Cocamidopropyl Betaine — Which Received the Designation of Allergen of the Year in 2004 from the American Contact Dermatitis Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cocamidopropyl Betaine — Which Received the Designation of Allergen of the Year in 2004 from the American Contact Dermatitis Society ALLERGENFocus Sharon E. Jacob, M.D. Sadegh Amini, M.D. in approximately 25.5% of patients with allergic contact dermatitis.1 This being said, many relevant allergens are not detected with this screening tool alone and, for this reason we decided to expand this column this month to cover one of the notorious allergens — cocamidopropyl betaine — which received the designation of Allergen of the Year in 2004 from the American Contact Dermatitis Society. THE CONTACT DERMATITIDES Allergic contact dermatitis is an important disease with high impact both in terms of patient morbidity and eco- nomics.The contact dermatitides include irritant contact dermatitis, contact urticaria and allergic contact dermatitis. Irritant contact dermatitis, the most common form, accounts for approxi- mately 80% of environmental-occupa- tional based dermatoses. Contact urticaria (wheal and flare reaction) represents an IgE and mast cell- mediated immediate-type hypersensitiv- ity reaction that can lead to anaphylaxis, the foremost example of this being latex Focus on the Non-T.R.U.E. Test Allergen — hypersensitivity.While this is beyond the scope of this section, we acknowledge this form of hypersensitivity due to the severity of the potential reactions and Cocamidopropyl Betaine direct the reader to key sources.2,3 Allergic contact dermatitis affects more than 70 million Americans each BY SHARON E. JACOB, M.D., AND SADEGH AMINI, M.D. year and has a high impact both in terms of patient morbidity and economics. The primary focus of this section is to ince January of 2005, this column has highlighted a different thin-layer highlight the educational component of rapid-use epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) test allergen each month and intended this important inflammatory disorder. S to answer some of the most frequent questions relating to their origin and most common uses. Each column has also highlighted appropriate products CASE ILLUSTRATION that affected patients should avoid, along with tips to avoid cross-reactions A man presented to the University of and exposures. Miami Contact Dermatitis Clinic with This month, we break from the tradition of this column to discuss a non- an unresolving generalized dermatitis T.R.U.E. test allergen. Although the T.R.U.E. test screens for 46 distinct allergens with itching despite avoiding the and the Balsam of Peru mixture and it is a valuable first-line screening tool to formaldehyde allergen that had been assess for allergic contact dermatitis, it is thought to adequately identify an allergen previously identified by T.R.U.E testing. 12 AUGUST 2006 SKIN & AGING THE HISTORY OF SOAP MAKING THE BIRTH OF PROCTER & GAMBLE According to archaeological excava- While candle maker William Procter tions in Babylon, the oldest inscriptions and soap maker James Gamble formed on the soap making process were found an alliance in 1837, it was the American on clay containers dated at 2800 B.C.4,5 Civil War Army supply contracts The early Egyptians were also well attained by Procter & Gamble (P&G) versed in regular bathing practices. From that catapulted this company to the per- 1500 B.C.,The Ebers Papyrus describes sonal hygiene industry forefront. the combination of animal and plant fats Furthermore, soldiers returning home with alkaline salts to obtain a soap with P&G products introduced the substance for use in the treatment of company to domestic America and diseases and bathing.4,5 made P&G a household name.5,7 It is believed that when animals were In 1879, James Norris Gamble, son of sacrificed and cremated at Mount Sapo the co-founder and a trained chemist, near ancient Rome, melted animal fat developed an inexpensive white soap, (tallow) mixed with wood ashes and clay which was equal in quality to the soil was washed down by the rain into imported castiles. the Tevere River. Roman women Procter & Gamble continued to grow promoted effective washing with this in response to the growing popularity mixture.4-6 By 312 B.C., the Terme Di for perfumed beauty soaps. In 1933 Caracalla aqueduct-based Roman bath- “Ma Perkins”, a radio series program house was built. sponsored by P&G’s Oxydol soap pow- The popularization of soap through- der, aired nationally.The popularity led out the Roman Empire led to the foun- THE EARLY EGYPTIANS P&G brands to sponsor numerous new dation of soap factories, remnants of WERE ALSO WELL VERSED radio series, and hence “soap operas” which can be seen in the ruins of the were born. city of Pompeii, destroyed in 79 A.D. IN REGULAR BATHING Notably,the first major league baseball game aired on television accompanied PRACTICES. FROM 1500 B.C., BATHING BECOMES UNPOPULAR by the first Ivory Soap television com- With the fall of the Roman Empire in THE EBERS PAPYRUS mercial. 476 A.D. came a marked decrease in Procter & Gamble’s invention of bathing and clothes washing — usher- DESCRIBES THE Dreft, the first synthetic detergent for ing in the “darkness” of the Middle COMBINATION OF household use, laid the groundwork for Ages. The populous superstitiously a revolution in cleaning technology and feared that it was the water that contam- ANIMAL AND PLANT FATS the introduction of new product lines inated the inner body with illnesses WITH ALKALINE SALTS TO such as Tide “the washing miracle”, Prell through dilation of the skin’s pores.5 (1946), and Crest — the first fluoride In the 7th century, however, the Arab OBTAIN A SOAP cavity fighting toothpaste soap (1955). trade routes renewed the demand for When P&G celebrated its 150th soaps.And by the 10th century, the soap- SUBSTANCE FOR USE IN anniversary in 1987, the company manufacturing industry boomed once THE TREATMENT OF ranked as the second-oldest company again in southern Europe (Italy, Spain among the 50 largest corporations. 4,5 and France) where raw materials such as DISEASES AND BATHING. Recently, the company introduced olive oil were readily available. Pantene Pro-V, the fastest growing Almost every European city was a detergent shampoo in the world with major producer of soap, with the excep- sales exceeding $30 billion.8 tion of England, which began mass manufacturing soap in the 12th century. rather than combat injuries, were DRAMATIC CHANGE IN SOAP MAKING Of economic interest, governments saved when British nurse Florence Sales alone speak to the competitive enjoyed the heavy luxury tax added to Nightingale realized that hygienic demand for synthetic detergents, but soap for more than nine centuries, until reforms in field hospitals dramatically their creation was a circuitous road.The the levy was lifted in the 19th century. decreased the death rate. soap manufacturing process dramatically When the American Civil War broke changed in 1916 with the advent of the FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE RECOGNIZES out in 1861, this knowledge was put first synthetic detergent developed by THE POWER OF HYGIENE into practice, exposing thousands of the Germans in the First World War to During the Crimean War (1854- Americans to the use of soap and the compensate for the shortage of available 1857), British soldiers, dying of diseases concept of regular bathing. fats. And again, synthetics production AUGUST 2006 SKIN & AGING 13 boomed with the WWII interruption of Of the 50 principal allergens found References: fat and oil supplies and the military positive in patch tests performed by the 1. Saripalli YV,Achen F,Belsito DV. The detec- demand for all-purpose “built” deter- North American Contact Dermatitis tion of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. gents, containing a dirt removing surface Group from 1995 to 2001, CAPB was J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 July;49(1):65-9. active agent (surfactant) and a catalyst the twenty-ninth most common.1 2. Cohen DE, Kaufmann JM. Hypersensitivity (builder) in combination. By 2003, the worldwide consumption reactions to products and devices in plastic sur- One of the major advantages these of surfactant detergents and soaps was gery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2003;11(2): synthetic surfactants had over soap was more than 27 million metric tons, with 253-65. that they performed much better in cold surfactants accounting for two-thirds 3.Valks R, Conde-Salazar L, Cuevas M.Allergic and hard water (high-metal composi- (18 million tons) of the gross product.5 contact urticaria from natural rubber latex in tion: Ca, Mg, Fe or Mn).Another was the In the face of this multi-billion dollar healthcare and non-healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(4):222-4. milder nature of the amphoteric (zwitte- industry, CAPB became the 2004 rionic) betaines. The original betaine Allergen of the Year. 4. Soaps and detergents history.The Soap and Detergent Association.Accessible on the Internet products were introduced to the market at: http://www.cleaning101.com/cleaning/ in 1947 by the Goldschmidt Chemical TESTING FOR CAPB SENSITIVITY history/. Corporation, a leader in textile industry Although patch testing for CAPB 5. History of Washing. Science in the box. detergents. allergy cannot be accomplished with the Accessible on the Internet at: www.scienceinthe- current T.R.U.E. test, it can be box.com. P&G. Copyright 2000, 2001. FIRST BETAINE-BASED HYGIENE PRODUCT performed comprehensively. 6. Routh HB., Bhowmik KR., Parish LC., The betaine technology was intro- Evaluation should include concomi- Witkowski JA. Soaps: From the Phoenicians to duced into the field of personal care and tant testing with manufacturing inter- the 20th Century — A Historical Review. hygiene products when Johnson & mediaries, amidoamine and dimethyl- Clin Dermatol. 1996 Jan-Feb;14(1):3-6. Johnson developed the first cocamido- aminopropylamine because these impu- 7. Kostka KL, McKay DD. Chemists clean Up: propyl betaine (CAPB) detergent-based rities are thought to be responsible for a A history and exploration of the craft of Soap making.
Recommended publications
  • Safety Assessment of Alkyl Betaines As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Alkyl Betaines as Used in Cosmetics Status: Draft Tentative Report for Panel Review Release Date: November 15, 2013 Panel Meeting Date: December 9-10, 2013 The 2013 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chairman, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D. James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is Lillian J. Gill, DPA. This safety assessment was prepared by Christina L. Burnett, Scientific Analyst/Writer, and Bart Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist CIR. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1101 17th Street, NW, Suite 412 Washington, DC 20036-4702 ph 202.331.0651 fax 202.331.0088 [email protected] Distributed for Comment Only -- Do Not Cite or Quote Commitment & Credibility since 1976 Memorandum To: CIR Expert Panel Members and Liaisons From: Christina L. Burnett Scientific Writer/Analyst Date: November 15, 2013 Subject: Draft Tentative Report on Alkyl Betaines At the September 2013 CIR Expert Panel Meeting, the Panel issued an insufficient data announcement on the safety assessment of alkyl betaine ingredients. The data needs included: (1) method of manufacturing; and (2) impurities. Since the announcement, we have received method of manufacturing and impurities data from a supplier of coco- betaine. This data along with basic composition data on a betaine analog from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) database and basic method of manufacturing data on food-grade betaine have been incorporated in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine
    COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE Your patch test result indicates that you have a contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine. This contact allergy may cause your skin to react when it is exposed to this substance although it may take several days for the symptoms to appear. Typical symptoms include redness, swelling, itching and fluid-filled blisters. Where is cocamidopropyl betaine found? Cocamidopropyl betaine is used in personal care products like shampoos, hand soaps, and toothpastes, and in cosmetics as an emulsifying agent and thickener. It is also used in conditioners to reduce static cling. How can you avoid contact with cocamidopropyl betaine? Avoid products that list any of the following names in the ingredients: • 1-Propanaminium, N-(carboxymethyl)- N,N-dimethyl-3-((1-oxococonut)amino)-, hydroxide, inner salt • N-(2-Aminoethyl)-N-(2-(2- carboxyethoxy)ethyl) beta-alanine, norcoco acyl derivs., disodium salts • N-(Carboxymethyl)-N,N-dimethyl-3-((1- oxococonut)amino)-1-propanam- inium • Cocamidopropyl betaine • Cocamidopropyl dimethyl glycine • CAS RN: 61789-40-0 What are some products that may contain cocamidopropyl betaine? Anti-fungal: Shampoo/Conditioner: • Mycocide NS • Alberto VO5 Extra Body Shampoo • Alberto VO5 Herbal Escapes Moisturizing Shampoo Cosmetics: • Alberto VO5 Moisture Milks Nourishing Shampoo • Gillette Multi-Glide Shave Gel B,CPB • Alberto VO5 Normal Shampoo Hair Coloring Kits: • Aveeno Baby Wash & Shampoo • Clairol Natural Instincts Haircolor, Level 2, Hazelnut-20 • Charles Worthington Big Hair Full Volume Shampoo •
    [Show full text]
  • (Dimethylamino)Propylamine
    3-Dimethylaminopropylamine 109-55-7 OVERVIEW This material was prepared for the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for consideration by the Chemical Selection Working Group (CSWG) by Technical Resources International, Inc. under Contract no. N02-07007. 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA) came to the attention of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Division of Cancer Biology as the result of a review of chemical industry information suggesting an increased production or use of this chemical. DMAPA appears to have a significant and increasing demand for its use in personal care products. This chemical also has applications in the leather processing, paper, and rubber industries and is an intermediate in the production of fabric softeners, polymers, agrochemicals, flocculating agents, liquid soaps, and dye intermediates. There is a lack of information on the chronic toxicity of DMAPA and other chemicals structurally related to DMAPA. In a SIDS screen, DMAPA produced deaths in high dose animals exposed for 28 days, but this chemical lacked reproductive or developmental effects and produced a negative mutagenicity profile. Workers occupationally exposed to DMAPA at concentrations of 0.55-1.38 mg/m3 experienced impaired respiration that may not have been completely reversible even when concentrations of DMAPA were reduced. Given the lack of chronic toxicity data for DMAPA, its high production volume, and its widespread use, additional toxicity testing appears warranted. NOMINATION OF 3-DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE TO THE NTP Based on a review of available
    [Show full text]
  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB)
    Final Report to DWI September 2020 Personal Care Products and Domestic Cleaning Products – Toxicological Assessment of Prioritised List of Chemicals (Ref: DWI 70/2/331) FINAL REPORT Report to Defra/DWI IEH Consulting Ltd.|September 2020 Final Report to DWI September 2020 PCPs and DCPs – toxicological assessment of prioritised list of chemicals A Report to DWI by IEH Consulting Ltd. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the authors alone, representing their expert opinion based on the review of the available information and their understanding drawn from publications identified from targeted literature searches. Prepared by: Ruth Bevan, Sarah Bull Reviewed by: Camilla Alexander-White, Paul Rumsby Edited by: Paul Harrison September 2020 Final Report to DWI September 2020 Contents Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 9 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................ 11 1.2 Personal Care Products ...................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Domestic Cleaning Products .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of SLES in Personal Care Products by Colloid Titration with Light Reflection Measurements
    molecules Article Determination of SLES in Personal Care Products by Colloid Titration with Light Reflection Measurements Dorota Ziółkowska 1,* , Iryna Syrotynska 2 , Alexander Shyichuk 1 and Jan Lamkiewicz 1 1 Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, UTP University of Science and Technology, Seminaryjna 3, 85-326 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Biochemistry Department, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Halyts’ka 2, 76000 Ivano-Frankivs’k, Ukraine; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The method of colloid titration with poly(diallyldimethylammonium) chloride has been improved to detect the endpoint with an off-vessel light reflectance sensor. The digital color sensor used measures light reflectance by means of light guides, with no immersion into the reaction solution. In such a method, the optical signal is free of disturbances caused by sticky flocs in the solution. The improved automatic titration set was applied for the determination of sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) in industrial batches and commercial personal care products. The sample color and opacity do not disturb the SLES quantification. When the SLES content lies in the range from 5% to 9%, the optimal sample weight is from 6 g to 3 g. Keywords: quantitation of surfactants; turbidity; polyDADMAC; PDADMAC; PDDA; cationic polymer Citation: Ziółkowska, D.; Syrotynska, I.; Shyichuk, A.; Lamkiewicz, J. Determination of SLES in Personal Care Products by Colloid 1. Introduction Titration with Light Reflection Sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) is a common primary surfactant in skin and hair Measurements. Molecules 2021, 26, care products [1–3]. Therefore, the determination of SLES concentration in personal care 2716.
    [Show full text]
  • Cocamide DEA Replacement
    1-800-70PILOT www.pilotchemical.com Cocamide DEA Replacement Pilot Chemical's DEA-Free viscosity building thickeners offer naturally derived foam boosting characteritics built to enhance your Personal Care product line. Available in a variety of active levels and compatible with a wide range of primary surfactants, Pilot's line of DEA-Free thickeners are readily formulated to take your product development further. Product Chemical Name Description Applications Caltaine C-35 Cocamidopropyl Betaine Mild viscosity building and foam boosting agent that is fully compatible Body Wash, Shampoo, Facial Physical Form/Activity with anionic, nonionic, and amphoteric surfactants. Cleansers, Bubble Bath, Hand Soap, Baby Wash Liquid/30% Product Chemical Name Description Applications Caloxamine LO Lauramine Oxide Offers great cleansing, emulsification, and viscosity building characteristics. Body Wash, Shampoo, Fully compatible with anionic, nonionic, and amphoteric surfactants. Provides Hand Soap Physical Form/Activity outstanding foam volume, foam stabiliaztion, and foam boosting properties. Liquid/30% Stable in low and high pH formulations. Product Chemical Name Description Applications Masamide REP Surfactant Blend High foaming thickener with excellent wetting, detergency, and foaming Body Wash, Shampoo, characteristics. Displays great solubility and stability in alkaline and high electrolyte Facial Cleansers, Hand Soap Physical Form/Activity systems and is 1,4-Dioxane Free. This multifunctional blend can be used as a stand Liquid/36% alone surfactant or with amphoteric, nonionic, cationic, and anionic surfactants. Product Chemical Name Description Applications Masamide R-4 PEG-4 Rapeseedamide Unique thickening, foam boosting, foam stabilizing, and solubilizing Body Wash, Shampoo, properties. Naturally derived from the renewable vegetable lipid found in Facial Cleansers, Hand Soap Physical Form/Activity rapeseed oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to Cocamide DEA California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Has Listed Cocamide DEA (CAS No
    Alternatives to Cocamide DEA California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has listed Cocamide DEA (CAS No. 68603-42-9) on Proposition 65. For those looking to reformulate, Stepan is providing the following performance comparison and alternative surfactant recommendations to NINOL® 40-CO (1:1 Cocamide DEA) and NINOL® 11-CM (2:1 Cocamide DEA) for use in liquid dish detergents, all-purpose cleaners, degreasers, and vehicle care detergents. Stepan has a broad amphoteric product line and the technical expertise in hard surface care to assist our customers with product recommendation and reformulation. The recommended surfactants noted below take into consideration performance, handling, typical lead time, and estimated market price. If you require further assistance, please contact your local Stepan sales representative or Stepan U.S. Technical Service at [email protected] or (800) 745-7837. LIQUID DISH DETERGENTS (LDL) For an LDL economy formulation containing Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonate (LAS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), the following surfactants showed equivalent or improved foam mileage and equivalent foam volume compared to NINOL® 40-CO on an equal actives basis. Recommendations Mixer Foam: LAS/SLES Economy AMMONYX® LMDO (Lauramidopropylamine Oxide) 160 AMPHOSOL® CG-50 (Cocamidopropyl Betaine) 150 AMMONYX® CDO SPECIAL (Cocamidopropylamine Oxide) 140 Shake Foam: LAS/SLES Economy 130 Soil D 500 120 Shell 400 110 Soil 300 100 90 200 Normalized Normalized Foam Mileage 80 100 Foam Volume (mL) 0 40-CO LMDO CG-50 CDO SPECIAL For an LDL premium formulation containing Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), the following surfactants showed equivalent or improved foam mileage and equivalent foam volume compared to NINOL® 40-CO on an equal actives basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Shampoos for Special Considerations
    750 West Broadway Suite 905 - Vancouver BC V5Z 1H8 Phone: 604.283.9299 Fax: 604.648.9003 Email: [email protected] Web: www.donovanmedical.com SHAMPOOS FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Many common shampoo products can cause irritation of the scalp. This frequently manifests are redness and itchiness when the products are applied. However, not all products actually cause scalp problems at first – and some start out with irritation of the FEEN- face, eyelids, ears and neck FRAGRANCE- FREE SHAMPOOS Scalp sensitivities can rarely be from fragrance sensitivities. These can also cause reactions on the face and neck. A great majority of shampoos contain fragrance. The following are fragrance Free Shampoos: FREE AND CLEAR SHAMPOO • No fragrance • No Parabens • No SLS (sulphate) • no CAPB purified water, lauryl glucoside, coco-glucoside, acrylates copolymer, disodium cocoyl glutamate, sodium cocoyl glycinate, glycerin, sucrose cocoate, panthenol, pentylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, sodium cocoyl glutamate, disodium EDTA, caprylyl glycol, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride FRAGRANCE- FREE SHAMPOOS (CONTINUED) DUCRAY PHYSIOPROTECTIVE SENSINOL SHAMPOO • No fragrance • No Parabens • No alcohol • no CAPB • Ingredients o WATER (AQUA), SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE, ZINC COCETH SULFATE, CETEARETH-60 MYRISTYL GLYCOL, LAURETH-9, COCO- GLUCOSIDE, 1,2-HEXANEDIOL, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, CITRIC ACID, DISODIUM EDTA, HYDROXYPROPYL GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE, SODIUM CHLORIDE, SODIUM HYDROXIDE AFM SAFE CHOICE HEAD AND BODY SHAMPOO • No fragrance • No Parabens
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Tier 2 Assessment
    Consider It Done www.ehs-support.com.au Qualitative Tier 2 Assessment Cocamidopropyl Betaine In accordance with the Chemical Risk Assessment Framework (CRAF), chemicals assigned a Tier 2 designation require a hazard assessment and qualitative assessment of risk. Consistent with National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS), the human health hazards for each chemical are characterised by analysing the toxicokinetics (the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the chemical in humans or laboratory animals), acute toxicity, irritation and corrosivity, repeat dose toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, and other health effects. The environmental hazards for each chemical are characterized by analysing the environmental fate properties (such as mobility, persistence, bioavailability and bioaccumulation), acute toxicity and chronic toxicity. In support of the hazard assessment, a risk assessment dossier is prepared for each of the chemicals included in the assessment. The qualitative assessment of risk evaluates exposure to the vendor chemical that may occur during activities that do not intentionally result in a release to the environment, but where a potential release may occur. For this evaluation, these potential releases primarily are focused on the vendor chemical transported to the well pad site or water management facility (WMF), chemicals utilised in drilling fluid systems that may impact groundwater, residual chemicals that may be present in hydraulic flowback and workover fluids and chemicals and chemicals and residues of chemicals that may be present in water undergoing treatment or beneficially re-used. Potentially complete exposure pathways (in that a source, a migration pathway, a mechanism for exposure, and a potential receptor are present) are assessed herein to determine the potential for risk (an incomplete pathway precludes an exposure occurring and an associated potential risk).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Names (B) Lauramidopropyl Cocamidopropyl Cocamidopropyl Betaine Betaine Sodium Salts Betaine Inner Salts
    SIAM 23, 17-20 October 2006 DE/ICCA SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE Chemical Category Name Alkylamidopropyl betaines 1-Propanaminium, N- 1-Propanaminium, 3- Amides, coco, > (carboxy-methyl)-N,N- amino- N- 3-(dimethyl- @ dimethyl- N-(carboxymethyl)- amino)propyl , N,N-dimethyl-, CATEGORY MEMBERS: 3->(1-oxododecyl) alkylation products @ N-coco acyl with chloroacetic acid, amino -, inner salts (A) derivatives, inner salts sodium salt (C) Chemical Names (B) Lauramidopropyl Cocamidopropyl Cocamidopropyl betaine betaine sodium salts betaine inner salts CAS Registry Numbers 4292-10-8 61789-40-0 70851-07-9 O + O N N A O STRUCTURAL FORMULAS Cl O O - + O + O R N N R N N Na+ O O C B SUMMARY CONCLUSION OF THE SIAR Category Justification The members of the alkylamidopropyl betaines category are amphoteric surfactants containing a quarternary ammonium ion, a carboxylic structure, and an amide bond. The alkylamidopropyl betaines are referred to as inner salts due to their zwitterionic character. They are all manufactured from oils, usually coconut oil, containing mixtures of C8 to C18 fatty acids and marketed as aqueous solutions (20 - 40 %). Because of the structural and functional similarities and comparable physico-chemical properties of cocamidopropyl betaine inner salts and sodium salts, a similar ecotoxicological and toxicological profile can be expected. Values for physico-chemical endpoints for lauramidopropyl betaine are similar or within the range of values for cocamidopropyl betaines, supported by accepted (Q)SARs even though there may be limitations for surface active substances. Therefore similar ecotoxicological properties were assumed. All available physico- chemical and environmental fate data are similar for lauramidopropyl betaine and cocamidopropyl betaine and hence support this category approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Literature Review Fatty Acid Amidopropyl Dimethylamines As
    Scientific Literature Review Fatty Acid Amidopropyl Dimethylamines as Used in Cosmetics February 13, 2012 All interested persons are provided 60 days from the above date to comment on this Scientific Literature Review and to identify additional published data that should be included or provide unpublished data which can be made public and included. Information may be submitted without identifying the source or the trade name of the cosmetic product containing the ingredient. All unpublished data submitted to CIR will be discussed in open meetings, will be available at the CIR office for review by any interested party and may be cited in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Please submit data, comments, or requests to the CIR Director, Dr. F. Alan Andersen. The 2012 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is F. Alan Andersen, Ph.D. This report was prepared by Christina Burnett, Scientific Analyst/Writer, and Bart Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist CIR. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1101 17th Street, NW, Suite 412 Washington, DC 20036-4702 ph 202.331.0651 fax 202.331.0088 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 CHEMISTRY
    [Show full text]
  • Thickening of Foaming Cosmetic Formulations
    THICKENING OF FOAMING COSMETIC FORMULATIONS Geert De Lathauwer, Daisy De Rycke, Annelies Duynslager, Stijn Tanghe, Caroline Oudt EOC Surfactants nv, Belgium Abstract Enhancing the viscosity of a foaming cosmetic formulation has both marketing and technical reasons. A rich appearance will be correlated by end users with high concentration and value for money. Thickening also has an advantage in applying the product: a thin shampoo would run off the hands easily. In formulation development and optimization, a thickened formulation can also allow keeping heterogeneous solutions in a stable equilibrium. This paper gives an overview of the different ways of incorporating viscosity in a surfactant formulation including an explanation of the mechanisms involved. It summarizes the different types of raw materials available to formulators illustrating their advantages and drawbacks. The second part gives an overview of typical frame formulations of commercially available shampoos and shower gels. Finally, this paper presents an up-to-date list of most widely used alternatives to diethanolamine based surfactants whilst showing their performance. The comparative study illustrates the superiority of one of the selected alternatives from point of view of workability and similar viscosity build-up performance in a formulation as Cocamide DEA. Introduction Enhancing the viscosity of a foaming cosmetic formulation has both marketing and technical reasons. A rich appearance will be correlated by end users with high concentration and so gives them the impression that they get value for money. Thickening also has an advantage in applying the product: low viscous liquids are difficult to apply to hair and skin; more viscous products will not run off the hands too easily.
    [Show full text]