Chullin 19 R’ Mordechai Torczyner – [email protected] 19a Gemara: Continuing the discussion of defining hagramah :מקום שחיטה  This is the hierarchy of views on the o Rabbanan – All below cricoid cartilage o R' Yosi b'R' Yehudah – Majority below cricoid cartilage o R' Chanina ben Antignos – Below thyroid cartilage. Nachman agrees; this is law.1 ?מקום שחיטה  Within R'Yosi b'R' Yehudah's view, what if he cut from the outside into the o Version I . /Rav Asi2 - It must first die via shechitah . Rav Chisda objects: But we accept where the trachea was already flawed! Maybe:  R' Yosi b"R' Yehudah accepts even where hagramah was first, and  Chachamim at least accept where shechitah was first? . Might Rav Chisda support his position from 27a that majority is like the whole? o Version II . Rav Huna/Rav Asi  R' Yosi b"R' Yehudah accepts a pre-flawed trachea  Chachamim at least accept where shechitah was first . Suppport from 27a that majority is like the whole . Rav Chisda – But maybe 27a was only R' Yosi b'R' Yehudah?  Outside, inside, then outside שחיטה o Rav Huna/Rav – Kosher; neshamah leaves with o Rav Yehudah/Rav – Not kosher; when neshamah leaves, majority wasn't shechitah  Inside, outside, then inside o Rav Yehudah/Rav – Kosher o Rav Huna – Non-kosher o (19b) Rav Chisda justifies Rav Huna – The neshamah leaves with hagramah was the kosher "comb" case שחט-הגרים-שחט o In , said ?מקום שחיטה But perhaps the "comb" is kosher only within .  Rav Kahana asked Rav Yehudah a series of questions, and received answers3 Kosher שחט-הגרים-שחט o Not kosher הגרים-שחט-הגרים o the first half is pre-severed) Kosher) שחט במקום נקב o the second half was pre-severed) Not kosher) שחט ופגע בו נקב o . R' Yochanan objected to this ruling . explains the objection: In the latter case he cut all that kept the animal alive

Mishnah: Parts of the neck – Throat and Side4 are for shechitah, Back is for melikah

?is kosher for melikah עורף Gemara: What regarding melikah מול עורף  We must be talking about is back of face עורף is nearby, and מול ?refers to this site ממול ערפו  How do we know that to the back of the neck, so they are still cut first סימנים we move the מליקה  Sons of R' Chiyya said that for

(Maharsha, Rashash) ?"העיד" Don't we know this is the law because R' Chanina ben Antignos was introduced with 1 2 Not "Rabbi Asi" (Tosafot) .שחיטה where it's a bad ,דרסה at all. As opposed to שחיטה means it's not an act of מקום שחיטה Rosh 1:24 explains: Veering out of the 3 4 Is this lechatchilah or bedieved? (Rashi, Tosafot)