6, all types of Radioactive waste. Believes Sizewell community residents should be compensated WP7, WP8 for the planned EDFE Dry Fuel Store (DFS) for Spent Fuel. Misunderstands why a DFS is being built at EDFE's Sizewell B's PWR station and doesnt appreciate the uniqueness of the circumstances that arose to its requirement. Thus is concerned that they would be needed at all new build sites and they would be 'sprung' on those communities. Improvements to the site selection process: geology should come first, then exclude national parks and AONB, suitable sites then engage in volunteerism.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Off Framework Homecare Providers
    Off Framework Homecare Providers. This is a list of current Off Framework Homecare providers who have successfully completed due diligence checks. Carlisle area. 1. All Seasons, Autumn House, 23 Portland Square, Carlisle CA1 1PE. 2. Artemis Domiciliary Care, Room 38, Carlisle Enterprise Centre, Carlisle CA2 5BB. 3. Bluebird Care Carlisle, Suite 41, Riverside House, Warwick Road, Carlisle CA1 2BS. 4. The Richmond Fellowship, Logic House, Allenbrooke Road, Rosehill Estate, Carlisle CA1 2UT. 5. Cumbria Deaf Association, Harraby Green Business Park, Carlisle CA1 2SS (for specialised/complex service). 6. Wright Care 2012 Ltd, 390 Warwick Road, Carlisle CA1 2RU. 7. 1 to 1 5 Star Care Ltd, 194 Whernside, Morton, Carlisle CA2 6SU. 8. Good Companions (Cumbria) Ltd, Sterling House, 3 Wavell Drive, Rosehill Industrial Estate, Carlisle CA1 2SA. **note that service is being provided via God Companions Care at Home Agency, Beverley House, 80-82 Beverley Rise, Carlisle CA1 3RY** Eden area. 1. Cumbria Quality Care, 11 West Lane, Penrith CA11 7DP. 2. Beacon Home Care Services Limited, Homeleigh, William Street, Penrith CA11 7UP. West Cumbria area. 1. 121 Care, Unit 1 Former Wyndham Street Surgery, Wyndham Street, Cleator Moor CA25 5AN. 2. Bellcare Domiciliary Care Services Ltd, Office 25 Moss Bay House, 40 Peart Road, Derwent Howe, Workington CA14 3YT. 3. Jemcare, Unit 7 Windermere Building, Peart Road, Derwent Howe Industrial Estate, Workington CA14 3YT. 4. Preferred Care Solutions Cumbria, 19 Church Street, Whitehaven CA28 7EB. 5. Ralle Health Ltd, Dualla, Waverbridge, Wigton CA7 0DT. 6. Richmond Fellowship, Unit 1a, Phoenix Court, The Square, Cleator Moor, Cumbria, CA25 5PT 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Gallery Geograph
    INDEX TO GALLERY GEOGRAPH IMAGES These images are taken from the Geograph website under the Creative Commons Licence. They have all been incorporated into the appropriate township entry in the Images of (this township) entry on the Right-hand side. [1343 images as at 1st March 2019] IMAGES FROM HISTORIC PUBLICATIONS From W G Collingwood, The Lake Counties 1932; paintings by A Reginald Smith, Titles 01 Windermere above Skelwith 03 The Langdales from Loughrigg 02 Grasmere Church Bridge Tarn 04 Snow-capped Wetherlam 05 Winter, near Skelwith Bridge 06 Showery Weather, Coniston 07 In the Duddon Valley 08 The Honister Pass 09 Buttermere 10 Crummock-water 11 Derwentwater 12 Borrowdale 13 Old Cottage, Stonethwaite 14 Thirlmere, 15 Ullswater, 16 Mardale (Evening), Engravings Thomas Pennant Alston Moor 1801 Appleby Castle Naworth castle Pendragon castle Margaret Countess of Kirkby Lonsdale bridge Lanercost Priory Cumberland Anne Clifford's Column Images from Hutchinson's History of Cumberland 1794 Vol 1 Title page Lanercost Priory Lanercost Priory Bewcastle Cross Walton House, Walton Naworth Castle Warwick Hall Wetheral Cells Wetheral Priory Wetheral Church Giant's Cave Brougham Giant's Cave Interior Brougham Hall Penrith Castle Blencow Hall, Greystoke Dacre Castle Millom Castle Vol 2 Carlisle Castle Whitehaven Whitehaven St Nicholas Whitehaven St James Whitehaven Castle Cockermouth Bridge Keswick Pocklington's Island Castlerigg Stone Circle Grange in Borrowdale Bowder Stone Bassenthwaite lake Roman Altars, Maryport Aqua-tints and engravings from
    [Show full text]
  • PRIVATE RESIDENTS. TOP ~35 Sweeten Mrs
    CIJMBERLAND. J PRIVATE RESIDENTS. TOP ~35 Sweeten Mrs. Croydon villas, Beacon Thompson Col. Ernest Augustus J.P. Thompson William, Stone house, street, Penrith Park end, Workington • :Broughton Moor, Maryport Swift W. 122 Harrington rd.Wrkngtn Thompson Rev. George, Rectory, Thompson William Robt. 23 Christian Swinburn Miss, Laurel bank, Penrith East Scaleby, Carlisle street, Maryport road, Keswick fhompson Rev. l'homas Dawson B.A. Thompson-Kelly Herbert Chas. Olive Swinburn S. 83 Currock rd. Carlisle The Rock, Rockcliffe, Carlisle mount, Etterby scaur, Carlisle Swinburne J sph. Thwaites,Field view, Thompson C. L., D.L., J.P. Farlam Thomson Alexander, 4 Eden mount, Pardshaw hall, Cockermouth hall, Brampton Junction, Carlisle Stanwix, Carlisle Sykes Rev.Wm. Crag house,Thwaites, Thompson Charles Edward, 29 Thorn- Thomson Fras. Baggrow brow,Brayton Broughton-in-Furness (Lanes) ton road, Stanwix, Carlisle Thomson J awes, Baggrow ho.Brayton Sykes Watson, Alston 'fhompson Edward Horace, 46 Eliza- Thomson John, 86 Warwick rd.Crlsle Syme James Edmund,Rosewell garth, beth street, Workington Thomson Mrs. 4 Grindall pl. St. Bees Bookwell, Egremont Thompson George Bell, The Beeches, Thomson Robt. M. 7 Strand rd.Crlsle Symington J. T.Fleming pi. Maryport Houghton, Carlisle Thorbnrn J sph. 17 Kirkby st.Maryprt; Symington William J.P., M.B., C.M. Thompson George Pears, Kirkley ho. Thornborrow Jn.1 Carleton vils.Penrth Leafield, Brampton, Carli!le Great Corby, Carlisle Thornborrow T.G.59Arthnr st.Penrith Taggart Miss, 6 Church rd.Harringtn Thompson Henry, Aspatria Thornburn Mrs. Low moor, Bothel, Taggart Robert Metcalfe, 17 Inker­ Thompson Hy. Inglewood, Gt. Salkeld Aspatria man terrace, Whitehaven 'l'hompson Henry,4 Victoria rd.Penrth Thornburn Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper the Big Society: News from the Frontline in Eden August
    AWICS Independence…..Integrity.….Value Adrian Waite (In dependent Consultancy Services) Limited Briefing Paper The Big Society: News from the Frontline in Eden August 2010 Introduction The government’s ‘Big Society’ project was launched by David Cameron in Liverpool on 19th July 2010. As part of this, four areas have been identified as Vanguard Communities where it is intended to ‘turn government completely on its head’. These areas are Eden, Liverpool, Sutton and Windsor & Maidenhead. David Cameron said: “My great passion is building the Big Society. Anyone who’s had even a passing interest in what I’ve been saying for years will know that. “The ‘Big Society’ is…something different and bold… It’s about saying if we want real change for the long-term, we need people to come together and work together – because we’re all in this together. “(We want) Neighbourhoods who are in charge of their own destiny, who feel if they club together and get involved they can shape the world around them. “If you’ve got an idea to make life better, if you want to improve your local area, don’t just think about it – tell us what you want to do and we will try and give you the tools to make this happen.” David Cameron outlined what are to be the three major strands of Big Society which include: “First, social action. The success of the Big Society will depend on the daily decisions of millions of people – on them giving their time, effort, even money, to causes around them. So government cannot remain neutral on that – it must foster and support a new culture of voluntarism, philanthropy, social action.
    [Show full text]