DOCSLIB.ORG

Utility Scale Wind Towers from China and Vietnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Utility Scale Wind Towers from China and Vietnam Utility Scale Wind Towers from China and Vietnam Investigation Nos. 701-TA-486 and 731-TA-1195-1196 (Final) Publication 4372 February 2013 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Irving A. Williamson, Chairman Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert David S. Johanson Meredith M. Broadbent Robert B. Koopman Director, Office of Operations Staff assigned Nathanael Comly, Investigator Andrew David, Industry Analyst Craig Thomsen, Economist David Boyland, Accountant Michael Haldenstein, Attorney Mara Alexander, Statistician Douglas Corkran, Supervisory Investigator Special assistance from David Goldfine, Attorney Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Utility Scale Wind Towers from China and Vietnam Investigation Nos. 701-TA-486 and 731-TA-1195-1196 (Final) Publication 4372 February 2013 CONTENTS Determinations .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Views of the Commission ............................................................................................................................. 3 Views of Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert ................................................................................................... 31 Dissenting views of Commissioners Daniel R. Pearson, David S. Johanson, and Meredith M. Broadbent .......................................................................................................................... 37 Part I: Introduction ............................................................................................................................. I-1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ I-1 Statutory criteria and organization of the report .................................................................................... I-1 Statutory criteria ................................................................................................................................. I-1 Organization of report ........................................................................................................................ I-2 Market summary ................................................................................................................................ I-3 Summary data and data souces .............................................................................................................. I-3 Previous and related investigations ........................................................................................................ I-3 Nature and extent of subsidies and sales at LTFV ................................................................................. I-4 Subsidies ............................................................................................................................................ I-4 Sales at LTFV .................................................................................................................................... I-5 The subject merchandise ....................................................................................................................... I-6 Commerce’s scope ............................................................................................................................. I-6 Tariff treatment .................................................................................................................................. I-7 The product ........................................................................................................................................... I-7 Description and applications .............................................................................................................. I-7 Manufacturing processes ................................................................................................................. I-12 Domestic like product issues ............................................................................................................... I-17 Physical characteristics and uses ...................................................................................................... I-17 Manufacturing facilities and production employees ........................................................................ I-17 Interchangeability ............................................................................................................................ I-18 Customer and producer perceptions ................................................................................................. I-18 Channels of distribution ................................................................................................................... I-18 Price ................................................................................................................................................. I-18 Part II: Supply and demand information ........................................................................................... II-1 U.S. market characteristics ................................................................................................................... II-1 Channels of distribution ....................................................................................................................... II-1 Geographic distribution ........................................................................................................................ II-1 Supply and demand considerations ...................................................................................................... II-2 U.S. supply ........................................................................................................................................ II-2 Foreign supply .................................................................................................................................. II-3 U.S. demand ...................................................................................................................................... II-5 Substitutability issues ......................................................................................................................... II-12 Purchaser characteristics ................................................................................................................. II-12 Knowledge of country sources and suppliers ................................................................................. II-13 Long-term supply agreements ......................................................................................................... II-14 Factors affecting purchasing decisions ........................................................................................... II-14 Lead times ....................................................................................................................................... II-19 Comparisons of domestic products, subject imports, and nonsubject imports ............................... II-19 Elasticity estimates .............................................................................................................................. II-21 U.S. supply elasticity ...................................................................................................................... II-22 U.S. demand elasticity .................................................................................................................... II-22 Substitution elasticity ...................................................................................................................... II-22 i CONTENTS Part III: U.S. producers’ production, shipments, and employment ................................................ III-1 U.S. producers ...................................................................................................................................... III-5 U.S. production, capacity, and capacity utilization .............................................................................. III-6 Aggregate wind tower operations .................................................................................................... III-6 Supply agreements ........................................................................................................................... III-7 Facility level wind tower operations ................................................................................................ III-8 Monthly wind tower operations ..................................................................................................... III-10 2012/13 wind tower operations ...................................................................................................... III-10 U.S. producers’ shipments ................................................................................................................. III-11 U.S. producers’ inventories ................................................................................................................ III-12 U.S. producers’ imports and purchases .............................................................................................. III-12 U.S. employment, wages, and productivity ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Willow Creek Wind Project June 2008
    United States Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Willow Creek Wind Project June 2008 INTRODUCTION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms for interconnection of up to 72 megawatts (MW) of power to be generated by the proposed Willow Creek Wind Project (Wind Project) into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Willow Creek Energy LLC (WCE) proposes to construct and operate the proposed Wind Project in Gilliam and Morrow counties, Oregon, and has requested interconnection to the FCRTS at a point along BPA’s existing Tower Road-Alkali 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Gilliam County, Oregon. BPA will construct a tap to allow the Wind Project to interconnect to BPA’s transmission line, and will install new equipment at BPA’s existing Boardman Substation in Morrow County, Oregon to accommodate this additional power in the FCRTS. BPA’s decision to offer terms to interconnect the Wind Project is consistent with BPA’s Business Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS) (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995), and the Business Plan Record of Decision (BP ROD, August 15, 1995). This decision thus is tiered to the BP ROD. BACKGROUND BPA is a federal agency that owns and operates the majority of the high-voltage electric transmission system in the Pacific Northwest. This system is known as the FCRTS. BPA has adopted an Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff) for the FCRTS, consistent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) pro forma open access tariff.1 Under BPA’s Tariff, BPA offers transmission interconnection to the FCRTS to all eligible customers on a first-come, first-served basis, with this offer subject to an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe
    Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe August 2020 Michael C. Allen, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, Matthew Campo, Senior Research Specialist, Environmental Analysis & Communications Group, Rutgers University Prepared for the New Jersey Climate Change Alliance (https://njadapt.rutgers.edu/). Working Group Members: John Cecil, New Jersey Audubon Tim Dillingham, American Littoral Society Patty Doerr, The Nature Conservancy of New Jersey Russell Furnari, PSEG Kevin Hassell, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Anthony MacDonald, Urban Coast Institute at Monmouth University Martha Maxwell-Doyle, Barnegat Bay Partnership David Mizrahi, Ph.D., New Jersey Audubon Technical Reviews and Acknowledgments Joseph Brodie, Ph.D. Jeanne Herb Marjorie Kaplan, Dr.P.H. Josh Kohut, Ph.D. Richard Lathrop, Ph.D. Julie Lockwood, Ph.D. Douglas Zemeckis, Ph.D. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-wn1p-cz80 1 ABSTRACT Offshore wind energy is poised to expand dramatically along the eastern United States. However, the promise of sustainable energy also brings potential impacts on marine ecosystems from new turbines and transmission infrastructure. This whitepaper informs government officials, scientists, and stakeholders in New Jersey about the current policies and monitoring methods other jurisdictions use to monitor potential ecological impacts from offshore wind installations. We reviewed policy documents in the eastern U.S. and Europe, reviewed the scientific literature, and conducted stakeholder interviews in Spring 2020. We found: 1. Short-term (3-5 year) project-specific efforts dominate coordinated regional and project life duration ecological monitoring efforts at offshore wind farms in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Daily 01.Pdf
    Not Very Green, Not Many Jobs An Assessment of the Obama Administration’s Green Jobs Agenda Executive Summary President Obama took office amid a weak economy and high unemployment. In spite of profound and urgent economic challenges, he remained committed to advancing an expansive environmental agenda. He promised to address global warming and other environmental concerns in a manner that would also create jobs and strengthen the American economy. Thus began the Administration’s so-called green jobs agenda, modeled after similar efforts underway in several European nations. The President’s green jobs experiment received substantial funding with the February 2009 passage of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Recovery Act or “stimulus”). Evaluating the President’s so-called green jobs effort is not a criticism of clean energy technologies, which play an important role in powering the future, but rather is an indictment of the Obama Administration’s management, execution, and record of its numerous programs that were falsely sold to the American people for their job potential when the jobs were never going to materialize. For 40 consecutive months and counting, the United States has endured a national unemployment rate higher than 8 percent, and speculation about the role of stimulus-funded programs continues unabated. Very few green jobs have been created. The green jobs agenda is an unfolding failure and the environmental merits of green jobs have also been called into question. The key components of the Administration’s green jobs agenda – increased spending, higher energy costs, and more environmental regulation – are precisely the wrong policies to spur job growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2011
    GLOBAL TRENDS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT 2011 Analysis of Trends and Issues in the Financing of Renewable Energy ROGRAMME P NVIRONMENT E ATIONS N NITED U Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2011 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer United Nations Environment Programme: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Bloomberg New Energy Finance: The information contained in this publication is derived from carefully selected public sources we believe are reasonable, however we cannot be responsible for its accuracy or completeness. Any opinions expressed reflect the current judgement of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Finance LP. The opinions presented are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7
    Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7, 2020 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Embassy of Denmark 1 Introductory Remarks Jessica Rackley, Energy & Environment Program Director, NGA Center for Best Practices Michael Guldbrandtsen, Counselor, Embassy of Denmark Thank You to our Sponsors States with Clean Energy Goals Source: NGA, 2020 Offshore Wind Technical Potential Source: NREL, 2016 Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment for the United States Today’s Virtual Meeting: Zoom Controls The Zoom menu bar appears at the If you don’t see the menu bar, move your bottom of the Zoom window once the meeting begins. mouse slightly and the bar will appear. Chat your questions Introductory Remarks Michael Guldbrandtsen Counselor Embassy of Denmark Welcome Remarks Tim Blute Director NGA Center for Best Practices Introduction to the Day – Offshore Wind Update Thomas Brostrøm CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Summit Thomas Brostrøm, CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Update September 25, 2020 Ranked most sustainable company in the world 2 Significant transformation of Ørsted over the past decade 1 Note 1: Figures taken from Ørsted’s Annual Report 2019. Excluding Radius (power distribution business which was divested during 2019) Note 2: ROCE target for 2019-2025 3 Note 3: International share calculated based on Group EBITDA excl. divestments and miscellaneous un-allocated costs totalling 16 DKKbn The first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – We will become carbon neutral by 2025. – This will make Ørsted the first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – far ahead of science-based decarbonization targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications
    WIND POWER STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS www.RRCcompanies.com experience matters At the heart of a successful project lies a team of experts who can convert their knowledge to project results. Our successful business model starts with listening to our clients’ SOLUTIONS objectives and applying our experience to develop a project approach that optimizes value. We provide solutions our clients can trust, added value through our innovative abilities, and exceptional service. With project YOU CAN experience and a value engineering approach, we provide economical solutions to complex problems. Our engineers, scientists, and surveyors are among the most experienced in their fields. TRUST We believe that experience matters. It’s more than a tag line. It’s how we define ourselves. Integrity Accountability We conduct our business honestly and ethically. We We expect high standards from our services and take responsibility for both our words and actions and our people. We commit to consistently improve the provide solutions our clients can trust. services we provide and we are accountable for the quality of those services. Exceed Client Expectations We exceed our clients’ expectations with our Innovation & Continuous Improvement exceptional service. We strive to be our clients’ first As the industry evolves and advances, we maintain choice for the industries we serve by delivering more an innovative perspective and seek to continuously value than they expected. improve and incorporate the latest industry advancements. We are constantly expanding our expertise. Employee Development We understand that exceeding our clients’ VALUES expectations can only be achieved with great people. We invest in professional development of our team and work hard to retain and recruit top talent.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Begins Here
    For Immediate Release Contacts: October 2, 2012 Ms. J ewelle Yamada Phone: 212-207-0574 E-mail: [email protected] Ms. Vanessa Goldschneider Phone: 212-207-0567 E-mail: [email protected] Sumitomo Invests in Desert Sunlight Solar Farm, The Largest PV Project Approved for Federal Land NEW YORK, NEW YORK, October 2, 2012 --- Sumitomo Corporation of America (SCOA), together with its parent, Sumitomo Corporation (SC) (collectively Sumitomo), have invested in the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm, a 550-megawatt (MW) solar power project under construction in the California desert, east of Palm Springs. This is Sumitomo’s first investment in U.S. solar projects and will expand Sumitomo’s renewable energy portfolio, which already includes over 1,800 MW in projects across the United States. According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Desert Sunlight is the largest solar photovoltaic (PV) facility approved for U.S. public land. It will generate enough energy to power more than 165,000 homes and displace 300,000 metric tons of greenhouse emissions per year – equivalent to taking 60,000 cars off the road. It is located on approximately 4,100 acres, and the facility is estimated to create more than 630 jobs at peak construction. The solar farm – whose other investors include GE Energy Financial Services and NextEra Energy Resources farm – was initially developed by First Solar Inc., the largest U.S. utility-scale solar project developer. First Solar will construct, operate and maintain the project, which uses the company’s advanced thin-film PV technology. Desert Sunlight has secured Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) to supply Southern California Edison with 250 MW, and Pacific Gas & Electric with 300MW of clean energy for the next two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in M Ch Garl
    Renewable Energy in M ch garl Summary A skilled workforce, supportive policies, and significant renewable energy resource development have positioned Michigan to become an important U.S. hub for clean energy production. Michigan's incentives rank among the most effective in the country for attracting clean energy manufacturing and R&D. According to a study released in early 2012 by the Michigan Public Service Commission, the state's renewable portfolio standard has led to more than 100 MW of added renewable capacity, $100 million in investments, and has significantly reduced the cost of new, renewable energy since 2008. nstalledx. Renewable Energy Capacity, 2011 377 MW Ocean 0 MW Soles Photovoltaic 9 MW Biomass Power 476 MW Concentrated Solar Thermal 0 MW Bioethanol 268 mGy Geothermal 0 MW Biodiesel 50 mGy Hydropower 383 MW Totals 1,245 MW; 318 mGy Estimated capacity as of December 31, 2011; see User's Guide for details. Market • Michigan's wind market has grown from 2.6 MW in 2006 to 487 MW in mid-2012. The 213 MW Gratiot County Wind Project became operational in Summer 2012 and generates enough electricity to power more than 50,000 Michigan homes. • Michigan invests in research and development programs that support growing companies and create high-tech jobs. The state of Michigan and Michigan universities are presently establishing and conducting R&D programs with the state's bioenergy, solar, wind, and other companies, often in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy and its National Laboratories. • At least six anaerobic digestion facilities have been set up at dairy and swine farms in the state, with a joint capacity of 3.7 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment
    WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment VaughnVaughn NelsonNelson CRC Press Taylor Si Francis Group BocaBoca RatonRaton LondonLondon NewNewYor Yorkk CRCCRC PressPress isis an an imprintimprint ofof thethe TaylorTaylor && FrancisFrancis Group,Group, anan informa informa businessbusiness © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-7568-7 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the valid- ity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti- lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy- ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]