DOCSLIB.ORG

COSEPAC Liste Des Crustacés Groupes Apparentés En Péril Classés Par Ordre De Priorité

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COSEPAC Liste Des Crustacés Groupes Apparentés En Péril Classés Par Ordre De Priorité COSEPAC Liste des crustacés et des groupes apparentés en péril au Canada classés par ordre de priorité Avril 2012 Financement fourni par Environnement Canada OBJECTIF DU CONTRAT Dresser la liste des espèces de crustacés et des groupes apparentés potentiellement en péril au Canada par ordre de priorité. Cette liste d’espèces candidates prioritaires servira de base à la priorisation des crustacés et des groupes apparentés en vue des évaluations futures du COSEPAC. PARTIE 1 : LISTES ANNOTÉES Évaluation générale des crustacés et des groupes apparentés suivants : 1. Phoronida 2. Pentastomida 3. Symphyla – Symphyles 4. Pauropoda – Pauropodes 5. Chilopoda 6. Diplopoda 7. Crustacea – Ostracodes 8. Crustacea – Branchiopodes 9. Crustacea – Maxillopodes 10. Crustacea – Malacostracés PARTIE 2 : LISTE DES ESPÈCES CANDIDATES Liste de 10 des espèces de crustacés et de groupes apparentés figurant dans la partie 1 qui sont les plus susceptibles d’être en péril. L’évaluation des espèces a été effectuée à l’aide du formulaire de critères de une page actuellement utilisé par le COSEPAC pour évaluer les espèces sauvages candidates. PARTIE 3 : LISTE D’EXPERTS Liste des personnes-ressources expertes (avec adresse, courriel et téléphone) des crustacés et des groupes apparentés figurant dans la partie 1. PARTIE 4 : RÉFÉRENCES Liste de références sur les crustacés et les groupes apparentés faisant partie du produit livrable (1) ainsi que liste des sources d’information générales, notamment les personnes-ressources, les sites Web et les publications spécialisées. TABLE DES MATIÈRES PARTIE 1 : LISTES ANNOTÉES DES CRUSTACÉS ET DES GROUPES APPARENTÉS .................................................................................................................. 5 1. Phoronida .................................................................................................................. 5 2. Pentastomida ............................................................................................................ 9 3. Symphyla ................................................................................................................ 11 4. Pauropoda ............................................................................................................... 13 5. Chilopoda ................................................................................................................ 17 6. Diplopoda ................................................................................................................ 23 7. Ostracoda ................................................................................................................ 33 8. Branchiopoda .......................................................................................................... 48 9. Maxillopoda ............................................................................................................. 68 10. Malacostraca ......................................................................................................... 97 PARTIE 2 : LISTE DES ESPÈCES CANDIDATEs ....................................................... 119 Austrotyla borealis Shear .......................................................................................... 119 Branchinecta campestris Lynch ................................................................................ 120 Eubranchipus ornatus Holmes .................................................................................. 122 Leptodora kindtii Focke ............................................................................................. 123 Limnocythere liporeticulata Delorme ......................................................................... 125 Pollicipes polymerus Sowerby ................................................................................... 127 Stygobromus canadensis Holsinger .......................................................................... 129 Stygobromus quatsinensis Holsinger et Shaw .......................................................... 130 Tropocyclops extensus Kiefer ................................................................................... 132 Tubaphe levii Causey ................................................................................................ 133 Références ................................................................................................................ 135 PARTIE 3: LISTE D’EXPERTS ..................................................................................... 135 Pauropoda ................................................................................................................. 135 Symphyla .................................................................................................................. 135 Diplopoda .................................................................................................................. 136 Chilopoda .................................................................................................................. 136 Branchiopoda ............................................................................................................ 137 Ostracoda .................................................................................................................. 138 Maxillopoda ............................................................................................................... 138 Malacostraca ............................................................................................................. 140 PARTIE 4: RÉFÉRENCES SUR LES CRUSTACÉS ET LES TAXONS APPARENTÉS .............................................................................................................. 141 Phoronida .................................................................................................................. 141 Pentastomida ............................................................................................................ 142 Pauropoda ................................................................................................................. 142 Symphyla .................................................................................................................. 143 Diplopoda .................................................................................................................. 143 Chilopoda .................................................................................................................. 145 Branchiopoda ............................................................................................................ 146 Ostracoda .................................................................................................................. 149 Maxillopoda ............................................................................................................... 151 Malacostraca ............................................................................................................. 155 Personnes-ressources .............................................................................................. 160 Liste des tableaux Tableau 1. Répartition et situation des phoronidiens au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée, 7 = exotique, 8 = occasionnelle. ....................................................................................... 8 Tableau 2. Répartition et situation des pentastomides au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue; 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée; 7 = exotique; 8 = occasionnelle. ..................................................................................... 11 Tableau 3. Répartition et situation des symphyles au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée, 7 = exotique, 8 = occasionnelle. ..................................................................................... 12 Tableau 4. Répartition et situation des pauropodes au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée, 7 = exotique, 8 = occasionnelle. ..................................................................................... 15 Tableau 5. Répartition et situation des chilopodes au Canada, d’après Kevan (1983) et Mercurio (2010). 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée, 7 = exotique, 8 = occasionnelle, * = d’après des mentions inédites ou non confirmées, ? = situation à clarifier. Pour les espèces portant plusieurs noms, le nom accepté est celui figurant dans Kevan (1983) ou Mercurio (2010). ....................................................................... 20 Tableau 6. Répartition et situation des Diplopodes au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non évaluée, 7 = exotique, 8 = occasionnelle, † = espèce nuisible identifiée. ..................................... 28 Tableau 7. Répartition et situation des ostracodes au Canada. 0.1 = disparue de la région, 0.2 = disparue, 1 = en péril, 2 = possiblement en péril, 3 = sensible, 4 = en sécurité, 5 = indéterminée, 6 = non
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PHORONIDA from EUROPA
    PHORONIDA from EUROPA This publication should be cited as : Emig C. C., Roldán C. & J. M. Viéitez, 1999, 2006. The Phoronida from the European coasts. http://paleopolis.rediris.es/Phoronida/. The Phoronida from the European coasts Christian C. EMIG 1, Carmen ROLDÁN 2 y José M. VIÉITEZ 3 1 Centre d'Océanologie, CNRS UMR 6540, Rue de la Batterie-des-Lions, 13007 Marseille (France) 2 Depto. de Biología Animal I, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid (Spain) 3 Depto. de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares (Spain) From data of recent ecological surveys on the European biodiversity (in the EU and adjacent waters), mainly in the south of the Iberian Peninsula, the Chafarinas Islands and Canary Islands, the number of phoronid species occuring in the European waters increased to 9: Lophophorata Phoronida Species NE Atlantic Ocean ** Mediterranean Sea Phoronis ovalis + + Phoronis hippocrepia + + Phoronis australis + + Phoronis ijimai Phoronis muelleri + + Phoronis psammophila + + Phoronis pallida + + Phoronopsis albomaculata + + Phoronopsis harmeri + + Phoronopsis californica + + ** including adjacent seas; i.e. Channel, North, Baltic... Thus, the Iberian Peninsula and the surrounding islands represent a privileged area as regards the phoronids because from the 10 valid described phoronid species, only Phoronis ijimai has not been recorded (species presently restricted to the Pacific and NW Atlantic), while P. ovalis has been cited on the French Mediterranean coast near the Spanish border. PHORONIDA from EUROPA Recent references Emig C. C., García Carrascosa A. M., Roldán C. & J. M. Viétiez, 1999. The occurrence in the Chafarinas Islands (S.E. Alboran Sea, western Mediterranean) of four species of Phoronida (Lophophorata) and their distribution in the north-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelp Forest Monitoring Handbook — Volume 1: Sampling Protocol
    KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL Channel Islands National Park Gary E. Davis David J. Kushner Jennifer M. Mondragon Jeff E. Mondragon Derek Lerma Daniel V. Richards National Park Service Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001 November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 MONITORING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... Species Selection ...........................................................................................2 Site Selection .................................................................................................3 Sampling Technique Selection .......................................................................3 SAMPLING METHOD PROTOCOL......................................................................... General Information .......................................................................................8 1 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................9 5 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................11 Band Transects ...............................................................................................13 Random Point Contacts ..................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Phoronida (Phoronids)
    ■ Phoronida (Phoronids) Phylum Phoronida Number of families 1 Thumbnail description Sedentary, infaunal, benthic suspension-feeders with a vermiform (worm-like) body that bears a lophophore and is enclosed in a slender tube in which the animal moves freely and is anchored by an ampulla. Photo: A golden phoronid (Phoronopsis califor- nica) in Madeira (São Pedro, southeast coast, about 100 ft [30 m] depth) showing the helicoidal shape of the lophophore. (Photo by Peter Wirtz. Reproduced by permission.) Evolution and systematics its own coelom. A lophophore, defined as a tentacular extension The phylum Phoronida is known to have existed since the of the mesosome (and of its coelomic cavity, the mesocoelom) Devonian, but there is a poor fossil record of burrows and embraces the mouth but not the anus. The main functions of borings attributed to phoronids. Many scientists now regard the lophophore are feeding, respiration, and protection. The the Phoronida as a class within the phylum Lophophorata, site and shape of the lophophore are proportional to body size, along with the Brachiopoda and perhaps the Bryozoa. Phor- ranging from oval to horseshoe to helicoidal in relation to an onida consists of two genera, Phoronis and Phoronopsis, which increase in the number of tentacles. Phoronids have a U-shaped are characterized by the presence of an epidermal collar fold digestive tract. A nervous center is present between the mouth at the base of the lophophore. The group takes its name from and anus, as is a ring nerve at the base of the lophophore, and the genus name Phoronis, one of the numerous epithets of the the animal has one or two giant nerve fibers.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Neotropical Diversity of Phoronids with DNA Barcoding of Planktonic Larvae
    Received: 30 April 2018 | Revised: 25 January 2019 | Accepted: 17 February 2019 DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12242 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Documenting neotropical diversity of phoronids with DNA barcoding of planktonic larvae Rachel Collin1 | Dagoberto E. Venera‐Pontón1 | Amy C. Driskell2 | Kenneth S. Macdonald2 | Kit‐Yu Karen Chan3 | Michael J. Boyle4 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Panama Abstract 2Laboratories of Analytical Biology, National Phoronid larvae, actinotrochs, are beautiful and complicated organisms which have Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian attracted as much, if not more, attention than their adult forms. We collected acti‐ Institution, Washington, DC 3Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong notrochs from the waters of the Pacific and Caribbean coasts of Panama, and used University of Science and Technology, Clear DNA barcoding of mtCOI, as well as 16S and 18S sequences, to estimate the diversity Water Bay, Hong Kong of phoronids in the region. We discovered three operational taxonomic units (OTUs) 4Smithsonian Marine Station, Fort Pierce, Florida in the Bay of Panama on the Pacific coast and four OTUs in Bocas del Toro on the Caribbean coast. Not only did all OTUs differ from each other by >10% pairwise dis‐ Correspondence Rachel Collin, Smithsonian Tropical tance in COI, but they also differed from all phoronid sequences in GenBank, includ‐ Research, Institute, Unit 9100, Box 0948, ing the four species for which adults have been reported for the Pacific of Panama, DPO AA 34002, USA Email: [email protected] Phoronopsis harmeri, Phoronis psammophila, Phoronis muelleri, and Phoronis hippocre‐ pia. In each ocean region, one common OTU was more abundant and occurred more Present Address Kit‐Yu Karen Chan, Biology frequently than other OTUs in our samples.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST COAST SPECIES of the PHYLUM PHORONIDA The
    WEST COAST SPECIES OF THE PHYLUM PHORONIDA The following seven species of phoronid adults are known from southern and central California: Phoronis architecta Phoronopsis californica % Phoronis muelleri - 3G-5CV Phoronopsis harmeri Phoronis pallida ^Phoronis psammophila Phoronis vancouverensis With the exception of Phoronis muelleri the larvae of the above are also well known here. An additional nearly cosmopolitan species Phoronis ovalis occurs in Washington and two additional widely distributed species Phoronis australis and Phoronis hippocrepia are reported from our east coast. Two further "larval species" occur in southern California, a third such form is known from Hawaii, and there may be at least two additional unidentified larvae from east coast waters. There are no described adults to match with these larval forms, so additional adult forms await discovery and description. Two additional species names may be familiar to California workers: Phoronopsis viridis is now considered a synonym of Phoronopsis harmeri and Phoronis pacifica has never been identified since the inadequate type description The Genus Phoronis Members of this genus lack the epidermal fold known as the collar which is located at the base of the lophophore in members of the only other genus Phoronopsis. Although inconsequential and sometimes inconspicuous, the collar is the only morphological feature separating the genera. Adults of the genus Phoronis are usually smaller than those of Phoronopsis Phoronis ovalis: Not yet described from southern California, but probably here. Positive identification is easy since species is diminutive (usually less than 1 cm in length), with only about 24 tentacles which are arranged in a slightly indented circle. Burrows within calcareous substrates (limestone, mollusc shells, barnacles) in which it forms aggregations by asexual budding.
    [Show full text]
  • Description and Molecular Phylogeny of a New Species of Phoronis (Phoronida) from Japan, with a Redescription of Topotypes of P
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysDescription 398: 1–31 (2014) and molecular phylogeny of a new species of Phoronis (Phoronida) from Japan... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.398.5176 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Description and molecular phylogeny of a new species of Phoronis (Phoronida) from Japan, with a redescription of topotypes of P. ijimai Oka, 1897 Masato Hirose1,†, Ryuma Fukiage2,‡, Toru Katoh3,§, Hiroshi Kajihara3,| 1 Coastal Ecosystem Restoration, International Coastal Research Center, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Insti- tute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8564, Chiba, Japan 2 Laboratory of Dead Body Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan3 Department of Natural History Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Hokkaido, Japan † http://zoobank.org/C6C49C49-B4DF-46B9-97D7-79DE2C942214 ‡ http://zoobank.org/D8FCA45C-E600-41FE-B4ED-0DB3EE96482D § http://zoobank.org/F0A8DBFC-D063-455A-B06D-7B4205283F34 | http://zoobank.org/D43FC916-850B-4F35-A78C-C2116447C606 Corresponding author: Masato Hirose ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Penev | Received 20 March 2013 | Accepted 12 February 2014 | Published 4 April 2014 http://zoobank.org/CD2EA20A-65FB-4A75-A401-4569A4EAB630 Citation: Hirose M, Fukiage R, Katoh T, Kajihara H (2014) Description and molecular phylogeny of a new species of Phoronis (Phoronida) from Japan, with a redescription of topotypes of P. ijimai Oka, 1897. ZooKeys 398: 1–31. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.398.5176 Abstract We describe Phoronis emigi sp. n. as the eighth member of the genus based on specimens collected from a sandy bottom at 33.2 m depth in Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Phoronopsis Californica and Phoronis Australis at Granada Coast (Spain, Western Mediterranean)
    Cah. Biol. Mar. (1997) 38 : 273-276 Occurrence of Phoronopsis californica and Phoronis australis at Granada Coast (Spain, Western Mediterranean). Luis SÁNCHEZ TOCINO 1, Amelia OCAÑA 1 and José M. VIÉITEZ 2 1. - Depto.de Biología Animal y Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, 18071 Granada (Spain) 2. - Depto. de Biología Animal, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares (Spain) Fax: 34 1 8855080 - E-mail: josem.vieitez @ alcala.es Adresse postale: José M. Viéitez. Depto. de Biología Animal. Universidad de Alcalá. 28871 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid, Spain). Abstract: Phoronopsis californica was collected at the beach of Calabajío (Almuñécar, Granada) at 9 m depth in a Cymodocea nodosa meadow with a muddy sand sediment; this represents the first record of this species for the Mediterranean Sea. At others localities of the same Granada province, but at a greater depth, around 15 m, Phoronis australis has been found, into a tube-wall of Cerianthus membranaceus which is typical for this phoronid species. The new record from Granada coast, enlarges the distribution area of Phoronida in the Mediterranean Sea, particularly that of the genus Phoronopsis. Résumé : Phoronopsis californica a été récoltée, pour la première fois en Mer Méditerranée, près de la plage de Calabajío (Almuñécar, Province de Grenade) à une profondeur de 9 m dans un sable fin, légèrement vaseux d'une prairie à Cymodocea nodosa. Dans une autre localité de la même province, à une profondeur de 15 m, Phoronis australis a été rencontrée, dans la paroi de tubes de Cerianthus membranaceus, une situation caractéristique de cette espèce de phoronidien. Ces nouvelles signalisations des environs de Grenade élargissent la distribution géographique des phoronidiens, en particulier celle du genre Phoronopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Phoronida
    Adz). Ma? . Bid .. V0l . 19. 1982. pp . 1-89 . THE BIOLOGY OF PHORONIDA C . C . EMIG Station Marine d'Endoume (Laboratoire associe' au C.N.R.S.41), 13007 Marseille. France I . Introduction .......... .. .. .. .. 2 I1 . Systematics .......... .. .. .. .. .. 2 I11 . Reproduction and Embryonic Development .. .. .. .. .. 5 A . Sexual patterns and gonad morphology .. .. .. .. 5 B . Oogenesis .......... .. .. .. .. .. 8 C. 'Spermiogenesis ........ .. .. .. .. .. 8 D . Release of spermatozoa ...... .. .. .. .. .. 9 E . Fertilization ........ .. .. .. .. .. 13 F . Spawning .......... .. .. .. .. .. 14 G . Embryonic development ..... .. .. .. .. .. 14 H . Embryonic nutrition ...... .. .. .. .. .. 17 IV . Actinotroch Larvae ........ .. .. .. .. .. 17 A . General account ........ .. .. .. .. .. 17 B . Development of the actinotroch species .. .. .. .. .. 21 C . Larval settlement and metamorphosis . .. .. .. .. .. 31 D . Metamorphosis ........ .. .. .. .. .. 33 V . Ecology ............ .. .. .. .. .. 38 A . Tube ........... .. .. .. .. .. 38 B . Biotopes .......... .. .. .. .. .. 43 C. Ecological effects ........ .. .. .. .. .. 47 D . Predators of Phoronida ...... .. .. .. .. .. 49 E . Geographical distribution .... .. .. .. .. .. 50 VI . Fossil Phoronida ......... .. .. .. .. .. 50 VII. Feeding ............ .. .. .. .. .. 53 A . Lophophore and epistome .... .. .. .. .. .. 53 B . Mechanisms of feeding ...... .. .. .. .. .. 56 C. The alimentary canal ...... .. .. .. .. .. 57 D . Food particles ingested by Phoronida . .. .. .. .. .. 61 E . Uptake of
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Development, the Origin of the Coelom and the Phylogenetic
    45 Morphological and molecular affi nities of Phoronida and Brachiopoda Introduction The Phoronida Hatschek, 1888 comprise eleven species assigned to the genera Phoronis Wright, 1856 and Phoronopsis Gilchrist, 1907. They possess characteristic features such as a wormlike body that secretes a chitinous tube in which the animal lives, burrowed in the substrate. A ciliary anterior tentacle crown that is held into the water column to capture food and giant nerve fi bres running alongside the body that allow the animal a rapid retrac- tion of its entire body represent further characteristic features. Phoronids possess a biphasic life cycle, with the pelagic actinotroch larva that develops into a juvenile phoronid via a catastrophic metamorphosis. So far, the only systematic study on phoronids has been published by Emig (1985). How- ever, with only ten species and eleven characters examined, the taxon-sampling and the amount of characters analyzed in this study are very limited. This and the use of many a priori assumptions about the evolution of the characters cast doubts on the validity of the results. Thus, hitherto no comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of phoronid relationships exists. Since their fi rst discovery in 1878, the relationship of the Phoronida to other metazoan taxa could not be resolved. Most of the time, the phoronids are considered to represent a sister group of the brachiopods (Ax 1989). Their grouping in a taxon called “Tentaculata” (sensu Hatschek 1888) or “Lophophorata” (sensu Hyman 1959) together with the Bryozoa (Ectoprocta) and Brachiopoda was well accepted by subsequent textbook authors, and found support in systematic considerations on the phylogenetic position of the Phoronida by Emig (1977, 1984, 1997) and Zimmer (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Lophophorata: Phoronida)
    Santa Cruz de Tenerife, diciembre 2002 lSSN 0210-945X Nuevos registros de foronideos en Lanzarote, islas Canarias (Lophophorata: Phoronida) MARiA DEL CARMEN BRIT01, CHRJSTIAN C. EMld. JORGE NÛNEZ1, RODRIGO RŒRA1, CARMEN ROWAN3 & JOSÉ M. VIÉlTEZ4 1Departamento de Biologia Animal (Zoologia), Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Espa.ia 'CNRS UMR 6540, Celltre d'Océanologie, Chemin de la Batterie-des­ Lions, 13007 Marseille, Francia 3Departamento de Biologfa Animal l, Facultad de Biologfa, Universidad Complu/ense, 28040 Madrid, EspalÎa 4Departamemo de Biologfa Animal, Facultad de Biologia, Ulliversidad de A/cala, 2887J A/cala de Henares, Esplllia BRITO, M.C., C.C. EMIG. 1. NÛNEZ, R. RIERA, C. ROLOAN & J. M. VIÉITEZ (2002). New records of Phoronids (Lophophorara: Phoronida) in Lanzarote, Canary Islands. VIERAE... 30: 153-159. ABSTRACT: The species PllOronis psammophila Cori, 1889 and Phoronopsis hanneri Pixel!, 1912 are reported for the first time From Canary Islands. Samples were taken From sandy bottoms, From 15 to 49 m deep, in Lanzarote island. These records extend its distribution in the Atlantic-mediterranean region. The study species were formerly cited in nearby areas, such as, south ofSpain and thearchipelagoofAzores. Furthermore, additional autoecological characteristics and accompanying fauna data are presented. Key words: Pharonids, soft bottams, AtiantÎc-medîterranean region,Lanzarote, Canary Islands. RESUMEN: Se citan par primera vez para las islas Canarias Phoronis psammophila Cori, 1889 y Phoronopsis hanneri Pixel!, 1912, colectadas en la isla de Lanzarote en fondos arenosos entre 15-49 m de profundidad, Su presencia en estas costas amplfa su distribuci6n meridional en la regi6n Atlantico-mediterrânea, ya queambas especies han sida registradasen latitudes prôximas, como el sur de la peninsula Ibérica e islas Awres.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of the Epistome in Phoronopsis Harmeri (Phoronida) and Consideration of the Coelomic Organization in Phoronida
    Zoomorphology (2011) 130:121–134 DOI 10.1007/s00435-011-0126-z ORIGINAL PAPER Organization of the epistome in Phoronopsis harmeri (Phoronida) and consideration of the coelomic organization in Phoronida Elena N. Temereva • Vladimir V. Malakhov Received: 16 September 2010 / Revised: 28 April 2011 / Accepted: 30 April 2011 / Published online: 17 May 2011 Ó Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract Results provided by modern TEM methods Keywords Lophotrochozoa Á Phylogeny Á Phoronida Á indicate the existence of the lophophoral and trunk coelo- Coelom Á Ultrastructure mes but not of the preoral coelom in Phoronida. In the present work, the epistome in Phoronopsis harmeri was studied by histological and ultrastructural methods. Two Introduction kinds of cells were found in the frontal epidermis: sup- porting and glandular. The coelomic compartment is shown The Phoronida has since long been in focus of debates on to be inside the epistome. This compartment has a complex Metazoan evolution. The investigations of Masterman shape, consists of a central part and two lateral branches, (1898), who advanced the archicoelomate concept, stimu- and contacts the lophophoral coelom, forming two complete lated further study on the anatomy of the phoronid coelo- dissepiments on the lateral sides and a partition with many mic system. Several important works were dedicated to the holes in the center. TEM reveals that some portions of the organization and fate of the preoral coelom in the acti- incomplete partition are organized like a mesentery, with notroch larva (Menon 1902; Cowles 1904; Zimmer 1978, the two layers of cells separated by ECM. The myoepithe- 1980; Siewing 1974; Herrmann 1980, 1986) and in adult lial cells of the coelomic lining form the circular and radial phoronids (Pross 1974, 1978; Siewing 1974, 1980; Emig musculature of the epistome.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 Phoronida
    OUP-SECOND UNCORRECTED PROOF, October 22, 2015 28 PHORONIDA Elena Temereva INTRODUCTION organization (Silén 1952, Emig 1982, Temereva and Malakhov 2001). Most phoronids have a head region, anterior and poster- Phoronids are marine invertebrates with biphasic life cycles. he ior portions of the trunk, and the ampulla (Fig. 28.1A). Adult group includes eleven accepted species (Temereva and Neretina phoronids have an unusual body plan: the dorsal side between 2013, Hirose et al. 2014) belonging to two genera: Phoronis the mouth and anus is extremely short, whereas the ventral side Wright, 1856 and Phoronopsis Gilchrist, 1907. According to is long (Fig. 28.1F). As a result, the digestive tract is U-shaped comparative anatomy and embryology, phoronids and other and both branches can be observed in the cross-section of the lophophorates (Bryozoa and Brachiopoda) were regarded as body (Fig. 28.1G). All phoronids have a very complex circu- archimeric and very close to the Deuterostomia (Masterman latory system and red blood (Selys-Longchamps 1907, Emig 1898, Siewing 1980, Nielsen 2002). Phoronids, however, have 1977, Temereva and Malakhov 2004a, b) (Fig. 28.1A). been recently regarded as trochozoans (Giribet et al. 2009), Most phoronid species have planktotrophic larvae nested within the brachiopods (Cohen 2013). Because the tro- (Fig. 28.1E), only P. ovalis has lecithotrophic, creeping lar- chozoan ailiation of phoronids is not clearly supported by com- vae. In some species, embryos and young larvae develop in parative anatomy and embryology, their phylogenetic position the lophophoral cavity; advanced larval stages live and feed in among the Bilateria remains uncertain. plankton.
    [Show full text]