DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Order on Site Certificate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Order on Site Certificate BEFORE THE ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL OF THE STATE OF OREGON ) In the Matter of the Application for a Site Certificate ) FINAL ORDER for the Shepherds Flat Wind Farm ) ) The Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council July 25, 2008 SHEPHERDS FLAT WIND FARM FINAL ORDER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. THE SITE CERTIFICATE APPLICATION ................................................................................................................. 2 III. GENERAL FINDINGS OF FACT ................................................................................................................... 5 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ......................................................................................................... 5 (a) Project Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 5 (b) The Energy Facility ........................................................................................................................................ 5 (c) Related or Supporting Facilities...................................................................................................................... 7 Power Collection System ........................................................................................................................... 7 Collector Substations and Interconnection ................................................................................................. 7 Meteorological Towers ............................................................................................................................... 8 Field Workshops ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Control System ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Access Roads .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Additional Construction Areas ................................................................................................................... 9 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY .............................................................................................................. 9 3. THE SITE AND SITE BOUNDARY ........................................................................................................................ 10 4. CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES ............................................................................................................................. 10 IV. THE COUNCIL’S SITING STANDARDS: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................... 10 1. GENERAL STANDARD OF REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 11 2. STANDARDS ABOUT THE APPLICANT ................................................................................................................ 11 (a) Organizational Expertise............................................................................................................................... 11 A. Applicant’s Expertise .............................................................................................................................. 12 B. Third-Party Permits ................................................................................................................................. 13 (b) Retirement and Financial Assurance ............................................................................................................ 13 A. Retirement ............................................................................................................................................... 13 B. Estimated Cost of Site Restoration .......................................................................................................... 14 C. Ability of the Applicant to Obtain a Bond or Letter of Credit ................................................................. 16 3. STANDARDS ABOUT THE IMPACTS OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION .......................................................... 17 (a) Land Use ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 A. Gilliam County’s Applicable Substantive Criteria .................................................................................. 20 GCZO Section 4.020(A): EFU Exclusive Farm Use ................................................................................ 20 GCZO Section 4.020(D)(14): Conditional Uses Permitted ...................................................................... 21 GCZO Section 4.020(J): Property Development Standards ..................................................................... 22 GCZO Section 7.010(A)(1): General Approval Criteria and Conditions (1)............................................ 25 GCZO Section 7.010(A)(2): General Approval Criteria and Conditions (2)............................................ 28 GCZO Section 7.020(Q): Conditional Uses in Exclusive Farm Use Zones ............................................. 30 GCZO Section 7.020(T): Wind Power Generation Facility Siting Requirements .................................... 32 B. Morrow County’s Applicable Substantive Criteria ................................................................................. 38 MCZO Section 1.050: Zoning Permit ...................................................................................................... 39 MCZO Section 3.010(D)(16): Conditional Uses Permitted ..................................................................... 41 MCZO Section 3.010(D): Limitations on Conditional Uses .................................................................... 42 MCZO Section 3.010(G): Dimensional Standards ................................................................................... 42 MCZO Section 3.010(I): Transportation Impacts..................................................................................... 43 MCZO Section 6.020: General Criteria .................................................................................................... 44 MCZO Section 6.030: General Conditions .............................................................................................. 47 MCZO Section 6.040: Permit and Improvements Assurance ................................................................... 48 SHEPHERDS FLAT WIND FARM FINAL ORDER - July 25, 2008 - i - MCZO Section 6.050(O): Standards Governing Conditional Uses: Radio, Television Tower, Utility Station or Substation................................................................................................................................. 49 C. Applicable Statewide Planning Goals...................................................................................................... 50 The Principal Use ..................................................................................................................................... 51 The Access Roads .................................................................................................................................... 52 Substations and Interconnection Line ....................................................................................................... 53 D. Goal 3 Exception ..................................................................................................................................... 55 (b) Soil Protection .............................................................................................................................................. 58 A. Impacts During Construction ................................................................................................................... 58 B. Impacts During Operation ....................................................................................................................... 59 C. Control and Impact Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................ 59 (c) Protected Areas ............................................................................................................................................. 60 A. Noise ........................................................................................................................................................ 62 B. Traffic ...................................................................................................................................................... 63 C. Water Use and Wastewater Disposal ....................................................................................................... 63 D. Visual Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... 63 (d) Scenic Resources .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Willow Creek Wind Project June 2008
    United States Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Willow Creek Wind Project June 2008 INTRODUCTION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms for interconnection of up to 72 megawatts (MW) of power to be generated by the proposed Willow Creek Wind Project (Wind Project) into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Willow Creek Energy LLC (WCE) proposes to construct and operate the proposed Wind Project in Gilliam and Morrow counties, Oregon, and has requested interconnection to the FCRTS at a point along BPA’s existing Tower Road-Alkali 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Gilliam County, Oregon. BPA will construct a tap to allow the Wind Project to interconnect to BPA’s transmission line, and will install new equipment at BPA’s existing Boardman Substation in Morrow County, Oregon to accommodate this additional power in the FCRTS. BPA’s decision to offer terms to interconnect the Wind Project is consistent with BPA’s Business Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS) (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995), and the Business Plan Record of Decision (BP ROD, August 15, 1995). This decision thus is tiered to the BP ROD. BACKGROUND BPA is a federal agency that owns and operates the majority of the high-voltage electric transmission system in the Pacific Northwest. This system is known as the FCRTS. BPA has adopted an Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff) for the FCRTS, consistent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) pro forma open access tariff.1 Under BPA’s Tariff, BPA offers transmission interconnection to the FCRTS to all eligible customers on a first-come, first-served basis, with this offer subject to an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Document Daily 01.Pdf
    Not Very Green, Not Many Jobs An Assessment of the Obama Administration’s Green Jobs Agenda Executive Summary President Obama took office amid a weak economy and high unemployment. In spite of profound and urgent economic challenges, he remained committed to advancing an expansive environmental agenda. He promised to address global warming and other environmental concerns in a manner that would also create jobs and strengthen the American economy. Thus began the Administration’s so-called green jobs agenda, modeled after similar efforts underway in several European nations. The President’s green jobs experiment received substantial funding with the February 2009 passage of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Recovery Act or “stimulus”). Evaluating the President’s so-called green jobs effort is not a criticism of clean energy technologies, which play an important role in powering the future, but rather is an indictment of the Obama Administration’s management, execution, and record of its numerous programs that were falsely sold to the American people for their job potential when the jobs were never going to materialize. For 40 consecutive months and counting, the United States has endured a national unemployment rate higher than 8 percent, and speculation about the role of stimulus-funded programs continues unabated. Very few green jobs have been created. The green jobs agenda is an unfolding failure and the environmental merits of green jobs have also been called into question. The key components of the Administration’s green jobs agenda – increased spending, higher energy costs, and more environmental regulation – are precisely the wrong policies to spur job growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2011
    GLOBAL TRENDS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT 2011 Analysis of Trends and Issues in the Financing of Renewable Energy ROGRAMME P NVIRONMENT E ATIONS N NITED U Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2011 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer United Nations Environment Programme: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Bloomberg New Energy Finance: The information contained in this publication is derived from carefully selected public sources we believe are reasonable, however we cannot be responsible for its accuracy or completeness. Any opinions expressed reflect the current judgement of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Finance LP. The opinions presented are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications
    WIND POWER STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS www.RRCcompanies.com experience matters At the heart of a successful project lies a team of experts who can convert their knowledge to project results. Our successful business model starts with listening to our clients’ SOLUTIONS objectives and applying our experience to develop a project approach that optimizes value. We provide solutions our clients can trust, added value through our innovative abilities, and exceptional service. With project YOU CAN experience and a value engineering approach, we provide economical solutions to complex problems. Our engineers, scientists, and surveyors are among the most experienced in their fields. TRUST We believe that experience matters. It’s more than a tag line. It’s how we define ourselves. Integrity Accountability We conduct our business honestly and ethically. We We expect high standards from our services and take responsibility for both our words and actions and our people. We commit to consistently improve the provide solutions our clients can trust. services we provide and we are accountable for the quality of those services. Exceed Client Expectations We exceed our clients’ expectations with our Innovation & Continuous Improvement exceptional service. We strive to be our clients’ first As the industry evolves and advances, we maintain choice for the industries we serve by delivering more an innovative perspective and seek to continuously value than they expected. improve and incorporate the latest industry advancements. We are constantly expanding our expertise. Employee Development We understand that exceeding our clients’ VALUES expectations can only be achieved with great people. We invest in professional development of our team and work hard to retain and recruit top talent.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Begins Here
    For Immediate Release Contacts: October 2, 2012 Ms. J ewelle Yamada Phone: 212-207-0574 E-mail: [email protected] Ms. Vanessa Goldschneider Phone: 212-207-0567 E-mail: [email protected] Sumitomo Invests in Desert Sunlight Solar Farm, The Largest PV Project Approved for Federal Land NEW YORK, NEW YORK, October 2, 2012 --- Sumitomo Corporation of America (SCOA), together with its parent, Sumitomo Corporation (SC) (collectively Sumitomo), have invested in the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm, a 550-megawatt (MW) solar power project under construction in the California desert, east of Palm Springs. This is Sumitomo’s first investment in U.S. solar projects and will expand Sumitomo’s renewable energy portfolio, which already includes over 1,800 MW in projects across the United States. According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Desert Sunlight is the largest solar photovoltaic (PV) facility approved for U.S. public land. It will generate enough energy to power more than 165,000 homes and displace 300,000 metric tons of greenhouse emissions per year – equivalent to taking 60,000 cars off the road. It is located on approximately 4,100 acres, and the facility is estimated to create more than 630 jobs at peak construction. The solar farm – whose other investors include GE Energy Financial Services and NextEra Energy Resources farm – was initially developed by First Solar Inc., the largest U.S. utility-scale solar project developer. First Solar will construct, operate and maintain the project, which uses the company’s advanced thin-film PV technology. Desert Sunlight has secured Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) to supply Southern California Edison with 250 MW, and Pacific Gas & Electric with 300MW of clean energy for the next two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in M Ch Garl
    Renewable Energy in M ch garl Summary A skilled workforce, supportive policies, and significant renewable energy resource development have positioned Michigan to become an important U.S. hub for clean energy production. Michigan's incentives rank among the most effective in the country for attracting clean energy manufacturing and R&D. According to a study released in early 2012 by the Michigan Public Service Commission, the state's renewable portfolio standard has led to more than 100 MW of added renewable capacity, $100 million in investments, and has significantly reduced the cost of new, renewable energy since 2008. nstalledx. Renewable Energy Capacity, 2011 377 MW Ocean 0 MW Soles Photovoltaic 9 MW Biomass Power 476 MW Concentrated Solar Thermal 0 MW Bioethanol 268 mGy Geothermal 0 MW Biodiesel 50 mGy Hydropower 383 MW Totals 1,245 MW; 318 mGy Estimated capacity as of December 31, 2011; see User's Guide for details. Market • Michigan's wind market has grown from 2.6 MW in 2006 to 487 MW in mid-2012. The 213 MW Gratiot County Wind Project became operational in Summer 2012 and generates enough electricity to power more than 50,000 Michigan homes. • Michigan invests in research and development programs that support growing companies and create high-tech jobs. The state of Michigan and Michigan universities are presently establishing and conducting R&D programs with the state's bioenergy, solar, wind, and other companies, often in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy and its National Laboratories. • At least six anaerobic digestion facilities have been set up at dairy and swine farms in the state, with a joint capacity of 3.7 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE/EIS-0183: Record of Decision for The
    United States Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Willow Creek Wind Project June 2008 INTRODUCTION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms for interconnection of up to 72 megawatts (MW) of power to be generated by the proposed Willow Creek Wind Project (Wind Project) into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Willow Creek Energy LLC (WCE) proposes to construct and operate the proposed Wind Project in Gilliam and Morrow counties, Oregon, and has requested interconnection to the FCRTS at a point along BPA’s existing Tower Road-Alkali 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Gilliam County, Oregon. BPA will construct a tap to allow the Wind Project to interconnect to BPA’s transmission line, and will install new equipment at BPA’s existing Boardman Substation in Morrow County, Oregon to accommodate this additional power in the FCRTS. BPA’s decision to offer terms to interconnect the Wind Project is consistent with BPA’s Business Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS) (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995), and the Business Plan Record of Decision (BP ROD, August 15, 1995). This decision thus is tiered to the BP ROD. BACKGROUND BPA is a federal agency that owns and operates the majority of the high-voltage electric transmission system in the Pacific Northwest. This system is known as the FCRTS. BPA has adopted an Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff) for the FCRTS, consistent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) pro forma open access tariff.1 Under BPA’s Tariff, BPA offers transmission interconnection to the FCRTS to all eligible customers on a first-come, first-served basis, with this offer subject to an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGN and ANALYSIS of FOUNDATION for ONSHORE TALL WIND TURBINES Shweta Shrestha Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 12-2015 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FOUNDATION FOR ONSHORE TALL WIND TURBINES Shweta Shrestha Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Shrestha, Shweta, "DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FOUNDATION FOR ONSHORE TALL WIND TURBINES" (2015). All Theses. 2291. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2291 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FOUNDATION FOR ONSHORE TALL WIND TURBINES A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Civil Engineering by Shweta Shrestha December 2015 Accepted by: Dr. Nadarajah Ravichandran, Committee Chair Dr. Ronald D. Andrus Dr. Qiushi Chen ABSTRACT Wind turbines play a vital role in producing sustainable and clean energy to fulfill the growing energy needs. Energy generated from wind turbines being more sustainable and cost effective, many countries have taken a major step to develop wind turbines with large capacity. There has been a significant reduction in the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) since the 1980’s from the development of larger wind farms and from consistent performance improvements of wind turbine components. The power generation capacity of wind turbines has increased significantly over the years with the use of taller towers. When the tower height increases, the loads on the foundation increase and the foundation becomes significantly larger.
    [Show full text]
  • Google, Japanese Invest $500 Million in Wind Farm (Corrected) 18 April 2011
    Google, Japanese invest $500 million in wind farm (corrected) 18 April 2011 expertise, innovation and strong financial profiles to the landmark Shepherds Flat wind farm project," Les Gelber, a partner at Caithness Energy, said in a statement. Google said the electricity produced at Shepherds Flat will be sold to Southern California Edison. The Mountain View, California-based Internet company said the Shepherds Flat investment brings Google's total investment in clean energy to more than $350 million. A wind turbine. Google and the subsidiaries of two Japanese companies are investing $500 million in a Google last month announced it has invested $168 wind farm being built in the northwestern US state of million to help complete the construction of one of Oregon. the world's biggest solar energy power plants in California's Mojave Desert. "We remain on the lookout for more projects that Google and the subsidiaries of two Japanese make business sense and will help all of us take companies are investing $500 million in a wind advantage of clean, renewable energy," Rick farm being built in the northwestern US state of Needham, Google's director of green business Oregon. operations said. Google said in a blog post Monday it was investing (c) 2011 AFP $100 million in the Shepherds Flat Wind Farm, expected to be the largest in the world when it is completed in 2012. Google said the wind farm is intended to produce 845 megawatts of energy, enough to power more than 235,000 homes. Co-investors in the $2 billion project are Sumitomo Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaihdemarkkinoiden Uudet Kasvunlähteet
    Vaihdemarkkinoiden uudet kasvunlähteet Kari Romppanen Pro gradu -tutkielma Liiketoimintalähtöisen osaamisen maisterikoulutus Jyväskylän yliopisto, Fysiikan laitos 1.4.2014 Ohjaajat: Jussi Maunuksela (JYU) Jari Toikkanen (Moventas) Toni Krankkala (Moventas) 1 ESIPUHE Tein muutama vuosi sitten seminaariesitykseksi vaihteiden käyttöä vuorovesivoimaloissa tutkivan seminaarityön. Näin muutaman vuoden jälkeen kyseisiä vuorovesivoimalan vaihteita saattaa tulla nyt Moventaksen tuotantoon lähiaikoina. Tutkielmassa olen pystynyt soveltuvin osin hyödyntämään seminaarityön aikana kertynyttä aineistoa. Seminaarityötä tehdessä ja yliopistolla kurssien muodossa sain myös tietoa muista energiatekniikan aloista ja sovellutuksista. Lueskelin kirjoja, lehtiä ja muita julkaisuja kokoajan, myös muiden alojen mahdollisista vaihteistojen soveltuvuudesta Moventaksen tuotantoon eli taustatietoa aiheeseen oli jo kartoitettu aika paljon ennen työn tekemistä. Kun yliopiston puolesta kursseja oli tarpeeksi tehty ja pro gradu -työn tekeminen alkoi olla ajankohtaista Moventaksella alettiin tehdä uutta strategiaa. Kyselin yhtiön johdolta voisinko tehdä vuorovesivoimala vaihteiden tapaista esitystä ja tutkia mahdollisia, muita aloja mihin vaihteita voitaisiin toimittaa. Ajatukset olivat aikalailla samanlaisia alojen tutkimisen suhteen. Toivon, että työllä olisi merkitystä mahdolliseen Moventaksen tulevaan vaihde tuotantoon ja siitä saataisiin mahdollisesti uusia ideoita tai ajatuksia vaihteistojen tuottamiseen. Erityiskiitokseni annan Toikkasen Jarille, joka toimi valvoja
    [Show full text]
  • THE SLUSH FUND a Felony Organized Crime Using Taxpayer Funds and Stock Market Manipulation for Quid Pro Quo Payola and Money-Laundering
    THE SLUSH FUND A Felony Organized Crime Using Taxpayer Funds And Stock Market Manipulation For Quid Pro Quo Payola And Money-Laundering 1 Draft Revision #4 – Download this document again in 30 days for updates A crime investigation provided to the public and to every federal law enforcement agency Notes: This is a Public Domain report. Protected under Non-Commercial and News Material Fair Use; Freedom-of-The-Press rights; U.S. First Amendment; SLAPP/Anti-SLAPP; UN Rights Protections; GDPR Compliance; Section 203 protections – U.S.; ACLU litigation warning; ICIJ investigations and related protections. Authored via Wikipedia and WikiLawPedia process via internet users. References and validation links are contained within the body of the document. We lost tens of millions of dollars because the White House, the Department of Energy and their tech financiers defrauded us and then put a hit-job on us for reporting this crime. State and Federal officials are still covering this up and refusing to allow our case into a jury trial. Congressional, private and federal investigators hunted every single one of the crooks and attackers down for us and we are shaming every single one of them FOREVER! 2 Table of Contents THE SLUSH FUND..................................................................................................................................1 Overview:...................................................................................................................................................5 The Whorehouse Lender............................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Etapy Rozwoju Energetyki Wiatrowej W Województwie Kujawsko-Pomorskim
    Moduł E1 Etapy rozwoju energetyki wiatrowej w województwie kujawsko-pomorskim Koordynator modułu - dr Dariusz Brykała Autorzy: Prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Podgórski Mgr Łukasz Sarnowski 1 5.1.1. Etapy rozwoju energetyki wiatrowej na świecie i w Europie Początki wykorzystania przez człowieka energii wiatru są trudne do jednoznacznego określe- nia. Egipcjanie już 2000 lat przed naszą erą wykorzystywali energię wiatru do napędu swoich łodzi. Z Kodeksu Hammurabiego (ok. 1750 r. p.n.e.) wynika, że energia wiatru była wykorzystywana również w Persji. W Indiach w IV w. p.n.e. powstał pierwszy opis zastosowania wiatraka do pompowania wody, a już w II wieku p.n.e w Chinach stosowano wiatraki w kształcie kołowrotów do nawadniania pól uprawnych. Na początku naszej ery wiatraki pojawiły się w krajach basenu Morza Śródziemnego. Rok 644 n.e. uznany został za datę pierwszej udokumentowanej wzmianki o wiatrakach. Pierwsze wiatraki europejskie pojawiły się w Anglii w IX wieku, we Francji w XI wieku, a od wieku XIII upowszechniły się w Europie Zachodniej. Najstarszy obraz wiatraka w Europie znajduje się na inicjale pierwszej strony rękopisu angielskiego z 1270 r. Pierwotnie wiatrak był drewnianą "bud- ką", którą obracano wokół centralnie usytuowanego słupa, tak aby ustawić skrzydła na wiatr. Rewo- lucji w konstrukcji wiatraków dokonali Holendrzy, którzy wprowadzili konstrukcje czteroskrzydłowe. Miało to miejsce w 1390 r. Rozwój wiatraków typu „holendrów” przypadł w Europie na XVII wiek. W roku 1745 angielski konstruktor Edmund Lee wprowadził w budowie wiatraka pomocnicze koło kie- rujące automatycznie wiatrak w stronę wiatru. Największy rozkwit wiatraków miał miejsce w poło- wie XIX wieku. W Europie pracowało wówczas około 200 tysięcy tego typu obiektów (Lerch, 2010).
    [Show full text]